Skip to main content
×
×
Home
The Politics of Parliamentary Debate
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 24
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Wendler, Frank 2019. Grand Coalition Policy Meets the EU’s Multiple Crises: Stability Discourse versus Party Politics. German Politics, p. 1.

    Merkley, Eric 2019. Learning from Divided Parties? Legislator Dissent as a Cue for Opinion Formation. Parliamentary Affairs,

    Geese, Lucas 2019. Immigration-related Speechmaking in a Party-constrained Parliament: Evidence from the ‘Refugee Crisis’ of the 18th German Bundestag (2013–2017). German Politics, p. 1.

    Lehrer, Roni and Lin, Nick 2018. Everything to everyone? Not when you are internally divided. Party Politics, p. 135406881881222.

    Sieberer, Ulrich Saalfeld, Thomas Ohmura, Tamaki Bergmann, Henning and Bailer, Stefanie 2018. Roll-Call Votes in the German Bundestag: A New Dataset, 1949–2013. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.

    FLEMING, THOMAS G. 2018. Partisan dealignment and committee power in five Westminster parliaments. European Journal of Political Research,

    Senninger, Roman and Bischof, Daniel 2018. Working in unison: Political parties and policy issue transfer in the multilevel space. European Union Politics, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 140.

    Lapponi, Emanuele Søyland, Martin G. Velldal, Erik and Oepen, Stephan 2018. The Talk of Norway: a richly annotated corpus of the Norwegian parliament, 1998–2016. Language Resources and Evaluation, Vol. 52, Issue. 3, p. 873.

    Vis, Barbara 2018. Heuristics and Political Elites’ Judgment and Decision-Making. Political Studies Review, p. 147892991775031.

    Kirkland, Justin H. and Slapin, Jonathan B. 2018. Roll Call Rebels.

    Proksch, Sven-Oliver 2018. Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft. p. 1.

    Heuwieser, Raphael J. 2018. Submissive Lobby Fodder or Assertive Political Actors? Party Loyalty of Career Politicians in the UK House of Commons, 2005-15. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 305.

    Van Der Velden, Mariken Schumacher, Gijs and Vis, Barbara 2018. Living in the Past or Living in the Future? Analyzing Parties’ Platform Change In Between Elections,The Netherlands 1997–2014. Political Communication, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 393.

    Raunio, Tapio 2018. Parliament as an arena for politicisation: The Finnish Eduskunta and crisis management operations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 158.

    Proksch, Sven-Oliver Lowe, Will Wäckerle, Jens and Soroka, Stuart 2018. Multilingual Sentiment Analysis: A New Approach to Measuring Conflict in Legislative Speeches. Legislative Studies Quarterly,

    Auel, Katrin and Umit, Resul 2018. Explaining MPs’ communication to their constituents: Evidence from the UK House of Commons. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 731.

    Schuler, Paul 2018. Position Taking or Position Ducking? A Theory of Public Debate in Single-Party Legislatures. Comparative Political Studies, p. 001041401875876.

    Ceron, Andrea 2017. Intra-party politics in 140 characters. Party Politics, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 7.

    Alemán, Eduardo Ramírez, Margarita M. and Slapin, Jonathan B. 2017. Party Strategies, Constituency Links, and Legislative Speech. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 637.

    Ceron, Andrea 2017. Social Media and Political Accountability. p. 197.

    ×

Book description

Parliamentary debate is a fundamental aspect of democratic law-making. While law makers everywhere seek to express their views in parliament, there are large discrepancies in who has access to the floor across political systems. This book explains how parties and their members of parliament (MPs) structure parliamentary debate. Parties may actively seek to prevent some members from taking the floor while promoting opportunities for others. In doing so, they attempt to control the message that their partisans convey in parliament. The authors provide a theoretical model to explain the design of procedural rules in parliament, how the party leadership interacts with rebel backbenchers, and how MPs represent voters. The book explores political institutions, intra-party politics, electoral politics and legislative behavior. It develops and tests a new theory of parliamentary debate, using data from the UK, Germany, New Zealand and the European Parliament.

Reviews

‘Political scientists have always taken parliamentary voting seriously. In this highly original book, Proksch and Slapin ask us to give equal consideration to parliamentary speech, and reward us with a host of new insights about the deep connection between electoral dynamics and intra-party politics.'

Christopher Kam - University of British Columbia

‘This innovative book shows the importance of parliamentary debates for understanding intra-party politics. A must-read for those who are interested in party competition and legislative behaviour.'

Daniela Giannetti - University of Bologna

‘The Politics of Parliamentary Debate puts at center stage a major element of parliamentary activities, namely floor deliberation. Sven-Oliver Proksch and Jonathan Slapin cogently argue that speeches hardly affect policy-making proper, but that they play an important role in interactions between members of parliament on the one hand and parties, interest groups and voters on the other. Drawing on an innovative theoretical framework, a host of empirical data and novel techniques, the authors convincingly show the important, though often neglected, role parliamentary debate plays. Thus, for both parliamentary scholars and, more broadly, researchers interested in comparative politics, this book offers an innovative new take on parliaments.'

Simon Hug - Université de Genève

'This is a fascinating book. The authors formulate a simple and plausible theory about what is at stake in parliamentary debates, for parties and individual legislators. The empirical evidence is based on an amazing set of comparisons: across countries, across parties, over time, across types of MPs, across time for the same individual legislators. This is social research at its very best.'

André Blais - University of Montreal

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
Aarts, Kees, and Thomassen, Jacques. 2008. “Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter?Electoral Studies 27(1): 518.
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich, John H., and McKelvey, Richard D.. 1977. “A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections.American Political Science Review 71(1): 111130.
Alivizatos, Nikos. 1990. “The Difficulties of ‘Rationalization’ in a Polarized Political System: The Greek Chamber of Deputies.” In Parliament and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey, ed. Liebert, Ulrike, and Cotta, Maurizio. Pinter, 131153.
Ames, Barry. 1995. “Electoral Strategy under Open-List Proportional Representation.American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 406433.
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. University of Michigan Press.
Anderson, Christopher J., and Guillory, Christine A.. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.American Political Science Review 91(1): 6681.
Austen-Smith, David. 1990. “Information Transmission in Debate.American Journal of Political Science 34(1): 124152.
Austen-Smith, David, and Feddersen, Timothy. 2006. “Deliberation, Preference Uncertainty and Voting Rules.American Political Science Review 100(2): 209217.
Bächtiger, André, and Hangartner, Dominik. 2010. “When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Political Deliberation.Political Studies 58(4): 609629.
Barker, Fiona, Boston, Jonathan, Levine, Stephen, McLeay, Elizabeth, and Roberts, Nigel S.. 2001. “An Initial Assessment of the Consequences of MPP in New Zealand.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew and Wattenberg, Martin. Oxford University Press, pp. 297322.
Bawn, Kathleen, and Thies, Michael F.. 2003. “A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives: Representing the Unorganized under PR, Plurality, and Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(1): 532.
BBC. 2009. “MP Suspended after Mace Protest (15 January 2009).http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7830937.stm.
Benoit, Kenneth, Laver, Michael, and Mikhaylov, Slava. 2009. “Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions.American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 495513.
Bernauer, Julian, and Bräuninger, Thomas. 2009. “Intra-Party Preference Heterogeneity and Faction Membership in the 15th German Bundestag: A Computational Text Analysis of Parliamentary Speeches.German Politics 18(3): 385402.
Blais, André, and Bodet, Marc André. 2006. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence between Citizens and Policy Makers?Comparative Political Studies 39(10): 12431262.
Boston, Jonathan, Levine, Stephen, McLeay, Elizabeth, and Roberts, Nigel S.. 1996. New Zealand under MMP: A New Politics? Auckland University Press.
Bowler, Shaun. 2000. “Parties in Legislatures: Two Competing Explanations.” In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M.P.. Oxford University Press, pp. 157179.
Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael D.. 2007. “Election and Party System Effects on Policy Representation: Bringing Time into a Comparative Perspective.Electoral Studies 26(1): 168179.
Bundesfinanzministerium. 2008. “Schutzschirm für Arbeitsplätze. Die Bundesregierung stärkt mit 15 Maßnahmen die Wirtschaft, sichert Arbeitsplätze und entlastet private Haushalte (5 November 2008).www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/nn_69120/DE/Buergerinnen_und_Buerger/Gesellschaft_und_Zukunft/themenschwerpunkt_konjunkturpakete/073_Schutzschirm_arbeitsplaetze.html?_nnn=true.
Bundestag. 1998. “Die Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages 1.-13. Wahlperiode.Materialien des Wissenschaftlichen Dienstes des Deutschen Bundestages 127.
Butler, David, and Butler, Gareth. 2005. British Political Facts since 1979. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Harvard University Press.
Carey, John M. 2007. “Competing Principals: Political Institutions and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92107.
Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.Electoral Studies 14(4): 417439.
Carrubba, Clifford J., Gabel, Matthew J., and Hug, Simon. 2008. “Legislative Voting Behavior, Seen and Unseen: A Theory of Roll-Call Vote Selection.Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(4): 543572.
Carrubba, Clifford J., Gabel, Matthew J., Murrah, Lacey, Clough, Ryan, Montgomery, Elizabeth, and Schambach, Rebecca. 2006. “Off the Record: Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias and Roll-Call Vote Analysis.British Journal of Political Science 36(4): 691704.
CDU/CSU. 2005. “Arbeitsordnung der CDU/CSU Bundestagsfraktion der 16. Wahlperiode (28 November 2005).www.cducsu.de.
Chang, Eric C.C., and Golden, Miriam A.. 2007. “Electoral Systems, District Magnitude and Corruption.British Journal of Political Science 37(1): 115137.
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.American Political Science Review 98(2): 355370.
Corbett, Richard, Jacobs, Francis, and Shackleton, Michael. 2007. The European Parliament. 7th ed. John Harper.
Cox, Gary. 2006. “The Organization of Democratic Legislatures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, ed. Weingast, Barry, and Wittman, Donald. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 141161.
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. The Legislative Leviathan. University of California Press.
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W., and Thies, Michael F.. 1998. “The Cost of Intraparty Competition: The Single, Nontrasferable Vote and Money Politics in Japan.Comparative Political Studies 31(3): 267291.
Cox, Karen E., and Schoppa, Leonard J.. 2002. “Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Theory and Evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy.Comparative Political Studies 35(9): 10271053.
Crisp, Brian, Escobar-Lemmon, Maria, Jones, Bradford, Jones, Mark, and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle. 2004. “Vote-Seeking Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies.Journal of Politics 66(3): 823846.
Cronbach, Lee J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.Psychometrika 16(3): 297334.
Dalton, Russell J., Farrell, David M., and McAllister, Ian. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Denemark, David. 2001. “Choosing MMP in New Zealand: Explaining the 1993 Electoral Reform.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew and Wattenberg, Martin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7095.
Bundestag, Deutscher. 2011 a. “130. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Donnerstag, 29 September 2011. Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 1.www.bundestag.de/bundestag/plenum/abstimmung/20110929_euro.pdf.
Bundestag, Deutscher. 2011b. “Stenografischer Bericht. 130. Sitzung (17/130). 29 September 2011.http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/17/17130.pdf.
Dewan, Torun, and Myatt, David P.. 2008. “The Qualities of Leadership: Direction, Communication, and Obfuscation.American Political Science Review 102(3): 351368.
Die Welt. 2011. “‘Für mich war klar, Berlin muss Hauptstadt sein’ (Interview with Wolfgang Schäuble, 19 June 2011).www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article13438037/Fuer-mich-war-klar-Berlin-muss-Hauptstadt-sein.html.
Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy. 1998. “Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure.American Political Science Review 92(3): 611621.
Diermeier, Daniel, Godbout, Jean-François, Yu, Bei, and Kaufmann, Stefan. 2012. “Language and Ideology in Congress.British Journal of Political Science 42(1): 3155.
Döring, Herbert. 1995. “Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda.” In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, ed. Döring, Herbert. Campus Verlag, pp. 223246.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper.
Eurogroup. 2010. “Terms of Reference of the Eurogroup: European Financial Stability Facility (7 June 2010).www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/misc/114977.pdf.
Ezrow, Lawrence. 2010. Linking Citizens and Parties: How Electoral Systems Matter for Political Representation. Oxford University Press.
Farrell, David. 2011. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
FDP. 2005. “Geschäftsordnung der FDP Fraktion im Deutschen Bundestag beschlossen am 12.11.1991 zuletzt geändert am 13.12.2005.www.fdp-fraktion.de.
Ferrara, Federico, and Herron, Erik S.. 2005. “Going It Alone? Strategic Entry under Mixed Electoral Rules.American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 1631.
Follesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. 2006. “Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533562.
Gallagher, Michael, and Marsh, Michael, eds. 1988. Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. Sage.
Gallagher, Michael, and Mitchell, Paul, eds. 2005. The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, Michael, Laver, Michael, and Mair, Peter. 2006. Representative Government in Modern Europe. McGraw-Hill.
Gay, Oonagh. 2009. “Members since 1979.House of Commons Library Research Paper 09/31.
Giannetti, Daniela, and Laver, Michael. 2005. “Policy Positions and Jobs in the Government.European Journal of Political Research 44(1): 91120.
Golder, Matthew, and Stramski, Jacek. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 90106.
Greens. 2007. “Geschäftsordnung der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen im Bundestag, beschlossen am 27.9.2005, geändert mit Beschluss vom 5.9.2007.GRÜNE Bundestagsfraktion.
Gschwend, Thomas, Schmitt, Hermann, Wüst, Andreas, and Zittel, Thomas. 2005. German Candidate Survey, Bundestag Election 2005 (ZA4923 data set). Mannheim Center for European Social Research (MZES) and GESIS Cologne.
Guardian. 2009. “Labour Survives Vote on Heathrow Expansion but 28 MPs Join Revolt (29 January 2009).www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jan/28/labour-survives-heathrow-expansion-vote.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vols. 1 & 2. Beacon Press.
Hall, Richard L. 1998. Participation in Congress. Yale University Press.
Harris, Douglas B. 2005. “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-Based View of One-Minute Speeches.Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(1): 127141.
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Rahat, Gideon. 2006. “The Influence of Candidate Selection Methods on Legislatures and Legislators: Theoretical Propositions, Methodological Suggestions and Empirical Evidence.The Journal of Legislative Studies 12(3): 366385.
Herron, Erik S. 2002. “Electoral Influences on Legislative Behavior in Mixed-Member Systems: Evidence from Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada.Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(3): 361382.
Hix, Simon. 2002. “Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament.American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 688698.
Hix, Simon. 2004. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.World Politics 56(1): 194223.
Hix, Simon, and Marsh, Michael. 2007. “Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections.Journal of Politics 69(2): 495510.
Hix, Simon, and Noury, Abdul. 2009. “After Enlargement: Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament.Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(2): 159174.
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gerard. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
HM Treasury. 2008. Pre-Budget Report. Facing Global challenges: Supporting People through Difficult Times. The Stationery Office (CM 7484).
Hopkins, Daniel J., and King, Gary. 2010. “A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science.American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 229247.
Huber, John D. 1996. “The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies.American Political Science Review 90(2): 269282.
Huber, John D., and Bingham Powell, G.. 1994. “Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.World Politics 46(3): 291326.
Hug, Simon. 2010. “Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes.British Journal of Political Science 40(1): 225235.
Hug, Simon, and Martin, Danielle. 2012. “How Electoral Systems Affect MPs’ Positions.Electoral Studies 38:192200.
Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Lau, Olivia. 2007. “negbin: Negative Binomial Regression for Event Count Dependent Variables.” In Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software. http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig.
Jensen, Christian B., Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2013. “Parliamentary Questions, Oversight, and National Opposition Status in the European Parliament.Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(2): 259282.
Kam, Christopher J. 2009. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Karp, Jeffrey. 2002. “Members of Parliament and Representation.” In Proportional Representation on Trial: The 1999 New Zealand General Election and the Fate of MMP, ed. Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Karp, Jeffrey, Banducci, Susan, Miller, Raymond, and Sullivan, Ann. Auckland University Press, pp. 130145.
Karp, Jeffrey. 2009. “Candidate Effects and Spill-Over in Mixed Systems: Evidence from New Zealand.Electoral Studies 28(1): 4150.
Katz, Richard S. 1986. “Intraparty Preference Voting.” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, ed. Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend. Agathon Press, pp. 85103.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. University of Chicago Press.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1999. “Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Norris, Pippa. Oxford University Press, pp. 3156.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford University Press.
Koger, Gregory. 2010. Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate. University of Chicago Press.
Kreppel, Amie. 2002. The European Parliament and Supranational Party System. Cambridge University Press.
Laver, Michael, and Benoit, Kenneth. 2002. “Locating TDs in Policy Spaces: Wordscoring Daíl Speeches.Irish Political Studies 17(1): 5973.
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth, and Garry, John. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.American Political Science Review 97(2): 311332.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.
Lindstädt, René, Slapin, Jonathan B., and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2011. “Balancing Competing Demands: Position Taking and Election Proximity in the European Parliament.Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1): 3770.
Lindstädt, René, Slapin, Jonathan B., and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2012. “Adaptive Behaviour in the European Parliament: Learning to Balance Competing Demands.European Union Politics 13(4).
Londregan, John. 2002. “Appointment, Reelection, and Autonomy in the Senate of Chile.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. Cambridge University Press, pp. 341376.
Maltzman, Forrest, and Sigelman, Lee. 1996. “The Politics of Talk: Unconstrained Floor Time in the US House of Representatives.The Journal of Politics 58(3): 819830.
Marsh, Michael. 1998. “Testing the Second-Order Election Model after Four European Elections.British Journal of Political Science 28(4): 591607.
Marsh, Michael. 2000. “Candidate Centred by Party Wrapped: Campaigning in Ireland under STV.” In Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote, ed. Bowler, Shaun and Grofman, Bernard. University of Michigan Press, pp. 114130.
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2006. “Applied Bayesian Inference in R Using MCMCpack.R News 6(1): 27.
Martin, Andrew D., Quinn, Kevin M., and Park, Jong Hee. 2011. “MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R.Journal of Statistical Software 42(9): 121.
Martin, John E. 2006. “A Shifting Balance: Parliament, the Executive and the Evolution of Politics in New Zealand.Australasian Parliamentary Review 21(2): 113131.
Martin, Lanny W., and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2001. “Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 3350.
Martin, Lanny W., and Vanberg, Georg. 2008. “Coalition Government and Political Communication.Political Research Quarterly 61: 502516.
Martin, Lanny W., and Vanberg, Georg. 2011. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford University Press.
Martin, Shane. 2010. “Electoral Rewards for Personal Vote Cultivation under PR-STV.West European Politics 33(2): 369380.
Martin, Shane. 2011. “Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case.Political Studies 59(2): 472488.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale University Press.
McDonald, Michael D., and Budge, Ian. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford University Press.
McKay, William, ed. 2004. Erskine May’s Treatise on The Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament. 23rd ed. Lexis Nexis Butterworths.
Mill, John Stuart. 1991. Considerations on Representative Government. Promethus Books (originally published in 1861).
Monroe, Burt L., Colaresi, Michael, and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2008. “Fightin’ Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict.Political Analysis 16(4): 372403.
Monroe, Burt L., and Maeda, Ko. 2004. “Talk’s Cheap: Text-Based Estimation of Rhetorical Ideal-Points.” 21st Meeting, Society for Political Methodology, July 2931.
Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll Call Voting in the United States and Latin America’s Southern Cone. Cambridge University Press.
Morris, Jonathan S. 2001. “Reexamining the Politics of Talk: Partisan Rhetoric in the 104th House.Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(1): 101121.
Müller, Wolfgang C., and Strøm, Kaare, eds. 1999. Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge University Press.
Nagel, Jack H. 2004. “New Zealand: Reform by (Nearly) Immaculate Design.” In Handbook of Electoral System Choice, ed. Colomer, Josep M.. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 530543.
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., Kennedy, Ryan P., Lazer, David M.J., and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2010. “Who Wants to Deliberate – and Why?American Political Science Review 104(3): 566583.
New Zealand Parliament. 2012. “Speakers’ Rulings. 1876 to 2011 Inclusive.” Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, New Zealand Parliament.
Norris, Pippa. 1999. “Institutional Explanations for Political Support.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Norris, Pippa. Oxford University Press, pp. 217235.
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa, and Luvenduski, Joni. 2001. “The British Representation Study, 2001.” Available at www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/datafiles/BRS2001.zip.
Page, Benjamin. 1996. Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. University of Chicago Press.
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.American Journal of Political Science 29(2): 357384.
Poole, Keith, Rosenthal, Howard, Lewis, Jeffrey, Lo, James, and Carroll, Royce. 2010. “basicspace: A Package to Recover a Basic Space from Issue Scales.Ver. 0.01.
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. Yale University Press.
Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.Annual Review of Political Science 7: 273296.
Powell, G. Bingham. 2009. “The Ideological Congruence Controversy.Comparative Political Studies 42(12): 14751497.
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2010. “Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches.British Journal of Political Science 40(3): 587611.
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2011. “Parliamentary Questions and Oversight in the European Union.European Journal of Political Research 50(1): 5379.
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2012. “Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech.American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 520537.
Quinn, Kevin M., Monroe, Burt L., Colaresi, Michael, Crespin, Michael H., and Radev, Dragomir. 2010. “How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs.American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 209228.
Rahat, Gideon, and Hazan, Reuven Y.. 2001. “Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework.Party Politics 7(3): 297322.
Rahat, G. Hazan, R.Y., and Katz, R.S.. 2008. “Democracy and Political Parties: On the Uneasy Relationships between Participation, Competition and Representation.Party Politics 14(6): 663.
Rasch, Bjørn Erik. 2000. “Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe.Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(1): 323.
Rasch, Bjørn Erik, and Tsebelis, George, eds. 2011. The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting. Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science.
Raunio, Tapio. 2000. “Losing Independence or Finally Gaining Recognition? Contacts between MEPs and National Parties.” Party Politics 6(2): 211223.
Reif, Karlheinz. 1984. “National Election Cycles and European Elections, 1979 and 1984.Electoral Studies 3(3): 244255.
Reif, Karlheinz, and Schmitt, Hermann. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.European Journal of Political Research 8(1): 345.
Roberts, Jason M. 2007. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll-Call Data: A Cautionary Tale.Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(3): 341360.
Ryckewaert, Laura. 2013. “Tory Backbenchers Voice Support for a House Committee to Better Protect MPs’ Freedom, Powers in Commons.The Hill Times Weekly 22 April.
Salmond, Robert C. 2007. Parliamentary Question Times: How Legislative Accountability Mechanisms Affect Citizens and Politics. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
Scarrow, Susan. 1997. “Political Career Paths and Their Consequences in the European Parliament.Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(2): 253263.
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2005. “Measuring Ideas More Effectively: An Analysis of Bush and Kerry’s National Security Speeches.PS: Political Science and Politics 38(4): 701711.
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2008. “The Constitutional Debate on Partial-Birth Abortion: Constitutional Gravitas and Moral Passion.British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 383410.
Schreiner, Hermann J. 2005. “Die Berliner Stunde – Funktionsweise und Erfahrungen: Zur Redeordnung des Deutschen Bundestages.Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 36(3): 573588.
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.The American Political Science Review 81(1): 85104.
Shugart, Matthew S. 2003. “Extreme Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed-Member Alternative.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Oxford University Press, pp. 2554.
Shugart, M.S., Valdini, M.E., and Suominen, K.. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 437449.
Shugart, Matthew S., and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. 2003. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford University Press.
Slapin, Jonathan B., and Proksch, Sven-Oliver. 2008. “A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts.American Journal of Political Science 52(3): 705722.
Smith, Steven. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. The Brookings Institution.
SPD. 2004. “Beschluss zum Selbstverständnis der Fraktion vom 23.6.1981 in der Fassung vom 19.5.1992.” In Das Regierungssystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ed. Hesse, Joachim J. and Ellwein, Thomas. De Gruyter, p. 466.
Spiegel Online. 2011. “Euro Abweichler erzürnen die Parteigranden (29 September 2011).www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,789100,00.html.
Steiner, Jürg, Bächtiger, André, Spörndli, Markus, and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Stern. 2011. “Zoff um Redezeit für Rebellen (29 September 2011).www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/euro-abstimmung-im-bundestag-zoff-umredezeit-fuer-rebellen-1733571.html.
Stewart, John. 2010. “Victory against All the Odds: The Story of How the Campaign to Stop a Third Runway at Heathrow Was Won.http://hacan.org.uk/resources/reports/victory.pdf.
Stone, Walter J., and Simas, Elizabeth N.. 2010. “Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in the U.S. House Elections.American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 371388.
Strøm, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang C., and Bergman, Torbjörn, eds. 2003. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford University Press.
Stuttgarter Zeitung. 2011. “‘Auch Minderheiten haben Rechte’ (Interview with Norbert Lammert, 5 October 2011).www.stuttgarterzeitung.de/inhalt.interview-mit-norbert-lammert-auch-minderheitenhaben-rechte.1136cfc4-1de3-482e-ab5a-7f6424777e58.html.
Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2011. “Abstimmung über Euro-Rettungsschirm –Rotkäppchen unter Fraktionszwang (28 September 2011).www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/abstimmung-ueber-euro-rettungsschirmrotkaeppchen-unter-fraktionszwang-1.1151514.
Thames, Frank, and Edwards, Martin. 2006. “Differentiating Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Mixed-Member Majoritartian and Mixed-Member Proportional Systems and Government Expenditures.Comparative Political Studies 39(7): 905927.
Thomas, Matt, Pang, Bo, and Lee, Lillian. 2006. “Get Out the Vote: Determining Support or Opposition from Congressional Floor-Debate Transcripts.Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Conference, pp. 327335.
Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497520.
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. University of California Press.
Tsebelis, George. 1999. “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis.American Political Science Review 93(3): 591608.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Russell Sage/Princeton University Press.
UK Hansard. 2009. “Daily Hansard – Debate on 15 January 2009, column 367.www.parliament.uk/business/publications/hansard.
Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Catt, Helena, Lamare, Jim, and Miller, Raymond. 1995. Towards Consensus? The 1993 General Election and Referendum in New Zealand and the Transition to Proportional Representation. Auckland University Press.
Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Karp, Jeffrey, Banducci, Susan, Miller, Raymond, and Sullivan, Ann, eds. 2002. Proportional Representation on Trial: The 1999 New Zealand General Election and the Fate of MMP. Auckland University Press.
Vowles, Jack, Banducci, Susan A., and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2006. “Forecasting and Evaluating the Consequences of Electoral Change in New Zealand.Acta Politica 41(3): 267284.
Welt Online. 2011. “Heftiges Nachspiel nach Rederecht für Euro-Rebellen (29 September 2011).www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article13633653/Heftiges-Nachspiel-nach-Rederecht-fuer-Euro-Rebellen.html.
Wüst, Andreas M., Schmitt, Hermann, Gschwend, Thomas, and Zittel, Thomas. 2006. “Candidates in the 2005 Bundestag Election: Mode of Candidacy, Campaigning and Issues.German Politics 15(4): 420438.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed