Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: December 2014

14 - Wireless underground sensor networks

Summary

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs), due to their unique features such as fault tolerance, scalability, low production cost, and secured transmission, have found applications over widespread domains. Underground sensor networks have their constituent sensor nodes deployed underground, and are designed to operate underneath the earth’s surface. Each of these nodes is equipped with a processor, a finite local storage memory, a radio, an antenna, and a power source unit. Underground sensor networks can be broadly classified into two categories, based on their data dissemination modes, namely, wired underground sensor networks, and wireless underground sensor networks (WUGSNs) [1–3]. Wired underground sensor networks [1–19] are composed of sensing devices, a small processor, limited memory, an antenna, and a power source. These devices are connected to data loggers on the surface by using wires. Data loggers act as transceivers between the sensors and the central data sink. At the receiver end, the data loggers receive and store data that are disseminated from the underground sensor devices. These data are then transmitted to a central data sink or network administrator site by the data loggers for further interpretation and analysis. On the other hand, WUGSNs consist of multiple wireless sensor nodes, each having a sensing unit, a local processing unit, a local storage memory, a radio, an antenna, and a constant source of power. Each of these nodes is capable of acting independently for transmitting the sensed data to the data sink. The nodes establish a multi-hop wireless communication network to ensure reliable and secured dissemination of sensed data.

The general applications of WUGSNs involve real-time soil monitoring in agricultural applications, measuring toxicity of soil for environment monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, underground mine detection, and border surveillance [1–3]. A WUGSN can effectively replace a traditional wired underground sensor network, as it overcomes most of the shortcomings of its wired counterpart. Unlike wired underground sensor networks [2], WUGSNs do not require concealment of sensing devices in order to protect them from environmental hazards, theft, and other issues of insecurity. WUGSNs are easy to deploy, and are cost effective in comparison to wired underground sensor networks. Moreover, WUGSNs are able to disseminate real-time data with higher reliability and security. Coverage density of WUGSN is also comparatively high, and any failure in a WUGSN can be detected with ease. Owing to these unequivocal advantages, WUGSNs can efficiently replace the wired underground sensor networks in most of their fields of applications. In this chapter, we focus on WUGSNs and their design, architecture, and application areas.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Principles of Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Online ISBN: 9781139030960
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030960
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y. and Cayirci, E., “Wireless sensor networks: a survey,” Computer Networks Journal (Elsevier), Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 393–422, March 2002.
Akyildiz, I. F. and Stuntebeck, E. P., “Wireless underground sensor networks: research challenges,” Ad-Hoc Networks Journal (Elsevier), Vol. 4, pp. 669–686, July 2006.
Akyildiz, I. F., Sun, Z. and Vuran, M. C., “Signal propagation techniques for wireless underground communication networks,” Physical Communication Journal (Elsevier), Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 167–183, Sept. 2009.
Chen, W., Sun, Y. and Xu, H., “Clustering chain-type topology for wireless underground sensor networks,” in Proceedings of 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Jinan, China, July 6–9 2010.
Li, M. and Liu, Y., “Underground structure monitoring with wireless sensor networks,” in 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (ISPN), 2007.
Niu, X., Huang, X., Zhao, Z., et al., “The design and evaluation of a wireless sensor network for mine safety monitoring,” in Global Telecommunications Conference, 2007, GLOBECOM’07 IEEE, 2007.
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Channel modeling and analysis for wireless networks in underground mines and road tunnels,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 58, No. 6, June 2010.
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Magnetic induction communications for wireless underground sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 58, No.7, July 2010.
Sun, Z. and Akyildiz, I. F., “Underground wireless communication using magnetic induction,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications 2009, ICC 09, pp. 1–5, 2009.
Yarkan, S. and Arslan, H., “Statistical wireless channel propagation characteristics in underground mines at 900MHz,” in IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2007, MILCOM 2007, pp. 1–7, 2007.
Cerasoli, C., “RF propagation in tunnel environments,” in Proceedings IEEE Military Communications Conference, MILCOM’04, Vol. 1, pp. 363–369, Nov. 2004.
Porrat, D., “Radio propagation in hallways and streets for UHF communications,” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2002.
Emslie, A. G., Lagace, R. L. and Strong, P. F., “Theory of the propagation of UHF radio waves in coal mine tunnels,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 192–205, 1975.
Zhang, Y. P., Zheng, G. X. and Sheng, J. H., “Excitation of UHF radio waves in tunnels,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 408–410, 1999.
Sojdehei, J., Wrathal, P. and Dinn, D., “Magneto-inductive (MI) communications,” in OCEANS, 2001. MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition, Vol. 1, pp. 513–519, 2001.
Kredo, K. and Mohapatra, P., “Medium access control in wireless sensor networks,” Computer Networks (Elsevier), Vol. 51, No. 4, March 2007.
Biswas, S. and Momis, R., ExOR: Opportunistic Multihop Routing for Wireless Networks, SIGCOMM’05, Pennsylvania, USA, 2005.
Mehmet, L. L., Vurany, C. and Akyildiz, I. F.Characteristics of underground channel for wireless underground sensor networks,” Physical Communication, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 167–183, Sept. 2009.
Bhattacharjee, S., Roy, P., Ghosh, S., Misra, S. and Obaidat, M. S, “Wireless sensor network-based fire detection, alarming, monitoring and prevention system for Bord-and-Pillar coal mines,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 85 (3), pp. 571–581, March 2012.