In any society the dominant groups are the ones with the most to hide about the way society works. Very often therefore truthful analyses are bound to have a critical ring, to seem like exposures rather than objective statements… For all students of human society sympathy with the victims of historical processes and skepticism about the victors' claims provide essential safeguards against being taken in by the dominant mythology. A scholar who tries to be objective needs these feelings as part of his working equipment.
“We have 50 percent of the world's wealth, but only 6.3 percent of its population… In this situation we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment,” noted George Kennan in 1948. “Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will allow us to maintain this position of disparity,” said the then Director of Policy Planning of the Department of State. “We should cease to talk about the raising of the living standards, human rights, and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better.”
Kennan's candid statement emphasizes that the strategic objective of US foreign policy during the Cold War was less battling a “communist menace” than defending the tremendous privilege and power this global disparity of wealth brought it as the dominant world power, and suggests that democracy abroad was not a major consideration for the United States in the formative years of the post-World War II order.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.