Skip to main content
Proof of Causation in Tort Law
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Steel, Sandy 2015. Justifying Exceptions to Proof of Causation in Tort Law. The Modern Law Review, Vol. 78, Issue. 5, p. 729.

  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Proof of Causation in Tort Law
    • Online ISBN: 9781107273689
    • Book DOI:
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Causation is a foundational concept in tort law: in claims for compensation, a claimant must demonstrate that the defendant was a cause of the injury suffered in order for compensation to be awarded. Proof of Causation in Tort Law provides a critical, comparative and theoretical analysis of the general proof rules of causation underlying the tort laws of England, Germany and France, as well as the exceptional departures from these rules which each system has made. Exploring the different approaches to uncertainty over causation in tort law, Sandy Steel defends the justifiability of some of these exceptions, and categorises and examines the kinds of exceptional rules suggested by the case law and literature. Critically engaged with both the theoretical literature and current legal doctrine, this book will be of interest to private law scholars, judges and legal practitioners.


'Steel’s comprehensive scholarship and razor-sharp analysis promises to bring some much-needed clarity to an area of the law in dire need of reform. I hope and expect it will be widely read.'

Alex Kaiserman Source: Cambridge Law Journal

'Dr Steel has been able to survey the field and test the various parts for consistency, normative justification, practicality and morality. He has been able to bring to bear a huge quantity of literature in English, French and German. His bibliography, by my count, runs to over 800 separate items. All this with remarkable clarity and conciseness. If, as seems all too likely, there are to be further difficult cases on causation, the judiciary will at least be able to test their intuitions against the analysis in this book.'

Lord Hoffmann Source: Law Quarterly Review

'A very substantial contribution to the literature …'

Chris Miller Source: Professional Negligence

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Anderson, T., Schum, D., and Twining, W. Analysis of Evidence 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Aubry, C. and Rau, C. Droit Civil Français Book Six 6th edition (Esmein, P. (ed.)) (Paris: Librairies Techniques Juris-Classeurs, 1951)
Balkin, R.P. and Davis, J.L.R. Law of Torts 4th edition (London: Butterworths, 2008)
Ballot-Léna, A. La Responsabilité Civile en Droit Des Affaires Des Régimes Spéciaux Vers Un Droit Commun (Paris: LGDJ, 2008)
Barker, K., Cane, P., Lunney, M., and Trindade, F. The Law of Torts in Australia 5th edition (Oxford University Press, 2011)
Beever, A. Rediscovering the Law of Negligence (Oxford: Hart, 2007)
Bénabent, A. Droit Civil: Les Obligations 12th edition (Paris: Montchrestien, 2010)
Bénabent, A. La Chance et Le Droit (Paris: LGDJ, 1973)
Bennett, J. Events and Their Names (Oxford University Press, 1988)
Brinkmann, M. Das Beweismaß im Zivilprozess aus rechtsvergleichender Sicht (Cologne: Heymanns, 2005)
Broome, J. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time (Oxford: Basil Blackwell Press, 1991)
Burrows, A. The Law of Restitution 3rd edition (Oxford University Press, 2011)
Buxbaum, W. Solidarische Schadenshaftung bei ungeklärter Verursachung im deutsche, französichen und anglo-amerikanischen Recht (Karlsruhe: CF Müller, 1965)
Bydlinski, F. Probleme der Schadensverursachung nach deutschem und österreichischem Recht (Stuttgart: F Enke, 1964)
Cane, P. Atiyah's Accidents, Compensation and the Law 8th edition (Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Cane, P. Responsibility in Law and Morality (Oxford: Hart, 2002)
Cane, P. The Anatomy of Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 1997)
Cane, P., Lunney, M., and Trindade, F. The Law of Torts in Australia 4th edition (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Chabas, F. L'influence de la pluralité de causes sur le droit à la réparation (Paris: LGDJ, 1967)
Chartier, Y. La réparation du préjudice (Paris: Dalloz 1983)
Chatelain, C. La Théorie de la Perte de Chance en Droit Hospitalier (Thesis, Lille, 2002)
Clerk, J.F. (Jones, M. ed.) Clerk & Lindsell on Torts 19th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)
Clerk, J.F. Clerk & Lindsell on Torts 20th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010)
Clerk, J.F. Clerk & Lindsell on Torts 21st edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2014)
Cohen, L.J. The Probable and the Provable (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977)
Coleman, J. Risks and Wrongs (Cambridge University Press, 1992)
Coleman, J. The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2001)
Cooter, R. and Porat, A. Getting Incentives Right Improving Torts, Contracts, and Restitution (Princeton University Press, 2014)
Cranor, C.F. Toxic Torts: Science, Law and the Possibility of Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Cross, R. and Tapper, C. Cross & Tapper on Evidence 12th edition (Oxford University Press, 2010)
Darwall, S. Welfare and Rational Care (Princeton University Press, 2002)
Deakin, S., Johnston, A., and Markesinis, B. Markesinis and Deakin’s Tort Law 7th edition (Oxford University Press, 2013)
Demarez, J. L'indemnisation du dommage occasionné par un member inconnu d'un groupe determine (Paris: LGDJ, 1967)
Demogue, R. Traité des Obligations en Général Tomes III-IV (Paris: Librairie Arthur Rousseau, 1924)
Descheemaeker, E. The Division of Wrongs (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Deutsch, E. Haftungsrecht: Erster Band: Allgemeine Lehren (Cologne, Germany: Carl Heymanns, 1976)
Deutsch, E. and Spickhoff, A. Medizinrecht 6th edition (Berlin: Springer, 2008)
Dobbs, D. The Law of Torts (St. Paul, MN: West, 2000)
Douglas, S. Liability for Wrongful Interference with Chattels (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Dowe, P.A Counterfactual Theory of Prevention and “Causation” By Omission’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79 (2001), 216
Dressler, J. Understanding Criminal Law 4th edition (New York: Bender & Co, 2006)
Dworkin, R.M. Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011)
Dworkin, R.M. Law's Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986)
Dwyer, D. The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence (Cambridge University Press, 2008)
Ehlgen, C. Probabilistische Proportionalhaftung und Haftung für den Verlust von Chancen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013)
Emson, R. Evidence 4th edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)
Epstein, R. Cases and Materials on Torts 9th edition (New York: Aspen, 2009)
Fabre-Magnan, M. Droit des Obligations: Tome 2 2nd edition (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2010)
Feinberg, J. Harm to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984)
Finnis, J. Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon, 1980)
Fleming, J.G. The Law of Torts 9th edition (Sydney: LBC, 1999)
Fletcher, G. Rethinking Criminal Law (Boston: Little Brown & Co, 1978)
Franzki, D. Die Beweisregeln im Arzthaftungsprozeß (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1982)
Fröhlich, D. Die Beweisvereitelung im Zivilprozess (Thesis submitted at Julius Maximilian University Würzburg:, 2008)
Fuchs, M. Deliktsrecht 6th edition (Berlin: Springer, 2006)
Fuchs, M. Deliktsrecht 7th edition (Berlin: Springer, 2009)
Gardner, J. Offences and Defences (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Gebauer, M. Hypothetische Kausalität (Tübingen: Mohr, 2007)
Ghestin, J., Goubeaux, G., and Fabre-Magnan, M. Traité de droit civil, Introduction générale 4th edition (Paris: LGDJ, 1994)
Gilead, I., Green, M., and Koch, B. (eds.) Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013)
Gillies, D. Philosophical Theories of Probability (Oxford: Routledge, 2000)
Goldberg, J. and Zipursky, B. Torts: Oxford Introductions to US Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Goldberg, R. Causation and Risk in the Law of Torts: Scientific Evidence and Medicinal Product Liability (Oxford: Hart, 1999)
Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Green, S. Causation in Negligence (Oxford: Hart, 2014)
Großerichter, H. Hypothetischer Geschehensverlauf und Schadensfestellung – Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung vor dem Hintergrund der perte d'une chance (Munich: Beck, 2001)
Guégan-Lécuyer, A. Dommages de Masse et Responsabilité Civile (Paris: LGDJ, 2006)
Hald, A. A History of Probability and Statistics and Their Applications before 1750 (New Jersey: Wiley, 1990)
Hanau, P. Die Kausalität der Pflichtwidrigkeit (Göttingen: Schwartz & Co, 1971)
Harder, Y. Die Beweisfigur des Befunderhebungs-und Befundsicherungsfehlers im Arzthaftungsprozess nach der Rechtsprechung des BGH und der Instanzgerichte (Thesis, Regensburg, 2009)
Hart, H.L.A. Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Hart, H.L.A. and Honoré, T. Causation in the Law 1st edition (Oxford: Clarendon, 1959)
Hart, H.L.A. Causation in the Law 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon, 1985)
Handfield, T. A Philosophical Guide to Chance (Cambridge University Press, 2012)
Hausch, A. Der grobe Behandlungsfehler in der gerichtlichen Praxis: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme (Karlsruhe: Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft, 2007)
Häusler, M. Haftung ohne Kausalitätsnachweis (Dissertation, Universität Wien, 2010)
Hawthorne, J. Knowledge and Lotteries (Oxford University Press, 2005)
Heck, P. Grundriß des Schuldrechts (Tübingen: Mohr, 1929)
Heinrich, E. Haftung bei alternative Kausalität mit Zufall (Vienna: Verlag Osterreich, 2010)
Helbron, H. Entwicklungen und Fehlentwicklungen im Arzthaftungsrecht (Munich: Herbert Utz, 2001)
Hensler, D.R. and Carroll, S. Asbestos Litigation (Cambridge: Rand Institute, 2005)
Hernan, M. and Robins, J. Causal Inference (Online book draft:
Ho, H.L. Philosophy of Evidence Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Hofmann, E. Die Umkehr der Beweislast in der Kausalfrage (Karlsruhe: Verlag Verisicherungswirtschaft, 1972)
Howarth, D. Textbook on Tort (London: Butterworths, 1995)
Hurley, P. Beyond Consequentialism (Oxford University Press, 2010)
Jackson, R. and Powell, J. (and Stewart, R.) Jackson and Powell on Professional Liability 6th edition with 4th supplement (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010)
Jansen, N. Die Struktur des Haftungsrechts (Tübingen: Mohr, 2003)
Kasche, M. Verlust von Heilungschancen – Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1999)
Katzenmeier, C. Arzthaftung (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002)
Keeton, R, Dobbs, D., and Owen, D. Prosser & Keeton on Torts, 5th edition (St. Paul, Mn: West, 1984)
Keren-Paz, T. Torts, Egalitarianism and Distributive Justice (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007)
Keynes, J. A Treatise on Probability (London: Macmillan & Co, 1921)
Khoury, L. Uncertain Causation in Medical Liability (Oxford: Hart, 2006)
Klar, L. Tort Law 3rd edition (Canada: Thomson, 2003)
Klar, L. Tort Law 4th edition (Canada: Thomson, 2008)
Knight, F.H. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1921)
Kötz, H. and Wagner, G. Deliktsrecht, 11th edition (Munich: Vahlen, 2010)
Koziol, H. Grundfragen des Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Jan Sremak Verlag, 2010)
Krüse, C. Alternative Kausalität (Munich: LIT, 2006)
Kyburg, H. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1961)
Lambert-Faivre, Y. and Porchy-Simon, S. Droit du dommage corporel 7th edition (Paris: Dalloz, 2012)
Lange, H. and Schiemann, G. Schadensersatz (Handbuch des Schuldrechts) 3rd edition (Tübingen: Mohr, 2003)
Larenz, K. and Canaris, CW. Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts Band II/2: Besonderer Teil 13th edition (Munich: Beck, 1994)
Laudan, L. Truth, Error and Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Laufs, A., Katzenmeier, C., and Lipp, V. Arztrecht (Munich: Beck, 2009)
LeBrun, P. Responsabilité civile extra-contractuelle 2nd edition (LexisNexis, Litec: Paris, 2009)
Lepa, M. Die Verteilung der Beweislast im Privatrecht und ihre rationelle Begründung (Dissertation, Cologne, 1963)
LeTourneau, P. Droit de la responsabilité et des contrats 7th edition (Paris: Dalloz, 2008)
Linden, A.M. Canadian Tort Law, 7th edition (London: Butterworths, 2002)
Lipton, P. Inference to Best Explanation (London: Routledge, 1993)
Lord, R.A. Williston on Contracts vol 24 4th edition. (Thomson West, 2002)
Lunney, M. and Oliphant, K. Tort Law: Text Cases and Materials 4th edition (Oxford University Press, 2010)
Lunney, M. and Oliphant, K.Tort Law: Text Cases and Materials 5th edition (Oxford University Press, 2013)
Mackie, J.L. The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation (Oxford University Press, 1990)
Maassen, B. Beweismaßprobleme im Schadensersatzprozeß (Carl Heymanns Verlag: Cologne, 1975)
Mäsch, G. Chance und Schaden (Tübingen: Mohr, 2004)
Markesinis, B.S. and Unberath, H. The German Law of Torts (Oxford University Press, 2002)
Markesinis, B.S., Unberath, H., and Johnston, A. The German Law of Contract 2nd edition (Oxford University Press, 2006)
Mazeaud, H. and Mazeaud, L. Traité Théorique et Pratique de la Responsabilité Civile Délictuelle et Contractuelle 3rd edition (Paris: Sirey, 1939)
Mazeaud, H., Mazeaud, L., and Mazeaud, J. Traité Théorique et Pratique de la Responsabilité Civile Délictuelle et Contractuelle Tome II 6th edn (Paris: Montchrestien, 1970)
Mazeaud, H., Mazeaud, L., and Tunc, A. Traité Théorique et Pratique de la Responsabilité Civile Délictuelle et Contractuelle Tome I 6th edition (Paris: Montchrestien, 1965)
McCormick, C.T. McCormick on Evidence 5th edition (Strong, J.W., Broun, K.S., Dix, G.E., Inmwinkelried, E.J., Kaye, D.H., Mosteller, R.P. and Roberts, E.F. Contributors) (St. Paul, Mn: West, 1999)
McBride, N. and Bagshaw, R. Tort Law 3rd edition (London: Pearson, 2008)
McBride, N. Tort Law 4th edition (London: Pearson, 2012)
McGregor, H. McGregor on Damages 18th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2009)
McGregor, H. McGregor on Damages 19th edition (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2014)
Mehring, T. Beteiligung und Rechtswidrigkeit bei 830 I 2 BGB (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2003)
Merkin, R. and Steele, J. Insurance and the Law of Obligations (Oxford University Press, 2013)
Mislawski, R. La Causalité dans la Responsabilité Civile: Recherches sur ses Rapports Avec la Causalité Scientifique (Thesis: University Cergy-Pontoise, 2006)
Mommsen, T. Zur Lehre vom Interesse (Braunschweig: Schwetschke, 1855)
Moore, M. Causation and Responsibility: Essays in Law, Metaphysics and Morals (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Motsch, R. Vom rechtsgenügenden Beweis (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1983)
Mouralis, J.L. Dalloz Civil: Preuve (Paris: Dalloz, 2002)
Müller, C. La Perte d'une Chance (Bern: Staempfli, 2002)
Müller-Stoy, W. Schadensersatz für verlorene Chancen – Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung (Freiburg, Thesis, 1973)
Murphy, J. and Witting, C. Street on Torts, 13th edition (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Neyers, J. and Chamberlain, E. (eds.) Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 2007)
O'Malley, F., et al. (eds.) Federal Jury Practice and Instructions 6th edition (Thomson West, 2009)
Osborne, P.H. The Law of Torts, 2nd edition (Toronto: Carswell, 2003)
Otsuka, M. Libertarianism without Inequality (Oxford University Press, 2003)
Owen, D (ed) Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Tort (Oxford University Press, 1995)
Parfit, D. On What Matters Volumes I & II (Oxford University Press, 2011)
Parfit, D. Reasons and Persons (Oxford University Press, 1984)
Paul, L.A. and Hall, N. Causation: A User's Guide (Oxford University Press, 2013)
Phipson, S.L. (co-contributors: Howard, M.N. and Bagshaw, R.) Phipson on Evidence, 5th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2005)
Planiol, M. and Ripert, G. Traité Pratique de Droit Civil Français Tome VI Obligations 2nd edition, Esmein, P. (ed.) (Paris: LGDJ, 1952)
Porat, A. and Stein, A. Tort Liability under Uncertainty (Oxford University Press, 2001)
Posner, R. and Landes, W. Economic Structure of Tort Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987)
Posner, R. Economic Analysis of Law (Aspen Publishers, 2007)
Pradel, X. Le Préjudice dans le droit civil de la responsabilité (Paris: LGDJ, 2004)
Prütting, H. Gegenwartsprobleme der Beweislast (Munich: CH Beck, 1983)
Quentin, A. Kausalität und deliktische Haftungsbegr?ndung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994)
Quézel-Ambrunaz, C. Essai sur la causalité en droit de la responsabilité civile (Paris: Dalloz, 2010)
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971)
Rawls, J. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2001)
Raz, J. From Normativity to Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2011)
Raz, J. The Practice of Value (Oxford University Press, 2001)
Raz, J. The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988) Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Paperback Edition) (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Restatements (1931–2010 published by the American Law Institute)
Restatements Restatement of Contracts (1931)
Restatements Restatement (Second) Contracts (1981)
Restatements Restatement (Second) Torts (1965–1979)
Restatements Restatement (Third) Torts (1998): Products Liability
Restatements Restatement (Third) Torts (2010): Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm, Volume 1
Riegger, T. Die historische Entwicklung der Arzthaftung (Thesis, Regensburg University, 2007)
Ripstein, A. Equality, Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 1999)
Ripstein, A. Force and Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009)
Röckrath, L. Kausalität, Wahrscheinlichkeit und Haftung (Munich: Beck, 2004)
Rogers, W.V.H. Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort, 17th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)
Rogers, W.V.H. Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort, 18th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2011)
Romerio, F. Toxische Kausalität. Eine rechtsvergleichende und interdisziplinäre Studie (Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1996)
Rothman, K. Epidemiology: An Introduction, 2nd edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012)
Rothman, K., Greenland, S., and Lash, T. Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition (Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2008)
Sappideen, C. and Vines, P. (eds.) Flemming's Law of Torts, 10th edition. (Prymont: Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia, 2010)
Savatier, R. Traité de la Responsabilité Civile en Droit Français Tomes I-II (Paris : LGDJ, 1939)
Scanlon, T.M. What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2000)
Schäfer, H. and Ott, C. Lehruch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechts (Berlin: Springer, 2000)
Schauer, F. Profiles, Probabilities and Stereotypes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006)
Seifert, R. Ärztlicher Behandlungsfehler und schicksalhafter Verlauf: Zur haftungsrechtlichen Bewältigung eines Kausalitätsdilemmas (Baden: Nomos, 2008)
Sen, A. The Idea of Justice (London: Penguin, 2010)
Seyfert, C. Mass Toxic Torts: Zum Problem der kausalen Unaufklärbarkeit toxischer Massenschäden (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2004)
Sick, J. Beweisrecht im Arzthaftungsprozeß (Bern: Peter Lang, 1987)
Spickhoff, A. Folgenzurechnung in Schadensersatzrecht: Gründe und Grenzen (ed. Lorenz, E.) (Karlsruher Forum 2007; Munich: Beck, 2008)
Stapleton, J. Disease and the Compensation Debate (Oxford: Clarendon, 1986)
Stauch, M. The Law of Medical Negligence in England and Germany (Oxford: Hart, 2008)
Steele, J. Risks and Legal Theory (Oxford: Hart, 2004)
Stein, A. Foundations of Evidence Law (Oxford University Press, 2005)
Sträter, J. Grober Behandlungsfehler und Kausalitätsvermutung. Beweislastumkehr ohne medizinwissenschaftliche Basis? (Baden: Nomos, 2006)
Stevens, R. Torts and Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Strong, J.W., Roberts, E.F., Kaye, D.H., and Broun, K.S. (eds.) McCormick on Evidence, 5th edition (St Paul, MN: West, 1999)
Tadros, V. The Ends of Harm (paperback edition) (Oxford University Press, 2013)
Tillers, P, and Green, E. Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence: The Uses and Limits of Bayesianism (Dordrecht: Springer, 1988)
Todd, S., et al. The Law of Torts in New Zealand, 5th edition (London: Thomson Reuters, 2009)
Traeger, L. Der Kausalbegriff im Straf-und Zivilrecht (Marburg: Elwert, 1904)
van Dam, C. European Tort Law, 1st edition (Oxford University Press, 2006)
Viney, G. and Jourdain, P. Les Conditions de la Responsabilité 3rd edition (Paris: LGDJ, 2006)
Viney, G. (with Carval, S.) Les Conditions de la Responsabilité (4th edition, Paris: LGDJ, 2013)
Von Bar, C. The Common European Law of Torts Volume 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000)
Von Bar, C. The Common European Law of Torts Volume 2 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000)
Von Bar, C. Verkehrspflichten (Cologne: Heymanns, 1980)
Wagner, G. Neue Perspektiven im Schadensersatzrecht – Kommerzialisierung, Strafschadensersatz, Kolletivschaden Gutachten A für den 66 Deutschen Juristentag (Munich: Beck, 2006)
Wagner, G. Schadensersatz: Zwecke, Inhalte, Grenzen (Karlsrüher Forum 2006, 2006)
Wahrendorf, V. Die Prinzipien der Beweislast im Haftungsrecht (Köln: Heymann, 1976)
Weber, H. Der Kausalitätsbeweis im Zivilprozeß (Tübingen: Mohr, 1997)
Weinrib, E. The Idea of Private Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995)
Weinrib, E. Corrective Justice 1st edition (Oxford University Press, 2012)
Weir, T. Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002)
Weir, T. Tort Law 2nd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006)
Wilburg, W. Die Elemente des Schadensrechts (Marburg: Elwert, 1941)
Wilhelmi, R. Risikoschutz durch Privatrecht (Tubingen: Mohr, 2009)
Williams, B. Moral Luck (Cambridge University Press, 1981)
Williams, B. Shame and Necessity (California: University of California Press, 1994)
Williamson, T.W. Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford University Press, 2002)
Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B., Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Digest of European Tort Law: vol 1: Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna: Springer, 2007)
Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B., Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Digest of European Tort Law: vol 2: Essential Cases on Damage (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011)
Zuckermann, A. The Principles of Criminal Evidence (Oxford University Press, 1989)
Aberkane, H. ‘Du dommage causé par une personne indéterminée dans un groupe déterminé de personnes’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil (1958)
Aboodi, R., Borer, A., and Enoch, D.Deontology, Individualism, and Uncertainty, a Reply to Jackson and SmithJournal of Philosophy, 105 (2008)
Abraham, K.S.Self-Proving CausationVirginia Law Review, 99 (2013): 1811
Adler, M.D.Risk, Death and Harm: The Normative Foundations of Risk Regulation’, Minnesota Law Review, 87 (2003): 1293
Ahrens, H. ‘Die Verteilung der Beweislast’ in Lorenz, E. (ed.) Karlsruher Forum 2008 (2009)
Alexander, L. and Moore, M. ‘Deontological Theories of Morality’, Zalta, E. (ed) Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007)
Allen, C.Note: Loss of Chance in WyomingWyoming Law Review, 6 (2006): 533
Allen, R.J. ‘Rationality, Algorithms, and Juridical Proof: A Preliminary Enquiry’, The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, (1996–7): 254
Allen, R.J. and Stein, A.Evidence, Probability and the Burden of ProofArizona Law Review, 55 (2013): 557
Amirthalingham, K.Causation and the Gist of NegligenceCambridge Law Journal, 64 (2004): 32
Amirthalingham, K.Causation, Risk and DamageLaw Quarterly Review, 126 (2010): 162
Anscombe, G.E.M.Causality and Determination’ in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind (The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Volume 2) (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981)
Ashworth, A.A Change of Normative Position: Determining the Contours of Culpability in Criminal LawNew Criminal Law Review, 11 (2008): 232
Arens, P.Dogmatik und Praxis der SchadensschätzungZeitschrift für Zivilprozess, 88 (1975): 1
Bacher, K. Entry on Beweisvereitelung in §284 ZPO in Vorwerk, V. and Wolf, C. (eds.) Beck'scher Online-Kommentar ZPO (2012)
Bagchi, A.Distributive Injustice and Private LawHastings Law Jourrnal 60 (2008) 105
Bagshaw, R.Causing the Behaviour of Others and Other Causal Mixtures’ in Goldberg, R. (ed). Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011).
Bailey, S.H.Causation in Negligence: What is a Material Contribution?Legal Studies, 30 (2010): 167
Balaguer, M.Why There are No Good Arguments for any Interesting Version of DeterminismSynthese, 168 (2009): 1
Ballhausen, B.Anwendung der Beweislastumkehr nach den für die Arzthaftung entwickelten Grundsätzen bei einem groben Behandlungsfehler im Rahmen der ArzneimittelhaftungMedizinrecht, 29 (2011): 575
Barker, K.Unfamiliar Waters: Negligent Advocates, Egregious Errors and Lost Chances of AcquittalUniversity of Queensland Law Journal, 24 (2005): 469
Barker, S.Counterfactuals, Probabilistic Counterfactuals and CausationMind, 108 (1999): 427
Bauer, M. ‘Die Problematik gesamtschuldnerischer Haftung trotz ungeklärter Verursachung’ Juristenzeitung, (1971): 4
Baumgartner, M.A Regularity Theoretic Approach to Actual CausationErkenntnis, 78 (2013): 85
Beebee, H.Does Anything Hold the Universe Together?Synthese, 149 (2006): 509
Beever, A.Cause-in-Fact: Two Steps Out of the MireUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 51 (2001): 327
Beever, A.Gregg v Scott and Loss of a ChanceUniversity of Queensland Law Journal, 24 (2005): 201
Beever, A.Policy in Private Law: An Admission of FailureUniversity of Queensland Law Journal, 25 (2006): 287
Ben-Shahar, O.Causation and Foreseeability’ in Faure, M. (ed.) Tort Law and Economic: Volume 1: Encyclopedia of Law and Economics 2nd edition (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009)
Béraud, R. ‘Les Mythes de la Responsabilité Civile’ Semaine Juridique 1964.I.1837
Béraud, R. ‘Quelques difficultés de preuve de la responsabilité délictuelle’ Semaine Juridique 1950.I.870
Berger, M.A.Eliminating General Causation: Notes Toward a New Theory of Justice and Toxic TortsColumbia Law Review, 97 (1997): 2117
Berger, M.A. and Twerski, A.D.Uncertainty and Informed Choice: Unmasking DaubertMichigan Law Review, 104 (2005): 257
Bernstein, A.Asbestos AchievementsSouthwestern University Law Review, 37 (2008): 691
Bernstein, A.Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.: Markets of Mothers’, in Rabin, and Sugarman, (eds). Torts Stories (New York: Foundation Press, 2003)
Bernstein, A.Keep it Simple: An Explanation of the Rule of No Recovery for Pure Economic LossArizona Law Review, 48 (2006): 773
Berryman, J.The Compensation Principle in Private Law’, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 42 (2008): 91
Bernstein, D.Getting to Causation in Toxic Tort CasesBrooklyn Law Review, 74 (2008): 51
Bieri, L. and Marty, P.The Discontinuous Nature of the Loss of a Chance SystemJournal of European Tort Law, 2 (2011): 23
Birks, P.The Concept of Civil Wrong’ in Owen, D. (ed.) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)
Black, V.Decision Causation: Pandora's Tool-Box’, in Chamberlain, Neyers, Pitel, (eds). Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 2007)
Black, V. and Klimchuk, D.Comment on Athey v. Leonati: Causation, Damages, and Thin Skulls’, University of British Columbia Law Review, 31 (1997): 163
Bloch, C. ‘Exposition à un risque et perte de chance’ Semiane Juridique 2010.III.1914–1915
Bloch, C. ‘Exposition à un risque et préjudice moral d'anxiété’ Semaine Juridique 2010.III.1914
Bodewig, T.Probleme Alternative Kausalität bei MassanschadenArchiv für civilistische Praxis, 185 (1985): 505
Boivin, D.Factual Causation in the Law of Manufacturer Failure to WarnOttawa Law Review, 30 (1998): 47
Boon, A.Causation and the Increase of RiskModern Law Review, 51 (1988): 508
Boré, J.L'indemisation pour les chances perdues: une forme d'appréciation quantative de la causalité d'un fait dommageableLa Semaine Juridique 1974.I.2620
Borghetti, J-S. ‘La reparation de la perte d'une chance en droit Suisse et en droit français’ European Review of Private Law, (2008): 1072
Borghetti, JS. ‘Note under Cass Civ 1e, 25 Nov 2010’ Semaine Juridique G.2011.79
Boston, G.A Mass-Exposure Model of Toxic Causation: The Content of Scientific Proof and the Regulatory ExperienceColumbia Journal of Environmental Law, 18 (1993): 181
Boston, G.Apportionment of Harm in Tort Law: A Proposed RestatementUniversity of Dayton Law Review, 21 (1995): 268
Botterell, A. and Essert, C.Normativity, Fairness, and the Problem of Factual UncertaintyOsgoode Hall Law Journal, 47 (2009): 663
Boysen, J.Shifting the Burden of Proof on Causation in Legal Malpractice ActionsSt Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics, 1 (2011): 308
Braun, J.Zur schadensersatzrechtlichen Problematik des hypothetischen Inzidentprozesses bei Regreßklagen gegen den AnwaltZeitschrift für Zivilprozessrecht, 96 (1983): 89
Brehm, W. ‘Zur Haftung bei alternativer Kausalität’ Juristenzeitung, (1980): 585
Brennan, T.A.Causal Chains and Statistical LinksCornell Law Review, 73 (1987–8): 469
Brennan, T.A.Environmental TortsVanderbilt Law Review, 46 (1993): 1
Broadbent, A.Epidemiological Evidence in Proof of Specific CausationLegal Theory, 17 (2011): 237
Brown, C.Consequentialize ThisEthics, 121 (2011): 749.
Brown, R.Material Contribution's Expanding Hegemony: Factual Causation After Hanke v. Resurfice Corp.Canadian Business Law Journal, 45 (2007): 432
Brown, R.The Possibility of “Inference Causation”: Inferring Cause-in-Fact and the Nature of Legal Fact FindingMcGill Law Journal, 55 (2010): 1
Buchak, L.Belief, Credence and NormsPhilosophical Studies, 169 (2014): 285
Buchberger, M. ‘Le role de l'article 1315 du code civil en cas d'inexécution d'un contrat’ Dalloz Doctrine, (2011): 465
Burrows, A.Comparing Compensatory Damages in Tort and Contract’ in Degeling, S., Edelman, J., and Goudkamp, J. Torts in Commercial Law (Law Book Co., 2011)
Burrows, A.Uncertainty about Uncertainty: Damages for Loss of a ChanceJournal of Personal Injury Law, 1 (2008): 31
Bush, RAB.Between Two Worlds: The Shift from Individual to Group Responsibility in the Law of Causation of InjuryUniversity of California Los Angeles Law Review, 33 (1985–6): 1473
Bydlinski, F.Aktuelle Streitfragen um die alternative Kausalität’ in Sandrock, O. (ed.) Festschrift Beitzke (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1979)
Bydlinski, F.Causation as a Legal Phenomenon’ in Tichy, L. (ed.) Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Carlova, 2007)
Bydlinski, F. ‘Haftung bei alternativer Kausalität’ Juristische Blätter, (1959): 1
Bydlinski, F.Haftungsgrund und Zufall als alternative mögliche Schadensursachen’ in Enziger, M., et al. (eds.) Festschrift Frotz (Vienna: Manz, 1993)
Calabresi, G.Concerning Cause and the Law of Torts: An Essay for Harry Kalven, Jr.’, University of Chicago Law Review, 43 (1975): 69
Campbell, D.The End of Posnerian Law and EconomicsThe Modern Law Review, 73 (2010): 305
Canaris, C.W.Die Vermutung “aufklärungsrichtigen Verhaltens” und ihre grundlagen’ in Festschrift für Hadding (Berlin: De Gruyter,2004)
Cane, P.Corrective Justice and Correlativity in Private LawOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 16 (1996): 471
Cane, P. ‘Distributive Justice and Tort Law’ New Zealand Law Review, (2001): 401
Cane, P.The Anatomy of Private Law Theory: A 25th Anniversary EssayOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25 (2005): 203
Cane, P.The General/Special Distinction in Criminal Law, Tort Law, and Legal Theory’, Law and Philosophy, 26 (2007): 465
Carbone, M. and Yang, H.Molecular Pathways: Targeting Mechanisms of Asbestos and Erionite Carcinogenesis in MesotheliomaClinical Cancer Research, 18 (2012): 598
Cartwright, N.Are RCTs the Gold Standard?Biosocieties, 2 (2007): 11
Chabas, F.La perte d'une chance en droit français’ in Guillod, O. (ed.) Colloque Développements récents du droit de la responsabilité civile (Zurich: Schulthess, 1991)
Cheifitz, D.Materially Increasing the Risk of Injury as Factual Cause of InjuryThe Advocates’ Quarterly, 29 (2004): 253
Cheifitz, D. ‘Not Clarifying Causation’ (unpublished, 2011)
Cheifitz, D. and Black, V.Through the Looking Glass, Darkly: Resurfice v. HankeAlberta Law Review, 45 (2007–8): 241
Chignell, A.Belief in KantPhilosophical Review, 116 (2007): 323
Clermont, K.Standards of Proof RevisitedVermont Law Review, 43 (2009): 469
Clermont, K. and Sherwin, E.A Comparative View of Standards of ProofAmerican Journal of Comparative Law, 50 (2002): 243
Cohen, L.J. ‘Subjective Probability and the Paradox of the Gatecrasher’ Arizona State Law Journal, (1981): 627
Coleman, J.Doing Away with TortLoyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 41 (2008): 1149
Coleman, J.Mistakes, Misunderstanding, and MisalignmentsYale Law Journal Online, 121 (2012): 541
Coleman, J.On the Moral Argument for the Fault SystemThe Journal of Philosophy, 71 (1974): 473
Coleman, J.Property, Wrongfulness and the Duty to CompensateChicago-Kent Law Review, 63 (1987): 451
Coleman, J.Tort Law and Tort Theory: Preliminary Reflections on Method’ in Postema, G. Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge University Press, 2001)
Collins, J.Pre-emptive Pre-emption’ in Collins, J., et al. (eds.) Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2004)
Coons, J.E.Approaches to Court Imposed Compromise–The Uses of Doubt and ReasonNorth Western University Law Review, 58 (1964): 750
Coons, J.E.Compromise as Precise JusticeCalifornia Law Review, 68 (1980): 250
Cooper, K.Assessing Possibilities in Damages Awards: The Loss of a Chance or the Chance of a LossSaskatchewan Law Review, 37 (1973): 193
Cour de Cassation. Annual Report (2007)
Dan-Cohen, M.Luck and IdentityTheoretical Inquiries in Law, 9 (2008): 1
Daniels, N. ‘Reflective Equilibrium’ in Zalta, E. (ed.) Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011)
Dannemann, G.Comparative Law: Study of Similarities or Differences’ in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Davies, P.Complicity’ in Dyson, M. (ed.) Unravelling Tort and Crime (Cambridge University Press, 2014)
Dawid, A.P.The Difficulty about ConjunctionThe Statistician, 36 (1987): 91
Dawid, A.P.The Role of Scientific and Statistical Evidence in Assessing Causality’ in Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)
Deffains, B. and Fluet, C.Legal Liability when Individuals have Moral ConcernsJournal of Law, Economics and Organization, 29 (2013): 930
Déjean de la Batie, N. ‘Note under Cass Civ 3e, 19 May 1976 (3 decisions)’ Semaine Juridique 1978.II.18773 (1978)
Delgado, R.Beyond Sindell: Relaxation of Cause-in-Fact Rules for Indeterminate Plaintiffs’, California Law Review, 70 (1982): 881
Demougin, D. and Fluet, C.Preponderance of EvidenceEuropean Economic Review, 50 (2006): 963
Department for Work and Pensions. ‘Asbestos-Related Diseases’ (London: Crown Copyright, 2005)
Descorps-Declère, F. ‘La Cohérence de la jurisprudence de la Cour de Cassation sur la perte de chance consécutive à la faute du médecin’ Dalloz, 2005.742
Deutsch, E. ‘Die dem Gesch?gten nachteilige Ad?anz: Zur einschr?enden Auslegung des ���830 I 2 BGB durch den BGB’ Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1981): 2731
Dewes, D. and Trebilcock, M.The Efficacy of the Tort System and its Alternatives: A Review of Empirical EvidenceOsgoode Hall Law Journal, 30 (1992): 57
Dowe, P.Absences, Possible Causation, and the Problem of Non-localityThe Monist, 92 (2009): 23
Durry, G. ‘Faute médicale et perte de chances de survie’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1972): 408
Durry, G. ‘Jurisprudence française en matière de droit civil’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1971): 377
Durry, G. ‘La faute du médecin diminuant les “chances de guérison” du malade’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1967): 181
Durry, G. ‘La faute du médecin diminuant les “chances de guérison” du malade’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1969): 797
Dworkin, G. ‘Note on Cass Civ 2e, 19 May 1976’ in Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil (1977): 129
Dworkin, G.Risk and Remoteness. Causation Worse ConfoundedThe Modern Law Review, 27 (1964): 344
Dworkin, R.M.Hart's Postscript and the Character of Political PhilosophyOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24 (2004): 1
Dworkin, R.M.Is Wealth a Value?’ The Journal of Legal Studies, 9 (1980): 191
Dworkin, R.M.Principle, Policy, Procedure’ in Dworkin, R.M. A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985)
Eberl-Borges, C.§830 BGB und die GefährdungshaftungArchiv für civilistische Praxis, 196 (1996): 491
Eberl-Borges, C. Commentary in J von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: §830 BGB (2008)
Edelman, J.The Meaning of Loss and Enrichment’ in Chambers, R., Mitchell, C., and Penner, J. Philosophical Foundations of Unjust Enrichment (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Edelman, J.Loss of a ChanceTorts Law Journal 21 (2013). 1
Eisenberg, M.A.Probability and Chance in Contract LawUCLA Law Review 45 (1998): 1005
Ellis, L.Note, Loss of Chance as Technique: Toeing the Line at Fifty PercentTexas Law Review, 72 (1993): 369
Engel, C.Preponderance of the Evidence Versus Intime ConvictionVermont Law Review, 33 (2008–9): 435
Enoch, D. and Fisher, T. “‘Sense and Sensitivity’: Epistemic and Instrumental Approaches to Statistical EvidenceStanford Law Review 67 (2015): 557
Enoch, D., Spectre, L., and Fisher, T.Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of KnowledgePhilosophy & Public Affairs, 40 (2012): 197
Esmein, P.Note under Cour d'Appel Riom, 5 February 1964Semaine Juridique 1964.II.13640
Evans, H.Lost Litigation and Later KnowledgeProfessional Negligence, 23 (2007): 204
Evans, H.The Scope of Sephton: Limitation Where You Don't Get what You OughtProfessional Negligence, 25 (2009): 15
Evatt, P.L.A Closer Look at Loss of Chance under Nebraska Medical LawNebraska Law Review, 76 (1997): 979
Faure, M.G. and Bruggeman, V.Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability’ in Tichy, L. (ed.) Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Carlova, 2007)
Faure, M.G.The Complementary Roles of Liability, Regulation and Insurance in Safety Management: Theory and PracticeJournal of Risk Research, 17 (2014): 689
Ferrante, M.Causation in Criminal ResponsibilityNew Criminal Law Review, 11 (2008): 470
Finkelstein, C.Is Risk a Harm?University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151 (2003): 963
Finnis, J.Allocating Risks and Suffering: Some Hidden TrapsCleveland State Law Review, 38 (1990): 193
Finn, M.Anmerkung zu BGH, Urt v.19.6.2012 – VI ZR 77/11’, Medizinrecht, 31 (2013): 367
Fischer, D.A. ‘Causation in Fact in Omission Cases’ Utah Law Review, (1992): 1335
Fischer, DA.Causation in Fact in Products. Liability Failure to Warn CasesJournal of Products & Toxic Liability, 17 (1995): 271
Fischer, DA.Insufficient CausesKentucky Law Journal, 94 (2005–6): 277
Fischer, DA.Products Liability – An Analysis of Market ShareVanderbilt Law Review, 34 (1981): 1623
Fischer, DA.Proportional Liability, Statistical Evidence, and the Probability ParadoxVanderbilt Law Review, 46 (1993): 1201
Fischer, DA.Successive Causes and the Enigma of Duplicated HarmTennessee Law Review, 66 (1998–9): 1127
Fischer, DA.Tort Recovery for Loss of a ChanceWake Forest Law Review, 36 (2001): 605
Fischer, J.M. ‘“Ought-Implies-Can” Causal Determinism and Moral ResponsibilityAnalysis, 63 (2003): 244
Fischer, J.M. and Ennis, R.H.Causation and LiabilityPhilosophy and Public Affairs, 15 (1986): 33
Fisher, T.Conviction without ConvictionMinnesota Law Review, 96 (2012): 833
Fleischer, H. ‘Schadensersatz für verlorene Chancen im Vertrags-und Deliktsrecht’ Juristenzeitung, (1999): 766
Fleming, J.Probabilistic Causation in Tort LawCanadian Bar Review, 68 (1989): 661
Fletcher, G.P.Fairness and Utility in Tort TheoryHarvard Law Review, 85 (1972): 537
Foerste, U. Commentary to §§286–287 ZPO in Musielak, H. (ed.) Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung 9th edition (Munich: Beck, 2009)
Foerste, U. Commentary on §§286–287 ZPO in Musielak, H. (ed.) Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung 10th edition (Munich: Beck, 2013)
Fossier, T. and Lévêque, F. ‘Le “presque vrai” et le “pas tout à fait faux”: probabilities et decision juridictionnelle’ JCP no. 14, doctr. 427 (2012)
Frankfurt, H.Alternative Possibilities and Moral ResponsibilityJournal of Philosophy, 23 (1969): 829
Frasca, R.Loss of Chance Rules and the Valuation of Loss of Chance DamagesJournal of Legal Economics, 15 (2008–9): 91
Fraser, J.D. and Howarth, D.R.More Concern for Cause’, Legal Studies, 4 (1984): 131
Fumerton, R. and Kress, K.Causation and the Law: Preemption, Lawful Sufficiency and Causal SufficiencyLaw and Contemporary Problems, 64 (2001): 83
Galand-Carval, S.Causation under French Law’ in Spier, J. (ed.) Unification of Tort Law: Causation (Hague: Kluwer, 2000)
Galand-Carval, S.Country Report for France’ in Oliphant, K. (ed.) Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage (Vienna: Springer, 2009)
Galia-Beauchesne, A. ‘Note under Cass Crim. 19 May 1978’ Dalloz, (1980): 3
Gardner, J.Corrective Justice, CorrectedDiritto & Questioni Pubbliche, 12 (2012): 9
Gardner, J.Law's Aim in Law's Empire’ in Hershovitz, Scott (ed.) Exploring Law's Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
Gardner, J.Obligations and Outcomes in the Law of Torts’ in Cane, P. and Gardner, J. (eds.) Relating to Responsibility: Essays for Tony Honoré (Oxford: Hart, 2001)
Gardner, J.Some Rule-of-Law Anxieties about Strict Liability in Private Law’ in Austin, L. and Klimchuk, D. (eds.) Private Law and the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2014)
Gardner, J.The Mark of ResponsibilityOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (2003): 157
Gardner, J.The Wrongdoing That Gets ResultsPhilosophical Perspectives: 18 (2004): 53
Gardner, J.Torts and Other WrongsFlorida State University Law Review, 39 (2011): 43
Gardner, J.What is Tort Law For? Part 1: The Place of Corrective JusticeLaw and Philosophy, 30 (2011): 1
Gardner, J.What is Tort Law For? Part 2: The Place of Distributive Justice’ in Oberdiek, J. (ed.) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 2014)
Gardner, J.Wrongs and FaultsThe Review of Metaphysics, 59 (2005): 95
Geiger, S. and Kruse, C. ‘House of Lords 3 May 2006, Barker v. Corus Neue Impulse für das Europäische Deliktsrecht vom House of Lords’ European Review of Private Law, (2008): 339
Geistfeld, M.Inadequate Product Warnings and CausationUniversity of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 30 (1996–7): 309
Geistfeld, M.Scientific Uncertainty and Causation in Tort LawVanderbilt Law Review, 54 (2001): 1011
Geistfeld, M.Social Value as a Policy-Based Limitation on the Ordinary Duty to Exercise Reasonable CareWake Forest law Review, 44 (2009): 899
Geistfeld, M.The Analytics of Duty: Medical Monitoring and Related Forms of Economic LossVanderbilt Law Review, 88 (2002): 1921
Geistfeld, M.The Doctrinal Unity of Alternative Liability and Market Share LiabilityUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155 (2006): 447
Gernhuber, J. ‘Haftung bei alternativer Kausalität’ Juristenzeitung (1961): 152
Giesen, I.The reversal of the burden of proof in the Principles of European Tort Law A comparison with Dutch tort law and civil procedure rulesUtrecht Law Review, 6 (2010): 22
Gifford, D.The Challenge to the Individual Causation Requirement in Mass Products TortsWashington & Lee Law Review, 62 (2005): 873
Gilead, I., Green, M. and Koch, B., ‘General Report: Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Report’ in Gilead, I., Green, M., and Koch, B. (eds.) Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013)
Gold, S.Causation in Toxic Torts: Burdens of Proof, Standards of Persuasion, and Statistical EvidenceYale Law Journal, 96 (1986–7): 376
Gold, S.C.Causation in Toxic Torts: Burdens of Proof, Standards of Persuasion, and Statistical EvidenceYale Law Journal, 96 (1986): 376
Gold, S.C.The More We Know, The Less Intelligent We Are? – How Genomic Information Should and Should Not, Change Toxic Tort DoctrineHarvard Environmental Law Review, 34 (2010): 369
Gold, S.C.The “Reshapement” of the False Negative Asymmetry Doctrine in Toxic Tort CausationWilliam Mitchell Law Review, 37 (2011): 1507
Goldberg, J.C.P.What Clients Are Owed: Cautionary Observations on Lawyers and Loss of a ChanceEmory Law Journal, 52 (2003): 1201
Goldberg, J.C.P and Zipursky, B.Rights and Responsibility’ in Nolan, D. and Robertson, A. Rights and Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012)
Goldberg, J.C.PTorts as WrongsTexas Law Review, 88 (2010): 917
Goldberg, J.C.PUnrealized TortsVirginia Law Review, 88 (2002): 1625
Goldberg, R.Using Scientific Evidence to Resolve Causation Problems in Product Liability: UK, US and French Perspectives’ in Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Goldstein, B. and Henifin, M.Reference Guide on Toxology’ in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 3rd edition (Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2011)
Graßhoff, G. and May, M.Causal Regularities’ in Spohn, W., Ledwig, M., and Esfeld, M. (eds.) in Current Issues in Causation (Paderborn, Mentis, 2001)
Grechenig, C. and Stremitzer, A.Der Einwand rechtmäßigen Alternativverhaltens – Rechtsvergleich, ökonomische Analyse und Implicationen für die ProportionalhaftungRabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law, 73 (2009): 336
Green, M.D.Pessimism About MilwardWake Forest Journal of Law and Policy, 3 (2005): 41
Green, M.D.Second Thoughts about Apportionment in Asbestos LitigationSouthwestern University Law Review, 37 (2008): 531
Green, M.D.The Future of Proportional Liability: The Lessons of Toxic Substances Causation’ in Madden, S. (ed.) Exploring Tort Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Green, M.D.The Intersection of Factual Causation and DamagesDe Paul Law Review, 55 (2006): 571
Green, M.D., Freedman, M., and Gordis, L.Reference Guide on Epidemiology’ in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 3rd edition (Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2011)
Green, M.D., Powers, W., and Sanders, J.The Insubstantiality of the ‘Substantial Factor’ Test for CausationMissouri Law Review, 73 (2008): 399
Green, S.The Risk Pricing Principle: a Pragmatic Approach to Causation and Apportionment of DamagesLaw, Probability and Risk, 4 (2005): 159
Grey, B.The Plague of Causation in National Childhood Vaccine Injury ActHarvard Journal of Legislation, 48 (2011): 343
Griffin, L.“Which one of you did it?” Criminal Liability for “Causing or Allowing” the Death of a ChildIndiana International & Comparative Law Review, 15 (2004–5): 89
Grodsky, J.Genomics and Toxic Torts: Dismantling the Risk-Injury DivideStanford Law Review, 59 (2007): 1671
Gunson, J.Turbulent Causal Waters: The High Court, Causation and Medical NegligenceTort Law Review, 9 (2000): 53
Haack, S.Proving Causation: The Holism of Warrant and the Atomism of DaubertJournal of Health and Biomedical Law, 4 (2009): 253
Haack, S.Risky Business: Statistical Proof of Individual Causation’ in Ferrer, J. (ed.) Causalidad y Atribución de Responsibilidad (Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2012)
Häger, J.Die Kausalität bei Massenschäden’ in Festschrift für Canaris (Munich: Beck, 2007)
Hajek, A. ‘Interpretations of Probability’ in Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011)
Hajek, A.Mises Redux’ – Redux: Fifteen Arguments Against Finite FrequentismErkenntnis, 45 (1996): 209
Halbersberg, Y. and Guttel, E. ‘Behavioural Economics and Tort Law’ in Zamir, E. and Teichman, D. The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law (Oxford University Press, 2014)
Hall, N.Two Concepts of Causation’ in Collins, J. et al. (eds.) Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004)
Halpérin, J.French Legal Doctrine’ in Jansen, N. (ed.) The Development and Making of Legal Doctrine (Cambridge University Press, 2010)
Hamer, D.Before the High Court - Mind the Evidential Gap: Causation and Proof in Amaca Pty Ltd v EllisSydney Law Review, 31 (2009): 465
Hamer, D.Chance would be a fine thing: Proof of Causation and Quantum in an Unpredictable WorldMelbourne University Law Review, 23 (1999): 24
Hamer, D.Probabilistic Standards of Proof: Their Complements and the Errors that Are Expected to Flow from ThemUniversity of New England Law Journal, 1 (2004): 71
Hamer, D.The Civil Standard of Proof Uncertainty: Probability, Belief and JusticeSydney Law Review, 16 (1994): 506
Hanau, P. ‘Anmerkung zum Urteil des BGH vom 11.6.1968 (VI ZR 116/67)’ Neue Juristische Wochenschrift,(1968): 2291
Handfield, T. and Wilson, A.Chance and Context’ in Wilson, A. (ed.) Chance and Temporal Asymmetry (Oxford University Press, 2014)
Handfield, T. and Pisciotta, T.Is Risk-Liability Theory Compatible with Negligence Law?Legal Theory, 11 (2005): 387
Harel, A. and Porat, A.Aggregating Probabilities Across Cases: Criminal Responsibility for Unspecified OffensesMinnesota Law Review, 94 (2009): 261
Harman, E.Harming as Causing Harm’ in Roberts, M. and Wasserman, D. (eds.) Harming Future Persons (Dordrecht: Springer, 2009)
Hausch, A. ‘Vom therapierenden zum dokumentierenden Arzt — Über die zunehmende haftungsrechtliche Bedeutung der ärztlichen Dokumentation’ VersR, (2006): 612
Heinemann, K. ‘Baustein anwaltlicher Berufshaftung: die Beweislast’ Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, (1990): 2345
Henckel, W. ‘Grenzen richterlicher Schadensschätzung’ JuS, (1975): 221
Hensler, D.R.Has the Fat Lady Sung? The Future of Mass Toxic TortsReview of Litigation, 26 (2007): 883
Hernán, M. and Jick, S.S.Hepatitis B vaccination and multiple sclerosis: the jury is still outPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 15 (2006): 653
Hill, A.B.The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58 (1965): 295
Hill, J., Reiter, J., and Zanutto, E.A Comparison of Experimental and Observational Data Analyses’ in Gelman, A. and Weng, X. (eds.) Applied Bayesian Modelling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives (New York: Wiley, 2004)
Hill, T.A Lost Chance for Compensation in the Tort of Negligence by the House of Lords’, Modern Law Review, 4 (1991): 511
Hocquet-Berg, S. 10052 ‘La perte d'une chance pour fixer la réparation à la mesure statistique du lien causal entre les fautes et le dommage’ Semaine Juridique 2010.II.878
Hocquet-Berg, S. ‘Note’ in Semaine Juridique 2007.II.
Hoefer, C. ‘Causal Determinism’ in Zalta, E. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2010)
Hoefer, C.The Third Way on Objective Probability: A Sceptic's Guide to Objective ProbabilityMind, 116 (2007): 549
Hoffmann, L.CausationLaw Quarterly Review, 121 (2005): 421
Hoffmann., L.Fairchild and After’ in Burrows, A., Johnston, D., and Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Judge and Jurist: Essays in Memory of Lord Rodger (Oxford University Press, 2013)
Hoffmann., L. ‘Common Sense and Causing Loss’ (Lecture to the Chancery Bar Association, 1999)
Hogan, T.B.Cook v. Lewis Re-examinedModern Law Review, 24 (1961): 331
Hogg, M.Developing Causal Doctrine’ in Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Hohfeld, W.N.Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial ReasoningYale Law Journal, 23 (1913–14): 15
Honoré, A.M.Necessary and Sufficient Conditions in Tort Law’ in Owen, D. (ed.) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 1995)
Honoré, A.M.Review: Legal Cause in the Law of Torts by Robert E. KeetonHarvard Law Review, 77 (1964): 495
Honoré, A.M.Responsibility and Luck: The Moral Basis of Strict Liability’, Law Quarterly Review, 104 (1988): 530
Honoré, A.M.The Morality of Tort Law – Questions and Answers’ in Owen, D. (ed.) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 1995)
Lord Hope of Craighead. ‘James McGhee – A Second Mrs. Donoghue?Cambridge Law Journal, 62 (2003): 587
Howarth, D.H.Three Forms of Responsibility: On the Relationship between Tort Law and The Welfare StateCambridge Law Journal, 60 (2001): 553
Howarth, D.H.Libel: Its Purpose and ReformModern Law Review, 74 (2011): 845
Huet, J. ‘Perte d'une Chance: du plus ou moins classique?’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1986): 117
Hylton, K. ‘Causation in Tort Law: A Reconsideration’ in Arlen, J. (ed.) Research Handbook on the Economics of Torts (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013)
Ibbetson, D.J.Harmonisation of the Law of Tort and Delictin Zimmermann, R. (ed.) Grundstrukturen des Europäischen Deliktsrechts (Baden: Nomos, 2003)
IIAC. ‘Laryngeal Cancer and Asbestos Exposure’ (Position Paper 22) (2008)
Illari, P. and Williamson, J.What is a Mechanism? Thinking About Mechanisms Across the SciencesEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2 (2012): 119
Jakubowitz, D.“Help I've Fallen and Can't Get Up!” New York's Application of the Substantial Factor TestSt John's Journal of Legal Commentary, 18 (2003–4): 593
Jansen, N. Entry on §249 and § 252 BGB in Schmoeckel, M., Rückert, J., and Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Historisch-kritischer Kommentar zum BGB Band II: Schuldrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. 1. Teilband: §§ 241–304. 2. Teilband: §§ 305–432 (Tübingen: Mohr, 2007)
Jansen, N.The Concept of Non-Contractual Obligations: Rethinking the Divisions of Tort, Unjustified Enrichment, and Contract LawJournal of European Tort Law, 1 (2010): 16
Jansen, N.The Idea of a Lost ChanceOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19 (1999): 271
Johnson, E.Criminal Liability for Loss of a ChanceIowa Law Review, 91 (2005): 59
Jourdain, P. ‘Comment traiter le dommage potentiel?’ Responsabilité Civile et Assurances n° 3, March 2010, dossier 11
Jourdain, P. ‘Sur la perte d'une chance’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1992): 109
Jourdain, P. ‘Un recul de la responsabilité “in solidum” des members d'un groupe de personnes dont l'un d'entre eux est l'auteur non identifié du dommage’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1988): 769
Jourdain, P. ‘Usage et abus de la notion de perte d'une chance’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1989): 85
Julia, G. ‘La réception juridique de l'incertitude médicale’ Medicine et Droit, (2009): 127
Jungk, A. ‘Grundsätze und manche Ausnahme: Beweislastfragen im Regressprozess’ Anwaltsblatt, (2013): 142
Kadner-Graziano, T. ‘Alles oder nichts oder anteilige Haftung bei Verursachungszweifeln? – Zur Haftung für perte d'une chance/loss of a chance-Entscheidungen des schweizerischen Bundesgerichts vom 13. Juni 2007, des belg. Hof van Cassatie vom 5. Juni 2008 u.a.’ Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrecht, (2011): 171
Kadner-Graziano, T.Loss of a Chance in European Private Law “All or Nothing” or Partial Liability in Cases of Uncertain CausationEuropean Review of Private Law, 6 (2008): 1009
Kahan, M.Causation and the Incentives to Take Care under the Negligence Rule’, Journal of Legal Studies, 18 (1989): 427
Kagan, S.Causation, Liability, and InternalismPhilosophy and Public Affairs, 15 (1986): 41
Karner, E.The Function of the Burden of Proof in Tort Law’ in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. (eds.) European Tort Law 2008 (Springer: Vienna, 2008)
Katz, L.Proximate Cause in Michael Moore's Act and CrimeUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 142 (1993–4): 1513
Katzenmeier, C.Beweismaßreduzierung und probabilistische ProportionalhaftungZeitschrift für Zivilprozessrecht, 117 (2004): 187
Katzenmeier, C. ‘Haftung für HIV-kontaminierte Blutprodukte’ Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, (2005): 3391
Katzenmeier, C.Verschärfung der Berufshaftung durch Beweisrecht – der grobe Behandlungsfehler’ in Humaniora: Medizin, Recht, Geschichte 2006, Part 4 (Berlin: Springer, 2006)
Kaye, D.H.The Error of Equal RatesLaw Probability and Risk, 1 (2002): 3
Kaye, DH.Statistical Significance and the Burden of PersuasionLaw and Contemporary Problems, 46 (1983): 13
Kaye, DH. ‘The Limits of the Preponderance of Evidence Standard: Justifiably Naked Statistics and Multiple Causation’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal, (1982): 487.
Kaye, DH. ‘The Paradox of the Gatecrasher and Other Stories’ Arizona State Law Journal, (1979): 101
Keating, G.C.The Heroic Enterprise of the Asbestos CasesSouthwestern University Law Review, 38 (2008): 623
Keeler, J.Increased Risk, causation and Speeding: Van den H’euvel v TuckerTorts Law Journal, 12 (2004): 1
Kegel, G.Der Individualanscheinsbeweis und die Verteilung der Beweislast nach überwiegender Wahrscheinlichkeit’ in Festgabe für Kronstein (Karlsruhe: C F Mueller, 1967)
Keren-Paz, T.Risks and Wrongs’ Account of Corrective Justice in Tort Law: Too Much or Too Little?Diritto e questioni publiche, 12 (2012): 75
Kerkorian, P.G.Negligent Spoliation of Evidence: Skirting the “Suit Within a Suit” Requirement of Legal Malpractice ActionsThe Hastings Law Journal, 41 (1989–90): 1077
Kessler, L.W.Alternative Liability in Litigation Malpractice ActionsSan Diego Law Review, 37 (2000): 401
Khoury, L.Causation and Risk in the Highest Courts of Canada, England and FranceLaw Quarterly Review, 124 (2008): 103
King, J.H.Causation, Valuation and Chance in Personal Injury Torts Involving Preexisting Conditions and Future ConsequencesYale Law Journal, 90 (1981): 1353
King, J.H.“Reduction of Likelihood” Reformulation and Other Retrofitting of the Loss-of-a-Chance DoctrineUniversity of Memphis Law Review, 28 (1997–8): 491
Klein, A.A Model for Enhanced Risk Recovery in Tort’, Washington & Lee Law Review, 56 (1999): 1173
Klein, A.Beyond DES: Rejecting the Application of Market Share Liability in Blood Products LitigationTulane Law Review, 66 (1993–4): 883
Klein, A.Causation and Uncertainty: Making Connections in a Time of ChangeJurimetrics Journal, 49 (2008): 5
Klein, A.Fear of Disease and the Puzzle of Future Cases in TortUniversity of California, Davis Law Review, 35 (2001–2): 965
Klein, A.Rethinking Medical MonitoringBrooklyn Law Review, 64 (1998): 1
Kleinschmidt, J.Kausalität’ in Handwörterbuch des europäischen Privatrechts (Tübingen: Mohr, 2009)
Kletecka, A. ‘Alternative Verursachungskonkurrenz mit dem Zufall – Die Wahrscheinlichkeit als Haftungsgrund?’ Juristische Blätter, (2009): 137
Klöhn, L.Wertende Kausalität im Spiegel von Rechtsvergleichung, Rechtsdogmatik und RechtsökonomikZeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft, 105 (2006): 455
Koehler, J.When do Courts Think Base Rae Statistics are Relevant?Jurimetrics Journal, 42 (2002): 373
Koehler, J. (with Meixner, J.) ‘Decision Making and the Law: Truth Barriers’ (on SSRN) (2013)
Koziol, H.Schadenersatz für den Verlust einer Chance?’ in Festschrift für Hans Stoll zum 75. Geburtstag (Tübingen: Mohr, 2001)
Kraus, J.A Non-Solution to a Non-Problem: A Comment on Alan Strudler's “Mass Torts and Moral PrinciplesLaw & Philosophy, 16 (1997): 91
Kriebel, D.How Much Evidence is Enough? Conventions of Causal InferenceLaw and Contemporary Problems, 72 (2009): 121
Knutsen, E.S.Ambiguous Cause-in-Fact and Structured Causation: A Multi-Jurisdictional ApproachTexas International Law Journal, 38 (2003): 249
Kortmann, J.S.Ab alio ictu(s): Misconceptions about Julian's View on CausationJournal of Legal History, 20 (1999): 95
Laleng, P. ‘Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd. and Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council: A Material Contribution to UncertaintyModern Law Review, 74 (2012): 777
Laudan, L.Strange Bedfellows: Inference to the Best Explanation and the Criminal Standard of ProofThe International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 11 (2007): 292
Lee, J.Fidelity in Interpretation: Lord Hoffmann and the Adventure of the Empty HouseLegal Studies, 28 (2008): 1Leipold, D. Commentary to §§286–287 ZPO in Stein, F. & Jonas, M. Kommentar zur Zivilprozeßordnung Band 3 §§253–299a 22nd edition (Tübingen, 2008)
Leshem, S. and Miller, G.All-or-Nothing versus Proportionate DamagesJournal of Legal Studies, 38 (2009): 345
LeSourd, N. ‘La Perte d'une Chance’ Gazette du Palais 1963 2.doct.49
Levmore, S.Probabilistic Recoveries, Restitution, and Recurring WrongsJournal of Legal Studies, 19 (1990): 691
Lewis, D.CausationJournal of Philosophy, 70 (1973): 556
Lin, A.C.Beyond Tort: Compensating Victims of Environmental Toxic InjurySouth California Law Review, 78 (2004–5): 1439
List, C. and Pivato, M. ‘Emergent Chance’ (ms on file with the author, 2014)
Lord, P.A.Loss of Chance in Legal MalpracticeWashington Law Review, 61 (1986): 1479
Lunney, M.Chances of Recovery in TortKing's College Law Journal, 7 (1996)
Lunney, M.What Price a Chance?Legal Studies, 15 (1995): 1
Luntz, H. ‘A View from Abroad’ New Zealand Law Review, (2008): 92
Luntz, H. ‘Loss of a Chance in Medical Negligence’ University of Melbourne Law Research Series, (2010): 14
Luntz, H.Loss of Chance’ in Freckelton, and Mendelson, (eds.) Causation in Law and Medicine (Surrey: Ashgate, 2002)
Madden, M.S. and Holian, J.Defendant Indeterminacy: New Wine into Old SkinsLouisiana Law Review, 67 (2006–7): 785
Magnus, U.Why is US Tort Law so Different?Journal of European Tort Law, 1 (2010): 102
Mahaffey, G.S.Cause-In-Fact and the Plaintiff's Burden of Proof with Regard to Causation and Damages in Transactional Legal Malpractice Matters: The Necessity of Demonstrating the Better DealSuffolk University Law Review, 37 (2004): 393
Malone, W.Ruminations on Cause-in-Fact’, Stanford Law Review, 9 (1956): 60
Mansfield, J.H.Hart and Honoré, Causation in the Law-A CommentVanderbilt Law Review, 17 (1963–4): 487
Markovits, R. ‘On the Economic Inefficiency of a Libera-Corrective-Justice Securing Law of Torts’ 2006 Illinois Law Review, (2006): 525
Mäsch, G.Der Fußballtrainer und die Anwaltshaftung, oder: Meine objektive MeinungAnwaltsblatt, 12 (2009): 855
Mäsch, G. ‘Gregg v Scott: Much Ado about Nothing? Entscheidung des House of Lords vom 27. Januar 2005 mit Anmerkung von Gerald Mäsch’ Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrecht (2006)
Matthies, K. ‘Anmerkung zu BGH, Urt. v. 21.9. 1982, Az. VI ZR 302/80’ Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, (1983): 335
Mautner, M.Luck in the CourtsTheoretical Inquiries in Law, 9 (2008): 217
Mayer, D. ‘La ‘Garde’ en Commun’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1975): 197
Mazeaud, H. & Mazeaud, L. ‘Impossibilité d'identifier parmi les members d'un groupe l'auteur de la faute dommageable’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1942): 60
Mazeaud, H. & Mazeaud, L. ‘Impossibilité de determiner, parmi des fautes simultanément commises par plusiers personnes, celle qui a cause le dommage’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1950): 60
Mazeaud, H. & Mazeaud, L. ‘Tir simultané par plusiers chasseurs; blessure par plusiers projectiles; garde collective des armes’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1960): 479
McBride, N.J.Duties of Care: Do They Really Exist?Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24 (2004): 417
McBride, N.Rights and the Basis of Tort Law’ in Nolan, D. and Robertson, A. (eds). Rights and Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
McBride, N. ‘Duties of Care in Negligence’ (unpublished, 2011)
McBride, N.Tort Law and Human Flourishing’ in Pitel, S.A., Neyers, J., and Chamberlain, E. Challenging Orthodoxy in Tort Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)
McBride, N. and Steel, S.Suing for the Loss of the Right to Sue: Why Wright is WrongProfessional Negligence, 28 (2012): 27
McCarthy, D.Liability and RiskPhilosophy and Public Affairs, 25 (1996): 238
McIvor, C.The Use of Epidemiological Evidence in UK Tort Law’ in Loue, S. (ed.) Forensic Epidemiology in the Global Context (New York: Springer, 2013)
McGovern, F.E.The Tragedy of the Asbestos CommonsVanderbilt Law Review, 88 (2002): 1721
McGregor, H.Loss of Chance: Where Has it Come from and Where Is it Going?Professional Negligence, 24 (2008): 2
McInnes, M.Causation in Tort Law: A Decade in the Supreme Court of CanadaSaskatchewan Law Review, 63 (2000): 445
McLachlin, B.Negligence Law – Proving the Connection’ in Mullany, and Linden, (eds.) Torts Tomorrow: A Tribute to John Fleming (London: LBC, 1998)
McLaughlin, G.A.Proximate CauseHarvard Law Review, 39 (1925–6): 149
Miller, C.Causation in Personal Injury after (and before) SienkiewiczLegal Studies 32 (2012): 396
Miller, C.Causation in Personal Injury: Legal or Epidemiological Common SenseLegal Studies, 26 (2006): 533
Miller, C.Gregg v. Scott: Loss of Chance RevisitedLaw, Probability and Risk 4 (2005): 227
Miller, C.Liability for Negligently Increased Risk: The Repercussions of Barker v Corus UK (plc)Law Probability and Risk, 8 (2009): 39
Miller, C.Loss of Chance in Personal Injury: A Review of Recent DevelopmentsLaw Probability and Risk, 5 (2006): 63
Miller, C.NESS for Beginners’ in Goldberg, R. (ed). Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Mislawski, R. ‘La Causalité Dans La Responsibilité Civile’ (Unpublished Thesis, 2006)
Mislawski, R.Vaccin contre l'hépatite B et sclérose en plaques; retour sur la causalitéMedicine & Droit, 102 (2010): 105
Mitchell, P.Loss of a Chance in DeceitLaw Quarterly Review, 125 (2009): 12
Moreteau, O.Case Report on France’ in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. (eds.) European Tort Law 2005 (Vienna: Springer, 2005)
Morgan, J.Lost Causes in the House of LordsModern Law Review, 66 (2003): 277
Morgan, J.Causation, Politics and Law: The English - and Scottish - Asbestos Saga’ in Goldberg, R. (ed). Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Mullany, N.J.Common Sense Causation—An Australian ViewOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 12 (1992): 431
Nace, A.B.Market Share Liability: A Current Assessment of a Decade Old DoctrineVanderbilt Law Review, 44 (1991): 395
Nance, D.A Comment on the Supposed Paradoxes of a Mathematical Interpretation of the Logic of TrialsBoston University Law Review, 66 (1986): 947
Nance, D.Civility and the Burden of ProofHarvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 17 (1994): 647
Neuberger, Lord.Loss of Chance and Causation’, Professional Negligence, 24 (2008): 206
Nichols, S.Jorgenson v Vener: The South Dakota Supreme Court Declares Loss-of-Chance Doctrine as Part of Our Common Law in Medical Malpractice TortsSouth Dakota Law Review, 46 (2001): 618
Noah, L.An Inventory of Mathematical Blunders in Applying the Loss-of-a-Chance Doctrine’, Review of Litigation, 24 (2006): 369
Nolan, D.Causation and the Goals of Tort Law’ in Robertson, A. and Wu, Tang Hang (eds.) The Goals of Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009)
Note. ‘Latent Harms and Risk-Based Damages’ Harvard Law Review, 111 (1997–8): 1505
Note. Harvard Law Review, 122 (2009): 1247
Note. Harvard Law Review, 123 (2010): 1771
Oberdiek, J.Philosophical Issues in Tort LawPhilosophy Compass, 3 (2008): 734
Oberdiek, J.The Moral Significance of RiskingLegal Theory, 18 (2011): 339
Oberdiek, J.Towards a Right Against RiskingLaw and Philosophy, 28 (2009): 367
Oetker, H. Commentary to §249 BGB in Münchener Kommentar zum BGB: Band 2: Schuldrecht, Allgemeiner Teil (§241–432) 6th edition (2012)
Oetker, H. 5th edition (2007)
Offerman, J.“The Dose Makes the Poison”: Specific Causation is Texas Asbestos Cases after Borg-WarnerTexas Tech Law Review, 41 (2009): 709
Oliphant, K.Alternative Causation: A Comparative Analysis of Austrian and English Law’ in Festschrift für Helmut Koziol (Vienna: Jan Sramek Verlag, 2010)
Oliphant, K.Proportional Liability’ in Verschraegen, B. (ed.) Interdisciplinary Studies of Comparative and Private International Law (Vol. 1) (Vienna: Jan Sramek Verlag, 2010, 179)
O'Mealley, Hon J.L. ‘Asbestos Litigation in New South Wales’ Journal of Law and Policy, (2007): 1209
Orloff, N. and Stedinger, J.A Framework for Evaluating the Preponderance-of-the-Evidence StandardUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 131 (1983): 1159
Otsuka, M. (unpublished). ‘The Fairness of Equal Chances’ (on file with the author)
Overvold, M.Self-interest and the Concept of Self-SacrificeCanadian Journal of Philosophy, 10 (1980): 105
Pardo, M.S.Second Order Proof RulesFlorida Law Review, 61 (2009): 1083
Pardo, M.S. and Allen, R.Juridical Proof and the Best ExplanationLaw and Philosophy, 27 (2008): 223
Paul, L.A.Keeping Track of the Time: Emending the Counterfactual Analysis of CausationAnalysis, 58 (1998): 191
Peel, W.E.Loss of a Chance in Medical NegligenceLaw Quarterly Review, 121 2005: 364
Peel, W.E. ‘Lost Chances and Proportionate Recovery’ Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, (2006): 289
Penneau, J.L. ‘Note under Cass Civ 1e, 27 March 1973’ Dalloz 1973.895
Penneau, J.L. ‘Note under Cass Civ 1e, 17 November 1982’ Dalloz, (1982) Info Rapides 380
Perry, S.H.Protected Interests and Undertakings in the Law of NegligenceUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 42 (1992): 247
Perry, S.Risk, Harm and Responsibility’ in Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law Owen, D. (ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995)
Perry, S.Risk, Harm, Interests, and Rights’, in Risk: Philosophical Perspectives Lewens, T. (ed.) (London: Routledge, 2007, 190)
Perry, S.The Moral Foundations of Tort LawIowa Law Review, 77 (1992): 449
Phegan, C.The Limits of Compensation: An Australian Perspective on Public Policy, Causation, and MitigationInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly, 34 (1985): 470
Pizzirusso, J.Increased Risk, Fear of Disease, and Medical Monitoring: Are Novel Damage Claims Enough to Overcome Causation Difficulties in Toxic TortsThe Environmental Lawyer, 7 (2000–1): 183
Poisson-Drocourt, E. ‘Note under Cass Civ 2e 15 December 1980’ Dalloz, (1981): 455
Poole, J. ‘Loss of Chance and the Evaluation of Hypotheticals in Contract Claims’ Lloyds Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, (2007): 63
Porat, A.Misalignments in Tort LawYale Law Journal, 121 (2011): 82
Porat, A. and Posner, E.Aggregation and LawYale Law Journal, 122 (2012): 2
Porat, A. and Stein, A.Indeterminate Causation and Apportionment of Damages: An Essay on Holtby, Allen and FairchildOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (2003): 667
Porat, A. and Stein, A.Liability for Future Harm’ in Goldberg, R. (ed). Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Porat, A. and Stein, A.Liability for Uncertainty: Making Evidential Damage ActionableCardozo Law Review, 18 (1996–7): 1891
Posner, E.Probability Errors: Some Positive and Normative Implications for Tort and Contract LawSupreme Court Economic Review, 11 (2003): 125
Posner, R.A.A Theory of NegligenceJournal of Legal Studies, 1 (1972): 29
Posner, R.A.The Concept of Corrective Justice In Recent Theories of Tort LawJournal of Legal Studies, 10 (1981): 187
Posner, R.A.Wealth Maximization and Tort Law: A Philosophical Inquiry’ in Owens, D. (ed.) Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)
Postacioglu, I.E. ‘Les faits simultanés et le problème de la responabilité’ Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1954): 438
Pryor, E.S.After the JudgmentVanderbilt Law Review, 88 (2002): 1757
Pryor, R.Lost Profit or Lost Chance Reconsidering the Measure of Recovery for Lost Profits in Breach of Contract ActionsRegent University Law Review, 19 (2007): 561
Prütting, H. Commentary on §286, §287 ZPO in Münchener Kommentar zum Zivilprozessordnung 3rd edition (Munich: Beck, 2008)
Prütting, H. Commentary on §§286 – 287 ZPO, 4th edition (2013)
Psillos, S.Causal Explanation and Manipulation’ in Persson, J., and Ylikoski, P. (eds.) Rethinking Explanation (New York: Springer, 2007)
Psillos, S.Regularity Theories’ in Menzies, P. and Hitchcock, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Causation (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Pundik, A.Epistemology and the Law of Evidence: Four Doubts about Alex Stein's Foundations of Evidence LawCivil Justice Quarterly, 25 (2006): 504
Pundik, A.Statistical Evidence and Individual LitigantsInternational Journal of Evidence and Proof, 12 (2008a): 303
Pundik, A.The Epistemology of Statistical EvidenceEvidence & Proof, 15 (2011): 117
Pundik, A.What is Wrong with Statistical Evidence? Attempts to Establish an Epistemic DeficiencyCivil Justice Quarterly, 27 (2008b): 461
Puppe, I. Commentary on §13 StGB in Kindhäuser, U., Neumann, U., and Paeffgen, H. (eds.) Strafgesetzbuch 3rd edition (Baden: Nomos, 2010)
Puppe, I.Zurechnung und Wahrscheinlichkeit – Zur Analyse des RiskoerhöhungsprinzipsZeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 95 (1983): 287
Quézel-Ambrunaz, C. ‘La fiction de la causalité alternative’ Dalloz 2010.1162(2010)
Quézel-Ambrunaz, C. ‘Note under Cass Civ 1e, 11 Mars 2010’ 2010 Gazette du Palais II.833 (2010)
Rabin, M.Psychology and EconomicsJournal of Economic Literature, 36 (1998): 11
Rabin, R.L.Enabling TortsDePaul Law Review, 49 (1999–2000): 345
Rabin, R.L.Harms from Exposure to Toxic Substances: The Limits of Liability LawPepperdine Law Review, 38 (2010–11): 419
Rabin, R.L.Indeterminate Future Harm in the Context of September 11Vanderbilt Law Review, 88 (2002): 1831
Rabin, R.L.Some Thoughts on the Efficacy of a Mass Toxics Administrative Compensation SchemeMaryland Law Review, 52 (1993): 951
Raschel, L. ‘La delicate disintinction de la perte de chance et du risque de dommage’, Semaine Juridique G.No.15, 763, note under Cass Civ 1e, 14 Jan 2010, no.08–16.760 (2010)
Redmayne, M.Exploring the Proof ParadoxesLegal Theory, 14 (2008): 281
Redmayne, M.Objective Probability and the Assessment of EvidenceLaw, Probability and Risk, 2 (2003): 275
Redmayne, M.Standards of Proof in Civil LitigationModern Law Review, 62 (1999): 167
Reece, H.Losses of Chances in the LawModern Law Review, 59 (1996): 188
Reid, G.Gregg v Scott and Lost ChancesProfessional Negligence, 21 (2005): 78
Rescher, N.Leibniz, Keynes, and the Rabbis on a Problem of Distributive JusticeJournal of Philosophy, 86 (1989): 337
Rhee, R.Application of Finance Theory to Increased Risk Harms’, Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 23 (2004): 111
Rhee, R.Probability, Policy and the Problem of Reference ClassInternational Journal of Evidence and Proof, 11 (2007): 286
Ripert, G. ‘Note under Cour d'Orléans (17 January 1949)’ Dalloz 1949 Jurisprudence, (1949). 502
Ripstein, A.Mischief and MisfortuneMcGill Law Journal, 41 (1995): 91
Ripstein, A.As If It Had Never HappenedWilliam and Mary Law Review, 48 (2007): 1957
Ripstein, A.Closing the gap’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 9 (2008): 61
Ripstein, A.Justice and ResponsibilityCanadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 17 (2004): 361
Ripstein, A.Private Law and Private NarrativesOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20 (2000): 683
Ripstein, A.Tort Law in a Liberal StateJournal of Tort Law, 1 (2007): 1
Ripstein, A. and Zipursky, B.Corrective Justice in an Age of Mass Torts’ in Postema, , (ed.) Philosophy and the Law of Torts, (Cambridge University Press, 2001)
Riss, O. ‘Hypothetische Kausalität, objective Berchnung bloßer Vermögensschäden und Ersatz verlorner Prozesschancen’ Juristische Blätter, (2004): 440
Robertson, A.Justice, Community Welfare and the Duty of CareLaw Quarterly Review, 127 (2011): 370
Robertson, D.W. ‘Causation in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Three Arguable MistakesWake Forest Law Review, 44 (2009): 1007
Robertson, D.W.The Common Sense of Cause-in-FactTexas Law Review, 75 (1997): 1765
Robinson, G.Multiple Causation in Tort Law: Reflections on the DES CasesVirginia Law Review, 68 (1982): 713
Robinson, G.Probabilistic Causation and Compensation for Tortious RiskJournal of Legal Studies, 14 (1985): 779
Rosenberg, D.Decoupling Deterrence and Compensation Functions in Mass Tort Class Actions for Future LossVanderbilt Law Review, 88 (2002): 1871
Rosenberg, D.Individual Justice and Collectivizing Risk-Based Claims in Mass Exposure CasesNew York University Law Review, 71 (1997): 210
Rosenberg, D.Mass Torts and Class Actions: What Defendants Have and Plaintiffs Don'tHarvard Journal on Legislation, 37 (2000): 393
Rosenberg, D.The Causal Connection in Mass Exposure Cases: A Public Law Vision of the Tort SystemHarvard Law Review, 97 (1985): 851
Rostron, A.Beyond Market Share Liability: A Theory of Proportionate Share Liability for Non-Fungible Products’, University of California Los Angeles Law Review, 52 (2004): 151
Rotherham, C.Gain-Based Relief in Tort after Attorney General v BlakeLaw Quarterly Review, 126 (2011): 102
Rothman, K. and Greenland, S.Causation and Causal Inference in EpidemiologyAmerican Journal of Public Health, 95 (2005): 144
Rue, J.D.Returning to the Roots of the Bramble Bush: The ‘But-For Test Regains Primacy in Causal Analysis in the American Law Institute's Proposed Restatement (Third) of TortsFordham Law Review, 71 (2002–3): 2679
Saluden, M. ‘Commentary on Cass Civ 1e 17 November 1982Semaine Juridique II 20056
Sanchiricho, C.Evidence TamperingDuke Law Journal, 53 (2004): 1215
Sanders, J.Risky Business: Causation in Asbestos Cases (and beyond?)’ in Goldberg, R. (ed). Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Sanders, J., Green, M., and Powers, W.The Insubstantiality of the “Substantial Factor” Test for CausationMissouri Law Review, 73 (2008): 399
Sargos, P. ‘Faute et perte de chance dans l'organisation du diagnostic et l'organisation d'une clinique’ Semaine Juridique 2009.II.10030 (2009)
Sargos, P. ‘La causalité en matière de responsabilité ou le “droit Schtroumpf’ 2008 Dalloz (2008): 1935
Sartorio, C.How to be Responsible for Something Without Causing itPhilosophical Perspectives, 18 (2004): 315
Sartorio, C.Moral InertiaPhilosophical Studies, 140 (2008): 117
Savatier, R. ‘Commentary on decision of 14 December 1965, Cour de Cassation’ Semaine Juridique 1966.G.II.14753 (1966)
Savatier, R. ‘Commentary on decision of 1 June 1976, Cour de Cassation’ Semaine Juridique 1976.G.II.18483 (1976)
Savatier, R. ‘Commentary on decision of 2 May 1978, Cour de Cassation’ Semaine Juridique 1978.II.18966 (1978)
Savatier, R. ‘Une faute peut-elle engendrer la responsabilité d'un damage sans l'avoir cause?’ Dalloz 1970.chron.123 (1970)
Schaffer, J.Contrastive Causation in the LawLegal Theory, 16 (2010): 259
Schaffer, J.Counterfactuals, Causal Independence and Conceptual CircularityAnalysis, 64 (2004): 299
Schaffer, J.Deterministic ChanceBritish Journal Philosophy of Science, 58 (2007): 113
Scheines, R.Causation, Statistics, and the LawJournal of Law and Policy, 16 (2007–8): 135
Scheines, R.Causation, Truth, and the LawBrooklyn Law Review, 73 (2009): 959
Scherpe, J.A New Gist?Cambridge Law Journal, 65 (2006): 487
Scherpe, J. ‘Ausnahmen vom Erfordernis eines strikten Kausalitätsnachweises im englischen Deliktsrecht’ Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, (2004): 164
Scheuerman, S.Against Liability for Private Risk ExposureHarvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 35 (2012): 681
Schiemann, G. Entry in J von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: Buch 2: Recht der Schuldverhältnisse §249–254 (Schadensersatzrecht) (2005)
Schiemann, G.Kausalitätsprobleme bei der Arzthaftung’ in Festschrift für Canaris (Tubingen, 2007)
Schmelk, R. ‘Note under Cass Civ 2e, 11 February 1966’ Dalloz 1966.229 (1966)
Schmueli, B. and Sinai, Y. ‘Liability under Uncertain Causation? Four Talmudic Answers to a Contemporary Tort Dilemma’ Boston University International Law Journal (forthcoming)
Schroeder, C.Corrective Justice and Liability for Increasing RisksUniversity of California Los Angeles, 37 (1990): 439
Schubert, C. Commentary on §249 BGB in Bamberger/Roth-Schubert, Beck’ scher Online-Kommentar (2012)
Schwartz, G.Mixed Theories of Tort Law: Affirming both Deterrence and Corrective Justice’, Texas Law Review, 75 (1996–7): 1801
Seavey, W.Tabula in NaufragioHarvard Law Review, 63 (1949–50): 643
Shavell, S.An Analysis of Causation and the Scope of Liability in the Law of TortsJournal of Legal Studies, 9 (1980): 463
Shavell, S.Causation and Tort Liability’ in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law (New York: Stockton Press, 1998)
Shavell, S. ‘Economic Analysis of Accident Law’ (2003) (Working Paper on National Bureau of Economics Website,
Shavell, S. ‘Liability for Accidents’ in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online (2008)
Shavell, S.Liability for Accidents’ in Shavell, S. and Polinsky, A.M. (eds.) Handbook of Law and Economics (Oxford: Elsevier, 2007)
Shavell, S.Uncertainty over Causation and the Determination of Civil LiabilityThe Journal of Law and Economics, 28 (1985): 587
Sheiner, N.DES and a Proposed Theory of Enterprise LiabilityFordham Law Review, 46 (1997): 1007
Simmonds, N.E.Epstein's Theory of Strict Tort LiabilityCambridge Law Journal, 51 (1992): 113
Sirks, B.The Delictual Origin, Penal Nature and Reipersecutory Object of the Action Damni Iniuriae Legis AquiliaeTijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 77 (2009): 303
Slim, H. ‘Les intérêts protégés par la responsabilité civile’: available at, 2009 (accessed 1 June 2015)
Smith, Janet. ‘Causation in Tort: The Search for Principle’ Munkman Lecture (2009)
Smith, J.Legal Cause in Actions of TortHarvard Law Review 25 (1911–12): 103
Smith, M. and Jackson, F.Absolutist Moral Theories and UncertaintyJournal of Philosophy, 103 (2006): 267
Smith, S.The Normativity of Private LawOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 31 (2011): 215
Solum, L.Presumptions and Transcendentalism: You Prove It! Why Should I?Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 17 (1994): 691
Solum, L.Procedural JusticeSouthern California Law Review, 78 (2004): 181
Solum, L. ‘Uncertainty, Risk and Ignorance’ (2011) at Legal Theory Lexicon: 070 at
Solum, L. and Marzen, S.Truth and Uncertainty: Legal Control of the Destruction of EvidenceEmory Law Journal, 36 (1987): 1085
Souplet, I. ‘La Perte De Chances Dans La Droit De La Responsabilite Medical’ (Unpublished Thesis, 2002)
Spector, H.The MMTS Analysis of Causation’ in Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Spellman, B.A. and Kincannon, A.The Relation Between Counterfactual (‘But For’) and Causal ReasoningLaw and Contemporary Problems, 64 (2001): 241
Spickhoff, A. ‘Grober Behandlungsfehler und Beweislastumkehr’ Neue juristische Wochenschrift, (2004): 2345
Spindler, G.Kausalität im Zivil-und WirtschaftsrechtArchiv für civilistische Praxis, 208 (2008): 283
Spindler, G. ‘Commentary on §830 I 2 BGB’ in Bamberger, and Roth, (eds). Beck'scher Online-Kommentar BGB (2013)
Stapleton, J.Benefits of Comparative Tort Reasoning: Lost in TranslationJournal of Tort Law, 1 (2007): 1— ‘Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences’ Law Quarterly Review, 119 (2003): 388
Stapleton, J.Choosing What We Mean by “Causation” in the LawMissouri Law Review, 73 (2008): 433
Stapleton, J.Duty of Care and Economic Loss: A Wider AgendaLaw Quarterly Review, 107 (1991): 389
Stapleton, J.Evaluating Goldberg and Zipursky's Civil Recourse TheoryFordham Law Review, 75 (2006): 1529
Stapleton, J.Factual CausationFederal Law Review, 38 (2010): 467
Stapleton, J.Factual Causation and Asbestos CancersLaw Quarterly Review, 126 (2010): 351
Stapleton, J.Factual Causation, Mesothelioma and Statistical ValidityLaw Quarterly Review, 128 (2012): 221
Stapleton, J.Legal Cause, Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for ConsequencesVanderbilt Law Review, 54 (2001): 941
Stapleton, J.Lords a'Leaping Evidentiary GapsTorts Law Journal, 10 (2002): 1
Stapleton, J.Loss of the Chance of Cure from CancerModern Law Review, 68 (2005): 996
Stapleton, J.Occam's Razor Reveals an Orthodox Basis for Chester v AfsharLaw Quarterly Review, 122 (2006): 426
Stapleton, J.Review of Porat and Stein, Tort Law under UncertaintyModern Law Review, 66 (2003): 308
Stapleton, J.The Gist of Negligence: Part 2 the Relationship between “Damage” and CausationLaw Quarterly Review, 104 (1988): 389
Stapleton, J.The Two Explosive Proof-of-Causation Doctrines Central to Asbestos ClaimsBrooklyn Law Review, 74 (2009): 1011
Stapleton, J.Two Causal Fictions at the Heart of US Asbestos DoctrineLaw Quarterly Review, 122 (2006): 189
Stapleton, J.Unnecessary CausesLaw Quarterly Review, 129 (2013): 39
Stapleton, J. ‘An ‘Extended But-for Test’ for the Causal Relation in the Law of Obligations’,Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, (2015): forthcoming
Stauch, M.Causation, Risk and Loss of Chance in Medical NegligenceOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 17 (1996): 205
Stauch, M. ‘“Material Contribution” as a Response to Causal Uncertainty: Time for a RethinkCambridge Law Journal, 68 (2009): 27
Stein, A.The Refoundation of Evidence LawCanadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 9 (1996): 279
Stein, A.Towards a Theory of Medical MalpracticeIowa Law Review, 97 (2012): 1201
Steel, S. and Ibbetson, D.J.More Grief Over Uncertain Causation in TortCambridge Law Journal, 70 (2011): 451
Steel, S.Causation in English Tort Law: Still Wrong After All These YearsUniversity of Queensland Law Journal, 31 (2012): 243
Steel, S.Causation in Tort and Crime: Unity or Divergence?’ in Dyson, M.N. Unravelling Tort and Crime (Cambridge University Press, 2014)
Steel, S.Defining Causal Counterfactuals in NegligenceLaw Quarterly Review, 130 (2014): 564
Steel, S.False Imprisonment and the Fetch of Hypothetical WarrantLaw Quarterly Review, 127 (2011): 527
Steel, S. ‘Justifying Exceptions to Proof of Causation in Tort’ Modern Law Review, Forthcoming
Steel, S.On when Fairchild AppliesLaw Quarterly Review, 131 (2015): 363
Steel, S.Rationalising Loss of a Chance in Tort’ in Pitel, S.A., Neyers, J., and Chamberlain, E. Challenging Orthodoxy in Tort Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)
Steel, S.Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd and Exceptional Doctrines of Natural CausationJournal of European Tort Law, 2 (2011): 294
Steel, S.Suing for the Loss of the Right to Sue: Why Wright is WrongProfessional Negligence, 28 (2012): 27
Steel, S.Uncertainty over Causal Uncertainty (Karen Sienkiewicz (Administratrix of the Estate of Enid Costello) v Greif (UK) Ltd)Modern Law Review, 73 (2010): 646
Steffey, D.L., Fienberg, S.E., and Sturgess, R.H.Statistical Assessment of Damages in Breach of Contract LitigationJurimetrics, 46 (2005–6): 129
Steiner, T. ‘Der grobe ärztliche Behandlungsfehler in der Praxis’ Versicherungsrecht, (2009): 474
Stevens, R.Rights and Other Things’ in Robertson, A. and Nolan, D. (eds.) Rights in Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Stiggelbout, M.The Case of Losses in Any EventLegal Studies, 30 (2010): 558
Stoffel-Munck, P. ‘Confirmation de la définition de la perte de chance’ Semaine Juridique 2007.I.185
Stoffel-Munck, P. Note in Dalloz 2009.2817
Stoll, H.Die Beweislastverteilung bei positiven Vertragsverletzungen’ in Festschrift für Hippel (Tubingen: Mohr, 1967)
Stoll, H.Haftungsverlagerung durch beweisrechtliche MittelArchiv für civilistische Praxis, 176 (1976): 145
Stoll, H. ‘Schadensersatz für verlorene Heilungschancen vor englischen Gerichten in rechtsvergleichender Sicht’ in Festschrift für Hippel (1995)
Stone, J.Burden of Proof and the Judicial ProcessLaw Quarterly Review, 60 (1944): 262
Strachan, D.M.A.Variations on an EnigmaModern Law Review, 33 (1970): 378
Strassfield, R.N.If…: Counterfactuals in the LawThe George Washington Law Review, 60 (1992): 339
Stremitzer, A. ‘Negligence-Based Proportional Liability: How More Lenient Sanctions Lead to Higher Compliance’ (unpublished, available on SSRN:
Street, H.Supervening Events and the Quantum of DamagesLaw Quarterly Review, 78 (1962): 70
Strevens, M.Mackie Remixed’ in Campbell, O'Rourke, Silverstein (eds.) Causation and Explanation, vol. 4 of Topics in Contemporary Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2007)
Tabbach, A. ‘Causation, Discontinuity and Incentives to Choose Levels of Care and Activity Under the Negligence Rule’ Review of Law and Economics, (2008): 133.
Tadros, V.Obligations and Outcomes’ in Cruft, R., Kramer, M.H., and Reiff, M. (eds.) Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff (Oxford University Press, 2011)
Taruffo, M.Rethinking the Standards of ProofThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 51 (2003): 659
Taupitz, J. ‘Proportionalhaftung zur Lösung von Kausalitätsproblemen insbesondere in der Arzthaftung’ in Festschrift für CW Canaris (Tübingen, 2007)
Teitelbaum, J.C.A Unilateral Accident Model Under AmbiguityJournal of Legal Studies, 36 (2007): 431
Teske, W. ‘Anmerkung to BGH 9.6.1994’ Juristenzeitung , (1995): 472
Tettenborn, A.Personal Injury Claims and Assignment: Interesting Times?Professional Negligence, 28 (2012): 61
Tettenborn, A.What is a Loss?’ in Neyers, J., Chamberlain, E., and Pitel, S. Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 2007)
Tettenborn, A.What It's Worth to Do Your BestPace Law Review, 28 (2007): 297
Thompson, J. et al.Malignant Mesothelioma: Development to TherapyJournal of Cell Biochemistry, 115 (2014): 1
Thomson, J.J.Liability and Individualized EvidenceLaw and Contemporary Problems, 49 (1986): 199
Thomson, J.J.Remarks on Causation and LiabilityPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 13 (1984): 101
Thomson, J.J.Some Reflections on Hart and Honoré, Causation in the Law’ in Kramer, M.H. et al. (eds.) The Legacy of HLA Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Thomson, J.J.The Decline of CauseThe Georgetown Law Review, 76 (1987–8): 137
Thomson, J.J.The Trolley ProblemThe Yale Law Journal, 94 (1985): 1395
Tribe, L.H.Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal ProcessHarvard Law Review, 84 (1971): 1329
Tse, M.H.Tests for Factual Causation: Unravelling the Mystery of Material Contribution, Contribution to Risk, the Robust and Pragmatic Approach and the Inference of CausationTorts Law Journal, 16 (2008): 249
Turton, G.A Case for Clarity in Causation?Medical Law Review, 17 (2009): 140
Turton, G.Risk and the Damage Requirement in Negligence LiabilityLegal Studies, 35 (2014): 75
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 185 (1974): 1121
Twerski, A.D.Market Share – A Tale of Two CenturiesBrooklyn Law Review, 55 (1989–90): 869
Twerski, A.D. and Cohen, N.B. ‘Informed Decision Making and the Law of Torts: The Myth of Justiciable Causation’ University of Illinois Law Review, (1988): 607
Twerski, A.D.Resolving the Dilemma of Non-Justiciable Causation in Failure-to-Warn LitigationSouthern California Law Review, 84 (2010): 125
Ulfbeck, V. and Holle, M.Tort Law and Burden of Proof – Comparative Aspects. A Special Case for Enterprise Liability’ in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. (eds.) European Tort Law 2008 (Springer: Vienna, 2008)
Unberath, H. Entry on §259 BGB in Bamberger/Roth Beck'scher Online-Kommentar BGB (2011)
Van Inwagen, P.Free Will Remains a MysteryPhilosophical Perspectives, 14 (2000): 1
Veitch, E.The Many Facets of Cook v Lewis34 Manitoba Law Journal, (2010): 287
Viney, G. ‘La responsabilité des fabricants de medicaments et de vaccines: les affres de la prevue’ Dalloz, (2010): 391
Vioujas, V. ‘La reconnaissance d'un préjudice, distinct de la perte de chance, en cas de manquement du médecin à son obligation d'information : le Conseil d’État suit l'impulsion de la Cour de cassation’ JCP, 46 (2012): 2369
Voyiakis, E.The Great Illusion: Tort Law and Exposure to Danger of Physical HarmModern Law Review, 72 (2009): 909
Waddams, S.M.Damages: Assessment of UncertaintiesJournal of Contract Law, 13 (1998): 1
Wagner, G. ‘Asbestschäden – Bismarck was Right: Anmerkung zu Englisch House of Lords, Entsch v 3.5.2006’ Zeitschrift für europäische Privatrecht, (2007): 1122
Wagner, G. Commentary to §§823 – 840 BGB in Münchener Kommentar zum BGB Band 3: Schuldrecht, Besonderer Teil III §705–853 BGB 5th edition (Munich: Beck, 2009)
Wagner, G.Comparative Tort Law’ in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.) Oxford Handbook on Comparative Law (Paperback Edition) (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Wagner, G. ‘Proportionalhaftung für ärztliche Behandlungsfehler de lege lata’ in: Festschrift für G. Hirsch 2008
Waldron, J.Moments of Carelessness and Massive Loss’ in Owen, D. (ed). Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 1995)
Washington, G.T.Damages in Contract at Common LawLaw Quarterly Review, 48 (1932): 90
Wasserman, D.The Morality of Statistical Proof and the Risk of Mistaken LiabilityCardozo Law Review, 13 (1991): 935
Webb, C.Justifying Damages’ in Neyers, J. and Pitel, S. (eds). Exploring Contract Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009)
Wedgwood, R.Outright BeliefDialectica, 66 (2012): 309
Weigand, T.Loss of Chance in Medical Malpractice: Recent DevelopmentsDefense Counsel Law Journal, 70 (2003): 301
Weigand, T.Lost Chances, Felt Necessities, and the Tale of Two CitiesSuffolk University Law Review, 43 (2010): 327
Weinrib, E.A Step Forward in Factual CausationModern Law Review, 38 (1975): 518
Weinrib, E.Causation and WrongdoingChicago-Kent Law Review, 63 (1987): 407; 2
Weinrib, E. ‘Causal Uncertainty’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Forthcoming
Weinrib, E.Correlativity, Personality and The Emerging Consensus on Corrective JusticeTheoretical Inquiries in Law, 2 (2001): 107
Weinrib, E.Poverty and Property in Kant's System of RightsNotre Dame Law Review, 78 (2003): 795
Weinrib, E.The Passing of Palsgraf?Vanderbilt Law Review, 54 (2001): 803
Weir, T.Loss of a Chance: Compensable in Tort? The Common Law’ in Guillod, O. (ed.) Colloque Développements récents du droit de la responsabilité civile (Zürich : Schulthess, 1991)
Weir, T.Making it More Likely Versus Making it HappenCambridge Law Journal, 61 (2002): 519
Wellington, K.Beyond Single Causative Agents: the Scope of the Fairchild Exception Post-SienkiewiczTorts Law Journal, 20 (2013): 208
Wellman, C.The Rights Forfeiture Theory of PunishmentEthics, 122 (2012): 371
Werro, F. ‘Liability for Harm Caused by Things’ (2010) (available on Social Science Research Network: accessed 1 June 2015)
Williams, B.Moral Luck’ in Williams, B. Moral Luck (Cambridge University Press, 1981)
Williams, G.Case Comment on Cook v LewisCanadian Bar Review, 31 (1953): 315
Williams, G.Which of You Did It?Modern Law Review, 52 (1989): 179
Williamson, T.W. ‘Armchair Philosophy, Metaphysical Modality and Counterfactual Thinking’ (Presidential Address to Aristotelian Society, 2004)
Williamson, T.W.Philosophical Knowledge and Knowledge of Counterfactuals’ in Beyer, Christian and Burri, Alex (eds.) Philosophical Knowledge — Its Possibility and Scope (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007)
Winterton, D. ‘Money Awards Substituting for Performance’ Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, (2012): 626
Wright, Lord. ‘Notes on Causation and Responsibility in English Law’ Cambridge Law Journal, (1955): 163
Wright, R.W.Acts and Omissions as Positive and Negative Causes’ in Neyers, J.W. et al. (eds.) Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 2007)
Wright, R.W.Actual Causation vs. Probabilistic Linkage: The Bane of Economic AnalysisJournal of Legal Studies, 14 (1985): 435
Wright, R.W.Allocating Liability Among Multiple Responsible CausesUniversity of California, Davis Law Review, 21 (1987–8): 1141
Wright, R.W.Causation in Tort LawCalifornia Law Review, 73 (1985): 1737
Wright, R.W.Causation, Responsibility, Risk, Probability, Naked Statistics, and Proof: Pruning the Bramble Bush by Clarifying the ConceptsIowa Law Review, 73 (1989): 1001
Wright, R.W.Hand, Posner, and the Myth of the “Hand Formula”Theoretical Enquiries in Law, 4 (2003): 145
Wright, R.W.Liability for Possible Wrongs: Causation, Statistical Probability and the Burden of Proof’, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 41 (2009): 1295
Wright, R.W.Once More into the Bramble Bush: Duty, Causal Contribution, and the Extent of Legal ResponsibilityVanderbilt Law Review, 54 (2001): 1071
Wright, R.W.Proving Causation: Probability versus Belief’ in Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Wright, R.W.Substantive Corrective JusticeIowa Law Review, 77 (1992): 625
Wright, R.W.The Grounds and Extent of Legal ResponsibilitySan Diego Law Review, 40 (2003): 1425
Wright, R.W.The NESS Account of Natural Causation: A Response to Criticisms’ in Goldberg, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011)
Yeung, K. and Horder, J. ‘How Can the Criminal Law Support the Provision of Quality in Healthcare’ BMJ Quality Safety (2014) (Online first: 5 March, 2014)
Zamir, E. and Ritov, I.Loss Aversion, Omission Bias, and the Burden of ProofThe Journal of Legal Studies, 41 (2012): 165
Zardini, E.Luminosity and VaguenessDialectica, 66 (2012): 375
Zilich, G.Cutting through the Confusion of the Loss-of-Chance Doctrine: A New Cause of Action or a New Standard of Proof?Cleveland State Law Journal, 50 (2002–3): 273
Zipursky, B.C.Civil Recourse, not Corrective Justice’, Georgetown Law Journal, 91 (2003): 695
Zipursky, B.C.Evidence, Unfairness and Market-Share Liability: A Comment on GeistfeldUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, 156 (2007): 126
Zipursky, B.C.Two Dimensions of Responsibility in Crime, Tort and Moral LuckTheoretical Inquiries In Law, 9 (2008): 97