Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan 2000. ‘Hard and soft law in international governance’. International Organization 54(3): 421–456.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J. 2008. ‘Agents or trustees? International courts in their political context’. European Journal of International Relations 14(1): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E. 2003. ‘Hegemonic international law revisited’. American Journal of International Law 97(4): 873–888.Google Scholar

AMISOM 2013. ‘Easy-to-Read-Guide on AMISOM Policy on Prevention and Response to Sexual Exploitation and Abuse’. http://amisom-au.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Easy-to-read-guide_AMISOM-SEA-POLICY.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Amnesty International 1994. ‘Peace-keeping and Human Rights’. AI Index IOR 40/01/94. www.amnesty.org/en/documents/IOR40/001/1994/en/ (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Amnesty International 2004. ‘Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina: The Apparent Lack of Accountability of International Peacekeeping Forces in Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina’. AI Index EUR 05/002/2004. www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR05/002/2004/en (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Amnesty International 2007. ‘Afghanistan. Detainees Transferred to Torture: ISAF Complicity?’. AI Index ASA 11/011/2007. www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa11/011/2007/en/(9 January 2017).Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael N. and Finnemore, Martha 2004. Rules for the World. International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Bissell, Richard E. and Nanwani, Suresh 2009. ‘Multilateral Development Bank accountability mechanisms: Developments and challenges’. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 6(1): 2–55.Google Scholar

Böhling, Kathrin 2007. Opening up the Black Box: Organizational Learning in the European Commission. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen and Keohane, Robert O. 2006. ‘The legitimacy of global governance institutions’. Ethics & International Affairs 20(4): 405–437.Google Scholar

Child, John and Heavens, Sally J. 2001. ‘The social constitution of organizations and its implications for organizational learning’, in Dierkes, , Berthoin Antal, , Child, and Nonaka, (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 308–326.Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew 2006. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, Andrew F. 2002. ‘Like-minded nations, NGOs and the changing pattern of diplomacy within the UN system: An introductory perspective’, in Cooper, , English, and Thakur, (eds.), Enhancing Global Governance: Towards a New Diplomacy? Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Cooper, Scott, Hawkins, Darren G., Jacoby, Wade and Nielson, Daniel 2008. ‘Yielding sovereignty to international institutions: Bringing system structure back in’. International Studies Review 10(3): 501–524.Google Scholar

Council of Europe 2002. ‘Kosovo: The Human Rights Situation and the Fate of Persons Displaced from Their Homes’, Report by Alvaro Gil-Robles, Commissioner for Human Rights for the Attention of the Parliamentary Assembly and the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. CommDH(2002)11. https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=982119&-Site=COE.Google Scholar

Court of First Instance 2006. ‘Organisation des Modjahedines du Peuple d’Iran v. Council of the European Union’. Court of First Instance, Case T-228/02, 12 December 2006, [2006] ECR II–4665.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1999. ‘Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view’, in Shapiro, and Hacker-Cordon, (eds.), Democracy’s Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, Klaus 2014. ‘Global democracy and the democratic minimum: Why a procedural account alone is insufficient’. European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 1124–1147.Google Scholar

Elliott, Michael A. 2007. ‘Human rights and the triumph of the individual in world culture’. Cultural Sociology 1(3): 343–363.Google Scholar

Eriksson, Mikael 2009. ‘In Search of a Due Process: Listing and Delisting Practices in the European Union’. Department of Peace and Conflict Resolution, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. http://pcr.uu.se/digitalAssets/165/165538_1in_search_091119.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

European Court of Justice 2008. ‘Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council and Commission’. European Court of Justice, Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, 3 September 2008, [2008] ECR I–6351.Google Scholar

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 2010. ‘Policy on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples’. www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1857e/i1857e00.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. 1988. Human Rights and US Foreign Policy: Congress Reconsidered. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.Google Scholar

Freund, Corinna and Rittberger, Volker 2001. ‘Utilitarian-liberal foreign policy theory’, in Rittberger, (ed.), German Foreign Policy since Unification. Theories and Case Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 68–104.Google Scholar

Gehring, Thomas and Oberthür, Sebastian 2009. ‘The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions’. European Journal of International Relations 15(1): 125–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom 2005. ‘International Judicial Lawmaking’. Law and Economics Working Paper No. 26, College of Law, University of Illinois, Illinois.Google Scholar

Guild, Elspeth 2008. ‘The uses and abuses of counter-terrorism policies in Europe: The case of the “terrorist lists”’. Journal of Common Market Studies 46(1): 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Tsutsui, Kiyoteru and Meyer, John W. 2008. ‘International human rights law and the politics of legitimation: Repressive states and human rights treaties’. International Sociology 23(1): 115–141.Google Scholar

Hasenclever, Andreas 2001. Die Macht der Moral in der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L. and Tierney, Michael J. (eds.) 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hazelzet, Hadewych 2001. ‘Carrots or Sticks: EU and US Reactions to Human Rights Violations (1989–2000)’. PhD Thesis, Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar

Heupel, Monika 2012. ‘Judicial policymaking in the EU courts: Safeguarding due process in EU sanctions policy against terror suspects’, in Della, Porta, and Lindekilde, (eds.), Anti-Terror Policies Ten Years after 9/11, special issue, European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research 18(4): 311–327.Google Scholar

Heupel, Monika, Hirschmann, Gisela and Zürn, Michael 2015. ‘Internationale Organisationen und der Schutz der Menschenrechte’, in Conceição-Heldt, , Koch, and Liese, (eds.), Internationale Organisationen, special issue 49, Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 423–451.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary 2003. ‘Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance’. American Political Science Review 97(2): 233–243.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary 2015. ‘Delegation and pooling in international organizations’. Review of International Organizations 10(3): 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John 2001. After Victory. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

ILA (International Law Association) 2004. ‘Berlin Conference. Accountability of International Organisations: Final Conference Report’. www.ila-hq.org/download.cfm/docid/6B708C25-4D6D-42E2-8385DADA752815E8 (2 November 2015).Google Scholar

ILC (International Law Commission) 2011. ‘Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations’. http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_11_2011.pdf (2 November 2015).Google Scholar

IMF (International Monetary Fund) 1998. ‘External Evaluation of the ESAF: Report by a Group of Independent Experts’. www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/extev/index.htm (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

IMF (International Monetary Fund) 2003. ‘Evaluation Report: Fiscal Adjustment in IMF-Supported Programs. Report by the Independent Evaluation Office’. www.imf.org/external/np/ieo/2003/fis/ (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Isiksel, Turkuler and Thies, Anne (eds.) 2013. ‘Changing subjects: Rights, remedies and responsibilities of individuals under global legal pluralism’, special issue, Global Constitutionalism 2(2): 151–159.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn 1999. ‘Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics’. International Social Science Journal 51(159): 89–101.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1980. ‘The theory of hegemonic stability and changes in international economic regimes’, in George, , Holsti, and Siverson, (eds.), Change in the International System. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 131–162.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew and Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2000. ‘Legalized dispute resolution: Interstate and transnational’. International Organization 54(3): 457–488.Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P. 1986. ‘International public goods without international government’. The American Economic Review 76(1): 1–13.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti 2004. ‘International law and hegemony: A reconfiguration’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17(2): 197–218.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico 2005. ‘International law in times of hegemony: Unequal power and the shaping of the international legal order’. European Journal of International Law 16(3): 369–408.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leibfried, Stephan and Zürn, Michael (eds.) 2005. Transformations of the State? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levitt, Barbara and March, James G. 1988. ‘Organizational learning’. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 319–340.Google Scholar

Mattli, Walter and Slaughter, Anne-Marie 1998. ‘Revisiting the European Court of Justice’. International Organization 52(1): 177–209.Google Scholar

Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M. and Ramirez, Francisco O. 1997. ‘World society and the nation-state’. American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144–181.Google Scholar

Meyer, John W. and Rowan, Brian 1977. ‘Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony’. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew 2005. ‘The paradox of US human rights policy’, in Ignatieff, (ed.), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 147–197.Google Scholar

Mueller, John and Mueller, Karl 1999. ‘Sanctions of mass destruction’. Foreign Affairs 78: 43–52.Google Scholar

Nolan, Aoife, Porter, Bruce and Langford, Malcolm 2007. ‘The Justiciability of Social and Economic Rights: An Updated Appraisal’. Working Paper No. 15/2007, Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, NYU School of Law, New York.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André 2009. ‘The internationalized rule of law’. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1(1): 74–78.Google Scholar

Operations Evaluation Department 2001. ‘OED Review of the World Bank’s Performance on the Environment’. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/06/1490093/oed-review-banks-performance-environment.Google Scholar

OSCE 2002. ‘Review of the Criminal Justice System (September 2001–February 2002)’. OSCE Mission in Kosovo, Department of Human Rights and Rule of Law. www.osce.org/kosovo/13043.Google Scholar

Park, Susan 2010. World Bank Group Interactions with Environmentalists. Changing International Organisation Identities. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Reinisch, August 2000. International Organizations before National Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reinisch, August 2001. ‘Securing the accountability of international organizations’. Global Governance 7(2): 131–149.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas and Sikkink, Kathryn 1999. ‘The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: Introduction’, in Risse, , Ropp, and Sikkink, (eds.), The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

Rosenau, James N. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ryngaert, Cedric 2010. ‘The immunity of international organizations before domestic courts: Recent trends’. International Organizations Law Review 7(1): 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

SADC (Southern Afican Development Community) 2012. ‘Policy for Strategy Development, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation’. www.sadc.int/files/8713/6621/3373/SPME_Policy_English_Final.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Sánchez-Barrueco, María L. 2011. ‘The promotion and protection of human rights during common security and defence policy operations: In-between a spreading state of mind and an unsolved concern’, in Wetzel, (ed.), The EU as A ‘Global Player’ in Human Rights? London: Routledge, pp. 149–165.Google Scholar

Save the Children UK 2002. ‘Note for Implementing and Operational Partners by UNHCR and Save the Children-UK on Sexual Violence & Exploitation: The Experience of Refugee Children in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone Based on Initial Findings and Recommendations from Assessment Mission 22 October–30 November 2001’. www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/sexual_violence_and_exploitation_1.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, James M. 1997. ‘In the loop: Congressional influence in American foreign policy’. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 25(1): 47–75.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tallberg, Jonas 2000. ‘Supranational influence in EU enforcement: The ECJ and the principle of state liability’. Journal of European Public Policy 7(1): 104–121.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2004. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel 1981. ‘The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice’. Science 211(4481): 453–458.Google Scholar

Udall, Lori 1998. ‘The World Bank and public accountability: Has anything changed?’, in Fox, and Brown, (eds.), The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 391–436.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly 2005. ‘A Comprehensive Strategy to Eliminate Future Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations’ [the ‘Zeid Report’]. UN Doc. A/59/710. www.cfr.org/women/comprehensive-strategy-eliminate-future-sexual-exploitation-abuse-un-peacekeeping-operations-zeid-report/p23456 (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

UN Security Council 2005. ‘Note by the President of the Security Council’. UN Doc. S/2005/841. 29 December.Google Scholar

UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) 2003. ‘Procedural Standards for Refugee Status Determination under UNHCR’s Mandate’. www.refworld.org/docid/42d66dd84.html (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) 2004. ‘Code of Conduct and Explanatory Notes’. www.unhcr.org/422dbc89a.html (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

UNMIK (United Nations Mission in Kosovo) Ombudsperson 2000. ‘Special Report No. 1’. www.ombudspersonkosovo.org/repository/docs/E4010426a_874491.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Verdirame, Guglielmo 2011. The UN and Human Rights: Who Guards the Guardians? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Viola, Lora A., Snidal, Duncan and Zürn, Michael 2015. ‘Sovereign (in)equality in the evolution of the international system’, in Huber, , Lange, , Leibfried, , Levy, , Nullmeier, and Stephens, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 221–236.Google Scholar

Wade, Robert H. 1997. ‘Greening the Bank: The struggle over the environment. 1970–1995’, in Kapur, , Lewis, and Webb, (eds.), The World Bank: Its First Half Century, Vols. 1. 2 vols. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 611–734.Google Scholar

Wallensteen, Peter, Staibano, Carina and Eriksson, Mikael 2003. ‘Making Targeted Sanctions Effective: Guidelines for the Implementation of UN Policy Options’. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/L-External-publications/2003/2003%20Uppsala%20Targeted%20sanctions%20effective.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Warleigh, Alex 2001. ‘“Europeanizing” civil society: NGOs as agents of political socialization’. Journal of Common Market Studies 39(4): 619–639.Google Scholar

Watson Institute 2001. ‘Targeted Financial Sanctions: A Manual for Design and Implementation. Contributions from the Interlaken Process’. Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI. www.watsoninstitute.org/tfs/TFS.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Wellens, Karel 2002. Remedies against International Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wessel, Jared 2006. ‘Judicial policymaking at the International Criminal Court: An institutional guide to analyzing international adjudication’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 44(2): 377–452.Google Scholar

White House 2002. ‘National Security Presidential Directive NSPD-22’. www.combat-trafficking.army.mil/documents/policy/NSPD-22.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Wilde, Ralph 2006. ‘Enhancing accountability at the international level: The tension between international organization and member state responsibility and the underlying issues at stake’. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 12(2): 395–415.Google Scholar

World Bank 2010. ‘Analyzing the Effects of Policy Reforms on the Poor: An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of World Bank Support to Poverty and Social Impact Analyses’. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPSIA/Resources/IEG_psia_full.pdf (3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan, Brems, Eva, Smis, Stefaan and Schmitt, Pierre 2010. Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael 2004. ‘Global governance and legitimacy problems’. Government and Opposition 39(2): 260–287.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael 2010. ‘Global Governance as Multi-Level Governance’, in Enderlein, , Wälti, and Zürn, (eds.), Handbook on Multi-level Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 80–99.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, Keller, Xaver, Lockwood Payton, Autumn M. and Tokhi, Alexandros 2014. ‘International Authority Data Project’. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Convention of the ISA, Toronto, 26–29 March.Google Scholar