Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- 14 Spacetime Symmetries in Quantum Mechanics
- 15 Symmetry, Structure, and Emergent Subsystems
- 16 Majorization, across the (Quantum) Universe
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
15 - Symmetry, Structure, and Emergent Subsystems
from Part IV - Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2019
Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- 14 Spacetime Symmetries in Quantum Mechanics
- 15 Symmetry, Structure, and Emergent Subsystems
- 16 Majorization, across the (Quantum) Universe
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quantum WorldsPerspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 294 - 322Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Andersen, M. E. S., Harshman, N. L., and Zinner, N. T. (2017). “Hybrid model of separable, zero-range, few-body interactions in one-dimensional harmonic traps,” Physical Review A, 96: 033616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. A. (1956). “Degeneracy of the n-dimensional, isotropic, harmonic oscillator,” Physical Review, 103: 1119–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, M. T., Guan, X.-W., Oelkers, N., and Lee, C. (2005). “The 1d interacting Bose gas in a hard wall box,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 38: 7787–7806.Google Scholar
Benatti, F., Floreanini, R., and Titimbo, K. (2014). “Entanglement of identical particles,” Open Systems & Information Dynamics, 21: 1440003.Google Scholar
Bohigas, O., Giannoni, M. J., and Schmit, C. (1984). “Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws,” Physical Review Letters, 52: 1–4.Google Scholar
Bohm, A. and Gadella, M. (1989). Dirac Kets, Gamow Vectors and Gel’fand Triplets: Lecture Notes in Physics No. 348. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bohm, A. and Harshman, N. L. (1998). “Quantum theory in the rigged Hilbert space − irreversibility from causality,” pp. 179–237 in Bohm, A., Doebner, H.-D., and Kielanowski, P. (eds.), Irreversibility and Causality Semigroups and Rigged Hilbert Spaces: Lecture Notes in Physics. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Caux, J.-S. and Mossel, J. (2011). “Remarks on the notion of quantum integrability,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2011: P02023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazalilla, M. A., Citro, R., Giamarchi, T., Orignac, E., and Rigol, M. (2011). “One-dimensional bosons: From condensed matter systems to ultracold gases,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 83: 1405–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, F., Khare, A., and Sukhatme, U. (1995). “Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics,” Physics Reports, 251: 267–385.Google Scholar
Fernández, F. M. (2013). “On the symmetry of the quantum-mechanical particle in a cubic box,” arXiv:1310.5136.Google Scholar
Fortin, S. and Lombardi, O. (2016). “A top-down view of the classical limit of quantum mechanics,” pp. 435–468 in Kastner, R. E., Jeknić-Dugić, J., and Jaroszkiewicz, G. (eds.), Quantum Structural Studies. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Girardeau, M. (1960). “Relationship between systems of impenetrable bosons and fermions in one dimension,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1: 516–523.Google Scholar
Gómez, I., Losada, M., and Lombardi, O. (2017). “About the concept of quantum chaos,” Entropy, 19: 205.Google Scholar
Guan, X.-W., Batchelor, M. T., and Lee, C. (2013). “Fermi gases in one dimension: From Bethe ansatz to experiments,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 85: 1633–1691.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, M. C. (1990). Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics: Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics No. 1. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Haag, R. (1992). Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras: Texts and Monographs in Physics. Berlin-New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Harshman, N. L. (2005). “Basis states for relativistic dynamically entangled particles,” Physical Review A, 71: 022312.Google Scholar
Harshman, N. L. (2014). “Spectroscopy for a few atoms harmonically trapped in one dimension,” Physical Review A, 89: 033633.Google Scholar
Harshman, N. L. (2016a) “One-dimensional traps, two-body interactions, few-body symmetries: I. One, two, and three particles,” Few-Body Systems, 57: 11–43.Google Scholar
Harshman, N. L. (2016b) “One-dimensional traps, two-body interactions, few-body symmetries: II. N particles,” Few-Body Systems, 57: 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harshman, N. L. (2016c). “Symmetry and natural quantum structures for three-particles in one-dimension,” pp. 373–400 in Kastner, R. E., Jeknić-Dugić, J., and Jaroszkiewicz, G. (eds.), Quantum Structural Studies. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Harshman, N. L. (2017a). “Infinite barriers and symmetries for a few trapped particles in one dimension,” Physical Review A, 95: 053616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harshman, N. L. (2017b). “Identical wells, symmetry breaking, and the near-unitary limit,” Few-Body Systems, 58: 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harshman, N. L., Olshanii, M., Dehkharghani, A. S., Volosniev, A. G., Jackson, S. G., and Zinner, N. T. (2017). “Integrable families of hard-core particles with unequal masses in a one-dimensional harmonic trap,” Physical Review X, 7: 041001.Google Scholar
Harshman, N. L. and Ranade, K. S. (2011). “Observables can be tailored to change the entanglement of any pure state,” Physical Review A, 84: 012303.Google Scholar
Harshman, N. L. and Wickramasekara, S. (2007a). “Galilean and dynamical invariance of entanglement in particle scattering,” Physical Review Letters, 98: 080406–4.Google Scholar
Harshman, N. L. and Wickramasekara, S. (2007b). “Tensor product structures, entanglement, and particle scattering,” Open Systems & Information Dynamics, 14: 341–351.Google Scholar
Jeknić-Dugić, J., Arsenijević, M., and Dugić, M. (2013). Quantum Structures: A View of the Quantum World. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Leinaas, J. M. and Myrheim, J. (1977). “On the theory of identical particles,” Nuovo Cimento B, 37: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Leblond, J.-M. (1967). “Nonrelativistic particles and wave equations,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, 6: 286–311.Google Scholar
Leyvraz, F., Frank, A., Lemus, R., and Andrés, M. V. (1997). “Accidental degeneracy in a simple quantum system: A new symmetry group for a particle in an impenetrable square-well potential,” American Journal of Physics, 65: 1087–1094.Google Scholar
Lieb, E. H. and Liniger, W. (1963). “Exact analysis of an interacting bose gas. I. The general solution and the ground state,” Physical Review, 130: 1605–1616.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O. and Fortin, S. (2015). “The role of symmetry in the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics, 12: 255–275.Google Scholar
Louck, J. D. (1965). “Group theory of harmonic oscillators in n-dimensional space,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, 6: 1786–1804.Google Scholar
Oelkers, N., Batchelor, M. T., Bortz, M., and Guan, X.-W. (2006). “Bethe ansatz study of one-dimensional Bose and Fermi gases with periodic and hard wall boundary conditions,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 39: 1073–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olshanski, G. (2003). “The problem of harmonic analysis on the in_nite-dimensional unitary group,” Journal of Functional Analysis, 205: 464–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, S., Tsujimoto, S., and Vinet, L. (2012). “Families of superintegrable Hamiltonians constructed from exceptional polynomials,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 45: 405202.Google Scholar
Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J., and Bertani, P. (1994). “Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator,” Physical Review Letters, 73: 58–61.Google Scholar
Sen, D. (1999). “Perturbation theory for singular potentials in quantum mechanics,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, 14: 1789–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serwane, F., Zürn, G., Lompe, T., Ottenstein, T. B., Wenz, A. N., and Jochim, S. (2011). “Deterministic preparation of a tunable few-fermion system,” Science, 332: 336–338.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. B. (1974). “Degeneracy in the particle-in-a-box problem,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematica, Nuclear and General, 7: 1537–1543.Google Scholar
Streater, R. F. and Wightman, A. S. (1964). PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That: The Mathematical Physics Monograph Series. New York: W.A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Sutherland, B. (2004). Beautiful Models: 70 Years of Exactly Solved Quantum Many-Body Problems. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1995). The Quantum Theory of Fields, 1st edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenz, A. N., Zürn, G., Murmann, S., Brouzos, I., Lompe, T., and Jochim, S. (2013). “From few to many: Observing the formation of a Fermi sea one atom at a time,” Science, 342: 457–460.Google Scholar
Wigner, E. P. (1939). “On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group,” Annals of Mathematics, 40: 149–204.Google Scholar
Wigner, E. P. (1959). Group Theory and its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wilczek, F. (1982). “Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin particles,” Physical Review Letters, 49: 957–959.Google Scholar
Wilczek, F. (2015). A Beautiful Question: Finding Nature’s Deep Design. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Yang, C. N. (1967). “Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction,” Physical Review Letters, 19: 1312–1315.Google Scholar
Zanardi, P. (2001). “Virtual quantum subsystems,” Physical Review Letters, 87: 077901.Google Scholar
Zanardi, P., Lidar, D. A., and Lloyd, S. (2004). “Quantum tensor product structures are observable induced,” Physical Review Letters, 92: 060402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanardi, P. and Lloyd, S. (2004). “Universal control of quantum subspaces and subsystems,” Physical Review A, 69: 022313.Google Scholar
Zürn, G., Serwane, F., Lompe, T., Wenz, A. N., Ries, M. G., Bohn, J. E., and Jochim, S. (2012). “Fermionization of two distinguishable fermions,” Physical Review Letters, 108: 075303.Google Scholar
Zürn, G., Wenz, A. N., Murmann, S., Bergschneider, A., Lompe, T., and Jochim, S. (2013). “Pairing in few-fermion systems with attractive interactions,” Physical Review Letters, 111: 175302.Google Scholar