Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

11 - Feminist phronesis and technologies of citizenship


When I first read Bent Flyvbjerg's work, I was struck with a kind of profound gratitude. ‘Ah,’ I thought, ‘now here's something I can actually use.’ For those of us undertaking collaborative research with our neighbours or with social movements, phronesis can feel like a longed-for ally, a companion in a struggle that can sometimes feel isolating. The questions he raises are familiar to engaged academics trying to bridge analysis, social action and a commitment to scholarship for social change: how do we develop ‘wisdom that works’ in specific social contexts, while tackling complex global problems?; how do we create mechanisms for uncovering and validating collective, real-world knowledge?; how do we make informed and democratic decisions about critical issues in the face of contingency, dissent, difference and change? Phronesis is useful because it gives us permission to finally abandon the failed project of producing a social science focused on universal truth, broad generalizability, prediction and a stance of disinterested neutrality. Better yet, it challenges us to invent a better social science, one that connects research to practical reasoning and social action. I am inspired by the challenge levied by Making Social Science Matter (2001), and the wealth of thoughtful scholarship it has generated. Flyvbjerg's reinterpretation of phronesis opens up intellectual room in crowded disciplinary halls, providing vital public space to explore knowledge that matters.

One aspect of phronetic social science that has been underexplored, however, is its close links to feminist epistemology and sociology of knowledge. After getting over the initial pleasure of recognition, my next response to Flyvbjerg's work was puzzlement. I felt like I was standing between two beloved friends at a party, gaping, wondering, ‘how is it possible that the two of you haven't met?’ The resonances between phronetic social science and current feminist scholarship into how knowledge is created and legitimated are obvious, varied and powerful.

Campbell, Marie LouiseGregor, Frances Mary 2004 Mapping Social Relations: A Primer in Doing Institutional EthnographyWalnut Creek, CARowman Littlefield AltaMira
Collins, Patricia Hill 1998 Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for JusticeMinneapolis, MNUniversity of Minnesota Press
Collins, Patricia Hill 2000 Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of EmpowermentNew YorkRoutledge
Combahee River Collective 1977 A Black Feminist StatementManning Marable and Leith MullingsLet Nobody Turn Us Around: Voices of Resistance, Reform, and Renewal: An African American AnthologyNew YorkRowman & Littlefield524
Crenshaw, Kimberlé 1991 Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of ColorStanford Law Review 43 1241
Crenshaw, KimberléThomas, Sheila 2004 Intersectionality: The Double Bind of Race and GenderPerspectives: The Quarterly Magazine For and About Women
Cruikshank, Barbara 1999 The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other SubjectsIthaca, NYCornell University Press
Eubanks, Virginia 2011 Digital Dead End: Fighting for Social Justice in the Information AgeCambridge, MAMIT Press
Flyvbjerg, Bent 2001 Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it can Succeed AgainCambridge University Press
Haraway, Donna 1990 Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern ScienceNew YorkRoutledge
Haraway, Donna 1991 Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of NatureNew YorkRoutledge
Haraway, Donna 1997 Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and TechnoscienceNew YorkRoutledge
Haraway, DonnaGoodeve, Thyrza Nichols 2000 How Like a Leaf: An Interview with Thyrza Nichols GoodeveNew YorkRoutledge
Harding, Sandra G 1991 Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's LivesIthaca, NYCornell University Press
Harding, Sandra G 1998 Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and EpistemologiesBloomington, INIndiana University Press
Harding, Sandra G 2003 The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political ControversiesNew YorkRoutledge
Harding, Sandra G 2006 Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial IssuesChampaign, ILUniversity of Illinois Press
Harding, SandraGrewal, InderpalKaplan, CarenWiegman, Robyn 2008 Science from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and ModernitiesDurham, NCDuke University Press
Highlander Research and Education Center 1998
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1969 On the Genealogy of MoralsNew YorkVintage Books
Sandoval, Chela 1995 New Sciences: Cyborg Feminism and the Methodology of the OppressedGray, Chris HablesThe Cyborg HandbookNew YorkRoutledge
Smith, Barbara 1998 The Truth That Never Hurts: Writings on Race, Gender and FreedomNew Brunswick, NJRutgers University Press
Smith, Dorothy E. 1987 The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist SociologyHanover, NHNortheastern University Press
Smith, Dorothy E. 1990 The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of KnowledgeUniversity of Toronto Press
Smith, Dorothy E. 1993 Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of RulingNew YorkRoutledge
Smith, Dorothy E. 1999 Writing the Social: Critique, Theory and InvestigationsUniversity of Toronto Press
Smith, Dorothy E. 2006 Institutional Ethnography as PracticeNew YorkRowman & Littlefield
Smith, Dorothy E. 2007 Institutional Ethnography: From a Sociology for Women to a Sociology for PeopleHesse-Biber, Sharlene NagyHandbook of Feminist Research: Theory and PraxisThousand Oaks, CASage409
Smith, Dorothy E 2010
Wylie, Alison 2003 Why Standpoint MattersFigueroa, R.Harding, S.Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and TechnologyNew YorkRoutledge26
Eubanks, Virginia 2011