Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T06:04:29.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Insurance Industry and Integrated Project Management Frameworks in Post-Disaster Reconstruction

Recovery after the 2010 and 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Patrick Daly
Affiliation:
Earth Observatory of Singapore
R. Michael Feener
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rebuilding Asia Following Natural Disasters
Approaches to Reconstruction in the Asia-Pacific Region
, pp. 339 - 366
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Government Department of Infrastructure and Transport (2011). National alliance contracting guidelines: guidance note 5 developing the target out turn cost in alliance contracting. Canberra. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/infrastructure/nacg/files/NACG_GN5.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015)Google Scholar
Baroudi, B., & Rapp, R.R. (2011). A project management approach to disaster response and recovery operations. Paper presented at the 36th Australasian University Building Educators Association Conference, Gold Coast. http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=aubea_2011 (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Baroudi, B., (2014). Stakeholder management in disaster restoration projects. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment. 5 (2). pp. 182193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C., Seville, E., & Vargo, J. (2013). The role of insurance in organisational recovery following the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes. Auckland: Resilient Organisations Research Report 2013/04. www.resorgs.org.nz/images/stories/pdfs/Organisationsfacingcrisis/the_role_of_insurance.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Brunsdon, D., Hare, J., & Stannard, M. (2012). The impact of the Canterbury earthquake sequence on the engineering profession in New Zealand. Paper presented at the Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2012 Conference, 7–9 December, Gold Coast.Google Scholar
CERA (2011). Briefing for the incoming Minister December 2011. http://cera.govt.nz/sites/default/files/common/cera-briefing-for-the-incoming-minister-december-2011-20120202.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
CERA (2012). Recovery strategy for Greater Christchurch. Christchurch. http://cera.govt.nz/sites/default/files/common/recovery-strategy-for-greater-christchurch.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
CERA (2013). Crown and council agree recovery costs. Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) Media Release. 27 June 2013. http://cera.govt.nz/news/2013/crown-and-council-agree-recovery-costs-27-june-2013 (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Chang-Richards, A., Seville, E., Wilkinson, S., & Walker, B. (2013). Building natural disaster response capacity: sound workforce strategies for recovery and reconstruction in APEC economies: final report. Auckland: Resilient Organizations. www.resorgs.org.nz/images/stories/pdfs/Reconstructionfollowingdisaster/apec-natural-disasters-workforce-project.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Chang-Richards, Y., Vargo, J., & Seville, E. (2013). Organisational resilience to natural disasters: New Zealand’s experience. China Policy Review. 10. pp. 117119.Google Scholar
Chang-Richards, Y., Wilkinson, S., Potangaroa, R., & Seville, E. (2013). Resource challenges for housing reconstruction: a longitudinal study of the Australian bushfires. Disaster Prevention and Management. 22 (2). pp. 172181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang-Richards, Y., Wilkinson, S., & Seville, E. (2012a). Resourcing of the Canterbury Rebuild: Changes and Emerging Themes. Auckland: The University of Auckland, BRANZ and Resilient Organisations. www.resorgs.org.nz/images/stories/pdfs/report%20june%202012%20-%20resourcing%20the%20canterbury%20rebuild%20changes%20%20emerging%20themes.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Chang-Richards, Y., Wilkinson, S., (2012b). Resourcing the Canterbury rebuild: issues and outlook – a supplementary report. Auckland: The University of Auckland, BRANZ, and Resilient Organisations. www.resorgs.org.nz/images/stories/pdfs/Reconstructionfollowingdisaster/resource%20supplementary%20report%20%20finalised%20in%20june%202012.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Chang-Richards, Y., Wilkinson, S., Seville, E., & Brunsdon, D. (2014). Workforce behaviour and business responses: case studies of construction organisations. Resilient Organisations Research Report 2014/03. www.resorgs.org.nz/images/stories/pdfs/Reconstructionfollowingdisaster/resourcing_case_study_may2014.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Comerio, M.C. (2013). Housing recovery in Chile: a qualitative mid-program review. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/peer_reports/reports_2013/webPEER-2013-01-Comerio.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Cowan, H., & Simpson, I. (2011). Planning for disasters and responding to unforeseen complexity: the first large test for the New Zealand Earthquake Commission. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Aon Benfield Hazards Conference: Catastrophic Complexity, 29 September–1 October 2011, Surfers Paradise.Google Scholar
Crawford, L., Langston, C., & Bajracharya, B. (2013). Participatory project management for improved disaster resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment. 4 (3). pp. 317333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, T.K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). A risk perception model of alliance structuring. Journal of International Management. 7 (1). pp. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, C.H., Johnson, C., Lizarralde, G., Dikmen, N., & Sliwinski, A. (2007). Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat International. 31 (1). pp. 100115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Man, A.-P., & Roijakkers, N. (2009). Alliance governance: balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. Long Range Planning. 42 (1). pp. 7595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DoL (2011). A Changing Landscape: The Impact of the Earthquakes on Christchurch Workplaces. Labour & Immigration Research Centre. Wellington: Department of Labour. www.dol.govt.nz/publications/research/earthquakes-impact-in-christchurch-workplaces/earthquake-impact-in-christchruch.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Douglas, E.E., & Rapp, R. (2011). Project controls for disaster restoration and reconstruction. Cost Engineering. 53 (1). pp. 2634.Google Scholar
Elwood, K.J., Pampanin, S., & Kam, W.Y. (2012). 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake and implications for the design of concrete structures. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, 1–4 March 2012, Tokyo.Google Scholar
EQC (2012). Managing the natural disaster fund. www.eqc.govt.nz/about-eqc/our-role/ndfGoogle Scholar
EQC (2013). Third anniversary of 2010 earthquake brings major claim milestones. 3 September 2013. www.eqc.govt.nz/news/third-anniversary-of-2010-quake-brings-major-claim-milestones (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Freame, J., Redlich, S., & Nicoll, B. (2013). 2009 Victorian bushfires after the crisis: recovery four years on. Paper presented at The Australian and New Zealand Disaster and Emergency Management Conference, 28–30 May 2013, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Freeman, P.K. (2004). Allocation of post-disaster reconstruction financing to housing. Building Research and Information. 32 (5). pp. 427437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GNS Science (2011). The hidden fault that caused the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. www.gns.cri.nz/Home/Our-Science/Natural-Hazards/Recent-Events/Canterbury-quake/Hidden-fault (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Hatton, T., Seville, E., & Vargo, J. (2012). Improving the resilience of SMEs: policy and practice in New Zealand. Christchurch: Resilient Organisations Research Report 2012/012. www.resorgs.org.nz/images/stories/pdfs/apec%20sme%20resilience%20policy%20final%20report.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Ingham, J.M., & Griffith, M.C. (2011). The performance of unreinforced masonry buildings in the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquake swarm. Report to the Royal Commission of Inquiry. http://masonryretrofit.org.nz/CE/1.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Johnson, L. (2014). Developing a local recovery management framework: report on the post-disaster strategies and approaches taken by three local governments in the U.S. following major disasters. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters. 32 (2). pp. 1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L., & Mamula-Seadon, L. (2014). Transforming governance: how national policies and organizations for managing disaster recovery evolved following the 4 September 2010 and 22 February 2011 Canterbury earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra. 30 (1). pp. 577605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L.A. (2000). Kobe and Northridge reconstruction: a look at outcomes of varying public and private housing reconstruction financing models. Paper presented at the EuroConference on Global Change and Catastrophe Risk Management: Earthquake Risks in Europe, 8 July 2000, Laxenburg.Google Scholar
Johnson, L.A., & Olshansky, R.B. (2013). The road to recovery: governing post-disaster reconstruction. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. https://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/2259_The-Road-to-Recovery–Governing-Post-Disaster-Reconstruction (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
King, A., Middleton, D., Brown, C., Johnson, D., & Johal, S. (2014). Insurance: its role in recovery from the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra. 30 (1). pp. 475491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koria, M. (2009). Managing for innovation in large and complex recovery programmes: tsunami lessons from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Project Management. 27 (2). pp. 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusumasari, B., Alam, Q., & Siddiqui, K. (2010). Resource capability for local government in managing disaster. Disaster Prevention and Management. 19 (4). pp. 438451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Masurier, J. (2014). Briefing: affirming alliancing procurement for Christchurch rebuild, New Zealand. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. www.constructing.co.nz/files/file/319/ICE%20proceedings%20SCIRT%20briefing,%20Dr%20Jason%20Le%20Masurier%20JAN15.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Love, P.E.D., Davis, P.R., & Misty, D. (2010). Price competitive alliance projects: identification of success factors for public clients. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 136 (9). pp. 947956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MBIE (2013). Housing pressures in Christchurch: a summary of the evidence. Wellington. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). www.building.govt.nz/UserFiles/File/Publications/Sector/pdf/christchurch-housing-report.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
MCDEM (2005). Focus on Recovery: A Holistic Framework for Recovery in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management. www.recoveryplatform.org/assets/publication/FocusOnRecovery.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
McNaughton, E. (2013). Leadership, wisdom and the post-disaster recovery process. A report submitted to the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust and New Zealand Red Cross. https://recoverymatters1.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/elizabeth-mcnaughton-winston-churchill-report-2013-final1.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
NZCID (2013). Insights into Canterbury: Findings of Research on the Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery, June 2013. Auckland: New Zealand Council for Infrastructure Development (NZCID).Google Scholar
Office of the Auditor-General (2013). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Arrangements to Repair Pipes and Roads in Christchurch. Wellington: New Zealand Government. www.oag.govt.nz/2013/scirt/docs/oag-scirt.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Office of the Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery (2011). Canterbury Earthquake Recovery: Proposed Governance Arrangements. New Zealand Government. http://cera.govt.nz/sites/default/files/common/cabinet-paper-1-proposed-governance-arrangements-march-2011.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Olshansky, R.B., Johnson, L.A., & Topping, K.C. (2006). Rebuilding communities following disaster: lessons from Kobe and Los Angeles. Built Environment. 32 (4). pp. 354374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, B., & Peters, C. (2010). Directions in disaster resilience policy. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 25 (3). pp. 811.Google Scholar
Rapp, R.R. (2011). Disaster Recovery Project Management: Bringing order from Chaos. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, R. (2004). Risk and regulation: can improved government action reduce the impacts of natural disasters. Building Research and Information. 32 (5). pp. 391402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinfort, P. (2010). Understanding the Antecedents of Project Management Best Practice: Lessons to be Learned for and from Aid/Relief Projects. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. RMIT, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J., Vargo, J., Seville, E., Kachali, H., McNaughton, A., & Powell, F. (2011). The recovery of Canterbury’s organisations: a comparative analysis of the 4 September 2010, 22 February and 13 June 2011 earthquakes. Resilient Organisations Research Report 2011/04. http://static1.squarespace.com/static/5006875e24ac21f35d8de8d2/t/51624af7e4b01df404d6a91f/1365396215961/The+Recovery+of+Canterbury+Orgs+-+Comparative+Analysis+4+Sept%2C+22+Feb+and+31+June+Eqs.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Taylor, J.E., Chang, S.E., Elwood, K.J., Seville, E., & Brunsdon, D. (2012). Learning from Christchurch: technical decisions and societal consequences in post-earthquake recovery. Resilient Organisations Research Report 2012/08. Christchurch: Resilient Organisations, The University of British Columbia, The University of Canterbury. www.resorgs.org.nz/images/stories/pdfs/critical_decisions_in_the_recovery_of_christchurch.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Wakefield, S. (2012). Christchurch economic recovery plan. Paper presented at The Logistics of Natural Disaster Recovery 2012 International Conference, 5–7 March 2012, Wellington.Google Scholar
Wamsler, C., & Lawson, N. (2011). The role of formal and informal insurance mechanisms for reducing urban disaster risk: a south-north comparison. Housing Studies. 26 (2). pp. 197223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, T. (2011). The Canterbury Earthquake sequence and implications for seismic design levels. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2011/183, July 2011. Wellington: GNS Science. http://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/documents-by-key/2011-09-2349 (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×