Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: August 2012

16 - Reproduction through surrogacy

Summary

Introduction

From its beginnings, surrogacy has been dogged by controversy. Even the terminology has been met with controversy (English et al., 1991). In the United Kingdom arrangements where the surrogate is also the genetic mother of the child have been defined as ‘partial’, ‘straight’ or ‘genetic’ surrogacy, and arrangements where the surrogate is not genetically related to the child have been called ‘full’, ‘host’ or ‘gestational’ surrogacy.

In the United States surrogacy originally described an arrangement in which intended parents attempted conception through the use of a woman’s egg, and that woman underwent inseminations with the intended father’s sperm. In this case the surrogate was providing both the genetics and the gestation. As in vitro fertilization emerged as a viable treatment option, another surrogacy option emerged wherein a couple or individual worked with a woman who would carry a genetically unrelated embryo that was transferred to her. In this scenario the surrogate contributes only the gestation. In 2006 1 per cent of all fresh ART cycles in the United States involved a gestational surrogate (for a total of 1,042 cycles); additional cycles were performed involving donor eggs (CDC, 2006). In the UK the number of surrogate births, although rising, is harder to estimate due to a number of more informal home-insemination arrangements. In this case IVF is not required and so the surrogate birth goes unregistered as such.

References
Andrews, L. B. 1989 Between Strangers: Surrogate Mothers, Expectant Fathers, and Brave New BabiesNew YorkHarper & Row
Andrews, L. B. 1990 Gostin, L.Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and PrivacyIndianapolisIndiana University Press
Brazier, M.Campbell, A.Golombok, S. 1998
Cameron, G. 2011
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCwww.cdc.gov/ART/ART2006/section2c.htm#f40
Ciccarelli, J. C.Beckman, L. J. 2005 Navigating rough waters: an overview of psychological aspects of surrogacyJournal of Social Issues 61 21
Crockin, S. L.JonesJr., H. W. 2010 Legal Conceptions: The Evolving Law and Policy of Assisted Reproductive TechnologiesBaltimoreThe Johns Hopkins University Press
English, M. E.Mechanick-Braverman, A.Corson, S. L. 1991 Semantics and science: the distinction between gestational carrier and traditional surrogacy programsWomen’s Health Issues 1 155
Gamble, N. 2009 Crossing the line: the legal and ethical problems of foreign surrogacyReproductive Biomedicine Online 19 151
Ghevaert, L. 2011 International surrogacy: progress or media hype?BioNews590
Golombok, S.Murray, C.Jadva, V.MacCallum, F. 2004 Families created through surrogacy arrangement: parent-child relationships in the 1st year of lifeDevelopmental Psychology 40 400
Golombok, S.MacCallum, F.Murray, C.Lycett, E. 2006 Surrogacy families: parental functioning, parent-child relationships and children’s psychological development at age 2Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47 213
Golombok, S.Murray, C.Jadva, V.Lycett, E. 2006 Non-genetic and non-gestational parenting: consequences for parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3Human Reproduction 21 1918
Gostin, L. 1990 Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and PrivacyIndianapolisIndiana University Press
Hyder, N. 2010 Couple request surrogate mum to abort over disabilityBionews579
Jadva, J.Murray, CLycett, E.MacCallum, F. 2003 Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate motherHuman Reproduction 18 2196
Jadva, V.Casey, P.Readings, J.Blake, L.Golombok, S. 2011 A longitudinal study of recipients’ views and experiences of intra-family egg donationHuman Reproduction
Jadva, V.Blake, L.Casey, P.Golombok, S. 2012
Karpel, M. 1980 Family secretsFamily Process 19 295
Lycett, E.Daniels, K.Curson, R.Golombok, S. 2005 School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents’ disclosure patternsHuman Reproduction 20 810
MacCallum, F.Lycett, E.Murray, C.Jadva, V. 2003 Surrogacy: the experience of commissioning couplesHuman Reproduction 18 1334
McGee, G.Vaughan-Brakman, S.Gurmankin, A. D. 2001 Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optionalHuman Reproduction 16 2033
Pande, A. 2009 “It may be her eggs but it’s my blood”: surrogates and everyday forms of kinship in IndiaQualitative Sociology 32 379
Ragoné, H. 1994 Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the HeartOxfordWestview Press
Raoul-Duval, A.Letur-Konirsch, H.Frydman, R. 1992 Anonymous oocyte donation: a psychological study of recipients, donors and childrenHuman Reproduction 7 51
Readings, J.Blake, L.Casey, P.Jadva, V. 2011 Secrecy, disclosure, and everything in between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation, and surrogacyReproductive Biomedicine Online 22 485
Spar, D. L. 2006 The Baby Business: How Money, Science and Politics Drive the Commerce of ConceptionBostonHarvard Business School Press
Steinbock, B. 1990 Gostin, L.Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and PrivacyIndianapolisIndiana University Press
Teman, E. 2010 Birthing a MotherBerkleyUniversity of California Press
Tieu, M. M. 2009 Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothersJournal of Medical Ethics 35 171
Triseliotis, J. 1973 In Search of Origins: The Experiences of Adopted PeopleLondon and BostonRoutledge and Kegan Paul
Turner, A. J.Coyle, A. 2000 What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapyHuman Reproduction 15 2041
Van den Akker, O. 2000 The importance of a genetic link in mothers commissioning a surrogate baby in the UKHuman Reproduction 15 1849
Van Zyl, L.van Niekerk, A. 2000 Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhoodJournal of Medical Ethics 26 404
Wallbank, J. 2002 Too many mothers? Surrogacy, kinship and the welfare of the childMedical Law Review 10 271
Warnock, M. 1984 Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and EmbryologyLondonDepartment of Health and Social Security
Legislation
France
Code (Nouveau) de Procedure Civile Français 1977
UK
1990
1990