Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Nelson-Flower, Martha J. Flower, Tom P. and Ridley, Amanda R. 2018. Sex differences in the drivers of reproductive skew in a cooperative breeder. Molecular Ecology, Vol. 27, Issue. 10, p. 2435.

    Tibbetts, Elizabeth A. Fearon, Michelle L. Wong, Ellery Huang, Zachary Y. and Tinghitella, Robin M. 2018. Rapid juvenile hormone downregulation in subordinate wasp queens facilitates stable cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 285, Issue. 1872, p. 20172645.

    Dantzer, Ben Bennett, Nigel C and Clutton-Brock, Tim H 2017. Social conflict and costs of cooperation in meerkats are reflected in measures of stress hormones. Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 1131.

    Cram, Dominic L. Blount, Jonathan D. Young, Andrew J. and Grindstaff, Jennifer 2015. Oxidative status and social dominance in a wild cooperative breeder. Functional Ecology, Vol. 29, Issue. 2, p. 229.

    Sanderson, Jennifer L. Wang, Jinliang Vitikainen, Emma I. K. Cant, Michael A. and Nichols, Hazel J. 2015. Banded mongooses avoid inbreeding when mating with members of the same natal group. Molecular Ecology, Vol. 24, Issue. 14, p. 3738.

    Nelson-Flower, Martha J. and Ridley, Amanda R. 2015. Male-male competition is not costly to dominant males in a cooperatively breeding bird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 69, Issue. 12, p. 1997.

    Dey, Cody J. O'Connor, Constance M. Balshine, Sigal Quinn, James S. and Schoech, Steve 2014. Cooperative males reduce incubation in response to cues of female-female competition. Ibis, Vol. 156, Issue. 2, p. 446.

    Schneider, Tilman C. and Kappeler, Peter M. 2014. Social systems and life-history characteristics of mongooses. Biological Reviews, Vol. 89, Issue. 1, p. 173.

    Harrison, Xavier A. York, Jennifer E. Cram, Dominic L. Hares, Michelle C. and Young, Andrew J. 2013. Complete reproductive skew within white-browed sparrow weaver groups despite outbreeding opportunities for subordinates of both sexes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 67, Issue. 12, p. 1915.

    Clutton-Brock, Tim and Janson, Charles 2012. Primate socioecology at the crossroads: Past, present, and future. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 136.

    Nichols, H. J. Bell, M. B. V. Hodge, S. J. and Cant, M. A. 2012. Resource limitation moderates the adaptive suppression of subordinate breeding in a cooperatively breeding mongoose. Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 635.

    Hodge, Sarah J. Bell, Matthew B.V. Mwanguhya, Francis Kyabulima, Solomon Waldick, Ruth C. and Russell, Andy F. 2009. Maternal weight, offspring competitive ability, and the evolution of communal breeding. Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 20, Issue. 4, p. 729.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: February 2010

15 - Understanding variation in reproductive skew: directions for future empirical research

from Part IV - Future directions
Summary

Summary

Reproductive skew models provide a powerful theoretical tool for understanding the way reproduction is shared in animal societies. However, testing skew models empirically has proved problematic, partly due to the difficulties of ensuring that all the assumptions of the model have been met, and partly because the parameters to be tested often correlate with other factors likely to influence skew.

Two broad sets of processes are likely to act in tandem to influence reproductive skew in societies where dominants and subordinates are equally capable of breeding successfully. First, reproductive skew is likely to be influenced by the extent to which subordinate reproduction is costly to dominant females, as dominants would only be expected to disrupt subordinate breeding attempts if they benefit from doing so. Second, reproductive skew is likely to be influenced by the extent to which dominants are able to disrupt subordinate breeding attempts.

Before testing the predictions of competing skew models, empirical work should investigate the underlying causes of variation in reproductive skew in the species in question. This will involve a detailed investigation of (1) the factors that influence female breeding success that are not a consequence of interference from other parties (such as age, condition, access to unrelated breeding partners); (2) the costs and benefits that dominant and subordinate individuals experience when breeding together; and (3) the tactics that competing parties use to maximize their own breeding success. This should yield insights into the extent to which the observed level of skew is optimal for either competing party, which would provide better knowledge of which party is in control of reproduction and which skew models are applicable.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates
  • Online ISBN: 9780511641954
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511641954
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×