Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought
  • Cited by 25
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
May 2011
Print publication year:
2011
Online ISBN:
9780511976483
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976483
Subjects:
Classical Studies, Classical Literature, Philosophy, Political Philosophy
Information

Book description

Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought develops readings of Rome's three most important Latin historians - Sallust, Livy and Tacitus - in light of contemporary discussions of republicanism and rhetoric. Drawing on recent scholarship as well as other classical writers and later political thinkers, this book develops interpretations of the three historians' writings centering on their treatments of liberty, rhetoric, and social and political conflict. Sallust is interpreted as an antagonistic republican, for whom elite conflict serves as an outlet and channel for the antagonisms of political life. Livy is interpreted as a consensualist republican, for whom character and its observation helps to maintain the body politic. Tacitus is interpreted as being centrally concerned with the development of prudence and as a subtle critic of imperial rule.

Reviews

‘Daniel Kapust’s nuanced exploration of the relationship between rhetoric and deliberation provides a timely contribution not only to the renewed scholarly interest in Roman political thought but also to how we think about our contemporary politics.’

Dean Hammer - John W. Wetzel Professor of Classics and Professor of Government, Franklin and Marshall College

‘Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought is erudite, well written, and original. Daniel Kapust deserves praise for so seriously and systematically presenting the historians of the Roman Republic as political thinkers. Through Kapust’s efforts their ruminations on rhetoric and liberty resonate from their age to our own.’

John P. McCormick - University of Chicago and author of Machiavellian Democracy

‘Daniel Kapust’s masterful and visionary book … traces the vexed relationship between republican liberty and oratorical eloquence in the writings of three major historians of Rome … It is testimony to Kapust’s scholarly skill that, in relatively brief compass, the volume is able to engage in wide historical coverage without sacrificing any depth or profundity. Kapust identifies in his Roman sources a largely unexamined thread in the Western tradition - a compelling alternative to both Aristotelian and liberal accounts of politics - and demonstrates why this strand of thought is important and merits attention … stands alone as a unique contribution to philosophical debate … will … have considerable impact not only on political theorists, but also on the related disciplines of philosophy, classics, and history. Very few scholars are able to straddle the divide between historical research and contemporary theoretical issues as elegantly and insightfully …’

Cary J. Nederman - Texas A&M University

‘Kapust masterfully reads the trinity of Roman historians in the light of Cicero so as to explore the relationship between rhetoric and liberty in each, and in doing so, he identifies major themes across the Roman writers that are echoed in contemporary republican and rhetorical scholarship. The result is a resource for understanding the complexities of liberty, rhetoric, and conflict in political communities. We’ve needed a book like this for a long time.’

Victoria Emma Pagán - University of Florida

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
Bibliography
Abizadeh, Arash. “On the Philosophy/Rhetoric Binaries: Or, Is Habermasian Discourse Motivationally Impotent?” Philosophy and Social Criticism 33, no. 4 (2007): 445–72.
Ad C. Herennium De Ratione Dicendi. Translated by Caplan, Harry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.
Adcock, F.E. Roman Political Ideas and Practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1964.
Allen, Danielle S. Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Arendt, Hannah. Truth and Politics. In The Portable Hannah Arendt, edited by Baehr, Peter. New York: Penguin, 2000: 545–75.
Aristotle, . The “Art” of Rhetoric. Translated by Freese, John Henry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1947.
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Irwin, Terrence. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985.
Aristotle, Politics. Edited by Reeve, C.D.C.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1998.
Aristotle, Rhetoric. Translated by Roberts, W. Rhys. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Vol. II, The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Astin, Alan E. Cato the Censor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Austin, J.L. How to Do Things with Words. Edited by Urmson, J.O. and Sbisa, Marina. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.
Bailyn, Bernard.The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.
Bartsch, Shadi. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.
Batstone, William W. “The Antithesis of Virtue: Sallust's Synkrisis and the Crisis of the Late Republic.” Classical Antiquity 7, no. 1 (1988): 1–29.
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays, edited by Hardy, Henry and Hausheer, Roger. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1997: 191–242.
Boesche, Roger. “The Politics of Pretence: Tacitus and the Political Theory of Despotism.” History of Political Thought VIII, no. 2 (1987): 189–210.
Brink, C.O. “Can Tacitus' Dialogus Be Dated? Evidence and Historical Conclusions.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 96 (1994): 251–80.
Briscoe, J. “The First Decade.” In Livy, edited by Dorey, T.A.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971: 1–20.
Brown, Robert. “Livy's Sabine Women and the Ideal of Concordia.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 125 (1995): 291–319.
Brunt, P.A. “Libertas in the Republic.” In The Fall of the Roman Republic and Other Related Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988: 281–350.
Burke, P. “Tacitism.” In Tacitus, edited by Dorey, T.A.. New York: Basic Books, 1969: 149–71.
Cato, . Les Origines: Fragments. Edited by Chassignet, Martine. Paris: Société d'Édition “Les Belles Lettres,” 1986.
Chaplin, Jane D. Livy's Exemplary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Chrissanthos, Stefan G. “Freedom of Speech and the Roman Republican Army.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, edited by Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004: 341–67.
Brutus, Cicero.. Translated by Hendrickson, G.L., Cicero: Brutus and Orator. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952.
Brutus, Cicero.De Amicitia. Translated by William Armistead Falconer, Cicero: De Senectute, De Amicitia, De Divinatione. London: William Heinemann, 1923.
Brutus, Cicero.De Inventione. Translated by Hubbell, H.M., Cicero: De Inventione, De Optimo Genere Oratorum, Topica. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.
Brutus, Cicero.De Lege Agraria. Translated by Freese, John Henry, Cicero: Pro Publio Quinctio, Pro Sexto Roscio Amerino, Pro Quinto Roscio Comoedo, De Lege Agraria. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Brutus, Cicero.De Legibus. Translated by Keyes, Clinton Walker, Cicero: De Republica and De Legibus. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Brutus, Cicero.De Officiis. Translated by Miller, Walter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.
Brutus, Cicero.De Oratore. Translated by Sutton, E.W.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Brutus, Cicero.De Re Publica: Selections. Edited by Zetzel, James E.G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Brutus, Cicero.De Republica. Translated by Keyes, Clinton Walker, Cicero: De Republica and De Legibus. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Brutus, Cicero.Letters to Atticus. Translated by Bailey, D.R. Shackleton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Brutus, Cicero.Letters to Friends. Translated by Bailey, D.R. Shackleton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Brutus, Cicero.On Duties. Edited by Griffin, M.T. and Atkins, E.M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Brutus, Cicero.On the Commonwealth. Edited by Zetzel, James E.G., On the Commonwealth and on the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Brutus, Cicero.On the Ideal Orator. Translated by May, James M. and Wisse, Jakob. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Brutus, Cicero.Orator. Translated by Hubbell, H.M., Cicero: Brutus and Orator. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952.
Brutus, Cicero.Philippics. Translated by Ker, Walter C.A.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1938.
Brutus, Cicero. Pro. M. Marcello. Translated by N.H. Watts, Cicero: Orations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958.
Brutus, Cicero.Pro Sulla. Translated by C. MacDonald, In Catilinam I–IV, Pro Murena, Pro Sulla, Pro Flacco. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Brutus, Cicero.Tusculan Disputations. Translated by King, J.E.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966.
Coby, J. Patrick. Machiavelli's Romans. Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.
Cohen, Joshua. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge: MIT University Press, 1997: 67–91.
Connolly, Joy. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
Cox, Virginia. “Machiavelli and the Rhetorica Ad Herennium: Deliberative Rhetoric in The Prince.” The Sixteenth Century Journal XXVIII, no. 4 (1997): 1109–41.
Dahl, Robert A. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Damon, Cynthia. “Rhetoric and Historiography.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, edited by Dominik, William J. and Hall, Jon. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007: 439–50.
Damon, CynthiaThe Digest of Justinian. Edited by Mommsen, Theodor, Krueger, Paul, and Watson, Alan. Vol. I. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985.
Dominik, William J. “Tacitus and Pliny on Oratory.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, edited by Dominik, William J. and Hall, Jon. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007: 323–38.
Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1957.
Dyck, Andrew R. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.
Earl, D.C. The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.
Earl, D.C “Prologue-Form in Ancient Historiography.” Austfieg und Niedergang der Romischen Welt: Geschichte und Kultur Roms im Spiegel der Neueren Forschung 1, no. 2 (1972): 842–56.
Eckstein, Arthur M. Moral Vision in the Histories of Polybius. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
Eder, Walter. “Augustus and the Power of Tradition: The Augustan Principate as Binding Link between Republic and Empire.” In Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, edited by Raaflaub, Kurt A. and Toher, Mark. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990: 71–122.
Edwards, Catharine. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Elster, Jon. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Foundations of Social Choice Theory, edited by Elster, Jon and Hylland, Aanund. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 103–32.
Fantham, Elaine. “The Contexts and Occasions of Roman Public Rhetoric.” In Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, edited by Dominik, William J. London: Routledge, 1997: 111–28.
Fantham, Elaine “Imitation and Decline: Rhetorical Theory and Practice in the First Century after Christ.” Classical Philology 73, no. 2 (1978): 102–16.
Fantham, ElaineThe Roman World of Cicero's De Oratore. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Fontana, Benedetto. “Sallust and the Politics of Machiavelli.” History of Political Thought XXIV, no. 1 (2003): 86–108.
Fontana, Benedetto “Tacitus on Empire and Republic.” History of Political Thought XIV (1993): 27–40.
Fontana, Benedetto, Nederman, Cary J.., and Gary, Remer. “Introduction: Deliberative Democracy and the Rhetorical Turn.” In Talking Democracy: Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy, edited by Fontana, Benedetto, Nederman, Cary J., and Remer, Gary. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004: 1–25.
Furhmann, Manfred. Cicero and the Roman Republic. Translated by Yuill, W.E.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1992.
Galinsky, Karl. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Garsten, Bryan. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Garver, Eugene. Aristotle's Rhetoric: An Art of Character. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Goldberg, Sander M. “Appreciating Aper: The Defense of Modernity in Tacitus' Dialogus De Oratoribus.” Classical Quarterly 49, no. 1 (1999): 224–37.
Gowing, Alain. Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Griffin, Miriam T. “Seneca and Pliny.” In The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, edited by Rowe, Christopher and Schofield, Malcolm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 532–58.
Griffin, MiriamSeneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
Gruen, Erich S. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Gruen, ErichThe Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.
Habermas, Jürgen. “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy 92, no. 3 (1995): 109–31.
Habermas, JürgenThe Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon Press, 1981.
Habermas, Jürgen “Three Normative Models of Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996: 21–30.
Hamilton, Alexander. Federalist 1. In The Federalist Papers, edited by Rossiter, Clinton. New York: The New American Library of World Literature, 1961.
Hammer, Dean. Roman Political Thought and the Modern Theoretical Imagination. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2008.
Hardie, Alex. Statius and the Silvae: Poets, Patrons and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World. Liverpool: Francis Cairns, 1983.
Hartz, Louis. The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1955.
Hellegouarc'h, J. Le Vocabulaire Latin Des Relations Et Des Partis Politiques Sous La Republique. Paris: Société d'Édition “Les Belles Lettres,” 1972.
Herodotus, . The Histories. Translated by Selincourt, Aubrey. New York: Penguin, 1996.
Hobbes, Thomas. The Citizen. Edited by Gert, Bernard, Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive). Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991.
Hobbes, ThomasLeviathan. Edited by Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Hobbes, ThomasOf the Life and History of Thucydides. Edited by David Grene, The Peloponnesian War: The Complete Hobbes Translation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Hölkeskamp, K.J. “The Roman Republic: Government of the People, by the People, for the People?” Scripta Classica Israelica 19 (2000): 203–33.
Homer, . The Iliad. Translated by Lattimore, Richard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.
Honohan, Iseult. Civic Republicanism. London: Routledge, 2002.
Hornblower, Simon. A Commentary on Thucydides. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Hornqvist, Mikael. Machiavelli and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Isocrates. Areopagiticus. Translated by George Norlin, Isocrates II. New York: William Heinemann, 1929.
Isocrates, On the Peace. Translated by George Norlin, Isocrates II. London: William Heinemann, 1929.
Javitch, Daniel. Poetry and Courtliness in Renaissance England. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.
Kahn, Victoria. Rhetoric, Prudence, and Skepticism in the Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgement. Translated by Meredith, James Creed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.
Kapust, Daniel J.“Cato's Virtues and The Prince: Reading Sallust's War with Catiline with Machiavelli's The Prince,” History of Political Thought 28, no. 3 (2007): 433–448.
Kapust, Daniel J. “Between Contumacy and Obsequiousness:Tacitus on Moral Freedom and the Historian's Task.” European Journal of Political Theory 8, no. 3 (2009): 293–311.
Kapust, Daniel J “On the Ancient Uses of Political Fear and Its Modern Implications.” Journal of the History of Ideas 69, no. 3 (2008): 353–73.
Kennedy, George A. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
Kennedy, George AThe Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C.–A.D. 300. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.
Konstan, David. “Clemency as a Virtue.” Classical Philology 100 (2005): 337–46.
Kraus, C.S., and Woodman, A.J.. Latin Historians. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Leeman, Anton D., Harm, Pinkster, and Wisse, Jakob. M. Tullius Cicero, De Oratore Libri III: Kommentar. Vol. 4. Heidelberg: C. Winter, 1981.
Levene, D.S. “Sallust's Jugurtha: An ‘Historical Fragment.’” The Journal of Roman Studies 82 (1992): 53–70.
Levene, D.S “Sallust's Catiline and Cato the Censor.” The Classical Quarterly 50, no. 1 (2000): 170–91.
Liebeschuetz, W. “The Theme of Liberty in the Agricola of Tacitus.” The Classical Quarterly 16, no. 1 (1966): 126–39.
Lintott, Andrew. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Lintott, Andrew “The Crisis of the Republic: Sources and Source-Problems.” In The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume IX: The Last Age of the Roman Republic, 146–43 B.C., edited by Crook, J.A., Lintott, Andrew, and Rawson, Elizabeth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 1–15.
Livy, . From the Founding of the City. Translated by Foster, B.O.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1922.
Long, A. A. Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
Long, A.A., and Sedley, D.N.. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Lucan, . The Civil War. Translated by Duff, J.D.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Luce, T.J. “Ancient Views on the Causes of Bias in Historical Writing.” Classical Philology 84, no. 1 (1989): 16–31.
Luce, T.JLivy: The Composition of His History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.
Lucretius, . De Rerum Natura. Translated by Rouse, W.H.D.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Discourses on Livy. Edited by Crick, Bernard. New York: Penguin, 1983.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1984.
Madison, James. Federalist 10. In The Federalist, or the New Constitution, edited by Beloff, Max. London: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15, no. 3 (1987): 338–68.
Markovits, Elizabeth. The Politics of Sincerity: Plato, Frank Speech, and Democratic Judgment. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.
Mason, Sheila M. “Livy and Montesquieu.” In Livy, edited by Dorey, T.A.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971: 118–158.
May, James M. “Cicero as Rhetorician.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, edited by Dominik, William J. and Hall, Jon. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007: 250–63.
McCormick, John P. “Machiavelli against Republicanism: On the Cambridge School's ‘Guicciardinian’ Moments.” Political Theory 31, no. 5 (2003): 615–43.
McCormick, John P “Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism.” American Political Science Review 95, no. 2 (2001): 297–313.
McGushin, P. Bellum Catilinae: A Commentary. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1977.
Miles, Gary B. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.
Millar, Fergus. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.
Momigliano, Arnaldo. “Camillus and Concord.” The Classical Quarterly 36, no. 3/4 (1942): 111–20.
Mommsen, Theodor. History of Rome. Translated by Dickinson, William Purdie. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons 1911.
Morford, Mark. The Roman Philosophers from the Time of Cato the Censor to the Death of Marcus Aurelius. London: Routledge, 2002.
Morstein-Marx, Robert. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Mouritsen, Henrik. Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Mulhall, Stephen, and Swift, Adam, eds. Liberals and Communitarians. Blackwell: Oxford, 1996.
Murphy, Cullen. Are We Rome? The Fall of an Empire and the Fate of America. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2007.
Narducci, Emanuele. “Brutus: The History of Roman Eloquence.” In Brill's Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, edited by May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002: 401–25.
Nederman, Cary J. “The Mirror Crack'd: The Speculum Principum as Political and Social Criticism in the Late Middle Ages.” The European Legacy 3, no. 3 (1998): 18–39.
Nederman, Cary J “Rhetoric, Reason, and Republic: Republicanisms – Ancient, Medieval, and Modern.” In Renaissance Civic Humanism: Reappraisals and Reflections, edited by Hankins, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 247–69.
Nelson, Eric. The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Ogilvie, R.M. A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.
Pettit, PhilipOratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Libera Rei Publicae. Edited by Malcovati, Henrica. Milan: Aug. Taurinorum, 1955.
Pagán, Victoria E. “Distant Voices of Freedom in the Annales of Tacitus.” Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, Collection Latomus X (2000): 358–69.
Petronius, . Satyrica. Translated by Branham, R. Bracht and Kinney, Daniel. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
Pettit, Philip. “Discourse Theory and Republican Freedom.” In Republicanism: History, Theory and Practice, edited by Weinstock, Daniel and Nadeau, Christian. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 2004: 62–82.
Pettit, Philip “The Freedom of the City: A Republican Ideal.” In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, edited by Hamlin, Alan and Pettit, Philip. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989: 141–67.
Pettit, Philip “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple: On a Difference with Quentin Skinner.” Political Theory 30, no. 3 (2002): 339–56.
Pettit, PhilipRepublicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Pettit, Philip “Reworking Sandel's Republicanism.” In Debating Democracy's Discontent: Essays on American Politics, Law and Public Philosophy, edited by Allen, Anita L. and Regan, Milton C., Jr. New York: Oxford, 1998: 40–59.
Pettit, PhilipA Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Plato, . Apology. Translated by Grube, G.M.A.. Edited by Cooper, John M., Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hacket, 1997.
Plato, Gorgias. Translated by Zeyl, Donald J.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.
Plato, Phaedrus. Translated by Rowe, Christopher. Warminster: Aris and Phillips, 1986.
Plato, Republic. Translated by Reeve, C.D.C.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2004.
Pliny, . Letters. Translated by Betty Radice, Pliny: Letters and Panegyricus I, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.
Pliny, Panegyricus. Translated by Betty Radice, Pliny: Letters and Panegyricus II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.
Plutarch, . Life of the Younger. Translated by Perrin, Bernadotte, Plutarch's Lives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.
Plutarch, Life of Cicero. Translated by Perrin, Bernadotte, Plutarch's Lives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.
Plutarch, Life of Marcus Cato. Translated by Perrin, Bernadotte, Plutarch's Lives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.
Plutarch, Life of Pericles. Translated by Perrin, Bernadotte, Plutarch's Lives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.
Pocock, J.G.A. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.
Polybius, . The Histories. Translated by Paton, W.R.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1929.
Quintilian, . Institutio Oratoria. Translated by Butler, H.E.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963.
Raaflaub, Kurt A. “Aristocracy and Freedom of Speech in the Greco-Roman World.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, edited by Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004: 41–61.
Raaflaub, Kurt AThe Discovery of Freedom in Ancient Greece. Translated by Franciscono, Renate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
Raaflaub, Kurt A “From Protection and Defense to Offence and Participation: Stages in the Conflict of the Orders.” In Social Struggles in Archaic Rome, edited by Raaflaub, Kurt A.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986: 198–243.
Raaflaub, Kurt A “The Conflict of the Orders in Archaic Rome: A Comprehensive and Comparative Approach.” In Social Struggles in Archaic Rome, edited by Raaflaub, Kurt A.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986: 1–51.
Rawson, Elizabeth. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. London: Duckworth, 1985.
Rawson, ElizabethThe Spartan Tradition in European Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.
Remer, Gary. “Hobbes, the Rhetorical Tradition, and Toleration.” The Review of Politics 54, no. 1 (1992): 5–33.
Remer, Gary “Humanism, Liberalism, & the Skeptical Case for Religious Toleration.” Polity 25, no. 1 (1992): 21–43.
Remer, Gary “The Classical Orator as Political Representative: Cicero and the Modern Concept of Representation.” Journal of Politics 72, no. 4 (2010):1063–82.
Riley, Patrick. “Rousseau's General Will: Freedom of a Particular Kind.” Political Studies XXXIX, no. 1 (1991): 55–74.
Robbins, Caroline. The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959.
Robin, Corey. Fear: The History of a Political Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Rodgers, Daniel T. “Republicanism: The Career of a Concept.” The Journal of American History 79, no. 1 (1992): 11–38.
Romilly, Jacqueline. “Eunoia in Isocrates or the Political Importance of Creating Good Will.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 78 (1958): 92–101.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Of the Social Contract. Edited by Gourevitch, Victor, Rousseau: The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Rutledge, Steven. Imperial Inquisitions: Prosecutors and Informants from Tiberius to Domitian. New York: Routledge, 2001.
Rutledge, Steven “Oratory and Politics in the Empire.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, edited by Dominik, William J. and Hall, Jon. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007: 109–21.
Sallust, . The Histories. Translated by McGushin, P.. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
Sallust, War with Catiline. Translated by J.C. Rolfe, Sallust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Sallust, War with Jugurtha. Translated by Rolfe, J.C., Sallust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Sallustius, . Historiarum Reliquiae. Edited by Maurenbrecher, Bertoldus. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1967.
Saxonhouse, Arlene W. “Tacitus' Dialogue on Oratory: Political Activity under a Tyrant.” Political Theory 3, no. 1 (1975): 53–68.
Scanlon, Thomas F. The Influence of Thucydides on Sallust. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1980.
Schofield, Malcolm. “Cicero's Definition of Res Publica.” In Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, edited by Powell, J.G.F.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995): 63–83.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1950.
Seager, Robin. Tiberius. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
Seneca, . On Favors. Edited by Cooper, John M. and Procope, J.F., Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Seneca, On Mercy. Edited by Cooper, John M. and Procope, J.F., Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Sinclair, Patrick. Tacitus the Sententious Historian: A Sociology of Rhetoric in Annales 1–6. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
Skinner, Quentin. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Skinner, Quentin “The Italian City-Republics.” In Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 508 B.C. to A.D. 1993, edited by Dunn, John. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992: 57–69.
Skinner, QuentinLiberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Skinner, Quentin “Machiavelli's Discorsi and the Pre-Humanist Origins of Republican Ideas.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, edited by Bock, Gisella, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 121–41.
Skinner, Quentin “On Justice, the Common Good and the Priority of Liberty.” In Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, edited by Mouffe, Chantal. London: Verso, 1992: 211–24.
Skinner, QuentinReason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Skinner, Quentin “The Republican Ideal of Political Liberty.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, edited by Bock, Gisella, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 293–309.
Southern, Pat. Domitian: Tragic Tyrant. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.
Steel, Catherine. Roman Oratory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Suetonius, , Domitian. Translated by J.C. Rolfe, Vol. 11 Suetonius. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Syme, Ronald. “Livy and Augustus.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 64 (1959): 27–87.
Syme, RonaldThe Roman Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1939.
Syme, RonaldSallust. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964.
Syme, RonaldTacitus. Vol. 1 and 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958.
Tacitus, . Agricola. Translated by Hutton, M. and Peterson, W., Tacitus: Dialogus, Agricola, Germanicus. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963.
Tacitus, The Annals. Translated by Jackson, John, Tacitus: The Histories and the Annals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.
Tacitus, De Vita Agricolae. Edited by Ogilvie, R.M. and Richmond, Ian. London: Oxford University Press, 1967.
Tacitus, A Dialogue on Oratory. Translated by Peterson, W. and Winterbottom, M., Tacitus: Dialogus, Agricola, Germania. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958.
Tacitus, Dialogus De Oratoribus. Edited by Mayer, Roland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Tacitus, The Histories. Translated by Moore, Clifford H.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1925.
Thucydides, . History of the Peloponnesian War. Translated by Warner, Rex. New York: Penguin, 1972.
Thucydidis, . Historiae. Edited by Jones, Henry Stuart. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955.
Trenchard, John. Cato's Letters; or, Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and Other Important Subjects. Vol. 1. New York: Russell and Russell, 1969.
Vasaly, Ann. “Personality and Power: Livy's Depiction of the Appii Claudii in the First Pentad.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 117, no. 1987 (1987): 203–26.
Viroli, Maurizio. Republicanism. Translated by Shugaar, Antony. New York: Hill and Wang, 2002.
Walker, William. “Sallust and Skinner on Civil Liberty.” European Journal of Political Theory 5, no. 3 (2006): 237–59.
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. “Civilis Princeps: Between Citizen and King.” The Journal of Roman Studies 72 (1982): 32–48.
Walsh, P.G. Livy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.
Walsh, P.GLivy: His Historical Aims and Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.
Ward, Allen M. “How Democratic Was the Roman Republic?” New England Classical Journal 31, no. 2 (2004): 101–19.
Weinstock, Stefan. Divus Julius. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.
Weithman, Paul. “Political Republicanism and Perfectionist Republicanism.” Review of Politics 66, no. 2 (2004): 285–312.
Whidden, Christopher. “Cyrus's Imperial Household: An Aristotelian Reading of Xenophon's Cyropaedia.” Polis 25, no. 1 (2008): 31–62.
Whitfield, J.H. “Machiavelli's Use of Livy.” In Livy, edited by Dorey, T.A.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971: 73–96.
Wiedemann, Thomas. “Reflections of Roman Political Thought in Latin Historical Writing.” In The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, edited by Rowe, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 517–31.
Williams, Gordon. Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
Winterbottom, M. “Quintilian and the Vir Bonus.” The Journal of Roman Studies 54 (1964): 90–7.
Winton, Richard. “Herodotus, Thucydides and the Sophists.” In The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, edited by Rowe, Christopher and Schofield, Malcolm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 89–121.
Wirszubksi, Chaim. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950.
Wisse, Jakob. “De Oratore: Rhetoric, Philosophy, and the Making of the Ideal Orator.” In Brill's Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, edited by May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002: 375–400.
Wood, Gordon S. The Creation of the American Republic 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1969.
Wood, Neal. “Sallust's Theorem: A Comment on ‘Fear’ in Western Political Thought.” History of Political Thought XVI, no. 2 (1995): 174–89.
Woodman, A.J. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography. London: Croom Helm, 1988.
Yack, Bernard. “Rhetoric and Public Reasoning: An Aristotelian Understanding of Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 34, no. 4 (2006): 417–38.
Yavetz, Zvi. “The Res Gestae and Augustus' Public Image.” In Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects, edited by Millar, Fergus and Segal, Erich. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984: 1–36.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.