Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Braun, Kathrin Herrmann, Svea Luise Könninger, Sabine and Moore, Alfred 2010. Ethical Reflection Must Always be Measured. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 35, Issue. 6, p. 839.

    Braun, Kathrin Moore, Alfred Herrmann, Svea Luise and Könninger, Sabine 2010. Science governance and the politics of proper talk: governmental bioethics as a new technology of reflexive government. Economy and Society, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 510.

    Nishizawa, Mariko and Renn, Ortwin 2006. Responding Public Demand for Assurance of Genetically Modified Crops: Case from Japan. Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 41.

    Brown, Nik Faulkner, Alex Kent, Julie and Michael, Mike 2006. Regulating Hybrids: ‘Making a Mess’ and ‘Cleaning Up’ in Tissue Engineering and Transpecies Transplantation. Social Theory & Health, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    PETERSEN, ALAN 2002. Replicating Our Bodies, Losing Our Selves: News Media Portrayals of Human Cloning in the Wake of Dolly. Body & Society, Vol. 8, Issue. 4, p. 71.

    Welsh, Ian and Evans, Robert 1999. Xenotransplantation, risk, regulation and surveillance: social and technological dimensions of change. New Genetics and Society, Vol. 18, Issue. 2-3, p. 197.

    Welsh, Ian 1999. Global Futures. p. 47.

    Welsh, Ian 1996. Risk, global governance and environmental politics. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 407.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1995
  • Online publication date: July 2010

14 - In the engine of industry: regulators of biotechnology, 1970–86

Summary

Regulators' attempts to balance conflicting interests and to convert the public's and politicians' feelings about technology into coherent action have fascinated students of industrial policy (Rothwell & Zegveld 1981; Grant 1989). By contrast historians, though in principle sharing such interests, have tended to treat regulators either as external brakes or as lubricants in processes controlled more directly by market forces and technological logic. Thus historians' interest in the chemical industry which gave rise to studies of companies and processes has not engendered a corresponding corpus of works on such regulatory bodies as the FDA or Britain's Alkali Inspectorate (see the still unmatched study of DuPont: Hounshell & Smith 1988). Now, however, with a new interest in technological systems, we are acquiring a few historical case-studies from modern industrial society in which regulators have themselves been considered central parts of the process, acting, so to speak, as components of the engine itself.

In particular, historians are now investigating policies which, since the 1930s, and latterly during the Cold War, encouraged the development of such state sponsored technologies as synthetic rubber, computing and semiconductors used by the space and military industries. The support of such academic categories as scientific instruments and cancer research is also being elucidated. Rarely, nonetheless, is regulation yet seen as a whole: promoters of new technology have still been conceptually divorced from those responsible for its constraint and from those responsible for the protection of the public and of workers.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Resistance to New Technology
  • Online ISBN: 9780511563706
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511563706
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×