Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Dekker, Erwin and de Jong, Marielle 2018. What Do Book Awards Signal? An Analysis of Book Awards in Three Countries. Empirical Studies of the Arts, Vol. 36, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Koren, Timo and Delhaye, Christine 2017. Depoliticising literature, politicising diversity: ethno-racial boundaries in Dutch literary professionals’ aesthetic repertoires. Identities, p. 1.

    Verboord, Marc Kuipers, Giselinde and Janssen, Susanne 2015. Institutional Recognition in the Transnational Literary Field, 1955–2005. Cultural Sociology, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 447.

    Katz, Ruth and Katz, Elihu 2015. Evaluating culture: World music and fusion food. International Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 155.

    Kozica, Arjan Kaiser, Stephan and Friesl, Martin 2014. Organizational Routines: Conventions as a Source of Change and Stability. Schmalenbach Business Review, Vol. 66, Issue. 3, p. 334.

    Verboord, Marc 2012. Female bestsellers: A cross-national study of gender inequality and the popular–highbrow culture divide in fiction book production, 1960–2009. European Journal of Communication, Vol. 27, Issue. 4, p. 395.

    van Venrooij, Alex 2011. Classifying Popular Music in the United States and the Netherlands. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 55, Issue. 5, p. 609.

    van Venrooij, Alex and Schmutz, Vaughn 2010. The Evaluation of Popular Music in the United States, Germany and the Netherlands: A Comparison of the Use of High Art and Popular Aesthetic Criteria. Cultural Sociology, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 395.

    Wirtén, Eva Hemmungs 2008. A Companion to the History of the Book. p. 395.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2000
  • Online publication date: March 2010

5 - Culture or commerce? Symbolic boundaries in French and American book publishing

Summary

Book publishing is a particularly fertile ground for the comparative study of how people construct and use classification schemes in their evaluation processes. The main activities of book publishing revolve around a core set of decisions which are firmly rooted in underlying assessments of worth about what to publish and why. Moreover, the sector as a whole and its inhabitants are the focus of debates over the status of books in an age of multimedia, global information technologies, industry consolidation, and shifting cultural hierarchies among large segments of the reading public. Publishing professionals are presently confronted with unprecedented opportunities and threats, their positions and role-expectations are changing, and their daily tasks and responsibilities are in flux. The contemporary transformation of book publishing creates an unstable terrain of new conflicts and compromises which are inextricably bound to the edification and defense of symbolic territories and boundaries.

This study examines the book publishing communities in France and the United States in order to understand how publishers evaluate and classify the realm of literature and ideas. In general, I will identify the criteria used to construct symbolic boundaries, that is, the lines publishers sketch when they categorize literary and intellectual work. A primary focus of the research is on the rhetorical language used to define “worthy” and “less worthy” books, authors, genres, and contemporary cultural tendencies. A secondary goal is to clarify the criteria mobilized by publishers to characterize professional peers and perceived readers of different kinds of books.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology
  • Online ISBN: 9780511628108
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628108
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×