Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T21:30:40.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Contractures and Contradictions: Medical Necessity and the Injured Brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Joseph J. Fins
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Tribal Counsels

Maggie left Worcester Hospital for Spaulding, a leading rehabilitation center in Boston, on May 17, 2006. The good news was that Spaulding offered her three hours of therapy each day, five days a week. Even better, it was paid for. But it did not start off that way.

Maggie was covered by her father's health insurance plan, which he had through his work for a tribal casino in Connecticut. The problem with the move to Boston was that Spaulding was out of state and out of Paul's insurance network. This is not an uncommon problem for people seeking rehabilitation for brain injury, whose options are often limited by geography, either because of limits within private networks or by state-based Medicare plans.

Maggie's challenge was that the care that her family wanted her to receive was from an out-of-network provider. But unlike most cases in which an appeal would be presented to an insurance company, Paul took her case to the tribal counsel and they made an individual decision in favor of providing for her initial rehabilitation at Spaulding. Nancy was not sure why the tribe decided this way but speculated that it may have been “… because Paul had friends in the Indian community, or maybe they decided because it was a disability and they were compassionate.”

Either way, I found their deliberations interesting. Maggie was not an abstract case from an unknown family, but the daughter of a friend and a colleague who needed help, who needed a hand. It was a communitarian response of mutual support in which each member of that counsel could personally imagine the ordeal that this one family was facing and how they collectively might temper that burden. The counsel's proximity to the people involved in the case, who would be affected by their decision, brought both integrity and compassion to the deliberations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Rights Come to Mind
Brain Injury, Ethics, and the Struggle for Consciousness
, pp. 134 - 164
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×