Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People, Vol. III: The Civil Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Albiston, Catherine R. “Bargaining in the Shadow of Social Institutions: Competing Discourses and Social Change in Workplace Mobilization of Civil Rights.” Law & Society Review 39 (2005): 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albiston, Catherine R. Institutional Inequality and the Mobilization of the Family and Medical Leave Act: Rights on Leave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Albiston, Catherine R., and Nielsen, Laura Beth. “Funding the Cause: How Public Law Organizations Fund Their Activities and Why It Matters for Social Change.” Law and Social Inquiry 39(2014): 62–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albiston, Catherine R. and Sandefur, Rebecca L.. “Expanding the Empirical Study of Access to Justice.” Wisconsin Law Review (2013): 101–120.Google Scholar

Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Anthony, Robert A. “Interpretive Rules, Policy Statements, Manuals and the Like–Should Federal Agencies Use Them to Bind the Public.” Duke Law Journal 41 (1992): 1311–1384.Google Scholar

Ayres, Ian, and Braithwaite, John. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagenstos, Samuel R. “The Structural Turn and the Limits of Antidiscrimination Law.” California Law Review 94 (2006): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagenstos, Samuel R. Law and the Contradictions of the Disability Rights Movement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bagenstos, Samuel R. “Formalism and Employer Liability under Title VII.” University of Chicago Legal Forum (2014): 145–176.Google Scholar

Baker, Carrie N. The Women’s Movement Against Sexual Harassment. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Banaszak, Lee Ann. The Women’s Movement Inside and Outside the State. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Barber, Michael J., and McCarty, Nolan. “The Causes and Consequences of Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, edited by Persily, Nathaniel, 15–58. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bardach, Eugene, and Kagan, Robert A.. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jeb. “Bankrupt Bargain-Bankruptcy Reform and the Politics of Adversarial Legalism.” Journal of Law and Politics 13 (1997): 893–935.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jeb. Overruled: Legislative Overrides, Pluralism, and Contemporary Court-Congress Relations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jeb, and Burke, Thomas F.. “The Diffusion of Rights: From Law on the Books to Organizational Rights Practices.” Law & Society Review 40 (2006): 493–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Jeb, and Burke, Thomas F.. “Making Way: Legal Mobilization, Organizational Response, and Wheelchair Access.” Law & Society Review 46 (2012): 167–198.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jeb, and Burke, Thomas F.. How Policy Shapes Politics: Rights, Courts, Litigation and the Struggle over Injury Compensation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bass, Jack. Taming the Storm: The Life and Times of Judge Frank M. Johnson, Jr., and the South’s Fight Over Civil Rights. New York: Doubleday, 1993.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye. “Suing Solely to Extract a Settlement Offer.” Journal of Legal Studies 17 (1988): 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiner, Theresa M. Gender Myths v. Working Realities: Using Social Science to Reformulate Sexual Harassment Law. New York: New York University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Best, Rachel Kahn, Edelman, Lauren B., Krieger, Linda Hamilton, and Eliason, Scott R.. “Multiple Disadvantages: An Empirical Test of Intersectionality Theory in EEO Litigation.” Law & Society Review 45 (2011): 991–1025.Google Scholar

Bell, Derrick A. “Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation.” Yale Law Journal 85 (1976): 470–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belton, Robert. “A Comparative Review of Public and Private Enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” Vanderbilt Law Review 31 (1978): 905–962.Google Scholar

Belton, Robert. “The Unfinished Agenda of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.” Rutgers Law Review 45 (1993): 921–964.Google Scholar

Belton, Robert. “Title VII at Forty: A Brief Look at the Birth, Death, and Resurrection of the Disparate Impact Theory of Discrimination.” Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal 22 (2005): 431–472.Google Scholar

Belton, Robert. The Crusade for Equality in the Workplace: The Griggs v. Duke Power Story. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2014.Google Scholar

Berrey, Ellen, Nelson, Robert L., and Nielsen, Laura Beth. Rights on Trial: How Workplace Discrimination Law Perpetuates Inequality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Berry, Jeffrey M. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, D.C.: Brookings University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Besharov, Douglas J. Legal Services for the Poor: Time for Reform. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1990.Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah. “The Dysfunctional Congress.” Annual Review of Political Science 18 (2015): 85–101.Google Scholar

Blasi, Vincent, ed. The Burger Court: The Counter-Revolution that Wasn’t. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Blumrosen, Alfred W. “Administrative Creativity: The First Year of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.” George Washington Law Review 38 (1970): 694–751.Google Scholar

Bodie, Matthew T. “The Roberts Court and the Law of Human Resources.” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 34 (2013): 159–217.Google Scholar

Boehm, Kenneth F. “The Legal Services Program: Unaccountable, Political, Anti-Poor, Beyond Reform, and Unnecessary.” St. Louis University Public Law Review 17 (1998): 321–368.Google Scholar

Bolick, Clint. David’s Hammer: The Case for an Activist Judiciary. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 1997.Google Scholar

Bonastia, Christopher. “Why Did Affirmative Action in Housing Fail During the Nixon Era? Exploring the ‘Institutional Homes’ of Social Policies.” Social Problems 47 (2000): 523–542.Google Scholar

Bonastia, Christopher. Knocking on the Door: The Federal Government’s Attempt to Desegregate the Suburbs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Bonica, Adam. “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2013): 294–311.Google Scholar

Bornstein, Stephanie. “Rights in Recession: Toward Administrative Antidiscrimination Law.” Yale Law & Policy Review 33 (2014): 120–173.Google Scholar

Bourne, Jenny. “‘A Stone of Hope’: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Its Impact on the Economic Status of Black Americans.” Louisiana Law Review 74 (2014): 1195–1225.Google Scholar

Boushey, Heather. Finding Time: The Economics of Work-Life Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Boxenbaum, Eva, and Jonsson, Stefan. “Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Greenwood, Royston, Oliver, Christine, and Suddaby, Roy, 78–98. London: Sage Publications, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, Christina L. “Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (2016): 788–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, Christina L., Epstein, Lee, and Martin, Andrew D.. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2010): 389–411.Google Scholar

Brake, Deborah L. “Retaliation.” Minnesota Law Review 90 (2005): 18–105.Google Scholar

Brake, Deborah L. “Retaliation in an EEO World.” Indiana Law Journal 89 (2014): 115–169.Google Scholar

Brake, Deborah L., and Grossman, Joanna L.. “The Failure of Title VII as a Rights-Claiming System.” North Carolina Law Review 86 (2008): 859–935.Google Scholar

Brandwein, Pamela. Rethinking the Judicial Settlement of Reconstruction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broockman, David E. “The ‘Problem of Preferences’: Medicare and Business Support for the Welfare State.” Studies in American Political Development 26 (2012): 83–106.Google Scholar

Brownell, Emery A. Legal Aid in the United States. Rochester, NY: Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Company, 1951.Google Scholar

Bucy, Pamela H. “Private Justice.” Southern California Law Review 76 (2002): 1–160.Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles S., and Gaddie, Ronald Keith. The Triumph of Voting Rights in the South. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bumiller, Kristin. “Victims in the Shadow of the Law: A Critique of the Model of Legal Protection.” Signs 12 (1987): 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bumiller, Kristin. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Burbank, Steven B., Farhang, Sean, and Kritzer, Herbert M.. “Private Enforcement.” Lewis & Clark Law Review 17 (2013) 637–722.Google Scholar

Burbank, Stephen B. and Farhang, Sean. “The Subterranean Counterrevolution: The Supreme Court, Media, and Litigation Reform.” DePaul Law Review 65 (2016): 293–321.Google Scholar

Burbank, Stephen B. and Farhang, Sean. Rights and Retrenchment: The Counterrevolution against Federal Litigation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Burke, Thomas F. “On the Rights Track: The Americans with Disabilities Act.” In Comparative Disadvantages? Social Regulations and the Global Economy, edited by Nivola, Petro S., 242–318. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Burke, Thomas F. “The Rights Revolution Continues: Why New Rights Are Born (And Old Rights Rarely Die).” Connecticut Law Review 33 (2001): 1259–1271.Google Scholar

Burke, Thomas F. Lawyers, Lawsuits, and Legal Rights: The Battle Over Litigation in American Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Byrne, Anne D. “School District Liability Under Title IX for Sexual Abuse by a Teacher: Why Has the Supreme Court Allowed Schools to Put their Heads in the Sand?” Hamline Law Review 22 (1999): 587–632.Google Scholar

Cahn, Edgar S., and Cahn, Jean C.. “The War on Poverty: A Civilian Perspective.” Yale Law Journal 73 (1964): 1317–1352.Google Scholar

Carp, Robert A., Manning, Kenneth L., and Stidham, Ronald. “A First Term Assessment: The Ideology of Barack Obama’s District Court Appointees.” Judicature 97(2013): 128–136.Google Scholar

Carpenter, Daniel, and Moss, David A., eds. Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Cecil, Joe S., Cort, George W., Williams, Margaret S., and Bataillon, Jared J., eds. Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim after Iqbal: Report to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center, 2011. www.uscourts.gov/file/17889/downloadGoogle Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin. The Conservative Assault on the Constitution. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2011.Google Scholar

Chen, Anthony S. The Fifth Freedom: Jobs, Politics, and Civil Rights in the United States, 1941–1972. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Chen, Alan K., and Cummings, Scott L.. Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2013.Google Scholar

Chin, Gabriel J., and Villazor, Rose Cuison. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965: Legislative a New America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Chen, Ming H. “Regulatory Rights: Civil Rights Agencies Translating “National Origin Discrimination” into Language Rights, 1965–1979.” PhD diss., University of California Berkeley, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Ming H. “Governing by Guidance: Civil Rights Agencies and the Emergence of Language Rights.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 49 (2014): 291–342.Google Scholar

Cherner-Ranft, Meghan E. “The Empty Promise of Title IX: Why Girls Need Courts to Reconsider Liability Standards and Preemption in School Sexual Harassment Cases.” Northwestern University Law Review 97 (2003): 1891–1926.Google Scholar

Chew, Pat K. “Arbitral and Judicial Proceedings: Indistinguishable Justice or Justice Denied.” Wake Forest Law Review 46 (2011): 185–208.Google Scholar

Choi, Stephen J. “Do the Merits Matter Less After the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act?” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23 (2007): 598–626.Google Scholar

Choi, Stephen J., and Thompson, Robert B.. “Securities Litigation and Its Lawyers: Changes During the First Decade After the PSLRA.” Columbia Law Review 106 (2006): 1489–1533.Google Scholar

Christiansen, Matthew R., and Eskridge, William N., Jr. “Congressional Overrides of Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions, 1967–2011.” Texas Law Review 92 (2014): 1317–1542.Google Scholar

Clark, Tom S. The Limits of Judicial Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Clarke, Brian S. “Better Route through the Swamp: Causal Coherence in Disparate Treatment Doctrine.” Rutgers Law Review 65 (2013): 723–786.Google Scholar

Clermont, Kevin M., and Schwab, Stewart J.. “How Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs Fare in Federal Court.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (2004): 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clermont, Kevin M., and Schwab, Stewart J.. “Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs in Federal Court: From Bad to Worse?” Harvard Law and Policy Review 3(2009): 103–132.Google Scholar

CoffeeJr., John C. “Rescuing the Private Attorney General: Why the Model of the Lawyer as Bounty Hunter Is Not Working.” Maryland Law Review 42 (1983): 215–288.Google Scholar

CoffeeJr., John C. Entrepreneurial Litigation: Its Rise, Fall, and Future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary. “Social Movements, Law, and Society: The Institutionalization of the Environmental Movement.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150 (2001): 85–118.Google Scholar

Cole, David. Engines of Liberty: The Power of Social Activists to Make Constitutional Law. New York: Basic Books, 2016.Google Scholar

Coleman, Brooke D. “The Efficiency Norm.” Boston College Law Review 56 (2015): 1777–1827.Google Scholar

Colker, Ruth. “The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Windfall for Defendants.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 34(1999): 99–162.Google Scholar

Colvin, Alexander J. S. “An Empirical Study of Employment Arbitration: Case Outcomes and Processes.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8(2011): 5–23.Google Scholar

Corbett, William R. “Fixing Employment Discrimination Law,” Southern Methodist University Law Review 62 (2009): 81–116.Google Scholar

Correia, Maria, and Klausner, Michael. “Are Securities Class Actions ‘Supplemental’ to SEC Enforcement? An Empirical Analysis.” Working Paper, 2012.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, Kimberle. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Policies.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1989): 139–167.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, Kimberle, Gotanda, Neil, Peller, Gary, and Thomas, Kendall, eds. Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New York: The New Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Cross, Frank B. “Rethinking Environmental Citizen Suits.” Temple Environmental Law and Technology Journal 8 (1989): 55–76.Google Scholar

Crouch, Margaret A. Thinking about Sexual Harassment: A Guide for the Perplexed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Dailing, Joseph A. “Their Finest Hour: Lawyers, Legal Aid, and Public Service in Illinois.” Northern Illinois University Law Review 16 (1995): 7–24.Google Scholar

Danovitch, Sylvia. “Humanizing Institutional History: Oral History at the EEOC.” Prologue Winter (1995): 335–347.Google Scholar

Davidson, Chandler. “The Voting Rights Act: A Brief History.” In Controversies in Minority Voting: The Voting Rights Act in Perspective, edited by Grofman, Bernard and Davidson, Chandler, 7–34. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Davis, Lennard J. Enabling Act: The Hidden Story of How the Americans with Disabilities Act Gave the Largest U.S. Minority Its Rights. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Decker, Jefferson. The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers and the Remaking of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Deitch, Cynthia, and Hegewisch, Ariane. “Title VII and Race Discrimination Litigation Settlements as Opportunities for Organizational Change,” Journal of Business and Psychology 28 (2013): 425–438.Google Scholar

Delgado, Richard, and Stefancic, Jean. Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Deming, David J., Yuchtman, Noam, Abulafi, Amira, Goldin, Claudia, and Katz, Lawrence F., “The Value of Postsecondary Credentials in the Labor Market: An Experimental Study.” American Economic Review 106 (2016): 778–806.Google Scholar

Derfner, Mary Frances. “One Giant Step: The Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act.” Saint Louis University Law Journal 21 (1977): 441–451.Google Scholar

Derthick, Martha. Up in Smoke: From Legislation to Litigation in Tobacco Politics. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Depoorter, Ben. “The Upside of Losing.” Columbia Law Review 113 (2013) 817–862.Google Scholar

Devins, Neal, and Baum, Lawrence. “Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned the Supreme Court into a Partisan Court.” Supreme Court Review (2016): 301–366.Google Scholar

Devito, Scott, and Jurs, Andrew W.. “‘Doubling-Down’ for Defendants: The Pernicious Effects of Tort Reform.” Pennsylvania State Law Review 118 (2014): 543–600.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul, and Powell, Walter W.. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Collective Rationality and Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (1983): 147–160.Google Scholar

DiTomaso, Nancy. The American Non-Dilemma: Racial Inequality without Racism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2013.Google Scholar

Dobbin, Frank. Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbin, Frank, and Sutton, John R.. “The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (1998): 441–476.Google Scholar

Dodd, Lynda G. “Implementing the Rule of Law: The Role of Citizen Plaintiffs.” The Good Society 13 (2004): 36–44.Google Scholar

Dodd, Lynda G. “The Rights Revolution in the Age of Obama and Ferguson: Policing, the Rule of Law, and the Elusive Quest for Accountability.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (2015): 1–25.Google Scholar

Dodd, Lynda G. Taming the Rights Revolution: Constitutional Torts, the Supreme Court, and the Elusive Quest for Accountability (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

DonohueIII, John J., and Siegelman, Peter. “The Changing Nature of Employment Discrimination.” Stanford Law Review 43 (1991): 983–1033.Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace.” American Journal of Sociology 59 (1990): 1401–1440.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (1992): 1531–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Smyth, Aaron C., and Rahim, Asad. “Empirical Sociolegal and Critical Race Perspectives on Antidiscrimination Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12 (2016): 295–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Abraham, Steven E., and Erlanger, Howard S.. “Professional Construction of Law: The Inflated Threat of Wrongful Discharge.” Law & Society Review 26 (1992): 47–83.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Erlanger, Howard S., and Lande, John. “Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace.” Law & Society Review 27 (1993): 497–534.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Krieger, Linda H., Eliason, Scott R., Albiston, Catherine R., and Mellema, Virginia. “When Organizations Rule: Judicial Deference to Institutionalized Employment Structures.” American Journal of Sociology 117(2011): 888–954.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Leachman, Gwendolyn, and McAdam, Doug. “On Law, Organizations, and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6 (2010): 653–85.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., and Suchman, Mark C.. “The Legal Environments of Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology 23 (1997): 479–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Uggen, Christopher, and Erlanger, Howard S.. “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (1999): 406–454.Google Scholar

Edwards, Laura. A Legal History of the Civil War and Reconstruction: A Nation of Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Eidmann, Kathryn. “Comment – Ledbetter in Congress: The Limits of Narrow Legislative Overrides.” Yale Law Journal 117 (2009): 971–979.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Theodore. “Four Decades of Federal Civil Rights Litigation.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 12 (2015): 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engler, Mark, and Engler, Paul, This is an Uprising: How Nonviolent Revolt in Shaping the Twenty-First Century. New York: Nation Books, 2016.Google Scholar

Engstrom, David Freeman. “Agencies as Litigation Gatekeepers.” Yale Law Journal 123 (2013): 616–648.Google Scholar

Engstrom, David Freeman. “Private Enforcement’s Pathways: Lessons from Qui Tam Litigation.” Columbia Law Review 114 (2014): 1913–2006.Google Scholar

Engstrom, David Freeman. “The Twiqbal Puzzle and Empirical Study of Civil Procedure.” Stanford Law Review 65 (2014): 1203–1248.Google Scholar

Engstrom, David Freeman. “The Civil Rights Act at Fifty: Past, Present, and Future,” Stanford Law Review 66 (2014):1195–1204.Google Scholar

Engstrom, David Freeman. “Whither Whistleblowing? Bounty Regimes, Regulatory Context, and the Challenge of Optimal Design.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 15 (2014): 605–633.Google Scholar

Epp, Charles. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Epp, Charles. “Courts and the Rights Revolution,” in Institutions of American Democracy: The Judicial Branch, edited by Hall, Kermit L. and McGuire, Kevin T., 343–374. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Epp, Charles. Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Epp, Charles. “Taking Policy Seriously.” Law & Society Review 50 (2016): 40–50.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A.. “How Business Fares in the Supreme Court.” Minnesota Law Review 97(2013): 1431–1473.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard. Forbidden Grounds: The Case against Employment Discrimination Laws. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard. “The Role of Guidances in Modern Administrative Procedure: The Case for De Novo Review.” Journal of Legal Analysis 8 (2016): 47–93.Google Scholar

Eskridge Jr., William N. “Theories of Harassment ‘Because of Sex.’” In Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, edited by MacKinnon, Catharine and Siegel, Reva, 155–168. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

EskridgeJr., William N., and Ferejohn, John. “The Article I, Section 7 Game.” Georgetown Law Journal 80 (1992): 523–564.Google Scholar

EskridgeJr., William N., and Ferejohn, John. “Virtual Logrolling: How the Court, Congress, and the States Multiply Rights.” Southern California Law Review 68 (1995): 1545–1563.Google Scholar

EskridgeJr., William N., and Ferejohn, John. A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

EskridgeJr., William N., and Schwartz, Kevin S.. “Chevron and Agency Norm-Entrepreneurship.” Yale Law Review 115 (2006): 2623–2632.Google Scholar

Estlund, Cynthia. “The Story of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins.” In Employment Discrimination Stories, edited by Friedman, Joel Wm. (New York: Foundation Press 2006), 65–103.Google Scholar

Faigman, David L., Dasgupta, Nilanjana, and Ridgeway, Cecilia L.. “Matter of Fit: The Law of Discrimination and the Science of Implicit Bias.” Hastings Law Journal 59 (2007): 1389–1434.Google Scholar

Farhang, Sean. “Public Regulation and Private Lawsuits in the American Separation of Powers System.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2008): 821–839.Google Scholar

Farhang, Sean. The Litigation State: Public Regulation and Private Lawsuits in the U.S. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Farhang, Sean. “Legislative-Executive Conflict and Private Statutory Litigation in the United States: Evidence from Labor, Civil Rights, and Environmental Law.” Law and Social Inquiry 37 (2012): 657–685.Google Scholar

Farhang, Sean, and Katznelson, Ira. “The Southern Imposition: Congress and Labor in the New Deal and Fair Deal.” Studies in American Political Development 19 (2005): 1–30.Google Scholar

Farhang, Sean, and Spencer, Douglas M.. “Economic Recovery Rules and Attorney Representation in Civil Rights Litigation.” Journal of Law and Courts 2 (2014): 241–271.Google Scholar

Feeley, Malcolm M., and Rubin, Edward L.. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …” Law & Society Review 15 (1980–81) 631–654.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, and Shipan, Charles. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law Economics, and Organization 6 (1990): 1–20.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. “Legislative Choice of Regulatory Forms: Legal Process or Administrative Process?” Public Choice 39 (1982): 33–66.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. “Legislator Uncertainty, Legislative Control, and the Delegation of Legislative Power.” Journal of Law Economics, and Organization 2 (1986): 33–52.Google Scholar

Fisk, Catherine, and Chemerinsky, Erwin. “The Failing Faith in Class Actions: Dukes v. Wal-Mart and AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion.” Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy 7 (2011): 11–54.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen. “Against Settlement.” Yale Law Journal 93 (1984): 1073–1092.Google Scholar

Foner, Eric. Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877. New York: Harper Collins, 1988.Google Scholar

Forbath, William E. “Civil Rights and Economic Citizenship: Notes on the Past and Future of the Civil Rights and Labor Movements.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law 2 (2000): 697–718.Google Scholar

Ford, Richard Thomas. Rights Gone Wrong: How Law Corrupts the Struggle for Equality. New York: Fararr, Straus and Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar

Ford, Richard Thomas. “Bias in the Air: Rethinking Employment Discrimination Law.” Stanford Law Review 66 (2014): 1381–1421.Google Scholar

Fox, Justin, and Stephenson, Matthew C.. “Judicial Review as a Response to Political Posturing.” American Political Science Review 105 (2011): 397–414.Google Scholar

Franke, Katherine M. “What’s Wrong with Sexual Harassment?” In Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, edited by MacKinnon, Catharine A. and Siegel, Reva B., 169–181. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Frankenberg, Erica and Orfield, Gary, eds. The Resegregation of Suburban Schools: A Hidden Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Franklin, Cary. “Inventing the ‘Traditional Concept’ of Sex Discrimination.” Harvard Law Review 125 (2012): 1308–1380.Google Scholar

Franklin, David L. “What Kind of Business-Friendly Court: Explaining the Chamber of Commerce’s Success at the Roberts Court.” Santa Clara Law Review 49 (2009): 1019–1061.Google Scholar

Fraser, Thomas J. “Interpretive Rules: Can the Amount of Deference Accorded Them Offer Insight into the Procedural Inquiry.” Boston University Law Review 90 (2010): 1303–1330.Google Scholar

Frederickson, Caroline. Under the Bus: How Working Women Are Being Run Over. New York: The New Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Freeman, Jo. Women: A Feminist Perspective. 5th ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co., 1995.Google Scholar

Freeman, Jo. We Will Be Heard: Women’s Struggles for Political Power in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar

Friedan, Betty. The Feminine Mystique. New York: W. W. Norton, 1963.Google Scholar

Friedman, Barry. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.Google Scholar

Fryer, Jr., Roland G., Pager, Devah, and Spenkuch, Jorg L.. “Racial Disparities in Job Finding and Offered Wages.” Journal of Law and Economics 56 (2013): 633–689.Google Scholar

Frymer, Paul. “Acting When Elected Officials Won’t: Federal Courts and Civil Rights Enforcement in U.S. Labor Unions, 1935–85.” American Political Science Review 97 (2003): 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frymer, Paul. Black and Blue: African Americans, the Labor Movement, and the Decline of the Democratic Party. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Fuentes, Sonia Pressman. Eat First-You Don’t Know What They’ll Give You: The Adventures of an Immigrant Family and Their Feminist Daughter. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris, 1999.Google Scholar

Gaetke, Eugene R, and Schwemm, Robert G. “Government Lawyers and Their Private Clients Under the Fair Housing Act.” George Washington Law Review 65 (1996): 329–378.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9 (1974): 95–160.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc. “The Radiating Effects of Courts.” In Empirical Theories about Courts, edited by Boyum, Keith O. and Matther, Lynn, 117–142. New York: Longman, 1983.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc. “Old and in the Way: The Coming Demographic Transformation of the Legal Profession and Its Implications for the Provision of Legal Services, Wisconsin Law Review (1999) 1081–1118.Google Scholar

Garber, Steven, Greenberg, Michael D., Rhodes, Hilary, Zhuo, Ziaohui, and Adams, John L.. “Do Noneconomic Damages Caps and Attorney Fee Limits Reduce Access to Justice for Victims of Medical Negligence?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6 (2009): 637–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, Paul J. “Mobilizing Litigants: Private Enforcement of Public Laws.” PhD diss., Princeton University, 2015.Google Scholar

Gelbach, Jonah. “Measuring the Effects of a Heightened Pleading Standard under Twombly and Iqbal.” Searle Civil Justice Institute, George Mason University School of Law. Working Paper, 2013.Google Scholar

George, Warren E. “Development of the Legal Services Corporation.” Cornell Law Review 61(1976): 681–730.Google Scholar

Gersen, Jacob E., and Gersen, Jeannie Suk. “The Sex Bureaucracy.” California Law Review 104 (2016): 881–948.Google Scholar

Gertner, Nancy. “Loser’s Rules.” Yale Law Journal Online 122 (2012): 109–124.Google Scholar

Gertner, Nancy. “The Judicial Repeal of the Johnson/Kennedy Administration’s ‘Signature Achievement’.” In A Nation of Widening Opportunities: The Civil Rights Act at Fifty, edited by Bagenstos, Samuel and Katz, Ellen. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Gilles, Myriam. “The Day Doctrine Died: Private Arbitration and the End of Law.” University of Illinois Law Review 2016 (2016): 371–424.Google Scholar

Gillman, Howard. “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Court in the United States, 1875–1891.” American Political Science Review 96 (2002): 511–524.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Glover, J. Maria. “The Structural Role of Private Enforcement Mechanisms in Public Law.” William & Mary Law Review 53 (2012): 1137–1217.Google Scholar

Glover, J. Maria. “The Federal Rules of Civil Settlement.” New York University Law Review 87 (2012): 1713–1778.Google Scholar

Glover, J. Maria. “Disappearing Claims and the Erosion of Substantive Law.” Yale Law Journal 124 (2015): 3052–3092.Google Scholar

Gluck, Abbe R., O’Connell, Anne Joseph, and Po, Rosa. “Unorthodox Lawmaking, Unorthodox Rulemaking.” Columbia Law Review 115 (2015): 1789–1865.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia. “A Grand Convergence: Its Last Chapter.” American Economic Review 104 (2014): 1091–1119.Google Scholar

Goldman, Sheldon. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Gough, Mark D. “The High Costs of an Inexpensive Forum: An Empirical Analysis of Discrimination Claims Heard in Arbitration and Civil Litigation.” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 35 (2014): 91–112.Google Scholar

Gould, Jon B. Speak No Evil: The Triumph of Hate Speech Regulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Gould, Jon, and Barclay, Scott, “Mind the Gap: The Place of Gap Studies in Sociolegal Scholarship,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8 (2012): 323–335.Google Scholar

Govan, Reginald C. “Framing Issues and Acquiring Codes: An Overview of the Legislative Sojourn of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.” DePaul Law Review 41(1992): 1057–1083.Google Scholar

Graber, Mark. “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7 (1993): 35–73.Google Scholar

Graham, Hugh Davis. The Civil Rights Era: Origins and Development of National Policy, 1960–1972. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Graham, Hugh Davis. “Since 1964: The Paradox of American Civil Rights Regulation.” In Taking Stock: American Government in the Twentieth Century, edited by Keller, Morton and Melnick, R. Shep. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Graham, Hugh Davis. ”The Surprising Career of Federal Fair Housing Law.” Journal of Policy History 12 (2000): 215–232.Google Scholar

Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Green, Tristin K. “A Structural Approach as Antidiscrimination Mandate: Locating Employer Wrong.” Vanderbilt Law Review 60 (2007): 847–904.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Jack. Crusaders in the Courts: How a Dedicated Band of Lawyers Fought for the Civil Rights Revolution. New York: Basic Books, 1994.Google Scholar

Greve, Michael S. “Why ‘Defunding the Left’ Failed.” Public Interest 89 (1987): 91–106.Google Scholar

Greve, Michael S., and Parrish, Ashley C.. “Administrative Law without Congress.” George Mason Law Review 22 (2015): 501–547.Google Scholar

Grossman, Joanna L. “The Culture of Compliance: The Final Triumph of Form over Substance in Sexual Harassment Law.” Harvard Women’s Law Journal 26 (2003): 3–75.Google Scholar

Grossman, Joel B., Sarat, Austin, Kritzer, Herbert M., McDougal, Stephen, Bumiller, Kristin, and Miller, Richard. “Dimensions of Institutional Participation: Who Uses the Courts, and How?” Journal of Politics 44(1982): 86–114.Google Scholar

Grundfest, Joseph A. “Disimplying Private Rights of Action Under the Federal Securities Laws: The Commission’s Authority.” Harvard Law Review 107 (1994): 961–1024.Google Scholar

Gunningham, Neil, Kagan, Robert A., and Thornton, Dorothy. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Gunningham, Neil, and Sinclair, Darren. “Organizational Trust and the Limits of Management-Based Regulation.” Law & Society Review 43 (2009): 865–900.Google Scholar

Hadfield, Gillian K. “Bias in the Evolution of Legal Rules.” Georgetown Law Journal 80 (1992): 583–616.Google Scholar

Haire, Susan B., and Moyer, Laura P.. Diversity Matters: Judicial Policy Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Halpern, Stephen C. On the Limits of the Law: The Ironic Legacy of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hahn, Hahrie. How Organizations Develop Activists: Civic Associations and Leadership in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Harper, Michael C. “Class-Based Adjudication of Title VII in the Age of the Roberts Court.” Boston University Law Review 95 (2015): 1099–1131.Google Scholar

Hamburger, Philip. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Harper, Michael C., and Flyn, Joan. “Burlington v. Ellerth and Faragher v. Boca Raton: Federal Common Lawmaking for the Modern Age.” In Employment Discrimination Stories, edited by Friedman, Joel Wm., 225–258. New York: Foundation Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Harrison, Cynthia Ellen. On Account of Sex: the Politics of Women’s Issues, 1945–1968. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hart, Melissa. “Skepticism and Expertise: The Supreme Court and the EEOC.” Fordham Law Review 74 (2006): 1937–1962.Google Scholar

Hasen, Richard. “End of the Dialogue: Political Polarization, the Supreme Court, and Congress.” Southern California Law Review 86 (2012): 101–155.Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona A. “Path Dependence in the Law: The Course and Pattern of Legal Change in a Common Law System.” Iowa Law Review 86 (2001): 601–666.Google Scholar

Hilbink, Thomas. “Constructing Cause Lawyering: Professionalism, Politics, and Social Change in 1960s America.” PhD diss., New York University, 2006.Google Scholar

Hill, Herbert. “The Equal Employment Opportunity Acts of 1964 and 1972: A Critical Analysis of the Legislative History and Administration of the Law.” Industrial Relations Law Journal 2 (1977): 1–96.Google Scholar

Hill, Herbert. “Black Workers, Organized Labor, and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act: Legislative History and Litigation Record.” In Race in America: The Struggle for Equality, edited by Hill, Herbert and Jones, James E. Jr., 263–344. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. “The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through the Constitutionalization of Rights: Lessons from Four Polities.” Law and Social Inquiry 25 (2000): 91–149.Google Scholar

Hirsh, Elizabeth. “Settling for Less? Organizational Determinants of Discrimination-Charge Outcomes.” Law & Society Review 42 (2008): 239–274.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Sharona. “Settling the Matter: Does Title I of the ADA Work?” Alabama Law Review 59 (2008): 305–344.Google Scholar

Hollis-Brusky, Amanda. Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Houseman, Alan W., and Perle, Linda E.. “Securing Equal Justice for All: A Brief History of Civil Legal Assistance in the United States.” Center for Law and Social Policy. Working Paper, 2007.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, Jennifer, Nash, Jennifer, and Coglianese, Cary. “Constructing the License to Operate: Internal Factors and Their Influence on Corporate Environmental Decisions.” Law & Policy 30 (2008): 73–107.Google Scholar

Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R.. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hyman, David A., Black, Bernard S., Silver, Charles, and Sage, William. “Estimating the Effect of Damages Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases: Evidence from Texas.” Journal of Legal Analysis 1 (2009): 355–410.Google Scholar

Irons, Peter. The Courage of Their Convictions: Sixteen Americans Who Fought Their Way to the Supreme Court. New York: Penguin Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Issacharoff, Samuel. “Voting Rights at 50.” Alabama Law Review 67 (2015): 387–414.Google Scholar

Jackson, Kenneth T. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary. “Partisan Polarization in Presidential Support: The Electoral Connection.” Congress and the Presidency 30 (2003): 1–36.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jeffery A., and Patashnik, Eric M., eds. Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Jenness, Valerie, and Grattet, Ryken. Making Hate a Crime: From Social Movement to Law Enforcement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001.Google Scholar

Johannsen, August T. “Mitigating the Impact of Title VII’s New Retaliation Standard: The Americans with Disabilities Act after University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar.” William & Mary Law Review 56(2014): 301–340.Google Scholar

JohnsonJr., Earl. Justice and Reform: The Formative Years of the American Legal Services Program. Piscatway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1978.Google Scholar

JohnsonJr., Earl. “Lifting the ‘American Exceptionalism’ Curtain: Options and Lessons from Abroad.” Hastings Law Journal 67 (2016) 1225–1264.Google Scholar

Johnson, Olatunde C. A. “Beyond the Private Attorney General: Equality Directives in American Law.” New York University Law Review 87 (2012): 1339–1412.Google Scholar

Jois, Goutam U. “Pearson, Iqbal, and Procedural Activism.” Florida State University Law Review 27 (2010): 901–944.Google Scholar

Jost, John T., Rudman, Laurie A., Blair, Irene V., Carney, Dana R., Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Glaser, Jack, and Hardin, Curtis D.. “The Existence of Implicit Bias Is Beyond Reasonable Doubt: A Refutation of Ideological and Methodological Objections and Executive Summary of Ten Studies that No Manager Should Ignore.” Research in Organizational Behavior 29 (2009): 39–69.Google Scholar

Kagan, Robert A. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Kakalik, James S, Dunworth, Terence, Hill, Laural A., McCaffrey, Daniel F., Oshiro, Marian, Pace, Nicholas M., and Vaiana, Mary E.. An Evaluation of Judicial Case Management Under the Civil Justice Reform Act. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1997.Google Scholar

Kakalik, James S, Dunworth, Terence, Hill, Laural A., McCaffrey, Daniel F., Oshiro, Marian, Pace, Nicholas M., and Vaiana, Mary E.. “Just, Speedy, and Inexpensive? An Evaluation of Judicial Case Management under the Civil Justice Reform Act.” Alabama Law Review 49 (1997): 17–49.Google Scholar

Kalev, Alexandra, Dobbin, Frank, and Kelly, Erin, “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.” American Sociological Review 71 (2006): 589–617.Google Scholar

Karlan, Pamela S. “David C. Baum Memorial Lecture: Disarming the Private Attorney General.” University of Illinois Law Review 2003 (2003): 183–209.Google Scholar

Kastellec, Jonathan. “Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2013): 167–183.Google Scholar

Katz, Alyssa. The Influence Machine: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Corporate Capture of American Life. New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2015.Google Scholar

Katznelson, Ira. When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005.Google Scholar

Katznelson, Ira, and Mulroy, Quinn. “Was the South Pivotal? Situated Partisanship and Policy Coalitions During the New Deal and Fair Deal.” Journal of Politics 74 (2012): 604–620.Google Scholar

Kaye, H. Stephen, Kang, Taewoon, and Laplante, Mitchell P.. “Wheelchair Use in the United States.” Disability Statistics Abstract 23 (2002): 1–4.Google Scholar

Keck, Thomas M. The Most Activist Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Keck, Thomas M. Judicial Politics in Polarized Times. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Kerwin, Cornelius M. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Kessler, Daniel P., ed. Regulation versus Litigation: Perspectives from Economics and Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar

King, Desmond S., and Smith, Rogers M.. Still a House Divided: Race and Politics in Obama’s America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies 2nd ed. New York: Pearson, 2010.Google Scholar

Kornhauser, Lewis, and Mnookin, Robert H.. “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce.” Yale Law Journal 88(1979): 950–997.Google Scholar

Kotkin, Minna J. “Invisible Settlements, Invisible Discrimination,” North Carolina Law Review 84 (2006): 927–978.Google Scholar

Kotkin, Minna J. “Outing Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Confidential Employment Discrimination Settlements.” Washington and Lee Law Review 64 (2007):111–164.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Krieger, Linda Hamilton. “The Content of Our Categories: A Cognitive Bias Approach to Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity.” Stanford Law Review 47 (1995): 1161–1248.Google Scholar

Krieger, Linda Hamilton, and Fiske, Susan T., “Behavioral Realism in Employment Discrimination Law: Implicit Bias and Disparate Treatment.” California Law Review 95(2006): 997–1062.Google Scholar

Krieger, Linda Hamilton, Best, Rachel Kahn, and Edelman, Lauren B., “When ‘Best Practices’ Win, Employees Lose: Symbolic Compliance and Judicial Inference in Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Cases.” Law and Social Inquiry 40 (2015): 843–879.Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M. “Studying Disputes: Learning from the CLRP Experience.” Law & Society Review 15 (1980–81): 503–524.Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M. “Lawyer Fees and Lawyer Behavior in Litigation: What Does the Empirical Literature Really Say?” Texas Law Review 80 (2002): 1943–1983.Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M. Risks, Reputations, and Rewards: Contingency Fee Legal Practice in the United States. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M., Sarat, Austin, Trubek, David M., Bumiller, Kristin, and McNichol, Elizabeth. “Understanding the Costs of Litigation: The Case of the Hourly-Fee Lawyer.” Law and Social Inquiry 9 (1984): 559–581.Google Scholar

KrotoszynskiJr., Ronald J. “Why Deference? Implied Delegations, Agency Expertise, and the Misplaced Legacy of Skidmore.” Administrative Law Review 54 (2002): 736–756.Google Scholar

Kyckelhahn, Tracey, and Cohen, Thomas H., “Civil Rights Complaints in U.S. District Courts, 1990–2006.” Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, 2008. www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/crcusdc06.pdfGoogle Scholar

Lahav, Alexandra. In Praise of Litigation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A.. “The Private Enforcement of Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 4 (1975): 1–46.Google Scholar

Landy, Marc K. and Levin, Martin A., eds. The New Politics of Public Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Lareau, Annette, and Goyette, Kimberley, eds. Choosing Homes, Choosing Schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2014.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Charles R. “The Id, the Ego, and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism.” Stanford Law Review 39 (1987): 317–388.Google Scholar

Lazarus, Edward P. Closed Chambers: The First Eyewitness Account of the Epic Struggles Inside the Supreme Court. New York: Crown, 1998.Google Scholar

Lazarus, Simon. “Hertz or Avis? Progressives’ Quest to Reclaim the Constitution and the Courts.” Ohio State Law Journal 72 (2011): 1201–1249.Google Scholar

Lee, Sophia Z. “Race, Sex, and Rulemaking: Administrative Constitutionalism and the Workplace, 1960 to Present.” Virginia Law Review 96 (2010): 799–886.Google Scholar

Lee, Sophia Z. The Workplace Constitution from the New Deal to the New Right. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Lemos, Margaret H. “The Consequences of Congress’s Choice of Delegate: Judicial and Agency Interpretations of Title VII.” Vanderbilt Law Review 63 (2010): 361–436.Google Scholar

Lemos, Margaret H. “Special Incentives to Sue.” Minnesota Law Review 95(2011): 782–845.Google Scholar

Lemos, Margaret H. “State Enforcement of Federal Law.” New York University Law Review 86 (2011): 698–765.Google Scholar

Lemos, Margaret H. “Aggregate Litigation Goes Public: Representative Suits by State Attorneys General.” Harvard Law Review 126 (2012): 486–549.Google Scholar

Lemos, Margaret H. “The Politics of Textualism.” Notre Dame Law Review 89 (2013): 849–907.Google Scholar

Lemos, Margaret H. “For-Profit Public Enforcement.” Harvard Law Review 127 (2014): 853–913.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, Nelson. State of the Union: A Century of American Labor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Robert C. “Weak State, Strong Policy: Paradoxes of Race Policy in the United States, Great Britain, and France.” Studies in American Political Development 16 (2002): 138–161.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Robert C. Shaping Race Policy: The United States in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Robert C. “Private Power and the American Bureaucracy: The EEOC and Civil Rights Enforcement.” Working Paper, 2007.Google Scholar

Light, Paul C. The True Size of Government. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lobel, Orly. “The Paradox of Extralegal Activism: Critical Legal Consciousness and Transformative Politics.” Harvard Law Review 120 (2007): 937–988.Google Scholar

Love, Jean C. “Damages: A Remedy for the Violation of Constitutional Rights.” California Law Review 67 (1979): 1242–1285.Google Scholar

Lovell, George I. “Justice Excused: The Deployment of Law in Everyday Political Encounters.” Law & Society Review 40 (2006): 283–324.Google Scholar

Lovell, George I. This Is Not Civil Rights: Discovering Rights Talk in 1939 America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Lovell, George I., McCann, Michael, and Taylor, Kirstine. “Covering Legal Mobilization: A Bottom-Up Analysis of Wards Cove.” Law and Social Inquiry 41(2016): 61–99.Google Scholar

Lowande, Kenneth S., and Milkis, Sidney M.. “‘We Can’t Wait’: Barack Obama, Partisan Polarization and the Administrative Presidency.” The Forum 12 (2014): 3–27.Google Scholar

Luban, David. “Settlements and the Erosion of the Public Realm.” Georgetown Law Journal 83 (1995): 2619–2662.Google Scholar

Luban, David. “Taking Out the Adversary: The Assault on Progressive Public-Interest Lawyers.” California Law Review 91 (2003): 209–246.Google Scholar

Macey, Jonathan R., and Miller, Geoffrey P. “Reflections on Professional Responsibility in a Regulatory State.” George Washington Law Review 63 (1995): 1105–1120.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine A. Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

MacLean, Nancy. Freedom Is Not Enough: The Opening of the American Workplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Manning, John F. “Constitutional Structure and Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Agency Rules.” Columbia Law Review 96 (1996): 612–696.Google Scholar

Marshall, Anna-Maria. “Idle Rights: Employees’ Rights Consciousness and the Construction of Sexual Harassment Policies.” Law & Society Review 39 (2005): 83–124.Google Scholar

Martin, Andrew W., Baumgartner, Frank R., and McCarthy, John D.. “Measuring Association Populations using the Encyclopedia of Associations: Evidence from the Field of Labor Unions.” Social Science Research 35(2006): 771–778.Google Scholar

Mason, Karen Oppenheim, Czajka, John L., and Arber, Sara. “Change in U.S. Women’s Sex-Role Attitudes, 1964–1974.” American Sociological Review 41 (1976): 573–596.Google Scholar

Massey, Douglas S., and Denton, Nancy A.. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

May, Gary. Bending Toward Justice: The Voting Rights Act and the Transformation of American Democracy. New York: Basic Books, 2013.Google Scholar

May, Peter J. “Compliance Motivations: Affirmative and Negative Bases.” Law & Society Review 38 (2004): 41–68.Google Scholar

May, Peter J. “Compliance Motivations: Perspectives of Farmers, Homebuilders, and Marine Facilities.” Law & Policy 27 (2005): 317–347.Google Scholar

May, Peter J., and Winter, Søren. “Regulatory Enforcement and Compliance: Examining Danish Agro-environmental Policy.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18 (1999): 625–651.Google Scholar

May, Peter J., and Wood, Robert S.. “At the Regulatory Front Lines: Inspectors’ Enforcement Styles and Regulatory Compliance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (2003): 117–139.Google Scholar

Mayer, Jane. Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Funding the Radical Right. New York: Doubleday, 2016.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug and Kloos, Karina. Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Postwar America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

McAfee, R. Preston, Mialon, Hugo M., and Mialon, Sue H.. “Private v. Public Antitrust Enforcement: A Strategic Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (2008): 1863–1875.Google Scholar

McAlevey, Jane F. No Shortcuts: Organizing for Power in the New Gilded Age. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

McCann, Michael W. Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives on Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

McCann, Michael W. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar

McCann, Michael W. “Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being So Positive).” Law and Social Inquiry 21 (1996): 457–482.Google Scholar

McCann, Michael W. “The Unbearable Lightness of Rights: On Sociolegal Inquiry in the Global Era.” Law & Society Review 48 (2014): 245–273.Google Scholar

McCann, Michael, and Haltom, William, Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan. “The Policy Effects of Political Polarization.” In The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Transformation of Conservatism, edited by Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda, 223–255. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

McCormick, Marcia L. “The Truth is Out There: Revamping Federal Antidiscrimination Enforcement for the Twenty-first Century.” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law (2009): 193–231.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1984): 166–179.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Matthew D., Noll, Roger G., and Weingast, Barry R.. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3 (1987): 243–278.Google Scholar

McGarity, Thomas W. “Regulatory Reform in the Reagan Era.” Maryland Law Review 45 (1986): 253–273.Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep. Between the Lines: Interpreting Welfare Rights. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep. “From Tax and Spend to Mandate and Sue: Liberalism after the Great Society.” In The Great Society and the High Tide of Liberalism, edited by Milkis, Sidney and Mileur, Jerome M., 387–410. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep. “Deregulating the States: The Political Jurisprudence of the Rehnquist Court.” In Institutions and Public Law: Comparative Approaches, edited by Ginsburg, Thomas and Kagan, Robert, 69–95. New York: Peter Lang, 2005.Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep. “The Supreme Court and the Civil Rights State.” Working Paper, 2011.Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep. “Adversarial Legalism, Civil Rights, and the American State.” Working Paper, 2012.Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep. “Courts and Agencies in the American Civil Rights State.” In The Politics of Major Policy Change in Postwar America, edited by Jenkins, Jeffrey A. and Milkis, Sidney M., 77–102. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep. “The Odd Evolution of the Civil Rights State.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 37 (2014): 113–134.Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep. “The Conventional Misdiagnosis: Why ‘Gridlock’ is Not Our Central Problem and Constitutional Revision Is Not the Solution.” Boston University Law Review 94 (2014): 767–793.Google Scholar

Metzger, Gillian. “Agencies, Polarization, and the States.” Columbia Law Review 115 (2015): 1739–1787.Google Scholar

Miller, Arthur R. “The Pretrial Rush to Judgment: Are the ‘Litigation Explosion,’ ‘Liability Crisis,’ and Efficiency Clichés Eroding Our Day in Court and Jury Trial Commitments?” New York University Law Review 78 (2003): 982–1134.Google Scholar

Miller, Richard E., and Sarat, Austin. “Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture.” Law & Society Review 15 (1980–81): 525–566.Google Scholar

Modesitt, Nancy M. “Reinventing the EEOC.” Southern Methodist University Law Review 63 (2010): 1237–1277.Google Scholar

Moe, Terry M. “Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the NLRB.” American Political Science Review 79 (1985): 1094–1116.Google Scholar

Moe, Terry M. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6 (1990): 213–254.Google Scholar

Moore, Patricia W. Hatamyar. “The Anti-Plaintiff Pending Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Pro-Defendant Composition of the Federal Rulemaking Committees.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 83 (2015): 1083–1154.Google Scholar

Moot, John S. “Analysis of Judicial Deference to EEOC Interpretative Guidelines.” Administrative Law Journal 1 (1987): 213–252.Google Scholar

Moran, Rachel F. “Undone by Law: The Uncertain Legacy of Lau v. Nichols.” Berkeley La Raza Law Journal 16 (2005): 1–10.Google Scholar

Moe, Terry M. “The Story of Lau v. Nichols: Breaking the Silence in Chinatown.” In Education Law Stories, edited by Olivas, Michael A. and Schneider, Ronna Greff, 111–158. New York: Foundation Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Morgan, Denise C., Godsil, Rachel D., and Moses, Joy, eds. Awakening from the Dream: Civil Rights Under Siege and the New Struggle for Equal Justice. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Morriss, Andrew P., Yandle, Bruce, and Dorchak, Andrew, Regulation by Litigation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Moss, Scott. “Bad Briefs, Bad Law, Bad Markets: Documenting the Poor Quality of Plaintiffs’ Briefs, Its Impact on the Law, and the Market Failure it Reflects.” Emory Law Journal 63 (2015): 59–125.Google Scholar

Muir, William Ker. Law and Attitude Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Mulroy, Quinn. “Public Regulation through Private Litigation: The Regulatory Power of Private Lawsuits and the American Bureaucracy.” PhD diss., Columbia University, 2012.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter F. “Reagan’s Judicial Strategy.” In Looking Back on the Reagan Presidency, edited by Berman, Larry, 207–237. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Munroe, Maurice E. R. “The EEOC: Pattern and Practice Imperfect.” Yale Law & Policy Review 13 (1995): 219–280.Google Scholar

Nagareda, Richard A. Mass Torts in a World of Settlement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Neilly, Clark N. Terms of Engagement: How Our Courts Should Enforce the Constitution’s Promise of Limited Government. New York: Encounter Books, 2013.Google Scholar

NeJaime, Douglas. “Winning Through Losing.” Iowa Law Review 96 (2011): 941–1012.Google Scholar

NeJaime, Douglas. “Cause Lawyers Inside the State.” Fordham Law Review 81 (2012): 649–704.Google Scholar

Nelson, Robert L. and Bridges, William P., Legalizing Inequality: Courts, Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women in America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Laura Beth, and Beim, Aaron. “Media Misrepresentation: Title VII, Print Media, and Public Perceptions of Discrimination Litigation.” Stanford Law & Policy Review 15 (2004): 101–130.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Laura Beth, Nelson, Robert L., and Lancaster, Ryon. “Individual Justice or Collective Legal Mobilization? Employment Discrimination Litigation in the Post Civil Rights United States.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7 (2010): 175–201.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Laura Beth, Nelson, Robert L., Lancaster, Ryon, and Pedriana, Nicholas. “Contesting Workplace Discrimination in Court: Characteristics and Outcomes of Federal Employment Discrimination Litigation 1987–2003.”American Bar Foundation Report, 2008.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Laura Beth, and Nelson, Robert L., eds. Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research: Rights and Realities. New York: Springer, 2005.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Laura Beth, and Nelson, Robert L., “Rights Realized? An Empirical Analysis of Employment Discrimination Litigation as a Claiming System.” Wisconsin Law Review (2005): 663–711.Google Scholar

Nolette, Paul. “Law Enforcement as Legal Mobilization: Reforming the Pharmaceutical Industry Through Government Litigation.” Law and Social Inquiry 40 (2015): 123–151.Google Scholar

Norton, Michael I. and Sommers, Samuel R.. “Whites See Racism as a Zero-Sum Game That They Are Now Losing.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (2011): 215–218.Google Scholar

Norton, Michael I. and Sommers, Samuel R.. “Damage Awards for Constitutional Torts: A Reconsideration after Carey v. Piphus.” Harvard Law Review 93 (1980): 966–991.Google Scholar

O’Brien, David M. “The Reagan Judges: His Most Enduring Legacy?” In The Reagan Legacy: Promise and Performance, edited by Jones, Charles O., 60–101. London: Chatham House, 1988.Google Scholar

O’Connor, Karen, and Epstein, Lee. “Rebalancing the Scales of Justice: Assessment of Public Interest Law.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 7 (1984): 483–506.Google Scholar

Occhialino, Anne Noel, and Vail, Daniel. “Why the EEOC (Still) Matters.” Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal 22 (2005): 671–708.Google Scholar

Olson, Walter K. The Excuse Factory: How Employment Law Is Paralyzing the American Workplace. New York: Free Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Olson, Walter K. The Rule of Lawyers: How the New Litigation Elite Threatens America’s Rule of Law. New York: Truman Talley Books, 2003.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, David B. “Employer Liability for Sexual Harassment by Supervisors.” In Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, edited by MacKinnon, Catharine A. and Siegel, Reva B., 272–289. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Orfield, Gary, and Eaton, Susan E., Dismantling Desegregation: The Quiet Reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: The New Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. The Policy State: An American Predicament. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Osterman, Rachel. “Origins of a Myth: Why Courts, Scholars, and the Public Think Title VII’s Ban on Sex Discrimination Was an Accident.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20 (2009): 409–440.Google Scholar

Paget, Justin F. “Did Gebser Cause the Metastasization of the Sexual Harassment Epidemic in Educational Institutions? A Critical Review of Sexual Harassment under Title IX Ten Years Later.” University of Richmond Law Review 42 (2008): 1257–1300.Google Scholar

Pai, David. “When Congress Gives You Lemons: Alternatives to Legal Services Corporation Funding in the Quest to Provide Access to Justice.” Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal 2 (2004): 83–106.Google Scholar

Paik, Myungho, Black, Bernard, and Hyman, David A.. “The Receding Tide of Medical Malpractice Litigation: Part 1 – National Trends.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (2013): 612–638.Google Scholar

Park, James J. “Rules, Principles, and the Competition to Enforce the Securities Laws.” California Law Review 100 (2010): 115–182.Google Scholar

Pasachoff, Eloise. “Special Education, Poverty, and the Limits of Private Enforcement.” Notre Dame Law Review 86 (2011): 1413–1493.Google Scholar

Pasachoff, Eloise. “Agency Enforcement of Spending Clause Statutes: A Defense of the Funding Cut-Off.” The Yale Law Journal 124 (2014): 248–335.Google Scholar

Peck, Cornelius J. “The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: Developments in the Administrative Process.” Washington Law Review 51 (1976): 831–865.Google Scholar

Pedriana, Nicholas. “Help Wanted NOW: Legal Resources, the Women’s Movement, and the Battle Over Sex Segregated Job Advertisements.” Social Problems 51 (2004): 182–201.Google Scholar

Pedriana, Nicholas, and Stryker, Robin. “The Strength of a Weak Agency: Enforcement of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Expansion of State Capacity, 1965–1971.” The American Journal of Sociology 110 (2004): 709–760.Google Scholar

Percival, Robert, and Miller, Geoffrey. “The Role of Attorney Fee Shifting in Public Interest Litigation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 47 (1984): 233–247.Google Scholar

Perino, Michael A. “Did the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Work?” University of Illinois Law Review 2003 (2003): 913–978.Google Scholar

Pettit, Becky. Invisible Men: Mass Incarceration and the Myth of Black Progress. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2012.Google Scholar

Pickerill, J. Mitchell, and Clayton, Cornell W.. “The Rehnquist Court and the Political Dynamics of Federalism.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (2004): 233–248.Google Scholar

PierceJr., Richard J. “Agency Authority to Define the Scope of Private Rights of Action.” Administrative Law Review 48 (1996): 1–30.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2000): 251–267.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. “Madison Upside Down: The Policy Roots of Our Polarized Politics.” In The Politics of Major Policy Reform in Postwar America, edited by Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Milkis, Sidney M., 282–301. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Polinsky, A. Mitchell. “Private Versus Public Enforcement of Fines.” Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1980): 105–128.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. “Regulation (Agencies) versus Litigation (Courts): An Analytical Framework.” In Regulation versus Litigation: Perspectives from Economics and Law, edited by Kessler, Daniel P., 11–26. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar

PoweJr., Lucas Scot. The Warren Court and American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Purdum, Todd S. An Idea Whose Time Has Come: Two Presidents, Two Parties, and the Battle for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. New York: Henry Holt, 2014.Google Scholar

Primus, Richard. “The Future of Disparate Impact.” Michigan Law Review 108 (2010): 1341–1387.Google Scholar

Rajabiun, Reza. “Private Enforcement of Law.” In Criminal Law and Economics, edited by Garoupa, Nuno, ch. 2. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Redish, Martin H. Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Reinert, Alexander A. “Measuring the Impact of Plausibility Pleading.” Virginia Law Review 101 (2015): 2117–2183.Google Scholar

Reiss, Albert J. “Selecting Strategies of Social Control over Organizational Life.” In Enforcing Regulation, edited by Hawkins, Keith and Thomas, John M., 23–35. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1984.Google Scholar

Resnik, Judith. “The Rights of Remedies: Collective Accounting for and Insuring Against the Harm of Sexual Harassment.” In Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, edited by MacKinnon, Catharine A. and Siegel, Reva B., 247–271. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Resnik, Judith. “Diffusing Disputes: The Public in the Private of Arbitration, the Private in Courts, and the Erasure of Rights.” Yale Law Journal 124 (2015): 2804–2939.Google Scholar

Rhode, Deborah L. Access to Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Rhode, Deborah L. “Access to Justice: An Agenda for Legal Education and Research.” Journal of Legal Education 62 (2013): 531–550.Google Scholar

Rhode, Deborah L. What Women Want: An Agenda for the Women’s Movement. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Rich, Stephen M. “A Matter of Perspective: Textualism, Stare Decisis, and Federal Employment Discrimination Law.” Southern California Law Review 87(2014): 1197–1285.Google Scholar

Risen, Clay. The Bill of the Century: The Epic Battle for the Civil Rights Act. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Robel, Lauren K. “The Politics of Crisis in the Federal Courts,” Journal on Dispute Resolution 7 (1991): 115–137.Google Scholar

Rose, Amanda M. “Reforming Securities Litigation Reform: Restructuring the Relationship between Public and Private Enforcement of Rule 10B-5.” Columbia Law Review 108 (2008): 1301–1364.Google Scholar

Rose, Amanda M. “The Multienforcer Approach to Securities Fraud Deterrence: A Critical Analysis.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 158 (2010): 2173–2232.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Gerald N. “Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power.” Review of Politics 54 (1992): 369–398.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Gerald N. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Rosin, Hanna. The End of Men: And the Rise of Women. New York: Riverhead Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Rubenstein, William B. “On What a ‘Private Attorney General’ Is – and Why It Matters.” Vanderbilt Law Review 57 (2004): 2129–2173.Google Scholar

Rutherglen, George. Civil Rights in the Shadow of Slavery: The Constitution: Common Law, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H.. “Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds.” Harvard Law Review 117 (2004): 1016–1101.Google Scholar

Salop, Steven C., and White, Lawrence J.. “Treble Damages Reform: Implications of the Georgetown Project.” Antitrust Law Journal 55 (1986): 73–94.Google Scholar

Sandberg, Sheryl. Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York: Knopf, 2013.Google Scholar

Sandefur, Rebecca L. “Embrace Disciplinarity and Talk across It.” Law & Society Review 50 (2016): 34–39.Google Scholar

Sandler, Ross, and Schoenbrod, David. Democracy by Decree: What Happens When Courts Run Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Savage, David G. Turning Right: The Making of the Rehnquist Court. New York: Wiley, 1993.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, and Zeckhauser, Richard. “The Trouble with Cases.” In Regulation Versus Litigation, edited by Kessler, Daniel P., 45–70. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar

SchebII, John M., and Lyons, William. “The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly 81 (2000): 928–940.Google Scholar

Scheingold, Stuart A. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Schlanger, Margo, and Kim, Pauline. “The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Structural Reform of the American Workplace.” Washington University Law Review 91 (2014): 1519–1590.Google Scholar

Schlozman, Daniel. When Movements Anchor Parties: Electoral Alignments in American History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Schwemm, Robert G. “Private Enforcement and the Fair Housing Act.” Yale Law and Policy Review 6 (1988): 375–384.Google Scholar

Schwemm, Robert G. “The Future of Fair Housing Litigation.” John Marshall Law Review 26 (1993): 745–773.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Ari. Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in Modern America. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2014.Google Scholar

Sharkey, Patrick. Stuck in Place: Urban Neighborhoods and the End of Progress toward Racial Equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Selmi, Michael. “Public vs. Private Enforcement of Civil Rights: The Case of Housing and Employment.” UCLA Law Review 45 (1997): 1401–1459.Google Scholar

Selmi, Michael. “The Value of the EEOC: Reexamining the Agency’s Role in Employment Discrimination Law.” Ohio State Law Journal 57 (1996): 1–64.Google Scholar

Selmi, Michael. “Why Are Employment Cases So Difficult to Win?” 61 Louisiana Law Review (2001): 555–575.Google Scholar

Selmi, Michael. “Was Disparate Impact Theory a Mistake?” University of California Los Angeles Law Review 43(2006): 701–782.Google Scholar

Selmi, Michael. “The Supreme Court’s Surprising and Strategic Response to the Civil Rights Act of 1991.” Wake Forest Law Review 46 (2011): 281–306.Google Scholar

Seron, Carroll. “The Two Faces of Law and Inequality: From Critique to the Promise of Situated, Pragmatic Policy.” Law & Society Review 50 (2016): 9–33.Google Scholar

Shavell, Steven. “The Fundamental Divergence between the Private and the Social Motive to Use the Legal System.” Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1997): 575–612.Google Scholar

Shoben, Elaine W. “Disparate Impact Theory in Employment Discrimination: What’s Griggs Still Good For? What Not?” Brandeis Law Journal 42 (2004): 597–622.Google Scholar

Short, Jodi. “Creating Peer Sexual Harassment: Mobilizing Schools to Throw the Book at Themselves.” Law & Policy 28 (2006): 31–59.Google Scholar

Siegel, Andrew. “The Court against the Courts: Hostility to Litigation as an Organizing Theme in the Rehnquist Court’s Jurisprudence.” Texas Law Review 84 (2006): 1097–1202.Google Scholar

Siegel, Reva B. “Introduction: A Short History of Sexual Harassment.” In Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, edited by MacKinnon, Catharine and Siegel, Reva, 1–39. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Gordon. Law’s Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Skaggs, Sheryl. “Producing Change or Bagging Opportunity? The Effects of Discrimination Litigation on Women in Supermarket Management.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (2008): 1148–1182.Google Scholar

Skowronek, Stephen. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Skrentny, John David. The Ironies of Affirmative Action: Politics, Culture, and Justice in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Skrentny, John David. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Skrentny, John David. 2015. After Civil Rights: Racial Realism in the American Workplace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Slotnick, Elliot, Goldman, Sheldon, and Schiavoni, Sara. “Writing the Book of Judges, Part 1: Obama’s Judicial Appointments Record after Six Years.” Journal of Law and Courts (2015): 331–367.Google Scholar

Slotnick, Elliot, Goldman, Sheldon, and Schiavoni, Sara. “Writing the Book of Judges, Part 2: Confirmation Politics in the 113th Congress.” Journal of Law and Courts (2016): 187–242.Google Scholar

Smith, Reginald Heber. Justice and the Poor. New York: Carnegie Foundation, 1919.Google Scholar

Smith, Robert Samuel. Race, Labor and Civil Rights: Griggs v. Duke Power and the Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Smith, Rogers M. “New Institutionalism and the Future of Public Law.” American Political Science Review 82 (1988): 89–108.Google Scholar

Smith, Rogers M. “Historical Institutionalism and the Study of Law.” In The Oxford Handbook on Law and Courts, edited by Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldiera, Gregory A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Soss, Joe. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93 (1999): 363–380.Google Scholar

Southworth, Ann. Lawyers on the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Sovern, Michael I. Legal Restraints on Racial Discrimination in Employment. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Spence, David B. “Managing Delegation Ex Ante: Using Law to Steer Administrative Agencies.” Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1999): 413–460.Google Scholar

Sperino, Sandra F. “Beyond McDonnell Douglas.” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 34 (2013): 257–272.Google Scholar

Sperino, Sandra F. “Discrimination Law: The New Franken-Tort.” DePaul Law Review 65(2016): 721–753.Google Scholar

Stainback, Kevin, and Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald. Documenting Desegregation: Racial and Gender Segregation in Private Sector Employment since the Civil Rights Act. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2012.Google Scholar

Staszak, Sarah. “Institutions, Rulemaking, and the Politics of Judicial Retrenchment.” Studies in American Political Development 24 (2010): 168–189.Google Scholar

Staszak, Sarah. “Realizing the Rights Revolution: Litigation and the American State.” Law and Social Inquiry 38 (2013): 222–245.Google Scholar

Staszak, Sarah. No Day in Court: Access to Justice and the Politics of Judicial Retrenchment. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Stein, Michael Ashley. “Same Struggle, Different Difference: ADA Accommodations as Antidiscrimination.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 153 (2004): 579–673.Google Scholar

Stephenson, Matthew C. “Public Regulation of Private Enforcement: The Case for Expanding the Role of Administrative Agencies.” Virginia Law Review 91 (2005): 93–174.Google Scholar

Stephenson, Matthew C. “Legislative Allocation of Delegated Power: Uncertainty, Risk, and the Choice between Agencies and Courts.” Harvard Law Review 119 (2006): 1035–1070.Google Scholar

StewartJr., Joseph, and Heck, Edward V.. “The Day-to-Day Activities of Interest Group Lawyers.” Social Science Quarterly 64 (1983): 173–182.Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B., and Sunstein, Cass R.. “Public Programs and Private Rights.” Harvard Law Review 95 (1982): 1193–1322.Google Scholar

Stone, Christopher D. Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.Google Scholar

Sturm, Susan. “Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach.” Columbia Law Review 101 (2001): 458–568.Google Scholar

Subrin, Steven N., and Yoo, Margaret Y. K., Litigating in America: Civil Procedure in Context. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2006.Google Scholar

Suk, Julie Chi-hye. “Antidiscrimination Law in the Administrative State.” University of Illinois Law Review 2006 (2006): 405–474.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., and Vermeule, Adrian. “The Unbearable Rightness of Auer.” University of Chicago Law Review (2017): 291–321.Google Scholar