Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ahl, Björn 2018. The Politicization of the Chinese National Judicial Examination, 2007–2012. Modern China, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 208.

    May, Chris 2016. The indeterminacy of the rule of law: what shapes the ideas by which judges rule?. Global Discourse, Vol. 6, Issue. 1-2, p. 292.

    Ahl, Björn and Tieben, Hendrik 2015. Modern Chinese Court Buildings, Regime Legitimacy and the Public. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 603.

    Bowen, Rachel E. 2013. Judicial Autonomy in Central America. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 66, Issue. 4, p. 831.

    Schedler, Andreas 2009. The New Institutionalism in the Study of Authoritarian Regimes. Totalitarianism and Democracy, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 323.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: June 2012

13 - Courts in Authoritarian Regimes

Summary

THE EXPANSION OF JUDICIAL STUDIES

This project represents something of a high watermark in the study of law and courts in general and judicial review in particular. Not so very long ago nearly every student of the politics of law and courts concentrated on the constitutional decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. The very preoccupation with constitutional judicial review has led, in recent years, to more study of lands beyond the United States as constitutional courts and constitutional judicial review, or something very like it, spread to other democratic regimes, particularly after World War II. What once appeared to be a piece of American exceptionalism came into play in most European, continental, democratic states; and in the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights; in more and more English-speaking countries; and in some Asian democratic states. Overseas realities eventually forced scholars to go beyond their American preoccupations.

At the same time, the very concerns with the politics of law and courts, or the judicial role in politics, that had so dramatically called our attention to the constitutional law of the U.S. Supreme Court and then to other constitutional law and courts eventually lead us to nonconstitutional courts of law, because it could hardly be denied that all sorts of American and foreign courts made significant public policy decisions in all sorts of cases involving all sorts of law.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Rule by Law
  • Online ISBN: 9780511814822
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814822
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×