Adorno, Theodor W. Philosophy of New Music, trans., ed. and with an introduction by Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Auner, Joseph. “Schoenberg’s Aesthetic Transformations and the Evolution of Form in Die glückliche Hand,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute 12/2 (November 1989): 103–28.Google Scholar

Auner, Joseph. A Schoenberg Reader: Documents of a Life. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bailey, Kathryn. Composing with Tones: A Musical Analysis of Schoenberg’s Op. 23 Pieces for Piano. London: Royal Musical Association, 2001.Google Scholar

Bailey, Kathryn. “Formal Organization and Structural Imagery in Schoenberg’s Pierrot lunaire,” Studies in Music from the University of Western Ontario 2/1 (1977): 93–107.Google Scholar

Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. “Structural Imagery: Pierrot lunaire Revisited,” Tempo 60/237 (2006): 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkin, Elaine. “Play it AS it Lays,” Perspectives of New Music 17/2 (Spring-Summer 1979): 17–24.Google Scholar

Barkin, Elaine “(a song of ing),” In Theory Only 6/1 (November 1981): 40.Google Scholar

Barkin, Elaine Untitled essay (on Schoenberg’s Opus 19, No. 6), In Theory Only 4/8 (February-March 1979): 18–26.Google Scholar

Benjamin, William. “Abstract Polyphonies: The Music of Schoenberg’s Nietzschean Moment,” in Political and Religious Ideas in the Works of Arnold Schoenberg, ed. Cross, Charlotte M. and Berman, Russell A.. New York: Garland, 2000, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar

Berger, Arthur. “Problems of Pitch Organization in Stravinsky,” Perspectives of New Music 2/1 (1963): 11–42.Google Scholar

Boge, Claire. “Poetic Analysis as Part of Analysis Pedagogy,” In Theory Only 12/3–4 (1992): 47–67.Google Scholar

Boss, Jack. “‘Away with Motivic Working’? Not So Fast: Motivic Processes in Schoenberg’s Op. 11, No. 3,” Music Theory Online 21/3 (September 2015). www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.15.21.3/mto.15.21.3.boss.html.Google Scholar

Boss, Jack “The Musical Idea and the Basic Image in an Atonal Song and Recitation of Arnold Schoenberg,” Gamut 2/1 (2009): 223–66.Google Scholar

Boss, Jack “‘Musical Idea’ and Motivic Structure in Schoenberg’s Op. 11, No. 1,” in Musical Currents from the Left Coast, ed. Boss, Jack and Quaglia, Bruce. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2008, pp. 258–83.Google Scholar

Boss, Jack “Schoenberg’s Op. 22 Radio Talk and Developing Variation in Atonal Music,” Music Theory Spectrum 14/2 (Fall 1992): 125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boss, Jack “Schoenberg on Ornamentation and Structural Levels,” Journal of Music Theory 38/2 (Fall 1994): 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boss, Jack Schoenberg’s Twelve-Tone Music: Symmetry and the Musical Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, Reinhold. Arnold Schönberg, Drei Klavierstücke Op. 11: Studien zur Frühen Atonalität bei Schönberg, vol. 7 of Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1969.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, Reinhold “The Fool as Paradigm: Schoenberg’s Pierrot lunaire and the Modern Artist,” in Schoenberg and Kandinsky: An Historic Encounter. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic, 1997, pp. 139–68.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, Reinhold “The Lyric as Paradigm: Poetry and the Foundation of Arnold Schoenberg’s New Music,” in German Literature in Music: An Aesthetic Fusion: 1890–1989, ed. Reschke, Claus and Pollack, Howard. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1992, pp. 95–129.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Herbert H. “A Key to Schoenberg’s Erwartung (op. 17),” Journal of the American Musicological Society 20/3 (Autumn 1967): 434–49.Google Scholar

Burkholder, J. Peter. All Made of Tunes: Charles Ives and the Uses of Musical Borrowing. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Busoni, Ferruccio. Ferruccio Busoni: Selected Letters, trans., ed., and with an introduction by Beaumont, Antony. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Cherlin, Michael. “Pierrot Lunaire as Lunar Nexus,” Music Analysis 31/2 (2012): 176–215.Google Scholar

Cherlin, Michael “Schoenberg and Das Unheimliche: Spectres of Tonality,” Journal of Musicology 11/3 (Summer 1993): 357–73.Google Scholar

Cherlin, Michael Schoenberg’s Musical Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas. “Schoenberg’s Opus 11, No. 1: A Parody of Pitch Cells from Tristan,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute 10/1 (June 1987): 38–44.Google Scholar

Cinnamon, Howard. “Tonal Elements and Unfolding Nontriadic Harmonies in the Second of Schoenberg’s Drei Klavierstücke, Op. 11,” Theory and Practice 18/2 (1993): 127–70.Google Scholar

Cogan, Robert and Escot, Pozzi. Sonic Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976.Google Scholar

Dahlhaus, Carl. Nineteenth-Century Music, trans. J. Bradford Robinson. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

DeLio, Thomas. “Language and Form in an Early Atonal Composition: Schoenberg’s Op. 19/2,” Indiana Theory Review 15/2 (Fall 1994): 17–40.Google Scholar

Domek, Richard. “Some Aspects of Organization in Schoenberg’s Book of the Hanging Gardens, Opus 15,” College Music Symposium 19/2 (Fall 1979): 111–28.Google Scholar

Dunsby, Jonathan. Schoenberg: Pierrot lunaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Dunsby, Jonathan and Whittall, Arnold. Music Analysis in Theory and Practice. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Falck, Robert. “‘Fear and Hope’: A Look at Schoenberg’s Op. 15, No. VII,” Canadian Association of University Schools of Music Journal 7 (1977): 91–105.Google Scholar

Forte, Allen. “Concepts of Linearity in Schoenberg’s Atonal Music: A Study of the Opus 15 Song Cycle,” Journal of Music Theory 36/2 (1992): 285–382.Google Scholar

Forte, Allen “Context and Continuity in an Atonal Work,” Perspectives of New Music 1/2 (Spring 1963): 72–82.Google Scholar

Forte, Allen “The Magical Kaleidoscope: Schoenberg’s First Atonal Masterwork, Opus 11, Number 1,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute 5/2 (1981): 127–68.Google Scholar

Forte, Allen The Structure of Atonal Music. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Frisch, Walter. The Early Works of Arnold Schoenberg, 1893–1908. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

George, Stefan. The Works of Stefan George Rendered into English, trans. Olga Marx and Ernst Morwitz. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Jan. “Schoenberg’s Harmonic Visions: A Study of Text Painting in ‘Die Kreuze’,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute 8/2 (1984): 116–30.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Ulrich K. Stefan George: A Study of His Early Work. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Gostomsky, Dieter. “Tonalität – Atonalität: Zur Harmonik von Schönbergs Klavierstück Op. 11, Nr. 1,” Zeitschrift für Musiktheorie 7/1 (1976): 54–71.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Matthew. “Dialectic in Miniature: Arnold Schoenberg’s Sechs Kleine Klavierstücke Op. 19,” Ex Tempore 14/2 (Spring-Summer 2009): 42–59.Google Scholar

Guck, Marion. “A noir – à miroir: Past Senses Reverses Nests (A Priori?),” In Theory Only 2/10 (January 1977): 29–34.Google Scholar

Haimo, Ethan. “Atonality, Analysis and the Intentional Fallacy,” Music Theory Spectrum 18/2 (Fall 1996): 167–99.Google Scholar

Haimo, Ethan “Schoenberg’s Pierrot Lunaire: A Cycle?,” in Pierrot Lunaire: Giraud/Hartleben/Schoenberg, ed. Delaere, Mark and Herman, Jan. Louvain: Peeters, 2014, pp. 145–55.Google Scholar

Haimo, Ethan Schoenberg’s Serial Odyssey: The Evolution of his Twelve-Tone Method. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Haimo, Ethan Schoenberg’s Transformation of Musical Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hamao, Fusako. “On the Origin of the Twelve-Tone Method: Schoenberg’s Sketches for the Unfinished Symphony (1914–1915),” Current Musicology 42 (1986): 32–45.Google Scholar

Harrison, Daniel. Pieces of Tradition: An Analysis of Contemporary Tonal Music. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Heneghan, Áine. “Schoenberg’s Compositional Philosophy, the Three Piano Pieces, and his Subsequent Volte-Face,” in Musical Currents from the Left Coast, ed. Boss, Jack and Quaglia, Bruce. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2008, pp. 299–314.Google Scholar

Hicken, Kenneth. “Tonal Organization in Schoenberg’s Six Little Piano Pieces, Op. 19,” Canadian University Music Review 1 (1980): 130–46.Google Scholar

Hyde, Martha. “Musical Form and the Development of Schoenberg’s Twelve-Tone Method,” Journal of Music Theory 29/1 (Spring 1985): 85–143.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. Daniel. “Schoenberg’s Concept of ‘ruhende Bewegung’,” Theory and Practice 34 (2009): 87–105.Google Scholar

Knight, Russell C. “Operand Set Theory and Schoenberg’s Erwartung, Op. 17,” PhD dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara, 2008.Google Scholar

Kurth, Richard. “Pierrot lunaire: Persona, Voice, and the Fabric of Allusion,” in The Cambridge Companion to Schoenberg, ed. Shaw, Jennifer and Auner, Joseph. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 120–34.Google Scholar

Kurth, Richard. “Pierrot’s Cave: Representation, Reverberation, Radiance,” in Schoenberg and Words: The Modernist Years, ed. Cross, Charlotte M. and Berman, Russell A.. New York: Garland, 2000, pp. 203–41.Google Scholar

Larson, Steve. “A Tonal Model of an ‘Atonal’ Piece: Schönberg’s Opus 15, Number 2,” Perspectives of New Music 25/1–2 (Winter–Summer 1987): 418–33.Google Scholar

Leichtentritt, Hugo. Musical Form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Lerdahl, Fred. “Atonal Prolongational Structure,” Contemporary Music Review 4 (1989): 65–87.Google Scholar

Lessem, Alan. Music and Text in the Works of Arnold Schoenberg. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Lessem, Alan “Text and Music in Schoenberg’s Pierrot Lunaire,” Current Musicology 19 (1975): 103–12.Google Scholar

Lewandowski, Stephan. “‘A Far Higher Power,’ Gedanken zu ideengeschichtlichen Vorgängermodellen der Pitch-Class Set Theory,” Tijdschrift voor Muziektheorie 15/3 (2010): 190–210.Google Scholar

Lewin, David. “Inversional Balance as an Organizing Force in Schoenberg’s Music and Thought,” Perspectives of New Music 6/2 (Spring–Summer 1968): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewin, David. “Klumpenhouwer Networks and Some Isographies that Involve Them,” Music Theory Spectrum 12/1 (Spring 1990): 83–120.Google Scholar

Lewin, David. “Re: The Intervallic Content of a Collection of Notes, Intervallic Relations between a Collection of Notes and Its Complement: An Application to Schoenberg’s Hexachordal Pieces,” Journal of Music Theory 4/1 (Spring 1960): 98–101.Google Scholar

Lewin, David. “Some Investigations into Foreground Rhythmic and Metric Patterning,” in Music Theory: Special Topics, ed. Browne, Richmond. New York: Academic Press, 1981, pp. 101–37.Google Scholar

Lewin, David. “Some Notes on Pierrot Lunaire,” in Music Theory in Concept and Practice, ed. Baker, James M., Beach, David W., and Bernard, Jonathan W.. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 1997, pp. 433–57.Google Scholar

Lewin, David. “Some Notes on Schoenberg’s Opus 11,” In Theory Only 3/1 (April 1977): 3–7.Google Scholar

Lewin, David. “Toward the Analysis of a Schoenberg Song (Op. 15, No. XI),” Perspectives of New Music 12/1–2 (1973–74): 43–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewin, David. “Transformational Techniques in Atonal and Other Music Theories,” Perspectives of New Music 21/1–2 (Autumn 1982–Summer 1983): 312–71.Google Scholar

Lewin, David. “A Tutorial on Klumpenhouwer Networks, Using the Chorale in Schoenberg’s Opus 11, No. 2,” Journal of Music Theory 38/1 (Spring 1994): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewin, David. “A Way into Schoenberg’s Opus 15, Number 7,” In Theory Only 6/1 (November 1981): 3–24.Google Scholar

Lubet, Alex. “Vestiges of Tonality in a Work of Arnold Schoenberg,” Indiana Theory Review 5/3 (Spring 1982): 11–21.Google Scholar

Maegaard, Jan. Studien zur Entwicklung des dodekaphonen Satzes bei Arnold Schönberg, 3 vols. Copenhagen: Wilhelm Hansen, 1972.Google Scholar

Mailman, Joshua Banks. “Schoenberg’s Chordal Experimentalism Revealed through Representional Hierarchy Association (RHA), Contour Motives, and Binary-State Switching,” Music Theory Spectrum 37/2 (Fall 2015): 224–52.Google Scholar

Marsh, Roger. “‘A Multicolored Alphabet’: Rediscovering Albert Giraud’s Pierrot Lunaire,” Twentieth-Century Music 4/1: 97–121.Google Scholar

McKee, Eric. “On the Death of Mahler: Schoenberg’s Op. 19, No. 6,” Theory and Practice 30 (2005): 121–51.Google Scholar

Morrison, Charles. “Syncopation as Motive in Schoenberg’s Op. 19, Nos. 2, 3 and 4,” Music Analysis 11/1 (1992): 75–93.Google Scholar

Neidhöfer, Christoph. “Atonalität und Transformational Analysis: Zu einigen verborgenen (und nicht so verborgenen) Strukturen in Schönbergs Klavierstück op. 11, 3,” in Jahrbuch 2008/09 des Staatlichen Instituts für Musikforschung Preußischer Kulturbesitz, ed. Hohmaier, Simone. Mainz: Schott, 2009, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar

Norton, Robert E. Secret Germany: Stefan George and His Circle. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Ogdon, Will. “How Tonality Functions in Schoenberg’s Opus 11, Number 1,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute 5/2 (1981): 169–81.Google Scholar

Payette, Jessica. “Seismographic Screams: Erwartung’s Reverberations through Twentieth-Century Culture,” PhD dissertation, Stanford University, 2008.Google Scholar

Perle, George. Serial Composition and Atonality. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Raessler, Daniel M. “Schoenberg and Busoni: Aspects of Their Relationship,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute 7/1 (1983): 7–27.Google Scholar

Raff, Christian. Gestaltete Freiheit: Studien zur Analyse der frei atonalen Kompositionen A. Schönbergs – auf der Grundlage seiner Begriffe, Sinefonia, vol. 5. Hofheim: Wolke, 2006.Google Scholar

Reich, Willi. Schoenberg: A Critical Biography, trans. Leo Black. New York: Praeger, 1971.Google Scholar

Roig-Francolí, Miguel A. “A Theory of Pitch-Class Set Extension in Atonal Music,” College Music Symposium 41 (2001): 57–90.Google Scholar

Schmalfeldt, Janet. Berg’s Wozzeck: Harmonic Language and Dramatic Design. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Arnold. “Analysis of the Four Orchestral Songs Op. 22,” trans. Claudio Spies, Perspectives of New Music 3/2 (Spring–Summer 1965): 1–21.Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Arnold. Arnold Schönberg, Fünfzehn Gedichte aus “Das Buch der hängenden Gärten” von Stefan George, für Gesang und Klavier, with afterword by Theodor W. Adorno. Wiesbaden: Insel-Bücherei no. 683, 1959.Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Arnold. Berliner Tagebuch, ed. Rufer, Josef. Frankfurt: Propyläen, 1974.Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Arnold. Fundamentals of Musical Composition, 2nd edn, ed. Strang, Gerald and Stein, Leonard. London: Faber & Faber, 1970.Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Arnold. Pierrot lunaire, Op. 21, The Book of the Hanging Gardens, Op. 15, with Jan DeGaetani, mezzo-soprano, The Contemporary Chamber Ensemble, Arthur Weisberg, conductor, and Gilbert Kalish, piano, © 1990 by Elektra Nonesuch, Elektra Nonesuch 9–79237-2, compact disc.Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Arnold. Structural Functions of Harmony, rev. ed. Stein, Leonard. New York: Norton, 1969.Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Arnold. Style and Idea: Selected Writings of Arnold Schoenberg, rev. paperback edn, ed. Stein, Leonard, trans. Leo Black. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984. Includes: “Composition with Twelve Tones (1)” (1941), “Hauer’s Theories” (1923), “Linear Counterpoint” (1931), “New Music: My Music” (c. 1930), “New Music, Outmoded Music, Style and Idea” (1946), “On revient toujours” (1948), “Problems of Harmony” (1934), “The Relationship to the Text” (1912).Google Scholar

Schoenberg, Arnold. Theory of Harmony, trans. Roy E. Carter. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Simms, Bryan. The Atonal Music of Arnold Schoenberg, 1908–1923. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Stein, Deborah. “Schoenberg’s Opus 19, No. 2: Voice-Leading and Overall Structure in an Atonal Work,” In Theory Only 2/7 (October 1976): 27–43.Google Scholar

Steuermann, Eduard. “Pierrot Lunaire in Retrospect,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute 2/1 (October 1977): 49–51.Google Scholar

Straus, Joseph N. Introduction to Post-Tonal Theory, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall, 2004.Google Scholar

Straus, Joseph N. Introduction to Post-Tonal Theory, 4th edn. New York: Norton, 2016.Google Scholar

Straus, Joseph N. “Voice Leading in Set-Class Space,” Journal of Music Theory 49/1 (Spring 2005): 45–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stuckenschmidt, Hans Heinz. “Opus 19, Nummer 3: Eine Schönberg-Analyse,” Orbis musicae 1/1 (Summer 1971): 88–90.Google Scholar

Stuckenschmidt, Hans Heinz Schoenberg: His Life, World and Work, trans. Humphrey Searle. New York: Schirmer Books, 1978.Google Scholar

Theurich, Jutta. “Der Briefwechsel zwischen Arnold Schönberg und Ferruccio Busoni,” in Arnold Schönberg – 1874 bis 1951: Zum 25. Todestag des Komponisten, ed. Hansen, Mathias and Müller, Christa. Berlin: Akademie der Künste der DDR, 1976, pp. 55–58.Google Scholar

Travis, Roy. “Directed Motion in Schoenberg and Webern,” Perspectives of New Music 4/2 (Spring–Summer 1966): 85–89.Google Scholar

Tymoczko, Dmitri. A Geometry of Music: Harmony and Counterpoint in the Extended Common Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Väisälä, Olli. “Concepts of Harmony and Prolongation in Schoenberg’s Op. 19/2,” Music Theory Spectrum 21/2 (Fall 1999): 230–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van den Toorn, Pieter. The Music of Igor Stravinsky. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Vilain, Robert. “Pierrot Lunaire: Cyclic Coherence in Giraud and Schoenberg,” in Pierrot Lunaire: Giraud/Hartleben/Schoenberg, ed. Delaere, Mark and Herman, Jan. Louvain: Peeters, 2014, pp. 127–44.Google Scholar

von Massow, Albrecht. “Abschied und Neuorientierung – Schönbergs Klavierstück op. 19, 6,” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 50/2 (1993): 187–95.Google Scholar

von der Nüll, Edwin. Moderne Harmonik. Leipzig: F. Kistner & C. F. W. Siegel, 1932.Google Scholar

Wen, Eric. “Bass-Line Articulations of the Urlinie,” in Schenker Studies 2, ed. Schachter, Carl and Siegel, Hedi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 276–97.Google Scholar

Weytjens, Stephan. “Text as a Crutch in Arnold Schoenberg’s ‘Pierrot lunaire’ Op. 21?” PhD dissertation, University of Leuven, 2003.Google Scholar

Weytjens, Stephan “Text as a Crutch in Schoenberg’s Pierrot Lunaire?” in Pierrot Lunaire: Giraud/Hartleben/Schoenberg, ed. Delaere, Mark and Herman, Jan. Louvain: Peeters, 2014, pp. 109–24.Google Scholar

Whitney, Kathryn. “Schoenberg’s ‘Single Second of Maximum Spiritual Excitement’: Compression and Expansion in ‘Erwartung,’ Op. 17,” Journal of Music Theory 47/1 (Spring, 2003): 155–214.Google Scholar

Williams, Edgar Warren Jr.. “A View of Schoenberg’s Op. 19, No. 2,” College Music Symposium 25 (1985): 144–51.Google Scholar

Youens, Susan. “Excavating an Allegory: The Texts of Pierrot Lunaire,” Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute 8/2 (1984): 94–115.Google Scholar