Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Egmose, Ida and Køppe, Simo 2018. Shaping of Reach-to-Grasp Kinematics by Intentions: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, Vol. 50, Issue. 2, p. 155.

    Reader, Arran T. and Holmes, Nicholas P. 2015. Video stimuli reduce object-directed imitation accuracy: a novel two-person motion-tracking approach. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6, Issue. ,

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: December 2009

2 - Kinematic assessment of grasping

Summary

Summary

Research on grasping kinematics has proved to be particularly insightful in revealing important aspects of the motor control and selection processes underlying the control of hand action. The aim of this chapter is to provide a synthetic overview of the main kinematic techniques which have been utilized for describing and quantifying grasping movements. The first part of the chapter includes a brief description of the basic kinematic principles. The second part focuses on the main techniques used to perform kinematic analysis of grasping movements. Specifically, it describes video, optoelectronic, and sensor bending techniques. The third part is concerned with a brief review of studies which have characterized the kinematics of grasping not only in healthy adults but also in developmental, neuropsychological and comparative research. We conclude the chapter by discussing recent research issues and technical approaches which have recently started to emerge.

Introduction

Interest in the kinematic analysis of grasping was largely stimulated by the work of Marc Jeannerod who identified how specific kinematic landmarks modulate with respect to object properties to allow for both successful hand positioning and object grasping (Jeannerod, 1981, 1984). Since these early observations, this movement has been well characterized in those with no neurological damage. For subjects with central nervous system damage kinematic assessment allows a complete description of dysfunction and consequently assists with diagnosis and design of appropriate therapeutic regimes.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Sensorimotor Control of Grasping
  • Online ISBN: 9780511581267
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581267
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Allard, P., Stokes, I. A. F. & Blanchi, J. P. (Eds.) (1995). Three-dimensional Analysis of Human Movement. Human Kinetics, USA.
Ansuini, C., Santello, M., Massaccesi, S. & Castiello, U. (2006). Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. J Neurophysiol, 95, 2456–2465.
Ansuini, C., Tognin, V., Turella, L. & Castiello, U. (2007). Distractor objects affect fingers' angular distances but not fingers' shaping during grasping. Exp Brain Res, 178, 194–205.
Becchio, C., Sartori, L., Bulgheroni, M. & Castiello, U. (2007). The case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: a kinematic study on social intention. Conscious Cogn, Epub ahead of print.
Becchio, C., Sartori, L., Bulgheroni, M. & Castiello, U. (2008). Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach to grasp movement. Cognition, 106, 894–912.
Begliomini, C., Wall, M. B., Smith, A. T. & Castiello, U. (2007). Differential cortical activity for precision and whole-hand visually guided grasping in humans. Eur J Neurosci, 25, 1245–1252.
Bootsma, R. J., Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L. & Zaal, F. T. J. M. (1994). The speed-accuracy trade off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics. Exp Brain Res, 98, 535–541.
Cappozzo, A., Catani, F., Croce, U. D. & Leardini, A. (1996). Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin Biomech, 2, 90–100.
Castiello, U. (2003). Understanding other people's actions: intention and attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 29, 416–430.
Castiello, U. (2005). The neuroscience of grasping. Nat Rev Neurosci, 6, 726–736.
Cattaneo, L., Voss, M., Brochier, T.et al. (2005). A cortico-cortical mechanism mediating object-driven grasp in humans. Proc Nat Ac Sci, 102, 898–903.
Christel, M. I., & Billard, A. (2002). Comparison between macaques' and humans' kinematics of prehension: the role of morphological differences and control mechanisms. Behav Brain Res, 131, 169–184.
Davare, M., Andres, M., Cosnard, G., Thonnard, J. L. & Olivier, E. (2006). Dissociating the role of ventral and dorsal premotor cortex in precision grasping. J Neurosci, 26, 2260–2268.
Ehara, Y., Fujimoto, H., Miyazaki, S.et al. (1997). Comparison of the performance of 3D camera systems. Gait Posture, 5, 251–255.
Fuller, J., Liu, L. J., Murphy, M. C. & Mann, R. W. (1997). A comparison of lower extremity skeletal kinematics measured with pin- and skin-mounted markers. Human Movement Sci, 16, 219–242.
Gardner, E. P., Debowy, D. J., Ro, J. Y., Ghosh, S. & Babu, K. S. (2002). Sensory monitoring of prehension in the parietal lobe: a study using digital video. Behav Brain Res, 135, 213–224.
Georgiou, I., Becchio, C., Glover, S. & Castiello, U. (2007). Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour. Cognition, 102, 415–433.
Glover, S., Miall, R. C. & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2005). Parietal rTMS selectively disrupts the initiation of on-line adjustments to a perturbation of object size. J Cogn Neurosci, 17, 124–136.
Gordon, A. M., Forssberg, H., Johansson, R. S. & Westling, G. (1991). The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip. Exp Brain Res, 83, 483–488.
Jakobson, L. S. & Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res, 86, 199–208.
Jakobson, L. S., Archibald, Y., Carey, D. & Goodale, M. A. (1991). A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, 29, 803–809.
Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In Long, J. & Baddeley, A. (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX (pp. 153–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav, 16, 235–254.
Jeannerod, M. (1986). Mechanisms of visuomotor coordination: a study in normal and brain-damaged subjects. Neuropsychologia, 24, 41–78.
Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J. P., Stolze, H., Boczek-Funcke, A. & Illert, M. (1998). Development of prehension movements in children: a kinematic study. Exp Brain Res, 122, 424–432.
Mason, C. R., Theverapperuma, L. S., Hendrix, C. M. & Ebner, T. J. (2004). Monkey hand postural synergies during reach-to-grasp in the absence of vision of the hand and object. J Neurophysiol, 91, 2826–2837.
Raghavan, P., Santello, M., Krakauer, J. W. & Gordon, A. M. (2006). Shaping the hand to object contours after stroke. The control of fingertip position during whole hand grasping. Soc Neurosci Abst, 655, 14.
Raos, V., Umiltà, M. A., Murata, A., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (2006). Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol, 95, 709–729.
Rice, N. J., Valyear, K. F., Goodale, M., Milner, A. D. & Culham, J. C. (2007). Orientation sensitivity to graspable objects: an fMRI adaptation study. Neuroimage, 36 (Suppl. 2), T87–T93.
Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Farnè, A., Jouffrais, C. & Boussaoud, D. (2000). Hand kinematics during reaching and grasping in the macaque monkey. Behav Brain Res, 117, 75–82.
Santello, M. & Soechting, J. F. (1998). Gradual molding of the hand to object contours. J Neurophysiol, 79, 1307–1320.
Savelsbergh, G. J. P., Steenbergen, B. & Kamp, J. (1996). The role of fragility information in the guidance of the precision grip. Hum Mov Sci, 15, 115–127.
Schettino, L. F., Adamovich, S. V. & Poizner, H. (2003). Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping. Exp Brain Res, 151, 158–166.
Schettino, L. F., Adamovich, S. V., Hening, W.et al. (2006). Hand preshaping in Parkinson's disease: effects of visual feedback and medication state. Exp Brain Res, 168, 186–202.
Smeets, J. B. & Brenner, E. (1999). A new view on grasping. Mot Control, 3, 237–271.
Tunik, E., Frey, S. H. & Grafton, S. T. (2005). Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci, 8, 505–511.
Hofsten, C. & Rönnqvist, L. (1988). Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 14, 610–621.
Weir, P. L., MacKenzie, C. L., Marteniuk, R. G. & Cargoe, S. L. (1991a). Is object texture a constraint on human prehension? Kinematic evidence. J Mot Behav, 23, 205–210.
Weir, P. L., MacKenzie, C. L., Marteniuk, R. G., Cargoe, S. L. & Fraser, M. B. (1991b). The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension. J Mot Behav, 23, 192–204.
Winter, D. A. (1991). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 2nd edn. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
Zoia, S., Pezzetta, E., Blason, L.et al. (2006). A comparison of the reach-to-grasp movement between children and adults: a kinematic study. Dev Neuropsychol, 30, 719–738.