Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:19:52.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Sex ratios of parasitic Hymenoptera with unusual life-histories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Paul J. Ode
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Beneficial Insects Introduction Research, University of Delaware, USA
Martha S. Hunter
Affiliation:
Dept. of Entomology, 410 Forbes Building, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
Ian C. W. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

Summary

Hymenopteran parasitoids have proven to be exceptionally good organisms with which to test sex-allocation theory because their sex allocation is extremely labile. Sex allocation is frequently under maternal control,allowing mothers to adjust sex-allocation decisions in response to a variety of environmental conditions. Species with unusual life-histories can provide unique tests of sex-allocation theory either because maternal control over sex-allocation decisions is reduced relative to offspring control, or because the costs of producing male and female offspring differ. We consider three groups of parasitoids that are atypical in some aspect of their life-history: (1) polyembryonic species, which are unusual in that offspring may control the final sex ratio and clutch size; (2) heteronomous species, in which the sexes are generally placed in different hosts; and the balance between egg and host limitation may influence sex allocation; and (3) single-sex brood producing species, in which host versus egg limitation also influences sex ratios and which provide insight into the role of kin selection in the evolution of clutch size and sex ratios. We argue that these groups provide invaluable insights into sex-allocation behaviour by challenging the framework with which we interpret sex ratios of more typical parasitoids.

‘Usual’ life-histories, and the exception

Parasitic wasps have been favoured organisms for the study of sex ratios precisely because they are considered by many to have unusual life-histories. Indeed, observations of sex-allocation patterns in parasitic Hymenoptera have contributed greatly to the development of sex ratio theory (e.g. effects of local mate competition, Hamilton 1967; effects of spatial variation in resource quality, Charnov 1979, Charnov et al. 1981).

Type
Chapter
Information
Sex Ratios
Concepts and Research Methods
, pp. 218 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, D V (1976) Observations on Litomastix aretas, an encyrtid parasite of the strawberry tortrix moth. Annals of Applied Biology, 84, 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antolin MF (1993) Genetics of biased sex ratios in subdivided populations: models, assumptions, and evidence. In: D Futuyma & J Antonovics (eds) Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, volume 9, pp 239–281. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Askew, R R & Ruse, J M (1974) Biology and taxonomy of species of the genus Enaysma Deluchhi (Hym., Eulophidae, Entedoninae) with special reference to the British fauna. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 125, 257–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avilla, J, Argtigues, M, Sarasúa, M J & Albajes, R (1990) A review of the biological characteristics of Encarsia tricolor and their implications for biological control. Bulletin O./I./L./B./S. R. O. P. (Organisation Internationale De Lutte Biologique/Section Regionale Ouest Palearctic), 13, 14–18Google Scholar
Avilla, J, Anadón, J, Sarasúa, M J & Albajes, R (1991) Egg allocation of the autoparasitoid Encarsia tricolor at different relative densities of the primary host (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) and two secondary hosts (Encarsia formosa and E. tricolor). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 59, 219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, G A (1982) Scientific innovation and creativity: a zoologist's point of view. American Zoologist, 22, 227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beingolea, O D (1959) Nota sobre Encarsia spp. (Hymenop.: Aphelinidae) parásito de los huevos de Anomis texana Riley (Lepidop.: Noctuidae). Revista Peruana de Entomologia Agraria, 2, 59–64Google Scholar
Bernal, J S, Luck, R F & Morse, J G (1998) Sex ratios in field populations of two parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Coccus hesperidum L. (Homoptera: Coccidae). Oecologia, 116, 510–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, D & Luck, R F (1990) Differences in the rates of superparasitism between two strains of Comperiella bifasciata (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) parasitizing California Red Scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae): an adaptation to circumvent encapsulation?Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 83, 591–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke A F G & N R Franks (1995) Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Bryan, G (1980) Courtship behaviour, size differences between the sexes and oviposition in some Achrysocharoides species (Hym., Eulophidae). Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 30, 611–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, G (1983) Seasonal biological variation in some leaf-miner parasites in the genus Achrysocharoides (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae). Ecological Entomology, 8, 259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J R, Yu, D S & Jones, J W (1993) Parasitism of the army cutworm, Euxoa auxillaris (Grt.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), by Copidosoma bakeri (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and effect on crop damage. Canadian Entomologist, 125, 329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov, E L (1979) The genetical evolution of patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness. American Naturalist, 113, 465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov E L (1982) The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Charnov, E L, los-den, Hartogh R L, Jones, W T & , Assem J (1981) Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment. Nature, 289, 27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C P (1939) The effect of host size upon the sex ratio of hymenopterous parasites and its relation to methods of rearing and colonization. Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 47, 1–9Google Scholar
Clausen C P (1940) Entomophagous Insects. New York: McGraw-Hill
Colgan, P & Taylor, P (1981) Sex-ratio in autoparasitic Hymenoptera. American Naturalist, 117, 564–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, S F, Slobodkin, L B, Wray, G A & Biermann, C H (1997) The ‘paradox’ of polyembryony: a review of the cases and a hypothesis for its evolution. Evolutionary Ecology, 11, 127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier R H & Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of Social Insect Colonies: Sex Allocation and Kin Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cruz, Y P (1981) A sterile defender morph in a polyembyronic hymenopterous parasite. Nature, 294, 446–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, J S & Walter, G H (1991a) Brood sex ratios of the solitary parasitoid wasp, Coccophagus atratus. Ecological Entomology, 16, 25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, J S & Walter, G H (1991b) Host population structure affects field sex ratios of the heteronomous hyperparasitoid, Coccophagus atratus. Ecological Entomology, 16, 35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doutt, R L (1947) Polyembryony in Copidosoma koehleri Blanchard. American Naturalist, 81, 435–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher R A (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Fisher, R C (1971) Aspects of the physiology of endoparasitic Hymenoptera. Biological Reviews, 46, 243–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S E (1942) The sex-ratio in the Hymenoptera: a function of the environment. Ecology, 23, 120–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, D (1966) Studies with whitefly parasites of Southern California. I. Encarsia pergandiella Howard (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Canadian Entomologist, 98, 707–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H C J (1987) The evolution of clutch size in parasitic wasps. American Naturalist, 129, 221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray H C J (1994) Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Godfray HCJ & JM Cook (1997) Mating systems of parasitoid wasps. In: J C Choe & B J Crespi (eds) The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, pp. 211–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Godfray, H C J & Hunter, M S (1992) Sex ratios of heteronomous hyperparasitoids: adaptive or nonadaptive?Ecological Entomology, 17, 89–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H C J & Parker, G A (1991) Clutch size, fecundity and parent-offspring conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B, 332, 67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H C J & Shaw, M R (1987) Seasonal variation in the reproductive strategy of the parasitic wasp Eulophus larvarum (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eulophidae). Ecological Entomology, 12, 251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H C J & Waage, J K (1990) The evolution of highly skewed sex ratios in aphelinid wasps. American Naturalist, 136, 715–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grbić, M, Ode, P J & Strand, M R (1992) Sibling rivalry and brood sex ratios in polyembryonic wasps. Nature, 360, 254–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R F, Gordh, G & Hawkins, B A (1982) Precise sex ratios in highly inbred parasitic wasps. American Naturalist, 120, 653–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W D (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156, 477–488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, I C W (1994) Sex ratio and mating structure in the parasitoid Hymenoptera. Oikos, 69, 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, I C W & Godfray, H C J (1990) Estimating the frequency of constrained sex allocation in field populations of Hymenoptera. Behaviour, 114, 137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, I C W, Ode, P J & Strand, M R (1993) Factors influencing brood sex ratios in polyembryonic Hymenoptera. Oecologia, 93, 343–348CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy ICW, Ode PJ & Siva-Jothy M (in press) Mating systems. In: M Jervis (ed) Insects as Natural Enemies. Practical Approaches to their Study and Evaluation, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Harvey, J A, Corley, L S & Strand, M R (2000) Competition induces adaptive shifts in caste ratios of a polyembryonic wasp. Nature, 406, 183–186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heimpel, G E (1994) Virginity and the cost of insurance in highly inbred Hymenoptera. Ecological Entomology, 19, 299–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M S (1993) Sex allocation in a field population of an autoparasitoid. Oecologia, 93, 421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M S (1999) The influence of parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia on the oviposition behavior and sex-specific developmental requirements of autoparasitoid wasps. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 735–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M S & Godfray, H C J (1995) Ecological determinants of sex ratio in an autoparasitoid wasp. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M S & Woolley, J B (2001) Evolution and behavioral ecology of heteronomous aphelinid parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology, 46, 251–290CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, M S, Nur, U & Werren, J H (1993) Origin of males by genome loss in an autoparasitoid wasp. Heredity, 70, 162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M S, Rose, M & Polaszek, A (1996) Divergent host relationships of males and females in the parasitoid Encarsia porteri (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 89, 667–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova-Kasas OM (1972) Polyembyrony in insects. In: S J Counce & C H Waddington (eds) Developmental Systems, volume 2, Insects, pp 243–271. New York: Academic Press
Kajita, H (1989) Mating activity of the aphelinid wasp, Encarsia spp. in the field (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology, 24, 313–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King BH (1993) Sex ratio manipulation by parasitoid wasps. In: D L Wrensch & M A Ebbert (eds) Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratio in Insects and Mites, pp 418–441. New York: Chapman & Hall
Kuenzel, N T (1975) Population dynamics of protelean parasites (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) attacking a natural population of Trialeurodes packardi (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and new host records for two species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 79, 400–404Google Scholar
Leiby, R W (1922) The polyembryonic development of Copidosoma gelechiae with notes on its biology. Journal of Morphology, 37, 195–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, P J (1998) The evolution of gregariousness in parasitoid wasps. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 265, 383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, P J & , Alphen J J M (1999) Gregarious development in alysiine parasitoids evolved through a reduction in larval aggression. Animal Behaviour, 58, 131–141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadel, H (1987) Male swarms discovered in Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae, Pteromalidae). Pan-pacific Entomologist, 63, 242–246Google Scholar
Nguyen, R & Sailer, R I (1987) Facultative hyperparasitism and sex determination of Encarsia smithi (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 80, 713–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noldus, L P J J, , Lenteren J C & Rumei, X (1987) Movement of adult greenhouse whiteflies, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, and its relevance for the development of spatial distribution patterns. Bulletin O. I. L. B./S. R. O. P, 10, 134–138Google Scholar
Ode, P J & Rosenheim, J A (1998) Sex allocation and the evolutionary transition between solitary and gregarious parasitoid development. American Naturalist, 152, 757–761CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ode, P J & Strand, M R (1995) Progeny and sex allocation decisions of the polyembryonic wasp Copidosoma floridanum. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, J T (1919) Polyembryony and sex. Journal of Heredity, 10, 344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenheim, J A (1993) Single-sex broods and the evolution of nonsiblicidal parasitoid wasps. American Naturalist, 141, 90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenheim, J A & Hongkham, D (1996) Clutch size in an obligately siblicidal parasitoid wasp. Animal Behaviour, 51, 841–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, G (1931) Parasites of the wheat-stem sawfly, Cephus pygmaeus, Linnaeus, in England. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 22, 479–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, G (1961) Competition among insect parasitoids. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 15, 96–119Google Scholar
Strand MR (1986) The physiological interactions of parasitoids with their hosts and their influence on reproductive strategies. In: J Waage & D Greathead (eds) Insect Parasitoids, pp 97–136. London: Academic Press
Strand, M R (1989a) Oviposition behavior and progeny allocation of the polyembryonic wasp Copidosoma floridanum (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 2, 355–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, M R (1989b) Clutch size, sex ratio and mating by the polyembryonic encyrtid Copidosoma floridanum (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Florida Entomologist, 72, 32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, M R & Grbić, M (1997a) The development and evolution of polyembryonic insects. Current Topics in Developmental Biology, 35, 121–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand MR & Grbić M (1997b) The life history and development of polyembryonic parasitoids. In: N E Beckage (ed) Parasites and Pathogens: Effects on Host Hormones and Behavior, pp 37–56. New York: Chapman & Hall
Strand, M R, Johnson, J A & Culin, J D (1990) Intrinsic interspecific competition between the polyembryonic parasitoid Copidosoma floridanum and solitary endoparasitoid Microplitis demolitor in Pseudoplusia includens. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 55, 275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P D & Sauer, A (1980) The selective advantage of sex-ratio homeostasis. American Naturalist, 116, 305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verner, J (1965) Selection for the sex ratio. American Naturalist, 99, 419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S B & Iwantsch, G F (1980) Host suitability for insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology, 25, 397–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, G H (1983) ‘Divergent male ontogenies’ in Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea): a simplified classification and a suggested evolutionary sequence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 19, 63–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, G H & Clarke, A R (1992) Unisexual broods and sex ratios in a polyembyronic encyrtid parasitoid (Copidosoma sp.: Hymenoptera). Oecologia, 89, 147–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, G H & Donaldson, J S (1994) Heteronomous hyperparasitoids, sex ratios and adaptations. Ecological Entomology, 19, 89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S A & Rivero, A (2000) Using sex ratios to estimate what limits reproduction in parasitoids. Ecology Letters, 3, 294–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S A, Flanagan, K E & Godfray, H C J (1999) Sex allocation and clutch size in parasitoid wasps that produce single-sex broods. Animal Behaviour, 57, 265–275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J R (1972) The biology of Physcus seminotus Silv. and P. subflavus Annecke & Insley (Aphelinidae), parasites of the sugar-cane scale insect Aulacaspis tegalensis (Zhnt.) (Diaspididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 61, 463–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J R (1977) Some features of sex-linked hyperparasitism in Aphelinidae [Hymenoptera]. Entomophaga, 22, 345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T (1991) Host selection and sex ratio in a heteronomous hyperparasitoid. Ecological Entomology, 16, 377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T (1996) A test of kin recognition in a heteronomous hyperparasitoid. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 81, 239–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T & Polaszek, A (1995) A re-examination of host relations in the Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 57, 35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zchori-Fein, E, Roush, R T & Hunter, M S (1992) Male production induced by antibiotic treatment in Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), an asexual species. Experientia, 48, 102–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×