Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: August 2014

2 - Imāmate (Legitimate Leadership)

Export citation
Summary

And (remember) when his Lord tried Ibrāhīm [Abraham] with [His] commands, and he fulfilled them, He said: “Lo! I have appointed you a leader (imām) for mankind.” [Ibrāhīm] said: “And of my offspring?” He said: “My covenant does not include wrongdoers.”

(Q2:124)

And We bestowed upon him Isḥāq (Isaac) and Ya‘qūb (Jacob) as a grandson. Each of them We made righteous. And We made them leaders (imāms) who guide by Our command, and We inspired in them the doing of good deeds and the right establishment of worship and the giving of alms, and they were worshippers of Us.

(Q21:72–73)

Every Shī‘ī group holds that ‘Alī was the legitimate successor to the Prophet based on either a formal or an informal designation. According to the Shī‘a, ‘Alī was not merely the rightful political head of the community but also wielded spiritual authority. He was an Imām as conceived of in the Qur’ānic verses that open this chapter, guaranteeing that the community would not be led astray and providing divinely inspired leadership. As mentioned in Chapter 1, rational divine justice supplies both a knowledge-centered and a politically centered justification for the necessity of the Imāmate. In the postprophetic era (Muḥammad being the last prophet), Imāms are designated by God to guide the Muslim community as both interpreters/preservers of revelation and political leaders. Although the Imām is the singular representative of legitimate authority, the nature of this authority (political versus religious) is contested among the different Shī‘ī communities.

This chapter focuses on various aspects of the institution of the Imāmate, arguably the most distinctive element of Shī‘ism. The organization of the chapter is thematic. The first section focuses on the spiritual dimensions of the Imāmate that are common to nearly every major Shī‘ī group. Specifically, it explores the concept of walāya, a notoriously difficult word to translate but one that broadly connotes the charismatic bond between the Shī‘a and the ahl al-bayt (lit. people of the house, but often simply referred to as the family of the Prophet). The second section examines the political dimensions of the Imāmate, such as the qualifications of an Imām and the scope of his authority. These issues are a primary means of differentiating between Shī‘ī groups.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Shi'i Islam
  • Online ISBN: 9781139381710
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381710
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×
Hinds, Martin, Studies in Early Islamic History, ed. Bacharach, Jere, Conrad, Lawrence, and Crone, Patricia (Princeton, NJ: Darwin, 1996).
Hodgson, Marshall, The Venture of Islam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974), vol. 1, particularly 187–230 (“The Early Muslim State”) and 241–79 (“The Islamic Opposition”).
Madelung, Wilferd, The Succession to Muhammad (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed., s.v. “Wilāya” (Dien and Walker).
Dakake, Maria, The Charismatic Community (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007).
Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali, The Divine Guide in Early Shi‘ism, translated by Streight, David (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009). (I)
Cooperson, Michael, Classical Arabic Biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), chapter 3. (T)
Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed., s.v. “Zaydiyya” (Madelung). (Z)
Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed., s.v. “Ismā‘īliyya” (Madelung). (I)
Daftary, Farhad, “The Earliest Ismā‘īlīs,” Arabica 38 (1991): 214–45. (I)
Daftary, Farhad, The Ismā‘īlīs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), chapter 3. (I)
Haider, Najam, “Zaydism: A Theological and Political Survey,” Religion Compass 4 (2010): 436–42. (Z)
Haykel, Bernard, Revival and Reform in Islam (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 1–24. (Z)
Haykel, Bernard and Zysow, Aron, “What Makes a Madhhab a Madhhab,” Arabica 59 (2013): 332–71. (Z)
Kohlberg, Etan, Belief and Law in Imāmī Shī‘ism (Brookfield, VT: Gower, 1991), particularly chapters 1, 3, and 13. (T)
Madelung, Wilferd, “Aspects of Ismā‘īlī Theology: The Prophetic Chain and the God beyond Being,” in Religious Schools and Sects in Medieval Islam (London: Variorum, 1985), chapter 17. (I)
Madelung, Wilferd, “Ismā‘īlism: The Old and the New Da‘wa,” in Religious Trends in Early Islamic Iran (Albany, NY: Persian Heritage Foundation, 1988), chapter 7. (I)
Modarressi, Hossein, Crisis and Consolidation in the Formative Period of Shi‘ite Islam (Princeton, NJ: Darwin, 1993), 3–18. (T)
Sobhani, Ja‘far, Doctrines of Shi‘i Islam, translated by Shah-Kazemi, Reza (New York: I. B. Tauris, 2001), 61–119. (T)
Tabataba‘i, Muhammad Husayn, Shi‘a, translated by Nasr, Sayyid Husayn (Qum: Ansariyan Publications, 1981), 173–90. (T)
Virani, Shafique, The Ismailis in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007). (I)
Cancel
Confirm
×