Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:01:06.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Support for market care: comparing child cash and tax benefits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Jérôme De Henau
Affiliation:
Researcher Department of Applied Economics Université Libre de Bruxelles
Danièle Meulders
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics University of Brussels
Síle O'Dorchai
Affiliation:
Researcher and Assistant Department of Applied Economics Université Libre de Bruxelles
Daniela del Boca
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
Cécile Wetzels
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Besides public childcare provision and maternity/paternity leave arrangements, a third way for the state to intervene in the childcare sphere is to grant benefits to families with young children. These could help them finance the cost of childcare purchased on the market or cover part of their child-related expenses. However, the problem with this support is the broad use that parents can make of it. On the one hand, financial support can help families buy care time on the market and thus allow both parents to work (e.g. Del Boca et al. 2003; Viitanen 2005). On the other hand, when benefits are not issued for the specific purpose of purchasing market care, they can and are used to pay for other needs (food, clothes, etc.). A possible effect, which is very important from the gender point of view, is that, if financial support is perceived as being too generous, it risks inducing mothers to quit the labour market (e.g. Lewis and Ostner 1994; Naz 2004). The effect of such support on the work/family balance is then less clear. In the following sections we will present indicators that measure purely financial generosity, knowing that it should be kept in mind that ‘general’ cash or tax benefits have an ambiguous effect.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Policies, Labour Markets and Motherhood
A Comparative Analysis of European Countries
, pp. 107 - 152
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Administration des contributions directes 2004. Mémento fiscal, Luxembourg. (www.impotsdirects.public.lu/legislation/memento/memento04.pdf)
Agencia Tributaria 2004. ‘Impuesto sobre la Renta de las Personas Fisicas’, Preguntas Frecuentes(www.aeat.es/).
Atkinson, T. 1999. ‘The distribution of income in the UK and OECD countries in the twentieth century’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 15: 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, B., S. P. Jenkins and J. Micklewright 2000. ‘Child poverty dynamics in seven nations’, mimeo, June, 40 pp.
Bradshaw, J. and N. Finch 2002. ‘A comparison of child benefit packages in 22 countries’, Research Report no. 174, University of York (www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rrep174.asp)
Del Boca, D., M. Locatelli and D. Vuri 2003. ‘Childcare choices by Italian households’, University of Turin and University of Florence, CHILD Working Paper.
Jepsen, M., D. Meulders, O. Plasman and P. Vanhuynegem 1997. Individualisation of the Social and Fiscal Rights and the Equal Opportunities Between Women and Men, Final report, DULBEA-ETE, Edition du DULBEA, January, LXXV, 322 pp.
Lehmann, P. and C. Wirtz 2004. ‘Household formation in the EU: lone parents’, Statistics in Focus, no. 5 /2004, Eurostat, European Communities.
LetablierBarbier, M.-T. J.-CL. 1998. ‘Etat et familles: Politiques publiques comparées en Europe’, in Collectif: L'Etat à l’épreuve du social, Paris: Editions Syllespse, pp. 139–51.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. and I. Ostner 1994. ‘Gender and the evolution of European social policies’, Universität Bremen, Zentrum für Sozialpolitik (Centre for Social Policy Research), ZeS-Arbeitspapier Nr. 4/94.
Lundberg, S. J. and Pollak, R. A. 1993. ‘Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market’, Journal of Political Economy 101, 988–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, S. J. and Pollak, R. A. 1996. ‘Bargaining and distribution in marriage’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, S. J., Pollak, R. A. and Wales, T. J. 1997. ‘Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from U.K. child benefit’, Journal of Human Resources 32, (3), 463–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micklewright, J. 2003. ‘Child poverty in English-speaking countries’, Innocenti Working Paper, no. 24, 40 pp.Google Scholar
Ministère des Finances 2004a. Mémento fiscal, Brussels.
Ministère des Finances 2004b. ‘Calcul de l'impôt’, Fiche descriptive no. 1084(www.fisc.gouv.fr/deploiement/p1/fichedescriptive_1084/fichedescriptive_1084.pdf)
MISSOC 2003. (http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/missoc2003/missoc_89_fr.htm)
Naz, G. 2004. ‘The impact of cash-benefit reform on parents’ labour force participation’, Journal of Population Economics 17, (2), 369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD 2004. Taxing Wages 2002–2003 2003 Edition, Source OECD Taxation, 2004, no. 1, i–446.
Olier, L. 1999. ‘Combien coûtent nos enfants ?’, Données sociales INSEE: 342–32.Google Scholar
Phipps, S. A. and Burton, P. S. 1998. ‘What's mine is yours? The influence of male and female incomes on patterns of household expenditure’, Economica, 65 (230), 599–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNICEF 2000. ‘A league table of child poverty in rich nations’, Innocenti Report Card, no. 1, June, Florence.
Viitanen, T. K. 2005. ‘Cost of childcare and female employment in the UK’, Labour 19, (S1), 149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×