Book contents
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Overview
- Part II Case Studies
- Part III Concluding Perspectives
- 14 Solving the Problem of (Non)compliance in Social and Economic Rights Litigation
- Case Index
- Thematic Index
- References
14 - Solving the Problem of (Non)compliance in Social and Economic Rights Litigation
from Part III - Concluding Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2017
Book contents
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Overview
- Part II Case Studies
- Part III Concluding Perspectives
- 14 Solving the Problem of (Non)compliance in Social and Economic Rights Litigation
- Case Index
- Thematic Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of ComplianceMaking it Stick, pp. 475 - 508Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bergman, Marcelo (2009), Tax Evasion and the Rule of Law in Latin America: The Political Culture of Cheating and Compliance in Argentina and Chile (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M. and Gauri, Varun (2008), ‘A New Policy Landscape: Legalizing Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World: Chapter 8’, in Gauri, Varun and Brinks, Daniel (eds.), Courting Social Justice (New York: Cambridge University Press), 303–352.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M. and Botero, Sandra (2014), ‘Inequality and the Rule of Law: Ineffective Rights in Latin America’, in Brinks, Daniel M., Mainwaring, Scott and Leiras, Marcelo (eds.), Reflections on Uneven Democracies: The Legacy of Guillermo O’Donnell (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), 214–239.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory (1986), ‘Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court’, American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1209–1226.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford (2009), ‘A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems’, Journal of Politics, 71(1), 55–69.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga (2001), ‘The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government’, Law & Society Review, 35(1), 117–164.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun and Brinks, Daniel M. (eds.) (2008), Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1995), ‘The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support, and the European Court of Justice’, American Journal of Political Science, 39, 459–489.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Baird, Vanessa A. (1998), ‘On the Legitimacy of National High Courts’, American Political Science Review, 92, 348–358.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana and Taylor, Matthew (2013), ‘Compliance: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Adherence to Judicial Rulings’, Law & Social Inquiry, 38(4), 803–835.Google Scholar
Peruzzotti, Enrique and Smulovitz, Catalina (eds.) (2006), Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in New Latin American Democracies (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press).Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles and Simon, William (2004), ‘Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds’, Harvard Law Review, 117(4), 1015–1101.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina (2003), ‘How Can the Rule of Law Rule? Cost Imposition through Decentralized Mechanisms’, in Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam (eds.), Democracy and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 168–187.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina and Peruzzotti, Enrique (2003), ‘Societal and Horizontal Controls: Two Cases of a Fruitful Relationship’, in Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher (eds.), Democratic Accountability in Latin America (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press), 309–332.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. (2004), ‘Judicial Policy Implementation in Mexico City and Mérida’, Comparative Politics, 37(1), 41–60.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. (2010), Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey and Vanberg, Georg (2008), ‘The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions’, American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 504–519.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. and Rasinski, Kenneth (1991), ‘Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular US Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson’, Law & Society Review, 25(3), 621–630.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg (2001), ‘Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review’, American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 346–361.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. (1997), ‘The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law’, American Political Science Review, 91(2), 245–263.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by