Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Get access
    Buy the print book
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian
  • Cited by 38
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Veronesi, Umberto Mauri, Maurizio Del Vecchio, Mario Armeni, Patrizio Esposito, Vincenza Iacono, Mario Pezzillo Mercurio, Lorenzo and Polimeni, Joseph 2018. The Myths of Health Care. p. 43.
    Schober, Madrean 2017. Strategic Planning for Advanced Nursing Practice. p. 65.
    Bridges, David 2017. Philosophy in Educational Research. p. 393.
    Noyes, Andrew and Adkins, Michael 2016. The Impact of Research on Policy: A Case of Qualifications Reform. British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 64, Issue. 4, p. 449.
    Hegger, Ingrid Kok, Maarten O. Janssen, Susan W.J. Schuit, Albertine J. and van Oers, Hans A.M. 2016. Contributions of knowledge products to health policy: a case study on the Public Health Status and Forecasts Report 2010. The European Journal of Public Health, Vol. 26, Issue. 6, p. 922.
    Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun and van Egmond, Stans 2015. Ineffable Cultures or Material Devices: What Valuation Studies can Learn from the Disappearance of Ensured Solidarity in a Health Care Market. Valuation Studies, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 45.
    Colebatch, H. K. 2015. Knowledge, Policy and the Work of Governing. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 209.
    ROMÁN, BEATRIZ SAN GAGGIOTTI, HUGO and MARRE, DIANA 2015. “You don't take anything for granted”: The role of anthropology in improving services, policies, and parenting practices for adoptive families. Annals of Anthropological Practice, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 205.
    Al Lily, Abdulrahman Essa and Foland, Jed Rivera 2015. Who Controls Whom? History and Educational Technologies. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 93.
    Phillips, Ruth and Goodwin, Susan 2014. Third Sector Social Policy Research in Australia: New Actors, New Politics. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 565.
    Wesselink, Anna and Gouldson, Andy 2014. Pathways to impact in local government: the mini-Stern review as evidence in policy making in the Leeds City Region. Policy Sciences, Vol. 47, Issue. 4, p. 403.
    Head, Brian Ferguson, Michele Cherney, Adrian and Boreham, Paul 2014. Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia. Policy and Society, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 89.
    Keune, Hans Springael, Johan and Keyser, Wim De 2013. Negotiated Complexity: Framing Multi-Criteria Decision Support in Environmental Health Practice. American Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 03, Issue. 01, p. 153.
    Fobé, Ellen Brans, Marleen Vancoppenolle, Diederik and Van Damme, Jan 2013. Institutionalized advisory systems: An analysis of member satisfaction of advice production and use across 9 strategic advisory councils in Flanders (Belgium). Policy and Society, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 225.
    James, Mary 2012. Growing confidence in educational research: threats and opportunities. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 181.
    Neuvel, Jeroen M. M. Scholten, Henk J. and van den Brink, Adri 2012. From Spatial Data to Synchronised Actions: The Network-centric Organisation of Spatial Decision Support for Risk and Emergency Management. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 51.
    Eynon, Rebecca 2012. The challenges and possibilities of the impact agenda. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 1.
    Pesch, Udo Huitema, Dave and Hisschemöller, Matthijs 2012. A Boundary Organization and its Changing Environment: The Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, the MNP. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 30, Issue. 3, p. 487.
    HAYNES, ABBY S. GILLESPIE, JAMES A. DERRICK, GEMMA E. HALL, WAYNE D. REDMAN, SALLY CHAPMAN, SIMON and STURK, HEIDI 2011. Galvanizers, Guides, Champions, and Shields: The Many Ways That Policymakers Use Public Health Researchers. Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 89, Issue. 4, p. 564.
    Wehrens, Rik Bekker, Marleen and Bal, Roland 2010. The construction of evidence-based local health policy through partnerships: Research infrastructure, process, and context in the Rotterdam ‘Healthy in the City’ programme. Journal of Public Health Policy, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 447.
    Download full list
    ×
  • Print publication year: 1991
  • Online publication date: February 2012

14 - Policy research: data, ideas, or arguments?

Export citation
Summary

We have delayed examination of the effects of social science on public policy long enough. This, and the succeeding chapter by Wittrock, now address ways in which the social sciences influence the development of policies in the modern state. Where Majone (chapter 13) drew ideas from the philosophy of science, I adopt an idea from the legal system, the idea of argumentation.

In the first half of the chapter, I examine the influence on policy of three types of research products: data and findings, ideas and criticism, and arguments or briefs for policy action. Whereas the traditional output of a policy study is a report of the first kind, heavy on data, conclusions, statistics, and findings, a review of the sketchy evidence available suggests that in some settings research has greater impact when it becomes part of advocacy for a preferred position.

The second part of the chapter then wrestles with the normative question: what stance should researchers adopt? It confronts the question of whether advocacy has a place in the policy researcher's kit. Policy research is a close relative of social science, and even though it has put on its working clothes and gone out to labour in the offices and chambers of government, it has not relinquished the ‘science’ label: thus, policy sciences. There is something uncomfortable in the thought of abandoning the norms of objectivity that characterize a science and embracing a notion of advocacy more suitable to an interest group or lobbyist.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Social Sciences and Modern States
  • Online ISBN: 9780511983993
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511983993
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×
Cancel
Confirm
×