Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

18 - The National Collegiate Athletic Association as a Collusive Monopsony

from V - Sports Labor Market
Summary

Introduction

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has been characterized as a cartel, that is, “a combination of independent commercial or industrial enterprises designed to limit competition.” As we will see, this is an accurate characterization, especially as it relates to the labor market for student-athletes and coaches. More precisely, the NCAA acts as a buyer cartel or collusive monopsony. Under the auspices of the NCAA, the member institutions collude to reduce competition among themselves in an effort to reduce costs and thereby generate more profit for their athletic programs. As we saw in the preceding chapter, monopsony is the awkward label attached to the market structure in which there is a single buyer of a good or service. In the United States, this market structure is rare indeed, but collusive monopsony is not so rare. Examples can be found throughout the economy, but the NCAA is a particularly good example.

The NCAA's members collude on two key inputs in the production of athletic competition: the student-athletes themselves and their coaches. With respect to athletes, the agreement restricts quantities by placing a ceiling on the number of scholarships that a school may award in each sport. In addition, in the name of amateurism, the compensation of these athletes is limited to room, board, tuition, books, and incidentals. Bonuses for winning conference championships are limited to relatively inexpensive rings or watches. There have been several legal challenges to the NCAA's monopolistic behavior by student-athletes, which we examine here. With respect to coaches, the number employed in each sport is limited by NCAA Bylaws. In this connection, we examine the Hennessey v. NCAA litigation. The compensation of coaches is typically unconstrained, although there have been attempts to restrict the earnings of some coaches. In this connection, we examine the Law v. NCAA litigation, which led the NCAA to rescind its rule restricting the earnings of some assistant coaches.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Sports Economics
  • Online ISBN: 9781139016957
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139016957
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References and Further Reading
Berri, David Schmidt, Martin Brook, Stacey 2007 The Wages of Wins Stanford, CA Stanford University Press
Blair, Roger D Harrison, Jeffrey L 2010 Monopsony in Antitrust Law and Economics New York Cambridge University Press 2010
Blair, Roger D Kaserman, David L 2009 Antitrust Economics New York Oxford University Press
Blair, R. D Romano, R. E 1997 Collusive Monopsony in Theory and Practice: The NCAA Antitrust Bulletin 42 681
Brown, R. W 1993 An Estimate of the Rent Generated by a Premium College Football Player Economic Inquiry 31 671
Brown, R. W 1994 Measuring Cartel Rents in the College Basketball Player Recruitment Market Applied Economics 26 27
Eckard, E. W 1998 The NCAA Cartel and Competitive Balance in College Football Review of Industrial Organization 13 347
Fleisher, Arthur A Goff, Brian Tollison, Robert D 1992 The National Collegiate Athletic Association: A Study in Cartel Behavior Chicago University of Chicago Press
Harrison, Jeffrey L Harrison, Casey C 2009 The Law and Economics of the N.C.A.A.'s Claim to Monopsony Rights Antitrust Bulletin 54 923
Kahn, L. M 2007 Cartel Behavior and Amateurism in College Sports Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 209
Lambrinos, James Ashman, Thomas D 2007 Salary Determination in the National Hockey League: Is Arbitration Efficient Journal of Sports Economics 8 192
Leonard, J Prinzinger, J. 1984 An Investigation into the Monopsonistic Market Structure of Division One NCAA Football and Its Effect on College Football Players Eastern Economic Journal 10 455
Zimbalist, Andrew 1999 Unpaid Professionals: Competition and Conflict in Big Time College Sports Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Fleisher, Arthur A. Goff, Brian L. Tollison, Robert D. The National Collegiate Athletic Association: A Study in Cartel Behavior Chicago University of Chicago Press 1992
1977
1995
Barro, Robert J. Wall Street Journal 1991
1940
1984