Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Røren, Pål and Beaumont, Paul 2018. Grading greatness: evaluating the status performance of the BRICS. Third World Quarterly, p. 1.

    Pedersen, Rasmus Brun 2018. Bandwagon for Status: Changing Patterns in the Nordic States Status-seeking Strategies?. International Peacekeeping, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 217.

    Krickovic, Andrej and Weber, Yuval 2018. What Can Russia Teach Us about Change? Status-Seeking as a Catalyst for Transformation in International Politics. International Studies Review, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 292.

    Duque, Marina G 2018. Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 62, Issue. 3, p. 577.

    Zala, Benjamin 2017. Polarity Analysis and Collective Perceptions of Power: The Need for a New Approach. Journal of Global Security Studies, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 2.

    Ward, Steven Michael 2017. Lost in Translation: Social Identity Theory and the Study of Status in World Politics. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 61, Issue. 4, p. 821.

    Kwan, Alan Shiu Cheung 2016. Hierarchy, status and international society: China and the steppe nomads. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 362.

    Petrova, Margarita H. 2016. Rhetorical Entrapment and Normative Enticement: How the United Kingdom Turned From Spoiler Into Champion of the Cluster Munition Ban. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, Issue. 3, p. 387.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: June 2014

4 - Status Is Cultural: Durkheimian Poles and Weberian Russians Seek Great-Power Status

Summary

Like its etymological twin − the state, status emerges within a specific cultural context or, to better capture the importance of relations between polities, a civilizational context. According to Durkheim and Mauss, “[a] civilization constitutes a kind of moral milieu encompassing a certain number of nations, each national culture being only a particular form of the whole.” Status-seeking between any groups of polities takes place in a specific social context. What Durkheim and Mauss had in mind was Christendom.

The historical fact that the state system grew out of Christendom and a Christian legal code (first ius gentium, then ius inter gentes) has repercussions not only for those left status-less, but also for how status was conferred within the system. Conflict over status played itself out as a discussion of which king was closest to God. Earthly powers were ordered in a hierarchy of descending closeness to God, with France on top, then other Christian rulers, then non-Christian rulers (and, we may add, people who were seen to be without rulers altogether). This hierarchical order carried over into early modernity and beyond, most recently as a “standard of civilization.”

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Status in World Politics
  • Online ISBN: 9781107444409
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107444409
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Durkheim, Émile, Mauss, Marcel, and Nelson, Benjamin, “Note on the Notion of Civilization,”Social Research 38, no. 4 (Winter 1971), 811
Reus-Smit, Christian, The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)
Buzan, Barry, “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School,”International Organization 47, no. 3 (Summer 1993), 327–352
Neumann, Iver B. and Sending, Ole Jacob, Governing the Global Polity: Practice, Rationality, Mentality (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010)
Neumann, Iver B. and Pouliot, Vincent, “Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian–Western Relations over the Past Millennium,”Security Studies 20, no. 1 (May 2011), 115–137
George, Alexander L. and Bennet, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004)
Jedlicki, Jerzi, A Suburb of Europe: Nineteenth-Century Polish Approaches to Western Civilization (Budapest: Central European Press, 1999)
Neumann, Iver B., Uses of the Other: The “East” in European Identity Formation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999)
Gerth, Hans H. and Wright Mills, C., Character and Social Structure: The Psychology of Social Institutions (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1964), 55
Oestreich, Gerhard, Neostoicism and the Early Modern State, ed. Koenigsberger, H. G. and Oestreich, Brigitta (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 252
Levy, Jack S., War in the Modern Great Power System, 1495–1975 (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1983)
Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (London: Hyman, 1987), 18–20
McKay, Derek and Scott, H. M., The Rise of the Great Powers, 1648–1815 (London: Longman, 1983), 92
Tjaden, Anja, “The Dutch in the Baltic, 1544–1721,” in In Quest of Trade and Security: The Baltic in Power Politics, 1500–1990, Vol I: 1500–1890, eds. Rystand, Göran, Böhme, Klaus-R, and Carlgren, Wilhelm M (Lund: Lund University Press, 1994), 61–136
Craig, Gordon A. and George, Alexander L., Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problem of Our Time (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 23
Roberts, Michael, Sweden as a Great Power 1611–1697: Government, Society, Foreign Policy (London: Edward Arnold, 1968)
Nayar, Baldev Raj and Paul, T. V., India in the World Order: Searching for Major-Power Status (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2003), 29–34
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Society (London: Macmillan, 1977)
Hurrell, Andrew, “Vattel: Pluralism and its Limits,” in Classical Theories of International Relations, eds. Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B. (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1994), 233–255
Ranke, Leopold von, “The Great Powers,” in The Theory and Practice of History, eds. Iggers, Georg G. and Moltke, Konrad von (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973), 65–101
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 83
Weber, Max, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, eds. Gerth, Hans H. and Wright Mills, C. (London: Routledge, 1991), 161
Weber, Max, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Studienausgabe, fifth ed. (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1976), 521
Durkheim, Emile, Lecons de Sociologie. Physique des moeurs et du droit, ed. Kubali, Huseyin Nail (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950)
Durkheim, Emile, Professional Ethics and Civic Morals (London: Routledge, 1992)
French, Mary Mel, United States Protocol: The Guide to Official Diplomatic Etiquette (Lanhan: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010), xvi
Goddard, Stacie E. and Nexon, Daniel H., “Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics,”European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 1 (March 2005), 9–61
Wohlforth, William C., “The Russian-Soviet Empire: A Test for Neorealism,”Review of International Studies 27, no. 5 (December 2001), 213–235
Waltz, Kenneth M., Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience (Boston: Little, Brown, 1967)
Rothschild, Joseph, East Central Europe between the Two World Wars (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1974)
Wandycz, Piotr S., “Poland’s Place in Europe in the Concepts of Piłsudski and Dmowski,”East European Politics and Societies 4, no. 3 (September 1990), 451–469
Wandycz, Piotr S., France and Her Eastern Allies 1919–1925: French Czechoslovak-Polish Relations from the Paris Peace Conference to Locarno (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962), 383
DePorte, Anton W., Europe between the Superpowers: The Enduring Balance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), 31
Jacobson, Jon, When the Soviet Union Entered World Politics (Berkeley: University of Califormia Press, 1994), 16
Davies, Norman, God’s Playground: A History of Poland, Vol. II (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981), 416
Senn, Albert Erich, The Great Powers, Lithuania, and the Vilna Question, 1920–1928 (Leiden: E.J. Brill, Studien zur Geschichte Osteuropas XI, 1966), 1–45, 118
Kimmich, Christoph M., The Free City: Danzig and German Foreign Policy 1919–1934 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968)
Terry, Sarah Meiklejohn, Poland’s Place in Europe: General Sikorski and the Origin of the Oder-Neisse Line, 1939–1943 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983), 26
Northedge, F. S., The League of Nations: Its Life and Times 1920–1946 (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1988), 102
DePorte, Anton W., Europe between the Superpowers: The Enduring Balance (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979), 393
Wandycz, Piotr S., The Twilight of French Eastern Alliances, 1926–1936: French-Czechoslovak-Polish Relations from Locarno to the Remilitarization of the Rhineland (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), 362
Roos, Hans, Polen und Europa: Studien zur Polnischen Aussenpolitik 1931–1939 (Leipzig: J. C. B. Mohr, 1957), 273–397
Cienciala, Anna M., Poland and the Western Powers 1938–1939: A Study in the Interdependence of Eastern and Western Europe (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968), 148, 256
Eden, Anthony, Facing the Dictators: The Memoirs of Anthony Eden, Earl of Avon (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962), 95
Lebow, Richard Ned, A Cultural Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 64
Zorin, V. A. et al., eds., Istoriya diplomatii, second ed. (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1959), 293
Anisimov, Evgeniy Viktorovich, “The Imperial Heritage of Peter the Great in the Foreign Policy of His Early Successors,” in Imperial Russian Foreign Policy, ed. Ragsdale, Hugh (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 23
Peterson, Claes, Peter the Great’s Administrative and Judicial Reforms: Swedish Antecedents and the Process of Reception (Stockholm: Nordiska Bokhandeln, 1979)
Dukes, Paul, The Making of Russian Absolutism 1613–1801, second ed. (London: Longman, 1990), 72, 112
Hartley, Janet, “Losing my Best Days: Charles Whitworth, First British Ambassador to Russia,”History Today 51, no. 6 (2000), 40–46
Bagger, Hans, “The Role of the Baltic in Russian Foreign Policy,” in Imperial Russian Foreign Policy, ed. Ragsdale, Hugh (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 36
Shafirov, Peter P., A Discourse Concerning the Just Causes of the War between Sweden and Russia: 1700–1721 (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana, 1973)
Watson, Adam, “Russia and the European States System,” in The Expansion of International Society, eds. Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984), 70
Hellmann, Manfred, “Die Friedensschlüsse von Nystad (1721) und Teschen (1779) als Etappen des Vordringen Russland nach Europa,” in Historisches Jahrbuch (Munich-Freiburg: Görres, 1978), 270–288
Horn, David Bayne, British Public Opinion and The First Partition of Poland (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1945), 18–19
Grimsted, Patricia Kennedy, The Foreign Ministers of Alexander I: Political Attitudes and the Conduct of Russian Diplomacy, 1801–1825 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969), 19
Neumann, Iver B., “Entry into International Society Reconceptualised: The Case of Russia,”Review of International Studies 37, no. 2 (April 2011), 463–484
Foucault, Michel, “Governmentality,” in Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 3, ed. Faubion, James D. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2000), 209–210
Malia, Martin, Russia Under Western Eyes: From the Bronze Horseman to the Lenin Mausoleum (Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1999)
Lincoln, Bruce W., In the Vanguard of Reform: Russia’s Enlightened Bureaucrats, 1825–1861 (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1982), 3, 175
Adenaure, Konrad, Briefe, 1945–1947 (Berlin: Siedler, 1983), 191
Wohlforth, William C., “The Perception of Power: Russia in the Pre-1914 Balance,”World Politics 39, no. 3 (April 1987), 353–381
Neumann, Iver B., “Russia as a Great Power,” in Russia as a Great Power: Dimensions of Security Under Putin, eds. Hedenskog, et al. (London: Routledge 2005), 13–28
Snyder, Jack, “Russia: Responses to Relative Decline,” in International Order and the Future of World Politics, eds. Paul, T. V. and Hall, John A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 146–154
Larson, Deborah Welch and Shevchenko, Alexei, “Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Response to U.S. Primacy,”International Security 34, no. 4 (Spring 2010), 63–95
Khazanov, Anatoly, “Russischer Nationalismus heute – zwischen Osten und Westen,”Transit 21, no. 2 (2001), 90–109
Prozorov, Sergei, Understanding Conflict Between Russia and the EU: The Limits of Integration (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), 42
Mahbubani, Kishore, The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East (New York: Public Affairs, 2008)
Deudney, Daniel and John Ikenberry, G.“The Myth of the Autocratic Revival: Why Liberal Democracy Will Prevail,”Foreign Affairs 88, no. 1 (January/February 2009), 77–93