Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kwan, Alan Shiu Cheung 2016. Hierarchy, status and international society: China and the steppe nomads. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 362.

    Petrova, Margarita H. 2016. Rhetorical Entrapment and Normative Enticement: How the United Kingdom Turned From Spoiler Into Champion of the Cluster Munition Ban. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, Issue. 3, p. 387.

    Zala, Benjamin 2017. Polarity Analysis and Collective Perceptions of Power: The Need for a New Approach. Journal of Global Security Studies, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 2.

    Ward, Steven Michael 2017. Lost in Translation: Social Identity Theory and the Study of Status in World Politics. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 61, Issue. 4, p. 821.

    Røren, Pål and Beaumont, Paul 2018. Grading greatness: evaluating the status performance of the BRICS. Third World Quarterly, p. 1.

    Pedersen, Rasmus Brun 2018. Bandwagon for Status: Changing Patterns in the Nordic States Status-seeking Strategies?. International Peacekeeping, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 217.

    Krickovic, Andrej and Weber, Yuval 2018. What Can Russia Teach Us about Change? Status-Seeking as a Catalyst for Transformation in International Politics. International Studies Review, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 292.

    Duque, Marina G 2018. Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 62, Issue. 3, p. 577.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: June 2014

4 - Status Is Cultural: Durkheimian Poles and Weberian Russians Seek Great-Power Status

Summary

Like its etymological twin − the state, status emerges within a specific cultural context or, to better capture the importance of relations between polities, a civilizational context. According to Durkheim and Mauss, “[a] civilization constitutes a kind of moral milieu encompassing a certain number of nations, each national culture being only a particular form of the whole.” Status-seeking between any groups of polities takes place in a specific social context. What Durkheim and Mauss had in mind was Christendom.

The historical fact that the state system grew out of Christendom and a Christian legal code (first ius gentium, then ius inter gentes) has repercussions not only for those left status-less, but also for how status was conferred within the system. Conflict over status played itself out as a discussion of which king was closest to God. Earthly powers were ordered in a hierarchy of descending closeness to God, with France on top, then other Christian rulers, then non-Christian rulers (and, we may add, people who were seen to be without rulers altogether). This hierarchical order carried over into early modernity and beyond, most recently as a “standard of civilization.”

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Status in World Politics
  • Online ISBN: 9781107444409
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107444409
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Durkheim, Émile, Mauss, Marcel, and Nelson, Benjamin, “Note on the Notion of Civilization,”Social Research 38, no. 4 (Winter 1971), 811
Reus-Smit, Christian, The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)
Buzan, Barry, “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School,”International Organization 47, no. 3 (Summer 1993), 327–352
Neumann, Iver B. and Sending, Ole Jacob, Governing the Global Polity: Practice, Rationality, Mentality (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010)
Neumann, Iver B. and Pouliot, Vincent, “Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian–Western Relations over the Past Millennium,”Security Studies 20, no. 1 (May 2011), 115–137
George, Alexander L. and Bennet, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004)
Jedlicki, Jerzi, A Suburb of Europe: Nineteenth-Century Polish Approaches to Western Civilization (Budapest: Central European Press, 1999)
Neumann, Iver B., Uses of the Other: The “East” in European Identity Formation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999)
Gerth, Hans H. and Wright Mills, C., Character and Social Structure: The Psychology of Social Institutions (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1964), 55
Oestreich, Gerhard, Neostoicism and the Early Modern State, ed. Koenigsberger, H. G. and Oestreich, Brigitta (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 252
Levy, Jack S., War in the Modern Great Power System, 1495–1975 (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1983)
Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (London: Hyman, 1987), 18–20
McKay, Derek and Scott, H. M., The Rise of the Great Powers, 1648–1815 (London: Longman, 1983), 92
Tjaden, Anja, “The Dutch in the Baltic, 1544–1721,” in In Quest of Trade and Security: The Baltic in Power Politics, 1500–1990, Vol I: 1500–1890, eds. Rystand, Göran, Böhme, Klaus-R, and Carlgren, Wilhelm M (Lund: Lund University Press, 1994), 61–136
Craig, Gordon A. and George, Alexander L., Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problem of Our Time (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 23
Roberts, Michael, Sweden as a Great Power 1611–1697: Government, Society, Foreign Policy (London: Edward Arnold, 1968)
Nayar, Baldev Raj and Paul, T. V., India in the World Order: Searching for Major-Power Status (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2003), 29–34
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Society (London: Macmillan, 1977)
Hurrell, Andrew, “Vattel: Pluralism and its Limits,” in Classical Theories of International Relations, eds. Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B. (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1994), 233–255
Ranke, Leopold von, “The Great Powers,” in The Theory and Practice of History, eds. Iggers, Georg G. and Moltke, Konrad von (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973), 65–101
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 83
Weber, Max, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, eds. Gerth, Hans H. and Wright Mills, C. (London: Routledge, 1991), 161
Weber, Max, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Studienausgabe, fifth ed. (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1976), 521
Durkheim, Emile, Lecons de Sociologie. Physique des moeurs et du droit, ed. Kubali, Huseyin Nail (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950)
Durkheim, Emile, Professional Ethics and Civic Morals (London: Routledge, 1992)
French, Mary Mel, United States Protocol: The Guide to Official Diplomatic Etiquette (Lanhan: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010), xvi
Goddard, Stacie E. and Nexon, Daniel H., “Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics,”European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 1 (March 2005), 9–61
Wohlforth, William C., “The Russian-Soviet Empire: A Test for Neorealism,”Review of International Studies 27, no. 5 (December 2001), 213–235
Waltz, Kenneth M., Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience (Boston: Little, Brown, 1967)
Rothschild, Joseph, East Central Europe between the Two World Wars (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1974)
Wandycz, Piotr S., “Poland’s Place in Europe in the Concepts of Piłsudski and Dmowski,”East European Politics and Societies 4, no. 3 (September 1990), 451–469
Wandycz, Piotr S., France and Her Eastern Allies 1919–1925: French Czechoslovak-Polish Relations from the Paris Peace Conference to Locarno (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962), 383
DePorte, Anton W., Europe between the Superpowers: The Enduring Balance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), 31
Jacobson, Jon, When the Soviet Union Entered World Politics (Berkeley: University of Califormia Press, 1994), 16
Davies, Norman, God’s Playground: A History of Poland, Vol. II (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981), 416
Senn, Albert Erich, The Great Powers, Lithuania, and the Vilna Question, 1920–1928 (Leiden: E.J. Brill, Studien zur Geschichte Osteuropas XI, 1966), 1–45, 118
Kimmich, Christoph M., The Free City: Danzig and German Foreign Policy 1919–1934 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968)
Terry, Sarah Meiklejohn, Poland’s Place in Europe: General Sikorski and the Origin of the Oder-Neisse Line, 1939–1943 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983), 26
Northedge, F. S., The League of Nations: Its Life and Times 1920–1946 (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1988), 102
DePorte, Anton W., Europe between the Superpowers: The Enduring Balance (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979), 393
Wandycz, Piotr S., The Twilight of French Eastern Alliances, 1926–1936: French-Czechoslovak-Polish Relations from Locarno to the Remilitarization of the Rhineland (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), 362
Roos, Hans, Polen und Europa: Studien zur Polnischen Aussenpolitik 1931–1939 (Leipzig: J. C. B. Mohr, 1957), 273–397
Cienciala, Anna M., Poland and the Western Powers 1938–1939: A Study in the Interdependence of Eastern and Western Europe (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968), 148, 256
Eden, Anthony, Facing the Dictators: The Memoirs of Anthony Eden, Earl of Avon (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962), 95
Lebow, Richard Ned, A Cultural Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 64
Zorin, V. A. et al., eds., Istoriya diplomatii, second ed. (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1959), 293
Anisimov, Evgeniy Viktorovich, “The Imperial Heritage of Peter the Great in the Foreign Policy of His Early Successors,” in Imperial Russian Foreign Policy, ed. Ragsdale, Hugh (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 23
Peterson, Claes, Peter the Great’s Administrative and Judicial Reforms: Swedish Antecedents and the Process of Reception (Stockholm: Nordiska Bokhandeln, 1979)
Dukes, Paul, The Making of Russian Absolutism 1613–1801, second ed. (London: Longman, 1990), 72, 112
Hartley, Janet, “Losing my Best Days: Charles Whitworth, First British Ambassador to Russia,”History Today 51, no. 6 (2000), 40–46
Bagger, Hans, “The Role of the Baltic in Russian Foreign Policy,” in Imperial Russian Foreign Policy, ed. Ragsdale, Hugh (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 36
Shafirov, Peter P., A Discourse Concerning the Just Causes of the War between Sweden and Russia: 1700–1721 (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana, 1973)
Watson, Adam, “Russia and the European States System,” in The Expansion of International Society, eds. Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984), 70
Hellmann, Manfred, “Die Friedensschlüsse von Nystad (1721) und Teschen (1779) als Etappen des Vordringen Russland nach Europa,” in Historisches Jahrbuch (Munich-Freiburg: Görres, 1978), 270–288
Horn, David Bayne, British Public Opinion and The First Partition of Poland (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1945), 18–19
Grimsted, Patricia Kennedy, The Foreign Ministers of Alexander I: Political Attitudes and the Conduct of Russian Diplomacy, 1801–1825 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969), 19
Neumann, Iver B., “Entry into International Society Reconceptualised: The Case of Russia,”Review of International Studies 37, no. 2 (April 2011), 463–484
Foucault, Michel, “Governmentality,” in Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 3, ed. Faubion, James D. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2000), 209–210
Malia, Martin, Russia Under Western Eyes: From the Bronze Horseman to the Lenin Mausoleum (Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1999)
Lincoln, Bruce W., In the Vanguard of Reform: Russia’s Enlightened Bureaucrats, 1825–1861 (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1982), 3, 175
Adenaure, Konrad, Briefe, 1945–1947 (Berlin: Siedler, 1983), 191
Wohlforth, William C., “The Perception of Power: Russia in the Pre-1914 Balance,”World Politics 39, no. 3 (April 1987), 353–381
Neumann, Iver B., “Russia as a Great Power,” in Russia as a Great Power: Dimensions of Security Under Putin, eds. Hedenskog, et al. (London: Routledge 2005), 13–28
Snyder, Jack, “Russia: Responses to Relative Decline,” in International Order and the Future of World Politics, eds. Paul, T. V. and Hall, John A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 146–154
Larson, Deborah Welch and Shevchenko, Alexei, “Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Response to U.S. Primacy,”International Security 34, no. 4 (Spring 2010), 63–95
Khazanov, Anatoly, “Russischer Nationalismus heute – zwischen Osten und Westen,”Transit 21, no. 2 (2001), 90–109
Prozorov, Sergei, Understanding Conflict Between Russia and the EU: The Limits of Integration (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), 42
Mahbubani, Kishore, The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East (New York: Public Affairs, 2008)
Deudney, Daniel and John Ikenberry, G.“The Myth of the Autocratic Revival: Why Liberal Democracy Will Prevail,”Foreign Affairs 88, no. 1 (January/February 2009), 77–93