Book contents
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning Gains
- Reviews
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning Gains
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Program Dosage and Quality
- Part II Continuity from Preschool to Third Grade
- Part III School and Family Processes of Impacts over Time
- Part IV Synthesis and Guiding Principles
- 14 Enhancing Children’s Outcomes since “Eager to Learn”
- 15 Reframing Policy and Practice Deliberations
- Subject Index
- Name Index
- References
15 - Reframing Policy and Practice Deliberations
Twelve Hallmarks of Strategies to Attain and Sustain Early Childhood Gains
from Part IV - Synthesis and Guiding Principles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2018
Book contents
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning Gains
- Reviews
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning Gains
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Program Dosage and Quality
- Part II Continuity from Preschool to Third Grade
- Part III School and Family Processes of Impacts over Time
- Part IV Synthesis and Guiding Principles
- 14 Enhancing Children’s Outcomes since “Eager to Learn”
- 15 Reframing Policy and Practice Deliberations
- Subject Index
- Name Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sustaining Early Childhood Learning GainsProgram, School, and Family Influences, pp. 314 - 349Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Barnett, W. S. (2004). Does Head Start have lasting cognitive effects? The myth of fade out, in Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), Head Start Debates (pp. 221–249). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. S. & Carolan, M. E. (2014). Facts about Fadeout: The Research Base on Long-Term Impacts of High Quality Pre-K (CEELO FastFact). New Brunswick, NJ: Center on Enhancing Early Learning Outcomes.Google Scholar
Bickel, W. K., Moody, L., Quisenberry, A. J., Ramey, C. T. & Sheffer, C. E. (2014). A competing neurobehavioral decision systems model of SES-related health and behavioral disparities. Preventive Medicine, 68, 37–43. PMID: 25008219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camilli, G., Vargas, S., Ryan, S. & Barnett, W. S. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 579–620. Available at: http://rci.rutgers.edu/~camilli/Papers/38_15440.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F. A., Conti, G., Heckman, J. J. et al. (2014). Early childhood investments substantially boost adult health. Science, 343, 1478–1485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J. & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). Early childhood education: young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian Project. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 42–57.Google Scholar
Currie, J. & Thomas, D. (1995). Does Head Start make a difference?, American Economic Review, 83, 241–364.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A. (Ed.) (2017). The Current State of Scientific Knowledge on Pre-Kindergarten Effects. Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J., Moon, S. H., Pinto, R., Savelyev, P. A. & Yavitz, A. (2010). The rate of return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program. Journal of Public Health, 94, 114–128.Google Scholar
Kay, N. & Pennucci, A. (2014). Early Childhood Education for Low-Income Students: A Review of the Evidence and Benefit–Cost Analysis (Doc. No. 14–01-2201). Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from: www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/1547/Wsipp_Early-Childhood-Education-for-Low-Income-Students-A-Review-of-the-Evidence-and-Benefit-Cost-Analysis_Full-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Lazar, I. & Darlington, R. (Eds.). (1982). Lasting effects of early education: A report from the consortium for longitudinal studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.Google Scholar
Lewin, K., (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. Oxford: Harpers.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. A., Lipsey, M. W., Dodge, K. A. et al. (2017). Puzzling it out: the current state of scientific knowledge on pre-kindergarten effects: a consensus statement, in Dodge, K. A. (Ed.), The Current State of Scientific Knowledge on Pre-Kindergarten Effects (pp. 19–30). Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
Ramey, C. T. (1982). Commentary, in Lazar, I. & Darlington, R. (Eds.), Lasting Effects of Early Education: A Report from the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 195, 142–151.Google Scholar
Ramey, C. T. (2018). The Abecedarian approach to social, educational, and health disparities. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. PMID:29637322Google ScholarPubMed
Ramey, C. T., Campbell, F. A., Burchinal, M. et al. (2000). Persistent effects of early childhood education on high-risk children and their mothers. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 2–14.Google Scholar
Ramey, C. T. & Ramey, S. L. (1998). Early intervention and early experience. American Psychologist, 53, 109–120.Google Scholar
Ramey, C.T., Sparling, J. J. & Ramey, S. L. (2012). Abecedarian: The Ideas, The Approach, and The Findings. Los Altos, CA: Sociometrics Corporation.Google Scholar
Ramey, S. L., Crowell, N. A., Ramey, C. T., Grace, C., Timraz, N. & Davis, L. E. (2011). The dosage of professional development for early childhood professionals: how the amount and density of professional development may influence its effectiveness. Advances in Early Education and Day Care, 15, 11–32.Google Scholar
Ramey, S. L. & Ramey, C. T. (2005). How to create and sustain a high quality workforce in child care, early intervention, and school readiness programs, in Zaslow, M. & Martinez-Beck, I. (Eds.), Critical Issues in Early Childhood Professional Development (pp. 355–368). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Ramey, S. L. & Ramey, C. T. (2007). Establishing a science of professional development for early education programs: the Knowledge Application Information Systems (KAIS) theory of professional development, in Justice, L. M. & Vukelich, C. (Eds.), Achieving Excellence in Preschool Language and Literacy Instruction. (pp. 41–63) New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ramey, S. L., Ramey, C. T., Phillips, M. M. et al. (2001). Head Start Children’s Entry into Public Schools: A Report on the National Head Start/Public School Early Childhood Transition Demonstration Study (Contract No. 105–95-1935). Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (2000). Success in Early Intervention: The Chicago Child–Parent Centers. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A. & Ou, S. (2010). Impacts and implications of the child–parent center preschool program, in Reynolds, A. J., Rolnick, A. J., Englund, M. M. & Temple, J. (Eds.), Childhood Programs and Practices in the First Decade of Life: A Human Capital Integration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schweinhart, L. J. & Weikart, D. P. (1983). The effects of the Perry Preschool Program on youths through age 15, in Consortium for Longitudinal Studies (Ed.), As the Twig Is Bent: Lasting Effects of Preschool Programs (pp. 71–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z. et al. (2005). Lifetime Effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through Age 40. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.Google Scholar
Shonkoff, J. P. & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar