Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    STADDON, SAM C. NIGHTINGALE, ANDREA and SHRESTHA, SHYAM K. 2015. Exploring participation in ecological monitoring in Nepal's community forests. Environmental Conservation, Vol. 42, Issue. 03, p. 268.

    Durant, Sarah M. 2013. Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation. p. 311.

    Danielsen, Finn Burgess, Neil D. Jensen, Per M. and Pirhofer-Walzl, Karin 2010. Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of peoples involvement. Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 47, Issue. 6, p. 1166.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: December 2010

1 - Introduction: learning from experiences of participatory biodiversity assessment

Summary

Introduction

A few years ago, curious to find out how individuals can bring about change in environmental policy, I arranged to meet volunteers who collect data about species distributions. My first interview was with a lively, successful group of volunteers in the south of England, who had developed a new approach for monitoring hedgerows. Ancient hedgerows are important for conservation in Britain, helping to maintain diversity of habitat, and connect up patches of otherwise isolated woodland. As a result of systematic surveys, some of them by volunteers, the British Government had changed the law and introduced incentives for farmers to replant them (in 1992), and regulations to protect them (in 1994).

Certainly the volunteers were enthusiastic about their successes and policy impact. But what they mostly wanted to talk about was the beauty of hedgerows, the pleasure they found in observing the variety in a line of trees, and the feeling that without the excuse of collecting data, they were being a little self-indulgent by spending time in nature. As one said, ‘It's nice, but as long as you do it with a purpose in mind and at the end of it you feel you've done something really quite good’.

Thousands of miles away, other people were collecting data about species, but these data had a more immediate effect on their lives. They were villagers in Karnataka, in southern India, who shared management of their forests with the state Forest Department.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Taking Stock of Nature
  • Online ISBN: 9780511676482
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676482
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Agarwal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26, 413–439.
Badola, R. and Hussain, S. A. (2005). Valuing ecosystem functions: An empirical study on the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India. Environmental Conservation 32, 85–92.
Baker, K. S. and Bowker, G. C. (2007). Information ecology: Open system environment for data, memories, and knowing. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 29, 127–144.
Balmford, A., Crane, P., Dobson, A., Green, R. E. and Mace, G. M. (2005). The 2010 challenge: Data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 360, 221–228.
Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10, 1251–1262.
Bliss, J., Aplet, G., Hartzell, C.et al. (2001). Community-based ecosystem monitoring. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 12, 143–167.
Bollig, M. and Schulte, A. (1999). Environmental change and pastoral perceptions: degradation and indigenous knowledge in two African pastoral communities. Human Ecology 27, 493–514.
Boudreau, S. A. and Yan, N. D. (2004). Auditing the accuracy of a volunteer-based surveillance program for an aquatic invader bythotrephes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 91, 17–26.
Boylen, C.-W., Howe, E.-A., Bartkowski, J.-S. and Eichler, L.-W. (2004). Augmentation of a long-term monitoring program for Lake George, NY by citizen volunteers. Lake and Reservoir Management 20, 121–129.
Brandon, A., Spyreas, G., Flores, B. Molano, Carroll, C. and Ellis, J. (2003). Can volunteers provide reliable data for forest vegetation surveys?Natural Areas Journal 23, 254–262.
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B. and Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education 27, 1099–1121.
Brown, K. (1998). The political ecology of biodiversity, conservation and development in Nepal's Terai: confused meanings, means and ends. Ecological Economics 24, 73–87.
Buckland, S. T., Magurran, A. E., Green, R. E. and Fewster, R. M. (2005). Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 360, 243–254.
Burgess, J., Clark, J. and Harrison, C. M. (2000). Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics 35, 119–132.
,CBD (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at http://www.biodiv.org/convention/.
Conrad, C. (2006). Towards meaningful community-based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: where are we versus where we would like to be. Environments 34, 25–36.
Conrad, C. T. and Daoust, T. (2008). Community-based monitoring frameworks: increasing the effectiveness of environmental stewardship. Environmental Management 41, 358–366.
Contandriopoulos, D. (2004). A sociological perspective on public participation in health care. Social Science and Medicine 58, 321–330.
,Convention on Biological Diversity (2005). Guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive Environmental 1 Impact Assessment (EIA) available at http://www.cbd.int/doc/reviews/impact/EIA-guidelines.pdf.
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D. and Balmford, A. (2005). Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2507–2542.
Danielsen, F., Jensen, A. E., Alviola, P. A.et al. (2005). Does monitoring matter? A quantitative assessment of management decisions from locally-based monitoring of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2633–2652.
Danielsen, F., Mendoza, M. M., Tagtag, A.et al. (2007). Increasing conservation management action by involving local poeple in natural resource monitoring. Ambio 36.
Davies, A. R. (2001). Hidden or hiding? Public perceptions of participation in the planning system. Town Planning Review 72, 193–216.
,DETR (2000). Public Participation in Making Local Environmental Decisions: The Aarhus Convention Newcastle Workshop. Good Practice Handbook. London, UK: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
Escobar, A. (1998). Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology 5, 53–82.
Estrella, M., Blauert, J., Campilan, D.et al. (editors) (2000). Learning from Change: Issues and Experiences in Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation. Participation in Development. Intermediate Technology.
Failing, L. and Gregory, R. (2003). Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. Journal of Environmental Management 68, 121–132.
Faith, D. P. (2005). Global biodiversity assessment: integrating global and local values and human dimensions. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 15, 5–8.
Fischer, A. and Young, J. C. (2007). Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biological Conservation 136, 271–282.
Fischer, F. (2006). Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment. The cultural politics of discursive space. American Review of Public Administration 36, 19–40.
Garcia, C. A. and Lescuyer, G. (2008). Monitoring, indicators and community based forest management in the tropics: pretexts or red herrings?Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 1303–1317.
Gaston, K. J. (1996). Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Goodwin, P. (1998). ‘Hired hands’ or ‘local voice’: understandings and experience of local participation in conservation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23, 481–491.
Hein, L., Koppen, K., Groot, R. S. and Ierland, E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 57, 209–228.
Hopkin, M. (2007). Mark of respect. Nature 448, 402–403.
Humphries, C. J., Williams, P. H. and Vane-Wright, R. I. (1995). Measuring biodiversity value for conservation. Annual Review Ecology and Systematics 26, 93–111.
Kapoor, I. (2001). Toward participatory environmental management?Journal of Environmental Management 63, 269–279.
Karney, R. C. (2000). Poor water quality? Not in my backyard! The effectiveness of neighborhood pond associations in the protection and improvement of shellfish growing waters on Martha's Vineyard. Journal of Shellfish Research 19, 465–466.
Lawrence, A. (2006). “No Personal Motive?” Volunteers, Biodiversity and the False Dichotomies of Participation. Ethics, Place and Environment 9, 279–298.
Lawrence, A. (2009). The first cuckoo in winter: phenology, recording, credibility and meaning in Britain. Global Environmental Change 19, 173–179.
Lawrence, A., Ambrose-Oji, B., Lysinge, R. and Tako, C. (2000). Exploring local values for forest biodiversity on Mount Cameroon. Mountain Research & Development 20, 112–115.
Lawrence, A. and Hawthorne, W. (2006). Plant Identification: User-friendly Field Guides for Biodiversity Management. London: Earthscan.
Lawrence, A., Paudel, K., Barnes, R. and Malla, Y. (2006). Adaptive value of participatory biodiversity monitoring in community forestry. Environmental Conservation 33, 325–334.
Lazdinis, M., Angelstam, P. and Lazdinis, I. (2007). Maintenance of forest biodiversity in a post-soviet governance model: Perceptions by local actors in Lithuania. Environmental Management 40, 20–33.
Leach, M. and Mearns, R. (editors) (1996). The Lie of the Land: Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment. Oxford: James Currey.
Maass, J. M., Balvanera, P., Castillo, A.et al. (2005). Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: Insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecology and Society 10.
Mace, G. M. and Baillie, J. E. M. (2007). The 2010 biodiversity indicators: Challenges for science and policy. Conservation Biology 21, 1406–1413.
Mayer, P. (2006). Biodiversity – the appreciation of different thought styles and values helps to clarify the term. Restoration Ecology 14, 105–111.
McCaffrey, R. E. (2005). Using citizen science in urban bird studies. Urban Habitats 3, 70–86 [online].
,Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2008). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: guide to the Millennium Assessment reports, accessed 2008 available at http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx.
Moffat, A. J.Davies, S. and Finer, L. (2008). Reporting the results of forest monitoring – an evaluation of the European forest monitoring programme. Forestry 81, 75–90.
Morris, C. (2006). Negotiating the boundary between state-led and farmer approaches to knowing nature: an analysis of UK agri-environment schemes. Geoforum 37, 113–127.
,Natural History Museum (2001). Biodiversity and worldmap: measuring biodiversity value. Accessed 2001: Natural History Museum available at http://www.nhm.ac.uk/science/projects/worldmap/diversity/index.html.
Newman, C., Buesching, C. D. and Macdonald, D. W. (2003). Validating mammal monitoring methods and assessing the performance of volunteers in wildlife conservation – “Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodies?”Biological Conservation 113, 189–197.
Noss, A., Cuellar, E. and Cuellar, R. (2003). Hunter self-monitoring as a basis for biological research: data from the Bolivian Chaco. Mastozoologia Neotropical/Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy 10, 49–67.
Parkins, J. R. (2006). De-centering environmental governance: a short history and analysis of democratic processes in the forest sector of Alberta, Canada. Policy Sciences 39, 183–203.
Perlman, D. L. and Adelson, G. (1997). Biodiversity: Exploring Values and Priorities in Conservation. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
Pilz, D., Ballard, H. L. and Jones, E. T. (2006). Broadening Participation in Biological Monitoring: Handbook for Scientists and Managers available at http://www.ifcae.org/projects/ncssf3/IFCAE-ParticipatoryMonitoringGuidelines-2005.pdf.
Plummer, R. and Fitzgibbon, J. (2004). Co-management of natural resources: A proposed framework. Environmental Management 33, 876–885.
Pollock, R. M. and Whitelaw, G. S. (2005). Community-based monitoring in support of local sustainability. Local Environment 10, 211–228.
Pond, K. and Rees, G. (2000). Coastwatch UK: a public participation survey. Journal of Coastal Conservation 6(1), 61–66.
Rappaport, R. (1979). Ecology, Meaning & Religion. North Atlantic Books.
Reitbergen-McCracken, J. and Narayan, D. (1997). A Resource Kit for Participation and Social Assessment. Washington DC:The World Bank.
Robertson, D. P. and Hull, R. B. (2003). Public ecology: an environmental science and policy for global society. Environmental Science & Policy 6, 399–410.
,Royal Society (2003). Measuring biodiversity for conservation available at http://www.royalsociety.org/displaypagedoc.asp?id=6712.
Saris, F., Groot, H., Hagemeijer, W. and Van, D. A. (1996). Monitoring the Dutch agricultural bird community (a choice between a data-death because of the fear of inadequate data and a practical monitoring programme). Ekologia Bratislava 15, 87–96.
Scoones, I. (1999). New ecology and the social sciences: what prospects for a fruitful engagement?Annual Review of Anthropology 28, 479–507.
Sharpe, A. and Conrad, C. (2006). Community based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: challenges and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 113, 395–409.
Sheil, D. and Lawrence, A. (2004). Tropical biologists, local people and conservation: new opportunities for collaboration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 634–638.
Slootwega, R. and Kolhoff, A. (2003). A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23, 657–681.
Takacs, D. (1996). The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tangwa, G. B. (1999). Globalisation or westernisation? Ethical concerns in the whole big-business. Bioethics 13, 218–226.
Thibault, M. and Blaney, S. (2001). Sustainable human resources in a protected area in southwestern Gabon. Conservation Biology 15, 591–595.
Tsouvalis, J., Seymour, S. and Watkins, C. (2000). Exploring knowledge-cultures: precision farming, yield mapping, and the expert-farmer interface. Environment and Planning A 32, 909–924.
Usher, P. J. (2000). Traditional ecological knoweldge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic 53, 183–193.
Jaarsveld, A. S., Biggs, R., Scholes, R. J.et al. (2005). Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 360, 425–441.
Vermeulen, S. and Koziell, I. (2002). Integrating Global and Local Values: a Review of Biodiversity Assessment. London: IIED.
Wagner, G. A. (2005). Participatory monitoring of changes in coastal and marine biodiversity. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences 34, 136–146.
Wollenberg, E., Anderson, J. and Edmunds, D. (2001). Pluralism and the less powerful: accommodating multiple interests in local forest management. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 1, 199–222.
Yoccoz, N. G., Nichols, J. D. and Boutlinier, T. (2001). Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 446–453.