Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Pagès, Marie Fischer, Anke and van der Wal, René 2018. The dynamics of volunteer motivations for engaging in the management of invasive plants: insights from a mixed-methods study on Scottish seabird islands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 61, Issue. 5-6, p. 904.

    Durant, Sarah M. 2013. Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation. p. 311.

  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: December 2010

12 - The personal and political of volunteers' data: towards a national biodiversity database for the UK


Britain has an exceptional tradition of natural history societies and amateur naturalists who collect data about species distributions, frequency and behaviour (Bell et al., this volume). This chapter examines an attempt to harness the data for a wider range of purposes, and the ways in which different actors have perceived and responded to this. Many of the volunteers have a strong personal attachment to their data, and to the ways in which they hope that it will be used. When powerful organizations become involved in managing the data, the volunteers can perceive threats and opportunities for the value of their data. The chapter considers the need to balance these emotional and political aspects in developing an effective national data management system. It is based on a cross-cutting analysis of research into the processes behind biodiversity action plans and biological recording, conducted over several years in the UK (Gillett and Lawrence, 2003; Lawrence, 2005; Lawrence, 2006; Lawrence and Molteno in press; Lawrence and Turnhout, 2005). The chapter draws on interviews with volunteers and professionals involved in the complex organizational landscape that has evolved around biological data collection and sharing, descriptions of the process on websites and in reports, and on presentations made at the annual National Biodiversity Network conferences.

The supply side: growth of biological recording

Biological recording, or the collection of data about the distribution and abundance of species, has a long history in Britain, going back to the leisure time of country vicars in the eighteenth century (Moss, 2004).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Taking Stock of Nature
  • Online ISBN: 9780511676482
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
Battersby, J. E. and Greenwood, J. J. D.. (2004). Monitoring terrestrial mammals in the UK: past, present and future, using lessons from the bird world. Mammal Review 34, 3–29.
Scotland, Biodiversity (2008). Biodiversity Duty for Public Bodies. Scottish Government. Available at
Bowler, P. (2003). Identity crisis. In The Guardian, pp. 8–9. London.
,BRISC (2006). Biological Recording in Scotland: Strategic Business Plan 2006 – 2016. Available at:–16.pdf.
Burnett, J., Copp, C., and Harding, P. (1995). Biological Recording in the UK: Present Practice and Future Development. Coordinating Commission for Biological Recording. Ruislip, England.
,DEFRA (2006a). Biodiversity Indicators – Working with the Grain of Nature – Taking it Forward: Volume II. Measuring Progress on the England Biodiversity Strategy: 2006 Assessment. London: DEFRA. Available at:
,DEFRA (2006b). The UK Biodiversity Action Plan: Highlights of the 2005 Reporting Round. Available at:
,DEFRA (2007a). Conserving Biodiversity in a Changing Climate: Guidance on Building Capacity to Adapt. London: DEFRA. Available at:
,DEFRA (2007b). Environmental Information Regulations: Exceptions. Available at
,DEFRA (2007c). Guidance for Public Authorities on Implementing the Biodiversity Duty. Available at
Firbank, L. G., Barr, C. J., Bunce, R. G. al. (2003). Assessing stock and change in land cover and biodiversity in GB: an introduction to Countryside Survey 2000. Journal of Environmental Management 67, 207–218.
Flowerdew, J. R. (2004). Advances in the conservation of British mammals, 1954–2004: 50 years of progress with the Mammal Society. Mammal Review 34, 169–210.
Gillett, S. and Lawrence, A., editors (2003). Why Involve Volunteers in Biodiversity Monitoring? Summary of the BioWatch UK workshop, 20th October 2003. BioWatch UK Workshop. Oxford, UK. Available at:
Gouveia, C., Fonseca, A., Camara, A., and Ferreira, F. (2004). Promoting the use of environmental data collected by concerned citizens through information and communication technologies. Journal of Environmental Management 71, 135–154.
Greenwood, J. J. D. (2003). The monitoring of British breeding birds: a success story for conservation science?Science of the Total Environment 310, 221–230.
Hartley, N. and Wood, C.. (2005). Public participation in environmental impact assessment – implementing the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 319–340.
Hopkins, G. W. and Freckleton, R. P. (2002). Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation 5, 245–249.
Key, R. S. (1993). The use of biological records to protect a Thames grazing marsh of national importance for invertebrates. In The Proceedings of the NFBR Conference: Crises and Biological Records, eds. Spalding, A. and French, C., pp. 20–22. Redruth, Cornwall: Institute of Cornish Studies, University of Exeter.
Lawrence, A. (2005). Reluctant citizens? The disjuncture between participatory biological monitoring and participatory environmental governance. Paper presented at the International Sociology Conference ‘Environment, Knowledge and Democracy’ 6–7 July 2005, Faculte des Sciences de Luminy, Marseilles, 2005. Available at:
Lawrence, A. (2006). “No Personal Motive?” Volunteers, biodiversity and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place and Environment 9, 279–298.
Lawrence, A. and Molteno, S., in press. From rationalism to reflexivity? Reflections on change in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. In Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods, eds. Brousseau, E., Dedeurwaerdere, T. and B. Siebenhüner. MIT Press.
Lawrence, A. and Turnhout, E. (2005). Personal meaning in the public space: the bureaucratization of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands. RGS-IBG Annual Conference, London, 2005.
Moss, S. (2004). A Bird in the Bush: a Social History of Birdwatching. London: Aurum.
,NBN (2006). The NBN concept, vol. 2007. Available at
,NFBR (2002). The Status of Local Records Centres in the UK, 2002. National Federation for Biological Recording. Available at
,NFBR (2004). LRCs and the Draft Environmental Information Regulations Code of Practice. National Federation of Biological Recording. Available at
Nicholson, E. (1931). The Art of Bird-Watching. London: Witherby.
Palmer, C. (2004). Functions of museums and record centres and how they have changed. Paper presented at the NFBR Conference. National Federation of Biological Recorders Conference, 2–3 July 2004, Cardiff, 2004.
Preston, C. D., Telfer, M. G., Arnold, H. al. (2002). The Changing Flora of the UK. London: DEFRA. Available at:
Warren, R. D. and Witter, M. S.. (2002). Monitoring trends in bat populations through roost surveys: methods and data from Rhinolophus hipposideros. Biological Conservation 105, 255–261.