Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: May 2014

Section 4 - Neural repair: basic cellular and molecular processes

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation
  • Online ISBN: 9780511995583
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511995583
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×

References

1. VilaM, PrzedborskiS. Targeting programmed cell death in neuro-degenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4: 365–75.
2. OppenheimRW, von BartheldCS. Programmed cell death and neurotrophic factors. In SquireL, BergD, BloomF, et al., eds. Fundamental Neuroscience 3rd edn. New York, NY: Elsevier, 2008; 437–68.
3. YuanJ, YanknerBA. Apoptosis in the nervous system. Nature 2000; 407: 802–9.
4. ElliottJL, SniderWD. Axotomy-induced motor neuron death. In KoliatosV,RatanR, eds. Cell Death and Diseases of the Nervous System. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1999; 181–95.
5. HiltDC, MillerJA, MaltaE. Early experiences with trophic factors as drugs for neurological disease: brain-derived neurotrophic factor and ciliary neurotrophic factor for ALS. In KoliatosV, RatanR, eds. Cell Death and Diseases of the Nervous System. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1999; 593–607.
6. GouldTW, OppenheimRW. Motor neuron trophic factors: therapeutic use in ALS?Brain Res Rev 2011; 67: 1–39.
7. HamburgerV. Regression versus peripheral control of differentiation in motor hypoplasia. Am J Anat 1958; 102: 365–409.
8. GouldTW, EnomotoH. Neurotrophic modulation of motor neuron development. Neuroscientist 2009; 15: 105–16.
9. SavillJ, GregoryC, HaslettC. Cell biology Eat me or die. Science 2003; 302: 1516–17.
10. WyllieAH, KerrJF, CurrieAR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. Int Rev Cytol 1980; 68: 251–306.
11. ClarkePG, ClarkeS. Nineteenth century research on naturally occurring cell death and related phenomena. Anat Embryol (Berlin) 1996; 193: 81–99.
12. DattaSR, KatsovA, HuL, et al. 14–3–3 proteins and survival kinases cooperate to inactivate BAD by BH3 domain phosphorylation. Mol Cell 2000; 6: 41–51.
13. DegterevA, YuanJ. Expansion and evolution of cell death programmes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9: 378–90.
14. KourtisN, TavernarakisN. Autophagy and cell death in model organisms. Cell Death Differ 2009; 16: 21–30.
15. ChoDH, NakamuraT, LiptonSA. Mitochondrial dynamics in cell death and neurodegeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010; 67: 3435–47.
16. LamkanfiM, FestjensN, DeclercqW, et al. Caspases in cell survival, proliferation and differentiation. Cell Death Differ 2007; 14: 44–55.
17. LiZ, JoJ, JiaJM, et al. Caspase-3 activation via mitochondria is required for long-term depression and AMPA receptor internalization. Cell 2010; 141: 859–71.
18. MallatM, Marín-TevaJL, ChéretC. Phagocytosis in the developing CNS: more than clearing the corpses. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005; 15: 101–7.
19. WiegandUK, CorbachS, PrescottAR, et al. The trigger to cell death determines the efficiency with which dying cells are cleared by neighbours. Cell Death Differ 2001; 8: 734–46.
20. ElliottMR, ChekeniFB, TrampontPC, et al. Nucleotides released by apoptotic cells act as a find-me signal to promote phagocytic clearance. Nature 2009; 461: 282–6.
21. LauberK, BohnE, KröberSM, et al. Apoptotic cells induce migration of phagocytes via caspase-3-mediated release of a lipid attraction signal. Cell 2003; 113: 717–30.
22. KinchenJM, RavichandranKS. Journey to the grave: signaling events regulating removal of apoptotic cells. J Cell Sci 2007; 120: 2143–9.
23. JellingerKA. Basic mechanisms of neurodegeneration: a critical update. J Cell Mol Med 2010; 14: 457–87.
24. RangasamySB, SoderstromK, BakayRA, et al. Neurotrophic factor therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Prog Brain Res 2010; 184: 237–64.
25. CourchesneE, PierceK, SchumannCM, et al. Mapping early brain development in autism. Neuron 2007; 56: 399–413.
26. YounkinSG. The role of Ab42 in Alzheimer’s disease. J Physiol (Paris) 1998; 92: 289–92.
27. ZhengH, KooEH. The amyloid precursor protein: beyond amyloid. Mol Neurodegener 2006; 1: 5.
28. SmithMA, DrewKL, NunomuraA, et al. Amyloid-beta, tau alterations and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer disease: the chickens or the eggs?Neurochem Int 2002; 40: 527–31.
29. CooksonMR. A-Synuclein and neuronal cell death. Mol Neurodegener 2009; 4: 9.
30. CelsiF, PizzoP, BriniM, et al. Mitochondria, calcium and cell death: a deadly triad in neurodegeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009; 1787: 335–44.
31. MariesE, DassB, CollierTJ, et al. The role of alpha-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease: insights from animal models. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4: 727–3.
32. The Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 1993; 72: 971–83.
33. LiSH, LiXJ. Huntingtin and its role in neuronal degeneration. Neuroscientist 2004; 10: 467–75.
34. BrownRH Jr. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: recent insights from genetics and transgenic mice. Cell 1995; 80: 687–92.
35. TraubR, MitsumotoH, RowlandLP. Research advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 2009 to 2010. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2011; 11: 67–77.
36. DengHX, ChenW, HongST, et al. Mutations in UBQLN2 cause dominant X-linked juvenile and adult-onset ALS and ALS/dementia. Nature 2011; 477: 211–15.
37. Dejesus-HernandezM, MackenzieIR, BoeveBF, et al. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011; 72: 245–56.
38. RentonAE, MajounieE, WaiteA, et al. A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 2011; 72: 257–68.
39. KaoAW, EisenhutRJ, MartensLH, et al. A neurodegenerative disease mutation that accelerates the clearance of apoptotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108: 4441–6.
40. MiglioreL, CoppedèF. Environmental-induced oxidative stress in neurodegenerative disorders and aging. Mutat Res 2009; 674: 73–84.
41. WangY, QinZH. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of excitotoxic neuronal death. Apoptosis 2010; 15: 1382–402.
42. KnottAB, PerkinsG, SchwarzenbacherR, et al. Mitochondrial fragmentation in neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9: 505–18.
43. MartinLJ. Mitochondrial pathobiology in Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Alzheimers Dis 2010; 20: S335–56.
44. LiH, ChenY, JonesAF, et al. Bcl-xL induces Drp1-dependent synapse formation in cultured hippocampal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105: 2169–74.
45. BermanSB, PinedaFJ, HardwickJM. Mitochondrial fission and fusion dynamics: the long and short of it. Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 1147–52.
46. WakabayashiT. Megamitochondria formation–physiology and pathology. J Cell Mol Med 2002; 6: 497–538.
47. BermanSB, ChenYB, QiB, et al. Bcl-x L increases mitochondrial fission, fusion, and biomass in neurons. J Cell Biol 2009; 184: 707–19.
48. HickmanJA, HardwickJM, KaczmarekLK, JonasEA, et al. cl-xL inhibitor ABT-737 reveals a dual role for Bcl-xL in synaptic transmission. J Neurophysiol 2008; 99: 1515–22.
49. KarbowskiM, LeeYJ, GaumeB, et al. Spatial and temporal association of Bax with mitochondrial fission sites, Drp1, and Mfn2 during apoptosis. J Cell Biol 2002; 159: 931–8.
50. KarbowskiM, NorrisKL, ClelandMM, et al. Role of Bax and Bak in mitochondrial morphogenesis. Nature 2006; 443: 658–62.
51. WangH, LimPJ, KarbowskiM, et al. Effects of overexpression of huntingtin proteins on mitochondrial integrity. Hum Mol Genet 2009; 18: 737–52.
52. ChooYS, JohnsonGV, MacDonaldM, et al. Mutant huntingtin directly increases susceptibility of mitochondria to the calcium-induced permeability transition and cytochrome c release. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13: 1407–20.
53. MagranéJ, ManfrediG. Mitochondrial function, morphology, and axonal transport in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009; 11: 1615–26.
54. ManfrediG, XuZ. Mitochondrial dysfunction and its role in motor neuron degeneration in ALS. Mitochondrion 2005; 5: 77–87.
55. ShiP, WeiY, ZhangJ, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a converging point of multiple pathological pathways in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Alzheimers Dis 2010; 20: S311–24.
56. MurakamiT, NagaiM, MiyazakiK, et al. Early decrease of mitochondrial DNA repair enzymes in spinal motor neurons of presymptomatic transgenic mice carrying a mutant SOD1 gene. Brain Res 2007; 1150: 182–9.
57. ReddyPH, ReddyTP, ManczakM, et al. Dynamin-related protein 1 and mitochondrial fragmentation in neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res Rev 2011; 67: 103–18.
58. IsraelsonA, ArbelN, Da CruzS, et al. Misfolded mutant SOD1 directly inhibits VDAC1 conductance in a mouse model of inherited ALS. Neuron 2010; 67: 575–87.
59. PedriniS, SauD, GuareschiS, et al. ALS-linked mutant SOD1 damages mitochondria by promoting conformational changes in Bcl-2. Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19: 2974–86.
60. VabulasRM, HartlFU. Aberrant protein interactions in amyloid disease. Cell Cycle 2011; 10: 1512–13.
61. KaushikS, CuervoAM. Autophagy as a cell-repair mechanism: activation of chaperone-mediated autophagy during oxidative stress. Mol Aspects Med 2006; 27: 444–54.
62. LüdersJ, DemandJ, HöhfeldJ. The ubiquitin-related BAG-1 provides a link between the molecular chaperones Hsc70/Hsp70 and the proteasome. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 4613–17.
63. RitossaF. A new puffing pattern induced by termperature shock and DNP in Drosophila. Experientia 1962; 15: 571–3.
64. RitossaF. Discovery of the heat shock response. Cell Stress Chaperones 1996; 1: 97–8.
65. KregelKC. Heat shock proteins: modifying factors in physiological stress responses and acquired thermotolerance. J Appl Physiol 2002; 92: 2177–86.
66. MorimotoRI, KlineMP, BimstonDN, et al. The heat-shock response: regulation and function of heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones. Essays Biochem 1997; 32: 17–29.
67. SchlesingerMJ. Heat shock proteins. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 12111–14.
68. WelchWJ. Mammalian stress response: cell physiology, structure/function of stress proteins, and implications for medicine and disease. Physiol Rev 1992; 72: 1063–81.
69. PirkkalaL, NykanenP, SistonenL. Roles of the heat shock transcription factors in regulation of the heat shock response and beyond. Faseb J 2001; 15: 1118–31.
70. OstlingP, BjörkJK, Roos-MattjusP, et al. Heat shock factor 2 (HSF2) contributes to inducible expression of hsp genes through interplay with HSF1. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 7077–86.
71. SantoroMG. Heat shock factors and the control of the stress response. Biochem Pharmacol 2000; 59: 55–63.
72. MorimotoRI. Cells in stress: transcriptional activation of heat shock genes. Science 1993; 259: 1409–10.
73. AhnSG, ThieleDJ. Redox regulation of mammalian heat shock factor 1 is essential for Hsp gene activation and protection from stress. Genes Dev 2003; 17: 516–28.
74. ZhongM, OroszA, WuC. Direct sensing of heat and oxidation by Drosophila heat shock transcription factor. Mol Cell 1998; 2: 101–8.
75. ChangY, OstlingP, AkerfeltM, et al. Role of heat-shock factor 2 in cerebral cortex formation and as a regulator of p35 expression. Genes Dev 2006; 20: 836–47.
76. StacchiottiA, RezzaniR, RodellaL, et al. Cell-specific expression of heat shock transcription factors 1 and 2 in unstressed rat spinal cord. Neurosci Lett 1999; 268: 73–6.
77. WalshD, LiZ, WuY, NagataK. et al. Heat shock and the role of the HSPs during neural plate induction in early mammalian CNS and brain development. Cell Mol Life Sci 1997; 53: 198–211.
78. WangX, GrammatikakisN, SiganouA, et al. Regulation of molecular chaperone gene transcription involves the serine phosphorylation, 14–3–3 epsilon binding, and cytoplasmic sequestration of heat shock factor 1. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23: 6013–26.
79. HommaS, JinX, WangG, et al. Demyelination, astrogliosis, and accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, hallmarks of CNS disease in hsf1-deficient mice. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 7974–86.
80. HuY, MivechiNF. HSF-1 interacts with Ral-binding protein 1 in a stress-responsive, multiprotein complex with HSP90 in vivo. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 17299–306.
81. BuL, JinY, ShiY, et al. Mutant DNA-binding domain of HSF4 is associated with autosomal dominant lamellar and Marner cataract. Nat Genet 2002; 31: 276–8.
82. AkerfeltM, TrouilletD, MezgerV, et al. Heat shock factors at a crossroad between stress and development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1113: 15–27.
83. Robinson, MB, Gifondorwa, DJ, MilliganC. Mechanisms of the motoneuron stress response and its relevance in neurodegeneration. In McNeillAS, ed. Neurodegeneration: Theory, Disorders and Treatments. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers, 2010.
84. HuangL, ChenCH. Proteasome regulators: activators and inhibitors. Curr Med Chem 2009; 16: 931–9.
85. LantonenL. Nucleolar aggresomes as counterparts of cytoplasmic aggresomes in proteotoxic stress. Bioessays 2011; 33: 386–95.
86. AikenCT, KaakeRM, WangX, et al. Oxidative stress-mediated regulation of proteasome complexes. Mol Cell proteomics 2011; 10: 1–11.
87. SaxenaS, CaroniP. Selective neuronal vulnerability in neurodegenerative diseases: from stressor thresholds to degeneration. Neuron 2011; 71: 35–48.
88. AtkinJD, FargMA, TurnerBJ, et al. Induction of the unfolded protein response in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and association of protein-disulfide isomerase with superoxide dismutase 1. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 30152–65.
89. KikuchiH, AlmerG, YamashitaS, et al. Spinal cord endoplasmic reticulum stress associated with a microsomal accumulation of mutant superoxide dismutase-1 in an ALS model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 6025–30.
90. NagataT, IlievaH, MurakamiT, et al. Increased ER stress during motor neuron degeneration in a transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurol Res 2007; 29: 767–71.
91. TobisawaS, HozumiY, ArawakaS, et al. Mutant SOD1 linked to familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, but not wild-type SOD1, induces ER stress in COS7 cells and transgenic mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 303: 496–503.
92. UrushitaniM, EzziSA, MatsuoA, et al. The endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi pathway is a target for translocation and aggregation of mutant superoxide dismutase linked to ALS. FASEB J 2008; 22: 2476–87.
93. SaxenaS, CabuyE, CaroniP. A role for motoneuron subtype-selective ER stress in disease manifestations of FALS mice. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 627–36.
94. BanerjeeR, BealMF, ThomasB. Autophagy in neurodegenerative disorders: pathogenic roles and therapeutic implications. Trends Neurosci 2010; 33: 541–9.
95. KroemerG, LevineB. Autophagic cell death: the story of a misnomer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9: 1004–10.
96. YangZ, KlionskyDJ. Eaten alive: a history of macroautophagy. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12: 814–22.
97. HastyP. Rapamycin: the cure for all that ails. J Mol Cell Biol 2010; 2: 17–19.
98. MizushimaN, LevineB, CuervoAM, et al. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 2008; 451: 1069–75.
99. WongE, CuervoAM. Autophagy gone awry in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13: 805–11.
100. NairU, JotwaniA, GengJ, et al. SNARE proteins are required for macroautophagy. Cell 2011; 146: 290–302.
101. KomatsuM, IchimuraY. Physiological significance of selective degradation of p62 by autophagy. FEBS Lett 2010; 584: 1374–8.
102. RavikumarB, Acevedo-ArozenaA, ImarisioS, et al. Dynein mutations impair autophagic clearance of aggregate-prone proteins. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 771–6.
103. KlionskyDJ, OhsumiY. Vacuolar import of proteins and organelles from the cytoplasm. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1999; 15: 1–32.
104. EskelinenEL, IllertAL, TanakaY, et al. Role of LAMP-2 in lysosome biogenesis and autophagy. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13: 3355–68.
105. IwataA, RileyBE, JohnstonJA, et al. HDAC6 and microtubules are required for autophagic degradation of aggregated huntingtin. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 40282–92.
106. HaraT, NakamuraK, MatsuiM, et al. Suppression of basal autophagy in neural cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature 2006; 441: 885–9.
107. KomatsuM, WaguriS, ChibaT, et al. Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice. Nature 2006; 441: 880–4.
108. TanakaY, GuhdeG, SuterA, et al. Accumulation of autophagic vacuoles and cardiomyopathy in LAMP-2-deficient mice. Nature 2000; 406: 902–6.
109. Portera-CailliauC, HedreenJC, PriceDL, et al. Evidence for apoptotic cell death in Huntington disease and excitotoxic animal models. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 3775–87.
110. GafniJ, HermelE, YoungJE, et al. Inhibition of calpain cleavage of huntingtin reduces toxicity: accumulation of calpain/caspase fragments in the nucleus. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 20211–20.
111. WellingtonCL, EllerbyLM, GutekunstCA, et al. Caspase cleavage of mutant huntingtin precedes neurodegeneration in Huntington’s disease. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 7862–72.
112. Tellez-NagelI, JohnsonAB, TerryRD. Studies on brain biopsies of patients with Huntington’s chorea. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1974; 33: 308–32.
113. RavikumarB, VacherC, BergerZ, et al. Inhibition of mTOR induces autophagy and reduces toxicity of polyglutamine expansions in fly and mouse models of Huntington disease. Nat Genet 2004; 36: 585–95.
114. RavikumarB, DudenR, RubinszteinDC. Aggregate-prone proteins with polyglutamine and polyalanine expansions are degraded by autophagy. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11: 1107–17.
115. SarkarS, DaviesJE, HuangZ, et al. Trehalose, a novel mTOR-independent autophagy enhancer, accelerates the clearance of mutant huntingtin and alpha-synuclein. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 5641–52.
116. BauerPO, GoswamiA, WongHK, et al. Harnessing chaperone-mediated autophagy for the selective degradation of mutant huntingtin protein. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28: 256–63.
117. PandeyUB, NieZ, BatleviY, et al. HDAC6 rescues neurodegeneration and provides an essential link between autophagy and the UPS. Nature 2007; 447: 859–63.
118. LevyOA, MalageladaC, GreeneLA. Cell death pathways in Parkinson’s disease: proximal triggers, distal effectors, and final steps. Apoptosis 2009; 14: 478–500.
119. AngladeP, VyasS, Javoy-AgidF, et al. Apoptosis and autophagy in nigral neurons of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Histol Histopathol 1997; 12: 25–31.
120. ZhuJH, GuoF, ShelburneJ, et al. Localization of phosphorylated ERK/MAP kinases to mitochondria and autophagosomes in Lewy body diseases. Brain Pathol 2003; 13: 473.
121. CuervoAM, StefanisL, FredenburgR, et al. Impaired degradation of mutant alpha-synuclein by chaperone-mediated autophagy. Science 2004; 305: 1292–5.
122. YangQ, SheH, GearingM, et al. Regulation of neuronal survival factor MEF2D by chaperone-mediated autophagy. Science 2009; 323: 124–7.
123. MatsudaN, SatoS, ShibaK, et al. PINK1 stabilized by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy. J Cell Biol 2010; 189: 211–21.
124. LeeJY, NaganoY, TaylorJP, et al. Disease-causing mutations in parkin impair mitochondrial ubiquitination, aggregation, and HDAC6-dependent mitophagy. J Cell Biol 2010; 189: 671–9.
125. DehayB, BoveJ, Rodriguez-MuelaN, et al. Pathogenic lysosomal depletion in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 12535–44.
126. GouldTW, BussRR, VinsantS, et al. Complete dissociation of motor neuron death from motor dysfunction by Bax deletion in a mouse model of ALS. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 8774–86.
127. LairdFM, FarahMH, AckerleyS, et al. Motor neuron disease occurring in a mutant dynactin mouse model is characterized by defects in vesicular trafficking. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 1997–2005.
128. MorimotoN, NagaiM, OhtaY, et al. Increased autophagy in transgenic mice with a G93A mutant SOD1 gene. Brain Res 2007; 1167: 112–17.
129. CrippaV, SauD, RusminiP, et al. The small heat shock protein B8 (HspB8) promotes autophagic removal of misfolded proteins involved in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19: 3440–56.
130. HetzC, ThielenP, MatusS, et al. XBP-1 deficiency in the nervous system protects against amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by increasing autophagy. Genes Dev 2009; 23: 2294–306.
131. LeeJA, LiuL, GaoFB. Autophagy defects contribute to neurodegeneration induced by dysfunctional ESCRT-III. Autophagy 2009; 5: 1070–2.
132. ParkinsonN, IncePG, SmithMO, et al. ALS phenotypes with mutations in CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2B). Neurology 2006; 67: 1074–7.
133. FilimonenkoM, StuffersS, RaiborgC, et al. Functional multivesicular bodies are required for autophagic clearance of protein aggregates associated with neurodegenerative disease. J Cell Biol 2007; 179: 485–500.
134. PriceJL, KoAI, WadeMJ, et al. Neuron number in the entorhinal cortex and CA1 in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 1395–402.
135. WestMJ, ColemanPD, FloodDG, et al. Differences in the pattern of hippocampal neuronal loss in normal ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 1994; 344: 769–72.
136. Gómez-IslaT, PriceJL, McKeelDW Jr, et al. Profound loss of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons occurs in very mild Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 4491–500.
137. ColursoGJ, NilsonJE, VervoortLG. Quantitative assessment of DNA fragmentation and beta-amyloid deposition in insular cortex and midfrontal gyrus from patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Life Sci 2003; 73: 1795–803.
138. NixonRA. Autophagy, amyloidogenesis and Alzheimer disease. J Cell Sci 2007; 120: 4081–91.
139. CataldoAM, PeterhoffCM, SchmidtSD, et al. Presenilin mutations in familial Alzheimer disease and transgenic mouse models accelerate neuronal lysosomal pathology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2004; 63: 821–30.
140. PickfordF, MasliahE, BritschgiM, et al. The autophagy-related protein beclin 1 shows reduced expression in early Alzheimer disease and regulates amyloid beta accumulation in mice. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 2190–9.
141. SpilmanP, PodlutskayaN, HartMJ, et al. Inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin abolishes cognitive deficits and reduces amyloid-beta levels in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 2010; 5: e9979.
142. BergerZ, RavikumarB, MenziesFM, et al. Rapamycin alleviates toxicity of different aggregate-prone proteins. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15: 433–42.
143. WangT, LaoU, EdgarBA. TOR-mediated autophagy regulates cell death in Drosophila neurodegenerative disease. J Cell Biol 2009; 186: 703–11.
144. CopaniA, UbertiD, SortinoMA, et al. Activation of cell-cycle-associated proteins in neuronal death: a mandatory or dispensable path?Trends Neurosci 2001; 24: 25–31.
145. BoyceM, YuanJ. Cellular response to endoplasmic reticulum stress: a matter of life or death. Cell Death Differ 2006; 13: 363–73.
146. LindholmD, WootzH, KorhonenL. ER stress and neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Death Differ 2006; 13: 385–92.
147. PrahladV, MorimotoRI. Integrating the stress response: lessons for neurodegenerative diseases from C. elegans. Trends Cell Biol 2009; 19: 52–61.

References

1. WallerA. Experiments on the section of glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves of the frog and observations of the alternatives produced thereby in the structure of their primitive fibers. Philos Trans Roy Soc London 1850; 140: 423–9.
2. ZelenaJ, LubinskaL, GutmannE. Accumulation of organelles at the ends of interrupted axons. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 1968; 91: 200–19.
3. RanishN, OchsS. Fast axoplasmic transport of acetylcholinesterase in mammalian nerve fibres. J Neurochem 1972; 19: 2641–9.
4. GriffinJW, PriceDL, EngelWK, et al. The pathogenesis of reactive axonal swellings: role of axonal transport. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1977; 36: 214–27.
5. GlassJD, GriffinJW. Neurofilament redistribution in transected nerves: evidence for bidirectional transport of neurofilaments. J Neurosci 1991; 11: 3146–54.
6. HoffmanPN, LasekRJ. The slow component of axonal transport. Identification of major structural polypeptides of the axon and their generality among mammalian neurons. J Cell Biol 1975; 66: 351–66.
7. HirokawaN, GlicksmanMA, WillardMB. Organization of mammalian neurofilament polypeptides within the neuronal cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol 1984; 98: 1523–36.
8. BallinRH, ThomasPK. Changes at the nodes of Ranvier during Wallerian degeneration: an electron microscope study. Acta Neuropathol 1969; 14: 237–49.
9. LubinskaL. Early course of Wallerian degeneration in myelinated fibres of the rat phrenic nerve. Brain Res 1977; 130: 47–63.
10. LubinskaL. Patterns of Wallerian degeneration of myelinated fibres in short and long peripheral stumps and in isolated segments of rat phrenic nerve. Interpretation of the role of axoplasmic flow of the trophic factor. Brain Res 1982; 233: 227–40.
11. MilediR, SlaterCR. On the degeneration of rat neuromuscular junctions after nerve section. J Physiol 1970; 207: 507–28.
12. CancalonP. Influence of temperature on various mechanisms associated with neuronal growth and nerve regeneration. Prog Neurobiol 1985; 25: 27–92.
13. TsaoJW, GeorgeEB, GriffinJW. Temperature modulation reveals three distinct stages of Wallerian degeneration. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 4718–26.
14. CancalonP. Proximodistal degeneration of C-fibers detached from their perikarya. J Cell Biol 1983; 97: 6–14.
15. GeorgeR, GriffinJW. The proximo-distal spread of axonal degeneration in the dorsal columns of the rat. J Neurocytol 1994; 23: 657–67.
16. ChaudhryV, GlassJD, GriffinJW. Wallerian degeneration in peripheral nerve disease. Neurol Clin 1992; 10: 613–27.
17. FransonP, RonneviLO. Myelin breakdown and elimination in the posterior funiculus of the adult cat after dorsal rhizotomy: a light and electron microscopic qualitative and quantitative study. J Comp Neurol 1984; 223: 138–51.
18. SchlaepferWW, BungeRP. Effects of calcium ion concentration on the degeneration of amputated axons in tissue culture. J Cell Biol 1973; 59: 456–70.
19. GeorgeEB, GlassJD, GriffinJW. Axotomy-induced axonal degeneration is mediated by calcium influx through ion-specific channels. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 6445–52.
20. GlassJD, SchryerBL, GriffinJW. Calcium-mediated degeneration of the axonal cytoskeleton in the Ola mouse. J Neurochem 1994; 62: 2472–5.
21. SchlaepferWW, MickoS. Calcium-dependent alterations of neurofilament proteins of rat peripheral nerve. J Neurochem 1979; 32: 211–19.
22. SchlaepferWW. Calcium-induced degeneration of axoplasm in isolated segments of rat peripheral nerve. Brain Res 1974; 69: 203–15.
23. SchlaepferWW, HaslerMB. Characterization of the calcium-induced disruption of neurofilaments in rat peripheral nerve. Brain Res 1979; 168: 299–309.
24. StysPK, RansomBR, WaxmanSG. Effects of polyvalent cations and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers on recovery of CNS white matter from anoxia. Neurosci Lett 1990; 115: 293–9.
25. StysPK, WaxmanSG, RansomBR. Na(+)-Ca2+ exchanger mediates Ca2+ influx during anoxia in mammalian central nervous system white matter. Ann Neurol 1991; 30: 375–80.
26. AgulloL, GarciaA. Different receptors mediate stimulation of nitric oxide-dependent cyclic GMP formation in neurons and astrocytes in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992; 182: 1362–8.
27. OuardouzM, NikolaevaMA, CoderreE, et al. Depolarization-induced Ca2+ release in ischemic spinal cord white matter involves L-type Ca2+ channel activation of ryanodine receptors. Neuron 2003; 40: 53–63.
28. GlassJD, BrushartTM, GeorgeEB, et al. Prolonged survival of transected nerve fibres in C57BL/Ola mice is an intrinsic characteristic of the axon. J Neurocytol 1993; 22: 311–21.
29. LunnER, PerryVH, BrownMC, et al. Absence of Wallerian degeneration does not hinder regeneration in peripheral nerve. Eur J Neurosci 1989; 1: 27–33.
30. PerryVH, BrownMC, LunnER, et al. Evidence that very slow Wallerian degeneration in C57BL/Ola mice is an intrinsic property of the peripheral nerve. Eur J Neurosci 1990; 2: 802–8.
31. PerryVH, LunnER, BrownMC, et al. Evidence that the rate of Wallerian degeneration is controlled by a single autosomal dominant gene. Eur J Neurosci 1990; 2: 408–13.
32. DeckwerthTL, JohnsonEM Jr. Neurites can remain viable after destruction of the neuronal soma by programmed cell death (apoptosis). Dev Biol 1994; 165: 63–72.
33. ConfortiL, JaneckovaL, WagnerD, et al. Reducing expression of NAD+ synthesizing enzyme NMNAT1 does not affect the rate of Wallerian degeneration. FEBS J 2011; 278: 2666–79.
34. ArakiT, SasakiY, MilbrandtJ. Increased nuclear NAD biosynthesis and SIRT1 activation prevent axonal degeneration. Science 2004; 305: 1010–13.
35. SasakiY, VohraBP, BalohRH, et al. Transgenic mice expressing the Nmnat1 protein manifest robust delay in axonal degeneration in vivo. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 6526–34.
36. WangJ, ZhaiQ, ChenY, et al. A local mechanism mediates NAD-dependent protection of axon degeneration. J Cell Biol 2005; 170: 349–55.
37. ConfortiL, FangG, BeirowskiB, et al. NAD(+) and axon degeneration revisited: Nmnat1 cannot substitute for Wld(S) to delay Wallerian degeneration. Cell Death Differ 2007; 14: 116–27.
38. AveryMA, SheehanAE, KerrKS, et al. Wld S requires Nmnat1 enzymatic activity and N16-VCP interactions to suppress Wallerian degeneration. J Cell Biol 2009; 184: 501–13.
39. ConfortiL, WilbreyA, MorrealeG, et al. Wld S protein requires Nmnat activity and a short N-terminal sequence to protect axons in mice. J Cell Biol 2009; 184: 491–500.
40. YahataN, YuasaS, ArakiT. Nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase expression in mitochondrial matrix delays Wallerian degeneration. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 6276–84.
41. LaserH, ConfortiL, MorrealeG, et al. The slow Wallerian degeneration protein, WldS, binds directly to VCP/p97 and partially redistributes it within the nucleus. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17: 1075–84.
42. ColemanMP, FreemanMR. Wallerian degeneration, wld(s), and nmnat. Annu Rev Neurosci 2010; 33: 245–67.
43. BabettoE, BeirowskiB, JaneckovaL, et al. Targeting NMNAT1 to axons and synapses transforms its neuroprotective potency in vivo. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 13291–304.
44. PressC, MilbrandtJ. Nmnat delays axonal degeneration caused by mitochondrial and oxidative stress. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 4861–71.
45. SasakiY, ArakiT, MilbrandtJ. Stimulation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide biosynthetic pathways delays axonal degeneration after axotomy. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 8484–91.
46. OsterlohJM, YangJ, RooneyTM, et al. dSarm/Sarm1 is required for activation of an injury-induced axon death pathway. Science 2012; 337: 481–4.
47. DyckPJ, ThomasPK, AsburyAK, et al. Diabetic Neuropathy. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, 1987.
48. SingletonJR, SmithAG, BrombergMB. Painful sensory polyneuropathy associated with impaired glucose tolerance. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 1225–8.
49. SingletonJR, SmithAG, BrombergMB. Increased prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance in patients with painful sensory neuropathy. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1448–53.
50. SumnerCJ, ShethS, GriffinJW, et al. The spectrum of neuropathy in diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. Neurology 2003; 60: 108–11.
51. BlumAS, Dal PanGJ, FeinbergJ, et al. Low-dose zalcitabine-related toxic neuropathy: frequency, natural history, and risk factors. Neurology 1996; 46: 999–1003.
52. CornblathDR, McArthurJC. Peripheral neuropathies in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. In AsburyAK, ThomasPK, eds. Peripheral Nerve Disorders. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1995; 223–37.
53. SoYT, EngstromJW, OlneyRK. The spectrum of electrodiagnostic abnormalities in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Muscle Nerve 1990; 13: 855.
54. ChaudhryV, RowinskyEK, SartoriusSE, et al. Peripheral neuropathy from taxol and cisplatin combination chemotherapy: clinical and electrophysiological studies. Ann Neurol 1994; 35: 304–11.
55. HollandNR, CrawfordTO, HauerP, et al. Small-fiber sensory neuropathies: clinical course and neuropathology of idiopathic cases. Ann Neurol 1998; 44: 47–59.
56. PeriquetMI, NovakV, CollinsMP, et al. Painful sensory neuropathy: prospective evaluation using skin biopsy. Neurology 1999; 53: 1641–7.
57. SpencerPS, SchaumburgHH. Central–peripheral distal axonopathy – the pathogenesis of dying-back polyneuropathies. In ZimmermanH, ed. Progress in Neuropathology. New York, NY: Grune and Stratton, 1976; 253–95.
58. SpencerPS, Schaumburg HH. Ultrastructural studies of the dying-back process. III. The evolution of experimental peripheral giant axonal degeneration. J Neuropath Exp Neurol 1977; 36: 276–99.
59. PerlsonE, MadayS, FuMM, et al. Retrograde axonal transport: pathways to cell death?Trends Neurosci 2010; 33: 335–44.
60. LehmannHC, ChenW, BorzanJ, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in distal axons contributes to human immunodeficiency virus sensory neuropathy. Ann Neurol 2011; 69: 100–10.
61. XiaoWH, ZhengH, ZhengFY, et al. Mitochondrial abnormality in sensory, but not motor, axons in paclitaxel-evoked painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat. Neuroscience 2011; 199: 461–9.
62. GreenbergSG, LasekRJ. Neurofilament protein synthesis in DRG neurons decreases more after peripheral axotomy than after central axotomy. J Neurosci 1988; 8: 1739–46.
63. HoffmanPN, ClevelandDW, GriffinJW, et al. Neurofilament gene expression: a major determinant of axonal caliber. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1987; 84: 3472–6.
64. HoffmanPN. Distinct roles of neurofilament and tubulin gene expression in axonal growth. Ciba Found Symp 1988; 138: 192–204.
65. HoffmanPN, GriffinJW, PriceDL. Control of axonal caliber by neurofilament transport. J Cell Biol 1984; 99: 705–14.
66. HoffmanPN, KooEH, MumaEN, et al. Role of neurofilaments in the control of axonal caliber in myelinated nerve fibers. In LasekRJ, BlackMM, eds. Intrinsic Determinants of Neuronal Form and Function. New York,NY: Alan R. Liss, 1988; 389–402.
67. HoffmanPN, ThompsonGW, GriffinJW, et al. Changes in neurofilament transport coincide temporally with alterations in the caliber of axons in regenerating motor fibers. J Cell Biol 1985; 101: 1332–40.
68. HoffmanPN, ClevelandDW. Neurofilament and tubulin expression recapitulates the developmental program during axonal regeneration: induction of a specific beta-tubulin isotype. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1988; 85: 4530–3.
69. RamerMS, PriestleyJV, McMahonSB. Functional regeneration of sensory axons into the adult spinal cord. Nature 2000; 403: 312–16.
70. LuP, YangH, JonesLL, et al. Combinatorial therapy with neurotrophins and cAMP promotes axonal regeneration beyond sites of spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 6402–9.
71. QiuJ, CaiD, DaiH, et al. Spinal axon regeneration induced by elevation of cyclic AMP. Neuron 2002; 34: 895–903.
72. ViaderA, GoldenJP, BalohRH, et al. Schwann cell mitochondrial metabolism supports long-term axonal survival and peripheral nerve function. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 10128–40.
73. KeswaniSC, BuldanliogluU, FischerA, et al. A novel endogenous erythropoietin mediated pathway prevents axonal degeneration. Ann Neurol 2004; 56: 815–26.
74. MelliG, KeswaniSC, FischerA, et al. Spatially distinct and functionally independent mechanisms of axonal degeneration in a model of HIV-associated sensory neuropathy. Brain 2006; 129: 1330–8.
75. KeswaniSC, Bosch-MarceM, ReedN, et al. Nitric oxide prevents axonal degeneration by inducing HIF-1-dependent expression of erythropoietin. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108: 4986–90.
76. TrappBD, PetersonJ, RansohoffRM, et al. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 278–85.
77. BjartmarC, WujekJR, TrappBD. Axonal loss in the pathology of MS: consequences for understanding the progressive phase of the disease. J Neurol Sci 2003; 206: 165–71.
78. WujekJR, BjartmarC, RicherE, et al. Axon loss in the spinal cord determines permanent neurological disability in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2002; 61: 23–32.
79. SchneiderA, AraujoGW, TrajkovicK, et al. Hyperphosphorylation and aggregation of tau in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 55833–9.
80. GriffinJW, SheikhK. Schwann cell-axon interactions in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 883: 77–90.
81. GarbernJY, YoolDA, MooreGJ, et al. Patients lacking the major CNS myelin protein, proteolipid protein 1, develop length-dependent axonal degeneration in the absence of demyelination and inflammation. Brain 2002; 125: 551–61.
82. ShyME, GarbernJY, KamholzJ. Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies: a biological perspective. Lancet Neurol 2002; 1: 110–18.
83. BercianoJ, CombarrosO, FigolsJ, et al. Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type II. Clinicopathological study of a family. Brain 1986; 109: 897–914.
84. KrajewskiKM, LewisRA, FuerstDR, et al. Neurological dysfunction and axonal degeneration in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Brain 2000; 123: 1516–27.
85. MartiniR, ToykaKV. Immune-mediated components of hereditary demyelinating neuropathies: lessons from animal models and patients. Lancet Neurol 2004; 3: 457–65.
86. HsiehST, KiddGJ, CrawfordTO, et al. Regional modulation of neurofilament organization by myelination in normal axons. J Neurosci 1994; 14: 6392–401.
87. AguayoAJ, AttiwellM, TrecartenJ, et al. Abnormal myelination in transplanted Trembler mouse Schwann cells. Nature 1977; 265: 73–5.
88. de WaeghSM, LeeVM, BradyST. Local modulation of neurofilament phosphorylation, axonal caliber, and slow axonal transport by myelinating Schwann cells. Cell 1992; 68: 451–63.
89. YeungKB, ThomasPK, KingRH, et al. The clinical spectrum of peripheral neuropathies associated with benign monoclonal IgM, IgG and IgA paraproteinaemia. Comparative clinical, immunological and nerve biopsy findings. J Neurol 1991; 238: 383–91.
90. SternbergerLA, SternbergerNH. Monoclonal antibodies distinguish phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of neurofilaments in situ. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1983; 80: 6126–30.
91. GombaultFAA. Contribution a l’histoire anatomique de l’atrophie musculaire saturnine. Arch de Physiol 1873; 5: 592.
92. RaineCS, WisniewskiH, PrineasJ. An ultrastructural study of experimental demyelination and remyelination. II. Chronic experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in the peripheral nervous system. Lab Invest 1969; 21: 316–27.
93. GarciaML, LobsigerCS, ShahSB, et al. NF-M is an essential target for the myelin-directed “outside-in” signaling cascade that mediates radial axonal growth. J Cell Biol 2003; 163: 1011–20.
94. RaoMV, CampbellJ, YuanA, et al. The neurofilament middle molecular mass subunit carboxyl-terminal tail domains is essential for the radial growth and cytoskeletal architecture of axons but not for regulating neurofilament transport rate. J Cell Biol 2003; 163: 1021–31.
95. RaoMV, EngleLJ, MohanPS, et al. Myosin Va binding to neurofilaments is essential for correct myosin Va distribution and transport and neurofilament density. J Cell Biol 2002; 159: 279–90.
96. RaoMV, GarciaML, MiyazakiY, et al. Gene replacement in mice reveals that the heavily phosphorylated tail of neurofilament heavy subunit does not affect axonal caliber or the transit of cargoes in slow axonal transport. J Cell Biol 2002; 158: 681–93.
97. YinX, CrawfordTO, GriffinJW, et al. Myelin-associated glycoprotein is a myelin signal that modulates the caliber of myelinated axons. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 1953–62.
98. EdgarJM, McLaughlinM, YoolD, et al. Oligodendroglial modulation of fast axonal transport in a mouse model of hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Cell Biol 2004; 166: 121–31.
99. TrappBD, QuarlesRH. Presence of the myelin-associated glycoprotein correlates with alterations in the periodicity of peripheral myelin. J Cell Biol 1982; 92: 877–82.
100. TrappBD. Distribution of the myelin-associated glycoprotein and P0 protein during myelin compaction in quaking mouse peripheral nerve. J Cell Biol 1988; 107: 675–85.
101. TrappBD, AndrewsSB, WongA, et al. Co-localization of the myelin-associated glycoprotein and the microfilament components, F-actin and spectrin, in Schwann cells of myelinated nerve fibres. J Neurocytol 1989; 18: 47–60.
102. GendelmanHE, PezeshkpourGH, PressmanNJ, et al. A quantitation of myelin-associated glycoprotein and myelin basic protein loss in different demyelinating diseases. Ann Neurol 1985; 18: 324–8.
103. TrappBD, QuarlesRH, SuzukiK. Immunocytochemical studies of quaking mice support a role for the myelin-associated glycoprotein in forming and maintaining the periaxonal space and periaxonal cytoplasmic collar of myelinating Schwann cells. J Cell Biol 1984; 99: 594–606.
104. OwensGC, BungeRP. Schwann cells infected with a recombinant retrovirus expressing myelin-associated glycoprotein antisense RNA do not form myelin. Neuron 1991; 7: 565–75.
105. DashiellSM, TannerSL, PantHC, et al. Myelin-associated glycoprotein modulates expression and phosphorylation of neuronal cytoskeletal elements and their associated kinases. J Neurochem 2002; 81: 1263–72.
106. GuyJ, EllisEA, TarkEF III, et al. Axonal transport reductions in acute experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: qualitative analysis of the optic nerve. Curr Eye Res 1989; 8: 261–9.
107. KirkpatrickLL, WittAS, PayneHR, et al. Changes in microtubule stability and density in myelin-deficient shiverer mouse CNS axons. J Neurosci 1989; 21: 2288–97.
108. Munoz-MartinezEJ, Cuellar-PedrozaLH, Rubio-FranchiniC, et al. Depression of fast axonal transport in axons demyelinated by intraneural injection of a neurotoxin from K. humboldtiana. Neurochem Res 1994; 19: 1341–8.
109. RaoNA, GuyJ, SheffieldPS. Effects of chronic demyelination on axonal transport in experimental allergic optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 606–611.
110. ZhuB, MooreGR, ZwimpferTJ, et al. Axonal cytoskeleton changes in experimental optic neuritis. Brain Res 1999; 824: 204–17.
111. ArmstrongR, ToewsAD, MorellP. Rapid axonal transport in focally demyelinated sciatic nerve. J Neurosci 1987; 7: 4044–53.

References

1. LoisC, Alvarez-BuyllaA. Proliferating subventricular zone cells in the adult mammalian forebrain can differentiate into neurons and glia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 2074–7.
2. PalmerTD, RayJ, GageFH. FGF-2-responsive neuronal progenitors reside in proliferative and quiescent regions of the adult rodent brain. Mol Cell Neurosci 1995; 6: 474–86.
3. ReynoldsBA, TetzlaffW, WeissS. A multipotent EGF-responsive striatal embryonic progenitor cell produces neurons and astrocytes. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 4565–74.
4. AltmanJ. Autoradiographic and histological studies of postnatal neurogenesis. IV. Cell proliferation and migration in the anterior forebrain, with special reference to persisting neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 1969; 137: 433–57.
5. AltmanJ, DasGD. Autoradiographic and histologic evidence of postnatal neurogenesis in rats. J Comp Neurol 1965; 124: 319–35.
6. CameronHA, WoolleyCS, McEwenBS, et al. Differentiation of newly born neurons and glia in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat. Neuroscience 1993; 56: 337–44.
7. ErikssonPS, PerfilievaE, Björk-ErikssonT, et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med 1998; 4: 1313–17.
8. GageFH, RayJ, FisherLJ. Isolation, characterization, and use of stem cells from the CNS. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995; 18: 159–92.
9. McKayR. Stem cells in the central nervous system. Science 1997; 276: 66–71.
10. WeissS, ReynoldsBA, VescoviAL, et al. Is there a neural stem cell in the mammalian forebrain? Trends Neurosci 1996; 19: 387–93.
11. BonaguidiMA, WheelerMA, ShapiroJS, et al. In vivo clonal analysis reveals self-renewing and multipotent adult neural stem cell characteristics. Cell 2011; 145: 1142–55.
12. GreigLC, WoodworthMB, GalazoMJ, et al. Molecular logic of neocortical projection: neuron specification, development and diversity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013; 11: 755–69.
13. FameRM, MacDonaldJL, MacklisJD. Development, specification, and diversity of callosal projection neurons. Trends Neurosci 2011; 34: 41–50.
14. FrancoSJ, MüllerU. Shaping our minds: stem and progenitor cell diversity in the mammalian neocortex. Neuron 2013; 77: 19–34.
15. FrancoSJ, Gil-SanzC, Martinez-GarayI, et al. Fate-restricted neural progenitors in the mammalian cerebral cortex. Science 2012; 337: 746–9.
16. WoodworthMB, Custo GreigL, KriegsteinAR, et al. Snapshot: cortical development. Cell 2012; 151: 918.
17. SeabergRM, van der KooyD. Stem and progenitor cells: the premature desertion of rigorous definitions. Trends Neurosci 2003; 26: 125–31.
18. Alvarez-BuyllaA, Garcia-VerdugoJM, TramontinAD. A unified hypothesis on the lineage of neural stem cells. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 287–93.
19. Lopez-GarciaC, MolownyA, Martinez-GuijarroFJ, et al. Lesion and regeneration in the medial cerebral cortex of lizards. Histol Histopathol 1992; 7: 725–46.
20. BrockesJP. Amphibian limb regeneration: rebuilding a complex structure. Science 1997; 276: 81–7.
21. HitchcockPF, Lindsey MyhrKJ, EasterSS Jr, et al. Local regeneration in the retina of the goldfish. J Neurobiol 1992; 23: 187–203.
22. JohnsPR, EasterSS Jr. Growth of the adult goldfish eye. II. Increase in retinal cell number. J Comp Neurol 1977; 176: 331–41.
23. RakicP. Neurogenesis in adult primate neocortex: an evaluation of the evidence. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 65–71.
24. FischerAJ, RehTA. Muller glia are a potential source of neural regeneration in the postnatal chicken retina. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4: 247–52.
25. Alvarez-BuyllaA, Garcia-VerdugoJM, MateoAS, et al. Primary neural precursors and intermitotic nuclear migration in the ventricular zone of adult canraries. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 1020–37.
26. GoldmanSA, NottebohmF. Neuronal production, migration and differentiation in a vocal control nucleus of the adult female canary brain. Proc Acad Sci U S A 1983; 80: 2390–4.
27. NottebohmF. Neuronal replacement in adulthood. Ann NY Acad Sci 1985; 457: 143–61.
28. NottebohmF, ArnoldAP. Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of the songbird brain. Science 1976; 194: 211–13.
29. SimpsonHB, VicarioDS. Brain pathways for learned and unlearned vocalizations differ in zebra finches. J Neurosci 1990; 10: 1541–56.
30. ScharffC, KirnJR, GrossmanM, et al. Targeted neuronal death affects neuronal replacement and vocal behavior in adult songbirds. Neuron 2000; 25: 481–92.
31. AngevineJB, SidmanRL. Autoradiographic study of cell migration during histogenesis of cerebral cortex in the mouse. Nature 1961; 192: 766–8.
32. KaplanMS, HindsJW. Neurogenesis in the adult rat: electron microscopic analysis of light radioautographs. Science 1977; 197: 1092–4.
33. ReynoldsBA, WeissS. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 1992; 255: 1707–10.
34. RichardsLJ, KilpatrickTJ, BartlettPF. De novo generation of neuronal cells from the adult mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 8591–5.
35. DoetschF, CailleI, LimDA, et al. Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain. Cell 1999; 97: 703–16.
36. GoldmanSA. Neuronal precursor cells and neurogenesis in the adult forebrain. Neuroscientist 1995; 1: 338–50.
37. LuskinMB. Restricted proliferation and migration of postnatally generated neurons derived from the forebrain subventricular zone. Neuron 1993; 11: 173–89.
38. BernierPJ, BedardA, VinetJ, et al. Newly generated neurons in the amygdala and adjoining cortex of adult primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 11464–9.
39. RietzeR, PoulinP, WeissS. Mitotically active cells that generate neurons and astrocytes are present in multiple regions of the adult mouse hippocampus. J Comp Neurol 2000; 424: 397–408.
40. ZhaoM, MommaS, DelfanK, et al. Evidence for neurogenesis in the adult mammalian substantia nigra. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 7925–30.
41. FrielingsdorfH, SchwarzK, BrundinP, et al. No evidence for new dopaminergic neurons in the adult mammalian substantia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 10177–82.
42. LieDC, DziewczapolskiG, WillhoiteAR, et al. The adult substantia nigra contains progenitor cells with neurogenic potential. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 6639–49.
43. GouldE, ReevesAJ, GrazianoMS, et al. Neurogenesis in the neocortex of adult primates. Science 1999; 286: 548–52.
44. GouldE, VailN, WagersM, et al. Adult-generated hippocampal and neocortical neurons in macaques have a transient existence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 10910–17.
45. ChenJ, MagaviSS, MacklisJD. Neurogenesis of corticospinal motor neurons extending spinal projections in adult mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 16357–62.
46. EhningerD, KempermannG. Regional effects of wheel running and environmental enrichment on cell genesis and microglia proliferation in the adult murine neocortex. Cereb Cortex 2003; 13: 845–51.
47. KoketsuD, MikamiA, MiyamotoY, et al. Nonrenewal of neurons in the cerebral neocortex of adult macaque monkeys. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 937–42.
48. KornackDR, RakicP. Cell proliferation without neurogenesis in adult primate neocortex. Science 2001; 294: 2127–30.
49. MagaviS, LeavittB, MacklisJ. Induction of neurogenesis in the neocortex of adult mice. Nature 2000; 405: 951–5.
50. OhiraK, FurutaT, HiokiH, et al. Ischemia-induced neurogenesis of neocortical layer 1 progenitor cells. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13: 173–9.
51. GageFH, CoatesPW, PalmerTD, et al. Survival and differentiation of adult neuronal progenitor cells transplanted to the adult brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92: 11879–83.
52. ShihabuddinLS, HornerPJ, RayJ, et al. Adult spinal cord stem cells generate neurons after transplantation in the adult dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 8727–35.
53. SuhonenJO, PetersonDA, RayJ, et al. Differentiation of adult hippocampus-derived progenitors into olfactory neurons in vivo. Nature 1996; 383: 624–7.
54. TakahashiM, PalmerTD, TakahashiJ, et al. Widespread integration and survival of adult-derived neural progenitor cells in the developing optic retina. Mol Cell Neurosci 1998; 12: 340–8.
55. ShihabuddinLS, RayJ, GageFH. FGF-2 is sufficient to isolate progenitors found in the adult mammalian spinal cord. Exp Neurol 1997; 148: 577–86.
56. HornerPJ, PowerAE, KempermannG, et al. Proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells throughout the intact adult rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 2218–28.
57. HerzogC, OttoT. Regeneration of olfactory receptor neurons following chemical lesion: time course and enhancement with growth factor administration. Brain Res 1999; 849: 155–61.
58. MagaviSS, MitchellBD, SzentirmaiO, et al. Adult-born and preexisting olfactory granule neurons undergo distinct experience-dependent modifications of their olfactory responses in vivo. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 10729–39.
59. NakatomiH, KuriuT, OkabeS, et al. Regeneration of hippocampal pyramidal neurons after ischemic brain injury by recruitment of endogenous neural progenitors. Cell 2002; 110: 429–41.
60. ArvidssonA, CollinT, KirikD, et al. Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nat Med 2002; 8: 963–70.
61. ParentJM, VexlerZS, GongC, et al. Rat forebrain neurogenesis and striatal neuron replacement after focal stroke. Ann Neurol 2002; 52: 802–13.
62. KornackDR, RakicP. Continuation of neurogenesis in the hippocampus of the macaque monkey. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 5768–73.
63. PenceaV, BingamanKD, WiegandSJ, et al. Infusion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor into the lateral ventricle of the adult rat leads to new neurons in the parenchyma of the striatum, septum, thalamus, and hypothalamus. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 6706–17.
64. KirschenbaumB, NedergaardM, PreussA, et al. In vitro neuronal production and differentiation by precursor cells derived from the adult human forebrain. Cereb Cortex 1994; 6: 576–89.
65. PincusDW, KeyoungHM, Harrison-RestelliC, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-2/brain-derived neurotrophic factor-associated maturation of new neurons generated from adult human subependymal cells. Ann Neurol 1998; 43: 576–85.
66. SanaiN, TramontinAD, Quinones-HinojosaA, et al. Unique astrocyte ribbon in adult human brain contains neural stem cells but lacks chain migration. Nature 2004; 427: 740–4.
67. LoisC, Alvarez-BuyllaA. Long-distance neuronal migration in the adult mammalian brain. Science 1994; 264: 1145–8.
68. DoetschF, Alvarez-BuyllaA. Network of tangential pathways for neuronal migration in adult mammalian brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 14895–900.
69. LuskinMB, BooneMS. Rate and pattern of migration of lineally-related olfactory bulb interneurons generated postnatally in the subventricular zone of the rat. Chem Senses 1994; 19: 695–714.
70. ChiassonBJ, TropepeV, MorsheadCM, et al. Adult mammalian forebrain ependymal and subependymal cells demonstrate proliferative potential, but only subependymal cells have neural stem cell characteristics. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 4462–71.
71. JohanssonCB, MommaS, ClarkeDL, et al. Identification of a neural stem cell in the adult mammalian central nervous system. Cell 1999; 96: 25–34.
72. RousselotP, LoisC, Alvarez-BuyllaA. Embryonic (PSA) N-CAM reveals chains of migrating neuroblasts between the lateral ventricle and the olfactory bulb of adult mice. J Comp Neurol 1994; 35: 51–61.
73. SanaiN, NguyenT, IhrieRA, et al. Corridors of migrating neurons in the human brain and their decline during infancy. Nature 2011; 478: 382–6.
74. WinnerB, Cooper-KuhnCM, AignerR, et al. Long-term survival and cell death of newly generated neurons in the adult rat olfactory bulb. Eur J Neurosci 2002; 16: 1681–9.
75. BrillMS, NinkovicJ, WinpennyE, et al. Adult generation of glutamatergic olfactory bulb interneurons. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 1524–33.
76. OppenheimRW. Cell death during development of the nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci 1991; 14: 453–501.
77. BieblM, CooperCM, WinklerJ, et al. Analysis of neurogenesis and programmed cell death reveals a self-renewing capacity in the adult rat brain. Neurosci Lett 2000; 291: 17–20.
78. PortavellaM, VargasJP, TorresB, et al. The effects of telencephalic pallial lesions on spatial, temporal, and emotional learning in goldfish. Brain Res Bull 2002; 57: 397–9.
79. PetreanuL, Alvarez-BuyllaA. Maturation and death of adult-born olfactory bulb granule neurons: role of olfaction. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 6106–13.
80. CurtisMA, KamM, NannmarkU, et al. Human neuroblasts migrate to the olfactory bulb via a lateral ventricular extension. Science 2007: 315: 1243–9.
81. BergmannO, LieblJ, BernardS, et al. The age of olfactory bulb neurons in humans. Neuron 2012; 74: 634–9.
82. MacklisJD. Human adult olfactory bulb neurogenesis? Novelty is the best policy. Neuron 2012; 74: 595–6.
83. GrittiA, CovaL, ParatiEA, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor supports the proliferation of epidermal growth factor-generated neuronal precursor cells of the adult mouse CNS. Neurosci Lett 1995; 185: 151–4.
84. GrittiA, ParatiEA, CovaL, et al. Multipotential stem cells from the adult mouse brain proliferate and self-renew in response to basic fibroblast growth factor. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 1091–100.
85. GrittiA, Frolichsthal-SchoellerP, GalliR, et al. Epidermal and fibroblast growth factors behave as mitogenic regulators for a single multipotent stem cell-like population from the subventricular region of the adult mouse forebrain. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 3287–97.
86. HeinsN, MalatestaP, CecconiF, et al. Glial cells generate neurons: the role of the transcription factor Pax6. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 308–15.
87. MalatestaP, HartfussE, GotzM. Isolation of radial glial cells by fluorescent-activated cell sorting reveals a neuronal lineage. Development 2000; 127: 5253–63.
88. WhittemoreSR, MorassuttiDJ, WaltersWM, et al. Mitogen and substrate differentially affect the lineage restriction of adult rat subventricular zone neural precursor cell populations. Exp Cell Res 1999; 252: 75–95.
89. GrossRE, MehlerMF, MabiePC, et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins promote astroglial lineage commitment by mammalian subventricular zone progenitor cells. Neuron 1996; 17: 595–606.
90. WilliamsBP, ParkJK, AlbertaJA, et al. A PDGF-regulated immediate early gene response initiates neuronal differentiation in ventricular zone progenitor cells. Neuron 1997; 18: 553–62.
91. ArsenijevicY, WeissS. Insulin-like growth factor-I is a differentiation factor for postmitotic stem cell-derived neuronal precursors: distinct actions form those of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 2118–28.
92. KirschenbaumB, GoldmanSA. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes the survival of neurons arising from the adult rat forebrain subependymal zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92: 210–14.
93. AhmedS, ReynoldsBA, WeissS. BDNF enhances the differentiation but not the survival of CNS stem cell-derived neuronal precursors. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 5765–78.
94. CraigCG, TropepeV, MorsheadCM, et al. In vivo growth factor expansion of endogenous subependymal neural precursor cell populations in the adult mouse brain. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 2649–58.
95. KuhnHG, WinklerJ, KempermannG, et al. Epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-2 have different effects on neural progenitors in the adult rat brain. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 5820–9.
96. TaoY, BlackIB, DiCicco-BloomE. Neurogenesis in neonatal rat brain is regulated by peripheral injection of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). J Comp Neurol 1996; 376: 653–63.
97. JinK, ZhuY, SunY, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 11946–50.
98. ZigovaT, PenceaV, WiegandSJ, et al. Intraventricular administration of BDNF increases the number of newly generated neurons in the adult olactory bulb. Mol Cell Neurosci 1998; 11: 234–45.
99. BenraissA, ChmielnickiE, LernerK, et al. Adenoviral brain-derived neurotrophic factor induces both neostriatal and olfactory neuronal recruitment from endogenous progenitor cells in the adult forebrain. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 6718–31.
100. KempermannG, WiskottL, GageFH. Functional significance of adult neurogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004; 14: 186–91.
101. GouldE, TanapatP, McEwenBS, et al. Proliferation of granule cell precursors in the dentate gyrus of adult monkeys is diminished by stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 3168–71.
102. GouldE, ReevesAJ, FallahM, et al. Hippocampal neurogenesis in adult old world primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 5263–7.
103. HastingsNB, GouldE. Rapid extension of axons into the CA3 region by adult-generated granule cells. J Comp Neurol 1999; 413: 146–54.
104. MarkakisE, GageFH. Adult-generated neurons in the dentate gyrus send axonal projections to the field CA3 and are surrounded by synaptic vesicles. J Comp Neurol 1999; 406: 449–60.
105. StanfieldBB, TriceJE. Evidence that granule cells generated in the dentate gyrus of adult rats extend axonal projections. Exp Brain Res 1988; 72: 399–406.
106. PalmerTD, WillhoiteAR, GageFH. Vascular niche for adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol 2000; 425: 479–94.
107. KempermannG, JessbergerS, SteinerB, et al. Milestones of neuronal development in the adult hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 2004; 27: 477–52.
108. SeabergRM, van der KooyD. Adult rodent neurogenic regions: the ventricular subependyma contains neural stem cells, but the dentate gyrus contains restricted progenitors. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 1784–93.
109. SeriB, Garcia-VerdugoJM, McEwenBS, et al. Astrocytes give rise to new neurons in the adult mammalian hippocampus. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 7153–60.
110. FilippovV, KronenbergG, PivnevaT, et al. Subpopulation of nestin-expressing progenitor cells in the adult murine hippocampus shows electrophysiological and morphological characteristics of astrocytes. Mol Cell Neurosci 2003; 23: 373–82.
111. FukudaS, KatoF, TozukaY, et al. Two distinct subpopulations of nestin-positive cells in adult mouse dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 9357–66.
112. LugertS, BasakO, KnucklesP, et al. Quiescent and active hippocampal neural stem cells with distinct morphologies respond selectively to physiological and pathological stimuli and aging. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 6: 445–56.
113. EncinasJM, MichurinaTV, PeunovaN, et al. Division-coupled astrocytic differentiation and age-related depletion of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 2011; 8: 566–79.
114. HodgeRD, KowalczykTD, WolfSA, et al. Intermediate progenitors in adult hippocampal neurogenesis: Tbr2 expression and coordinate regulation of neuronal output. J Neurosci 2008; 2: 3707–17.
115. KronenbergG, ReuterK, SteinerB, et al. Subpopulations of proliferating cells of the adult hippocampus respond differently to physiologic neurogenic stimuli. J Comp Neurol 2003; 467: 455–63.
116. BrandtMD, JessbergerS, SteinerB, et al. Transient calretinin-expression defines early postmitotic step of neuronal differentiation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis of mice. Mol Cell Neurosci 2003; 24: 603–13.
117. van PraagH, SchinderAF, ChristieBR, et al. Functional neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Nature 2002; 415: 1030–4.
118. GageFH. Stem cells of the central nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1998; 8: 671–6.
119. HermannA, MaiselM, LiebauS, et al. Mesodermal cell types induce neurogenesis from adult human hippocampal progenitor cells. J Neurochem 2006; 98: 629–40.
120. RoyNS, WangS, JiangL, et al. In vitro neurogenesis by progenitor cells isolated from the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med 2000; 6: 271–7.
121. KnothR, SingecI, DitterM, et al. Murine features of neurogenesis in the human hippocampus across the lifespan from 0 to 100 years. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e8809.
122. KuhnHG, Dickinson-AnsonH, GageFH. Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 2027–33.
123. CameronHA, McKayRD. Restoring production of hippocampal neurons in old age. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 894–7.
124. MontaronMF, PetryKG, RodriguezJJ, et al. Adrenalectomy increases neurogenesis but not PSA-NCAM expression in aged dentate gyrus. Eur J Neurosci 1999; 11: 1479–85.
125. FabelK, WolfSA, EhningerD, et al. Additive effects of physical exercise and environmental enrichment on adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice. Front Neurosci 2009; 3: 50.
126. BengzonJ, KokaiaZ, ElmérE, et al. Apoptosis and proliferation of dentate gyrus neurons after single and intermittent limbic seizures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94: 10432–7.
127. ParentJM, YuTW, LeibowitzRT, et al. Dentate granule cell neurogenesis is increased by seizures and contributes to aberrant network reorganization in the adult rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 3727–38.
128. HuangL, CilioMR, SilveiraDC, et al. Long-term effects of neonatal seizures: a behavioral, electrophysiological, and histological study. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1999; 118: 99–107.
129. ParentJM, LowensteinDH. Seizure-induced neurogenesis: are more new neurons good for an adult brain? Prog Brain Res 2002; 135: 121–31.
130. ParentJM, TadaE, FikeJR, et al. Inhibition of dentate granule cell neurogenesis with brain irradation does not prevent seizure-induced mossy fiber synaptic reorganization in the rat. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 4508–19.
131. RepresaA, NiquetJ, PollardH, et al. Cell death, gliosis, and synaptic remodeling in the hippocampus of epileptic rats. J Neurobiol 1995; 26: 413–25.
132. KempermannG, KuhnHG, GageFH. More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature 1997; 386: 493–5.
133. van PraagH, KempermannG, GageFH. Running increases cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult mouse dentate gyrus. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 266–70.
134. GouldE, BeylinA, TanapatP, et al. Learning enhances adult neurogenesis in the hippoampal formation. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 260–5.
135. TanapatP, GaleaLA, GouldE. Stress inhibits the proliferation of granule cell precursors in the developing dentate gyrus. Int J Dev Neurosci 1998; 16: 235–9.
136. KempermannG, GastD, KronenbergG, et al. Early determination and long-term persistence of adult-generated new neurons in the hippocampus of mice. Development 2003; 130: 391–9.
137. AbergMA, AbergND, HedbackerH, et al. Peripheral infusion of IGF-I selectively induces neurogenesis in the adult rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 2896–903.
138. CarroE, NunezA, BusiguinaS, et al. Circulating insulin-like growth factor I mediates effects of exercise on the brain. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 2926–33.
139. TrejoJL, CarroE, Torres-AlemanI. Circulating insulin-like growth factor I mediates exercise-induced increases in the number of new neurons in the adult hippocampus. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 1628–34.
140. GouldE, CameronHA, DanielsDC, et al. Adrenal hormones suppress cell division in the adult rat dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 3642–50.
141. CameronHA, GouldE. Adult neurogenesis is regulated by adrenal steroids in the dentate gyrus. Neuroscience 1994; 61: 203–9.
142. BrezunJM, DaszutaA. Depletion in serotonin decreases neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus and the subventricular zone of adult rats. Neuroscience 1999; 89: 999–1002.
143. BrezunJM, DaszutaA. Serotonin may stimulate granule cell proliferation in the adult hippocampus, as observed in rats grafted with foetal raphe neurons. Eur J Neurosci 2000; 12: 391–6.
144. MalbergJE, EischAJ, NestlerEJ, et al. Chronic antidepressant treatment increases neurogenesis in adult rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 9104–10.
145. ImayoshiI, SakamotoM, OhtsukaT, et al. Roles of continuous neurogenesis in the structural and functional integrity of the adult forebrain. Nat Neurosci 2008; 11: 1153–61.
146. AimoneJB, DengW, GageFH. Adult neurogenesis: integrating theories and separating functions. Trends Cogn Sci 2010; 14: 325–37.
147. GartheA, BehrJ, KempermannG. Adult-generated hippocampal neurons allow the flexible use of spatially precise learning strategies. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e5464.
148. KaplanMS. Neurogenesis in the 3-month-old rat visual cortex. J Comp Neurol 1981; 195: 323–38.
149. TropepeV, ColesBL, ChiassonBJ, et al. Retinal stem cells in the adult mammalian eye. Science 2000; 287: 2032–6.
150. WeissS, DunneC, HewsonJ, et al. Multipotent CNS stem cells are present in the adult mammalian spinal cord and ventricular neuroaxis. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 7599–609.
151. SongH, StevensCF, GageFH. Astroglia induce neurogenesis from adult neural stem cells. Nature 2002; 417: 39–44.
152. EmsleyJG, MacklisJD. Astroglial heterogeneity closely reflects the neuronal-defined anatomy of the adult murine CNS. Neuron Glia Biol 2006; 2: 175–86.
153. BreunigJJ, ArellanoJI, MacklisJD, et al. Everything that glitters isn’t gold: a critical review of postnatal neural precursor analyses. Cell Stem Cell 2007; 1: 612–27.
154. D’AmourKA, GageFH. Genetic and functional differences between multipotent neural and pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 11866–72.
155. LendahlU, ZimmermanLB, McKayRDG. CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein. Cell 1990; 60: 585–95.
156. RousselotP, HeintzN, NottebohmF. Expression of brain lipid binding protein in the brain of the adult canary and its implications for adult neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol 1997; 385: 415–26.
157. Alvarez-DoladoM, PardalR, Garcia-VerdugoJM, et al. Fusion of bone-marrow-derived cells with Purkinje neurons, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Nature 2003; 425: 968–73.
158. Cooper-KuhnCM, KuhnHG. Is it all DNA repair? Methodological considerations for detecting neurogenesis in the adult brain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 2002; 134: 13–21.
159. YangY, GeldmacherDS, HerrupK. DNA replication precedes neuronal cell death in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 2661–8.
160. YangY, MufsonEJ, HerrupK. Neuronal cell death is preceded by cell cycle events at all stages of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 2557–63.
161. CarletonA, PetreanuLT, LansfordR, et al. Becoming a new neuron in the adult olfactory bulb. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 507–18.
162. MagaviSS, MacklisJD. Identification of newborn cells by BrdU labeling and immunocytochemistry in vivo. Method Mol Biol 2002; 198: 283–90.
163. MagaviSS, MacklisJD. Immunocytochemical analysis of neuronal differentiation. Method Mol Biol 2002; 198: 291–7.
164. YamaguchiM, SaitoH, SuzukiM, et al. Visualization of neurogenesis in the central nervous system using nestin promoter-GFP transgenic mice. NeuroReport 2000; 11: 1991–6.
165. SongHJ, StevensCF, GageFH. Neural stem cells from adult hippocampus develop essential properties of functional CNS neurons. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 438–45.
166. CatapanoLA, MagaviSS, MacklisJD. Neuroanatomical tracing of neuronal projections with fluoro-gold. Methods Mol Biol 2002; 198: 299–304.
167. WangY, SheenVL, MacklisJD. Cortical interneurons up-regulate neurotrophins in vivo in response to targeted apoptotic degeneration of neighboring pyramidal neurons. Exp Neurol 1998; 154: 389–402.
168. Fricker-GatesRA, ShinJJ, TaiCC, et al. Late-stage immature neocortical neurons reconstruct interhemispheric connections and form synaptic contacts with increased efficiency in adult mouse cortex undergoing targeted neurodegeneration. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 4045–56.
169. KronenbergG, WangLP, GeraertsM, et al. Local origin and activity-dependent generation of nestin-expressing protoplasmic astrocytes in CA1. Brain Struct Funct 2007; 212: 19–35.
170. KokoevaMV, YinH, FlierJS. Neurogenesis in the hypothalamus of adult mice: potential role in energy balance. Science 2005; 310: 679–83.
171. HandlerM, YangX, ShenJ. Presenilin-1 regulates neuronal differentiation during neurogenesis. Development 2000; 127: 2593–606.
172. FengR, RamponC, TangYP, et al. Deficient neurogenesis in forebrain-specific presenilin-1 knockout mice is associated with reduced clearance of hippocampal memory traces. Neuron 2002; 32: 911–26. Erratum in Neuron 2002; 33: 313.
173. D’SaC, DumanRS. Antidepressants and neuroplasticity. Bipolar Disord 2002; 4: 183–94.
174. JacobsBL, PraagH, GageFH. Adult brain neurogenesis and psychiatry: a novel theory of depression. Mol Psychiatry 2000; 5: 262–9.
175. KempermannG, KronenbergG. Depressed new neurons? Adult hippocampal neurogenesis and a cellular plasticity hypothesis of major depression. Biol Psychiatr 2003; 54: 499–503.
176. SahayA, HenR. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis in depression. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 1110–15.
177. ShelineYI, WangPW, GadoMH, et al. Hippocampal atrophy in recurrent major depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 3908–13.
178. SantarelliL, SaxeM, GrossC, et al. Requirement of hippocampal neurogenesis for the behavioral effects of antidepressants. Science 2003; 301: 805–9.
179. MonjeML, MizumatsuS, FikeJR, et al. Irradiation induces neural precursor-cell dysfunction. Nat Med 2002; 8: 955–62.
180. HolickKA, LeeDC, HenR, et al. Behavioral effects of chronic fluoxetine in BALB/cJ mice do not require adult hippocampal neurogenesis or the serotonin 1A receptor. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33: 406–17.
181. ArlottaP, MolyneauxBJ, ChenJ, et al. Neuronal subtype specific genes that control corticospinal motor neuron development in vivo. Neuron 2005; 45: 207–21.
182. MolyneauxBJ, ArlottaP, HirataT, et al. Fezl is required for the birth and specification of corticospinal motor neurons. Neuron 2005; 47: 817–31.

Reference

1. CajalSR. La rétine des vertèbres. Cellule 1892; 9: 119–258.
2. WeissP. In vitro experiments on the factors determining the course of the outgrowing nerve fiber. J Exp Zoo 1934; 68: 393–448.
3. HarrisonR. The reaction of embryonic cells to solid structures. J Exp Zoo 1914; 17: 521–44.
4. WeissP. Self-differentiation of the basic patterns of coordination. Comp Psych Mono 1941; 17: 1–96.
5. SperryRW. Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and connections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1963; 50: 703–10.
6. CajalSR. À quelle époque apparaissent les expansions des cellules nerveuses de la moëlle épinière du poulet? Anat Anz 1890; 21–22: 609–39.
7. HarrisonR. Observations on the living developing nerve fiber. Anat Rec 1907; 1: 116–18.
8. SpeidelC. Studies of living nerves II. Activities of amoeboid growth cones, sheath cells and myelin segments, as revealed by prolonged observation of individual fibers in frog tadpoles. Am J Anat 1933; 52: 1–79.
9. SheetzM, BaumrindNL, WayneDB, et al. Concentration of membrane antigens by forward transport and trapping in neuronal growth cones. Cell 1990; 61: 231–41.
10. O’ConnorT, DuerrJS, BentleyD. Pioneer growth cone steering decisions mediated by single filopodial contacts in situ. J Neurosci 1990; 10: 3935–46.
11. ForscherP, SmithSJ. Actions of cytochalasins on the organization of actin filaments and microtubules in a neuronal growth cone. J Cell Biol 1988; 107: 1505–16.
12. BrownJ, BridgmanPC. Role of myosin II in axon outgrowth. J Histochem Cytochem 2003; 51: 421–8.
13. MallavarapuA, MitchisonTJ. Regulated actin cytoskeleton assembly at filopodium tips controls their extension and retraction. J Cell Biol 1999; 146: 1097–106.
14. LamoureuxP, BuxbaumRE, HeidemannSR. Direct evidence that growth cones pull. Nature 1989; 340: 159–62.
15. MooreSW, BiaisN, SheetzMP. Traction on immobilized netrin-1 is sufficient to reorient axons. Science 2009; 325: 166.
16. SuterDM, ForscherP. An emerging link between cytoskeletal dynamics and cell adhesion molecules in growth cone guidance. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1998; 8: 106–16.
17. Tessier-LavigneM, GoodmanC. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 1996; 274: 1123–33.
18. ButlerSJ, DoddJ. A role for BMP heterodimers in roof plate-mediated repulsion of commissural axons. Neuron 2003; 38: 389–401.
19. AugsburgerA, SchuchardtA, HoskinsS, et al. BMPs as mediators of roof plate repulsion of commissural neurons. Neuron 1999; 24: 127–41.
20. Ruiz de AlmodovarC, FabrePJ, KnevelsE, et al. VEGF mediates commissural axon chemoattraction through its receptor Flk1. Neuron 2011; 70: 966–78.
21. CharronF, SteinE, JeongJ, et al. The morphogen sonic hedgehog is an axonal chemoattractant that collaborates with netrin-1 in midline axon guidance. Cell 2003; 113: 11–23.
22. SerafiniT, ColamarinoSA, LeonardoED, et al. Netrin-1 is required for commissural axon guidance in the developing vertebrate nervous system. Cell 1996; 87: 1001–14.
23. KennedyT, SerafiniT, la Torre deJR, et al. Netrins are diffusible chemotropic factors for commissural axons in the embryonic spinal cord. Cell 1994; 78: 425–35.
24. StoeckliET, SondereggerP, PollerbergGE, et al. Interference with axonin-1 and NrCAM interactions unmasks a floor-plate activity inhibitory for commissural axons. Neuron 1997; 18: 209–21.
25. BourikasD, PekarikV, BaeriswylT, et al. Sonic hedgehog guides commissural axons along the longitudinal axis of the spinal cord. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 297–304.
26. LyuksyutovaAI, LuC-C, MilanesioN, et al. Anterior-posterior guidance of commissural axons by Wnt-frizzled signaling. Science 2003; 302: 1984–8.
27. LongH, SabatierC, MaL, et al. Conserved roles for Slit and Robo proteins in midline commissural axon guidance. Neuron 2004; 42: 213–23.
28. ZouY, StoeckliET, ChenH, et al. Squeezing axons out of the gray matter: a role for slit and semaphorin proteins from midline and ventral spinal cord. Cell 2000; 102: 363–75.
29. ReichardtLF, TomaselliKJ. Extracellular matrix molecules and their receptors: functions in neural development. Ann Rev Neurosci 1991; 14: 531–70.
30. BarrosCS, FrancoSJ, MüllerU. Extracellular matrix: functions in the nervous system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2011; 3: a005108.
31. AumailleyM, Bruckner-TudermanL, CarterWG, et al. A simplified laminin nomenclature. Matrix Biol 2005; 24: 326–32.
32. ColognatoH, YurchencoPD. Form and function: the laminin family of heterotrimers. Dev Dyn 2000; 218: 213–34.
33. IdeC, TohyamaK, YokotaR, et al. Schwann cell basal lamina and nerve regeneration. Brain Res 1983; 288: 61–75.
34. DavidS, BraunPE, JacksonDL, et al. Laminin overrides the inhibitory effects of peripheral nervous system and central nervous system myelin-derived inhibitors of neurite growth. J Neurosci Res 1995; 42: 594–602.
35. LentzSI, MinerJH, SanesJR, et al. Distribution of the ten known laminin chains in the pathways and targets of developing sensory axons. J Comp Neurol 1997; 378: 547–61.
36. HuangC-C, HallDH, HedgecockEM, et al. Laminin alpha subunits and their role in C. elegans development. Development 2003; 130: 3343–58.
37. MartinD, ZusmanS, LiX, et al. Wing blister, a new Drosophila laminin alpha chain required for cell adhesion and migration during embryonic and imaginal development. J Cell Biol 1999; 145: 191–201.
38. SmythN, VatanseverHS, MeyerM, et al. The targeted deletion of the LAMC1 gene. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 857: 283–6.
39. AdamsD, KaoE, HypoliteC, et al. Growth cones turn and migrate up an immobilized gradient of the laminin IKVAV peptide. J Neurobiol 2005; 62: 134–47.
40. DertingerSKW, JiangX, LiZ, et al. Gradients of substrate-bound laminin orient axonal specification of neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 12542–7.
41. MatsuzawaM, TokumitsuS, KnollW, et al. Molecular gradient along the axon pathway is not required for directional axon growth. J Neurosci Res 1998; 53: 114–24.
42. McKennaM. Growth cone behavior on gradients of substratum bound laminin*1. Dev Biol 1988; 130: 232–6.
43. HalfterW, DongS, YipY-P, et al. A critical function of the pial basement membrane in cortical histogenesis. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 6029–40.
44. ChenZ-L, HaegeliV, YuH, et al. Cortical deficiency of laminin gamma1 impairs the AKT/GSK-3beta signaling pathway and leads to defects in neurite outgrowth and neuronal migration. Dev Biol 2009; 327: 158–68.
45. TakadaY, YeX, SimonS. The integrins. Genome Biol 2007; 8: 215.
46. BelkinAM, Stepp MA. Integrins as receptors for laminins. Microsc Res Tech 2000; 51: 280–301.
47. KimS, BuretteA, ChungH, et al. NGL family PSD-95-interacting adhesion molecules regulate excitatory synapse formation. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 1294–301.
48. KapplerJ, FrankenS, JunghansU, et al. Glycosaminoglycan-binding properties and secondary structure of the C-terminus of netrin-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 271: 287–91.
49. ManittC, ColicosMA, ThompsonKM, et al. Widespread expression of netrin-1 by neurons and oligodendrocytes in the adult mammalian spinal cord. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 3911–22.
50. SerafiniT, KennedyT, GalkoMJ, et al. The netrins define a family of axon outgrowth-promoting proteins homologous to C. elegans UNC-6. Cell 1994; 78: 409–24.
51. PlaczekM, Tessier-LavigneM, JessellT, et al. Orientation of commissural axons in vitro in response to a floor plate-derived chemoattractant. Development 1990; 110: 19–30.
52. Tessier-LavigneM, PlaczekM, LumsdenAG, et al. Chemotropic guidance of developing axons in the mammalian central nervous system. Nature 1988; 336: 775–8.
53. WeberA. Croissance des fibres nerveuses commissurales lors de lésions de la moelle épinière chez de jeunes embryons de poulet. Biomorphosis 1934; 1: 30–5.
54. CajalSR. Textura del sistema nervioso del hombre y de los vertebrados estudios sobre el plan estructural y composición histológica de los centros nerviosos adicionados de consideraciones fisiológicas fundadas en los nuevos descubrimientos. Madrid: Imprenta y Librería de Nicolás Moya, 1899.
55. HedgecockE, CulottiJ, HallDH. The unc-5, unc-6, and unc-40 genes guide circumferential migrations of pioneer axons and mesodermal cells on the epidermis in C. elegans. Neuron 1990; 4: 61–85.
56. ChanSS, ZhengH, SuMW, et al. UNC-40, a C. elegans homolog of DCC (Deleted in Colorectal Cancer), is required in motile cells responding to UNC-6 netrin cues. Cell 1996; 87: 187–95.
57. Leung-HagesteijnC, SpenceA, SternB, et al. UNC-5, a transmembrane protein with immunoglobulin and thrombospondin type 1 domains, guides cell and pioneer axon migrations in C. elegans. Cell 1992; 71: 289–99.
58. FazeliA, DickinsonSL, HermistonML, et al. Phenotype of mice lacking functional Deleted in colorectal cancer (Dcc) gene. Nature 1997; 386: 796–804.
59. Keino-MasuK, MasuM, HinckL, et al. Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) encodes a netrin receptor. Cell 1996; 87: 175–85.
60. EngelkampD. Cloning of three mouse Unc5 genes and their expression patterns at mid-gestation. Mech Dev 2002; 118: 191–7.
61. AckermanS, KozakLP, PrzyborskiS, et al. The mouse rostral cerebellar malformation gene encodes an UNC-5-like protein. Nature 1997; 386: 838–42.
62. LeonardoED, HinckL, MasuM, et al. Vertebrate homologues of C. elegans UNC-5 are candidate netrin receptors. Nature 1997; 386: 833–8.
63. HongK, HinckL, NishiyamaM, et al. A ligand-gated association between cytoplasmic domains of UNC5 and DCC family receptors converts netrin-induced growth cone attraction to repulsion. Cell 1999; 97: 927–41.
64. AndrewsGL, TanglaoS, FarmerWT, et al. Dscam guides embryonic axons by Netrin-dependent and -independent functions. Development 2008; 135: 3839–48.
65. LyA, NikolaevA, SureshG, et al. DSCAM is a netrin receptor that collaborates with DCC in mediating turning responses to netrin-1. Cell 2008; 133: 1241–54.
66. YebraM, MontgomeryAMP, DiaferiaGR, et al. Recognition of the neural chemoattractant Netrin-1 by integrins alpha6beta4 and alpha3beta1 regulates epithelial cell adhesion and migration. Dev Cell 2003; 5: 695–707.
67. RothbergJ, HartleyD, WaltherZ, et al. Slit: an EGF-homologous locus of D. melanogaster involved in the development of the embryonic central nervous system. Cell 1988; 55: 1047–59.
68. Nusslein-VolhardC, WiechausE, KludingH. Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Zygotic loci on the second chromosome. Roux’s Arch Dev Biol 1984; 193: 267–83.
69. LiH, ChenJ, WuW, et al. Vertebrate slit, a secreted ligand for the transmembrane protein roundabout, is a repellent for olfactory bulb axons. Cell 1999; 96: 807–18.
70. KiddT, BlandK, GoodmanC. Slit is the midline repellent for the robo receptor in Drosophila. Cell 1999; 96: 785–94.
71. RothbergJ, JacobsJ, GoodmanC, et al. Slit: an extracellular protein necessary for development of midline glia and commissural axon pathways contains both EGF and LRR domains. Genes Dev 1990; 4: 2169–87.
72. RajagopalanS, VivancosV, NicolasE, et al. Selecting a longitudinal pathway: Robo receptors specify the lateral position of axons in the Drosophila CNS. Cell 2000; 103: 1033–45.
73. SimpsonJ, BlandK, FetterRD, et al. Short-range and long-range guidance by Slit and its Robo receptors: a combinatorial code of Robo receptors controls lateral position. Cell 2000; 103: 1019–32.
74. SeegerM, TearG, Ferres-MarcoD, et al. Mutations affecting growth cone guidance in Drosophila: genes necessary for guidance toward or away from the midline. Neuron 1993; 10: 409–26.
75. HolmesG, NegusK, BurridgeL, et al. Distinct but overlapping expression patterns of two vertebrate slit homologs implies functional roles in CNS development and organogenesis. Mech Dev 1998; 79: 57–72.
76. ItohA, MiyabayashiT, OhnoM, et al. Cloning and expressions of three mammalian homologues of Drosophila slit suggest possible roles for Slit in the formation and maintenance of the nervous system. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 1998; 62: 175–86.
77. BroseK, BlandKS, WangKH, et al. Slit proteins bind Robo receptors and have an evolutionarily conserved role in repulsive axon guidance. Cell 1999; 96: 795–806.
78. YuanS, CoxL, DasikaG, et al. Cloning and functional studies of a novel gene aberrantly expressed in RB-deficient embryos. Dev Biol 1999; 207: 62–75.
79. TaguchiA, WanakaA, MoriT, et al. Molecular cloning of novel leucine-rich repeat proteins and their expression in the developing mouse nervous system. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 1996; 35: 31–40.
80. FujisawaK, WranaJL, CulottiJ. The slit receptor EVA-1 coactivates a SAX-3/Robo mediated guidance signal in C. elegans. Science 2007; 317: 1934–8.
81. ErskineL, WilliamsS, BroseK, et al. Retinal ganglion cell axon guidance in the mouse optic chiasm: expression and function of robos and slits. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 4975–982.
82. WangKH, BroseK, ArnottD, et al. Biochemical purification of a mammalian slit protein as a positive regulator of sensory axon elongation and branching. Cell 1999; 96: 771–84.
83. Ba-CharvetKT N, BroseK, MarillatV, et al. Slit2-mediated chemorepulsion and collapse of developing forebrain axons. Neuron 1999; 22: 463–73.
84. LuoY, RaibleD, RaperJA. Collapsin: a protein in brain that induces the collapse and paralysis of neuronal growth cones. Cell 1993; 75: 217–27.
85. MessersmithEK, LeonardoED, ShatzCJ, et al. Semaphorin III can function as a selective chemorepellent to pattern sensory projections in the spinal cord. Neuron 1995; 14: 949–59.
86. TranTS, KolodkinAL, BharadwajR. Semaphorin regulation of cellular morphology. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 2007; 23: 263–92.
87. WongJ, WongS, O’ConnorT. Ectopic semaphorin-1a functions as an attractive guidance cue for developing peripheral neurons. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 798–803.
88. SongH, MingG, HeZ, et al. Conversion of neuronal growth cone responses from repulsion to attraction by cyclic nucleotides. Science 1998; 281: 1515–18.
89. WongJ, YuW, O’ConnorT. Transmembrane grasshopper Semaphorin I promotes axon outgrowth in vivo. Development 1997; 124: 3597–607.
90. DerijckAAHA, Van ErpS, PasterkampRJ. Semaphorin signaling: molecular switches at the midline. Trends Cell Biol 2010; 20: 568–76.
91. BecharaA, NawabiH, MoretF, et al. FAK-MAPK-dependent adhesion disassembly downstream of L1 contributes to semaphorin3A-induced collapse. EMBO J 2008; 27: 1549–62.
92. FalkJ, JulienF, BecharaA, et al. Dual functional activity of semaphorin 3B is required for positioning the anterior commissure. Neuron 2005; 48: 63–75.
93. ChauvetS, CohenS, YoshidaY, et al. Gating of Sema3E/PlexinD1 signaling by neuropilin-1 switches axonal repulsion to attraction during brain development. Neuron 2007; 56: 807–22.
94. BellonA, LuchinoJ, HaighK, et al. VEGFR2 (KDR/Flk1) signaling mediates axon growth in response to semaphorin 3E in the developing brain. Neuron 2010; 66: 205–19.
95. HimanenJ-P, NikolovDB. Eph receptors and ephrins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2003; 35: 130–4.
96. McLaughlinT, HindgesR, YatesP, et al. Bifunctional action of ephrin-B1 as a repellent and attractant to control bidirectional branch extension in dorsal-ventral retinotopic mapping. Neuron 2003; 130: 2407–18.
97. DrescherU, KremoserC, HandwerkerC, et al. In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 1995; 82: 359–70.
98. OrioliD, HenkemeyerM, LemkeG, et al. Sek4 and Nuk receptors cooperate in guidance of commissural axons and in palate formation. EMBO J 1996; 15: 6035–49.
99. YokoyamaN, RomeroM, CowanC, et al. Forward signaling mediated by ephrin-B3 prevents contralateral corticospinal axons from recrossing the spinal cord midline. Neuron 2001; 29: 85–97.
100. KullanderK, CrollS, ZimmerM, et al. Ephrin-B3 is the midline barrier that prevents corticospinal tract axons from recrossing, allowing for unilateral motor control. Genes Dev 2001; 15: 877–88.
101. CoonanJ, GreferathU, MessengerJ, et al. Development and reorganization of corticospinal projections in EphA4 deficient mice. J Comp Neurol 2001; 436: 248–62.
102. PitulescuME, AdamsRH. Eph/ephrin molecules–a hub for signaling and endocytosis. Genes Dev 2010; 24: 2480–92.
103. CommitteeE. Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands, the ephrins. Cell 1997; 90: 403–4.
104. WenS, LiH, LiuJ. Dynamic signaling for neural stem cell fate determination. Cell Adh Migr 2009; 3: 107–17.
105. YamauchiK, PhanKD, ButlerSJ. BMP type I receptor complexes have distinct activities mediating cell fate and axon guidance decisions. Development 2008; 135: 1119–28.
106. OkadaA, CharronF, MorinS, et al. Boc is a receptor for sonic hedgehog in the guidance of commissural axons. Nature 2006; 444: 369–73.
107. GundersenRW, BarrettJN. Neuronal chemotaxis: chick dorsal-root axons turn toward high concentrations of nerve growth factor. Science 1979; 206: 1079–80.
108. MingG-L, WongST, HenleyJ, et al. Adaptation in the chemotactic guidance of nerve growth cones. Nature 2002; 417: 411–18.
109. Cohen-CoryS, KidaneAH, ShirkeyNJ, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and the development of structural neuronal connectivity. Dev Neurobiol 2010; 70: 271–88.
110. HellardD, BrosenitschT, FritzschB, et al. Cranial sensory neuron development in the absence of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in BDNF/Bax double null mice. Dev Biol 2004; 275: 34–43.
111. MonnierPP, SierraA, MacchiP, et al. RGM is a repulsive guidance molecule for retinal axons. Nature 2002; 419: 392–5.
112. SeverynCJ, ShindeU, RotweinP. Molecular biology, genetics and biochemistry of the repulsive guidance molecule family. Biochem J 2009; 422: 393–403.
113. RajagopalanS, DeitinghoffL, DavisD, et al. Neogenin mediates the action of repulsive guidance molecule. Cell 2004; 6: 756–62.
114. BabittJL, ZhangY, SamadTA, et al. Repulsive guidance molecule (RGMa), a DRAGON homologue, is a bone morphogenetic protein co-receptor. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 29820–7.
115. XiaY, YuPB, SidisY, et al. Repulsive guidance molecule RGMa alters utilization of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type II receptors by BMP2 and BMP4. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 18129–40.
116. HolmesK, RobertsOL, ThomasAM, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2: structure, function, intracellular signalling and therapeutic inhibition. Cell Signal 2007; 19: 2003–12.
117. ErskineL, ReijntjesS, PrattT, et al. VEGF signaling through neuropilin 1 guides commissural axon crossing at the optic chiasm. J Neurosci 2011; 70: 951–65.
118. ChenH, ChédotalA, HeZ, et al. Neuropilin-2, a novel member of the neuropilin family, is a high affinity receptor for the semaphorins Sema E and Sema IV but not Sema III. Neuron 1997; 19: 547–59.
119. HallA. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 1998; 279: 509–14.
120. BishopAL, HallA. Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. Biochem J 2000; 348: 241–55.
121. GovekE-E, NeweySE, Van AelstL. The role of the Rho GTPases in neuronal development. Genes Dev 2005; 19: 1–49.
122. KelemanK, RajagopalanS, CleppienD, et al. Comm sorts robo to control axon guidance at the Drosophila midline. Cell 2002; 110: 415–27.
123. SabatierC, PlumpA, MaL, et al. The divergent Robo family protein rig-1/Robo3 is a negative regulator of slit responsiveness required for midline crossing by commissural axons. Cell 2004; 117: 157–69.
124. MarillatV, SabatierC, FailliV, et al. The slit receptor Rig-1/Robo3 controls midline crossing by hindbrain precerebellar neurons and axons. Neuron 2004; 43: 69–79.
125. SteinE, Tessier-LavigneM. Hierarchical organization of guidance receptors: silencing of netrin attraction by slit through a Robo/DCC receptor complex. Science 2001; 291: 1928–38.
126. ShawG, BrayD. Movement and extension of isolated growth cones. Exp Cell Res 1977; 104: 55–62.
127. HarrisW, HoltC, BonhoefferF. Retinal axons with and without their somata, growing to and arborizing in the tectum of Xenopus embryos: a time-lapse video study of single fibres in vivo. Development 1987; 101: 123–33.
128. CampbellD, HoltC. Chemotropic responses of retinal growth cones mediated by rapid local protein synthesis and degradation. Neuron 2001; 32: 1013–26.
129. BrittisP, LuQ, FlanaganJ. Axonal protein synthesis provides a mechanism for localized regulation at an intermediate target. Cell 2002; 110: 223–35.
130. RaperJA, MasonC. Cellular strategies of axonal pathfinding. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2: a001933
131. MingGL, SongHJ, BerningerB, et al. cAMP-dependent growth cone guidance by netrin-1. Neuron 1997; 19: 1225–35.
132. HöpkerVH, ShewanD, Tessier-LavigneM, et al. Growth-cone attraction to netrin-1 is converted to repulsion by laminin-1. Nature 1999; 401: 69–73.
133. CaiD, QiuJ, CaoZ, et al. Neuronal cyclic AMP controls the developmental loss in ability of axons to regenerate. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 4731–9.
134. NeumannS, BradkeF, Tessier-LavigneM, et al. Regeneration of sensory axons within the injured spinal cord induced by intraganglionic cAMP elevation. Neuron 2002; 34: 885–93.
135. QiuJ, CaiD, DaiH, et al. Spinal axon regeneration induced by elevation of cyclic AMP. Neuron 2002; 34: 895–903.
136. GaoY, DengK, HouJ, et al. Activated CREB is sufficient to overcome inhibitors in myelin and promote spinal axon regeneration in vivo. Neuron 2004; 44: 609–21.
137. BouchardJ-F, MooreSW, TritschNX, et al. Protein kinase A activation promotes plasma membrane insertion of DCC from an intracellular pool: a novel mechanism regulating commissural axon extension. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 3040–50.
138. MooreSW, KennedyTE. Protein kinase A regulates the sensitivity of spinal commissural axon turning to netrin-1 but does not switch between chemoattraction and chemorepulsion. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 2419–23.
139. EllerbroekSM, WennerbergK, BurridgeK. Serine phosphorylation negatively regulates RhoA in vivo. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 19023–31.
140. LangP, GesbertF, Delespine-CarmagnatM, et al. Protein kinase A phosphorylation of RhoA mediates the morphological and functional effects of cyclic AMP in cytotoxic lymphocytes. EMBO J 1996; 15: 510–19.
141. DavidS, AguayoAJ. Axonal elongation into peripheral nervous system “bridges” after central nervous system injury in adult rats. Science 1981; 214: 931–3.
142. KottisV, ThibaultP, MikolD, et al. Oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein (OMgp) is an inhibitor of neurite outgrowth. J Neurochem 2002; 82: 1566–9.
143. WangK, KoprivicaV, KimJ, et al. Oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein is a Nogo receptor ligand that inhibits neurite outgrowth. Nature 2002; 417: 941–4.
144. ChenM, HuberA, HaarM, et al. Nogo-A is a myelin-associated neurite outgrowth inhibitor and an antigen for monoclonal antibody IN-1. Nature 2000; 403: 434–9.
145. GrandPreT, NakamuraF, VartanianT, et al. Identification of the Nogo inhibitor of axon regeneration as a Reticulon protein. Nature 2000; 403: 439–44.
146. PrinjhaR, MooreSE, VinsonM, et al. Inhibitor of neurite outgrowth in humans. Nature 2000; 403: 383–4.
147. McKerracherL, DavidS, JacksonDL, et al. Identification of myelin-associated glycoprotein as a major myelin-derived inhibitor of neurite growth. Neuron 1994; 13: 805–11.
148. MukhopadhyayG, DohertyP, WalshFS, et al. A novel role for myelin-associated glycoprotein as an inhibitor of axonal regeneration. Neuron 1994; 13: 757–67.
149. SchwabM, BartholdiD. Degeneration and regeneration of axons in the lesioned spinal cord. Physiol Rev 1996; 76: 319–70.
150. WangK, KimJ, SivasankaranR, et al. P75 interacts with the Nogo receptor as a co-receptor for Nogo, MAG and OMgp. Nature 2002; 420: 74–8.
151. LiuB, FournierA, GrandPreT, et al. Myelin-associated glycoprotein as a functional ligand for the Nogo-66 receptor. Science 2002; 297: 1190–3.
152. DomeniconiM, CaoZ, SpencerT, et al. Myelin-associated glycoprotein interacts with the Nogo66 receptor to inhibit neurite outgrowth. Neuron 2002; 35: 283–90.
153. FournierA, GrandPreT, StrittmatterS. Identification of a receptor mediating Nogo-66 inhibition of axonal regeneration. Nature 2001; 409: 341–6.
154. CarulliD, LaabsT, GellerHM, et al. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in neural development and regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005; 15: 116–20.
155. McKeonRJ, JurynecMJ, BuckCR. The chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans neurocan and phosphacan are expressed by reactive astrocytes in the chronic CNS glial scar. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 10778–88.
156. TangX, DaviesJE, DaviesSJA. Changes in distribution, cell associations, and protein expression levels of NG2, neurocan, phosphacan, brevican, versican V2, and tenascin-C during acute to chronic maturation of spinal cord scar tissue. J Neurosci Res 2003; 71: 427–44.
157. JonesLL, MargolisRU, TuszynskiMH. The chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans neurocan, brevican, phosphacan, and versican are differentially regulated following spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2003; 182: 399–411.
158. BradburyEJ, MoonLDF, PopatRJ, et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 2002; 416: 636–40.
159. FisherD, XingB, DillJ, et al. Leukocyte common antigen-related phosphatase is a functional receptor for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan axon growth inhibitors. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 14051–66.
160. FryEJ, ChagnonMJ, López-ValesR, et al. Corticospinal tract regeneration after spinal cord injury in receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma deficient mice. Glia 2010; 58: 423–33.
161. ShenY, TenneyAP, BuschSA, et al. PTPsigma is a receptor for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, an inhibitor of neural regeneration. Science 2009; 326: 592–6.
162. SapiehaPS, DuplanL, UetaniN, et al. Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma inhibits axon regrowth in the adult injured CNS. Mol Cell Neurosci 2005; 28: 625–35.
163. ThompsonKM, UetaniN, ManittC, et al. Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma inhibits axonal regeneration and the rate of axon extension. Mol Cell Neurosci 2003; 23: 681–92.
164. GigerRJ, HollisER, TuszynskiMH. Guidance molecules in axon regeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2: a001867.
165. HarelNY, StrittmatterSM. Can regenerating axons recapitulate developmental guidance during recovery from spinal cord injury? Nat Rev Neurosci 2006; 7: 603–16.
166. RodgerJ, SymondsACE, SpringbettJ, et al. Eph/ephrin expression in the adult rat visual system following localized retinal lesions: localized and transneuronal up-regulation in the retina and superior colliculus. Eur J Neurosci 2005; 22: 1840–52.
167. LiuX, HawkesE, IshimaruT, et al. EphB3: an endogenous mediator of adult axonal plasticity and regrowth after CNS injury. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 3087–101.
168. Irizarry-RamírezM, WillsonCA, Cruz-OrengoL, et al. Upregulation of EphA3 receptor after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2005; 22: 929–35.
169. FabesJ, AndersonP, Yáñez-MuñozRJ, et al. Accumulation of the inhibitory receptor EphA4 may prevent regeneration of corticospinal tract axons following lesion. Eur J Neurosci 2006; 23: 1721–30.
170. GoldshmitY, GaleaMP, WiseG, et al. Axonal regeneration and lack of astrocytic gliosis in EphA4-deficient mice. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 10064–73.
171. Williams-HogarthL, PucheA, TorreyC, et al. Expression of semaphorins in developing and regenerating olfactory epithelium. J Comp Neurol 2000; 423: 565–78.
172. PasterkampRJ, GigerR, RuitenbergM, et al. Expression of the gene encoding the chemorepellent semaphorin III is induced in the fibroblast component of neural scar tissue formed following injuries of adult but not neonatal CNS. Mol Cell Neurosci 1999; 13: 143–66.
173. PasterkampRJ, WinterF, HoltmaatA, et al. Evidence for a role of the chemorepellent semaphorin III and its receptor neuropilin-1 in the regeneration of primary olfactory axons. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 9962–76.
174. TanelianD, BarryM, JohnstonS, et al. Semaphorin III can repulse and inhibit adult sensory afferents in vivo. Nat Med 1997; 3: 1398–401.
175. KanekoS, IwanamiA, NakamuraM, et al. A selective Sema3A inhibitor enhances regenerative responses and functional recovery of the injured spinal cord. Nat Med 2006; 12: 1380–9.
176. KikuchiK, KishinoA, KonishiO, et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel semaphorin 3A inhibitor, SM-216289 or xanthofulvin. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 42985–91.
177. KüryP, AbankwaD, KruseF, et al. Gene expression profiling reveals multiple novel intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with axonal regeneration failure. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 19: 32–42.
178. Moreau-FauvarqueC, KumanogohA, CamandE, et al. The transmembrane semaphorin Sema4D/CD100, an inhibitor of axonal growth, is expressed on oligodendrocytes and up-regulated after CNS lesion. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 9229–39.
179. WehrleR, CamandE, ChédotalA, et al. Expression of netrin-1, slit-1 and slit-3 but not of slit-2 after cerebellar and spinal cord lesions. Eur J Neurosci 2005; 22: 2134–44.
180. LöwK, CulbertsonM, BradkeF, et al. Netrin-1 is a novel myelin-associated inhibitor to axon growth. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 1099–108.
181. ManittC, WangD, KennedyTE, et al. Positioned to inhibit: netrin-1 and netrin receptor expression after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res 2006; 84: 1808–20.
182. EllezamB, Selles-NavarroI, ManittC, et al. Expression of netrin-1 and its receptors DCC and UNC-5H2 after axotomy and during regeneration of adult rat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci 2001; 168: 105–15.
183. PetrauschB, JungM, LeppertC, et al. Lesion-induced regulation of netrin receptors and modification of netrin-1 expression in the retina of fish and grafted rats. Mol Cell Neurosci 2000; 16: 350–64.
184. ManittC, ThompsonKM, KennedyTE. Developmental shift in expression of netrin receptors in the rat spinal cord: predominance of UNC-5 homologues in adulthood. J Neurosci Res 2004; 77: 690–700.
185. CohenA, MacklerS, SelzerM. Behavioral recovery following spinal transection: functional regeneration in the lamprey CNS. Trends Neurosci 1988; 11: 227–31.
186. ShifmanM, SelzerM. Expression of the netrin receptor UNC-5 in lamprey brain: modulation by spinal cord transection. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000; 14: 49–58.
187. BuffoA, ZagrebelskyM, HuberA, et al. Application of neutralizing antibodies against NI-35/250 myelin-associated neurite growth inhibitory proteins to the adult rat cerebellum induces sprouting of uninjured Purkinje cell axons. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 2275–86.
188. DubreuilCI, WintonMJ, McKerracherL. Rho activation patterns after spinal cord injury and the role of activated Rho in apoptosis in the central nervous system. J Cell Biol 2003; 162: 233–43.
189. FournierA, TakizawaB, StrittmatterS. Rho kinase inhibition enhances axonal regeneration in the injured CNS. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 1416–23.
190. WintonMJ, DubreuilCI, LaskoD, et al. Characterization of new cell permeable C3-like proteins that inactivate Rho and stimulate neurite outgrowth on inhibitory substrates. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 32820–9.
191. DerghamP, EllezamB, EssagianC, et al. Rho signaling pathway targeted to promote spinal cord repair. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 6570–7.
192. LehmannM, FournierA, Selles-NavarroI, et al. Inactivation of Rho signaling pathway promotes CNS axon regeneration. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 7537–47.
193. JalinkK, CorvenE, HengeveldT, et al Inhibition of lysophosphatidate- and thrombin-induced neurite retraction and neuronal cell rounding by ADP ribosylation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho. J Cell Biol 1994; 126: 801–10.
194. WongS, HenleyJ, KanningK, et al. A p75(NTR) and Nogo receptor complex mediates repulsive signaling by myelin-associated glycoprotein. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 1302–8.
195. YamashitaT, TuckerK, BardeY. Neurotrophin binding to the p75 receptor modulates Rho activity and axonal outgrowth. Neuron 1999; 24: 585–93.
196. YamashitaT, TohyamaM. The p75 receptor acts as a displacement factor that releases Rho from Rho-GDI. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 461–7.

References

1. SanesJR, LichtmanJW. Development of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Annu Rev Neurosci 1999; 22: 389–442.
2. LinW, BurgessRW, DominguezB, et al. Distinct roles of nerve and muscle in postsynaptic differentiation of the neuromuscular synapse. Nature 2001; 410: 1057–64.
3. YangX, ArberS, WilliamC, et al. Patterning of muscle acetylcholine receptor gene expression in the absence of motor innervation. Neuron 2001; 30: 399–410.
4. DeChiaraTM, BowenDC, ValenzuelaDM, et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK is required for neuromuscular junction formation in vivo. Cell 1996; 85: 501–12.
5. GlassDJ, DeChiaraTM, StittTN, et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK is required for neuromuscular junction formation and is a functional receptor for agrin. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1996; 61: 435–44.
6. KimN, StieglerAL, CameronTO, et al. Lrp4 is a receptor for agrin and forms a complex with MuSK. Cell 2008; 135: 334–42.
7. ZhangB, LuoS, WangQ, et al. LRP4 serves as a coreceptor of agrin. Neuron 2008; 60: 285–97.
8. HataY, SlaughterCA, SudhofTC. Synaptic vesicle fusion complex contains unc-18 homologue bound to syntaxin. Nature 1993; 366: 347–51.
9. RizoJ, SudhofTC. Snares and Munc18 in synaptic vesicle fusion. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 641–53.
10. PengJ, KimMJ, ChengD, et al. Semiquantitative proteomic analysis of rat forebrain postsynaptic density fractions by mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 21003–11.
11. BayesA, van de LagemaatLN, CollinsMO, et al. Characterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density. Nat Neurosci 2011; 14: 19–21.
12. HarrisKM. Structure, development, and plasticity of dendritic spines. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999; 9: 343–8.
13. NimchinskyEA, SabatiniBL, SvobodaK. Structure and function of dendritic spines. Annu Rev Physiol 2002; 64: 313–53.
14. KochC, PoggioT. A theoretical analysis of electrical properties of spines. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1983; 218: 455–77.
15. SabatiniBL, MaravallM, SvobodaK. Ca(2+) signaling in dendritic spines. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 349–56.
16. HeringH, ShengM. Dendritic spines: structure, dynamics and regulation. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 880–8.
17. PakDT, YangS, Rudolph-CorreiaS, et al. Regulation of dendritic spine morphology by SPAR, a PSD-95-associated RapGAP. Neuron 2001; 31: 289–303.
18. FialaJC, FeinbergM, PopovV, et al. Synaptogenesis via dendritic filopodia in developing hippocampal area CA1. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 8900–11.
19. O’DonnellWT, WarrenST. A decade of molecular studies of fragile X syndrome. Annu Rev Neurosci 2002; 25: 315–38.
20. GlausierJR, LewisDA. Dendritic spine pathology in schizophrenia. Neuroscience 2012 [Epub ahead of print]
21. ZivNE, SmithSJ. Evidence for a role of dendritic filopodia in synaptogenesis and spine formation. Neuron 1996; 17: 91–102.
22. MarrsGS, GreenSH, DaileyME. Rapid formation and remodeling of postsynaptic densities in developing dendrites. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4: 1006–13.
23. OkabeS, MiwaA, OkadoH. Spine formation and correlated assembly of presynaptic and postsynaptic molecules. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 6105–14.
24. EngertF, BonhoefferT. Dendritic spine changes associated with hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity. Nature 1999; 399: 66–70.
25. Maletic-SavaticM, MalinowR, SvobodaK. Rapid dendritic morphogenesis in CA1 hippocampal dendrites induced by synaptic activity. Science 1999; 283: 1923–7.
26. ParnassZ, TashiroA, YusteR. Analysis of spine morphological plasticity in developing hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Hippocampus 2000; 10: 561–8.
27. HumeRI, RoleLW, FischbachGD. Acetylcholine release from growth cones detected with patches of acetylcholine receptor-rich membranes. Nature 1983; 305: 632–4.
28. YoungSH, PooMM. Spontaneous release of transmitter from growth cones of embryonic neurones. Nature 1983; 305: 634–7.
29. SaboSL, McAllisterAK. Mobility and cycling of synaptic protein-containing vesicles in axonal growth cone filopodia. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 1264–9.
30. ChangS, De CamilliP. Glutamate regulates actin-based motility in axonal filopodia. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4: 787–93.
31. TashiroA, MindenA, YusteR. Regulation of dendritic spine morphology by the rho family of small GTPases: antagonistic roles of Rac and Rho. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10: 927–38.
32. VerhageM, MaiaAS, PlompJJ, et al. Synaptic assembly of the brain in the absence of neurotransmitter secretion. Science 2000; 287: 864–9.
33. AhmariSE, BuchananJ, SmithSJ. Assembly of presynaptic active zones from cytoplasmic transport packets. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3: 445–51.
34. ChowI, PooMM. Release of acetylcholine from embryonic neurons upon contact with muscle cell. J Neurosci 1985; 5: 1076–82.
35. FriedmanHV, BreslerT, GarnerCC, et al. Assembly of new individual excitatory synapses: time course and temporal order of synaptic molecule recruitment. Neuron 2000; 27: 57–69.
36. ZhaiRG, Vardinon-FriedmanH, Cases-LanghoffC, et al. Assembling the presynaptic active zone: a characterization of an active one precursor vesicle. Neuron 2001; 29: 131–43.
37. BreslerT, RamatiY, ZamoranoPL, et al. The dynamics of SAP90/PSD-95 recruitment to new synaptic junctions. Mol Cell Neurosci 2001; 18: 149–67.
38. ShapiraM, ZhaiRG, DresbachT, et al. Unitary assembly of presynaptic active zones from Piccolo-Bassoon transport vesicles. Neuron 2003; 38: 237–52.
39. RaoA, KimE, ShengM, et al. Heterogeneity in the molecular composition of excitatory postsynaptic sites during development of hippocampal neurons in culture. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 1217–29.
40. KimJH, HuganirRL. Organization and regulation of proteins at synapses. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1999; 11: 248–54.
41. WashbourneP, BennettJE, McAllisterAK. Rapid recruitment of NMDA receptor transport packets to nascent synapses. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 751–9.
42. OkabeS, KimHD, MiwaA, et al. Continual remodeling of postsynaptic density and its regulation by synaptic activity. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 804–11.
43. PrangeO, MurphyTH. Modular transport of postsynaptic density-95 clusters and association with stable spine precursors during early development of cortical neurons. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 9325–33.
44. BreslerT, ShapiraM, BoeckersT, et al. Postsynaptic density assembly is fundamentally different from presynaptic active zone assembly. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 1507–20.
45. GreerP, GreenbergM. From synapse to nucleus: calcium-dependent gene transcription in the control of synapse development and function. Neuron 2008; 59: 846–60.
46. YamagataM, SanesJ, WeinerJ. Synaptic adhesion molecules. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003; 15: 621–32.
47. BiedererT, SaraY, MozhayevaM, et al. SynCAM, a synaptic adhesion molecule that drives synapse assembly. Science 2002; 297: 1525–31.
48. SaraY, BiedererT, AtasoyD, et al. Selective capability of SynCAM and neuroligin for functional synapse assembly. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 260–330.
49. StagiM, FogelA, BiedererT. SynCAM 1 participates in axo-dendritic contact assembly and shapes neuronal growth cones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107: 7568–641.
50. FogelA, AkinsM, KruppA, et al. SynCAMs organize synapses through heterophilic adhesion. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 12516–30.
51. RobbinsE, KruppA, Perez de ArceK, et al. SynCAM1 adhesion dynamically regulates synapse number and impacts plasticity and learning. Neuron 2010; 68: 894–906.
52. DavisS, GaleNW, AldrichTH, et al. Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science 1994; 266: 816–9.
53. KullanderK, KleinR. Mechanisms and functions of Eph and ephrin signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3: 475–86.
54. FlanaganJG, VanderhaeghenP. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu Rev Neurosci 1998; 21: 309–45.
55. BuchertM, SchneiderS, MeskenaiteV, et al. The junction-associated protein AF-6 interacts and clusters with specific Eph receptor tyrosine kinases at specialized sites of cell–cell contact in the brain. J Cell Biol 1999; 144: 361–71.
56. TorresR, FiresteinBL, DongH, et al. PDZ proteins bind, cluster, and synaptically colocalize with Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Neuron 1998; 21: 1453–63.
57. DalvaMB, TakasuMA, LinMZ, et al. EphB receptors interact with NMDA receptors and regulate excitatory synapse formation. Cell 2000; 103: 945–56.
58. TakasuMA, DalvaMB, ZigmondRE, et al. Modulation of NMDA receptor-dependent calcium influx and gene expression through EphB receptors. Science 2002; 295: 491–5.
59. HenkemeyerM, ItkisOS, NgoM, et al. Multiple EphB receptor tyrosine kinases shape dendritic spines in the hippocampus. J Cell Biol 2003; 163: 1313–26.
60. KayserM, McClellandA, HughesE, et al. Intracellular and trans-synaptic regulation of glutamatergic synaptogenesis by EphB receptors. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 12152–216.
61. McClellandA, Sheffler-CollinsS, KayserM, et al. Ephrin-B1 and ephrin-B2 mediate EphB-dependent presynaptic development via syntenin-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 20487–579.
62. KayserM, NoltM, DalvaM. EphB receptors couple dendritic filopodia motility to synapse formation. Neuron 2008; 59: 56–125.
63. NoltMJ, LinY, HruskaM, et al. EphB controls NMDA receptor function and synaptic targeting in a subunit-specific manner. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 5353–64.
64. AttwoodBK, BourgognonJM, PatelS, et al. Neuropsin cleaves EphB2 in the amygdala to control anxiety. Nature 2011; 473: 372–5.
65. BattagliaAA, SehayekK, GristJ, et al. EphB receptors and ephrin-B ligands regulate spinal sensory connectivity and modulate pain processing. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 339–40.
66. CisseM, HalabiskyB, HarrisJ, et al. Reversing EphB2 depletion rescues cognitive functions in Alzheimer model. Nature 2011; 469: 47–52.
67. BiedererT, SudhofTC. Mints as adaptors. Direct binding to neurexins and recruitment of munc18. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 39803–6.
68. ScheiffeleP, FanJ, ChoihJ, et al. Neuroligin expressed in nonneuronal cells triggers presynaptic development in contacting axons. Cell 2000; 101: 657–69.
69. ChihB, EngelmanH, ScheiffeleP. Control of excitatory and inhibitory synapse formation by neuroligins. Science 2005; 307: 1324–32.
70. GrafE, ZhangX, JinS-X, et al. Neurexins induce differentiation of GABA and glutamate postsynaptic specializations via neuroligins. Cell 2004; 119: 1013–39.
71. KruegerD, TuffyL, PapadopoulosT, et al. The role of neurexins and neuroligins in the formation, maturation, and function of vertebrate synapses. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012; 22: 412–34.
72. ChubykinA, AtasoyD, EthertonM, et al. Activity-dependent validation of excitatory versus inhibitory synapses by neuroligin-1 versus neuroligin-2. Neuron 2007; 54: 919–31.
73. PoulopoulosA, AramuniG, MeyerG, et al. Neuroligin 2 drives postsynaptic assembly at perisomatic inhibitory synapses through gephyrin and collybistin. Neuron 2009; 63: 628–42.
74. SudhofT. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature 2008; 455: 903–11.
75. BiedererT, ScheiffeleP. Mixed-culture assays for analyzing neuronal synapse formation. Nat Protoc 2007; 2: 670–6.
76. LinhoffM, LaurénJ, CassidyR, et al. An unbiased expression screen for synaptogenic proteins identifies the LRRTM protein family as synaptic organizers. Neuron 2009; 61: 734–83.
77. Ito-IshidaA, MiuraE, EmiK, et al. Cbln1 regulates rapid formation and maintenance of excitatory synapses in mature cerebellar Purkinje cells in vitro and in vivo. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 5920–30.
78. UemuraT, LeeS-J, YasumuraM, et al. Trans-synaptic interaction of GluRdelta2 and neurexin through Cbln1 mediates synapse formation in the cerebellum. Cell 2010; 141: 1068–147.
79. WooJ, KwonS-K, ChoiS, et al. Trans-synaptic adhesion between NGL-3 and LAR regulates the formation of excitatory synapses. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 428–65.
80. BurdenSJ. Wnts as retrograde signals for axon and growth cone differentiation. Cell 2000; 100: 495–7.
81. HallAC, LucasFR, SalinasPC. Axonal remodeling and synaptic differentiation in the cerebellum is regulated by Wnt-7a signaling. Cell 2000; 100: 525–35.
82. CerpaW, GodoyJ, AlfaroI, et al. Wnt-7a modulates the synaptic vesicle cycle and synaptic transmission in hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 5918–27.
83. AlsinaB, VuT, Cohen-CoryS. Visualizing synapse formation in arborizing optic axons in vivo: dynamics and modulation by BDNF. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4: 1093–101.
84. Vicario-AbejonC, OwensD, McKayR, et al. Role of neurotrophins in central synapse formation and stabilization. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 965–74.
85. ElmariahSB, CrumlingMA, ParsonsTD, et al. Postsynaptic TrkB-mediated signaling modulates excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor clustering at hippocampal synapses. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 2380–93.
86. LuikartB, NefS, VirmaniT, et al. TrkB has a cell-autonomous role in the establishment of hippocampal Schaffer collateral synapses. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 3774–86.
87. UmemoriH, LinhoffMW, OrnitzDM, et al. FGF22 and its close relatives are presynaptic organizing molecules in the mammalian brain. Cell 2004; 118: 257–70.
88. TerauchiA, Johnson-VenkateshE, TothA, et al. Distinct FGFs promote differentiation of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Nature 2010; 465: 783–7.
89. DonoR. Fibroblast growth factors as regulators of central nervous system development and function. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2003; 284: R867–81.
90. ReussB, von Bohlen und HalbachO. Fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in the central nervous system. Cell Tissue Res 2003; 313: 139–57.
91. NaglerK, MauchDH, PfriegerFW. Glia-derived signals induce synapse formation in neurones of the rat central nervous system. J Physiol 2001; 533: 665–79.
92. PfriegerFW, BarresBA. Synaptic efficacy enhanced by glial cells in vitro. Science 1997; 277: 1684–7.
93. UllianEM, SappersteinSK, ChristophersonKS, et al. Control of synapse number by glia. Science 2001; 291: 657–61.
94. MauchDH, NaglerK, SchumacherS, et al. CNS synaptogenesis promoted by glia-derived cholesterol. Science 2001; 294: 1354–7.
95. UllianEM, ChristophersonKS, BarresBA. Role for glia in synaptogenesis. Glia 2004; 47: 209–16.
96. ChristophersonKS, UllianEM, StokesCC, et al. Thrombospondins are astrocyte-secreted proteins that promote CNS synaptogenesis. Cell 2005; 120: 421–33.
97. ErogluC. The role of astrocyte-secreted matricellular proteins in central nervous system development and function. J Cell Commun Signal 2009; 3: 167–76.
98. TaylorCP. Mechanisms of analgesia by gabapentin and pregabalin–calcium channel alpha2-delta [Cavalpha2-delta] ligands. Pain 2009; 142: 13–16.
99. El-HusseiniAE, SchnellE, ChetkovichDM, et al. PSD-95 involvement in maturation of excitatory synapses. Science 2000; 290: 1364–8.
100. PassafaroM, NakagawaT, SalaC, et al. Induction of dendritic spines by an extracellular domain of AMPA receptor subunit GluR2. Nature 2003; 424: 677–81.
101. SalaC, PiechV, WilsonNR, et al. Regulation of dendritic spine morphology and synaptic function by Shank and Homer. Neuron 2001; 31: 115–30.
102. LeeCH, HermanT, ClandininTR, et al. N-cadherin regulates target specificity in the Drosophila visual system. Neuron 2001; 30: 437–50.
103. SerafiniT. Finding a partner in a crowd: neuronal diversity and synaptogenesis. Cell 1999; 98: 133–6.
104. SuzukiSC, InoueT, KimuraY, et al. Neuronal circuits are subdivided by differential expression of type-II classic cadherins in postnatal mouse brains. Mol Cell Neurosci 1997; 9: 433–47.
105. WuQ, ManiatisT. A striking organization of a large family of human neural cadherin-like cell adhesion genes. Cell 1999; 97: 779–90.
106. WojtowiczWM, FlanaganJJ, MillardSS, et al. Alternative splicing of drosophila Dscam generates axon guidance receptors that exhibit isoform-specific homophilic binding. Cell 2004; 118: 619–33.
107. AngoF, di CristoG, HigashiyamaH, et al. Ankyrin-based subcellular gradient of neurofascin, an immunoglobulin family protein, directs GABAergic innervation at Purkinje axon initial segment. Cell 2004; 119: 257–72.
108. Colon-RamosD, MargetaM, ShenK. Glia promote local synaptogenesis through UNC-6 (netrin) signaling in C. elegans. Science 2007; 318: 103–6.
109. ScheiffeleP. Cell-cell signaling during synapse formation in the CNS. Annu Rev Neurosci 2003; 26: 485–508.
110. LiZ, ShengM. Some assembly required: the development of neuronal synapses. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4: 833–41.
111. HindgesR, McLaughlinT, GenoudN, et al. EphB forward signaling controls directional branch extension and arborization required for dorsal-ventral retinotopic mapping. Neuron 2002; 35: 475–87.
112. KatzLC, ShatzCJ. Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 1996; 274: 1133–8.
113. MalenkaRC, NicollRA. Long-term potentiation–a decade of progress?Science 1999; 285: 1870–4.
114. Tessier-LavigneM, GoodmanCS. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 1996; 274: 1123–33.
115. CatalanoSM, ShatzCJ. Activity-dependent cortical target selection by thalamic axons. Science 1998; 281: 559–62.
116. MingG, HenleyJ, Tessier-LavigneM, et al. Electrical activity modulates growth cone guidance by diffusible factors. Neuron 2001; 29: 441–52.
117. LendvaiB, SternEA, ChenB, et al. Experience-dependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo. Nature 2000; 404: 876–81.
118. ClineHT. Dendritic arbor development and synaptogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 118–26.
119. SinWC, HaasK, RuthazerES, et al. Dendrite growth increased by visual activity requires NMDA receptor and Rho GTPases. Nature 2002; 419: 475–80.
120. IsaacJT, CrairMC, NicollRA, et al. Silent synapses during development of thalamocortical inputs. Neuron 1997; 18: 269–80.
121. WuG, MalinowR, ClineHT. Maturation of a central glutamatergic synapse. Science 1996; 274: 972–6.
122. ZhangLI, PooMM. Electrical activity and development of neural circuits. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4: 1207–14.
123. Balice-GordonRJ, LichtmanJW. Long-term synapse loss induced by focal blockade of postsynaptic receptors. Nature 1994; 372: 519–24.
124. GodaY, DavisGW. Mechanisms of synapse assembly and disassembly. Neuron 2003; 40: 243–64.
125. ThompsonW, KufflerDP, JansenJK. The effect of prolonged, reversible block of nerve impulses on the elimination of polyneuronal innervation of new-born rat skeletal muscle fibers. Neuroscience 1979; 4: 271–81.
126. HebbDO. The Organization of Behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley Inc., 1949.
127. ShatzCJ, StrykerMP. Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat’s visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation. J Physiol 1978; 281: 267–83.
128. AntoniniA, StrykerMP. Rapid remodeling of axonal arbors in the visual cortex. Science 1993; 260: 1819–21.
129. Cohen-CoryS. The developing synapse: construction and modulation of synaptic structures and circuits. Science 2002; 298: 770–6.
130. ShenK, FetterRD, BargmannCI. Synaptic specificity is generated by the synaptic guidepost protein SYG-2 and its receptor, SYG-1. Cell 2004; 116: 869–81.
131. LiuXB, LowLK, JonesEG, et al. Stereotyped axon pruning via plexin signaling is associated with synaptic complex elimination in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 9124–34.
132. TranTS, RubioME, ClemRL, et al. Secreted semaphorins control spine distribution and morphogenesis in the postnatal CNS. Nature 2009; 462: 1065–9.
133. WalshMK, LichtmanJW. In vivo time-lapse imaging of synaptic takeover associated with naturally occurring synapse elimination. Neuron 2003; 37: 67–73.
134. AntoniniA, GillespieDC, CrairMC, et al. Morphology of single geniculocortical afferents and functional recovery of the visual cortex after reverse monocular deprivation in the kitten. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 9896–909.
135. WoolleyCS, McEwenBS. Estradiol mediates fluctuation in hippocampal synapse density during the estrous cycle in the adult rat. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 2549–54.
136. GrutzendlerJ, KasthuriN, GanWB. Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature 2002; 420: 812–16.
137. TrachtenbergJT, ChenBE, KnottGW, et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature 2002; 420: 788–94.
138. KirkwoodA, LeeHK, BearMF. Co-regulation of long-term potentiation and experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in visual cortex by age and experience. Nature 1995; 375: 328–31.
139. MatsuzakiM, HonkuraN, Ellis-DaviesGC, et al. Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature 2004; 429: 761–6.
140. OkamotoK, NagaiT, MiyawakiA, et al. Rapid and persistent modulation of actin dynamics regulates postsynaptic reorganization underlying bidirectional plasticity. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 1104–12.
141. MurakoshiH, WangH, YasudaR. Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines. Nature 2011; 472: 100–4.
142. CarmichaelST. Plasticity of cortical projections after stroke. Neuroscientist 2003; 9: 64–75.
143. CoulterDA, DeLorenzoRJ. Basic mechanisms of status epilepticus. Adv Neurol 1999; 79: 725–33.