Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:31:25.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER XXIII - PERSIA, c. 2400–1800 B.C.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Walther Hinz
Edited by
I. E. S. Edwards ,
C. J. Gadd  and
N. G. L. Hammond
Walther Hinz
Affiliation:
University of Gottingen
Get access

Summary

THE ELAMITE KINGS OF AWAN

The history of Persia before the migration of the Medes and the Persians in about 1000 b.c. is almost entirely limited to the history of Elam. This is because Elam, south-west Iran, alone has left behind any documents worthy of mention from the pre-Persian era. Only very few remnants of Akkadian inscriptions on rock reliefs survive from the non-Elamite part of south-west Iran. From the remainder of Persia there is silence until the coming of Zoroaster, the great prophet of eastern Iran (probable dates, 630–533 b.c.).

Compared with the long duration of the Elamite Kingdom, the actual number of documents surviving is indeed pitifully few. They are partly in Akkadian, and partly in Elamite, and to an overwhelming degree come from the age-old capital of Elam, Susa, which has been under excavation by a French archaeological mission ever since 1897. A further difficulty is that Elamite, being related to no other known language, is still insufficiently understood.

The ethnological definition of the Elamites also causes great difficulties. The most reasonable assumption is that which holds the Elamites to be the Proto-Lurs, whose language became Iranian only in the Middle Ages. The Elamites wrote the name of their country in cuneiform as Haltamti or Hatamti, which they probably pronounced altamt. This word may mean ‘God's Land’, if it is composed of hal ‘land’ and tamt [tämpt] ‘(gracious) Lord’. For the Sumerian and Akkadian neighbours, Elam (written with the Sumerian sign (NIM) was connected with the idea of ‘highland’–and rightly so, because although its frontiers fluctuated with the course of centuries, they always included not only the low plain of Susiana (with the river network of the Karkhah, the Āb-i Diz, and the Kārūn), but also the mountains and plateaux to the north and east of Susiana.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Ancient History
, pp. 644 - 680
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, W. F. ‘A Babylonian Geographical Treatise on Sargon of Akkad's Empire.’ In Journal of the American Oriental Society 45 (1925) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiet, P. ‘Glyptique susienne archaīque.’ In Revue d' Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 51 (1957) ff.Google Scholar
Amiet, P. ‘Représentations antiques de constructions susiennes.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 53 (1959) ff.Google Scholar
Amiet, P. ‘Il y a 5000 ans les Élamites inventaient l'écriture.’ In Archaeologia, 12 (1966) ff.Google Scholar
Amiet, P. Elam. Auvers-sur-Oise, 1966.Google Scholar
Barton, G. A. The Royal Inscriptions of Sumer and Akkad. New Haven, 1929.Google Scholar
Belaiew, N.T. ‘Métrologie élamite.’ In Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse 25 (1934) ff., 19 plates.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, A. Susa. Eine Studie zur alten Geschichte Westasiens. Leipzig, 1893.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R. M. ‘Datierte Glyptik der Akkade-Zeit.’ In Festschrift A. Moortgat. Berlin, 1964 ff.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R. M. ‘Die Datierung des Puzur/Kutik-Inšušinak und einige sich daraus ergebende Konsequenzen.’ In Orientalia n.s. 35 (1966) ff.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R. M. ‘Zur Datierung des Epirmupi.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 58 (1967) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bork, F. ‘Zur Religion der alten Elamier.’ In Zeitschrift für Missionskunde und Religions-PFissenschaft. 48 (1933) ff.Google Scholar
Bork, F. ‘Die elamische Klammer.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung (1933–4) ff.Google Scholar
Brice, W. C. ‘The Writing System of the Proto-Elamite Account Tablets of Susa.’ In Bulletin of the John Rylands Library (Manchester). 45 (1962) ff.Google Scholar
Cameron, G. G. History of Early Iran. Chicago, 1936.Google Scholar
Cameron, G. G. Persepolis Treasury Tablets. Chicago, 1948.Google Scholar
Christian, V. ‘Elam (ethnologisch).’ In Reallexikon der Assyriologie 2 (1938) ff.Google Scholar
Debevoise, N. C. ‘The Rock Reliefs of Ancient Iran.’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies 1 (1942) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhorme, E. ‘Elam.’ In Supplément au Dictionnaire de la Bible, 11 (Paris, 1934) ff.Google Scholar
D'yakonov, I. M. Istoriya Midii (History of Media). Moscow/Leningrad, 1956.Google Scholar
Edmonds, C. J. ‘Two Ancient Monuments in Southern Kurdistan.’ In Geographical Journal 65 (1925) f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edzard, E. O. ‘Enmebaragesi von Kiš.’ In Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 53 (1959) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edzard, D. O. Die ‘Zweite Zwischenzeit’ Babyloniens. Wiesbaden, 1957.Google Scholar
Edzard, D. O. ‘Neue Inschriften zur Geschichte von Ur III unter Šūsuen.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung. 19 (1959–60) ff.Google Scholar
Edzard, D. O. ‘Die Mythologie der Sumerer und Akkader.’ In Wörterbuch der Mythologie, Teil I : Vorderer Orient (Stuttgart, 1961) ff.Google Scholar
Eickstedt, E. . Türken, Kurden und Iraner seit dem Altertum. Stuttgart, 1961.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Ibbīsîn–Išbi'erra.’ In Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie. 49 (1950) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Die Ibbīsîn-Klage’. In Die Welt des Orients. 1 (1947–52) ff.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. Archaische Texte aus Uruk. Berlin/Leipzig, 1936.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. ‘Die Keilschrift.’ In Handbuch der Orientalistik, Erste Abt., Zweiter Band, Lieferung 1 (Leiden, 1959) ff.Google Scholar
Fish, T. ‘Towards a Study of Lagash “Mission” Or “Messenger” Texts.’ In Manchester Cuneiform Studies. ff. and ff.
Frank, C. ‘Elamische Götter.’ In Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie. 28 (1914) ff.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. Cylinder Seals. !A Documentary Essay on the Art and Religion of the Ancient Near East. London, 1939.Google Scholar
Friedrich, J. ‘Altpersisches und Elamisches.’ In Orientalia. n.s. 18 (1949) ff.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. J. and Legrain, L. Ur Excavations. Texts I : Royal Inscriptions. London, 1928.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. ‘The Date of the Cruciform Monument of Maništušu.’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies 8 (1949) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, I. J. Old Akkadian Writing and Grammar. Ed. 2. Chicago, 1961.Google Scholar
Gelderen, C. . ‘Elamietische Goden en Koningen.’ In Stemmen des Tijds, 13 (1924).Google Scholar
Genouillac, H. ‘Les dieux de I'Élam.’ In Recueil de travaux relatifs à la philologie et à I'arch/ologie égyptiennes et assyriennesRec. trav. 27 (1905) ff.Google Scholar
Ghirshman, R. L'Iran des origines à I'Islam. Paris, 1951.Google Scholar
Ghirshman, R. Fouilles de Sialk. Vol. 1, Paris, 1938.Google Scholar
Ghirshman, R. ‘Suse au début du II e millénaire avant notre ére et un sanctuaire iranien dans les monts des Zagros.’ In Comptes-Rendus de I'Acadimie des Inscriptions et BellesLettres, juillet-décembre 1965 (1966) ff.Google Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘Historical Allusions in Old Babylonian Omen Texts.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies 1 (1947) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. ‘Ḫulibar of Duddul.’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies 12 (1953) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güterbock,, H.-G. ‘Die historische Tradition und ihre literarische Gestaltung bei Babyloniern und Hethitern bis 1200.’ In Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 42 (1943) ff.Google Scholar
Hallo, W. W. Early Mesopotamian Royal Titles: A Philologic and Historical Analysis. New Haven, 1957.Google Scholar
Hallo, W. W. ‘Zāriqum.’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 15 (1956) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, A. Die Kultur um den Persischen Golf und ihre Ausbreitung (Klio, Beiheft 20). Leipzig, 1930.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, E. Archaeological History of Iran. London, 1935.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, E. Iran in the Ancient East. London, 1941.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, E. Am Tor von Asien. Berlin, 1920.Google Scholar
Hinz, W. ‘Zur Entzifferung der elamischen Strichschrift.’ In Iranica Antiqua, 2 (1962) ff.Google Scholar
Hinz, W. ‘Elamisches.’ In Archiv Orientálni. 18 (1950) ff.Google Scholar
Hinz, W. ‘Elamisch is-ma-lu.’ In OrientaliaOr. n.s. 19 (1950) ff.Google Scholar
Hinz, W. ‘Die elamischen Inschriften des Hanne.’ In Volume in Honour of S. H. Taqizadeh (London, 1962) ff.Google Scholar
Hinz, W. ‘Elamisch husa.’ In Orientalia. n.s. 31 (1962) ff.Google Scholar
Hinz, W. ‘Zu den Persepolis-Täfelchen.’ In Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlandischcn Gesellschaft 110 (1961) ff.Google Scholar
Hinz, W. ‘Elamica.’ In Orientalia n.s. 32 (1963) ff.Google Scholar
Hinz, W. Das Reich Elam. Stuttgart, 1964.Google Scholar
Hinz, W. ‘The Elamite God d.GAL.’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies 24 (1965) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinz, W. ‘Elams Vertrag mit Narām-Sîn von Akkade.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archüologie 58 (1967) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, H. ‘Die Inschriften der Könige von Agade.’ In Archiv f¨ Orientforschung. 10 (1963) ff.Google Scholar
Huart, C. and L., Delaporte L'Iran antique — Élam et Perse et la civilisation iranienne. Paris, 1943.Google Scholar
Hüsing, G. Die einheimischen Quellen zur Geschichte Elams. I. Teil: Altelamische Texte. Leipzig, 1916.Google Scholar
Hüsing, G. ‘Die Götter Elams.’ In Orientalistische Literaturzeitung. 9 (1905) ff.Google Scholar
Hüsing, G. ‘Der elamische Gott Memnon.’ In Mitteilungen der vorderasiatisch-ägyptischen Gesellschaft. 21 (1916) ff.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Th. The Sumerian King List. Chicago, 1939.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Th. Cuneiform Texts in the National Museum. Copenhagen/Leiden, 1939.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Th. ‘The Reign of Ibbī-Suen.’ In Journal of Cuneiform Studies. 7 (1953) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jean, Ch.-F. ‘L'Élam sous la Dynastie d'Ur.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' ArchMogie orientale. 19 (1922) ff.Google Scholar
Jensen, P. ‘Elamitische Eigennamen.’ In Wiener Zeitschrift fur die Kunde des Morgenlandes. 6 (1892) ff. ff.Google Scholar
Jones, T. B. and Snyder, J. W. Sumerian Economic Texts from the Third Ur Dynasty. Minneapolis, 1961.Google Scholar
Keiser, C. E. Selected Temple Documents of the Ur Dynasty (Yale Oriental Series. Babylonian Texts, IV). New Haven/London/Oxford, 1919.Google Scholar
König, F. W. Geschichte Elams. Leipzig, 1931.Google Scholar
König, F. W. Corpus Inscriptionum Elamicarum, I. Die altelamischen Texte. Tafeln. Hanover [1923].Google Scholar
König, F. W. ‘Zur Frage dGAL = napHutran.’ In Archiv fur Orientforschung. 2 (1924–5) ff.Google Scholar
König, F. W. ‘Pinikir.’ In Archiv fur Orientforschung. 5 (1928–9) ff.Google Scholar
Kōnig, F. W. Die elamischen Königsinschriften (Archiv für Orientforschung Beiheft 16). Graz, 1965.Google Scholar
Koschaker, P. ‘Göttliches und weltliches Recht nach den Urkunden aus Susa.’ In Orientalia. n.s. 4 (1935) ff.Google Scholar
Kramer, S. N. Lamentation over the Destruction of Ur. Chicago, 1940. Important review by Jacobsen, Th in American Journal of Semitic Languages and LiteraturesA. 58 (1941) ff.Google Scholar
Labat, R. ‘La mort du roi d'Élam Ḫumban-Ḫaltaš I.’ In Archiv Orientálni. 17 (1949) ff.Google Scholar
Labat, R. ‘Structure de la langue élamite.’ In Conférences de I' Institut de linguistique de I' Université de Paris, 9 (1950–1) ff.Google Scholar
Lambert, M. ‘Épigraphie élamite.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale. 49 (1955) ff. ff.Google Scholar
Landsberger, B. ‘Jahreszeiten im Sumerisch-Akkadischen.’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies 8 (1949) ff.Google Scholar
Langdon, S. Babylonian Menologies and the Semitic Calendars. London, 1935.Google Scholar
Le Breton, L. ‘The Early Periods at Susa, Mesopotamian Relations.’ In Iraq, 19 (1957) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leemans, W. F. ‘Trade Relations of Babylonia.’ In Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 3 (1960) ff.Google Scholar
Legrain, L. ‘Empreintes de cachets élamites.’ In Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse 16 (1921) ff., 23 plates.Google Scholar
Matouš, L. ‘Zur Chronologie der Geschichte von Larsa bis zum Einfall der Elamiter.’ In Archiv Orientálni. 20 (1952) ff.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. Elam als politischer und kultureller Faktor in der Geschichte des alten Orients. Regensburg, 1955 (Privatdruck).Google Scholar
Mayer, R. ‘Die Bedeutung Elams in der Geschichte des alten Orients.’ In Saeculum, 7 (1956) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCown, D.E. ‘The Material Culture of Early Iran.’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies 1 (1942) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mecquenem, R. de. ‘Épigraphie proto-élamite.’ In Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse 31 (1949) ff.Google Scholar
Mecquenem, R. de. ‘Notes protoélamites.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 50 (1956) ff.Google Scholar
Meer, P. . ‘De Agadeperiode—haar geschiedenis en cultuur.’ In Kernmomenten der antieke beschaving en haar moderne beleving (Leiden, 1947) ff.Google Scholar
Meier, G. ‘Die zweite Tafel der Serie bīt mèseri.’ In Archiv fur Orientforschung. 14 (1942) ff.Google Scholar
Mém, D. P. = Mémoires de la Délegation en Perse, vols. I–XIII, Paris, 1900–12; Mémoires de la Mission archéologique de Susiane, vol. XIV, Paris, 1913; Mémoires de la Mission archéologique de Perse, vols. XV–XXVIII, Paris, 1914–39; Mémoires de la Mission archéologique en Iran, vols. XXIX–XXXIII, Paris, 1943–53; vol. XXXVI, Paris, 1954; vol. XXXIV, Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
Meriggi, P. ‘L'Elamico.’ In Accademia Nax. dei Lincei, Quaderno 76 (1966) ff.Google Scholar
Osten, H. H. . Die Welt der Perser. Stuttgart, 1956.Google Scholar
Pézard, M. Mission à Bender-Bouchir. Documents archéologiques et épigraphiques. = Mém. D.P . 15 (1914) ff.Google Scholar
Poebel, A. ‘The Name of Elam in Sumerian, Akkadian, and Hebrew.’ In American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures 48 (1931–2) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poebel, A. Historical Texts (University of Pennsylvania. The University Museum. Publications of the Babylonian Section. 4, no. 1). Philadelphia, 1914.Google Scholar
Poebel, A. ‘Sumerische Untersuchungen IV.’ In Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie. 39 (1930) ff.Google Scholar
Poebel, A. ‘The Acropolis of Susa in the Elamite Inscriptions.’ In American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures. 49 (1932–3) ff.Google Scholar
Reich, J. J. ‘The Horse-Head Ideogram in the Proto-Elamite Script and Minoan B.’ In Kadmos, 2 (1963) f.Google Scholar
Reiner, Erica, ‘The Earliest Elamite Inscription?’ In Journal of Near Eastern Studies 24 (1965) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutten, M. ‘Les dieux de Tchogha Zembil.’ In Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse. 32 (1953) ff.Google Scholar
Rutten, M. ‘Glyptique susienne—empreintes et cylindres.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 44 (1950) ff., 6 plates.Google Scholar
Scheil, V. ‘Documents et arguments.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéogie orientale. 26 (1929) ff.Google Scholar
Scheil, V. ‘Dynasties élamites d'Awan et de Simaš.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéogie orientale 28 (1931) ff.Google Scholar
Scheil, V. ‘Diplomatica.’ In Hilprecht Anniversary Volume (Leipzig/London/Paris/Chicago, 1909) ff.Google Scholar
Scheil, V. ‘Textes funéraires.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale. 13 (1916) ff.Google Scholar
Scheil, V. ‘Passim.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale. 22 (1925) ff.Google Scholar
Scheil, V. ‘Textes de comptabilité proto-élamites.’ In Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse 26 (1935), 65 plates.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. F. Persepolis. Volume 11, Chicago, 1957. (Plates 27 and 28 = Elamite Bronze Plaque.)Google Scholar
Smith, S. ‘Notes on the Gutian Period.’ In Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. (1932) ff.Google Scholar
Soden,, Wolfram . ‘Sumer, Babylon und Hethiter bis zur Mitte des zweiten Jahrtausends v. Chr.’ In Propyläen-Weltgeschichte (Berlin, 1961) ff.Google Scholar
Sollberger, E. Corpus des inscriptions ‘royales’ présargoniques de Lagaš. Geneva, 1956.Google Scholar
Sollberger, E. ‘Surla chronologie des rois d'Ur et quelques problèmes connexes.’ In Archiv fur Orientforschung. 17 (1954–6) ff.Google Scholar
Speiser, E. A. Mesopotamian Origins. Philadelphia/London, 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strommenger, Eva . ‘Statueninschriften und ihr Datierungswert.’ In Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archüologie 53 (1959) ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strommenger, Eva . ‘Das Menschenbild in der altmesopotamischen Rundplastik von Mesilim bis Hammurapi.’ In Baghdader Mitteilungen I, (1960) ff.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F. Die sumerischen und akkadischen Königsinschriften. Leipzig, 1907.Google Scholar
Toscanne, P. ‘Études sur le serpent figure et symbole dans I'antiquité élemite.’ In Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse 12 (1911) ff.Google Scholar
Toscanne, P. ‘Notes sur quelques figurations d'animaux en Chaldée-Susiane.’ In Revue d'Assyriologie et d' Archéologie orientale 9 (1912) ff.Google Scholar
Ungnad, A. ‘Der Akkader Narâm-Sin und der Ägypter Mani.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung. 14 (1942) ff.Google Scholar
Ungnad, A. ‘Datenlisten.’ In Reallexikon der Assyriologie. 2 (1938) ff.Google Scholar
Vanden Berghe, L. Archéologie de I'Irān ancien. Leiden, 1959.Google Scholar
Virolleaud, Ch. ‘Quelques textes cunéiformes inédits.’ In Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie. 19 (1905–6) ff.Google Scholar
Weidner, E. F. ‘Historisches Material in der babylonischen Omina-Literatur.’ In Festschrift Meissner (Leipzig, 1928/9).Google Scholar
Weidner, E. ‘Das Reich Sargons von Akkad.’ In Archiv für Orientforschung. 16 (1952–3) ff.Google Scholar
Weissbach, F. H. ‘Neue Beiträge zur Kunde der susischen Inschriften.’ In Abh. Leipzig, 14, 7 (1894) ff.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×