Skip to main content
The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare
    • Online ISBN: 9781139054164
    • Book DOI:
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Warfare was the single biggest preoccupation of historians in antiquity. In recent decades fresh textual interpretations, numerous new archaeological discoveries and a much broader analytical focus emphasising social, economic, political and cultural approaches have transformed our understanding of ancient warfare. Volume II of this two-volume History reflects these developments and provides a systematic account, written by a distinguished cast of contributors, of the various themes underlying the warfare of the Roman world from the Late Republic to the sixth-century empire of Justinian and his successors. For each broad period developments in troop-types, equipment, strategy and tactics are discussed. These are placed in the broader context of developments in international relations and the relationship of warfare to both the state and wider society. Numerous illustrations, a glossary and chronology, and information about the authors mentioned supplement the text. This will become the primary reference work for specialists and non-specialists alike.


    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
  • 1 - International relations
    pp 1-29
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    Roman ways of thinking about the Roman empire and its neighbours largely precluded the creation of structures similar to those of the post-Renaissance West. To understand Roman international relations, this chapter first looks at the ideological frameworks within which they operated, and then deals with other aspects such decision-making and the role of governors. Under the Republic, the Senate received and sent embassies. Under the Principate, the emperor was the ultimate decision maker. Embassies went to and from the emperor. Under the Republic, the Senate debated any treaties entered into by governors, whereas under the Principate, all governors acted to some extent under the auspices of the emperor. It is a truism that religion and politics could not be separated in ancient Rome. This was never more the case than in interstate relations. The chapter also deals with the acts of symbolism and the issue of practicalities in diplomatic relations in the Roman empire.
  • 2 - Military forces
    pp 30-75
    • By Boris Rankov, Professor of Roman History, Royal Holloway, University of London
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    The period of the late Republic and early Principate is one in which Rome's military forces underwent a transformation in almost all aspects. C. Marius, a senator, used the popular revulsion against the aristocratic mismanagement of Rome's armies, obtained the command in Africa for himself. The army he employed to win his African victories had been subject to better individual training than before. In the course of Augustus' reign, a standing Roman army was set up on a permanent basis, under the command of the reigning emperor and the direct control of his appointed legates. The legions of the Principate were equipped with 120 cavalry. In the middle Republic, each legion had had 300, drawn from the very wealthiest members of society, including senators. Octavian, Caesar's great-nephew, stationed troops in Rome on a standing basis for the first time, although both he and his successors were careful as far as possible not to offend lingering Republican sensibilities.
  • 3 - War
    pp 76-121
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    This chapter discusses the types of war fought by the Roman army in the late Republic and Principate. It examines the context in which these conflicts occurred, their frequency, duration, decisiveness and results. Much of the chapter deals with strategy, or the practical factors such as intelligence, communications and logistics which impose limits upon it. It is convenient to divide the foreign wars fought by the army in this period into four broad groups: wars of conquest, wars to suppress rebellion, punitive expeditions, and wars fought in response to invasions or raids. Beyond the desire of the emperor to prevent the movement of troops for one operation causing problems in other areas, it is hard to see how any form of grand strategy could have coped with so many local, ever-changing problems. The strategy in civil wars was always simple and wars ended with the death of one of the rival leaders. Compromises were inevitably temporary.
  • 4 - Battle
    pp 122-157
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    A graphic pitched battle narrative or detailed description of a siege (complete with gruesome embellishments) was a must for any decent history. The tactical flexibility offered by the auxiliary units was especially valuable in the smaller-scale wars of the imperial period, and for frontier and internal security. This applied most of all to the part-mounted equitatae units. Naval battles were more likely to be influenced by the vagaries of weather and wind than land battles, so there could be some delay before conditions allowed a battle to take place. Rome had traditionally been a successful besieger and was able to maintain an army over the winter if necessary. Roman military thinking believed that a pitched battle fought on a fair or level battlefield would bring a certain victory. The tactical manuals provide some insight into how the Romans themselves explained their military success.
  • 5 - Warfare and the state
    pp 158-197
    • By Dominic , Professor of Ancient History, King’s College London, Richard , Professor of Ancient History, Royal Holloway, University of London
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    The extant literature of the Roman world of the late Republic and Principate has occasional brief references to soldiers' pay, preparations for particular campaigns and the burden of military expenses. The four centuries of the late Republic and Principate are supposed to have seen two major changes in Roman military provisioning: introduction of a civil administration supplying the dispersed units of the army of the Principate; and the abandonment of this system in the third century AD in favour of direct requisitioning of supplies by the army. The lack of ancient statistics makes it difficult to assess the overall impact of the Roman army and warfare on the economy of the Roman world. Six decades of regular civil wars ushered in a period of two centuries in which civil political conflicts did not escalate into war. The chapter also discusses this Roman revolution and the removal of the soldiery from the politics of the imperial centre.
  • 6 - War and Society
    pp 198-232
    • By Colin Adams, Senior Lecturer in Ancient History, University of Liverpool
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    This chapter discusses two themes related to Roman warfare in the late Republic and early Principate: the impact of society and social structures on the conduct of war, and the reciprocal effect of war on society. It focuses on the changing character of external wars in the late Republic, the pressures which this caused in Rome and Italy, both socially and politically, and how these were eventually to lead to internal or civil wars which tore the Roman Republic apart. No matter what the causes of wars were, there is no doubt that there was a massive influx of public and private wealth and slaves into Italy in the second century BC and beyond. The human cost of wars in Italy, and throughout the Mediterranean world, must have been great. The effect of Roman imperialism in the Mediterranean and beyond was determined not just by events on the ground, but in the political developments in the city of Rome itself.
  • 7 - International relations
    pp 233-269
    • By Mark Humphries, Professor of Ancient History, University of Swansea
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    The subjugation of barbarian envoys in front of Theodosius I, as depicted in the Constantnople's obelisk in 390, soon turned out to be hollow. The same barbarians later became embroiled in a series of conflicts that would seriously undermine the stability of the empire and eventually produce a very different balance of power between the empire and its neighbours. This chapter traces this changing balance of power in late antiquity and its ramifications for imperial international relations. After 378, the balance of power shifted in favour of Rome's enemies, as the Roman Empire was consistently on the retreat with any territorial expansion. The substantial geopolitical transformations experienced by the Empire between Diocletian and the Arab conquest affected its perspectives both in terms of the ideological underpinnings that guided policy and the goals it sought to achieve through diplomacy. The late Empire relied on a fluid decision-making process that meant the implementation of foreign policy was rarely consistent.
  • 8 - Military forces
    pp 270-309
    • By Hugh Elton, Professor of Ancient History and Classics, Trent University
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    This chapter examines the military forces of the Roman Empire in three parts: the structure of armies, the structure of regiments, and the structure of individual careers. The first section of the chapter deals with the structure of the Roman army above the level of operational units. All late Roman armies were made up of individual regiments that had their own histories and traditions. The second section focuses on establishment strengths, though regimental units were under strength for much of their existence. The third part deals with the structures of units made up of individuals. It is sometimes argued that the late Roman army suffered from severe shortages of manpower and was thus forced to rely on non-Roman manpower. Soldiers were either conscripts or volunteers, but it is not possible to assess the relative importance of the two. Conscripts also came from annual levies of both free Romans and barbarians settled within the empire.
  • 9 - War
    pp 310-341
    • By Michael Whitby, Professor of Ancient History, University of Warwick
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    War shaped the existence of the Roman empire, determined its decline and conditioned the nature of post-Roman structures. The majority of wars were undertaken in response to external threats, serious ones in contrast to the excuses which were sometimes exploited during the Republic to justify expansionist campaigns. Most warfare had the predictable rhythms imposed by seasons and logistics. In the east Roman commanders could forecast when Arab tribes would be inactive because of religious celebrations. It was usually to the Romans' advantage to confirm the cessation of hostilities with a formal agreement. In the east written treaties became increasingly more specific during the fifth century. Warfare was preceded by careful preparations, not just of men and material but also of information, as appears from a tenth-century account which purports to describe Constantine's practice. The traditional Latin religion had significance in structuring the lives of Roman soldiers, which was particularly relevant in a unit largely recruited from eastern provincials.
  • 10 - Battle
    pp 342-378
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    This chapter assesses the factors which distinguished Roman armies from their various opponents: the tactical roles of the different troops deployed; their training, discipline and morale; and whether their attitudes to and preparation for combat were equal to the operational tasks they faced. Like their predecessors, later Roman emperors and officers embarking on military operations had at their disposal a number of military treatises or tactica. While Roman cavalry became more effective in fulfilling its existing tactical roles, the fundamentals of mounted combat remained unchanged. Sieges constitute over half the military engagements in late antiquity. Given the relative rarity of large-scale Roman offensives before the sixth century, Roman troops were ordinarily in the role of defenders, and more likely to be limitanei than comitatenses. This changed perspective is evident in contemporary treatises, which hitherto dealt almost exclusively with offensive siegecraft.
  • 11 - Warfare and the state
    pp 379-423
    • By A. D. Lee, Senior Lecturer in Classics, University of Nottingham
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    The relationship between war and the state was always a close one throughout Roman history, but never more so than during late antiquity. During the early Empire the relationship between military and political power was particularly evident in two interrelated areas. Maintenance of the emperor's political position was dependent to a significant degree on the projection of an image of military success. During the course of late antiquity challenges to imperial power did periodically emerge from within the Empire's own armed forces. Some of these were the result of ambitious individuals exploiting the interests of troops for their own ends. Donatives and material incentives, and mutinies over slowness of or reductions in pay reflect the importance of economic dimensions and ramifications of military affairs. In the late fifth century, while the western half of the Empire ceased to exist as a political entity, the eastern half continued to exist in one form or another for a further millennium.
  • 12 - War and Society
    pp 424-458
    • By Andrew Fear, Lecturer in Ancient History, University of Manchester
  • DOI:
  • View abstract
    For inhabitants of the early Empire, the Roman army was a somewhat distant feature of society. In the realm of high politics the relationship between soldier and civilian had also changed greatly. The Roman state in the fourth century had become in most respects a para-military one. Work in the civil service was now described as militia. The militarization of society came with a general loss in esteem for the army. By its very nature and composition no army is likely to behave as if it were composed of angels and there is plenty of evidence of military brutality and abuse of civilians from the early Empire. On the other hand, there was also frequent pleading for exemption from conscription on the grounds that the prospective recruit did not meet the minimum standards for army life.

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A.Lintott , (1981) ‘What was the “ Imperium Romanum”?’, Greece and Rome 28: 53–67.

C.Pelling , (1993) ‘Tacitus and Germanicus’, in Luce and Woodman (1993).

J. S.Richardson , (1991) ‘Imperium Romanum: empire and the language of power’, Journal of Roman Studies 81: 1–9.

S.Mitchell , (1976) ‘Requisitioned transport in the Roman empire: a new inscription from Pisidia’, Journal of Roman Studies 66: 106–31.

T. D.Barnes , (1979) ‘The date of Vegetius’, Phoenix 33: 254–7.

R. C.McCail , (1978) ‘P. Gr. Vindob. 29788C: hexameter encomium on an unnamed emperor’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 98: 38–63.

C. E. P.Adams , (2001) ‘Feeding the wolf: logistics and the Roman army’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 14: 465–72.

F. E.Adcock , (1940) The Roman Art of War under the Republic. Cambridge, Mass.

R.Alston , (1994) ‘Roman military pay from Caesar to Diocletian’, Journal of Roman Studies 84: 113–23.

R.Alston , (1995) Soldier and Society in Roman Egypt. London and New York.

C.Ando , (2000) Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley and Los Angeles.

A. E.Astin , (1989) ‘Roman government and politics 200–134 B.C.’, The Cambridge Ancient History, ed. J.Boardman et al. 2nd edn. Cambridge 1970–2005. VIII, 163–96.

A.Aymard , (1961) ‘Les otages barbares au début de l’empire’, Journal of Roman Studies 51:.

D.Baatz , (1978) ‘Recent finds of ancient artillery’, Britannia 9: 1–17.

E.Badian , (1982) Review of Hopkins (1978), Journal of Roman Studies 72: 164–9.

R. S.Bagnall , (1977) ‘Army and police in upper Egypt’, Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 14: 67–86.

R. S.Bagnall , (1982) ‘Upper and lower guard posts’, Chronique d’Egypte 57: 125–8.

J. C.Balty , (1988) ‘Apamea in the second and third centuries A.D.’, Journal of Roman Studies 78: 91–104.

J.Barlow , and P.Brennan , (2001) ‘Tribuni Scholarum Palatinarum, c. A.D. 353–64: Ammianus Marcellinus and the Notitia Dignitatum’, Classical Quarterly 51: 237–54.

T. D.Barnes , (1985a) ‘The career of Abinnaeus’, Phoenix 39: 368–74.

T. D.Barnes , (1985b) ‘Constantine and the Christians of Persia’, Journal of Roman Studies 75: 126–36.

N. H.Baynes , (1937) ‘The death of Julian the Apostate in a Christian legend’, Journal of Roman Studies 27: 22–9.

D. J.Bederman , (2001) International Law in Antiquity. Cambridge.

F.Bérard , (1992) ‘Territorium legionis. Camps militaires et agglomérations civiles aux premiers siècles de l’empire’, Cahiers Glotz 3: 75–105.

H. W.Bird , (tr. and comm.) (1994) Liber de Caesaribus of Sextus Aurelius Victor (TTH 17). Liverpool.

A. D. H.Bivar , (1972) ‘Cavalry equipment and tactics on the Euphrates frontier’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 26: 271–91.

A. D. H.Bivar , (1983a) ‘The history of eastern Iran’, in Yarshater (1983) I.181–231.

A. D. H.Bivar , (1983b) ‘The political history of Iran under the Arsacids’, in Yarshater (1983) 1.21–99.

R. C.Blockley , (1972) ‘Dexippus, Priscus and the Thucydidean account of the siege of Plataea’, Phoenix 26: 18–27.

R. C.Blockley , (1985a) ‘Subsidies and diplomacy: Rome and Persia in late Antiquity’, Phoenix 39: 62–74.

A. B.Bosworth , (1977) ‘Arrian and the Alani’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 81: 217–55.

P. A.Brunt , (1950) ‘Pay and superannuation in the Roman army’, Papers of the British School at Rome 18: 50–71.

P. A.Brunt , (1962) ‘The army and the land in the Roman revolution’, Journal of Roman Studies 52: 69–86 (repr. and rev. in Brunt (1988) 240–80).

P. A.Brunt , (1975) ‘The administrators of Roman Egypt’, Journal of Roman Studies 65: 124–47 (repr. in Brunt (1990b) 215–54).

P. A.Brunt , (1983) ‘Princeps and equites’, Journal of Roman Studies 73: 42–75.

J. B.Bury , (1897) ‘The Nika riot’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 17: 92–119.

AlanCameron , and D.Schauer , (1982) ‘The last consul: Basilius and his diptych’, Journal of Roman Studies 72: 126–45.

AverilCameron , (1969/70) ‘Agathias on the Sassanians’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 23/4: 67–183.

AverilCameron , (1993) The Mediterranean World in Late Antiquity, A.D. 395–600. London.

J. B.Campbell , (1975) ‘Who were the “viri militares”?’, Journal of Roman Studies 65: 11–31.

J. B.Campbell , (1987) ‘Teach yourself how to be a general’, Journal of Roman Studies 77: 13–29.

J. B.Campbell , (2001) ‘Diplomacy in the Roman world, c. 500 B.C.–A.D. 235’, Diplomacy and Statecraft 12: 1–22.

J.-M.Carrié , and S.Janniard , (2000–2) ‘L’armée romaine dans quelques travaux récents’, Antiquité Tardive 8 (2000): 321–41; 9 (2001): 351–61; 10 (2002): 27–42.

P. J.Casey , (1996) ‘Justinian, the limitanei and Arab–Byzantine relations in the sixth century’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 9: 214–22.

P. E.Chevedden , , S.Gilbert , , D.Kagay , and Z.Shiller . (2000) ‘The traction trebuchet: a triumph of four civilizations’, Viator 31: 433–86.

P. E.Chevedden , (2000) ‘The invention of the counterweight trebuchet: a study in cultural diffusion’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 54: 72–116.

D. N.Christodoulou , (2002) ‘Galerius, Gamzigrad and the Fifth Macedonian Legion’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 15: 275–81.

E.Chrysos , (1978) ‘The title “Basileus” in early Byzantine international relations’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 32: 29–75.

M. H.Crawford , , L. J. F.Keppie , , J.R.Patterson , and M.Vercnocke , (1986) ‘Excavations at Fregellae, 1978–1984’, Papers of the British School at Rome 54: 40–68.

J.Creighton , (2000) Coins and Power in Late Iron Age Britain. Cambridge.

J.Crow , and A.Ricci , (1997) ‘Investigating the hinterland of Constantinople: interim report on the Anastasian long wall’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 10: 235–62.

K. R.Dark , (1992) ‘A sub-Roman re-defence of Hadrian’s Wall?’, Britannia 23: 111–20.

R. W.Davies , (1971b) ‘The Roman military diet’, Britannia 2: 122–42 (repr. in Davies (1989b) 187–208).

G. T.Dennis , (1981a) ‘Flies, mice and the Byzantine crossbow’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 7: 1–5.

G.Downey , (1940) ‘Justinian as Achilles’, Transactions of the Proceedings of the American Philological Association 71:.

G.Downey , (1950) ‘Aurelian’s victory over Zenobia at Immae in A.D. 272’, Transactions of the Proceedings of the American Philological Association 81: 57–68.

T.Drew-Bear , (1977) ‘A late-fourth century Latin soldier’s epitaph at Nakolea’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 81: 257–74.

J. W.Drijvers , and D.Hunt , (eds.) (1999) The Late Roman World and its Historian: Interpreting Ammianus Marcellinus. London.

R. P.Duncan-Jones , (1990) Structure and Scale in the Roman Economy. Cambridge.

R. P.Duncan-Jones , (1994) Money and Government in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.

R. P.Duncan-Jones , (1996) ‘The impact of the Antonine plague’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 9: 108–36.

J. W.Eadie , (1967) ‘The development of Roman mailed cavalry’, Journal of Roman Studies 57:.

C.Eilers , (2002) Roman Patrons of Greek Cities. Oxford.

J.Elsner , (1991) ‘Cult and sculpture: sacrifice in the Ara Pacis Augustae’, Journal of Roman Studies 81: 50–61.

H. W.Elton , (1996a) ‘Romans and Goths: recent approaches’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 9: 566–74.

L.Foxhall , (1990) ‘The dependent tenant: land leasing and labour in Italy and Greece’, Journal of Roman Studies 80: 97–114.

A.Frantz , (1988) Late Antiquity: A.D. 267–700 (The Athenian Agora 24). Princeton.

N. G.Garsoïan , (1983) ‘Byzantium and the Sasanians’, in Yarshater (1983) 1.568–92.

A.Gillett , (2003) Envoys and Political Communication in the Late Antique West, 411–533. Cambridge.

J. F.Gilliam , (1941) ‘The Dux Ripae at Dura’, Transactions of the Proceedings of the American Philological Association 72: 157–75.

C. M.Gilliver , (1996a) ‘Mons Graupius and the role of auxiliaries in battle’, Greece and Rome 43: 54–67.

W.Goffart , (1977) ‘The date and purpose of VegetiusDe re militari’, Traditio 33: 65–100.

R. M.Grant , (1980) ‘War – just, holy, unjust – in Hellenistic and early Christian thought’, Augustinianum 20: 173–89.

G.Greatrex , and J.Bardill , (1996) ‘Antiochus the Praepositus: a Persian eunuch at the court of Theodosius II’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 50: 171–97.

G.Greatrex , , R.Burgess , and H.Elton , (2005) ‘Urbicius, Epitedeuma: an edition, translation and commentary’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 98: 35–74.

G.Greatrex , (1997) ‘The Nika riot: a reapraisal’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 117: 60–86.

J. F.Haldon , (1975) ‘Some aspects of Byzantine military technology from the sixth to the tenth centuries’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 1: 11–47.

J. F.Haldon , (1990a) Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture. Cambridge.

J. F.Haldon , (1994) ‘Synonê: reconsidering a problematic term of middle Byzantine administration’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 18: 116–53.

M. W. C.Hassall , (1970) ‘Batavians and the Roman conquest of Britain’, Britannia 1: 131–6.

M. W. C.Hassall , (2000) ‘The army’, The Cambridge Ancient History, ed. J.Boardman et al 2nd edn. Cambridge 1970–2005. XI, 320–43.

C.Hawkes , (1929) ‘The Roman siege of Masada’, Antiquity 3: 195–213.

P. J.Hazell , (1981) ‘The Pedite Gladius’, Antiquaries Journal 61: 73–82.

M. F.Hendy , (1985) Studies in the Byzantine Monetary Economy, c. 300–1450. Cambridge.

V. M.Hope , (1997) ‘Words and pictures: the interpretations of Romano-British tombstones’, Britannia 28: 245–58.

K.Hopkins , (1980) ‘Taxes and trade in the Roman Empire, 200 B.C.–A.D. 400’, Journal of Roman Studies 70: 101–25.

G.Horsmann , (1991) Untersuchungen zur militärischen Ausbildung im republikanischen und kaiserzeitlichen Rom. Boppard am Rhein.

R. G.Hoyland , (2001) Arabia and the Arabs: From the Bronze Age to the Coming of Islam. London.

B.Isaac , (1988) ‘The meaning of the terms limes and limitanei’, Journal of Roman Studies 78: 125–47.

S. J.James , (1986) ‘Evidence from Dura-Europos for the origins of late Roman helmets’, Syria 63: 107–34.

A. H. M.Jones , (1953) ‘Military chaplains in the Roman army’, Harvard Theological Review 46: 239–40.

A. H. M.Jones , (1970) Review of Frank (1969), Journal of Roman Studies 60: 227–9.

W. E.Kaegi , (1992) Byzantium and the Early Islamic Conquests. Cambridge.

K.Kagan , (2006). The Eye of Command. Ann Arbor.

D. L.Kennedy , (2001) The Armies of the Caliphs: Military and Society in the Early Islamic State. London.

L. J. F.Keppie , (1997) ‘The changing face of the Roman legions’, Papers of the British School at Rome 65: 89–102.

E.Lacoste , (1890) ‘Les poliorcétiques d’Apollodore de Damas’, Revve des études grecques 3: 230–81.

S.Lauffer , (1971) Diokletians Preisedikt. Berlin.

A.Laumonier , (1934) ‘Notes sur une inscription de Stratonicée’, Revue des études anciennes 36: 85–7.

A. D.Lee , (1993a) ‘Evagrius, Paul of Nisibis and the problem of loyalties in the mid-sixth century’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 44: 569–85.

A. D.Lee , (1993b) Information and Frontiers: Roman Foreign Relations in Late Antiquity. Cambridge.

J. E.Lendon , (1999) ‘The rhetoric of combat: Greek military theory and Roman culture in Julius Caesar’s battle descriptions’, Classical Antiquity 18: 273–329.

R. P.Lindner , (1981) ‘Nomadism, horses and Huns’, Past and Present 92: 1–19.

M. A.Littauer , (1981) ‘Early stirrups’, Antiquity 55:.

T. J.Luce , and A. J.Woodman , (eds.) (1993) Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition. Princeton.

P.MacGeorge , (2002) Late Roman Warlords. Oxford.

R.MacMullen , (1959) ‘Roman imperial building in the provinces’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 64: 207–35.

R.MacMullen , (1960) ‘Inscriptions on armor and the supply of arms in the Roman Empire’, American Journal of Archaeology 64: 23–40.

R.MacMullen , (1966) Enemies of the Roman Order. Cambridge, Mass.

J. C.Mann , (1979) ‘Power, force and the frontiers of the empire’, Journal of Roman Studies 69: 175–83.

D. J. P.Mason , (1988) ‘Prata legionis in Britain’, Britannia 19: 163–90.

V. A.Maxfield , (1986) ‘Pre-Flavian forts and their garrisons’, Britannia 17: 59–72.

B.Meissner , (ed.) (2005) Krieg — Gesellschaft — Institutionen/War — Society — Institutions. Stuttgart.

R.Miles , (ed.) (1999) Constructing Identities in Late Antiquity. London.

F. G. B.Millar , (1981) ‘The world of the Golden Ass’, Journal of Roman Studies 71: 63–75.

F. G. B.Millar , (1982) ‘Emperors, frontiers and foreign relations, 31 B.C. to A.D. 378’, Britannia 13: 1–23.

F. G. B.Millar , (1984a) ‘The Mediterranean and the Roman revolution: politics, war and the economy’, Past and Present 102: 3–24 (repr. in Millar (2002) 215–37).

F. G. B.Millar , (1984b) ‘The political character of the classical Roman Republic’, Journal of Roman Studies 74: 1–19.

F. G. B.Millar , (1986) ‘Politics, persuasion and the people before the Social War, 150–90 B.C.’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 1–11.

F. G. B.Millar , (1988) ‘Government and diplomacy in the Roman empire during the first three centuries’, International History Review 10: 345–77.

F. G. B.Millar , (1989) ‘Political power in mid-Republican Rome: Curia or Comitium?’, Journal of Roman Studies 79: 138–50.

F. G. B.Millar , (1998) The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor.

N. P.Milner , (1993, 2 edn. 1996) Vegetius, Epitome of Military Science. (Translated Texts for Historians 16) Liverpool.

A.Momigliano , (1975) Alien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization. Cambridge.

N.Morley , (2001) ‘The transformation of Italy, 225–28 B.C.’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 50–62.

H.Mouritsen , (2001) Plebs and Popular Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.

K.Nagy , (2005) ‘Notes on the arms of the Avar heavy cavalry’, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 58.2:.

C.Nicolet , (1991) Space, Geography and Politics in the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor.

J. A.North , (1981) ‘The development of Roman imperialism’, Journal of Roman Studies 71: 1–9.

S. P.Oakley , (1985) ‘Single combat in the Roman republic’, Classical Quarterly 35: 392–410.

E.O’Gorman , (2000) Irony and Misreading in the Annals of Tacitus. Cambridge.

M.Pasquinucci , and S.Menchelli , (1999) ‘The landscape and economy of the territories of Pisae and Volaterrae (coastal north Etruria)’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 12: 123–41.

J. R.Patterson , (1987) ‘Crisis, what crisis? Rural change and urban development in imperial Apennine Italy’, Papers of the British School at Rome 55: 115–46.

N.Pollard , (2000) Soldiers, Cities and Civilians in Roman Syria. Ann Arbor.

W. M.Ramsay , (1925) ‘The speed of the Roman imperial post’, Journal of Roman Studies 15: 60–74.

P.Rance , (2003) ‘Elephants in warfare in late antiquity’, Acta Antiqua 43: 355–84.

P.Rance , (2004b) ‘Drungus, δρoU’γγo” and δρoUγγiστiς – a Gallicism and continuity in Roman cavalry tactics’, Phoenix 58: 96–130.

D. W.Rathbone , (1981) ‘The development of agriculture in the Ager Cosanus during the Roman republic: problems of evidence and interpretation’, Journal of Roman Studies 71: 10–23.

D. W.Rathbone , (1996) ‘The imperial finances’, The Cambridge Ancient History, ed. J.Boardman et al. 2nd edn. Cambridge 1970–2005 x, 309–23.

E.Rawson , (1971) ‘The literary sources for the pre-Marian Roman army’, Papers of the British School at Rome 39:.

E.Rawson , (1975) ‘Caesar’s heritage: Hellenistic kings and their Roman equals’, Journal of Roman Studies 65: 148–59.

M.Reddé , (1986) Mare Nostrum. Les infrastructures, le dispositif et l’histoire de la marine militaire sous l’empire romain (Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 260). Rome.

J. W.Rich , (1998) ‘Augustus’s Parthian honours, the temple of Mars Ultor and the arch in the Forum Romanum’, Papers of the British School at Rome 66: 71–128.

J. W.Rich , and G.Shipley (eds.) (1993) War and Society in the Roman World. London and New York.

I. A.Richmond , (1962) ‘The Roman siege-works at Masada’, Journal of Roman Studies 52: 142–55.

P.Sabin , (2000) ‘The face of Roman battle’, Journal of Roman Studies 90: 1–17.

R. T.Scott , (2000) ‘The triple arch of Augustus and the Roman triumph’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 13: 183–91.

R.Seager , (1997) ‘Perceptions of eastern frontier policy in Ammianus, Libanius and Julian (337–363)’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 47: 253–68.

R.Seager , (1999) ‘Roman policy on the Rhine and Danube in Ammianus’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 49: 579–605.

B. D.Shaw , (1984) ‘Bandits in the Roman Empire’, Past and Present 105: 3–52.

B. D.Shaw , (2000) ‘Rebels and outsiders’, The Cambridge Ancient History, ed. J.Boardman et al. 2nd edn. Cambridge 1970–2005. XII, 361–403.

P.Southern , (1989) ‘The numeri of the Roman imperial army’, Britannia 20: 81–140.

M. A.Speidel , (1992) ‘Roman army pay scales’, Journal of Roman Studies 82: 87–106.

M. P.Speidel , (1978b) The Religion of Jupiter Dolichenus in the Roman Army. Leiden.

M. P.Speidel , (1991) ‘Swimming the Danube under Hadrian’s eyes: a feat of the emperor’s Batavi Horse Guard’, Ancient Society 22: 277–82.

M. P.Speidel , (1996a) ‘Raising new units for the late Roman army: Auxilia Palatina’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 50: 163–70.

M. P.Speidel , (1996b) ‘Roman cavalry training and the riding school of the Mauritanian horseguard’, Antiquités africaines 32: 57–62.

P. A.Stadter , (1978) ‘The Ars tactica of Arrian: tradition and originality’, Classical Philology 73: 117–28.

V. G.Swann , and R. A.Philpott , (2000) ‘Legio xx vv and tile production at Tarbock, Merseyside’, Britannia 31: 55–67.

R.Syme , (1988) ‘Military geography at Rome’, Classical Antiquity 7: 227–51.

W. T. S.Tarver , (1995) ‘The traction trebuchet: a reconsideration of an early medieval siege engine’, Technology and Culture 36: 136–67.

J.Teall , (1965) ‘The barbarians in Justinian’s armies’, Speculum 40: 294–322.

R. S. O.Tomlin , (1972) ‘Seniores-luniores in the late Roman field army’, American Journal of Philology 93: 253–78.

H.von Petrikovits , (1975) Die Innenbauten römischer Legionslager während der Prinzipatszeit (Wiss. Abh. der Rhein.-Westf. Akad der Wiss. 56). Opladen.

A.Wallace-Hadrill , (1990) ‘Roman arches and Greek honours: the language of power at Rome’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 36: 143–81.

B. H.Warmington , (1953) Review of van Berchem (1952), Journal of Roman Studies 43: 173–5.

A.Watson , (1999) Aurelian and the Third Century. London.

E. L.Wheeler , (1993) ‘Methodological limits and the mirage of Roman strategy’, Journal of Military History 57: 7–41, 215–40.

MichaelWhitbyL. , () (2000d) ‘Pride and prejudice in Procopius’ Buildings: imperial images in Constantinople’, Antiquité tardive 8: 59–66.

M.WhitbyL. , () (tr.) (2000e) The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus. (Translated Texts for Historians 33) Liverpool.

Ch.Wirszubski , (1950) Libertas as a Political Ideal at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.

D.Woods , (1995b) ‘A note concerning the early career of Valentinian I’, Ancient Society 26: 273–88.

D.Woods , (1997) ‘The Emperor Julian and the passion of Sergius and Bacchus’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 5: 355–67.

G.Woolf , (1996) ‘Monumental activity and the expansion of empire’, Journal of Roman Studies 86: 22–39.

G.Woolf , (1998) Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilisation in Gaul. Cambridge.

E.Yarshater , (ed.) (1983) The Cambridge History of Iran III (2 vols.). Cambridge.

C.Zuckerman , (1998) ‘Two reforms of the 370s: recruiting soldiers and senators in the divided empire’, Revue des études byzantines 56: 79–139.