Skip to main content
×
Home
The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Sistrunk, Timothy G. 1991. The emperor is married to the res publica: A legal analogy of Cino da Pistoia. Journal of Medieval History, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 115.


    Davis, Scott 2001. Doing What Comes Naturally: Recent Work on Thomas Aquinas and the New Natural Law Theory. Religion, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 407.


    Warner, David A. 2013. Ottonian Germany.


    Prior, Charles W. A. 2013. Religion, Political Thought and the English Civil War. History Compass, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 24.


    Fowler, Elizabeth 1995. The Failure of Moral Philosophy in the Work of Edmund Spenser. Representations, Issue. 51, p. 47.


    Zielonka, Jan 2011. America and Europe: two contrasting or parallel empires?. Journal of Political Power, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 337.


    Skinner, Alexander 2015. Violence at Constantinople in A.D. 341–2 and Themistius, Oration 1. Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 105, p. 234.


    Zielonka, Jan 2013. The International System in Europe: Westphalian Anarchy or Medieval Chaos?. Journal of European Integration, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450
    • Online ISBN: 9781139055390
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This volume, first published in 1988, offers a comprehensive and authoritative account of the history of a complex and varied body of ideas over a period of more than a thousand years. A work of both synthesis and assessment, The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought presents the results of several decades of critical scholarship in the field, and reflects in its breadth of enquiry precisely that diversity of focus which characterised the medieval sense of the 'political', preoccupied with universality at some levels, and with almost minute particularity at others. Thus among the vital questions explored by the distinguished team of contributors are the nature of authority, of justice, of property; the problem of legitimacy, of allegiance, of resistance to the powers that be; the character and function of law, and the role of custom in sustaining a social structure. While the predominant emphasis of the volume is necessarily upon those ideas that developed within Latin Christendom, full weight is also given to the impact of Byzantine, Jewish, and Islamic thought, and the whole comprises a unique distillation of knowledge upon a multi-faceted screen.

Reviews

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 2


  • 1 - Christian doctrine
    pp 9-20
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.003
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The early Christians understood the Church to which they adhered to consist of a community called out to serve God as his people and focused on Jesus of Nazareth as model for the disciples' filial relation to God. Reconciliation and peace are words occurring frequently in early Christian texts. The Pauline tradition freely employed military metaphors for the Christian struggle against evil. By the third century Latin-speaking Christians had come to describe the unbaptised as 'pagani', the soldiers' slang for civilians, uninvolved in the conflict with evil powers. The conversion of Constantine was an event of catalytic significance for the conversion of Europe. Augustine has the utmost reserve before the application o f the Biblical eschatology to legitimate the imperial Christian monarchy. The early Christians influenced subsequent political theories, into the twentieth century, by holding a religious position which entailed a relativism about the use of power in this world.
  • 2 - Greek and Roman political theory
    pp 21-36
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.004
  • View abstract
    Summary
    European political philosophy had its first home in Greece, in a society made up of numerous small city-states, each with its own laws, customs and constitution. Plato's interests in political theory were continued, from a more empirical standpoint, by his erstwhile pupil Aristotle. Aristotle saw politics as a prime concern for the moral philosopher, since he believed that only in a political community can a fully human life be realised. Under the Roman Empire, philosophy became increasingly theological. The dominant school was a revived Platonism, enriched with Aristotelian and Stoic teachings. After Alexander, Greek political history is one of kingdoms; and Greek political theory came to concentrate on questions to do with kingship. In Eusebius' laudation, the Hellenistic monarch reappears in aggressively Christian guise; notably absent, since quite unnecessary, is any attempt to disguise Constantine's absolute monarchy with the 'forms of a commonwealth'. The irony of Julian's progress towards 'Caesaropapism' reflected a broader irony.
  • 3 - Roman law
    pp 37-48
    • By P.G. Stein, Regius Professor of Civil Law, University of Cambridge
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.005
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Knowledge of Roman law was transmitted to later ages through two main bodies of material, first the so-called barbarian codes, and secondly, the Corpus luris of the Emperor Justinian, enacted in the 530s. From the third century BC, there was a class of legal experts, the jurists, who, although they had no formal role to play in the legal drama, provided any advice that was required, so replacing the pontiffs as guardians of the law. The most ambitious part of Justinian's codification is the Digest, an anthology of extracts from the writings o f thirty-nine classical jurists but over one third of them taken from the works of Ulpian and one sixth from those of Paul. Roman law was further divided, following a Greek model, into ius scriptum, written law, and ius non scriptum, unwritten law. Like the Bible, Justinian's Corpus luris was a vast quarry from which principles and maxims of different kinds could be extracted.
  • 4 - Byzantine political thought
    pp 49-80
    • By D.M. Nicol, King's College, University of London
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.006
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The Byzantine Empire, or the Byzantinisation of the Roman Empire, began with the conversion to Christianity of Constantine and his foundation of Constantinople on the site of the ancient Greek city of Byzantium. At once the main elements of Byzantine political thought are gathered together in one sentence. Eusebius praised Constantine for imitating the divine philanthropy and reflecting as in a mirror the radiance of God's virtues. Byzantine society after the fourth century produced little in the way of political theorising. The most realistic of all pieces of advice and the most illustrative of the facts of Byzantine political thought is surely the De Administrando Imperio compiled by Constantine Porphyrogenitus. A different undercurrent of thought can sometimes be glimpsed in what might be called the literature of Byzantine protest, or satire. The City of Constantinople, the New Rome, the Queen of Cities, remained to the end one of the anchors of Byzantine political thought.
  • 5 - Introduction: the West
    pp 81-91
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The revolution in the Christian Church's mode of existence was only one facet of the varied and complex changes brought by the first 'wave', the transformation of the Roman world in the third and fourth centuries into its characteristically 'late Roman' shape. In helping to bring about a redirection of Christian political thought it was, however, unquestionably the major factor at work in the minds of the Christian writers of the fourth and fifth, and indeed subsequent, centuries, perceptible in Christian thinking about society even in modern times. The second wave of change, the invasions and settlement of Germanic barbarians in Roman provinces, affected the conditions for political thinking no less profoundly, though less directly, and over a more drawn-out period. In the Greco-Roman political tradition the barbarian was the outsider. Education in the Roman world had been based on the Hellenistic legacy.
  • 6 - The Latin fathers
    pp 92-122
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.008
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Ambrose's crowning work on Christian Morality is the professional hand book addressed to clergy, De officiis ministrorum. Several o f the subjects to which Augustine devoted serious thought are directly related to problems of political life. Most important among these for the purpose are his views on the Roman Empire, its place in the divine plan of salvation and its relationship to Christianity; human nature and relationships in society, and the effect of the fall up on them; the Church and secular world; religious coercion; and the just war. There are two important sources for Gregory's ideas about society. The first was his wide reading of the works of previous Christian writers, the Latin fathers, especially Augustine, and Greek writers. The second was his acquaintance with various traditions of monastic life, his admiration for one of its towering figures, St Benedict, and his own attachment to monastic ideals.
  • 7 - The barbarian kingdoms
    pp 123-154
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.009
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The Germanism, Romanitas and Christianity worked as shaping influences upon all the barbarian kingdoms. The concepts of empire and emperor current c. 400 reveal the interpenetration of Roman and Christian thinking particularly clearly. The empire was traditionally conceived of as the political and cultural expression of the single community which was all mankind worth'y of the name. To the emperors, the barbarians controlling the west at best held by precarious tenure, at worst were squatters. Christian themes dominate ideas of rulership and government in the later Merovingian kingdom, as they do those in contemporary England. Isidore's thought, reflecting secular Roman as well as biblical and patristic, especially Augustinian and Gregorian, ideas, was immensely influential within the Visi gothic kingdom, both in his own day and after. In denying political universalism Isidore may appear to have been expressing the common viewpoint of the post-Justinianean barbarian west, where no writer testifies to the currency of the old ideology.
  • 8 - Introduction: the formation of political thought in the west
    pp 155-173
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Western Europe during the four centuries that precede the establishment of the Carolingian monarchy in 751 saw the conversion to Catholic Christianity of the barbarian successor kingdoms within the limits o f the western empire and their progressive withdrawal from Byzantium's sphere of influence. So many changes took place in western society during these four centuries that no single term such as feudalism or feudal government suffices to characterise the bonds of society or the nature of rulership. The origins and attributes of the medieval nobility in the Carolingian period and after are still much debated, largely because of the difficulty of constructing genealogies and thereby defining the noble class. Kingship rested on the consent of a king's subjects. The Carolingian empire constituted an example of a state in which Catholic Christianity was a compulsory religion. Throughout this period political philosophy was recognised as one of the disciplines of study.
  • 9 - Government, law and society
    pp 174-210
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.011
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter unravels the main lines of development in the monarchy built by the Carolingians in the eighth and ninth centuries. It deals with manorialism and feudalism. After the downward spiral had reached bottom in the eleventh century, the opposite movement, towards strengthening the monarchy and the role of central government, got under way all over Europe. The chapter discusses what feudalism exactly meant and what role it really played in European society from the days of Charlemagne to those of Barbarossa, Henry II and Philip Augustus. One can find in Anglo-Saxon England a society without feudalism but with widespread manorialism, and in Germany a Grundherrschaft existed on allodial land which its lord did not hold from anyone. The glossators gave their early attention to feudal institutions and made interesting attempts to reduce the oddities to the universal standards of Roman law.
  • 10 - Kingship and empire
    pp 211-251
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.012
  • View abstract
    Summary
    For ideas of kingship, the period c. 750 to c. 1150 was no longer one of beginnings but of consolidation. In the eighth century the Frankish kings Pippin and Charlemagne successfully mobilised two elites, the higher clergy of the Frankish Church and the Frankish aristocracy. In tracing the development of ideas about kingship, 750 is a more defensible starting-point than most periodisations of history. The Roman Empire contained many dependent regna: this was enough of a commonplace to be included in Isidore's Etymologies. The rapid weakening of West Frankish kingship towards the close of the ninth century led to a reinforcing of the theocratic central prop of Carolingian political thought. In political ideas, as in institutions and royal ritual, English developments were influenced by Carolingian models, yet retained some traits of their own. In the Anglo-Norman realm as in France, the Investiture Contest evoked from pro-royal polemicists a successful reassertion of royal theocracy.
  • 11 - Church and papacy
    pp 252-305
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.013
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The Catholic Church is body, in which one desires through good works to be made members. The image of the Church as the single indivisible corpus Christi appears frequently in Carolingian public documents, especially in the appeals for unity in the reign of Louis the Pious, when the empire was threatened by civil war. The most influential version of the image to emerge from the struggles of the reform papacy was that the Roman church was the head of the corpus Christi. Canon law studies had been initiated in the mid-eighth century by the papacy, the educator of Western Christendom in all things Roman. The political theology of the Middle Ages was dominated by a single sententia, the passage of the letter of Pope Gelasius I to the Emperor Anastasius I of 494. Gelasius' definition of the relations of imperium and sacerdotium reflects the situation of the patristic age.
  • 12 - The twelfth-century renaissance
    pp 306-338
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.014
  • View abstract
    Summary
    C. H. Haskins in his classic study, The Renaissance of the Twelfth Century, emphasised the influence of Rome, the ancient Rome of rulers and lawyers as well as of philosophers and writers. In the Bible, in the works of the Church Fathers and in the classical writings of the pagans, there was a wealth of reflection on the goal of human life and on the government of society. This legacy of thought was vigorously disseminated to a wider and more literate audience. By mid-century, however, Biblical scholarship was again being applied to subjects of political thought. One of the most learned men to use classical sources to provide examples of virtue and vice was John of Salisbury, especially in his longest work, the Policraticus or Statesman's Book. The arrival in the thirteenth century of Latin translations of Greek texts of Aristotle's Ethics and Politics occurred after new ideas about natural philosophy had begun to be current in the West.
  • 13 - Introduction: politics, institutions and ideas
    pp 339-366
    • By J.P. Canning, University College of North Wales, Bangor
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.015
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The main preoccupation of political thought in the high Middle Ages was clearly the relationship between the church and secular rulers, and in particular that between the papacy and the empire. From the mid-twelfth century the papacy was characterised above all by its development as a legal and governmental institution. A great political development occurred in the later Middle Ages: the growth of representative institutions. In the period after the mid-twelfth century the sheer volume of writings which may be considered to have contributed to political thought increased markedly. The chief innovation of late medieval political thought was the development of the idea of the secular state as a product of man's political nature. The adoption of the ultimately Aristotelian idea of a natural political dimension facilitated a clear distinction between church and state. From the late twelfth century onwards canonists and civilians developed ideas of territorial sovereignty, thus reflecting trends in contemporary government.
  • 14 - Spiritual and temporal powers
    pp 367-423
    • By J.A. Watt, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.016
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The spiritual power has both to establish the temporal power and to judge it if it fails to do good. This chapter seeks to identify three main areas within which debate focused on the significance of dualism. It begins with the papal position since this was the earliest to be systematically articulated, was the one urged, with all the weight of the Church's magisterium, on the politicians and intellectuals of Christendom, and gave substance and direction to the policies adopted in that hurly-burly of international politics in which the papacy was such an enthusiastic participant. The most important single stimulus to the development of hierocratic theory was the papacy's special relationship with the Holy Roman Empire. Imperialists provided an alternative view of that relationship. Other challenges to the papacy's own concept of its political authority came from national kings. Those mounted by the kings of France and England are considered representative of the attitudes of medieval Christian kingship generally.
  • I - Law, legislative authority, and theories of government, 1150–1300
    pp 424-453
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The passages in Roman law touching upon the emperor's right to legislate were open to contradictory interpretations. Roman law provided the jurists of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries with many definitions of sovereignty, but the classical Roman jurisconsults had never analysed legislative authority, jurisdiction, or delegated power in any systematic way. The classical Roman lawyers defined the emperor's authority to legislate, command, and judge as imperium or potestas. The canon lawyers of the twelfth century constructed a complex doctrine of papal sovereignty. The hierarchical state of the church was also a limitation on papal sovereignty. Much of medieval corporate theory was based on Roman terminology and definitions. The jurists expanded the scope and importance of Roman law corporate theory remarkably quickly. Canonistic corporate theory described an intricate relationship between the head of a universitas and its members. There is a large literature discussing ecclesiastical elections in which the canonists thoroughly examined the nature of governmental office and jurisdiction.
  • II - Law, sovereignty and corporation theory, 1300–1450
    pp 454-476
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.018
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Jurists made crucial advances in corporation theory producing thereby a specifically juristic contribution to the emergence of the idea of the state. In all juristic works divine law, natural law, and the ius gentium provided necessary criteria according to which human positive law could be judged. Feudal custom appeared as a fundamental ethical norm, and one which severely limited the sovereignty of the princeps. Jurists first developed a theory of territorial sovereignty to accommodate emerging territorial monarchies. Juristic theory of the sovereignty of city-republics was relatively late in emerging. It was the achievement of Bartolus to produce it, and his thesis, together with Baldus' creative treatment of this theme, constituted a major contribution to late medieval theories of popular sovereignty. Fourteenth-century jurists, however, went beyond theories of territorial sovereignty: through their application of corporation theory to independent cities and kingdoms they made major and quite distinctive contributions to the development of the concept of the territorial state itself.
  • 16 - Government
    pp 477-519
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In order to discuss medieval theories of government one must first locate them. This chapter is divided into two categories: the speculations of university-trained intellectuals, and the documents produced as an offshoot of the political process. The first category comprises the vision of secular government conceived by theologians like John of Paris and William of Ockham in the course of their reflections on church-state conflict; quodlibetic discussions in the Paris theology faculty; Aquinas' political writings; commentaries on Aristotle's Ethics and Politics. This category also includes the means by which university-trained intellectuals often popularised at least a portion of their political ideas, the 'Mirrors of Princes' and the sermons. The second category is more heterogeneous, and is the work of customary and common lawyers, Beaumanoir, Glanvill, Bracton, Fleta and, on a more political plane, Fortescue, who strove to systematise, explain and defend the legal systems they knew, which could not be done without some political thinking.
  • I - Community, counsel and representation
    pp 520-572
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.020
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The words community, council and representation reflect an organic vision of society, in which communication between men is unproblematic because the individual is not taken into account in the overall analysis. This is the explanation of the supreme importance of the idea of community which dominates all social and political organisations. By the end of the fourteenth century and the beginning of the fifteenth theorists had to deal with the political community from more or less fixed viewpoints, in particular that of the kingdom. One of the most important aspects of communal life in the middle ages is reflected in the widespread use of the terms counsel and council. Canon law's contribution to the development of the idea of representation is contained in the declaration Quod omnes tangit, and its concrete applications. It was only with the work of Marsilius of Padua in the fourteenth century that the idea of representation came to occupy a prominent place in political thought.
  • II - The conciliar movement
    pp 573-587
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.021
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The conciliar movement of the late fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries was an attempt to modify and limit papal control over the Church b y means of general councils. Conciliarism is divided into three phases: (i) 1378-83, when its advocates drew extensively on Marsiglio and, especially, Ockham; (ii) 1408-18, when a quasi-patristic doctrine of power-sharing between pope and bishops-in-council was dominant; (iii) 1432-50, when unlimited sovereignty was claimed for an internally democratic council. The most systematic available statement of community sovereignty was that of Marsilius, who had stated as general norms the legislative sovereignty of 'the corporation of citizens' and the final authority of 'the corporation of the faithful' in doctrinal and ecclesiastical matters. Nicholas of Cusa combined the canonist notion of consent with the Christian-Neoplatonic notion of cosmic 'harmonious concord'; on this basis he worked out both a theory of conciliar supremacy in the Church and a theory of just authority for all polities.
  • 18 - The individual and society
    pp 588-606
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.022
  • View abstract
    Summary
    An economic and entrepreneurial individualism was inherent in the development of commerce and capitalism from the twelfth century onwards. Economic changes began to replace the feudal system and traditional communities with a money economy and social mobility. The scholastics and jurists occasionally discussed the relation between society and the individual explicitly, and in a surprisingly modern way. Medieval jurists maintained a clear working distinction, based on Roman law and dictated by the kinds of problem they were expected to resolve, between an association and its individual members. They distinguished between the powers, liabilities and possessions belonging to the whole, and those belonging to individuals. In the fifteenth century, social theory was frequently the handmaid of political ideology. The self-development of the individual was now elevated into a principal duty and goal in life. The Renaissance and the Reformation served to elevate both the individual and the nation-state.
  • 19 - Property and poverty
    pp 607-648
    • By Janet Coleman, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.023
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Private property was justified for the convenience and utility of men. Poverty is a relative notion, determined by what is taken to be privation and the needs of men in different contexts. The tradition of Roman law was invoked, as was the newly translated corpus of Aristotle's writing, to elaborate on the naturalness of ownership and the necessity of private property as an instrument of the good life and the ordered society. Drawing on the mass of civil and canon law as well as on the newly translated Politics of Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas developed a magisterial and synthetic theory of property in his Summa Theologiae. Augustine had spoken of the poor without resources who could scarcely procure what they needed to live on and who needed charitable aid to such a degree as no longer to possess any shame in begging. The rise of diverse religious orders and movements in the twelfth century is best described as a reformation.

Page 1 of 2


This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


Hincmar of Rheims, Explanatio in ferculum Salomonis, PL 125 : ‘Ecclesiam…multis in Scriptura vocatur nominibus, ut est regnum coelorum, mulier, sponsa, uxor, columba, dilecta, vinea, ovis, ovile, civitas, turris, columna, firmamentum, domus, templum, corpus Christi, sagena, coena, et aliis quae lector forte poterit invenire.’

C.P. Jones (1978). The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom, Harvard University Press

H.-G. Beck (1960). ‘Reichsidee und nationale Politik im spätbyzantinischen Stadt’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 53; repr. in Beck1972, no. VI.

A. Heisenberg (1905). ‘Kaiser Johannes Batatzes der Barmherzige’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 14: 193–235

D.M. Nicol (1979). Church and Society in the Last Centuries of Byzantium, Cambridge University Press

S. Runciman (1977). The Byzantine Theocracy, Cambridge University Press

W. Sickel (1898). ‘Das byzantinische Krönungsrecht bis zum 10. Jahrhundert’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 7: 511–57

F.E. Cranz (1950). ‘De Civitate Dei xv.2 and Augustine's Idea of a Christian Society’, Speculum 25; repr. in Markus1972a, pp. 404–21

P. Grierson (1941). ‘Election and Inheritance in Early Germanic Kingship’, Cambridge Historical Journal 7

R.S. Hartigan (1966). ‘Saint Augustine on War and Killing: The Problem of the Innocent’, Journal of the History of Ideas 27

R.A. Markus (1985). ‘The Sacred and the Secular: From Augustine to Gregory the Great’, Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 36: 84–96.

M. Reydellet (1981). La Royauté dans la littérature latine de Sidoine Apollinaire à Isidore de Seville, Ecole Française de Rome, Palais Farnése

J.M. Bak (1973). ‘Medieval Symbology of the State: Percy E. Schramm's Contribution’, Viator 4

M. Maḥdi (1975). ‘Science, Philosophy and Religion in Alfarabi's Enumeration of the Sciences’, in J.E. Murdoch and E.D. Sylla (eds.) The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 26. Synthese Library, 76), Reidel

A. Marongiu (1964). ‘A Model State in the Middle Ages: The Norman and Swabian Kingdom of Sicily’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 6

C.E. Odegaard (1945). ‘The Concept of Royal Power in Carolingian Oaths of Fidelity’, Speculum 20

R.E. Pepin (1975). ‘The “Entheticus” of John of Salisbury: A Critical Text’, Traditio, 31

R. Rouse and M.A. (1967). ‘John of Salisbury and the Doctrine of Tyrannicide’, Speculum 42

A. Wilmart (1920). ‘Les Allegories sur l'Ecriture attribuées à Rhaban Maur’, Revue Bénédictine 32: 47ff

J. Yver (1971). ‘Le ‘Très Ancien Coutumier” de Normandie, miroir de la législation ducale? Contribution à l'étude de l'ordre public normand à la fin du Xlle siècle’, Revue d'Histoire du Droit 39

T. Gregory (1975a). ‘La nouvelle idée de nature et de savoir scientifique au XIIe siècle’, in J.E. Murdoch and E.D. Sylla (eds.) The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 26. Synthese Library, 76), Reidel

E. Hallam (1982). ‘Royal Burial and the Cult of Kingship in France and England, 1060–1330’, Journal of Medieval History 8

J.C. Holt (1982). ‘Feudal Society and the Family in Early Medieval England, I: The Revolution of 1066’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5 series, 32

C. Munier (1966). ‘Nouvelles recherches sur l'Hispana chronologique’;. Revue des Sciences religieuses 40: 400ff

R. Nineham (1963). ‘The So-Called Anonymous of York’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 14

I.S. Robinson (1978a). ‘ “Periculosus Homo”: Pope Gregory VII and Episcopal Authority’, Viator 9: 103ff

C. Duggan (1962). ‘The Becket Dispute and Criminous Clerks’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 35

O. Meyer (1935). ‘Überlieferung und Verbrietung des Dekrets des Bischofs Burchard von Worms’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Kanonistische Abteilung 24: 141ff

J.L. Nelson (1983b). ‘The Church's Military Service in the Ninth Century: A Contemporary Comparative View?’, Studies in Church History 20

J. Rivière (1925). ‘In partem sollicitudinis: évolution d'une formule pontificale’. Revue des sciences religieuses 5: 210ff

B.S. Scholz (1970). Carolingian Chronicles: Royal Frankish Annals and Nithard's Histories, University of Michigan Press

J. Wollasch (1957). ‘Eine adlige familie des frühen Mittelalters’, Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 39

A. Angenendt (1973). ‘Tanfe und Politik im frühen Mittelalter’, Frühmittelalterliche Studien 7

R. Deshman (1980). ‘The Exalted Servant: The Ruler Theology of the Prayerbook of Charles the BaldViator 11

B.G. Dod (1982). ‘Aristotles latinus’, in N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, J. Pinborg (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy from the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism 1100–1600, Cambridge Univeristy Press

E. Magnou (1964). ‘Note sur le sens du mot fevum en Septimanie et dans la marche d'Espagne à la fin du Xe et au début du Xle siècle’, Annales du Midi 76

K.F. Morrison (1980). ‘Otto of Freising's Quest for the Hermeneutic Circle’, Speculum 55: 207–36

J.L. Nelson (1977c). ‘On the Limits of the Carolingian Renaissance’, Studies in Church History 14: 61–9

J.L. Nelson (1985). ‘Public “Histories” and Private History in the Work of Nithard’, Speculum 60: 251–93

T.F.X. Noble (1976). ‘The Monastic Ideal as a Model for Empire: The Case of Louis the Pious’, Revue Bénédictine 86: 31–45

C.E. Odegaard (1941). ‘Carolingian Oaths of Fidelity’, Speculum 16

F. Olivier-Martin (1938). ‘Le roi de France et les mauvaises coutumes au moyen âge’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Germanistische Abteilung 58: 108–37

G. Spiegel (1975). ‘The Cult of St Denys and Capetian Kingship’, Journal of Medieval History 1

L. Strauss (1953). ‘Maimonides' Statement on Political Science’, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 22

H. Cam (1940). ‘The Decline and Fall of English Feudalism’, History 25

H.E.J. Cowdrey (1981). ‘The Anglo-Norman Laudes Regiae’, Viator 12

R. DeAragon (1982). ‘The Growth of Secure Inheritance in Anglo-Norman England’, Journal of Medieval History 8

E. Kennan (1967). ‘The “De consideratione” of St Bernard of Clairvaux and the Papacy in the Mid-Twelfth Century: A Review of Scholarship’, Traditio 23: 73–115

M. Kerner (1979). ‘Natur und Gesellschaft bei Johannes von Salisbury’ in A. Zimmermann (ed.) Soziale Ordnungen im Selbstverständnis des Mittelalters (Miscellanea Mediaevalia. Veröffentlichungen des Thomas-Instituts der Universität zu Köln, Band 12/1), W. de Gruyter

J. Dunbabin (1982). ‘The Reception and Interpretation of Aristotle's Polities’, in N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny and J. Pinborg (eds.) Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge University Press

R.E. Giesey (1961). ‘The Juristic Basis of Dynastic Right to the French Throne’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., 51, 5

P. Glorieux (1925a). ‘Prélats français contre religieux mendiants (1281–90)’, Revue d'histoire de l'église de France, 11

P.S. Lewis (1968). Later Medieval France: The Polity, Macmillan

William D. McCready (1973). ‘Papal plenitudo potestatis and the Source of Temporal Authority in Late Medieval Hierocratic Theory’, Speculum 48: 654–74

William D. McCready (1975). ‘Papalists and Anti-Papalists: Aspects of the Church–State Controversy in the Later Middle Ages’, Viator 6

A.S. McGrade (1974). The Political Thought of William of Ockham. Personal and Institutional Principles (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, Third Series, 7), Cambridge University Press

A.S. McGrade (1982). ‘Rights, Natural Rights and the Philosophy of Law’, in N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny and J. Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge University Press

J. Quillet (1964).‘L'organisation de la société humaine selon le Defensor Pacis de Marsile de Padoue’, in Beiträge zum Berufsbewusstsein des mittelalterlichen Menschen, Miscellanea Mediaevalia3

J. Quillet (1971). ‘Universitas populi et représentation au XlV e siècle’, in Der Begriff des Repraesentatio im Mittelalter, Miscellanea Mediaevalia8

C. Zuckermann (1975). ‘The Relationship of Theories of Universals to Theories of Church Government in the Middle Ages: A Critique of Previous Views’, Journal of the History of Ideas 36

M. Blecher (1975). ‘Aspects of Privacy in the Civil Law’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 43

J. Coleman (1984). ‘FitzRalph's Antimendicant proposieio (1350) and the Politics of the Papal Court at Avignon’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 35

W.R. Jones (1966). ‘Bishops, Politics and the Two Laws: The Gravamina of the English Clergy, 1237 to 1399’, Speculum 41

Q. Skinner (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, vol. I: The Renaissance, Cambridge University Press

G. Spiegel (1977). ‘Defence of the Realm: The Evolution of a Capetian Propaganda Slogan’, Journal of Medieval History 3

B. Tierney (1954). ‘Ockham, the Conciliar Theory and the Canonists’, Journal of the History of Ideas 15

W. Ullmann (1979a). ‘This Realm of England is an Empire’, The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 30, 2

M.J. Wilks (1965). ‘Predestination, Property and Power: Wyclif's theory of Dominion and Grace’, Studies in Church History 2

A.H. Chroust (1947). ‘The Corporate Idea and the Body Politic in the Middle Ages’, Review of Politics 9

M. Dowling (1984). ‘Humanist Support for Katherine of Aragon’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 57

J. Miethke (1969). Ockhams Weg zur Sozialphilosophie, W. de Gruyter

L. Minio-Paluello (1956). ‘Remigio Girolami's De Bono Communi: Florence at the Time of Dante's Banishment and the Philosopher's Answer to the Crisis’, Italian Studies 11

F. Oakley (1981). ‘Natural Law, the Corpus Mysticum, and Consent in Conciliar Thought from John of Paris to Mathias Ugonis’, Speculum 56; repr. in Oakley1984a

Pocquet du Haut-Jussé, (1971). ‘A Political Concept of Louis XI: Subjection instead of Vassalage’, in P.S. Lewis (ed.), The Recovery of France in the Fifteenth Century, Macmillan

Z. Rueger (1964). ‘Gerson, the Conciliar Movement and the Right of Resistance’, Journal of the History of Ideas 25

R. Tuck (1979). Natural Rights Theories, their Origin and Development, Cambridge University Press

J.A. Wahl (1974). ‘Baldus de Ubaldis: A Study in Reluctant Conciliarism’, Manuscripta 18: 21–9

J. A. Watt (1965b). ‘Medieval Deposition Theory: A Neglected Canonist Consultatio from the First Council of Lyons’, Studies in Church History 2

P. Weimar (1967). ‘Die Erstausgabe der sogenannten Lectura Institutionum des Pierre de Belleperche’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 35

William E. Brynteson (1966). ‘Roman Law and Legislation in the Middle Ages’, Speculum 41

C.W. Bynum (1980). ‘Did the Twelfth Century Discover the Individual?’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 31: 1–17

J.P. Canning (1987). The Political Thought of Baldus de Ubaldis (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, Fourth Series, 6), Cambridge University Press

J. Coleman (1985). ‘Dominium in Thirteenth and Fourteenth-century Political Thought and Its Seventeenth-Century Heirs: John of Paris and Locke’, Political Studies 33: 73–100

P.S. Lewis (1962). ‘The failure of the French medieval estates’, Past and Present 23

P. Sigmund (1963). Nicholas of Cusa and Medieval Political Thought, Harvard University Press

B. Tierney (1953). ‘The Canonists and the Medieval State’, Review of Politics 15: 40–70

B. Tierney (1963b). ‘Bracton on Government’, Speculum 38

J.H. Denton (1980). Robert Winchelsey and the Crown 1294–1313: A Study in the Defence of Ecclesiastical Liberty, Cambridge University Press

G.R. Elton (1956). ‘The Political Creed of Thomas Cromwell’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, 6

N. Fryde (1979). The Tyranny and Fall of Edward II, 1321–1326, Cambridge University Press

J. Goody (1983). The development of the Family and Marriage in Europe, Cambridge University Press

C. Partee (1960). ‘Peter John Olivi: Historical and Doctrinal Study’, Franciscan Studies 20

B. Tierney (1965). ‘The Continuity of Papal Political Theory in the Thirteenth Century. Some Methodological Considerations’, Mediaeval Studies 27

C.T. Wood (1967). ‘Regnum Franciae: A Problem in Capetian Administrative Usage’, Traditio 23

J. Barnes (1982). ‘The Just War’, in Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge University Press

W.W. Buckland and A.D. McNair (1952). Roman Law and Common Law: A Comparison in Outline, rev. 2nd edn, ed. F.H. Lawson, Cambridge University Press

D. Burr (1976). ‘The Persecution of Peter Olivi’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., 66

A. Harding (1980). ‘Political Liberty in the Middle Ages’, Speculum 55

P. Michaud-Quantin (1962). ‘Collectivités médiévales et institutions antiques’, Antike und Orient im Mittelalter, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 1

E. Miller (1952). ‘The State and Landed Interest in Thirteenth Century France and England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, 2

F. Oakley (1962). ‘On the Road from Constance to 1688’, Journal of British Studies 1; repr. in Oakley1984a

J.A. Wahl (1970). ‘Immortality and Inalienability: Baldus de Ubaldis’, Mediaeval Studies 32

J.A. Wahl (1977). ‘Baldus de Ubaldis and the Foundations of the Nation-State’, Manuscripta 21, 2

R. Wielockx (1980), ‘La censure de Gilles de Rome’, Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 22

R.G. Witt (1971). ‘The Landlord and the Economic Revival of the Middle Ages in Northern Europe 1000–1250’, American Historical Review 76

J.W. Baldwin (1959). ‘The Medieval Theories of the Just Price: Romanists, Canonists and Theologians in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series, 49

R.B. Brooke (1959). Early Franciscan Government: Elias to Bonaventure, Cambridge University Press

J. Coleman (1982). ‘The Continuity of Utopian Thought in the Middle Ages: A Reassessment’, Vivarium 20

J. Crook (1976). ‘Classical Roman Law, the Sale of Land’, in M.I. Finley (ed.) Studies in Roman Property, Cambridge University Press

F. Oakley (1969). ‘Figgis, Constance and the Divines of Paris’, American Historical Review 75; repr. in Oakley1984a

C. Thouzellier (1957). ‘La pauvreté, arme contre l'albigéisme’, Revue de l'histoire des religions 151

B. Tierney (1963a). ‘“ The Prince is not Bound by the Laws”: Accursius and the Origins of the Modern State’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 5

R.L. Benson (1968). The Bishop-Elect: A Study in Medieval Ecclesiastical Office, Princeton University Press

J.H. Burns (1985). ‘Fortescue and the Political Theory of dominium’, Historical Journal 28: 777–97

J.P. Canning (1983). ‘Ideas of the State in Thirteenth and Fourteenth-Century Commentators on the Roman Law’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, 33

William D. McCready (1974). ‘The Problem of the Empire in Augustinus Triumphus and Late Medieval Papal Hierocratic Theory’, Traditio 30

P.N. Riesenberg (1969). ‘Civism and Roman Law in Fourteenth-Century Italian Society’, Explorations in Economic History 7

E. Lewis (1940). ‘Natural law and Expediency in Medieval Political Theory’, Ethics 50

L.K. Little (1971). ‘Pride Goes before Avarice: Social Change and the Vices in Latin Christendom’, American Historical Review 76

T.P. McLaughlin (1939). ‘The Teaching of the Canonists on Usury’, Mediaeval Studies 1: 81–147

B. Tierney (1982). Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought (1150–1650), Cambridge University Press

K. Walsh (1975). ‘Archbishop FitzRalph and the Friars at the Papal Court in Avignon, 1357–60’, Traditio 31

C.H. Bezemer (1981). ‘A repetitio by Jacques de Révigny on the Creation of the ius gentuimTijdschrift voor Rechts geschiedenis 49: 287–321

Th. N. Bisson (1978). ‘The Problem of Feudal Monarchy: Aragon, Catalonia, and France’, Speculum 53

P. Boehmer (1943). ‘Ockham's Political Ideas’, Review of Politics 5: 462–87

P. Brown (1961). ‘Religious Dissent in the Later Roman Empire: The Case of North Africa’, History 46: ; repr. in Brown1972

P. Brown (1964). ‘St Augustine's Attitude to Religious Coercion’, Journal of Roman Studies 54; repr. in Brown1972

F.E. Cranz (1952). ‘Kingdom and Polity in Eusebius of Caesarea’, Harvard Theological Review 45

G. D'Amelio (1972). ‘Il Dictionarium iuris di Jacques de Révigny’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 40

P. Delhaye (1949). ‘L'enseignement de la philosophic morale au XIIe siècle’, Medieval Studies 11: 77–99

J. Ph. Lévy (1957). ‘La pénétration du droit savant dans les coutumiers angevins et bretons au moyen âge’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 25: 1–53

A. Linder (1977a). (1977b). ‘John of Salisbury's Policraticus in Thirteenth-Century England: The Evidence of MS Cambridge Corpus Christi College 469’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 40

B. Lyon (1957–8). ‘Medieval Real Estate Developments and Freedom’, American Historical Review 63

D. Maffei (1967). ‘Il giudice testimone e una “quaestio” di Jacques de Révigny (MS Bon. Coll. Hisp. 82)’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 35

L.E. Marshall (1979). ‘The Identity of the “New Man” in the Anticlaudianus of Alan of Lille’, Viator 10

R. McKeon (1938). ‘The Development of the Concept of Property in Political Philosophy: A Study of the Background of the Constitution’, Ethics 48

L.R. Ménager (1959). ‘L'institution monarchique dans les états normands d'ltalie’, Cahiers de Civilisation Médiévale 2: 303–31

S.F.C. Milsom (1976). The Legal Framework of English Feudalism (The Maitland Lecture, 1972), Cambridge University Press

K.F. Morrison (1964). The Two Kingdoms. Ecclesiology in Carolingian Political Thought, Princeton University Press

H.A. Myers (1971). ‘Kingship in “The Book of Emperors”’, Traditio 27: 205–30

D.M. Nicol (1976). ‘Kaisersalbung. The Unction of Emperors in Late Byzantine Coronation Ritual’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 2

R. Wenskus (1961). Stammesbildung und Verfassung. Das Werden der frühmittelalterlichen Gentes, Böhlau Verlag

Ch. Wirszubski (1950). Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate, Cambridge University Press

M. Wulf de (1920). ‘L'Individu et le Groupe dans la Scolastique du XIIIe Siècle’, Revue Néo-Scolasticue de Philosophie 22: 341–57