Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:35:28.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Roman law

from I - Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

P.G. Stein
Affiliation:
Regius Professor of Civil Law, University of Cambridge
J. H. Burns
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access

Summary

Knowledge of Roman law was transmitted to later ages through two main bodies of material, first the so-called barbarian codes, collections of materials made by Gothic and Burgundian kings at the beginning of the sixth century for application to their Roman subjects, and secondly, the Corpus luris of the Emperor Justinian, enacted in the 530s. Very few texts survived except by incorporation in these collections, and they did not become known until the sixteenth century or later. The legal material in the sixth-century collections is the product of a thousand years of legal development, and is in various forms, partly legislation and partly discussion by legal experts. It is concerned with private law, governing the relations between private individuals, rather than public law, governing the organs of the state, which was relatively undeveloped until the Byzantine period.

Technically Roman law reached its peak in the first two centuries AD, known as the classical period, but the seeds of the classical law can already be discerned in the tribal law of the small city state of the fifth century BC. On the establishment of the Republic in 509 BC, the law was a set of unwritten customary rules regarded as part of the way of life of the Roman people. Its application was confined to Roman citizens (ius civile, law for cives, citizens). In matters of doubt, the interpretation of the pontiffs, a body of patrician aristocrats, was decisive both as to the law and to the ritual forms for enforcing it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalders, G.J.D. (1969). ‘ΝΟΜΟΣ ΕΜΨϑΧΟΣ’, in Politeia und Respublica, Gedenkschrift R. Stark, Palingenesis 4: , Franz Steiner VerlagGoogle Scholar
Athanassiadi-Fowden, P. (1981). Julian and Hellenism, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Barker, E. (1955). From Alexander to Constantine, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T.D. (1981). Constantine and Eusebius, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Baynes, N.H. (1955) ‘Eusebius and the Christian Empire’, in Baynes, , 1955Google Scholar
Berkhof, H. (1947). Kirche und Kaiser. Eine Untersuchung der Entstiehung der byzantinischen und der theokratischen Staatsauffassung im vierten Jahrhundert, Evangelischer VerlagGoogle Scholar
Brown, P.R.L. (1982). Society and the Holy in Late Antiquity, Faber and FaberGoogle Scholar
Buckland, W.W. (1975). A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd edn, ed. Stein, P., Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Cadoux, C.J. (1925). The Early Church and the World, T. and T. ClarkGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, M.P. (1937). ‘The Virtues of a Roman Emperor. Propaganda as the Creation of Belief’, Proceedings of the British Academy 23Google Scholar
II. Codex, ed. Krüger, P., 13th edn, 1963Google Scholar
Combès, C. (1927). La doctrine politique de saint Augustin, Les petits fils de Plon et NourritGoogle Scholar
Crawford, M.H. (1978). The Roman Republic, Fontana/CollinsGoogle Scholar
Dagron, G. (1968). L'empire romain d'Orient au IVème siècle et les institutions politiques de l'hellénisme: le témoignage de Thémistion (Travaux et Mémoirs, Centre de Recherche d'Histoire et Civilisation Byzantines) 3: , Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique, ParisGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J.P. (1968). The Oracles of the Law, ch. 2 ‘The Heritage of Roman Law’, University of Michigan Law SchoolGoogle Scholar
Deane, H.A. (1963). The Political and Social Ideas of St Augustine, Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Dihle, A. (1973). ‘Zum Streit um den Altar der Viktoria’, in Humanitas und Christianitas. Festschrift Waszink, North-HollandGoogle Scholar
Duchrow, U. (1983). Christenheit und Weltverantwortung: Traditionsgeschichte und systematische Struktur der Zweireichslehre, 2nd edn, Klett-CottaGoogle Scholar
Dvornik, F. (1955). ‘The Emperor Julian's “Reactionary” Ideas on Kingship’, in Late Classical and Medieval Studies in Honor of A.M. Friend, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Dvornik, F. (1966). Early Christian and Byzantine Political Philosophy: Origin and Background, 2 vols. (Dumbarton Oaks Studies 9), Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine StudiesGoogle Scholar
Ehrhardt, A.A.T. (1959). Politische Metaphysik von Solon bis Augustin, J.C.B. MohrGoogle Scholar
Festugière, A.J. (1951). ‘Les inscriptions d'Asoka et l'ldéal du roi hellénistique’, Recherches de science religieuse 39Google Scholar
Goodenough, E.R. (1928). ‘The Political Philosophy of Hellenistic Kingship’, Yearbook of Classical Studies 1Google Scholar
Greenslade, S.L. (1954). Church and State from Constantine to Theodosius, SCM PressGoogle Scholar
Greeven, H. (1935). Das Hauptproblem der Socialethik in der neuen Stoa und in Urchristentum, C. BertelsmannGoogle Scholar
Gülzow, H. (1969). Christentum und Sklaverei, Rudolf HabeltGoogle Scholar
Hadot, P. (1971). ‘Fürstenspiegel’, Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 61Google Scholar
Harnack, A. (1924). Die mission und Ausbreitung des Christentums, 4th edn J.C. HinrichsGoogle Scholar
Hengel, M. (1974). Property and Riches in the Early Church, SCM Press; Porpoise PressGoogle Scholar
Honoré, T. (1978). Tribonian, DuckworthGoogle Scholar
I. Institutiones, ed. Krüger, P.; Digesta, ed. Mommsen, T. and Kreuger, P., 19th edn, 1966Google Scholar
Jones, C.P. (1971). Plutarch and Rome, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Jones, C.P. (1978). The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom, Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joolwicz, H.F. and Nicholson, B. (1972). Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, 3rd edn, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, E.H. (1952). ‘Kaiser Friedrich II und das Königsbild des Hellenismus’, in Varia Variorum. Festschrift für Karl Reinhardt, Böhlau VerlagGoogle Scholar
Karayannopoulos, J. (1956). ‘Der frühbyzantinischer Kaiser’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 49Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1972). Der Streit um den Viktoriaaltar (Texte und Forschung 7), Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar
Long, A.A. (1974). Hellenistic Philosophy, DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Morino, C. (1969). Church and State in the Teaching of St Ambrose, Catholic University of America PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, F.X. (1967). Politics and the Early Christian Church, Desclée; de BrouwerGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, B. (1962). Introduction to Roman Law, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
III. Novellae, ed. Schöll, R. and Kroll, G., 8th edn, 1963Google Scholar
Obolensky, D. (1971). The Byzantine Commonwealth. Eastern Europe, 500–1453, Weidenfeld and NicolsonGoogle Scholar
Palanque, J.R. (1933). S. Ambroise et l'empire romain, E. de BeccardGoogle Scholar
Peterson, E. (1935). Der Monotheismus als politisches Problem, Jakob Regner; repr. in Peterson, E. (1961). Theologische Traktate, Kösel-VerlagGoogle Scholar
Schubart, W. (1937). ‘Das hellenistische Königsideal nach Inschriften und Papyri’, Archiv für Papyrusforschung 12Google Scholar
Setton, K.M. (1941). Christian Attitudes towards the Emperor in the Fourth Century, Columbia University Press; P.S. King and SonGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, T.A. (1951). A History of Greek Political Thought, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Ste Croix, G.E.M. (1981). The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World, DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Stein, P. (1968). Regulae iuris: From Juristic Rules to Legal Maxims, Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
Steinwenter, A. (1946). ‘ΝΝ Ο Μ Γ ΕΜΘϒΟΓ Zur Geschichte einer politischen Theorie’, Anzeiger der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, philosoph.-historische Klasse, 83:.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H., ed. (1965). The Pythagorean Texts, Acta Academiae Aboensis 30.1Google Scholar
Walbank, F.W. (1957). A Historical Commentary on Polyhius I, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. (1971). ‘The Natural Law and Stoicism’, in Long, A.A. (ed.) Problems in Stoicism, Athlone PressGoogle Scholar
Wirszubski, Ch. (1950). Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Roman law
    • By P.G. Stein, Regius Professor of Civil Law, University of Cambridge
  • Edited by J. H. Burns, University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Roman law
    • By P.G. Stein, Regius Professor of Civil Law, University of Cambridge
  • Edited by J. H. Burns, University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Roman law
    • By P.G. Stein, Regius Professor of Civil Law, University of Cambridge
  • Edited by J. H. Burns, University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521243247.005
Available formats
×