Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:28:30.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Central government

from Part V - Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Dominic Lieven
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A study of the central government of the Russian Empire sheds light on three important issues in the imperial era. How well did the institutions handle the challenge of modernisation from above? How did the autocracy’s and bureaucracy’s view of their respective roles in society change over time? What were the major challenges related to effective governance from the centre and how did the monarchy and bureaucracy handle them? By extension a solid understanding of the workings of central government helps to determine the extent to which it and its personnel held responsibility for the collapse of the Romanov regime.

Peter the Great’s reform of the central government marked the beginning of the imperial bureaucracy’s evolution on two different but equally important and mutually linked levels. The ministerial bureaucracy from the early nineteenth century staffed the so-called subordinate organs (podchinennye organy), which at least theoretically handled activities in a designated field, such as finance or foreign affairs. The supreme organs (verkhovnye organy) had the responsibility to manage and co-ordinate the activities of the subordinate organs. The effectiveness of government depended on cadres at least as much as institutions. Indeed, Konstantin Pobedonostsev, well-known conservative and tutor to the last two emperors, Alexander III and Nicholas II, frequently stressed, ‘Institutions are of no importance. Everything depends on individuals.’ Whilst his categorical rejection of the role of institutions is highly debatable, we do need to take into account the dynamic between institutions and human agents, the most important of whom was the emperor, in order to obtain a more coherent understanding of how the central organs actually functioned.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ananich, B. V., and Ganelin, R. Sh., Sergei Iulevich Vitte i ego vremia (St Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin, 1999).
Baklanova, E. N., Krest’ianskii dvor i obshchina na russkom severe: konets XVII-nachalo XVIII v. (Moscow: Nauka, 1976).
Beller, S., Francis Joseph (Harlow: Longman, 1995).
Bled, J.-P., Franz Joseph (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).
Burns, J. McGregor, Leadership (New York: Harper and Row, 1977).
Chustiakov, O. (ed.), Gosudarstvennii stroiRossiiskoi Imperii nakanune krusheniia (Moscow: Izd.MGU, 1995).
Clark, C., Kaiser Wilhelm II (Harlow: Longman, 2000).
Dan, F. I., The Origins of Bolshevism, trans Carmichael, J. (New York: Secker and Warburg, 1964).
Deon, M. (ed.), LouisXIVpar lui-même. (Paris: Gallimard, 1991).
Dukes, P., The Making of Russian Absolutism 1613–1801 (Longman: London, 1982).
Dull, J., ‘The Evolution of Government in China’, in Ropp, P. (ed.), The Heritage of China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).
Eklof, B., Bushnell, J., and Zakharova, L. (eds.), Russia’s Great Reforms 1855–1881 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994).
Emmons, T., and Vucinich, W. (eds.), The Zemstvo in Russia: An Experiment in Local Self-Government (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
Frank, S. P., Crime, Cultural Conflict, and Justice in Rural Russia, 1856–1914 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999).
Galai, S., The Liberation Movement in Russia, 1900–1905 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).
Ganelin, S. N., Rossiiskoe Samoderzhavie v 1905 gody (Leningrad: Nauka, 1991).
Hamm, M. (ed.), The City in Late Imperial Russia (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986).
Hamm, M., Kiev: A Portrait, 1800–1917 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).
Hartley, J., A Social History of the Russian Empire (London: Longman, 1999).
Hartley, J., Alexander I (Harlow: Longman, 1994).
Hatton, R., Louis XIV and Absolutism (London: Macmillan, 1976).
Huang, R., 1587. A Year of No Significance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981).
Hucker, C., ‘Ming government’, in Twitchett, D. and Mote, F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of China, vol. VIII, Part 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Hughes, L., Russia in the Age of Peter the Great (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998).
Jones, R. E., The Emancipation of the Russian Nobility 1762–1785 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973).
Kokovtsev, V., Iz moego proshlego (Paris: priv. pub., 1933).
LeDonne, J., Ruling Russia: Politics and Administration in the Age of Absolutism, 1762–1796 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).
Lieven, D., Nicholas II: Emperor of all the Russias (London: John Murray, 1993).
Lieven, D., ‘The Russian Civil Service under Nicholas II: Some Variations on the Bureaucratic Theme’, Russia’s Rulers under the Old Regime (London: Yale University Press, 1989).
Lincoln, S. N., Nicholas I: Autocrat of All the Russias (London: University of Indiana Press, 1977).
Lobanov-Rostovsky, A., Russia and Asia (Ann Arbor: George Wahr, 1951).
Macdonald, D., United Government and Foreign Policy in Russia, 1900–1914 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992).
Makarov, S., Sovet ministrov Rossiiskoi imperii, 1857–1917 (St Petersburg: Izd. SPbU, 2000).
McConnell, A., ‘Catherine the Great and the Fine Arts’, in Mendelsohn, E. (ed.), Imperial Russia 1700–1917: Essays in Honour of Marc Raeff (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
McKean, R., The Russian Constitutional Monarchy, 1907–1917 (London: Macmillan, 1977).
Mironenko, S., Samoderzhavie i reformy: politicheskaia bor’ba v Rossii v nachale XIX v. (Moscow: Nauka, 1989).
Mironov, G., Istoriia gosudarstva rossiiskogo XIX vek (Moscow: Nauka, 1995).
Mosse, W., ‘Russian Bureaucracy at the end of the Ancien Regime: The Imperial State Council’, SR (1980).
Okenfuss, Max, ‘The Jesuit Origins of Petrine Education’, in Garrard, J. (ed.), The Eighteenth Century in Russia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).
Orlovsky, S. N., The Limits of Reform: TheMinistry of Internal Affairs in Imperial Russia, 1802–1 881 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982).
Pintner, W., and Rowney, D. (eds.), Russian Officialdom: The Bureaucratisation of Russian Society from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century (London: Macmillan, 1980).
Raeff, M., ‘The Bureaucratic Phenomena of Imperial Russia’, AHR 84 (1979).
Robbins, R., The Tsar’s Viceroys: Russian Provincial Governors in the Last Years of Empire (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987).
Rohl, J. C. G., The Kaiser and his Court: Wilhelm II and the Government of Germany (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1987).
Shilov, S. N., Gosudarstvennie deiateli Rossiliskoi Imperii, 1802–1917 (St Petersburg: European University Press, 2003).
Spence, J., The Search forModern China (NewYork: Norton, 1990).
Starr, S. F., Decentralisation and Self-Government in Russia. 1830–70 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972).
Turgeva, A., Vysshie organi gosudarstvennoi vlasti iupravleniia Rossii IX–XX vv. (Moscow: S-ZAGS, 2000).
Verner, A., The Crisis of Russian Autocracy: Nicholas II and the 1905 Revolution (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990).
Viskochov, S. N., Imperator Nikolai I (St Petersburg: Izd. SPbU, 2003).
Whelan, H., Alexander III and the State Council: Bureaucracy and Counterreform in Late Imperial Russia (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1982).
Wortman, R. S., Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy, 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995 and 2000).
Yaney, G., The Systematization of Russian Government: Social Evolution in the Domestic Administration of Imperial Russia (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1973).
Zaionchkovskii, P. A. (ed.), Dnevnik gosudarstvennogo sekretaria A.A. Polovtsova, 2 vols. (Moscow: Nauka, 1966) vol. I.
Zaionchkovskii, S. N., Pravitel’stvennii apparat samoderzhavnoi Rossii v XIX v. (Moscow: Nauka, 1977).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Central government
  • Edited by Dominic Lieven, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Russia
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521815291.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Central government
  • Edited by Dominic Lieven, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Russia
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521815291.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Central government
  • Edited by Dominic Lieven, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Russia
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521815291.022
Available formats
×