Skip to main content
×
×
Home
Tides of Consent
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 179
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Collins, Timothy P. 2018. Hypocrisy in American Political Attitudes. p. 57.

    Arndt, Christoph 2018. An Empirical Model of Issue Evolution and Partisan Realignment in a Multiparty System. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 71, Issue. 1, p. 59.

    Hare, Christopher and Poole, Keith T. 2018. The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing. p. 901.

    Hare, Christopher Liu, Tzu-Ping and Lupton, Robert N. 2018. What Ordered Optimal Classification reveals about ideological structure, cleavages, and polarization in the American mass public. Public Choice,

    Shafi, Ashik and Vultee, Fred 2018. Media Influence. p. 24.

    Waggoner, Philip D. 2018. Do Constituents Influence Issue-Specific Bill Sponsorship?. American Politics Research, p. 1532673X1875964.

    Collins, Timothy P. 2018. Hypocrisy in American Political Attitudes. p. 159.

    Park, Barum 2018. How Are We Apart? Continuity and Change in the Structure of Ideological Disagreement in the American Public, 1980–2012. Social Forces, Vol. 96, Issue. 4, p. 1757.

    McGinty, Emma E. Goldman, Howard H. Pescosolido, Bernice A. and Barry, Colleen L. 2018. Communicating about Mental Illness and Violence: Balancing Stigma and Increased Support for Services. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 185.

    Cole, Alistair Fox, Stuart Pasquier, Romain and Stafford, Ian 2018. Political trust in France’s multi-level government. Journal of Trust Research, p. 1.

    Balentine, Matthew D. and Webster, Gerald R. 2018. The Changing Electoral Landscape of the Western United States. The Professional Geographer, p. 1.

    Collins, Timothy P. 2018. Hypocrisy in American Political Attitudes. p. 17.

    Somer-Topcu, Zeynep 2017. Agree or disagree. Party Politics, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 66.

    Dusso, Aaron 2017. Personality and the Challenges of Democratic Governance. p. 39.

    Andonie, Costel and Diermeier, Daniel 2017. Path-dependency and coordination in multi-candidate elections with behavioral voters. Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 29, Issue. 4, p. 520.

    Dusso, Aaron 2017. Personality and the Challenges of Democratic Governance. p. 109.

    Feinberg, Matthew Tullett, Alexa M. Mensch, Zachary Hart, William Gottlieb, Sara and Eriksson, Kimmo 2017. The political reference point: How geography shapes political identity. PLOS ONE, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. e0171497.

    Lehmann, Peter S. and Pickett, Justin T. 2017. Experience Versus Expectation: Economic Insecurity, the Great Recession, and Support for the Death Penalty. Justice Quarterly, Vol. 34, Issue. 5, p. 873.

    Jaeger, William P. Lyons, Jeffrey and Wolak, Jennifer 2017. Political Knowledge and Policy Representation in the States. American Politics Research, Vol. 45, Issue. 6, p. 907.

    Brown, Elizabeth K Socia, Kelly M and Silver, Jasmine R 2017. Conflicted conservatives, punitive views, and anti-Black racial bias 1974–2014. Punishment & Society, p. 146247451773629.

    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Tides of Consent
    • Online ISBN: 9780511791024
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791024
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Politics is a trial in which those in government - and those who aspire to be - make proposals, debate alternatives, and pass laws. Then the jury of public opinion decides. It likes the proposals or actions or it does not. It trusts the actors or it doesn't. It moves, always at the margin, and then those who benefit from the movement are declared winners. This book is about that public opinion response. Its most basic premise is that although pubic opinion rarely matters in a democracy, public opinion change is the exception. Public opinion rarely matters, because the public rarely cares enough to act on its concerns or preferences. Change happens only when the threshold of normal public inattention is crossed. When public opinion changes, governments rise or fall, elections are won or lost, old realities give way to new demands.

Reviews

‘This is excellent work by a scholar who is, by all measures, top in his field. Stimson writes about the single most important element in American politics: public opinion. He traces movement in public opinion over time and shows that it moves politics.’

Janet Box-Steffensmeier - Ohio State University

‘Tides of Consent is an ambitious attempt to integrate the findings of a half-century of public opinion research in an effort to draw convincing conclusions about the political implications and electoral consequences of public opinion. Too often public opinion is presented as filler, a spot on the evening news when nothing else is available.Rarely do we look at public opinion in its contemporary context and almost never do we attempt to understand its significance over the long haul. In this book, Stimson offers us new insights into public preferences and understanding of the links between public preferences and public policy that are often lost in coverage of the daily news or the political campaign.’

John McIver - University of Colorado

‘James Stimson has written a very important - and very readable - book. In a world of erratic sound bites, Stimson's analysis provides the underlying coherence of a symphony. Anyone who wishes to better understand the ebb and flow of American politics should read Tides of Consent.’

Richard J. Tofel

'The book is well written and a rare example of successful integration of state-of-the-art research and passing on knowledge to a wider audience … the book could be used as a benchmark for comparative research exploring the evolution in public opinion and the effects of campaigns and debates in other institutional settings … an excellent book, which deserves to be widely read.'

Source: Political Studies Review

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 202 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 501 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.