Skip to main content
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: November 2017

2 - The WTO and the Changing State of the Global Economy

from PART I - WTO Accessions and the New Trade Multilateralism


The world economy is showing signs of recovery after several years of lacklustre performance, although major policy uncertainties may easily upset this fragile trend. To jumpstart economies and trade after the financial crisis of 2008–9, governments across the world employed a traditional mix of fiscal, monetary and structural policies. These efforts helped to prevent a deeper crisis but fell short of pulling the world out of a period of stagnation in 2012–16. Trade, in particular, slowed relative to its historical performance and to overall economic growth. Meanwhile, political and social pressures have led to inward-looking policies in large countries. Other challenges – from civil and military conflicts to scattered terrorism – have also contributed to this inward turn. Against this background, this chapter discusses the need for a new and more flexible global economic architecture. It would require reforms at all levels, starting with revamping the structural foundations for growth and trade, applying solid, ground-level macroeconomic policies in individual countries, and rebuilding the upper floors of multilateral cooperation, i.e. upgrading it and making it more adaptable and responsive to the requirements of the twenty-first century. In the trade area, key pillars to support this structure include innovative mechanisms of trade liberalization in both new and traditional areas, increased inclusiveness of trade, recognition and financing of adjustment costs, effective communication on trade, a redefined role and functions for the WTO, upgraded multilateral rules and strong leadership. With radical changes needed, WTO accessions have already contributed, and could contribute even more, to each of these pillars.

For several years since the global financial crisis, the global economy has managed to avoid another systemic crisis and has been recovering gradually. However, growth has been low for so long that most people and businesses simply have not yet noticed that the economy was actually recovering. Weak economic growth, stagnant wages, high unemployment, and rising income inequality have stimulated support for inward-looking policies. Recovery has been sluggish and fragile, and its durability continues to be at risk. Recently some advanced economies have seen their GDP expand faster than expected, supported by a cyclical upturn in global manufacturing and trade. But at the same time, several emerging and advanced economies are still operating below capacity, and underlying core inflation is still low generally.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Trade Multilateralism in the Twenty-First Century
  • Online ISBN: 9781108367745
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
Ahn, J., Dabla-Norris, E., Duval, R. A., Hu, B. and Njie, L. (2016). ‘Reassessing the Productivity Gains from Trade Liberalization’, IMF Working Paper, 16/77. Retrieved from
Constantinescu, C., Mattoo, A. and Ruta, M. (2015). ‘The Global Trade Slowdown: Cyclical or Structural?’, IMF Working Paper, 15/6. Retrieved from
Dadush, U. and Osakwe, C. (eds.) (2015). WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty. WTO, Cambridge University Press.
European Union (EU) (2016). Trade Means Jobs. Retrieved from
Ganelli, G. and Tervala, J. (2015). ‘Value of WTO Trade Agreements in a New Keynesian Model’, Journal of Macroeconomics, 45: 347–62.
Hoekman, B. (ed.) (2015). The Global Trade Slowdown: A New Normal? London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. Retrieved from
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2013). ‘Jobs and Growth: Analytical and Operational Considerations for the Fund’, IMF Policy Paper. Retrieved from
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2015a). ‘Making Public Investment More Efficient’, IMF Policy Paper. Retrieved from
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2015b). ‘Review of the Role of Trade in the Work of the Fund’, IMF Policy Paper. Retrieved from
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2016). “Global Trade: What is behind the Slowdown?”, Chapter 2 of the IMF World Economic Outlook, October 2016.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2016a). ‘Too Slow for Too Long’, World Economic Outlook. Retrieved from; database retrieved from
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2016b). ‘Acting Now, Acting Together’, Fiscal Monitor. Retrieved from
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2016c). World Economic Outlook Database, October. Retrieved from
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2017a). Group of Twenty IMF Note – Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors’ Meetings: IMF Note on Global Prospects and Policy Challenges, 17–18 March. Retrieved from
IMF/World Bank/WTO (2017). “Making Trade an Engine of Growth for All: The Case for Trade.” IMF Policy Paper, Prepared by Staff of the IMF, the World Bank Group, and the World Trade Organization, April 10, Retrieved from
IMF (2017b). Note on Global Prospects and Policy Challenges. Group of Twenty IMF Note — G-20 Leaders’ Summit. Retrieved from
Kireyev, A. (2015). ‘The Macroeconomic Implications of WTO Accession’, in Dadush, U. and Osakwe, C. (eds.), WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty. WTO, Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–60.
Kireyev, A. (2016). ‘WTO Accession Reforms and Competitiveness: Lessons for Africa’, in Low, P., Osakwe, C. and Oshikawa, M. (eds.), African Perspectives on Trade and the WTO: Domestic Reforms, Structural Transformation and Global Economic Integration. WTO, Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–115.
Kireyev, A. and Leonidov, A. (2016). ‘China's Imports Slowdown: Spillovers, Spillins, and Spillbacks’, IMF Working Paper, 16/51. Retrieved from
Kpodar, K. and Imam, P. A. (2015). ‘Does a Regional Trade Agreement Lessen or Exacerbate Growth Volatility? An Empirical Investigation’, IMF Working Paper, 15/177. Retrieved from
Lipton, D. (2016). Can Globalization Still Deliver? Stavros Niarchos Lecture, Peterson Institute for International Economics. Retrieved from
Oxfam (2016). An Economy for the 1%: How Privilege and Power in the Economy Drive Extreme Inequality and How This Can Be Stopped. Retrieved from
WTO (1999). The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts. WTO, Cambridge University Press.
WTO (2015). Reports on Recent Trade Developments, 9 December. Retrieved from