Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: August 2014

6 - Transforming U.S. Energy Innovation: How Do We Get There?

Summary

As we argued in Chapter 1, the United States and the world need a radical acceleration in the rate of energy technology innovation to meet the profound economic, environmental, and national security challenges that energy poses in the 21st century. If the U.S. government does not act now to improve the conditions for innovation in energy, even in times of budget stringency, it risks losing leadership in one of the key global industries of the future, and the world risks being unable to safely mitigate climate change and to reduce vulnerability to disruptions and conflicts – both domestic and international. Waiting is not an option.

The previous chapters of this book have laid out a broad agenda of policy changes that could help cause such a transformation in U.S. energy innovation. We believe that implementing these recommendations would bring the United States much closer to meeting the CASCADES criteria for an effective energy technology innovation strategy that we laid out in Chapter 1 – an approach that is comprehensive, adaptable, sustainable, agile, diversified, equitable, and strategic. In this chapter, we summarize the recommendations of the previous chapters, build on crosscutting themes that run through them all, and offer a preliminary discussion of the steps that would be needed to put the United States on the trajectory we suggest.

A Major Expansion in Energy Technology Innovation Investments, with More Stability and Better Targeting

As discussed in Chapter 2, the U.S. government should improve its approach to making decisions about energy RD&D investments in different technology areas. We have developed an approach to support these decisions and concluded that dramatically expanding the Department of Energy (DOE)'s investment in energy research, development, and demonstration (RD&D), focused on a broad portfolio of different energy technologies and stages of innovation, is justified by the expected social benefits.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Transforming US Energy Innovation
  • Online ISBN: 9781107338890
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338890
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
L.D. Anadon (2012). “Missions-oriented RD&D institutions in energy between 2000 and 2010: A comparative analysis of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States.” Research Policy, 41(10):1742–56.

M.J. Barradale (2010). “Impact of public policy uncertainty on renewable energy investment: Wind power and the production tax credit.” Energy Policy, 38:7698–709.

W.B. Bonvillian , & R. Van Atta (2011). “ARPA-E and DARPA: Applying the DARPA model to energy innovation.” Journal of Technology Transfer, 36:469–513.

H. Choi , & L.D. Anadon (2014). “The role of the complementary sector and its relationship with network formation and government policies in emerging sectors: The case of solar photovoltaics between 2001 and 2009.” Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 82:80–94.

J. Hoppmann , M. Peters , M. Schneider , & V.H. Hoffmann (2013). “The two faces of market support – how deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry.” Research Policy, 42(4):989–1003.

G.F. Nemet (2009). “Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies.” Energy Policy, 37(3):825–35.

Q. Zhi , S. Jun , R. Peng , & L.D. Anadon (2013, October). “The evolution of China's National Energy RD&D programs: The role of scientists in science and technology decision making.” Energy Policy, 61:1568–85.