Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:42:55.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The Future at Work: Labor-Market Realities and the Transition to Adulthood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2009

Ingrid Schoon
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
Rainer K. Silbereisen
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Young people making the transition from school to work in the twenty-first century in the United States and other developed economies can be expected to face a very different world of work than their parents' generation. Consider, for example, the U.S. economy in the 1970s. During that decade, the “pig in the python” baby-boom cohort was having its peak growth effect on the size of the labor force, while Richard Freeman chronicled “the over-educated American” and the falling returns to a college education (Freeman, 1976; Toossi, 2006). Stocks of computer equipment and peripherals had only recently appeared in data produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis and, by the end of the 1970s, would not even reach one percent of the level that would be attained by the turn of the century. The microprocessor, invented in 1971, would eventually lead to the information age but in the 1970s, the economy was still driven by technologies of the industrial age. To the extent that the U.S. economy was affected by trade, it was still below the level – as a share of the economy – reached on the eve of World War I (Karoly & Panis, 2004). Thus, globalization was not in the vocabulary of the typical American worker.

Fast-forward to the turn of the twenty-first century and the picture is substantially different. Again, using the example of the United States, the demographic reality of slower population growth and population aging means a workforce that will grow more slowly than in the past.

Type
Chapter
Information
Transitions from School to Work
Globalization, Individualization, and Patterns of Diversity
, pp. 352 - 384
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. (2003). Cross-county inequality trends. Economic Journal, 113(485), 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlstrand, A. L., Bassi, L. J., & McMurrer, D. P. (2003). Workplace education for low-wage workers. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, D. H. (2001). Wiring the labor market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainard, L., & Litan, R. E. (2004). Offshoring service jobs: Bane or boon and what to do? Brookings Institution Policy Brief No. 132. Available online at www.brookings.edu/comm/policybriefs/pb132.htm.
Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Technology, organization, and the demand for skilled labor. In Blair, M. M. & Kochan, T. A. (Eds.), The new relationship: Human capital in the American corporation (pp. 145–184). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2005a). Contingent and alternative employment arrangements. BLS News Release, July 27, 2005.
,Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2005b). Work at home summary. BLS News Release, September 22, 2005.
Burtless, G., Lawrence, R. Z., Litan, R. E., & Shapiro, R. J. (1998). Globaphobia: Confronting fears about open trade. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
,Congressional Budget Office (CBO). (2002). The role of computer technology in the growth of productivity. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.Google Scholar
Day, J. C., & Bauman, K. J. (2000). Have we reached the top? Educational attainment projections of the U.S. population. Working Paper Series No. 43, Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
Dome, A., & Shniper, L. (2007). Occupational employment projections to 2016. Monthly Labor Review, 130(11), 86–125.Google Scholar
Ellwood, D. (2001). The sputtering labor force of the 21st century: Can social policy help? Working Paper No. 8321. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, R. C. (1998). Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (1997). Institutional changes and rising wage inequality: Is there a linkage?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. B. (1976). The over-educated American. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. B. (2002). The labour market in the new information economy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(3), 288–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. B., & Katz, L. (1994). Rising wage inequality: The United States vs. Other Advanced Countries. In Freeman, R. B. (Ed.), Working under different rules (pp. 29–62). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. B., & Katz, L. (Eds.). (1995). Differences and changes in wage structures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Gottschalk, P., & Joyce, M. (1998). Cross-national differences in the rise in earnings inequality: Market and institutional factors. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipple, S., & Kosanovich, K. (2003). Computer and Internet use at work in 2001. Monthly Labor Review, 126(2), 26–35.Google Scholar
Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K. M. (2001). The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics, 54(1), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karoly, L. A. (2007). Forces shaping the future U.S. workforce and workplace. Testimony for the hearing on Strengthening America's Middle Class before the Committee on Education and Labor, U.S. House of Representatives, February 7, 2007. Reprinted as CT-273, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Karoly, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2004). The 21st century at work: Forces shaping the future workforce and workplace in the United States. MG-164, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karoly, L. A., & Panis, C.W.A. (2009). Supply of and demand for skilled labor in the United States. In Bhagwati, J. & Hanson, G. (Eds.), Skilled immigration today: Prospects, problems and policies, (pp. 15–52). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kletzer, L. G. (1998). Job displacement. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1), 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kletzer, L. G. (2000). Trade and job loss in U.S. manufacturing, 1979–94. In Feenstra, R. C. (Ed.), The impact of international trade on wages, (pp. 349–396). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kletzer, L. G. (2002). Imports, exports, and jobs. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1995). Growing world trade: Causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995(1), 327–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, D., & Blasi, J. (1998). The new employee–employer relationship. Paper prepared for the Aspen Institute Domestic Strategy Group. Available online at www.aspeninstitute.org/Programt2.asp?bid=870.
Malone, T. (2005). Best of both worlds? A view of the changing workplace. RAND Review, 25(3), 8–9.Google Scholar
Malone, T. W. (2004). The future of work: How the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style and your life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Malone, T. W., & Laubacher, R. J. (1998). The dawn of the e-lance economy, Harvard Business Review, September–October 1998, 145–152.Google ScholarPubMed
Mann, C. L. (2005). Offshore outsourcing and the globalization of U.S. services: Why now, how important, and what policy implications. In Bergsten, C. Fred and the Institute for International Economics, The United States and the world economy: Foreign economic policy for the next decade (pp. 281–311).Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Allegretto, S. (2007). The state of working America 2006/2007. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
,National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). (2005). The National Nanotechnology Initiative at Five Years: Assessment and Recommendations of the National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. May 2005. Available online at www.nano.gov/final_pcast_nano_report.pdf.Google Scholar
,National Science Foundation (NSF). (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, March 2001.Google Scholar
Nickell, S., & Bell, B. (1996). The collapse in demand for the unskilled and unemployment across the OECD. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 11, 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2000). Literacy in the information age: Final report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2007). Science competencies for tomorrow's world, Volumes I and II. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Reich, R. B. (2001). The future of success. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Scarpetta, S., Bassanini, A., Pilat, D., & Schreyer, P. (2000). Economic growth in the OECD area: Recent trends at the aggregate and sectoral level. Working Paper No. 248, OECD Economics Department.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, H., & Maisonneuve, C. (2007). The wage premium on tertiary education: New estimates for 21 OECD countries. OECD Working Paper No. 589, December 2007. Available online at www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2007doc.nsf/linkto/eco-wkp(2007)49.CrossRef
Toossi, M. (2006). A new look at long-term labor force projections to 2050. Monthly Labor Review, 129(11), 19–39.Google Scholar
,U.S. Department of Commerce. (2001). U.S. jobs from exports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, February 2001.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×