Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables and Figures
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Introduction: Korea and the Great Powers in a Changing World
- Chapter 2 China and the Two Koreas
- Chapter 3 Russia and the Two Koreas
- Chapter 4 Japan and the Two Koreas
- Chapter 5 The United States and the Two Koreas
- Chapter 6 The Future of the Two Koreas
- References
- Index
- References
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables and Figures
- Preface
- Chapter 1 Introduction: Korea and the Great Powers in a Changing World
- Chapter 2 China and the Two Koreas
- Chapter 3 Russia and the Two Koreas
- Chapter 4 Japan and the Two Koreas
- Chapter 5 The United States and the Two Koreas
- Chapter 6 The Future of the Two Koreas
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Two Koreas and the Great Powers , pp. 361 - 394Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
(2003/04) “Will Asia's Past Be Its Future?” International Security, 28(3), 149–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1950) “Crisis in Asia: An Examination of United States Policy,” Department of State Bulletin, January 23, pp. 111–18. (Originally delivered on January 12, 1950 at the National Press Club.)Google Scholar
(2004) “ROK-Russia Summit to Boost Railway Link Project,” The Korea Times, September 21Google Scholar
Akaha, Tsuneo (2002) “Japan's Policy Toward North Korea: Interests and Options,” in , ed., The Future of North Korea, New York: Routledge, pp. 77–94Google Scholar
(1998) “Introduction,” in , ed. Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–24Google Scholar
Alagappa, Muthiah (2003) “Preface,” in , ed. Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. ⅸ–ⅹⅴGoogle Scholar
and (1977) “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics,” World Politics, 29(4), 489–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984) “The Decision to Ally: A Theory and Test,” Western Political Quarterly, 37(4), 523–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1913) The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to Their Economic and Social Advantage, 4th ed., New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
and (2001) “Japan and the Unification of Korea: Challenges for U.S. Policy Coordination,” in Nicholas Eberstadt and , eds., Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 125–63Google Scholar
Armstrong, Charles K. (1998) “‘A Socialism of Our Style’: North Korean Ideology in a Post-Communist Era,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–53Google Scholar
Armstrong, Charles K. (2001) “The Nature, Origins, and Development of the North Korean State,” in , ed., The North Korean System in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Palgrave, pp. 39–63Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (2006) Korea at the Center: Dynamics of Regionalism in Northeast Asia, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
(2001) “How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict,” International Security, 26(1), 93–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) “Upping the Ante for Kim Jong Il: Pentagon Plan 5030, A New Blueprint for Facing Down North Korea,” U.S. News & World Report, July 21, p. 21.Google Scholar
(2002) American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) “Assessing the Politics of the Korean War, 1949–51,” Bulletin of Cold War International History Project, 5.Google Scholar
(1979) “Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends Versus Old Tendencies,” World Politics, 31, 161–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) Jihad vs. McWorld: How the Planet is Both Falling Apart and Coming Together and What This Means for Democracy, New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
(1996) Contemporary American Relations with North Korea: 1987–1994, PhD dissertation, Woodrow Wilson Department of Government and Foreign Affairs, University of Virginia, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
(1971) “The External Relations of Small States,” in August Schou and Arne Olav Bruntland, eds., Small States in International Relations, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell, pp. 39–56Google Scholar
Bazhanov, Evgeny P. (2000a) “Russia's Policies Toward the Two Koreas,” in , ed., The Two Koreas and the United States, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 147–65Google Scholar
(2000b) “Russian Views of the Agreed Framework and the Four-Party Talks,” in James Clay Moltz and , eds., The North Korean Nuclear Program: Security, Strategy and New Perspectives from Russia, New York: Routledge, pp. 219–35Google Scholar
(2006) “Korea in Russia's Post Cold War Regional Political Context,” in , Gilbert Rozman, , and Stephen Kotkin, eds., Korea at the Center: Dynamics of Regionalism in Northeast Asia, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 214–26Google Scholar
and (1994) “The Evolution of Russian-Korean Relations,” Asian Survey, 34(9), 789–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “Sino-Korean Relations: Triangle of Tension, or Balancing a Divided Peninsula?” International Journal, 50, 516–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1977) Constructing Alternative World Futures: Reordering the Planet, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.Google Scholar
. (1993) “From Sword to Chrysanthemum: Japan's Culture of Anti-Militarism,” International Security, 17(4), 119–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Set for Stability? Prospects for Conflict and Cooperation in East Asia,” Review of International Studies, 26(3), 405–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “The Construction of Antagonism: The History Problem in Japan's Foreign Relations,” in and , eds. Reinventing the Alliance: US-Japan Security Partnership in an Era of Change, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63–88.Google Scholar
Berger, Thomas U. (2004) “Japan's International Relations: The Political and Security Dimensions,” in , ed., The International Relations of Northeast Asia, Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 135–69.Google Scholar
(2005a) “The Politics of Memory in Japanese Foreign Relations,” Unpublished manuscript, Department of International Relations, Boston University, Boston
(2005b) “Of Shrines and Hooligans: The Structure of the History Problem in East Asia after 9/11,” Unpublished manuscript, Department of International Relations, Boston University, Boston
(1993/94) “Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States After the Cold War,” International Security, 18(3), 34–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) “China-Russia Relations: Presidential Politicking and Proactive Posturing,” Comparative Connections [Online], 6(1), 125–36. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0401q.pdf.Google Scholar
., eds. (1971) Crises and Sequences in Political Development, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) “Identity, Difference, and the Dilemmas of Inter-Korean Relations: Insights from Northern Defectors and the German Precedent,” Asian Perspective, 28(2), 35–63.Google Scholar
(2005) Divided Korea: Toward a Culture of Reconciliation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Japan and Korea in the 1990s: From Antagonism to Adjustment, Bookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
and (2000/01) “Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for Ideas,” International Security, 25(3), 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
and (1992) War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) “A Long-Term Strategy for North Korea,” Japan Focus [Online], February 15. Available at http://japanfocus.org/article.asp?id=222.Google Scholar
and (1994) Critical Mass: The Dangerous Race for Superweapons in a Fragmenting World, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
(1994) The Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
(1991) People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd ed., Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
(1999) The Guerilla Dynasty: Politics and Leadership in North Korea, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
, ed. (1996) Zhongguo da zhanlue: lingdao shijie da lantu [China's Grand Strategy: A Blueprint for World Leadership], Haikou, China: Hainan chubanshe.Google Scholar
(1989) “The North Pacific Triangle: Sources of Economic and Political Transformation,” Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, 8, 3–17.Google Scholar
(1958) The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
and (1999) Preventive Defense: A New Security Strategy for America, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
(1997) “Korean Unification: The Zero-Sum Past and the Precarious Future,” Asian Perspective, 21(3), 63–92.Google Scholar
(1999a) Alignment Despite Antagonism: The United States-Korea-Japan Security Triangle, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999b) “Engaging China: Seoul-Beijing Détente and Korean Security,” Survival, 41, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a) “Japan's Grand Strategy on the Korean Peninsula: Optimistic Realism,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, 1(2), 249–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) “The Security Domain of South Korea's Globalization,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 217–41Google Scholar
(2001a) “Japan-Korea Relations: Ending 2000 with a Whimper, Not a Bang,” Comparative Connections [Online], 2(4), 88–93. Available at www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0401q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2001b) “Japan-Korea Relations: History Haunts, Engagement Dilemmas” Comparative Connections [Online], 3(1), 104–12. Available at www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0101q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2001c) “Japan–Korea Relations: Quicksand,” Comparative Connections [Online], 3(3): 101–07. Available at www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0103q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2003) “South Korea: Anchored or Adrift?” in Richard J. Ellings and , eds. Strategic Asia 2003–04: Fragility and Crisis, Seattle: The National Bureau of Asian Research, pp. 109–30Google Scholar
and (2003) Nuclear North Korea: A Debate on Engagement Strategies, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Imperial America and the Common Interest,” World Policy Journal, Spring, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War Ⅱ, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
(1993) “Beijing's Policy Toward Korea and PRC-ROK Normalization of Relations,” in Manwoo Lee and , eds., The Changing Order in Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula, Seoul: The Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University, pp. 155–72Google Scholar
(1974) “Russian Designs on the Far East,” in , ed., Russian Imperialism from Ivan the Great to the Revolution, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
(1993a) “The Role of the Great Powers in the Process of Korean Reunification,” in , ed., Korean Unification: Implications for Northeast Asia, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, pp. 59–79Google Scholar
(1993b) “New Approaches in China's Foreign Policy: The Post-Cold War Era,” Asian Survey, 33(3), 237–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (2004) Global Views 2004: Comparing South Korean and American Public Opinion and Foreign Policy, Chicago: Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
(1967) Korea in World Politics 1940–1950: An Evaluation of American Responsibility, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1992) “Threats, Assurances, and the Last Chance for Peace: The Lessons of Mao's Korean War Telegrams,” International Security, 17(1), 122–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) “Posing Problems Without Catching Up: China's Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy,” International Security, 25(4), 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1999) Russia and Asia: The Emerging Security Agenda, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) “The Cold War and Its Transition for Koreans: The Meaning from a Constructivist Viewpoint,” in Chung-in Moon, Odd Arne Westad, and Gyoo-hyoung Kahng, eds., Ending the Cold War in Korea: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 115–45Google Scholar
(1968) “Sino-Korean Tributary Relations in the Ch'ing Period,” in , ed., The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 90–111Google Scholar
and (1997) “The Russian Federation and South Korea,” in Stephen J. Blank and , eds., Imperial Decline: Russia's Changing Role in Asia, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 185–210.Google Scholar
(1977) North Korea and the United States, 1955–1972: A Study of North Korea’s Hostility Toward the United States, PhD dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
(1999) “Limitations of South Korea-China Military Cooperation,” Korea Focus, 7(5), 97–9Google Scholar
(1993) “The Political Economy of South Korea-China Bilateralism: Origins, Progress, and Prospects,” in Ilpyong Kim and Hong Pyo Lee, eds., Korea and China in a New World: Beyond Normalization, Seoul: The Sejong Institute, pp. 257–309Google Scholar
(2001) “South Korea Between Eagle and Dragon: Perceptual Ambivalence and Strategic Dilemma,” Asian Survey, 41(5), 777–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Cost Sharing for USFK in Transition: Whither the ROK-U.S. Alliance?” in , , Patrick Morgan, and Andrew Scobell, eds., Recalibrating the U.S.-Republic of Korea Alliance, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, pp. 35–53Google Scholar
(1987) Embattled Korea: The Rivalry for International Support, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(1978) “A Nation Is a Nation, Is a State, Is an Ethnic Group, Is a …,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1(4), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) “The Rajin-Sonbong Free Trade Zone Experiment: North Korea in Pursuit of New International Linkage,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 212–34Google Scholar
Council on Foreign Relations (1999a, July) U.S. Policy Toward North Korea: A Second Look [Online], Task Force Report No. 24, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press. Available at http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=3205.
Council on Foreign Relations (1999b, October) Safeguarding Prosperity in a Global Financial System: The Future International Financial Architecture, Task Reforce Report No. 25, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
Council on Foreign Relations (2003) Meeting the North Korean Nuclear Challenge: Report of an Independent Task Force Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
, , and (2004) Taming Intractable Conflicts: Mediation in the Hardest Cases, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
(2000) “Identity and Persuasion: How Nations Remember Their Pasts and Make Their Futures,” World Politics, 52(3), 275–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981) The Origins of the Korean War: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes 1945–1947, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1984) “The Political Economy of China's Turn Outward,” in , ed., China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy in the Post-Mao Era, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 235–65Google Scholar
(1990) The Origins of the Korean War, Vol. Ⅱ: The Roaring of the Cataract 1947–1950, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) “Anti-Americanism in the Republic of Korea,” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies, 14, 205–29Google Scholar
, , , , , and (1994) “Korea: Procedural and Jurisdictional Questions Regarding Possible Normalization of Relations with North Korea,” Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress 94–933, November 29
(1997) “Russia and the Problem of Korean Unification,” in , ed., The Four Powers and Korean Unification Strategies, Seoul: Institute for Far Eastern Studies, pp. 35–47Google Scholar
and , eds. (2005) China Rising: Power and Motivation in Chinese Foreign Policy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
(1998) “Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies,” International Security, 23(1), 141–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991) “Soviet Reform and the End of the Cold War: Explaining Large-Scale Historical Change,” Review of International Studies 17, 225–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Sino-Soviet Normalization and Its International Implications, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
(2004) “The Emerging Northeast Asian Regional Order,” in , ed. The International Relations of Northeast Asia. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 331–62.Google Scholar
and (1993a) “In Search of a Theory of National Identity,” in Lowell Dittmer and , eds., China's Quest for National Identity, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–31Google Scholar
and . (1993b) China's Quest for National Identity, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) “After the Summit: The Future of Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation,” East Asian Review, 13(2), 75–96.Google Scholar
(1983a) “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12, 205–35Google Scholar
(1983b) “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12, 323–53Google Scholar
(1984) The Empire of the Seas: A Biography of Rear Admiral Robert Wilson Shufeldt, USN, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
(1998a, October) “Special Report No. 38: Mistrust and the Korean Peninsula: Dangers of Miscalculation,” Washington, DC: U.S. Institute for Peace. Available at http://www.usip.org/pubs/specialreports/early/sr_korea.html.
(1998b) “The U.S. Role in Korean Reunification,” Korea and World Affairs, 22(2), 159–76Google Scholar
(1993) “North Korea: Reform, Muddling Through, or Collapse?” NBR Analysis, 4(3), 5–16.Google Scholar
(1994a) “Reform, Muddling Through, or Collapse?” in Thomas H. Henriksen and Lho Kyong-soo, eds., One Korea?, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
(1994b) “Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation: Rapprochement Through Trade?” Korea and World Affairs, 18, 642–61Google Scholar
(1994c) “Demographic Shocks After Communism: Eastern Germany, 1989–93,” Populations and Development Review, 20, 137–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995a) “China's Trade with the DPRK, 1990–1994: Pyongyang's Thrifty New Patron,” Korea and World Affairs, 19, 665–85Google Scholar
(1996) “How Much Money Goes from Japan to North Korea?” Asian Survey, 36, 523–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998a) “North Korea's Unification Policy: 1948–1996,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–57Google Scholar
(1998b) “North Korea's International Trade in Capital Goods, 1970–1995: Indications from Mirror Statistics,” Journal of East Asian Affairs, 13, 165–223.Google Scholar
(1998c) “U.S.-North Korea Economic Relations: Indications from North Korea's Past Trade Performance,” in , ed., The U.S. and the Two Koreas: A New Triangle, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 119–46.Google Scholar
(2004b) “Korean Scenarios Alternative Futures for the Korean Peninsula,” in Ashley J. Tellis and Michael Wills, eds., Strategic Asia 2004–05: Confronting Terrorism in the Pursuit of Power, Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research, pp. 428–55Google Scholar
and , eds. (2001) Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Offspring of Empire: The Koch'ang Kims and the Colonial Origins of Korean Capitalism, 1876–1945. Seattle: University of Washington PressGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (1991) Korea Old and New: A History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “The Empire Strikes Out: The ‘New Imperialism’ and Its Fatal Flaws,” Policy Analysis, 459, 1–27.Google Scholar
and , eds. (2002) Strategic Asia 2002–03: Asian Aftershocks, Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “Russia, Korea, and Northeast Asia,” in Nicholas Eberstadt and , eds., Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 164–87.Google Scholar
(1995) “The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in Its Own Backyard,” British Journal of Political Science, 25, 171–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1946) “Ego Development and Historical Change,” Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 2, 359–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1956) “The Problem of Ego Identity,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 4, 56–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1959) “Identity and the Life Cycle: Selected Papers by Erik H. Erikson,” Psychological Issues, 1, 1–171.Google Scholar
(1968) “Identity and Identity Diffusion,” in Chad Gordon and , eds., The Self in Social Interaction, New York: Wiley, pp. 197–205.Google Scholar
, ed. (1968) The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003, March 24) “Will the Empire Be Fascist?” Available at http://www.transnational.org/forum/meet/2003/Falk_FascistEmpire.html.
and (1982) An Approach to World Order Studies and the World System, New York: Institute for World Order.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (1982) Studies on a Just World Order, Vol. I: Toward a Just World Order, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (1991) Studies on a Just World Order, Vol. Ⅲ: The United Nations and a Just World Order, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(2003) North Korea South Korea: U.S. Policy at a Time of Crisis. New York: Seven Stories PressGoogle Scholar
(2005) “Korea's Slow-Motion Reunification,” Policy Forum Online 05–53A: June 28, 2005. Available at http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/0553Feffer.html.
(2006) “Grave Threats and Grand Bargains: The United States and Regional Order in Northeast Asia,” in , ed. The Future of U.S.-Korean Relations, New York: Routledge, pp. 178–99.Google Scholar
(2003) “Russia's Role on the Korean Peninsula and Great Power Relations in Northeast Asia: Ramifications for the U.S.-ROK Alliance,” NBR Analysis, 14(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
(2003) “The UN System as a Pathway to Security in Asia: A Buttress, Not a Pillar,” in , ed. Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 311–45.Google Scholar
(1992) Korea's Coming Unification, Economist Intelligence Unit M2, London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Google Scholar
(1994) “Korea: Sociopolitical Realities of Reuniting a Divided Nation,” in Thomas H. Hendricksen and Lho Kyong-soo, eds., One Korea? Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
(1998) “Regime Dynamics in North Korea: An European Perspective,” in , ed. Understanding Regime Dynamics in North Korea: Contending Perspectives and Comparative Implications, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 113–39.Google Scholar
(2003) “North Korea–South Korea Relations: Symbolic Links, Real Gaps,” Comparative Connections [Online], 5 (2), 91–100. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0302q.pdf.Google Scholar
(1993/94) “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia,” International Security, 18(3), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992/93) “International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War,” International Security, 17(3), 5–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976) “On the Future, Future Studies and Future Attitudes,” , H. Wiberg, A. Sicinski, , eds., Images of the World in the Year 2000: A Comparative Ten Nation Study, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, pp. 3–21Google Scholar
and (1995) “Looking Across the Yalu: Chinese Assessments of North Korea,” Asian Survey, 35(6), 528–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Sino-Russian Relations,” in , ed., China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 114–32Google Scholar
(1993) Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy, Arlington, VA: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
and , eds. (1958) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1981) War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Rising to the Challenge: China's Grand Strategy and International Security, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1993) Uncertain Partners: Stalin, Mao, and the Korean War, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
, ed. (1996) Remembering and Forgetting: The Legacy of War and Peace in East Asia, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Good Friends (1999) “The Report on Daily Life and Human Rights of North Korean Food Refugees in China” [Online]. Available at http://www.jungto.org/gf.
(1997) “North Korean Regime Crisis: U.S. Perspectives and Responses,” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 9, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000, July 31) “Why Tokyo Will Be a Larger Player in Asia,” Northeast Asia Peace And Security Network Special Report
(2001) Japan's Reluctant Realism: Foreign Policy Challenges in an Era of Uncertain Power, New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Japan and Globalization: From Opportunity to Restraint,” in , ed., East Asia and Globalization, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 55–79Google Scholar
(1998) Korea and Its Futures: Unification and the Unfinished War, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
(2005) “U.S.–Korea Relations: South Korea Confronts U.S. Hardliners on North Korea,” Comparative Connections [Online], 6(4), 47–57. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0404q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2002) “Common Security in North Korea: Quest for a New Paradigm in Inter-Korean Relations,” Asian Survey, 42(3), 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (2005) Confronting the Bush Doctrine: Critical Views from the Asia-Pacific. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
(1994) “Russo-North Korean Relations in Transition,” in , ed., Foreign Relations of North Korea During Kim Il Sung's Last Days, Seoul: Sejong Institute, pp. 331–55Google Scholar
(1986) “What Is Nationalism and Why Should We Study It?” International Organization, 40, 707–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Power and Tactics in International Negotiation: How Week Nations Bargain with Strong Nations, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1994) “Citizenship and National Identity,” in , ed., The Condition of Citizenship, London: Sage, pp. 20–35Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (1999). Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(1990) Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
and (2005) Hunger and Human Rights: The Politics of Famine in North Korea, Washington, DC: U.S. Committee for Human Rights in North Korea.Google Scholar
, , and (1997) “Japanese Colonialism and Korean Development: A Critique,” World Development, 25(6), 867–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001) “Remembering Japan and North Korea: The Politics of Memory in South Korea,” in , ed., Memory and History in East and Southeast Asia: Issues of Identity in International Relations, Washington, DC: CSIS Press, pp. 101–12.Google Scholar
(1999) National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1997) “Korean Reunification and the United States: A Futuristic and Speculative Assessment,” in Dalchoong Kim and Chung-in Moon, eds. History, Cognition, and Peace in East Asia, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 215–33.Google Scholar
(2004) “Korea and U.S. Culture: Cultural Interaction from a Korean Perspective,” Pacific Partners: Korean-American Relations in the Twenty-first Century. Proceedings of the Conference on Enhancing the Partnership Between Korea and the United States in the Twenty-First Century, The Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii, ManoaGoogle Scholar
(1993) “Fundamentals of Korea's New Diplomacy,” Korea and World Affairs, 17(2), 227–45Google Scholar
(1995) Segyehwa sidae ui Hankuk Oeykyo [Korean Diplomacy in an Era of Globalization], Seoul: Chisik Sangyopsa.Google Scholar
(1999) Samkak kwankyae ui taetong: Mikuk, Chungkuk kuriko Hanpanto [The Quickening of a Triangular Relations: The United States, China, and the Korean Peninsula], Kyekan Sasang [Quarterly Thought], 11, 29–70
and (1990) “China's Decision to Enter the Korean War: History Revisited,” The China Quarterly, 121, 94–115.Google Scholar
(1995) “The New Regime in North Korea and Its Future: Principal Scenarios,” in The Future of North Korea: Implications for the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia, Seoul: The Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security, pp. 21–37Google Scholar
(1996) Japan's Nuclear Future: The Plutonium Debate and East Asian Security, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
(1998b) “U.S. Policy Toward North Korea,” in Dae-Suk Suh and Chae Jin Lee, eds., North Korea After Kim Il Sung, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 61–83Google Scholar
(2002) Korean Endgame: A Strategy for Reunification and U.S. Disengagement, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: A Proposal by the Task Force on U.S. Korea Policy, Chicago: The Center for International Policy and the Center for East Asian Studies, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
(2001) “The PRC-DPRK Rapprochement and China's Dilemma in Korea,” Asian Perspective, 25(3), 247–59Google Scholar
(1998) Korea: Division, Reunification, and U.S. Foreign Policy, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
(2002/03) “The Effects of Korean Unification on the U.S. Military Presence in Northeast Asia,” Parameters, Winter, 120–32Google Scholar
(1992) What Is Asia to Us? Russia's Asian Heartland Yesterday and Today, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1988) “American Nuclear Hegemony in Korea,” Journal of Peace Research, 25(4), 351–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Pacific Powderkeg: American Nuclear Dilemmas in Korea, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
(1993b) “The Republic of Korea and the Nuclear Issue,” in , ed., Asian Flashpoint, Canberra, Australia: Allen & Unwin, pp. 51–83Google Scholar
(1994c) “Should the United States Supply Light-Water Reactors to Pyongyang?” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 6, 179–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Bush's Bipolar Disorder and the Looming Failure of Multilateral Talks with North Korea,” Arms Control Toda, 33(8), 3–6.Google Scholar
(1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
and (1998) “Mercantile Realism and Japanese Foreign Policy,” International Security, 22(4), 171–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). “Korea,” in Gregory Henderson, Richard Ned Lebow, and , eds. Divided Nations in a Divided World, New York: McKay, pp. 43–96Google Scholar
(1980) National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Exp. ed., Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2003) “The High and the Mighty: Bush's National-Security Strategy and the New American Hubris,” The American Prospect, January 13, 28–31.Google Scholar
(1996) The State, War, and the State of War, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Thawing Korea's Cold War: The Path to Peace on the Korean Peninsula,” Foreign Affairs, 78, 8–12.Google Scholar
(1975) A Politics of Identity: Liberation and the Natural Community, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
(1998) “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory,” International Security, 23(1), 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) “Beijing's Defense Strategy and the Korean Peninsula,” Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, 14, 50–67.Google Scholar
(1999) Japan's Economic Power and Security: Japan and North Korea, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
(1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
(1998) Pukhan ui chinsil kwa hwi [North Korea's Truth and Lies], Seoul: Institute of National Unification Policy.Google Scholar
(1999) Nanun yoksaui chili rul poattda [I Have Witnessed Historical Truth], Seoul: Hanul.Google Scholar
(2003b) “The Challenges of American Imperial Power,” Naval War College Review, 56(2), 53–63.Google Scholar
(2004) “Illusions of Empire: Defining the New American Order,” Foreign Affairs, 83(2), 144–54Google Scholar
and (2003a) International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
and (2003b) “Conclusion: Images of Order in the Asia-Pacific and the Role of the United States,” in and , eds., International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 421–39Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (1997) “Armed Conflicts and Fatalities 1945–1994,” The Military Balance, 1997–1998, London: IISS.
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2001) The Military Balance, 2001–2002. London: IISS.
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2002) The Military Balance, 2002–2003. New York: Oxford University Press
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2004) The Military Balance, 2004–2005, New York: Oxford University Press.
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2005) The Military Balance, 2005–2006. New York: Oxford University Press
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1992) 1992 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1993) 1993 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1994) 1994 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1995) 1995 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1996) 1996 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1997) 1997 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1998) 1998 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
and (2001). “Remembering Japan and North Korea: The Politics of Memory in South Korea,” in , ed., Memory and History in East and Southeast Asia: Issues of Identity in International Relations. Washington, DC: CSIS Press, pp. 101–12.Google Scholar
(1990) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2004) Diplomatic Bluebook 2004. Tokyo: Government of Japan. Available at http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/other/bluebook/2004/index.html.
, , and (1996) “Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security,” in , ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 33–75Google Scholar
(1976) Perceptions and Misperceptions in International Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1980) “The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 563–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991/92) “The Future of World Politics: Will It Resemble the Past?” International Security, 16(3), 39–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Theories of War in an Era of Leading-Power Peace,” American Political Science Review, 96(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) “China and North Korea: A Fragile Relationship of Strategic Convenience,” Journal of Contemporary China, 10(28), 387–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) “The PLA, the CCP and the Formulation of Chinese Defense and Foreign Policy,” in and , eds., Power and Responsibility in Chinese Foreign Policy, Canberra, Australia: Asia Pacific Press, pp. 105–131.Google Scholar
and (1992) “China's Policy Toward the Korean Peninsula,” Asian Survey, 32(12), 1137–56Google Scholar
(2004) The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
(2005) “The Real ‘China Threat’,” Asia Times [Online], March 19. Available at http://www.atimes.com/korea.html.Google Scholar
(1995) Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) “China's Militarized Interstate Dispute Behaviour 1949–1992: A First Cut at the Data,” China Quarterly, 153, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Socialization in International Institutions: The ASEAN Way and International Relations Theory,” in and , eds., International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 107–62Google Scholar
(2004) “China's International Relations: The Political and Security Dimensions,” in , ed., The International Relations of Northeast Asia, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 65–100Google Scholar
and (1999) “China's Engagement with Multilateral Security Institutions,” in Alastair Iain Johnston and , eds., Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power, New York: Routledge, pp. 235–72Google Scholar
, , , and (2001). “Treating Identity as a Variable,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, August 30–September 2
(1998) “Russia and Korea,” in Bae-ho Hahn and Chae-jin Lee, eds., The Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers, Seoul: The Sejong Institute.Google Scholar
(2000a) “DPRK-Russian Rapprochement and Its Implications for Korean Security,” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 6, 193–223.Google Scholar
(2000b) Gorbachev's Foreign Policy Toward the Korean Peninsula, 1985–1991, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellon.Google Scholar
(2001) “The New Friendship Treaty Between Moscow and Pyongyang,” Comparative Strategy, 20(5), 467–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Russia and the Korean Peace Process,” in Tae-Hwan Kwak and Seung-Ho Joo, eds., The Korean Peace Process and the Four Powers, Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 143–70.Google Scholar
and , eds. (2002) Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy, San Francisco: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
and (1967) The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2004) “Japan in Inter-Korean Relations,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97–116Google Scholar
and (2000) “Japanese Security and Peace Regime on the Korean Peninsula,” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 9(1), 117–35Google Scholar
(2005a) “Japan–Korea Relations: History Impedes the Future,” Comparative Connections [Online], 7(1), 123–32. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0501q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2005b) “Japan: U.S. Partner or Focused on Abductees?” The Washington Quarterly, 28(4), 107–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005) “Japan–Korea Relations: Little Progress on North Korea or History Dispute,” Comparative Connections [Online], 7(2), 133–42. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0502q.pdf.Google Scholar
(1995) “Is Realism Dead? The Domestic Sources of International Politics,” International Organization, 49(4), 751–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
and (2001/02) “Japan, Asia-Pacific Security, and the Case of Analytical Eclecticism,” International Security, 26(3), 153–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) “How Did the Cold War Die? Principles for an Autopsy,” Mershon International Studies Review, 38, 11–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
, , and (2003) “The Reluctant Empire: In a Time of Great Consequence,” Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(1), 11–31.Google Scholar
(1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1996) “Normalization and After: Prospects for the Sino-South Korean Relations,” Korean and World Affairs, 20, 572–80Google Scholar
(1987) “The Lessons of Korea and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965,” in , , and , eds., New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston: Allen & Unwin, pp. 302–49Google Scholar
(1992) Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) “North Korea and the United Nations,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 258–79Google Scholar
and , eds. (1997) Peace and Security in Northeast Asia: The Nuclear Issue and the Korean Peninsula, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
(2004) “The Challenges of Peacefully Reunifying the Korean Peninsula,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave, pp. 197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1967) Korea and the Politics of Imperialism, 1876–1910, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1996) “The Uncertain Future of North Korea: Soft Landing or Crash Landing?” Korea and World Affairs, 20(4), 623–36Google Scholar
and . (1997) History, Cognition, and Peace in East Asia, Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
(1990) “International Trends in Korean War Studies: A Review of the Documentary Literature,” Korea and World Affairs, 14(2), 326–46Google Scholar
(1993) Korea's Relations with Her Neighbors in a Changing World, Elizabeth, NJ: Holly.Google Scholar
(1998). “Japan in North Korean Foreign Policy,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 116–39.Google Scholar
(2006) “Japanese-North Korean Relations Under the Koizumi Government,” in Hong Nack Kim and Young Whan Kihl, eds., North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 161–82.Google Scholar
(1994) “The Soviet Union/Russia and Korea: Dynamics of ‘New Thinking,’” in , ed., Korea and the World: Beyond the Cold War, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 83–95Google Scholar
(1975) Divided Korea: The Politics of Development, 1945–72, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980) The Last Phase of the East Asian World Order, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1996) “No Way Out: North Korea's Impending Collapse,” Harvard International Review, 18(2), 22–71.Google Scholar
(1976) “The Developmental Problems of Korean Nationalism,” in Se-Jin Kim and Chang-hyun Cho, eds., Korea: A Divided Nation, Silver Spring, MD: The Research Institute on Korean Affairs, pp. 10–37Google Scholar
(1979) China, the United Nations, and World Order, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1980/81) “United States Korean Policy and World Order,” Alternatives: A Journal of World Policy, 6, 419–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) “North Korea and the Non-Communist World: The Quest for National Identity,” in Chong-Sik Lee and Se-Hee Yoo, eds., North Korea in Transition, Berkeley: Center for Korean Studies, Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California at Berkeley, pp. 17–42Google Scholar
(1995) “North Korea in 1994: Brinkmanship, Breakdown and Breakthrough,” Asian Survey, 35(1), 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) “Puk-Mi hyopsang kwa Pukhan ui chunryak” [DPRK-US Negotiations and North Korea's Strategy], in Kwak Tae-hwan, ed., Pukhan ui Hyopsang Chunryak kwa NamPukhan Kwangkye [North Korea's Negotiating Strategy and South-North Relations], Seoul: Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University, pp. 163–86Google Scholar
(1997c) “North Korea and the United Nations,” International Journal of Korean Studies, 1, 77–105.Google Scholar
ed. (1998a) North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998b) “In Search of a Theory of North Korean Foreign Policy,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–31Google Scholar
(1998c) “Chinese Foreign Policy in Theory and Practice,” in , ed. China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
(1999) “China and the United Nations,” in and , eds., China Joins the World: Progress and Prospects, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, pp. 42–89Google Scholar
(2000a) “Korea and Globalization (Segyehwa): A Framework for Analysis,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–28Google Scholar
(2000b) “Korea's Globalization Drive: Promise Versus Performance,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242–81Google Scholar
(2000c) “North Korean Informal Politics,” in Lowell Dittmer, Haruhiro Fukui, and Peter N. S. Lee, eds. Informal Politics in East Asia, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237–68Google Scholar
(2001) “The Making of China's Korea Policy in the Era of Reform,” in , ed. The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 371–408.Google Scholar
(2004a) “Introduction: Managing the Korean Conflict,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) “China's New Role in the Nuclear Confrontation,” Asian Perspective, 28(4), 147–84Google Scholar
(2004c) “China in World Politics,” in and , eds., Does China Matter? A Reassessment, New York: Routledge, pp. 37–53Google Scholar
(2004d) “Regionalization and Regionalism in East Asia,” Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(1), 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ed. (2004e) The International Relations of Northeast Asia. Lanha, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
and (1993) “Whither China's Quest for National Identity?” in Lowell Dittmer and , eds., China's Quest for National Identity, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 237–90Google Scholar
and (2004) “Conflict Management,” in and , eds., Encyclopaedia of Government and Politics, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, New York: Routledge, pp. 980–93Google Scholar
and (2004) “Inter-Korean Economic Relations,” in , ed., Inter Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Korean Views on the Taiwan-PRC Relations and the Japan Factor,” in James R. Lilley and Chuck Downs, eds., Crisis in the Taiwan Strait, Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, pp. 303–25Google Scholar
(1999) “Strategic Relations Between Beijing and Pyongyang: Growing Strains amid Lingering Ties,” in James R. Lilley and David Shambaugh, eds., China's Military Faces the Future, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 295–321Google Scholar
(1984) The Foreign Policy Systems of North and South Korea, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1994) “Prospects for Change in North Korea,” Korean Journal of National Unification, 3, 237–55Google Scholar
(1998) “Japan and Korea,” in Bae-ho Hahn and Chae-jin Lee, eds. The Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers, Seoul: Sejong Institute, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar
(2000) “Segyehwa, the Republic of Korea, and the United Nations,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 196–216Google Scholar
, , , , and (1977) Pukhan Oekyo-ron [On North Korea's Foreign Policy], Seoul: Kyungnam University Press.
(1994) “Where Do High Growth Political Economies Come From? The Japanese Lineage of Korea's ‘Developmental State,’” World Development, 22(9), 1269–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Russia's National Identity: Foreign Policy Dimension,” International Affairs [Moscow], 49(4), 97–106.Google Scholar
(1995) Hankuk ui Kukka yiyik [Korea's National Interest], Seoul: Pommunsa.
(2003) “The Russian Federation and the Two Korean States: Economic Cooperation the Early 21 Century,” The Seinan Law Review 35 (3–4), 95–128.Google Scholar
(1998) “Agent Versus Structure in the Construction of National Identity,” in Vendulka Kubalkova, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert, eds., International Relations in a Constructed World, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 101–22.Google Scholar
(1993) “The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik Without Politics,” Review of International Studies, 19, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (1996) Identities in International Relations, New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “The American Empire and the Islamic Challenge,” The Weekly Standard, 7(9), 25.Google Scholar
(1996) “Threat Environment for a United Korea: 2010,” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 8, 84–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) The End of the American Era: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
and (2004) The U.S.-China Relationship Facing International Security Crises: Three Case Studies in Post-9/11 Bilateral Relations, Washington, DC: The Nixon Center.Google Scholar
(1996) “North and South Korea: Beyond Deterrence,” Speech delivered to the Asia Society Corporate Conference, Seoul, Korea, May 11
(2004a) “Cold War Alienates Seoul, Moscow,” The Korea Times, September 17 [Online] Available at http://times.hankooki.com.Google Scholar
(2004b) “North Korean Refugees in Northeast China,” Asian Survey, 44(6), 856–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Integrating China into the Global Economy, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
, , and (2004) Ambivalent Allies?: A Study of South Korean Attitudes Toward the U.S.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, March.Google Scholar
(1981) Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 57–97Google Scholar
(1994) “The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism,” International Organization, 48, 249–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998a) “The Evolution of China's Two Korea Policy,” in Bae-ho Hahn and Chae-jin Lee, eds., The Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers, Seoul: Sejong Institute, pp. 115–46Google Scholar
(1998b) “China and North Korea,” in Dae-sook Suh and Chae-jin Lee, eds., North Korea After Kim Il-Sung, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 165–209.Google Scholar
and (1981) Koreans in Japan: Ethnic Conflict and Accommodation, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1985) Japan and Korea: The Political Dimension, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
(2000) “Development of North Korea's Legal Regime Governing Foreign Business Cooperation: A Revisit Under the New Socialist Constitution of 1998,” Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 21(1), 199–242.Google Scholar
(2001) PukHan-Chungkuk Kwan Kyae 1945–2000 [DPRK-PRC Relations, 1945–2000]. Seoul: Jungsim.
(1999a) “Preventing Refugee Crisis: A Challenge to Human Security,” Asian Perspective, 23, 133–54Google Scholar
(1999a) “Responses to North Korean Food Refugees,” Security Dialogue 30, 122–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) “International Organizations and the Inter-Korean Peace Process: Traditional Security Versus Nontraditional Security,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–96.Google Scholar
(2004) “The Roots and Patterns of Anti-Americanism in Korean Society: A Survey-Based Analysis,” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies, 14, 183–204.Google Scholar
(1982) The United States and the Division of Korea, 1945, Seoul: Kyunghee University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “The Cost and Financing of Korean Unification,” in Sung-Hee Jwa, Chung-in Moon, and Jeong-Ho Roh, eds., Constitutional Handbook on Korean Unification, Part Ⅲ, Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute, pp. 1125–61.Google Scholar
and (1997) “Unified Korea and New Strategies for National Survival,” in Dalchoong Kim and Chung-in Moon, eds., History, Cognition, and Peace in East Asia, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 177–99.Google Scholar
(1999) “The Three Russias: Decline, Revolution, and Reconstruction,” in , ed., A Century's Journey: How the Great Powers Shape the World, New York: Basic Books, pp. 139–90.Google Scholar
(2001) “Theories of Interstate and Intrastate War: A Levels-of-Analysis Approach,” in , Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, eds., Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, pp. 3–27Google Scholar
(2000a) “North Korea and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime,” in James Clay Moltz and , eds., The North Korean Nuclear Program, New York: Routledge, pp. 138–55Google Scholar
(2000b) Rossiya I Koreya v geopolitike evraziiskogo vostoka (xx vek) [Russia and Korea in the Geopolitics of the Eurasian East (20th century)], Moscow: Nauchnaya Kniga.
(1962) Nations in Alliance: Limits of Interdependence, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Rogue States and U.S. Foreign Policy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
(2001) “What's in a Name? The Changing Foreign Policy Lexicon,” Journal of International Affairs, 54(2), 375–92Google Scholar
(2003) “Non-Proliferation and the Dilemmas of Regime Change,” Survival, 45(4), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (1994) Zhongguo dui Chaoxian he Hanguo zhengci wenjian huibian 5 (1974–1994) [A Collection of Documents on China's Policy toward the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea, Vol. 5 (1974–1994)], Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
(2003) “China and the North Korean Crisis: Facing Test and Transition,” Pacific Affairs, 76(3), 347–73Google Scholar
and , eds. (1993) The Cold War and After: Prospects for Peace, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1992) U.S-Korean Relations from Liberation to Self-Reliance: The Twenty-Year Record: An Interpretative Summary of the Archives of the U.S. Department of State for the Period 1945 to 1965, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(1975) “Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict,” World Politics, 27(2), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “The Reluctant Imperialist: Terrorism, Failed States and the Case for American Empire,” Foreign Affairs, 81(2), 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “United States-North Korean Relations: From Welfare to Workfare?” in Samuel S. Kim and Tai Hwan Lee, eds., North Korea and Northeast Asia, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 61–88Google Scholar
(1995) “The Origins, Evolution, and Current Politics of the North Korean Nuclear Program,” Nonproliferation Review, 2(3), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a) “The Natural Disasters of the Mid-1990s and the Their Impact on the Implementation of the Agreed Framework,” in James Clay Moltz and , eds., The North Korean Nuclear Program, New York: Routledge, pp. 76–90Google Scholar
(2000b) “North Korea's Negotiations with the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO),” in James Clay Moltz and , eds., The North Korean Nuclear Program, New York: Routledge, pp. 156–70Google Scholar
(2004) “Kim Jong Il Re-Embraces the Bear, Looking for the Morning Calm: North Korea's Policy Toward Russia Since 1994,” in , ed., North Korea and the World: Explaining Pyongyang's Foreign Policy, Seoul: Kyungnam University Press, pp. 239–84Google Scholar
and (1979) Utopian Thought in the Western World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2003, November 26) “Japan-North Korean Relations: Selected Issues,” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
(2004, July 1) “South Korea-U.S. Economic Relations: Cooperation, Friction, and Future Prospects,” CRS Report for Congress, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
and (2003, March 17) “U.S. Assistance to North Korea,” Report to Congress, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
(1959) “The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon,” in , ed., Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1967) Writings of Young Marx on Philosophy and Society, Lloyd D. Easton and , trans. and eds., Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
(1985) The Reluctant Crusade: American Foreign Policy in Korea, 1941–1950, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Target North Korea: Pushing North Korea to the Brink of Nuclear Catastrophe, New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
(2001) “The Post-Korean Unification Security Landscape and U.S. Security Policy in Northeast Asia,” in and , eds., Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 251–96Google Scholar
(1999) “Chinese Military Strategy for the Korean Peninsula,” in James R. Lilley and David Shambaugh, eds., China's Military Faces the Future, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 271–94Google Scholar
(1949) Social Theory and Social Structure: Toward the Codification of Theory and Research, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
(2005) “Russo-North Korean Relations,” Paper presented at the International Council for Korean Studies Conference 2005, Arlington, VA, August 5–6
(2006) “Russo-North Korean Relations Under Kim Jong Il,” in Young Whan Kihl and Hong Nack Kim, eds., North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 203–14Google Scholar
and (1964) The Far East in the Modern World, Rev. ed., New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) (1979), Han'guk oegyo 30-nyôn [Thirty Year Diplomacy of the ROK], Seoul: MOFA.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) (1997) Oekyo paekso 1997 [Diplomatic White Paper 1997], Seoul: MOFA.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (1998) HanChung kwankye hyunhwang mit choekun Chungkuk chungse [The State of ROK-PRC Relations and Recent Chinese Affairs], Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (1999) Oekyo paekso 1998 [Diplomatic White Paper 1998], Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2000) Oekyo paekso 1999 [Diplomatic White Paper 1999]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2001) Oekyo paekso 2000 [Diplomatic White Paper 2000]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2002) Oekyo paekso 2001 [Diplomatic White Paper 2001]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2003) Oekyo paekso 2002 [Diplomatic White Paper 2002]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2004) Oekyo paekso 2003 [Diplomatic White Paper 2003]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2005) Oekyo paekso 2004 [Diplomatic White Paper 2004]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of National Defense (MND) (2000) 2000 Defense White Papers, Seoul: MND.
Ministry of National Defense (MND) (2003) ROK-US Alliance and USFK, Rev. Edition, Seoul: MND.
Ministry of National Defense (MND) (2005) 2004 Defense White Paper, Seoul: MND.
Ministry of Unification (MOU) (2003a, February) Tong'il paekso 2003 [Unification White Paper 2003]. Seoul: MOU.
Ministry of Unification (MOU) (2003b, December) 2004 PukHan Kaeyo [2004 North Korean Synopsis]. Seoul: MOU.
Ministry of Unification (MOU) (2004, February) Tong'il paekso 2004 [Unification White Paper 2004]. Seoul: MOU.
Ministry of Unification (MOU) (2005, February) Tong'il paekso 2005 [Unification White Paper 2005]. Seoul: MOU.
(2002/03) “A Blueprint for U.S. Policy Toward a Unified Korea,” Washington Quarterly, 26(1), 23–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) “International Quasi-Crisis: Theory and a Case of Japan-South Korean Bilateral Friction,” Asian Perspective, 15(2), 99–123.Google Scholar
(2002) “Sustaining Inter-Korean Reconciliation: North-South Korea Cooperation,” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies, 12, 225–50Google Scholar
(2005) “Rethinking Korean Unification and the Future of North Korea,” Korea and World Affairs, 29(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (2000) The Perry Report, the Missile Quagmire, and the North Korean Question: The Quest of New Alternatives, Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (2001) Ending the Cold War in Korea: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
and (2001) “The Future of the North Korean System,” in , ed. The North Korean System in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Palgrave, pp. 221–58.Google Scholar
(2000) “Strangers in the Midst of Globalization: Migrant Workers and Korean Nationalism,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–69Google Scholar
(2003) “Korean Nationalism, Anti-Americanism, and Democratic Consolidation,” in , ed., Korea's Democratization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–58.Google Scholar
(1978) Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt, White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979) Strategies of Survival: The Foreign Policy Dilemmas of Smaller Asian States, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
and , eds. (1984) The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (2005, February 9) The North Korean Economy: Background and Policy Analysis, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
and (1986) Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(1992) “North Korea's Nuclear Weapons Program,” CRS Issue Brief. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
(1994a) “Comprehensive Negotiations with North Korea: A Viable Alternative for a Failed U.S. Strategy,” Korea and World Affairs, 18, 250–72Google Scholar
(1994b) “Opportunities and Challenges in Clinton's Confidence-Building Strategy Towards North Korea,” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 6, 145–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994) “Less Filling, Tastes Great: The Realist-Neoliberal Debate,” World Politics, 46, 209–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1998) Economic Integration of the Korean Peninsula, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
(2000a) Avoiding the Apocalypse: The Future of the Two Koreas, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
(2000b) “The Economics of Korean Unification,” [Online], Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Available at http://www.iie./publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=364.
(2001) “Economic Strategies for Reunification,” in Nicholas Eberstadt and , eds., Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: The National Bureau of Asian Research and University of Washington Press, pp. 191–228Google Scholar
(2002) “North Korea's External Economic Relations: Globalization in ‘Our Own Style’,” in Samuel S. Kim and Tai Hwan Lee, eds., North Korea and Northeast Asia, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 165–93Google Scholar
(2003, July) “Famine and Reform in North Korea,” Institute for International Economics Working Paper, WP 03–5, July
(2004a) “The Strategic Importance of U.S.-Korea Economic Relations,” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies, 14, 79–102.Google Scholar
(2004b) Korea After Kim Jong-il, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
, , and (1998) “The Costs and Benefits of Korean Unification,” Asian Survey, 38, 801–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North Korea Advisory Group (1999), “Report to the Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives,” November
(1988) Reflections on Political Identity, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1974) “Transnational Relations and Interstate Conflicts: An Empirical Analysis,” International Organization, 28, 961–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “East Asian Security: The Case for Deep Engagement,” Foreign Affairs, 74(4), 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999) “North Korea Between Collapse and Reform,” Asian Survey, 39(2), 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) North Korea Through the Looking Glass. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
and (2003) Crisis on the Korean Peninsula: How to Deal with a Nuclear North Korea, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
(2000) “The North Korean Crisis and Japan's Choice,” in , ed., The Two Koreas and the United States, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 119–29Google Scholar
(2003) “The United States and the Korean Peace Process,” in Tae-Hwan Kwak and Seung-Ho Joo, eds., The Korean Peace Process and the Four Powers, Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 76–97Google Scholar
. (1976) Images of the World in the Year 2000: A Comparative Ten Nation Study, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
(1985) “Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies,” World Politics, 38, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Korean Unification and Japan's Foreign Policy,” in Lee Young-Sun and Masao Okonogi, eds., Japan and Korean Unification, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 33–50Google Scholar
(1998) “Human Needs, Human Rights, and Regime Legitimacy: The North Korean Anomaly,” in Moon Chung-in, ed., Understanding Regime Dynamics in North Korea, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 221–35Google Scholar
(2006) “The Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Flows in Northeast Asia,” in , Gilbert Rozman, , and Stephen Kotkin, eds., Korea at the Center: Dynamics of Regionalism in Northeast Asia, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 244–56Google Scholar
(1998) “International Perceptions of Korean Unification Issues,” Korea Focus, 6(1), 72–80.Google Scholar
(1999) “The Great Powers in the Twentieth Century: From Dawn to Dusk,” in , ed., A Century's Journey: How the Great Powers Shape the World, New York: Basic Books, pp. 1–31Google Scholar
(1994) Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Russian Security in the Pacific Asian Region: The Dangers of Isolation,” in Gilbert Rozman, , and Koji Watanabe, eds., Russia and East Asia: The 21st Century Security Environment, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 44–59Google Scholar
(1999) “Review of United States Policy Toward North Korea: Findings and Recommendations.” Available at http://www.state.gov/www/regions/eap/991012_northkorea_rpt.html.
(2002) “The United States and the Future of East Asian Security: – Quo Vadis?” in , ed., Building Common Peace and Prosperity in Northeast Asia, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 119–29Google Scholar
(1999) “Between Europe and Asia: The Search for Russia's Civilizational Identity,” in , ed., Russia and Asia: The Emerging Security Agenda, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–51Google Scholar
(2003) “The United States, North Korea, and the End of the Agreed Framework,” Naval War College Review, 56(3), 11–49.Google Scholar
(1991) “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations,” American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1303–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) “The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate,” International Organization, 48(2), 313–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “A State of the Nation Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation (Moscow, May 16, 2003),” International Affairs (Moscow), 49(4), 1–17.Google Scholar
(1988) “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization, 42, 427–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “A Three Bloc World? The New East Asian Regionalism,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2(2), 167–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005) “Responses: Red-Handed: The Truth About North Korea's Weapons Program,” Foreign Affairs, 84(2), 142–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003, January 24) “North Korea: Economic Sanctions,” Report for Congress, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
(1994) “Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War,” International Organization, 48(2), 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Korea in the Pacific Century: Selected Speeches 1990–1992, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
(1998) “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics, 51, 144–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (1993) The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) “Toward Single-Country Theories of Foreign Policy: The Case of the USSR,” in Charles Hermann, , and James Rosenau, eds., New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin, pp. 53–74Google Scholar
(1990) Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1994) “China in a Bifurcated World: Competing Theoretical Perspectives,” in Thomas W. Robinson and David Shambaugh, eds., Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 524–51.Google Scholar
(1996) “The Dynamics of Globalization: Toward an Operational Formulation,” Security Dialogue, 27(3), 247–62Google Scholar
(2002b) “Japan and South Korea: Should the U.S. Be Worried About Their New Spat in 2001?” Pacific Review, 15(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002, May) “South Korean Identity: In Search of National Pride, East Asian Regionalism and a Role in Globalization,” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Princeton University
(2003) “Japan's North Korean Initiative and U.S.-Japanese Relations,” Orbis, 47(3), 527–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Northeast Asia's Stunted Regionalism: Bilateral Distrust in the Shadow of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , eds. (1999) Russia and East Asia: The 21st Century Security Environment, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
(1997) “Russia's Relations with North Korea,” in and , eds., Imperial Decline: Russia's Changing Role in Asia, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 155–84Google Scholar
(1998) “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization, 52(4), 855–85
(1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (2001) Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
(2004) “Payback Time: Japan-North Korea Economic Relations,” in Ahn Choong-yong, Nicholas Eberstadt, and Lee Young-sun, eds., A New International Engagement Framework for North Korea? Contending Perspectives, Washington, DC: Korean Economic Institute of America, pp. 317–33Google Scholar
(1997) “North Korea at a Crossroads,” Essays in Public Policy No. 73, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution, Stanford University, pp. 1–18.
and (1972) Communism in Korea, Part I: The Movement, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2003) “America's Vulnerable Imperialism,” YaleGlobal, November 24. Available at http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=2873.Google Scholar
(1996) “Globalisation and Collective Identities,” in and , eds. Identities in International Relations, New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 38–78.Google Scholar
and , eds. (1971) Small States in International Relations, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell.Google Scholar
(1998) Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2004a, March) China and North Korea: From Comrades-in-Arms to Allies at Arm's Length, Strategic Studies Institute Monograph, Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) “China and Inter-Korean Relations: Beijing as Balancer,” in , ed. Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
(2005, July) North Korea's Strategic Intentions, Strategic Studies Institute Monograph, Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejong Institute (1995) ’95 Kukmin uisik chosa [Survey of National Consciousness, 1995], Seoul: Sejong Institute.
Sejong Institute (1997) Korea's National Strategy: Agenda Setting for the 21st Century, Seoul: Sejong Institute.
(2005) “China: Background Paper on the Situation of North Koreans in China,” A Writenet Report, Commissioned by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Protection Information Section (DIP). January. Available http://www.unhcr.ch/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home/opendoc.pd?tbl=RSDCOI&id=4231d11d4.
(2006) “The Exodus: North Korea's Out-Migration,” in , ed., The Future of U.S.- Korean Relations, New York: Routledge, pp. 130–59.Google Scholar
(2003) “China and the Korean Peninsula: Playing for the Long Term,” The Washington Quarterly, 26(2), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004/05) “China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order,” International Security, 29(3), 64–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (2006) Power Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2003) “Weihu DongBeiYa anquan de dangwu zhili [The Urgent Task of Preserving Peace in Northeast Asia],” Shijie jingji yu zhengshi [World Economics and Politics], 9, 53–58
(2003) “How to Understand and Deal with the DPRK Nuclear Crisis,” Ta Kung Pao (Hong Kong), January 15, p. A11 (trans. FBIS-CHI-2003–0115, January 16, 2003)Google Scholar
and (2004) “The Politics of Nationalism in U.S.-Korean Relations,” Asian Perspective, 28(4), 119–45Google Scholar
(1986) “The Struggle for Democracy in South Korea in the 1980s and the Rise of Anti-Americanism,” Third World Quarterly, 8(4), 1195–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Who is Fighting Peace in Korea? An Undiplomatic History,” World Policy Journal, 24, 44–58.Google Scholar
(1998) Disarming Strangers: Nuclear Diplomacy with North Korea, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) “Negotiating an End to North Korea's Missile Making,” Arms Control Today, 30(5), 3–7.Google Scholar
(1984/85) “Richness, Rigor, and Relevance in the Study of Soviet Foreign Policy,” International Security, 9(3), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) “North Korea's Decline and China's Strategic Dilemma. Special Report,” Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
(1999) Negotiating on the Edge: North Korean Negotiating Behavior, Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
(2000/01) “North Korea's Challenge of Regime Survival: Internal Problems and Implications for the Future,” Pacific Affairs, 73(4), 517–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003a) “China–Korea Relations: Beijing in the Driver's Sear? China's Rising Influence on the Two Koreas,” Comparative Connections [Online], 4(4): 95–101. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0204q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2003b) “China–Korea Relations: A Turning Point for China?” Comparative Connections [Online], 5(2): 101–07. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0302q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2003c) “China–Korea Relations: Middle Kingdom Diplomacy and the North Korean Nuclear Crisis,” Comparative Connections [Online], 5(3): 113–18. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0303q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2004) “China–Korea Relations: No Shows, Economic Growth, and People Problems,” Comparative Connections [Online], 5(4): 111–17. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0304q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2005) “China–Korea Relations: Six-Party Success and China's Peninsular Diplomacy,” Comparative Connections [Online], 7(3): 109–16. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0503q.pdf.Google Scholar
, , and (2005) “The Six-Party Talks: Developing a Roadmap for Future Progress,” Issues & Insights 5(8): 1–28.Google Scholar
(2002) “A Russian View of the Future Korean Peninsula,” in , ed., The Future of North Korea, New York: Routledge, pp. 129–46Google Scholar
(1998) “Lengzhan hou DongbeiYa anquan xingshe de bianhua [Changes in the Post-Cold War Northeast Asian Security Situation],” Xiandai guoji guanxi [Contemporary International Relations], 9, 34–38.Google Scholar
(1988) Enter the Dragon: China's Undeclared War Against the U.S. in Korea, 1950–1951, New York: Newmarket Press.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2001) SIPRI Yearbook 2001: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, New York: Oxford University Press.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2002) SIPRI Yearbook 2002: Armament, Disarmament and International Security, New York: Oxford University Press.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2004) SIPRI Yearbook 2004: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, New York: Oxford University Press.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2005) SIPRI Yearbook 2005: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, New York: Oxford University Press.
(1995) The Korean War: An International History, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1967) The Korean Communist Movement 1918–1948, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) “The Prospects for Change in North Korea,” Korea and World Affairs, 17(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
(2006) “Imbalance of Power, Balance of Asymmetric Terror: Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) in Korea,” in , ed., The Future of U.S.-Korean Relations, New York: Routledge, pp. 64–80.Google Scholar
(1999/2000) “Provisional Stabilities: The Politics of Identities in Post-Soviet Eurasia,” International Security, 24(3), 139–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Playing by the Rules in Korea: Lessons Learned in the North-South Economic Engagement,” Asia Survey, 43(2), 305–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (1972) Theory and Policy in International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) After the Empire: The Breakdown of the American Order, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Russia and North Korea,” in , ed., The Future of North Korea, New York: Routledge, pp. 147–56Google Scholar
(2003b) “President Putin's Korea Policy,” The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 17(1), 23–51.Google Scholar
(1998) “Conflicting ‘Homeland Myths’ and Nation-State Building in Postcommunist Russia,” Slavic Review 57 (2), 267–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (1999) Human Development Report 1999, New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2004) Human Development Report 2004, New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2005). Human Development Report 2005, New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2003) State of the Environment DPR Korea 2003 [Online]. Available at http://www.unep.org/PDF/DPRK_SOE_Report.pdf.
United States Department of Defense (1990) A Strategic Framework for the Asian Pacific Rim: Looking Towards the Twenty-first Century, Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
United States Department of Defense (2001) Quadrennial Defense Review Report (QDRR 2001), September 30, p. 2. Available at http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/qdr2001.pdf.
(1987) “Foreign Policy, Learning, and War,” in , , and , eds., New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston: Allen & Unwin, pp. 366–83Google Scholar
(1992) “World Politics Theory,” in and , eds., Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, Vol. 2, New York: Routledge, pp. 839–61Google Scholar
(1971) “Sequences and Development,” in Leonard Binder et al., eds., Crises and Sequences in Political Development, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1967) The Inequality of States: A Study of the Small Power in International Relations, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Russia and the Korean Peninsula: Contemporary Realities and Prospects,” Far Eastern Affairs, 30(3)Google Scholar
(1992) Kim Il-song kwa Manchu hanil chonchaeng [Kim Il Sung and the Manchurian Resistance War Against Japan], Yi Chong-sok, trans., Seoul: Ch'angchak kwapi pyongsa.
(1996) “The Sources of Russian Conduct: Theories, Frameworks, and Approaches,” in , ed., The Sources of Russian Foreign Policy after the Cold War, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
and (1993) “Armed Conflict at the End of the Cold War, 1989–92,” Journal of Peace Research, 30, 331–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001) “Armed Conflict, 1989–2001,” Journal of Peace Research, 38(5), 629–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “International Relations: One World, Many Theories,” Foreign Policy, 110, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Evaluating Theories,” American Political Science Review, 91(4), 913–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “China and Korean Unification: A Policy of Status Quo,” Korea and World Affairs, 22, 177–98Google Scholar
(1999) “Joining the Major Powers for the Status Quo: China's Views and Policy on Korean Reunification,” Pacific Affairs, 72, 167–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Territorial Disputes and Asian Security: Sources, Management, and Prospects,” in , ed., Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 380–423.Google Scholar
(1999) “Mianxiang ershi shiji de Zhongguo waijiao: sanzhong xuqiu de xunqiu jiqi pinghem [China's Diplomacy for the 21st Century: Seeking and Balancing Three Demands],” Zhanlue yu guanli [Strategy and Management], 6, 18–27.Google Scholar
, ed. Construction Within Contradictions: Multiple Perspectives on the Relationship Between China and International Organizations, Beijing: China Development Publishing House.
(1995) “To Attack, or Not to Attack? Stalin, Kim Il Sung, and the Prelude to War,” Bulletin of Cold War International History Project, 5, 1–9.Google Scholar
(1996) “New Russian Documents on the Korean War: Introduction and Translations,” Bulletin of Cold War International History Project, 6–7, 30–84.Google Scholar
(1968) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, in H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, eds., New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1986) Society and Identity: Toward a Sociological Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987) “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Security, 41, 335–70Google Scholar
(1992) “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, 46, 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review, 88, 384–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “Constructing International Politics,” International Security, 20(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Social Theory of International Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) “Review of Rossiia I Koreia v geopolitike evrazeiskogo vostoka [Russia and Korea in the Geopolitics of the Eurasian East] by Vladimir Li,” Northeast Asia Peace and Security Network, Special ReportGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Mending Fences: Moscow's China Policy from Brezhnev to Yeltsin, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Russian-North Korean Relations: A New Era?” in Samuel S. Kim and Tai Hwan Lee, eds., North Korea and Northeast Asia, New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 139–62Google Scholar
(2004) “Russia in Inter-Korean Relations,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 117–38Google Scholar
, , and (2004) Going Critical: The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
(1993) The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1994/95) “Realism and the End of the Cold War,” International Security, 19(2), 91–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security, 24(1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Long-Term Economic and Military Trends, 1994–2015: The United States and Asia, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
and (2005) North Korean Paradoxes: Circumstances, Costs, and Consequences of Korean Unification, Santa Monica, CA: Rand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank (1991) World Development Report 1991, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (1996) World Development Report 1996, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (1997) World Development Report 1997, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (1999) World Development Report 1998/99, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2001) World Development Report 2000/2001, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2002) World Development Report 2002, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2003a) World Development Report 2003, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2003b) World Development Report 2004, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2004) World Development Report 2005, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2005) World Development Report 2006, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Food Programme (2005a) “WFP DPR Korea EMOP 10141.3 Emergency Food World Food Programme Assistance to Vulnerable Groups.” Available at http://www.wfp.org/operations/current_operations/project_docs/101413.pdf).
World Food Programme (2005b) “Update on Korea, Democratic Republic,” May 18
(2004) “Policy Recommendations for Japan: Unification of the Korean Peninsula,” Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies.
(1995) “Lengzhan hou Zhongguo de duiwai anquan zhanlüe [China's post-Cold War External Security Strategy],” Xiandai guoji guanxi [Contemporary International Relations], 8, 23–29.Google Scholar
and (1995) “Zhanwang xia shiji chu guoji zhengzhi [Prospects for International Politics in the Beginning of the Next Century],” Xiandai guoji guanxi [Contemporary International Relations], 6, 2–8.Google Scholar
(1994) “Dui Dong Ya anquan wenti de fenxi [An Analysis of the East Asian Security Problem],” Guoji wenti yanjiu [International Studies], 3, 19–22.Google Scholar
, , and (2004) “Russo-North Korean Relations in the 2000s: Moscow's Continuing Search for Regional Influence,” Asian Survey, 44(6), 794–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “China's Korea Policy: From ‘One Korea’ to ‘Two Koreas,’” Asian Affairs, 22(2), 119–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “North Korean Defectors Abroad and in South Korea,” Development and Security, 30(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
(2006) Fragile Cooperation: Net Threat Theory and Japan-Korea-U.S. Relations, PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, Columbia University, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Chaoxian bandao xingshi de fazhan yu qianjing [The Evolving Situation and Future Prospects of the Korean Peninsula],” Guoji wenti yanjiu [International Studies], 4, 12–16.Google Scholar
and (1990) “China's Decision to Enter the Korean War: History Revisited,” The China Quarterly, 121, 94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Russia in North Korean Foreign Policy,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America's World Role, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1994) Zhongguo Renmin Jiefang Jun [China's People's Liberation Army], Vol. 1, Contemporary China Series, Beijing: Dangdai Zhongguo Chubanshe.
(1998) “The Korean Peninsula and China's National Security: Past, Present, and Future,” Asian Perspective, 22, 259–72Google Scholar
(1997) “China's Korea Unification Policy,” in , ed., The Four Powers and Korean UnificationStrategies, Seoul: Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University, pp. 59–86Google ScholarPubMed
(2005) “The Bush Doctrine, Russia, and Korea,” in Mel Gurtov and Peter Van Ness, eds., Confronting the Bush Doctrine: Critical Views from the Asia-Pacific, New York: Routledge Curzon, pp. 130–52Google Scholar
(1998) “The Relationship Between TMD and the Global and Regional Security,” Guoji wenti yanjiu [International Studies], 1, 27–29.Google Scholar
(2003/04) “Will Asia's Past Be Its Future?” International Security, 28(3), 149–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1950) “Crisis in Asia: An Examination of United States Policy,” Department of State Bulletin, January 23, pp. 111–18. (Originally delivered on January 12, 1950 at the National Press Club.)Google Scholar
(2004) “ROK-Russia Summit to Boost Railway Link Project,” The Korea Times, September 21Google Scholar
Akaha, Tsuneo (2002) “Japan's Policy Toward North Korea: Interests and Options,” in , ed., The Future of North Korea, New York: Routledge, pp. 77–94Google Scholar
(1998) “Introduction,” in , ed. Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–24Google Scholar
Alagappa, Muthiah (2003) “Preface,” in , ed. Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. ⅸ–ⅹⅴGoogle Scholar
and (1977) “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics,” World Politics, 29(4), 489–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984) “The Decision to Ally: A Theory and Test,” Western Political Quarterly, 37(4), 523–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1913) The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to Their Economic and Social Advantage, 4th ed., New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
and (2001) “Japan and the Unification of Korea: Challenges for U.S. Policy Coordination,” in Nicholas Eberstadt and , eds., Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 125–63Google Scholar
Armstrong, Charles K. (1998) “‘A Socialism of Our Style’: North Korean Ideology in a Post-Communist Era,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–53Google Scholar
Armstrong, Charles K. (2001) “The Nature, Origins, and Development of the North Korean State,” in , ed., The North Korean System in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Palgrave, pp. 39–63Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (2006) Korea at the Center: Dynamics of Regionalism in Northeast Asia, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
(2001) “How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict,” International Security, 26(1), 93–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) “Upping the Ante for Kim Jong Il: Pentagon Plan 5030, A New Blueprint for Facing Down North Korea,” U.S. News & World Report, July 21, p. 21.Google Scholar
(2002) American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) “Assessing the Politics of the Korean War, 1949–51,” Bulletin of Cold War International History Project, 5.Google Scholar
(1979) “Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends Versus Old Tendencies,” World Politics, 31, 161–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) Jihad vs. McWorld: How the Planet is Both Falling Apart and Coming Together and What This Means for Democracy, New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
(1996) Contemporary American Relations with North Korea: 1987–1994, PhD dissertation, Woodrow Wilson Department of Government and Foreign Affairs, University of Virginia, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
(1971) “The External Relations of Small States,” in August Schou and Arne Olav Bruntland, eds., Small States in International Relations, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell, pp. 39–56Google Scholar
Bazhanov, Evgeny P. (2000a) “Russia's Policies Toward the Two Koreas,” in , ed., The Two Koreas and the United States, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 147–65Google Scholar
(2000b) “Russian Views of the Agreed Framework and the Four-Party Talks,” in James Clay Moltz and , eds., The North Korean Nuclear Program: Security, Strategy and New Perspectives from Russia, New York: Routledge, pp. 219–35Google Scholar
(2006) “Korea in Russia's Post Cold War Regional Political Context,” in , Gilbert Rozman, , and Stephen Kotkin, eds., Korea at the Center: Dynamics of Regionalism in Northeast Asia, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 214–26Google Scholar
and (1994) “The Evolution of Russian-Korean Relations,” Asian Survey, 34(9), 789–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “Sino-Korean Relations: Triangle of Tension, or Balancing a Divided Peninsula?” International Journal, 50, 516–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1977) Constructing Alternative World Futures: Reordering the Planet, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.Google Scholar
. (1993) “From Sword to Chrysanthemum: Japan's Culture of Anti-Militarism,” International Security, 17(4), 119–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Set for Stability? Prospects for Conflict and Cooperation in East Asia,” Review of International Studies, 26(3), 405–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “The Construction of Antagonism: The History Problem in Japan's Foreign Relations,” in and , eds. Reinventing the Alliance: US-Japan Security Partnership in an Era of Change, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63–88.Google Scholar
Berger, Thomas U. (2004) “Japan's International Relations: The Political and Security Dimensions,” in , ed., The International Relations of Northeast Asia, Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 135–69.Google Scholar
(2005a) “The Politics of Memory in Japanese Foreign Relations,” Unpublished manuscript, Department of International Relations, Boston University, Boston
(2005b) “Of Shrines and Hooligans: The Structure of the History Problem in East Asia after 9/11,” Unpublished manuscript, Department of International Relations, Boston University, Boston
(1993/94) “Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States After the Cold War,” International Security, 18(3), 34–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) “China-Russia Relations: Presidential Politicking and Proactive Posturing,” Comparative Connections [Online], 6(1), 125–36. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0401q.pdf.Google Scholar
., eds. (1971) Crises and Sequences in Political Development, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) “Identity, Difference, and the Dilemmas of Inter-Korean Relations: Insights from Northern Defectors and the German Precedent,” Asian Perspective, 28(2), 35–63.Google Scholar
(2005) Divided Korea: Toward a Culture of Reconciliation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Japan and Korea in the 1990s: From Antagonism to Adjustment, Bookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
and (2000/01) “Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for Ideas,” International Security, 25(3), 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
and (1992) War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) “A Long-Term Strategy for North Korea,” Japan Focus [Online], February 15. Available at http://japanfocus.org/article.asp?id=222.Google Scholar
and (1994) Critical Mass: The Dangerous Race for Superweapons in a Fragmenting World, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
(1994) The Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
(1991) People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd ed., Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
(1999) The Guerilla Dynasty: Politics and Leadership in North Korea, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
, ed. (1996) Zhongguo da zhanlue: lingdao shijie da lantu [China's Grand Strategy: A Blueprint for World Leadership], Haikou, China: Hainan chubanshe.Google Scholar
(1989) “The North Pacific Triangle: Sources of Economic and Political Transformation,” Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, 8, 3–17.Google Scholar
(1958) The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
and (1999) Preventive Defense: A New Security Strategy for America, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
(1997) “Korean Unification: The Zero-Sum Past and the Precarious Future,” Asian Perspective, 21(3), 63–92.Google Scholar
(1999a) Alignment Despite Antagonism: The United States-Korea-Japan Security Triangle, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999b) “Engaging China: Seoul-Beijing Détente and Korean Security,” Survival, 41, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a) “Japan's Grand Strategy on the Korean Peninsula: Optimistic Realism,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, 1(2), 249–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) “The Security Domain of South Korea's Globalization,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 217–41Google Scholar
(2001a) “Japan-Korea Relations: Ending 2000 with a Whimper, Not a Bang,” Comparative Connections [Online], 2(4), 88–93. Available at www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0401q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2001b) “Japan-Korea Relations: History Haunts, Engagement Dilemmas” Comparative Connections [Online], 3(1), 104–12. Available at www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0101q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2001c) “Japan–Korea Relations: Quicksand,” Comparative Connections [Online], 3(3): 101–07. Available at www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0103q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2003) “South Korea: Anchored or Adrift?” in Richard J. Ellings and , eds. Strategic Asia 2003–04: Fragility and Crisis, Seattle: The National Bureau of Asian Research, pp. 109–30Google Scholar
and (2003) Nuclear North Korea: A Debate on Engagement Strategies, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Imperial America and the Common Interest,” World Policy Journal, Spring, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War Ⅱ, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
(1993) “Beijing's Policy Toward Korea and PRC-ROK Normalization of Relations,” in Manwoo Lee and , eds., The Changing Order in Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula, Seoul: The Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University, pp. 155–72Google Scholar
(1974) “Russian Designs on the Far East,” in , ed., Russian Imperialism from Ivan the Great to the Revolution, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
(1993a) “The Role of the Great Powers in the Process of Korean Reunification,” in , ed., Korean Unification: Implications for Northeast Asia, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, pp. 59–79Google Scholar
(1993b) “New Approaches in China's Foreign Policy: The Post-Cold War Era,” Asian Survey, 33(3), 237–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chicago Council on Foreign Relations (2004) Global Views 2004: Comparing South Korean and American Public Opinion and Foreign Policy, Chicago: Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
(1967) Korea in World Politics 1940–1950: An Evaluation of American Responsibility, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1992) “Threats, Assurances, and the Last Chance for Peace: The Lessons of Mao's Korean War Telegrams,” International Security, 17(1), 122–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) “Posing Problems Without Catching Up: China's Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy,” International Security, 25(4), 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1999) Russia and Asia: The Emerging Security Agenda, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) “The Cold War and Its Transition for Koreans: The Meaning from a Constructivist Viewpoint,” in Chung-in Moon, Odd Arne Westad, and Gyoo-hyoung Kahng, eds., Ending the Cold War in Korea: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 115–45Google Scholar
(1968) “Sino-Korean Tributary Relations in the Ch'ing Period,” in , ed., The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 90–111Google Scholar
and (1997) “The Russian Federation and South Korea,” in Stephen J. Blank and , eds., Imperial Decline: Russia's Changing Role in Asia, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 185–210.Google Scholar
(1977) North Korea and the United States, 1955–1972: A Study of North Korea’s Hostility Toward the United States, PhD dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
(1999) “Limitations of South Korea-China Military Cooperation,” Korea Focus, 7(5), 97–9Google Scholar
(1993) “The Political Economy of South Korea-China Bilateralism: Origins, Progress, and Prospects,” in Ilpyong Kim and Hong Pyo Lee, eds., Korea and China in a New World: Beyond Normalization, Seoul: The Sejong Institute, pp. 257–309Google Scholar
(2001) “South Korea Between Eagle and Dragon: Perceptual Ambivalence and Strategic Dilemma,” Asian Survey, 41(5), 777–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Cost Sharing for USFK in Transition: Whither the ROK-U.S. Alliance?” in , , Patrick Morgan, and Andrew Scobell, eds., Recalibrating the U.S.-Republic of Korea Alliance, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, pp. 35–53Google Scholar
(1987) Embattled Korea: The Rivalry for International Support, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(1978) “A Nation Is a Nation, Is a State, Is an Ethnic Group, Is a …,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1(4), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) “The Rajin-Sonbong Free Trade Zone Experiment: North Korea in Pursuit of New International Linkage,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 212–34Google Scholar
Council on Foreign Relations (1999a, July) U.S. Policy Toward North Korea: A Second Look [Online], Task Force Report No. 24, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press. Available at http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=3205.
Council on Foreign Relations (1999b, October) Safeguarding Prosperity in a Global Financial System: The Future International Financial Architecture, Task Reforce Report No. 25, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
Council on Foreign Relations (2003) Meeting the North Korean Nuclear Challenge: Report of an Independent Task Force Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
, , and (2004) Taming Intractable Conflicts: Mediation in the Hardest Cases, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
(2000) “Identity and Persuasion: How Nations Remember Their Pasts and Make Their Futures,” World Politics, 52(3), 275–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981) The Origins of the Korean War: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes 1945–1947, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1984) “The Political Economy of China's Turn Outward,” in , ed., China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy in the Post-Mao Era, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 235–65Google Scholar
(1990) The Origins of the Korean War, Vol. Ⅱ: The Roaring of the Cataract 1947–1950, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) “Anti-Americanism in the Republic of Korea,” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies, 14, 205–29Google Scholar
, , , , , and (1994) “Korea: Procedural and Jurisdictional Questions Regarding Possible Normalization of Relations with North Korea,” Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress 94–933, November 29
(1997) “Russia and the Problem of Korean Unification,” in , ed., The Four Powers and Korean Unification Strategies, Seoul: Institute for Far Eastern Studies, pp. 35–47Google Scholar
and , eds. (2005) China Rising: Power and Motivation in Chinese Foreign Policy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
(1998) “Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies,” International Security, 23(1), 141–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991) “Soviet Reform and the End of the Cold War: Explaining Large-Scale Historical Change,” Review of International Studies 17, 225–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Sino-Soviet Normalization and Its International Implications, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
(2004) “The Emerging Northeast Asian Regional Order,” in , ed. The International Relations of Northeast Asia. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 331–62.Google Scholar
and (1993a) “In Search of a Theory of National Identity,” in Lowell Dittmer and , eds., China's Quest for National Identity, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–31Google Scholar
and . (1993b) China's Quest for National Identity, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) “After the Summit: The Future of Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation,” East Asian Review, 13(2), 75–96.Google Scholar
(1983a) “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12, 205–35Google Scholar
(1983b) “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12, 323–53Google Scholar
(1984) The Empire of the Seas: A Biography of Rear Admiral Robert Wilson Shufeldt, USN, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
(1998a, October) “Special Report No. 38: Mistrust and the Korean Peninsula: Dangers of Miscalculation,” Washington, DC: U.S. Institute for Peace. Available at http://www.usip.org/pubs/specialreports/early/sr_korea.html.
(1998b) “The U.S. Role in Korean Reunification,” Korea and World Affairs, 22(2), 159–76Google Scholar
(1993) “North Korea: Reform, Muddling Through, or Collapse?” NBR Analysis, 4(3), 5–16.Google Scholar
(1994a) “Reform, Muddling Through, or Collapse?” in Thomas H. Henriksen and Lho Kyong-soo, eds., One Korea?, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
(1994b) “Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation: Rapprochement Through Trade?” Korea and World Affairs, 18, 642–61Google Scholar
(1994c) “Demographic Shocks After Communism: Eastern Germany, 1989–93,” Populations and Development Review, 20, 137–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995a) “China's Trade with the DPRK, 1990–1994: Pyongyang's Thrifty New Patron,” Korea and World Affairs, 19, 665–85Google Scholar
(1996) “How Much Money Goes from Japan to North Korea?” Asian Survey, 36, 523–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998a) “North Korea's Unification Policy: 1948–1996,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–57Google Scholar
(1998b) “North Korea's International Trade in Capital Goods, 1970–1995: Indications from Mirror Statistics,” Journal of East Asian Affairs, 13, 165–223.Google Scholar
(1998c) “U.S.-North Korea Economic Relations: Indications from North Korea's Past Trade Performance,” in , ed., The U.S. and the Two Koreas: A New Triangle, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 119–46.Google Scholar
(2004b) “Korean Scenarios Alternative Futures for the Korean Peninsula,” in Ashley J. Tellis and Michael Wills, eds., Strategic Asia 2004–05: Confronting Terrorism in the Pursuit of Power, Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research, pp. 428–55Google Scholar
and , eds. (2001) Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Offspring of Empire: The Koch'ang Kims and the Colonial Origins of Korean Capitalism, 1876–1945. Seattle: University of Washington PressGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (1991) Korea Old and New: A History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “The Empire Strikes Out: The ‘New Imperialism’ and Its Fatal Flaws,” Policy Analysis, 459, 1–27.Google Scholar
and , eds. (2002) Strategic Asia 2002–03: Asian Aftershocks, Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “Russia, Korea, and Northeast Asia,” in Nicholas Eberstadt and , eds., Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 164–87.Google Scholar
(1995) “The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in Its Own Backyard,” British Journal of Political Science, 25, 171–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1946) “Ego Development and Historical Change,” Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 2, 359–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1956) “The Problem of Ego Identity,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 4, 56–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1959) “Identity and the Life Cycle: Selected Papers by Erik H. Erikson,” Psychological Issues, 1, 1–171.Google Scholar
(1968) “Identity and Identity Diffusion,” in Chad Gordon and , eds., The Self in Social Interaction, New York: Wiley, pp. 197–205.Google Scholar
, ed. (1968) The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003, March 24) “Will the Empire Be Fascist?” Available at http://www.transnational.org/forum/meet/2003/Falk_FascistEmpire.html.
and (1982) An Approach to World Order Studies and the World System, New York: Institute for World Order.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (1982) Studies on a Just World Order, Vol. I: Toward a Just World Order, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (1991) Studies on a Just World Order, Vol. Ⅲ: The United Nations and a Just World Order, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(2003) North Korea South Korea: U.S. Policy at a Time of Crisis. New York: Seven Stories PressGoogle Scholar
(2005) “Korea's Slow-Motion Reunification,” Policy Forum Online 05–53A: June 28, 2005. Available at http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/0553Feffer.html.
(2006) “Grave Threats and Grand Bargains: The United States and Regional Order in Northeast Asia,” in , ed. The Future of U.S.-Korean Relations, New York: Routledge, pp. 178–99.Google Scholar
(2003) “Russia's Role on the Korean Peninsula and Great Power Relations in Northeast Asia: Ramifications for the U.S.-ROK Alliance,” NBR Analysis, 14(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
(2003) “The UN System as a Pathway to Security in Asia: A Buttress, Not a Pillar,” in , ed. Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 311–45.Google Scholar
(1992) Korea's Coming Unification, Economist Intelligence Unit M2, London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Google Scholar
(1994) “Korea: Sociopolitical Realities of Reuniting a Divided Nation,” in Thomas H. Hendricksen and Lho Kyong-soo, eds., One Korea? Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
(1998) “Regime Dynamics in North Korea: An European Perspective,” in , ed. Understanding Regime Dynamics in North Korea: Contending Perspectives and Comparative Implications, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 113–39.Google Scholar
(2003) “North Korea–South Korea Relations: Symbolic Links, Real Gaps,” Comparative Connections [Online], 5 (2), 91–100. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0302q.pdf.Google Scholar
(1993/94) “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia,” International Security, 18(3), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992/93) “International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War,” International Security, 17(3), 5–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976) “On the Future, Future Studies and Future Attitudes,” , H. Wiberg, A. Sicinski, , eds., Images of the World in the Year 2000: A Comparative Ten Nation Study, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, pp. 3–21Google Scholar
and (1995) “Looking Across the Yalu: Chinese Assessments of North Korea,” Asian Survey, 35(6), 528–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Sino-Russian Relations,” in , ed., China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 114–32Google Scholar
(1993) Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy, Arlington, VA: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
and , eds. (1958) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1981) War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Rising to the Challenge: China's Grand Strategy and International Security, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1993) Uncertain Partners: Stalin, Mao, and the Korean War, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
, ed. (1996) Remembering and Forgetting: The Legacy of War and Peace in East Asia, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Good Friends (1999) “The Report on Daily Life and Human Rights of North Korean Food Refugees in China” [Online]. Available at http://www.jungto.org/gf.
(1997) “North Korean Regime Crisis: U.S. Perspectives and Responses,” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 9, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000, July 31) “Why Tokyo Will Be a Larger Player in Asia,” Northeast Asia Peace And Security Network Special Report
(2001) Japan's Reluctant Realism: Foreign Policy Challenges in an Era of Uncertain Power, New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Japan and Globalization: From Opportunity to Restraint,” in , ed., East Asia and Globalization, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 55–79Google Scholar
(1998) Korea and Its Futures: Unification and the Unfinished War, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
(2005) “U.S.–Korea Relations: South Korea Confronts U.S. Hardliners on North Korea,” Comparative Connections [Online], 6(4), 47–57. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0404q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2002) “Common Security in North Korea: Quest for a New Paradigm in Inter-Korean Relations,” Asian Survey, 42(3), 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (2005) Confronting the Bush Doctrine: Critical Views from the Asia-Pacific. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
(1994) “Russo-North Korean Relations in Transition,” in , ed., Foreign Relations of North Korea During Kim Il Sung's Last Days, Seoul: Sejong Institute, pp. 331–55Google Scholar
(1986) “What Is Nationalism and Why Should We Study It?” International Organization, 40, 707–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Power and Tactics in International Negotiation: How Week Nations Bargain with Strong Nations, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1994) “Citizenship and National Identity,” in , ed., The Condition of Citizenship, London: Sage, pp. 20–35Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (1999). Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(1990) Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
and (2005) Hunger and Human Rights: The Politics of Famine in North Korea, Washington, DC: U.S. Committee for Human Rights in North Korea.Google Scholar
, , and (1997) “Japanese Colonialism and Korean Development: A Critique,” World Development, 25(6), 867–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001) “Remembering Japan and North Korea: The Politics of Memory in South Korea,” in , ed., Memory and History in East and Southeast Asia: Issues of Identity in International Relations, Washington, DC: CSIS Press, pp. 101–12.Google Scholar
(1999) National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1997) “Korean Reunification and the United States: A Futuristic and Speculative Assessment,” in Dalchoong Kim and Chung-in Moon, eds. History, Cognition, and Peace in East Asia, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 215–33.Google Scholar
(2004) “Korea and U.S. Culture: Cultural Interaction from a Korean Perspective,” Pacific Partners: Korean-American Relations in the Twenty-first Century. Proceedings of the Conference on Enhancing the Partnership Between Korea and the United States in the Twenty-First Century, The Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii, ManoaGoogle Scholar
(1993) “Fundamentals of Korea's New Diplomacy,” Korea and World Affairs, 17(2), 227–45Google Scholar
(1995) Segyehwa sidae ui Hankuk Oeykyo [Korean Diplomacy in an Era of Globalization], Seoul: Chisik Sangyopsa.Google Scholar
(1999) Samkak kwankyae ui taetong: Mikuk, Chungkuk kuriko Hanpanto [The Quickening of a Triangular Relations: The United States, China, and the Korean Peninsula], Kyekan Sasang [Quarterly Thought], 11, 29–70
and (1990) “China's Decision to Enter the Korean War: History Revisited,” The China Quarterly, 121, 94–115.Google Scholar
(1995) “The New Regime in North Korea and Its Future: Principal Scenarios,” in The Future of North Korea: Implications for the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia, Seoul: The Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security, pp. 21–37Google Scholar
(1996) Japan's Nuclear Future: The Plutonium Debate and East Asian Security, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
(1998b) “U.S. Policy Toward North Korea,” in Dae-Suk Suh and Chae Jin Lee, eds., North Korea After Kim Il Sung, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 61–83Google Scholar
(2002) Korean Endgame: A Strategy for Reunification and U.S. Disengagement, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: A Proposal by the Task Force on U.S. Korea Policy, Chicago: The Center for International Policy and the Center for East Asian Studies, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
(2001) “The PRC-DPRK Rapprochement and China's Dilemma in Korea,” Asian Perspective, 25(3), 247–59Google Scholar
(1998) Korea: Division, Reunification, and U.S. Foreign Policy, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
(2002/03) “The Effects of Korean Unification on the U.S. Military Presence in Northeast Asia,” Parameters, Winter, 120–32Google Scholar
(1992) What Is Asia to Us? Russia's Asian Heartland Yesterday and Today, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1988) “American Nuclear Hegemony in Korea,” Journal of Peace Research, 25(4), 351–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Pacific Powderkeg: American Nuclear Dilemmas in Korea, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
(1993b) “The Republic of Korea and the Nuclear Issue,” in , ed., Asian Flashpoint, Canberra, Australia: Allen & Unwin, pp. 51–83Google Scholar
(1994c) “Should the United States Supply Light-Water Reactors to Pyongyang?” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 6, 179–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Bush's Bipolar Disorder and the Looming Failure of Multilateral Talks with North Korea,” Arms Control Toda, 33(8), 3–6.Google Scholar
(1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
and (1998) “Mercantile Realism and Japanese Foreign Policy,” International Security, 22(4), 171–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). “Korea,” in Gregory Henderson, Richard Ned Lebow, and , eds. Divided Nations in a Divided World, New York: McKay, pp. 43–96Google Scholar
(1980) National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Exp. ed., Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2003) “The High and the Mighty: Bush's National-Security Strategy and the New American Hubris,” The American Prospect, January 13, 28–31.Google Scholar
(1996) The State, War, and the State of War, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Thawing Korea's Cold War: The Path to Peace on the Korean Peninsula,” Foreign Affairs, 78, 8–12.Google Scholar
(1975) A Politics of Identity: Liberation and the Natural Community, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
(1998) “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory,” International Security, 23(1), 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) “Beijing's Defense Strategy and the Korean Peninsula,” Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, 14, 50–67.Google Scholar
(1999) Japan's Economic Power and Security: Japan and North Korea, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
(1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
(1998) Pukhan ui chinsil kwa hwi [North Korea's Truth and Lies], Seoul: Institute of National Unification Policy.Google Scholar
(1999) Nanun yoksaui chili rul poattda [I Have Witnessed Historical Truth], Seoul: Hanul.Google Scholar
(2003b) “The Challenges of American Imperial Power,” Naval War College Review, 56(2), 53–63.Google Scholar
(2004) “Illusions of Empire: Defining the New American Order,” Foreign Affairs, 83(2), 144–54Google Scholar
and (2003a) International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
and (2003b) “Conclusion: Images of Order in the Asia-Pacific and the Role of the United States,” in and , eds., International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 421–39Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (1997) “Armed Conflicts and Fatalities 1945–1994,” The Military Balance, 1997–1998, London: IISS.
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2001) The Military Balance, 2001–2002. London: IISS.
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2002) The Military Balance, 2002–2003. New York: Oxford University Press
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2004) The Military Balance, 2004–2005, New York: Oxford University Press.
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2005) The Military Balance, 2005–2006. New York: Oxford University Press
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1992) 1992 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1993) 1993 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1994) 1994 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1995) 1995 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1996) 1996 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1997) 1997 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1998) 1998 Direction of Trade Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF.
and (2001). “Remembering Japan and North Korea: The Politics of Memory in South Korea,” in , ed., Memory and History in East and Southeast Asia: Issues of Identity in International Relations. Washington, DC: CSIS Press, pp. 101–12.Google Scholar
(1990) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2004) Diplomatic Bluebook 2004. Tokyo: Government of Japan. Available at http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/other/bluebook/2004/index.html.
, , and (1996) “Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security,” in , ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 33–75Google Scholar
(1976) Perceptions and Misperceptions in International Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1980) “The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 563–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991/92) “The Future of World Politics: Will It Resemble the Past?” International Security, 16(3), 39–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Theories of War in an Era of Leading-Power Peace,” American Political Science Review, 96(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) “China and North Korea: A Fragile Relationship of Strategic Convenience,” Journal of Contemporary China, 10(28), 387–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) “The PLA, the CCP and the Formulation of Chinese Defense and Foreign Policy,” in and , eds., Power and Responsibility in Chinese Foreign Policy, Canberra, Australia: Asia Pacific Press, pp. 105–131.Google Scholar
and (1992) “China's Policy Toward the Korean Peninsula,” Asian Survey, 32(12), 1137–56Google Scholar
(2004) The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
(2005) “The Real ‘China Threat’,” Asia Times [Online], March 19. Available at http://www.atimes.com/korea.html.Google Scholar
(1995) Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) “China's Militarized Interstate Dispute Behaviour 1949–1992: A First Cut at the Data,” China Quarterly, 153, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Socialization in International Institutions: The ASEAN Way and International Relations Theory,” in and , eds., International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 107–62Google Scholar
(2004) “China's International Relations: The Political and Security Dimensions,” in , ed., The International Relations of Northeast Asia, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 65–100Google Scholar
and (1999) “China's Engagement with Multilateral Security Institutions,” in Alastair Iain Johnston and , eds., Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power, New York: Routledge, pp. 235–72Google Scholar
, , , and (2001). “Treating Identity as a Variable,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, August 30–September 2
(1998) “Russia and Korea,” in Bae-ho Hahn and Chae-jin Lee, eds., The Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers, Seoul: The Sejong Institute.Google Scholar
(2000a) “DPRK-Russian Rapprochement and Its Implications for Korean Security,” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 6, 193–223.Google Scholar
(2000b) Gorbachev's Foreign Policy Toward the Korean Peninsula, 1985–1991, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellon.Google Scholar
(2001) “The New Friendship Treaty Between Moscow and Pyongyang,” Comparative Strategy, 20(5), 467–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Russia and the Korean Peace Process,” in Tae-Hwan Kwak and Seung-Ho Joo, eds., The Korean Peace Process and the Four Powers, Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 143–70.Google Scholar
and , eds. (2002) Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy, San Francisco: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
and (1967) The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2004) “Japan in Inter-Korean Relations,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97–116Google Scholar
and (2000) “Japanese Security and Peace Regime on the Korean Peninsula,” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 9(1), 117–35Google Scholar
(2005a) “Japan–Korea Relations: History Impedes the Future,” Comparative Connections [Online], 7(1), 123–32. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0501q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2005b) “Japan: U.S. Partner or Focused on Abductees?” The Washington Quarterly, 28(4), 107–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005) “Japan–Korea Relations: Little Progress on North Korea or History Dispute,” Comparative Connections [Online], 7(2), 133–42. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0502q.pdf.Google Scholar
(1995) “Is Realism Dead? The Domestic Sources of International Politics,” International Organization, 49(4), 751–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
and (2001/02) “Japan, Asia-Pacific Security, and the Case of Analytical Eclecticism,” International Security, 26(3), 153–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) “How Did the Cold War Die? Principles for an Autopsy,” Mershon International Studies Review, 38, 11–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
, , and (2003) “The Reluctant Empire: In a Time of Great Consequence,” Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(1), 11–31.Google Scholar
(1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1996) “Normalization and After: Prospects for the Sino-South Korean Relations,” Korean and World Affairs, 20, 572–80Google Scholar
(1987) “The Lessons of Korea and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965,” in , , and , eds., New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston: Allen & Unwin, pp. 302–49Google Scholar
(1992) Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) “North Korea and the United Nations,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 258–79Google Scholar
and , eds. (1997) Peace and Security in Northeast Asia: The Nuclear Issue and the Korean Peninsula, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
(2004) “The Challenges of Peacefully Reunifying the Korean Peninsula,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave, pp. 197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1967) Korea and the Politics of Imperialism, 1876–1910, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1996) “The Uncertain Future of North Korea: Soft Landing or Crash Landing?” Korea and World Affairs, 20(4), 623–36Google Scholar
and . (1997) History, Cognition, and Peace in East Asia, Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
(1990) “International Trends in Korean War Studies: A Review of the Documentary Literature,” Korea and World Affairs, 14(2), 326–46Google Scholar
(1993) Korea's Relations with Her Neighbors in a Changing World, Elizabeth, NJ: Holly.Google Scholar
(1998). “Japan in North Korean Foreign Policy,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 116–39.Google Scholar
(2006) “Japanese-North Korean Relations Under the Koizumi Government,” in Hong Nack Kim and Young Whan Kihl, eds., North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 161–82.Google Scholar
(1994) “The Soviet Union/Russia and Korea: Dynamics of ‘New Thinking,’” in , ed., Korea and the World: Beyond the Cold War, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 83–95Google Scholar
(1975) Divided Korea: The Politics of Development, 1945–72, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980) The Last Phase of the East Asian World Order, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1996) “No Way Out: North Korea's Impending Collapse,” Harvard International Review, 18(2), 22–71.Google Scholar
(1976) “The Developmental Problems of Korean Nationalism,” in Se-Jin Kim and Chang-hyun Cho, eds., Korea: A Divided Nation, Silver Spring, MD: The Research Institute on Korean Affairs, pp. 10–37Google Scholar
(1979) China, the United Nations, and World Order, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1980/81) “United States Korean Policy and World Order,” Alternatives: A Journal of World Policy, 6, 419–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) “North Korea and the Non-Communist World: The Quest for National Identity,” in Chong-Sik Lee and Se-Hee Yoo, eds., North Korea in Transition, Berkeley: Center for Korean Studies, Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California at Berkeley, pp. 17–42Google Scholar
(1995) “North Korea in 1994: Brinkmanship, Breakdown and Breakthrough,” Asian Survey, 35(1), 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) “Puk-Mi hyopsang kwa Pukhan ui chunryak” [DPRK-US Negotiations and North Korea's Strategy], in Kwak Tae-hwan, ed., Pukhan ui Hyopsang Chunryak kwa NamPukhan Kwangkye [North Korea's Negotiating Strategy and South-North Relations], Seoul: Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University, pp. 163–86Google Scholar
(1997c) “North Korea and the United Nations,” International Journal of Korean Studies, 1, 77–105.Google Scholar
ed. (1998a) North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998b) “In Search of a Theory of North Korean Foreign Policy,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–31Google Scholar
(1998c) “Chinese Foreign Policy in Theory and Practice,” in , ed. China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
(1999) “China and the United Nations,” in and , eds., China Joins the World: Progress and Prospects, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, pp. 42–89Google Scholar
(2000a) “Korea and Globalization (Segyehwa): A Framework for Analysis,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–28Google Scholar
(2000b) “Korea's Globalization Drive: Promise Versus Performance,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242–81Google Scholar
(2000c) “North Korean Informal Politics,” in Lowell Dittmer, Haruhiro Fukui, and Peter N. S. Lee, eds. Informal Politics in East Asia, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237–68Google Scholar
(2001) “The Making of China's Korea Policy in the Era of Reform,” in , ed. The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 371–408.Google Scholar
(2004a) “Introduction: Managing the Korean Conflict,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) “China's New Role in the Nuclear Confrontation,” Asian Perspective, 28(4), 147–84Google Scholar
(2004c) “China in World Politics,” in and , eds., Does China Matter? A Reassessment, New York: Routledge, pp. 37–53Google Scholar
(2004d) “Regionalization and Regionalism in East Asia,” Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(1), 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ed. (2004e) The International Relations of Northeast Asia. Lanha, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
and (1993) “Whither China's Quest for National Identity?” in Lowell Dittmer and , eds., China's Quest for National Identity, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 237–90Google Scholar
and (2004) “Conflict Management,” in and , eds., Encyclopaedia of Government and Politics, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, New York: Routledge, pp. 980–93Google Scholar
and (2004) “Inter-Korean Economic Relations,” in , ed., Inter Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Korean Views on the Taiwan-PRC Relations and the Japan Factor,” in James R. Lilley and Chuck Downs, eds., Crisis in the Taiwan Strait, Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, pp. 303–25Google Scholar
(1999) “Strategic Relations Between Beijing and Pyongyang: Growing Strains amid Lingering Ties,” in James R. Lilley and David Shambaugh, eds., China's Military Faces the Future, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 295–321Google Scholar
(1984) The Foreign Policy Systems of North and South Korea, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1994) “Prospects for Change in North Korea,” Korean Journal of National Unification, 3, 237–55Google Scholar
(1998) “Japan and Korea,” in Bae-ho Hahn and Chae-jin Lee, eds. The Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers, Seoul: Sejong Institute, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar
(2000) “Segyehwa, the Republic of Korea, and the United Nations,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 196–216Google Scholar
, , , , and (1977) Pukhan Oekyo-ron [On North Korea's Foreign Policy], Seoul: Kyungnam University Press.
(1994) “Where Do High Growth Political Economies Come From? The Japanese Lineage of Korea's ‘Developmental State,’” World Development, 22(9), 1269–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Russia's National Identity: Foreign Policy Dimension,” International Affairs [Moscow], 49(4), 97–106.Google Scholar
(1995) Hankuk ui Kukka yiyik [Korea's National Interest], Seoul: Pommunsa.
(2003) “The Russian Federation and the Two Korean States: Economic Cooperation the Early 21 Century,” The Seinan Law Review 35 (3–4), 95–128.Google Scholar
(1998) “Agent Versus Structure in the Construction of National Identity,” in Vendulka Kubalkova, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert, eds., International Relations in a Constructed World, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 101–22.Google Scholar
(1993) “The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik Without Politics,” Review of International Studies, 19, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (1996) Identities in International Relations, New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “The American Empire and the Islamic Challenge,” The Weekly Standard, 7(9), 25.Google Scholar
(1996) “Threat Environment for a United Korea: 2010,” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 8, 84–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) The End of the American Era: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
and (2004) The U.S.-China Relationship Facing International Security Crises: Three Case Studies in Post-9/11 Bilateral Relations, Washington, DC: The Nixon Center.Google Scholar
(1996) “North and South Korea: Beyond Deterrence,” Speech delivered to the Asia Society Corporate Conference, Seoul, Korea, May 11
(2004a) “Cold War Alienates Seoul, Moscow,” The Korea Times, September 17 [Online] Available at http://times.hankooki.com.Google Scholar
(2004b) “North Korean Refugees in Northeast China,” Asian Survey, 44(6), 856–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Integrating China into the Global Economy, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
, , and (2004) Ambivalent Allies?: A Study of South Korean Attitudes Toward the U.S.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, March.Google Scholar
(1981) Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 57–97Google Scholar
(1994) “The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism,” International Organization, 48, 249–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998a) “The Evolution of China's Two Korea Policy,” in Bae-ho Hahn and Chae-jin Lee, eds., The Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers, Seoul: Sejong Institute, pp. 115–46Google Scholar
(1998b) “China and North Korea,” in Dae-sook Suh and Chae-jin Lee, eds., North Korea After Kim Il-Sung, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 165–209.Google Scholar
and (1981) Koreans in Japan: Ethnic Conflict and Accommodation, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1985) Japan and Korea: The Political Dimension, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
(2000) “Development of North Korea's Legal Regime Governing Foreign Business Cooperation: A Revisit Under the New Socialist Constitution of 1998,” Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 21(1), 199–242.Google Scholar
(2001) PukHan-Chungkuk Kwan Kyae 1945–2000 [DPRK-PRC Relations, 1945–2000]. Seoul: Jungsim.
(1999a) “Preventing Refugee Crisis: A Challenge to Human Security,” Asian Perspective, 23, 133–54Google Scholar
(1999a) “Responses to North Korean Food Refugees,” Security Dialogue 30, 122–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) “International Organizations and the Inter-Korean Peace Process: Traditional Security Versus Nontraditional Security,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–96.Google Scholar
(2004) “The Roots and Patterns of Anti-Americanism in Korean Society: A Survey-Based Analysis,” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies, 14, 183–204.Google Scholar
(1982) The United States and the Division of Korea, 1945, Seoul: Kyunghee University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “The Cost and Financing of Korean Unification,” in Sung-Hee Jwa, Chung-in Moon, and Jeong-Ho Roh, eds., Constitutional Handbook on Korean Unification, Part Ⅲ, Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute, pp. 1125–61.Google Scholar
and (1997) “Unified Korea and New Strategies for National Survival,” in Dalchoong Kim and Chung-in Moon, eds., History, Cognition, and Peace in East Asia, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 177–99.Google Scholar
(1999) “The Three Russias: Decline, Revolution, and Reconstruction,” in , ed., A Century's Journey: How the Great Powers Shape the World, New York: Basic Books, pp. 139–90.Google Scholar
(2001) “Theories of Interstate and Intrastate War: A Levels-of-Analysis Approach,” in , Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, eds., Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, pp. 3–27Google Scholar
(2000a) “North Korea and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime,” in James Clay Moltz and , eds., The North Korean Nuclear Program, New York: Routledge, pp. 138–55Google Scholar
(2000b) Rossiya I Koreya v geopolitike evraziiskogo vostoka (xx vek) [Russia and Korea in the Geopolitics of the Eurasian East (20th century)], Moscow: Nauchnaya Kniga.
(1962) Nations in Alliance: Limits of Interdependence, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Rogue States and U.S. Foreign Policy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
(2001) “What's in a Name? The Changing Foreign Policy Lexicon,” Journal of International Affairs, 54(2), 375–92Google Scholar
(2003) “Non-Proliferation and the Dilemmas of Regime Change,” Survival, 45(4), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (1994) Zhongguo dui Chaoxian he Hanguo zhengci wenjian huibian 5 (1974–1994) [A Collection of Documents on China's Policy toward the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea, Vol. 5 (1974–1994)], Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
(2003) “China and the North Korean Crisis: Facing Test and Transition,” Pacific Affairs, 76(3), 347–73Google Scholar
and , eds. (1993) The Cold War and After: Prospects for Peace, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1992) U.S-Korean Relations from Liberation to Self-Reliance: The Twenty-Year Record: An Interpretative Summary of the Archives of the U.S. Department of State for the Period 1945 to 1965, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(1975) “Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict,” World Politics, 27(2), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “The Reluctant Imperialist: Terrorism, Failed States and the Case for American Empire,” Foreign Affairs, 81(2), 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “United States-North Korean Relations: From Welfare to Workfare?” in Samuel S. Kim and Tai Hwan Lee, eds., North Korea and Northeast Asia, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 61–88Google Scholar
(1995) “The Origins, Evolution, and Current Politics of the North Korean Nuclear Program,” Nonproliferation Review, 2(3), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a) “The Natural Disasters of the Mid-1990s and the Their Impact on the Implementation of the Agreed Framework,” in James Clay Moltz and , eds., The North Korean Nuclear Program, New York: Routledge, pp. 76–90Google Scholar
(2000b) “North Korea's Negotiations with the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO),” in James Clay Moltz and , eds., The North Korean Nuclear Program, New York: Routledge, pp. 156–70Google Scholar
(2004) “Kim Jong Il Re-Embraces the Bear, Looking for the Morning Calm: North Korea's Policy Toward Russia Since 1994,” in , ed., North Korea and the World: Explaining Pyongyang's Foreign Policy, Seoul: Kyungnam University Press, pp. 239–84Google Scholar
and (1979) Utopian Thought in the Western World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2003, November 26) “Japan-North Korean Relations: Selected Issues,” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
(2004, July 1) “South Korea-U.S. Economic Relations: Cooperation, Friction, and Future Prospects,” CRS Report for Congress, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
and (2003, March 17) “U.S. Assistance to North Korea,” Report to Congress, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
(1959) “The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon,” in , ed., Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1967) Writings of Young Marx on Philosophy and Society, Lloyd D. Easton and , trans. and eds., Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
(1985) The Reluctant Crusade: American Foreign Policy in Korea, 1941–1950, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Target North Korea: Pushing North Korea to the Brink of Nuclear Catastrophe, New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
(2001) “The Post-Korean Unification Security Landscape and U.S. Security Policy in Northeast Asia,” in and , eds., Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 251–96Google Scholar
(1999) “Chinese Military Strategy for the Korean Peninsula,” in James R. Lilley and David Shambaugh, eds., China's Military Faces the Future, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 271–94Google Scholar
(1949) Social Theory and Social Structure: Toward the Codification of Theory and Research, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
(2005) “Russo-North Korean Relations,” Paper presented at the International Council for Korean Studies Conference 2005, Arlington, VA, August 5–6
(2006) “Russo-North Korean Relations Under Kim Jong Il,” in Young Whan Kihl and Hong Nack Kim, eds., North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 203–14Google Scholar
and (1964) The Far East in the Modern World, Rev. ed., New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) (1979), Han'guk oegyo 30-nyôn [Thirty Year Diplomacy of the ROK], Seoul: MOFA.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) (1997) Oekyo paekso 1997 [Diplomatic White Paper 1997], Seoul: MOFA.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (1998) HanChung kwankye hyunhwang mit choekun Chungkuk chungse [The State of ROK-PRC Relations and Recent Chinese Affairs], Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (1999) Oekyo paekso 1998 [Diplomatic White Paper 1998], Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2000) Oekyo paekso 1999 [Diplomatic White Paper 1999]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2001) Oekyo paekso 2000 [Diplomatic White Paper 2000]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2002) Oekyo paekso 2001 [Diplomatic White Paper 2001]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2003) Oekyo paekso 2002 [Diplomatic White Paper 2002]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2004) Oekyo paekso 2003 [Diplomatic White Paper 2003]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) (2005) Oekyo paekso 2004 [Diplomatic White Paper 2004]. Seoul: MOFAT.
Ministry of National Defense (MND) (2000) 2000 Defense White Papers, Seoul: MND.
Ministry of National Defense (MND) (2003) ROK-US Alliance and USFK, Rev. Edition, Seoul: MND.
Ministry of National Defense (MND) (2005) 2004 Defense White Paper, Seoul: MND.
Ministry of Unification (MOU) (2003a, February) Tong'il paekso 2003 [Unification White Paper 2003]. Seoul: MOU.
Ministry of Unification (MOU) (2003b, December) 2004 PukHan Kaeyo [2004 North Korean Synopsis]. Seoul: MOU.
Ministry of Unification (MOU) (2004, February) Tong'il paekso 2004 [Unification White Paper 2004]. Seoul: MOU.
Ministry of Unification (MOU) (2005, February) Tong'il paekso 2005 [Unification White Paper 2005]. Seoul: MOU.
(2002/03) “A Blueprint for U.S. Policy Toward a Unified Korea,” Washington Quarterly, 26(1), 23–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) “International Quasi-Crisis: Theory and a Case of Japan-South Korean Bilateral Friction,” Asian Perspective, 15(2), 99–123.Google Scholar
(2002) “Sustaining Inter-Korean Reconciliation: North-South Korea Cooperation,” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies, 12, 225–50Google Scholar
(2005) “Rethinking Korean Unification and the Future of North Korea,” Korea and World Affairs, 29(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (2000) The Perry Report, the Missile Quagmire, and the North Korean Question: The Quest of New Alternatives, Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
, , and , eds. (2001) Ending the Cold War in Korea: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
and (2001) “The Future of the North Korean System,” in , ed. The North Korean System in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Palgrave, pp. 221–58.Google Scholar
(2000) “Strangers in the Midst of Globalization: Migrant Workers and Korean Nationalism,” in , ed., Korea's Globalization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–69Google Scholar
(2003) “Korean Nationalism, Anti-Americanism, and Democratic Consolidation,” in , ed., Korea's Democratization, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–58.Google Scholar
(1978) Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt, White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979) Strategies of Survival: The Foreign Policy Dilemmas of Smaller Asian States, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
and , eds. (1984) The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (2005, February 9) The North Korean Economy: Background and Policy Analysis, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
and (1986) Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(1992) “North Korea's Nuclear Weapons Program,” CRS Issue Brief. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
(1994a) “Comprehensive Negotiations with North Korea: A Viable Alternative for a Failed U.S. Strategy,” Korea and World Affairs, 18, 250–72Google Scholar
(1994b) “Opportunities and Challenges in Clinton's Confidence-Building Strategy Towards North Korea,” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 6, 145–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994) “Less Filling, Tastes Great: The Realist-Neoliberal Debate,” World Politics, 46, 209–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1998) Economic Integration of the Korean Peninsula, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
(2000a) Avoiding the Apocalypse: The Future of the Two Koreas, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
(2000b) “The Economics of Korean Unification,” [Online], Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Available at http://www.iie./publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=364.
(2001) “Economic Strategies for Reunification,” in Nicholas Eberstadt and , eds., Korea's Future and the Great Powers, Seattle: The National Bureau of Asian Research and University of Washington Press, pp. 191–228Google Scholar
(2002) “North Korea's External Economic Relations: Globalization in ‘Our Own Style’,” in Samuel S. Kim and Tai Hwan Lee, eds., North Korea and Northeast Asia, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 165–93Google Scholar
(2003, July) “Famine and Reform in North Korea,” Institute for International Economics Working Paper, WP 03–5, July
(2004a) “The Strategic Importance of U.S.-Korea Economic Relations,” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies, 14, 79–102.Google Scholar
(2004b) Korea After Kim Jong-il, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
, , and (1998) “The Costs and Benefits of Korean Unification,” Asian Survey, 38, 801–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North Korea Advisory Group (1999), “Report to the Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives,” November
(1988) Reflections on Political Identity, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1974) “Transnational Relations and Interstate Conflicts: An Empirical Analysis,” International Organization, 28, 961–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “East Asian Security: The Case for Deep Engagement,” Foreign Affairs, 74(4), 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999) “North Korea Between Collapse and Reform,” Asian Survey, 39(2), 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) North Korea Through the Looking Glass. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
and (2003) Crisis on the Korean Peninsula: How to Deal with a Nuclear North Korea, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
(2000) “The North Korean Crisis and Japan's Choice,” in , ed., The Two Koreas and the United States, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 119–29Google Scholar
(2003) “The United States and the Korean Peace Process,” in Tae-Hwan Kwak and Seung-Ho Joo, eds., The Korean Peace Process and the Four Powers, Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 76–97Google Scholar
. (1976) Images of the World in the Year 2000: A Comparative Ten Nation Study, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
(1985) “Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies,” World Politics, 38, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Korean Unification and Japan's Foreign Policy,” in Lee Young-Sun and Masao Okonogi, eds., Japan and Korean Unification, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 33–50Google Scholar
(1998) “Human Needs, Human Rights, and Regime Legitimacy: The North Korean Anomaly,” in Moon Chung-in, ed., Understanding Regime Dynamics in North Korea, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 221–35Google Scholar
(2006) “The Korean Wave: Transnational Cultural Flows in Northeast Asia,” in , Gilbert Rozman, , and Stephen Kotkin, eds., Korea at the Center: Dynamics of Regionalism in Northeast Asia, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 244–56Google Scholar
(1998) “International Perceptions of Korean Unification Issues,” Korea Focus, 6(1), 72–80.Google Scholar
(1999) “The Great Powers in the Twentieth Century: From Dawn to Dusk,” in , ed., A Century's Journey: How the Great Powers Shape the World, New York: Basic Books, pp. 1–31Google Scholar
(1994) Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Russian Security in the Pacific Asian Region: The Dangers of Isolation,” in Gilbert Rozman, , and Koji Watanabe, eds., Russia and East Asia: The 21st Century Security Environment, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 44–59Google Scholar
(1999) “Review of United States Policy Toward North Korea: Findings and Recommendations.” Available at http://www.state.gov/www/regions/eap/991012_northkorea_rpt.html.
(2002) “The United States and the Future of East Asian Security: – Quo Vadis?” in , ed., Building Common Peace and Prosperity in Northeast Asia, Seoul: Yonsei University Press, pp. 119–29Google Scholar
(1999) “Between Europe and Asia: The Search for Russia's Civilizational Identity,” in , ed., Russia and Asia: The Emerging Security Agenda, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–51Google Scholar
(2003) “The United States, North Korea, and the End of the Agreed Framework,” Naval War College Review, 56(3), 11–49.Google Scholar
(1991) “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations,” American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1303–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) “The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate,” International Organization, 48(2), 313–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “A State of the Nation Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation (Moscow, May 16, 2003),” International Affairs (Moscow), 49(4), 1–17.Google Scholar
(1988) “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization, 42, 427–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “A Three Bloc World? The New East Asian Regionalism,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2(2), 167–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005) “Responses: Red-Handed: The Truth About North Korea's Weapons Program,” Foreign Affairs, 84(2), 142–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003, January 24) “North Korea: Economic Sanctions,” Report for Congress, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
(1994) “Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War,” International Organization, 48(2), 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Korea in the Pacific Century: Selected Speeches 1990–1992, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
(1998) “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics, 51, 144–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (1993) The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) “Toward Single-Country Theories of Foreign Policy: The Case of the USSR,” in Charles Hermann, , and James Rosenau, eds., New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin, pp. 53–74Google Scholar
(1990) Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1994) “China in a Bifurcated World: Competing Theoretical Perspectives,” in Thomas W. Robinson and David Shambaugh, eds., Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 524–51.Google Scholar
(1996) “The Dynamics of Globalization: Toward an Operational Formulation,” Security Dialogue, 27(3), 247–62Google Scholar
(2002b) “Japan and South Korea: Should the U.S. Be Worried About Their New Spat in 2001?” Pacific Review, 15(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002, May) “South Korean Identity: In Search of National Pride, East Asian Regionalism and a Role in Globalization,” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Princeton University
(2003) “Japan's North Korean Initiative and U.S.-Japanese Relations,” Orbis, 47(3), 527–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Northeast Asia's Stunted Regionalism: Bilateral Distrust in the Shadow of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , eds. (1999) Russia and East Asia: The 21st Century Security Environment, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
(1997) “Russia's Relations with North Korea,” in and , eds., Imperial Decline: Russia's Changing Role in Asia, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 155–84Google Scholar
(1998) “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization, 52(4), 855–85
(1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (2001) Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
(2004) “Payback Time: Japan-North Korea Economic Relations,” in Ahn Choong-yong, Nicholas Eberstadt, and Lee Young-sun, eds., A New International Engagement Framework for North Korea? Contending Perspectives, Washington, DC: Korean Economic Institute of America, pp. 317–33Google Scholar
(1997) “North Korea at a Crossroads,” Essays in Public Policy No. 73, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution, Stanford University, pp. 1–18.
and (1972) Communism in Korea, Part I: The Movement, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2003) “America's Vulnerable Imperialism,” YaleGlobal, November 24. Available at http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=2873.Google Scholar
(1996) “Globalisation and Collective Identities,” in and , eds. Identities in International Relations, New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 38–78.Google Scholar
and , eds. (1971) Small States in International Relations, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell.Google Scholar
(1998) Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2004a, March) China and North Korea: From Comrades-in-Arms to Allies at Arm's Length, Strategic Studies Institute Monograph, Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) “China and Inter-Korean Relations: Beijing as Balancer,” in , ed. Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
(2005, July) North Korea's Strategic Intentions, Strategic Studies Institute Monograph, Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejong Institute (1995) ’95 Kukmin uisik chosa [Survey of National Consciousness, 1995], Seoul: Sejong Institute.
Sejong Institute (1997) Korea's National Strategy: Agenda Setting for the 21st Century, Seoul: Sejong Institute.
(2005) “China: Background Paper on the Situation of North Koreans in China,” A Writenet Report, Commissioned by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Protection Information Section (DIP). January. Available http://www.unhcr.ch/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home/opendoc.pd?tbl=RSDCOI&id=4231d11d4.
(2006) “The Exodus: North Korea's Out-Migration,” in , ed., The Future of U.S.- Korean Relations, New York: Routledge, pp. 130–59.Google Scholar
(2003) “China and the Korean Peninsula: Playing for the Long Term,” The Washington Quarterly, 26(2), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004/05) “China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order,” International Security, 29(3), 64–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (2006) Power Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2003) “Weihu DongBeiYa anquan de dangwu zhili [The Urgent Task of Preserving Peace in Northeast Asia],” Shijie jingji yu zhengshi [World Economics and Politics], 9, 53–58
(2003) “How to Understand and Deal with the DPRK Nuclear Crisis,” Ta Kung Pao (Hong Kong), January 15, p. A11 (trans. FBIS-CHI-2003–0115, January 16, 2003)Google Scholar
and (2004) “The Politics of Nationalism in U.S.-Korean Relations,” Asian Perspective, 28(4), 119–45Google Scholar
(1986) “The Struggle for Democracy in South Korea in the 1980s and the Rise of Anti-Americanism,” Third World Quarterly, 8(4), 1195–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Who is Fighting Peace in Korea? An Undiplomatic History,” World Policy Journal, 24, 44–58.Google Scholar
(1998) Disarming Strangers: Nuclear Diplomacy with North Korea, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) “Negotiating an End to North Korea's Missile Making,” Arms Control Today, 30(5), 3–7.Google Scholar
(1984/85) “Richness, Rigor, and Relevance in the Study of Soviet Foreign Policy,” International Security, 9(3), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) “North Korea's Decline and China's Strategic Dilemma. Special Report,” Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
(1999) Negotiating on the Edge: North Korean Negotiating Behavior, Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
(2000/01) “North Korea's Challenge of Regime Survival: Internal Problems and Implications for the Future,” Pacific Affairs, 73(4), 517–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003a) “China–Korea Relations: Beijing in the Driver's Sear? China's Rising Influence on the Two Koreas,” Comparative Connections [Online], 4(4): 95–101. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0204q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2003b) “China–Korea Relations: A Turning Point for China?” Comparative Connections [Online], 5(2): 101–07. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0302q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2003c) “China–Korea Relations: Middle Kingdom Diplomacy and the North Korean Nuclear Crisis,” Comparative Connections [Online], 5(3): 113–18. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0303q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2004) “China–Korea Relations: No Shows, Economic Growth, and People Problems,” Comparative Connections [Online], 5(4): 111–17. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0304q.pdf.Google Scholar
(2005) “China–Korea Relations: Six-Party Success and China's Peninsular Diplomacy,” Comparative Connections [Online], 7(3): 109–16. Available at http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/0503q.pdf.Google Scholar
, , and (2005) “The Six-Party Talks: Developing a Roadmap for Future Progress,” Issues & Insights 5(8): 1–28.Google Scholar
(2002) “A Russian View of the Future Korean Peninsula,” in , ed., The Future of North Korea, New York: Routledge, pp. 129–46Google Scholar
(1998) “Lengzhan hou DongbeiYa anquan xingshe de bianhua [Changes in the Post-Cold War Northeast Asian Security Situation],” Xiandai guoji guanxi [Contemporary International Relations], 9, 34–38.Google Scholar
(1988) Enter the Dragon: China's Undeclared War Against the U.S. in Korea, 1950–1951, New York: Newmarket Press.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2001) SIPRI Yearbook 2001: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, New York: Oxford University Press.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2002) SIPRI Yearbook 2002: Armament, Disarmament and International Security, New York: Oxford University Press.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2004) SIPRI Yearbook 2004: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, New York: Oxford University Press.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2005) SIPRI Yearbook 2005: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, New York: Oxford University Press.
(1995) The Korean War: An International History, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1967) The Korean Communist Movement 1918–1948, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) “The Prospects for Change in North Korea,” Korea and World Affairs, 17(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
(2006) “Imbalance of Power, Balance of Asymmetric Terror: Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) in Korea,” in , ed., The Future of U.S.-Korean Relations, New York: Routledge, pp. 64–80.Google Scholar
(1999/2000) “Provisional Stabilities: The Politics of Identities in Post-Soviet Eurasia,” International Security, 24(3), 139–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Playing by the Rules in Korea: Lessons Learned in the North-South Economic Engagement,” Asia Survey, 43(2), 305–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (1972) Theory and Policy in International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) After the Empire: The Breakdown of the American Order, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Russia and North Korea,” in , ed., The Future of North Korea, New York: Routledge, pp. 147–56Google Scholar
(2003b) “President Putin's Korea Policy,” The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 17(1), 23–51.Google Scholar
(1998) “Conflicting ‘Homeland Myths’ and Nation-State Building in Postcommunist Russia,” Slavic Review 57 (2), 267–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (1999) Human Development Report 1999, New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2004) Human Development Report 2004, New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2005). Human Development Report 2005, New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2003) State of the Environment DPR Korea 2003 [Online]. Available at http://www.unep.org/PDF/DPRK_SOE_Report.pdf.
United States Department of Defense (1990) A Strategic Framework for the Asian Pacific Rim: Looking Towards the Twenty-first Century, Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
United States Department of Defense (2001) Quadrennial Defense Review Report (QDRR 2001), September 30, p. 2. Available at http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/qdr2001.pdf.
(1987) “Foreign Policy, Learning, and War,” in , , and , eds., New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston: Allen & Unwin, pp. 366–83Google Scholar
(1992) “World Politics Theory,” in and , eds., Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, Vol. 2, New York: Routledge, pp. 839–61Google Scholar
(1971) “Sequences and Development,” in Leonard Binder et al., eds., Crises and Sequences in Political Development, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1967) The Inequality of States: A Study of the Small Power in International Relations, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Russia and the Korean Peninsula: Contemporary Realities and Prospects,” Far Eastern Affairs, 30(3)Google Scholar
(1992) Kim Il-song kwa Manchu hanil chonchaeng [Kim Il Sung and the Manchurian Resistance War Against Japan], Yi Chong-sok, trans., Seoul: Ch'angchak kwapi pyongsa.
(1996) “The Sources of Russian Conduct: Theories, Frameworks, and Approaches,” in , ed., The Sources of Russian Foreign Policy after the Cold War, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
and (1993) “Armed Conflict at the End of the Cold War, 1989–92,” Journal of Peace Research, 30, 331–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001) “Armed Conflict, 1989–2001,” Journal of Peace Research, 38(5), 629–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “International Relations: One World, Many Theories,” Foreign Policy, 110, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Evaluating Theories,” American Political Science Review, 91(4), 913–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “China and Korean Unification: A Policy of Status Quo,” Korea and World Affairs, 22, 177–98Google Scholar
(1999) “Joining the Major Powers for the Status Quo: China's Views and Policy on Korean Reunification,” Pacific Affairs, 72, 167–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Territorial Disputes and Asian Security: Sources, Management, and Prospects,” in , ed., Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 380–423.Google Scholar
(1999) “Mianxiang ershi shiji de Zhongguo waijiao: sanzhong xuqiu de xunqiu jiqi pinghem [China's Diplomacy for the 21st Century: Seeking and Balancing Three Demands],” Zhanlue yu guanli [Strategy and Management], 6, 18–27.Google Scholar
, ed. Construction Within Contradictions: Multiple Perspectives on the Relationship Between China and International Organizations, Beijing: China Development Publishing House.
(1995) “To Attack, or Not to Attack? Stalin, Kim Il Sung, and the Prelude to War,” Bulletin of Cold War International History Project, 5, 1–9.Google Scholar
(1996) “New Russian Documents on the Korean War: Introduction and Translations,” Bulletin of Cold War International History Project, 6–7, 30–84.Google Scholar
(1968) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, in H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, eds., New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1986) Society and Identity: Toward a Sociological Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987) “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Security, 41, 335–70Google Scholar
(1992) “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, 46, 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review, 88, 384–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “Constructing International Politics,” International Security, 20(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Social Theory of International Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) “Review of Rossiia I Koreia v geopolitike evrazeiskogo vostoka [Russia and Korea in the Geopolitics of the Eurasian East] by Vladimir Li,” Northeast Asia Peace and Security Network, Special ReportGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Mending Fences: Moscow's China Policy from Brezhnev to Yeltsin, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Russian-North Korean Relations: A New Era?” in Samuel S. Kim and Tai Hwan Lee, eds., North Korea and Northeast Asia, New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 139–62Google Scholar
(2004) “Russia in Inter-Korean Relations,” in , ed., Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 117–38Google Scholar
, , and (2004) Going Critical: The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
(1993) The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1994/95) “Realism and the End of the Cold War,” International Security, 19(2), 91–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security, 24(1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Long-Term Economic and Military Trends, 1994–2015: The United States and Asia, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
and (2005) North Korean Paradoxes: Circumstances, Costs, and Consequences of Korean Unification, Santa Monica, CA: Rand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank (1991) World Development Report 1991, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (1996) World Development Report 1996, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (1997) World Development Report 1997, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (1999) World Development Report 1998/99, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2001) World Development Report 2000/2001, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2002) World Development Report 2002, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2003a) World Development Report 2003, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2003b) World Development Report 2004, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2004) World Development Report 2005, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2005) World Development Report 2006, New York: Oxford University Press.
World Food Programme (2005a) “WFP DPR Korea EMOP 10141.3 Emergency Food World Food Programme Assistance to Vulnerable Groups.” Available at http://www.wfp.org/operations/current_operations/project_docs/101413.pdf).
World Food Programme (2005b) “Update on Korea, Democratic Republic,” May 18
(2004) “Policy Recommendations for Japan: Unification of the Korean Peninsula,” Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies.
(1995) “Lengzhan hou Zhongguo de duiwai anquan zhanlüe [China's post-Cold War External Security Strategy],” Xiandai guoji guanxi [Contemporary International Relations], 8, 23–29.Google Scholar
and (1995) “Zhanwang xia shiji chu guoji zhengzhi [Prospects for International Politics in the Beginning of the Next Century],” Xiandai guoji guanxi [Contemporary International Relations], 6, 2–8.Google Scholar
(1994) “Dui Dong Ya anquan wenti de fenxi [An Analysis of the East Asian Security Problem],” Guoji wenti yanjiu [International Studies], 3, 19–22.Google Scholar
, , and (2004) “Russo-North Korean Relations in the 2000s: Moscow's Continuing Search for Regional Influence,” Asian Survey, 44(6), 794–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “China's Korea Policy: From ‘One Korea’ to ‘Two Koreas,’” Asian Affairs, 22(2), 119–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “North Korean Defectors Abroad and in South Korea,” Development and Security, 30(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
(2006) Fragile Cooperation: Net Threat Theory and Japan-Korea-U.S. Relations, PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, Columbia University, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Chaoxian bandao xingshi de fazhan yu qianjing [The Evolving Situation and Future Prospects of the Korean Peninsula],” Guoji wenti yanjiu [International Studies], 4, 12–16.Google Scholar
and (1990) “China's Decision to Enter the Korean War: History Revisited,” The China Quarterly, 121, 94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Russia in North Korean Foreign Policy,” in , ed., North Korean Foreign Relations, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America's World Role, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1994) Zhongguo Renmin Jiefang Jun [China's People's Liberation Army], Vol. 1, Contemporary China Series, Beijing: Dangdai Zhongguo Chubanshe.
(1998) “The Korean Peninsula and China's National Security: Past, Present, and Future,” Asian Perspective, 22, 259–72Google Scholar
(1997) “China's Korea Unification Policy,” in , ed., The Four Powers and Korean UnificationStrategies, Seoul: Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University, pp. 59–86Google ScholarPubMed
(2005) “The Bush Doctrine, Russia, and Korea,” in Mel Gurtov and Peter Van Ness, eds., Confronting the Bush Doctrine: Critical Views from the Asia-Pacific, New York: Routledge Curzon, pp. 130–52Google Scholar
(1998) “The Relationship Between TMD and the Global and Regional Security,” Guoji wenti yanjiu [International Studies], 1, 27–29.Google Scholar