Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:05:57.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Where and how it comes to pass: interest group interaction with political institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2009

Stephen M. Engel
Affiliation:
Bates College, Maine
Get access

Summary

Reassessing and expanding the model

Interest group access in parliamentary systems is often more structured and executive-centered than in the United States. But this does not mean that interest groups are less influential. In many parliamentary systems, interest groups may be less well placed than their American counterparts to overturn government decisions that conflict with their goals, but they may be better placed to ensure that such decisions are never made to begin with.

R. Kent Weaver and Bert A. Rockman, Do Institutions Matter?

The previous two chapters have traced the parallel developmental pattern of the British and American gay and lesbian movements: a changing opportunity – or multiple opportunities – was exploited by pre-existing organizations and coupled with cognitive liberation and subsequent collective affirmative identity formation to produce a social movement. This movement then spurred sundry interest groups at various levels of government. These histories are paradoxical; although the American movement emerged first, was recognized as the international leader, and maintained the largest mass constituency, it has been unable to secure any formalized national recognition of legal equality. Yet, its smaller British counterpart achieved this feat at a date when a movement – as defined by the political process model – had not yet fully formed.

Similar mobilization histories are told with regard to the AIDS crisis possibly because AIDS acts as an exogenous shock to the movement. In other words, AIDS was recognized as a global crisis fostering mobilization by gay organizations throughout the world. Second, both the United States and the United Kingdom were governed by conservative leaders at the beginning of the epidemic.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Unfinished Revolution
Social Movement Theory and the Gay and Lesbian Movement
, pp. 99 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×