Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:52:10.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Tacit citing: the scarcity of judicial dialogue between the global and the regional human rights mechanisms in freedom of expression cases

from Part II - Selected thematic focuses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Tarlach McGonagle
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Yvonne Donders
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Balsytė-Lideikienė v. Lithuania (Appl. No. 72596/01), Judgment, 4 November 2008.Google Scholar
Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway (Appl. No. 21980/93), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 20 May 1999.Google Scholar
De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium (Appl. No. 19983/92), Judgment, 24 February 1997.Google Scholar
Ergin v. Turkey (No. 6) (Appl. No. 47533/99), Judgment, 4 May 2006.Google Scholar
Féret v. Belgium (Appl. No. 15615/07), Judgment, 16 July 2009.Google Scholar
Glasenapp v. Germany, (Appl. No. 9228/80), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 28 August 1986.Google Scholar
Grigoriades v. Greece (Appl. No. 24348/94), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 25 November 1997.Google Scholar
Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland (Appl. No. 10890/84), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 28 March 1990.Google Scholar
Gündüz v. Turkey (Appl. No. 35071/97), Judgment (Chamber), 4 December 2003.Google Scholar
Handyside v. the United Kingdom (Appl. No. 5493/72), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 7 December 1978.Google Scholar
Jersild v. Denmark (Appl. No. 15890/89), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 23 September 1994.Google Scholar
Kosiek v. Germany (Appl. No. 9704/82), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 28 August 1986.Google Scholar
Lepojić v. Serbia (Appl. No. 13909/05), Judgment, 6 November 2007.Google Scholar
Lingens v. Austria (Appl. No. 9815/82), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 8 July 1986.Google Scholar
Loizidou v. Turkey (Appl. No. 15318/89), Judgment, 18 December 1996.Google Scholar
Müller and Others v. Switzerland (Appl. No. 10737/84), Judgment, 24 May 1988.Google Scholar
Oberschlick v. Austria (Appl. No. 11662/85), Judgment, 23 May 1991.Google Scholar
Perinçek v. Switzerland (Appl. No. 27510/08), Judgment, 17 December 2013.Google Scholar
Schwabe v. Austria (Appl. No. 13704/88), Judgment, 28 August 1992.Google Scholar
Stoll v. Switzerland (Appl. No. 69698/01), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 10 December 2007.Google Scholar
Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (No. 1) (Appl. No. 6538/74), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 26 April 1979.Google Scholar
Tønsbergs Blad AS and Haukom v. Norway (Appl. No. 510/04), Judgment, 1 March 2007.Google Scholar
Vogt v. Germany (Appl. No. 17851/91), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 26 September 1995.Google Scholar
Yıldırım v. Turkey (Appl. No. 3111/10), Judgment, 18 December 2012.Google Scholar
Youth Initiative for Human Rights v. Serbia (Appl. No. 48135/06), Judgment, 25 June 2013.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Aduayom and Others v. Togo, Nos. 422/1990 a.o., 12 July 1996.Google Scholar
Anthony Michael Immanuel Fernando v. Sri Lanka, No. 1189/2003, 31 March 2005.Google Scholar
Avon Lovell v. Australia, No. 920/2000, 24 March 2004.Google Scholar
Dobroslav Paraga v. Croatia, No. 727/1996, 4 April 2001.Google Scholar
Gauthier v. Canada, No. 633/1995, 5 May 1999.Google Scholar
J. Ballantyne, E. Davidson and G. McIntyre v. Canada, Nos. 359/1989 and 385/1989, 5 May 1993.Google Scholar
Jacobus Gerardus Strik v. the Netherlands, No. 1001/2001, 1 November 2002.Google Scholar
Malcolm Ross v. Canada, No. 736/1997, 18 October 2000.Google Scholar
Robert Faurisson v. France, No. 550/1993, 8 November 1996.Google Scholar
Zeljko Bodrozic v. Serbia and Montenegro, No. 1180/2003, 31 October 2005.Google Scholar
Caesar v. Trinidad and Tobago, Series C No. 123, 11 March 2005.Google Scholar
Heliodoro Portugal v. Panama, Series C No.186, 12 August 2008.Google Scholar
Herrera-Ulloa v. Costa Rica, Series C No. 107, 2 July 2004.Google Scholar
Olmedo-Bustos and Others v. Chile, Series C No. 73, 5 February 2001.Google Scholar
Ricardo Canese v. Paraguay, Series C No. 111, 31 August 2004.Google Scholar
Ríos and Others v. Venezuela, Series C No. 194, 28 January 2009.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×