Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Urban ecology
- 2 Urbanisation
- 3 Urban environments and ecosystem functions
- 4 Individual species and urbanisation
- 5 Species diversity and urbanisation: patterns, drivers and implications
- 6 Urbanisation and alien invasion
- 7 Interactions between people and nature in urban environments
- 8 Urban ecology and human social organisation
- 9 Urban ecology and human health and wellbeing
- 10 Bringing cities alive: the importance of urban green spaces for people and biodiversity
- 11 Integrating nature values in urban planning and design
- 12 Urban futures
- Index
- References
1 - Urban ecology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Urban ecology
- 2 Urbanisation
- 3 Urban environments and ecosystem functions
- 4 Individual species and urbanisation
- 5 Species diversity and urbanisation: patterns, drivers and implications
- 6 Urbanisation and alien invasion
- 7 Interactions between people and nature in urban environments
- 8 Urban ecology and human social organisation
- 9 Urban ecology and human health and wellbeing
- 10 Bringing cities alive: the importance of urban green spaces for people and biodiversity
- 11 Integrating nature values in urban planning and design
- 12 Urban futures
- Index
- References
Summary
What is urban ecology?
Real ecologists study wild and natural places. At least, that has been the view which has dominated the field of ecology for much of its existence. Some lone voices argued that this was a narrow, unrealistic and unhelpful perspective, but their arguments were easily ignored by the majority as they focused on their supposedly pristine field sites. This was always something of an irony, as surely there was never any real doubt that less wild and natural areas equally functioned as ecosystems, containing the same essential components (e.g. water, soil, microorganisms, plants, animals), and being subject to much the same processes (e.g. carbon, nutrient and water cycles). Thus, towards the close of the twentieth century and the dawning of the twenty-first, this viewpoint changed radically. Growing numbers of studies focused on the patterns and processes structuring systems that had been heavily modified, or were essentially created, by human activities. This change was particularly evident with respect to the ecology of urban areas, with numerous research studies, commentaries and reviews being published (e.g. Gilbert 1989; McDonnell & Pickett 1993; Grimm et al. 2000, 2008a, 2008b; Marzluff et al. 2001, 2008; Pickett et al. 2001; Kelcey & Rheinwald 2005; Forman 2008). Indeed, not only did ecologists begin to study urban systems in earnest, but urban ecology also began to influence the study of ecology more widely. In short, urban ecology came of age.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Urban Ecology , pp. 1 - 9Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(2005). The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. International Regional Science Review, 28, 168–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. BioScience, 53, 1169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2008). Ecological footprint analysis applied to a sub-national area: the case of the Province of Siena (Italy). Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 354–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2001). Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science, 291, 2616–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1996). Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications, 6, 506–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1999). Variation in quality and decomposability of red oak leaf litter along an urban–rural gradient. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30, 258–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120 years: a case study of the city of Plzeň. Flora, 198, 366–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2003). Species richness, human population size and energy: conservation implications at a national scale. Ecological Applications, 13, 1223–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2008). City-wide relationships between green spaces, urban form and topography. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 269–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998). Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient. Oecologia, 113, 269–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005). Designed experiments: new approaches to studying urban ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 549–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Urban Regions: Ecology and Planning Beyond the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2005). Biodiversity and extinction: species and people. Progress in Physical Geography, 29, 239–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Birds and people in Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 271, 1649–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2005). Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2008a). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319, 756–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , et al. (2008b). The changing landscape: ecosystem responses to urbanization and pollution across climatic and societal gradients. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 264–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience, 50, 571–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2006). Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems, 9, 578–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997). Understory plant species composition in remnant stands along an urban-to-rural land-use gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (1997). A citywide breeding bird survey for Washington, D.C. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Nature and Health. The Influence of Nature on Social, Psychological and Physical Well-being. The Hague, Netherlands: Health Council of the Netherlands and Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment.
, , et al. (2003). Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100, 8788–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1995). The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (2005). Birds in European Cities. St Katharinen: Ginster Verlag.
, and (1999). Urban plant ecology patterns and processes: a case study of the flora of the City of Plymouth, Devon, UK. Journal of Biogeography, 26, 1281–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995). Effects of human activity on global extinction risk. Conservation Biology, 9, 1528–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2005). The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecology and Society, 10, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007). Compositional similarity among urban floras within and across continents: biogeographical consequences of human-mediated biotic interchange. Global Change Biology, 13, 913–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004). Alleviating spatial conflict between people and biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101, 182–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 587–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.) (2001). Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (eds.) (2008). Urban Ecology: An International Perspective on the Interaction between Humans and Nature. New York: Springer.CrossRef
and (1990). Ecosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology, 71, 1232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (1993). Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (1997). Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of ‘urban’ between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosystems, 4, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, Vol. I. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
, , et al. (1999). Changes in breeding bird richness and abundance in Montreal parks over a period of 15 years. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44, 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2002). Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban–rural gradients: an international comparison. Landscape Ecology, 17, 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Advancing urban ecological studies: frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. Austral Ecology, 31, 114–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2001). Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 127–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). New York's nature: a review of the status and trends in species richness across the metropolitan area. Diversity and Distributions, 15, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. Journal of Biogeography, 25, 155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 4, 121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). The response of the terrestrial biosphere to urbanization: land cover conversion, climate, and urban pollution. Biogeosciences, 5, 1505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Citywide biological monitoring as a tool for ecology and conservation in urban landscapes: the case of the Tucson Bird Count. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004). Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. BioScience, 54, 585–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Difficulties with estimating city-wide urban forest cover change from national, remotely-sensed tree canopy maps. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Urban development and insect biodiversity of the Rome area, Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 38, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11
- Cited by