Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:34:03.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - A Place for Head Start in a World of Universal Preschool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Edward Zigler
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Walter S. Gilliam
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Stephanie M. Jones
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Sally J. Styfco
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access

Summary

When the idea for Head Start was developed in the mid-1960s, organized schooling for young children was uncommon. Some children from upper- and middle-income families attended “nursery school”, as preschool was called, but the majority stayed home until they were old enough to begin elementary school. At the time, fewer than half the states offered kindergarten, although generally not in all districts nor was it compulsory. For many children formal education therefore began with first grade when they were six or seven years old. Head Start was thus a great national experiment to enroll children from poor families before they reached school age.

Forty years later, it is safe to say the experiment was successful. The Head Start model has been proved effective and has become the standard for comprehensive intervention services for at-risk children. Early childhood has become an active field of research, with voluminous results showing that quality preschool programs enhance school readiness and later academic performance and adjustment among children raised in poverty. Head Start's major contributions to this knowledge base established the program's worth and justified its expansion.

Serious expansion began in the late 1980s, when early education was rediscovered as the foundation for successful schooling. In what quickly became a “Head Start lovefest” (Chafel, 1992, p. 9), policy makers and office seekers of every political persuasion vowed to give the program “full funding.” At the time, Head Start was serving less than 30 percent of eligible children (National Head Start Association, 1991).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Administration for Children and Families. (2003a). Building futures: The Head Start Impact Study interim report. Washington, DC: Author.
Administration for Children and Families. (2003b). Head Start FACES 2000: A whole-child perspective on program performance. Fourth progress report. Washington, DC: Author.
Administration on Children, Youth and Families. (2005). Head Start program fact sheet. FY 2004. Washington, DC: Author.
Advisory Committee on Head Start Quality and Expansion. (1993). Creating a 21st century Head Start. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (1995-615-032/03069)
Advisory Committee on Services for Families with Infants and Toddlers. (1994). Statement of the Advisory Committee on Services for Families with Infants and Toddlers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Barnett, W. S. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children, 5(3), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, W. S. (2004). Does Head Start have lasting cognitive effects? The myth of fade-out. In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 221–249). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Barnett, W. S., & Hustedt, J. T. (2003). Preschool: The most important grade. Educational Leadership, 60, 54–57.Google Scholar
Bruer, J. T. (1999). The myth of the first three years. New York: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Campbell, E. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). Early childhood education: Outcomes as a function of different treatments. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnegie Task Force on Meeting the Needs of Young Children. (1994). Starting points: Meeting the needs of our youngest children. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
Chafel, J. A. (1992). Funding Head Start: What are the issues? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comptroller General. (1979, February 6). Early childhood and family development programs improve the quality of life for low-income families. Report to Congress (HRD-79–49). Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
Durlak, J. A. (1998). Common risk and protective factors in successful prevention programs. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 512–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn-Stevenson, M., & Zigler, E. (1999). Schools of the 21st Century: Linking child care and education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, A. J. (2004). Professional social work involvement in Head Start. In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 329–338). Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office. (1997, April). Head Start: Research provides little information on impact of current program. Washington, DC: Author. (Report No. GAO/HEHS-97-59)
Gilliam, W. S., & Ripple, C. H. (2004). What can be learned from state-funded prekindergarten initiatives? A data-based approach to the Head Start devolution debate. In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 477–497). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Gilliam, W. S., & Shahar, G. (in press). Prekindergarten expulsion and suspension: Rates and predictors in one state. Infants and Young Children.Google Scholar
Graue, E. M. (2003). Kindergarten in the 21st century. In Reynolds, A. J., Wang, M., & Walberg, H. (Eds.), Early childhood programs for a new century (pp. 143–162). Washington, DC: CWLA Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, P. (2004). Three core concepts in the War on Poverty: Their origins and significance in Head Start. In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 61–83). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Harmon, C. (2004). Was Head Start a Community Action Program? Another look at an old debate. In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 85–101). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Kauffman, M., & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.). (1995). The illusion of full inclusion. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Kisker, E., Paulsell, D., Love, J., & Raikes, H. (2002). Pathways to quality and full implementation in Early Head Start programs. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knitzer, J. (2004). The challenge of mental health in Head Start: Making the vision real. In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 179–192). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Lombardi, J., & Cubbage, A. S. (2004). Head Start in the 1990s: Striving for quality through a decade of improvement. In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 283–295). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Love, J. M., et al. (2002). Making a difference in the lives of infants and toddlers and their families: The impacts of Early Head Start. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Merrow, J. (2002, September 25). The “failure” of Head Start. Education Week, p. 52.Google Scholar
Muenchow, S., & Marsland, K. W. (in press). Beyond baby steps: Promoting the growth and development of U.S. child care policy. In Child development and social policy: Knowledge for action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M., Bishop-Josef, S. J., Nowlin, C., Pagano, M. E., & Jellinek, M. S. (2004). Testing a model mental health program in Head Start. Yale University, manuscript under review.
Murphy, J. M., & Pagano, M. (2000). Enhanced mental health services in Head Start California Endowment Grant. Progress report, fourth quarter. Boston: Massachusetts General Hospital.Google Scholar
National Head Start Association. (1991). Head Start income guidelines are out of touch with poverty. Alexandria, VA: Author.
Omwake, E. B. (1997). Assessment of the Head Start preschool education component. In Zigler, E. & Valentine, J., Project Head Start: A legacy of the War on Poverty (2nd ed., pp. 221–228). Alexandria, VA: National Head Start Association.Google Scholar
Raden, A. (2003). Universal access to prekindergarten: A Georgia case study. In Reynolds, A. J., Wang, M., & Walberg, H. (Eds.), Early childhood programs for a new century (pp. 71–113). Washington, DC: CWLA Press.Google Scholar
Raver, C. C., & Knitzer, J. (2002). Ready to enter. What research tells policymakers about strategies to promote social and emotional school readiness among three- and four-year-old children. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2339–2346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 27. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.Google Scholar
Shahmoon-Shanok, R., Lamb-Parker, F., Halpern, E., Grant, M., Lapidus, C., & Seagle, C. (2005). Relationship for Growth Project: A transformational collaboration between Head Start, mental health, and university systems. In Finello, K. (Ed.), Handbook of training and practice in infant and preschool mental health (pp. 402–424). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.Google Scholar
Silver Ribbon Panel. (1990). Head Start: The nation's pride, a nation's challenge. Alexandria, VA: National Head Start Association.
Snow, C. E., & Páez, M. M. (2004). The Head Start classroom as an oral language environment: What should the Performance Standards be? In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 113–128). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Styfco, S. J. (2000). Children with special educational needs: A case study of advocacy vs. policy vs. research. In Zigler, E. & Hall, N. W., Child development and social policy (pp. 251–281). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Strengthening Head Start: What the evidence shows. Washington, DC: Author.
Verzaro-O'Brien, M., Powell, G., & Sakamoto, L. (1996). Investing in quality revisited: The impact of the Head Start Expansion and Improvement Act of 1990 after five years of investment. Alexandria, VA: National Head Start Association.Google Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J., & Massetti, G. M. (2004). How well does Head Start prepare children to learn to read? In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 251–262). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, H., & Knitzer, J. (1997). Lessons form the field: Head Start mental health strategies to meet changing needs. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.Google Scholar
Zero to Three. (1992). Heart start: The emotional foundations of school readiness. Arlington, VA: Author.
Zigler, E. (1970). The environmental mystique: Training the intellect versus development of the child. Childhood Education, 46, 402–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigler, E., Abelson, W. D., & Seitz, V. (1973). Motivational factors in the performance of economically disadvantaged children on the PPVT. Child Development, 44, 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigler, E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1968). Motivational aspects of changes in IQ test performance of culturally deprived nursery school children. Child Development, 39, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigler, E., Finn-Stevenson, M., & Hall, N. W. (2002). The first three years and beyond. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zigler, E., & Styfco, S. J. (1993). An earlier Head Start: Planning an intervention program for economically disadvantaged families and children ages zero to three. Zero to Three, 14(2), 25–28.Google Scholar
Zigler, E., & Valentine, J. (Eds.). (1997). Project Head Start: A legacy of the War on Poverty (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: National Head Start Association.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×