Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T02:14:46.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Ecosystem services-based approaches to water management: what opportunities and challenges for business?

from Part IV - Broadening the perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Joël Houdet
Affiliation:
Synergiz
Andrew Johnstone
Affiliation:
Groundwater Consulting Services – GCS (Pty) Ltd
Charles Germaneau
Affiliation:
Synergiz
Julia Martin-Ortega
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Robert C. Ferrier
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Iain J. Gordon
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Shahbaz Khan
Affiliation:
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France
Get access

Summary

15.1 INTRODUCTION

Water sourcing, use, and discharge management have become critical issues to numerous business activities throughout the world. For instance, securing water supply is critical to farming and food production (e.g. World Water Assessment Programme 2014), while increasing water use and pollution are starting to generate severe operational, investment, and reputational risks for the agribusiness, mining, industrial, and financial sectors (e.g. Gulati 2014; von Bormann 2014; Bizikova et al. 2014).

Increasing research and funding is being dedicated to the link between ecosystem services and business. For example, in the UK the 2011 Natural Environment White Paper contained a commitment to establish a business-led Ecosystem Markets Task Force to review the opportunities for UK business from expanding green goods, services, products, investment vehicles, and markets which value and protect nature's services. Business and ecosystem services are the central focus of several professional networks including the Business for Social Responsibility's Ecosystem Services Working Group and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development's Ecosystems Focus Area (for a more extensive list, see Hanson et al. 2008; Waage & Kester 2014). As well as an increase in recruitment demanding business expertise in ecosystem services, a body of literature is developing to aid businesses to integrate ecosystem services into existing performance systems (Houdet et al. 2012).

Though most firms depend and/or impact, to varying extents, on the various provisioning, regulating, and cultural ecosystem services derived from aquatic ecosystems, applying an ecosystem services-based approach to their uses of water presents both opportunities and challenges. The aim in this chapter is threefold. First, we intend to explain the interdependency links (dependencies and impacts) between water ecosystem services and various business activities. In doing so, we discuss the main water ecosystem services risks for business activities, notably in terms of water scarcity, ageing water infrastructures, changing policy environments and regulatory frameworks, and reputation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Water Ecosystem Services
A Global Perspective
, pp. 129 - 137
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Billé, R., Laurans, Y., Mermet, L., Pirard, R., & Rankovic, A., (2012). Valuation without action? On the use of economic valuations of ecosystem services. Policy Briefs N°07/2012. IDDRI.
Bizikova, L., Dimple, R., Venema, H., et al. (2014). The Water-Energy-Food Nexus and Agricultural Investment: A Sustainable Development Guidebook. IISD, Canada.
CSIR (2010). A CSIR perspective on water in South Africa. CSIR Report No. CSIR/NRE/PW/IR/2011/0012/A.
Déprés, C., Grolleau, G., & Mzoughi, N. (2008). Contracting for environmental property rights: the case of Vittel. Economica, 75, 412–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, D., Erikson, J. & Patel, N. (2013). GEO-5 for Business. Impacts of a Changing Environment on the Corporate Sector. UNEP, SustainAbility, Green Light Group, Nairobi.
Gulati, M. (2014). Understanding the Food Energy Water Nexus: Through the Energy and Water Lens. WWF-SA, South Africa.
Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J., Iceland, C., & Finisdore, J. (2008). The Corporate Ecosystem Services Review. Guidelines for Identifying Business risks and Opportunities Arising from Ecosystem Change. WRI, WBCSD, and Meridian Institute, Geneva.
Hoekstra, A. Y. (2008). Water Neutral: Reducing and Offsetting the Impacts of Water Footprints. UNECSO, Delft.
Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2011). The Water Footprint Assessment Manual. Setting the Global Standard. Water Footprint Network and Earthscan, London.
Houdet, J. (2008). Integrating Biodiversity into Business Strategies: The Biodiversity Accountability Framework. FRB – Orée, Paris.
Houdet, J., Trommetter, M., & Weber, J. (2012). Understanding changes in business strategies regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 73, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Directors Southern Africa (2012). Water as a risk to business. Sustainable Development Forum, Position Paper 6.
Kissinger, G. (2013). Reducing Risk: Landscape Approaches to Sustainable Sourcing. SAB Miller Case Study. EcoAgriculture Partners, Washington, DC.
Macfarlane, D. M. & Muller, P. J. (2011) Blesbokspruit Ramsar Management Plan: draft. Report prepared for the Department of Environmental Affairs.
Madsen, B., Carroll, N., Kandy, D., & Bennett, G. (2011). State of biodiversity markets report: offset and compensation programs worldwide. Available at: www.thegef.org/gef/sites/thegef.org/files/publication/Bio-Markets-2011.pdf (accessed December 2013).
McCarthy, T. (2011). The impact of acid mine drainage in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 107(5/6), art 712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nel, J., le Maitre, D. C., Forsyth, G., Theron, A., & Archibald, S. (2011). Understanding the Implication of Global Change for the Insurance Industry: The Eden Case Study. CSIR, Stellenbosch.
Njenga, N. & Muigai, P. (2013). Case studies on remuneration of positive externalities (RPE)/Payments for environmental services (PES): engaging local business in PES – Lessons from Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Prepared for the Multi-stakeholder Dialogue 12–13 September 2013, FAO. Available at: www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pes-project/docs/FAO_RPE-PES_WWF-Kenya.pdf (last accessed 7 January 2014).
Otto-Mentz, V., de Meyer, H., Lee, E., et al. (2011). Insurance in a changing landscape. Report by the research partnership between the Santam Group, the WWF, the University of Cape Town and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Rodriguez, L. C., et al. (2010). Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach. Ecological Economics 69 (6), 1237–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrings, C., Brock, W. A., Chopra, K., et al. (2009). The economics of biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Naeem, S., Bunker, D., Hector, A., et al. (eds), Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning and Ecosystem Services. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Perrot-Maître, D. (2006). The Vittel Payments for Ecosystem Services: A ‘Perfect’ PES Case? IIED, London.
Ramontja, T., Coetzee, H., Hobbs, P. J., et al. (2010). Mine water management in the Witwatersand Gold Fields with special emphasis on acid mine drainage. Report to the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Acid Mine Drainage.
Ruhl, J. B., Kraft, S. E., & Lant, C. L. (2007). The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Stephenson, J., Elstein, S., Huntley, C., et al. (2007). Climate change: financial risks to federal and private insurers in coming decades are potentially significant. Report to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, US Senate. GAO-07–285.
United Nations Environment Programme (2012). Global Environment Outlook 5 (GEO-5): Environment for the Future we Want. UNEP, Nairobi.
von Bormann, T. (2014). Understanding the Food Energy Water Nexus: Through the Water and Food Lens. WWF-SA, South Africa.
Waage, S. & Kester, C. (2014). Making the invisible visible: analytical tools for assessing business impacts & dependencies upon ecosystem services. BSR's Environmental Services Working Group.
World Water Assessment Programme (2014). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2014: Water and Energy. UNESCO, Paris.
Zhang, C.-B., Wang, J., Liu, W.-L., et al. (2010). Effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and community metabolic profiles in a full-scale constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering 36, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×