Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T04:43:30.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Water, biodiversity and ecosystems: reducing our impact

from Part I - Understanding ‘water’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Caroline A. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Southern Cross University
Jay O'Keeffe
Affiliation:
UNESCO-IHE, The Netherlands
R. Quentin Grafton
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Karen Hussey
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The continued pressure of water abstraction to support human development has been devastating aquatic biodiversity and ecosystems across the world (Vörösmarty et al., 2010; Steffen et al., 2002; Ramankutty et al., 2008). At the same time, deteriorating water quality and rising water temperatures reduce habitat potential, rapidly killing aquatic species. Riparian zones are cleared and paved, and marginal habitats, rich in biodiversity, are easily lost. While an assessment of the economic value of these zones can be made, it can never reflect the complexity and the ecological unknowns which are inherent in human decisions about how land and water should be used and managed.

By incorporating ecosystem and biodiversity values into our macroeconomic processes, we can design and operate a sustainable water system. To do this, we must become much more efficient in the way we manage our water resources: we must ensure that these systems are fully embedded into the natural ecosystem within which they are placed, and that ecosystem services available there are utilised to the full, without compromising their own integrity. In this way, the ecosystem services of the whole catchment will remain in place, generating a sustainable flow of benefits into the future.

If we fail to do this, however, we face a future where water becomes an increasingly scarce resource, with some rivers providing little utility other than as a drain to carry away pollutants. For groundwater, overpumping will force water tables down, making them inaccessible to most communities (Shiklomanov and Rodda, 2003).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acreman, M., Harding, R., Sullivan, C. A.et al. (2009). Review of Issues on Water Storage in International Development. Wallingford, UK: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and British Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R.et al. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity and the environment. Science, 268, 520–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunn, S. E. and Arthington, A. H. (2002). Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management, 30 (1), 492–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapin, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T.et al. (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405, 234–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, A. and Radcliffe, N. (1997). Sustainability: A Systems Approach. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskinet, R.G., Sutton, P. and Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, H. (1999). Ecological Economics and the Ecology of Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Delbaere, B. (2004). European policy review: starting to achieve the 2010 biodiversity target. Journal of Nature Conservation, 12, 141–42.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. and Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1902–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. H.et al. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81, 163–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerton, L. and Bos, E. (2004). Value: Counting Ecosystems as an Economic Part of Water. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
,European Commission (EC) (2000). ‘Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2000/60/EC Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy.’ Luxembourg: European Parliament.
Gilman, T. A., Abell, R. A. and Williams, C. E. (2004). How can conservation biology inform the practice of Integrated River Basin Management?International Journal of River Basin Management, 2, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J. (1996). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Jackson, Tennessee, USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J.et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,ICWE (International Conference on Water and the Environment) (1992). The Dublin Statement and Record of the Conference. Geneva: WMO.Google Scholar
,IEG (Independent Evaluation Group) (2010). World Bank Lending for Large Dams: A Preliminary Review of Impacts. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. C., Acreman, M. C., Dunbar, M. J.et al. (2009). The British river of the future: how climate change and human activity might affect two contrasting river ecosystems in England. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 4787–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, R. K. (1995). The economic multiplier of environmental life support: can capital substitute for a degraded environment?Ecological Economics, 12, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzig, A. P., Pacala, S. W. and Tilman, D. (2002). The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Loomis, J. B. and Gonsalez-Caban, A. (1998). A willingness to pay function for protecting acres of spotted owl habitat from fire. Ecological Economics, 25, 315–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P.et al. (2001). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, 804–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, R. M. (2002). The future of biological diversity in a crowded world. Current Science, 82, 1325–31.Google Scholar
McCann, K. S. (2000). The diversity-stability debate. Nature, 405, 228–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCully, P. (1996). Silenced Rivers: The Ecology and Politics of Large Dams. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
,MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Milly, P. C. D., Wetherald, R. T., Dunne, K. A. and Delworth, T. L. (2002). Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature, 415, 514–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molden, D. (ed.) (2007). Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London: Earthscan.
Noss, R. F. (1990). Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology, 4, 355–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oki, T. and Kanae, S. (2006). Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science, 313, 1068–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Postel, S. and Richter, B. (2003). Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Postel, S. L. (1998). Water for food production: will there be enough in 2025?BioScience, 48, 629–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C. and Foley, J. A. (2008). Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22, GB1003, doi: 10.1029/2007GB002952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, B. D. and Gregory, A. T. (2007). Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations. Ecology and Society, 12 (1), 12 [online].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K.et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14 (2), 32 [online].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. L., Shafroth, P. B. and Auble, G. T. (1999). Responses of riparian cottonwoods to alluvial water table declines. Environmental Management, 23, 347–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiklomanov, I. A. and Rodda, J. C. (2003). World Water Resources at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Cambridge: UNESCO and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776). An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 4th edn, 3 volumes. London: Strahan and Cadell.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Jaeger, J., Carson, D. J. and Bradshaw, C. (ed.) (2002). Challenges of a Changing Earth. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRef
Stern, N., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V.et al. (2006). Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Sullivan, C. A., Macfarlane, D., Dickens, C.et al. (2008). Keeping the Benefits Flowing and Growing: Quantifying the Benefits of Wetlands in the Upper Orange Senqu Basin. Handbook for the EU NeWater Project, INR South Africa.Google Scholar
Sullivan, C. A. (2002). Using an income accounting framework to value non-timber forest products. In Valuing the Environment in Developing Countries, eds. Pearce, D., Pearce, C. and Palmer, C.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sullivan, C. A. (1999). Linking the past with the future: maintaining livelihood strategies for indigenous forest dwellers in Guyana. In Sustainability?–Life Chances and Livelihoods, ed. Redclift, M.. London: Routledge, pp. 158–88.Google Scholar
Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M. and Chang, A. (2008). An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 9457–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,TEEB (2008). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: An Interim Report. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) study. Cambridge, UK: European Communities.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. (2000). Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature, 405, 208–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,UNESCO (2003). The United Nations World Water Development Report: Water for People, Water for Life. World Water Assessment Program, UNESCO.Google Scholar
,UNESCO (2006). The 2nd United Nations World Water Development Report: Water, A Shared Responsibility. World Water Assessment Program, UNESCO.Google Scholar
,UNESCO (2009). The 3rd United Nations World Water Development Report: Water in a Changing World. World Water Assessment Program, UNESCO.Google Scholar
Vaughn, C. (2010). Biodiversity losses and ecosystem function in freshwaters: emerging conclusions and research directions. BioScience, 60, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenko, J. and Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science, 277, 494–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B.Gessner, M. O.et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity, Nature, 467 (7315), 555–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, B. H., Barrett, S., Galaz, V.et al. (2009). Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science, 325 (5946), 1345–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, J. S., Acreman, M. C. and Sullivan, C. A. (2003). The sharing of water between society and ecosystems: from conflict to catchment-based co-management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 358, 2011–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfenson, J. (2000). Final Closing Remarks. The Hague: World Water Forum.Google Scholar
Bank, World (2010). Water and Development: An Evaluation of World Bank Support, 1997–2007. Washington D.C.: Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,World Commission on Dams (WCD) (2000). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. Report of the World Commission on Dams, Cape Town: World Commission on Dam.Google Scholar
,WWF (2006). Free-Flowing Rivers: Economic Luxury or Ecological Necessity? Global Freshwater Programme. Netherlands: WWF Zeist.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×