Temporary Disruption
We have implemented additional assurance measures to protect our systems.
As a result, we have suspended some of our systems and services. We apologise for any temporary disruption some customers may experience.
Element contents
Series: Elements in Political Philosophy
Political Meritocracy in the 21st Century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 November 2025
Summary
Political meritocrats believe political power should be allocated according to virtue and competence. It is an old idea, going back at least to Plato. But what is old is new again, as several political philosophers have recently proposed and defended novel articulations of this ancient idea. The purpose of this short monograph is to offer a critical overview of this literature. I cover three schools of thought. I first look at epistocracy, a form of government identical to modern liberal democracies, except voting power is allocated to citizens according to competence. I then turn to Confucian meritocracy, where more blatantly nondemocratic forms of political meritocracy are defended. I finally look at democratic meritocracy, which is the idea that elections either do or could (if they were appropriately reformed) select virtuous and competent leaders. I end by offering reasons to think the entire enterprise of political meritocracy rests on a mistake.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Political PhilosophyOnline ISBN: 9781009605854Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 08 January 2026
References
Daron, Acemoglu, Naidu, Suresh, Restrepo, Pascual, and Robinson, James A.. 2019. “Democracy Does Cause Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 127: 47–100.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlstrom-Vij, Kristoffer. 2022. “The Case for Modelled Democracy.” Episteme 19: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Danielle. 2023. Justice by Means of Democracy. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin and Wielen, Ryan J. Vander. 2023. “Do Voters Prefer Educated Candidates? How Candidate Education Influences Vote Choice in Congressional Elections.” Electoral Studies 82: 102596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcidiacono, Peter, Bayer, Patrick, and Hizmo, Aurel. 2010. “Beyond Signaling and Human Capital: Education and the Revelation of Ability.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2: 76–104.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. 2016. “Elitism.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Volume 2, edited by Sobel, David, Vallentyne, Peter, and Wall, Steven : 156–184. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bagg, Samuel. 2018. “The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy.” American Political Science Review 112: 891–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagg, Samuel. 2024. “Sortition as Anti-corruption: Popular Oversight against Elite Capture.” American Journal of Political Science 68: 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, Tongdong. 2013. “A Confucian Version of Hybrid Regime: How Does It Work, and Why Is It Superior?” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by Bell, Daniel A. and Li, Chenyang : 55–87. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, Tongdong. 2020. Against Political Equality: The Confucian Case. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J. 1973. “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model.” Public Choice 14: 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Max H. and Tenbrunsel, Ann E.. 2011. Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel A. 2000. East Meets West: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel A. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel A. 2015. The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel A. and Pei, Wang. 2020. Just Hierarchy: Why Social Hierarchies Matter in China and the Rest of the World. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, Jonathan. 2024. Intelligent Democracy: Answering the New Democratic Skepticism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy. 2005. “Political Selection.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy. 2007. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timothy, Besley, Montalvo, Jose G., and Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2011. “Do Educated Leaders Matter?” Economic Journal 121: F205–F207.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy and Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2011. “Do Democracies Select More Educated Leaders?” American Political Science Review 105: 552–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Udit. 2020. “Rethinking the Epistemic Case against Epistocracy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23: 706–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Udit. 2022. “Indirect Elections as a Constitutional Device of Epistocracy.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 20: 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bó, Ernesto Dal and Finan, Frederico. 2018. “Progress and Perspectives in the Study of Political Selection.” Annual Review of Economics 10: 541–575.Google Scholar
Bó, Ernesto Dal, Finan, Frederico, Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten, and Rickne, Johanna. 2017. “Who Becomes a Politician?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 132: 1877–1914.Google Scholar
Bova, Russell. 1997. “Democracy and Liberty: The Cultural Connection.” Journal of Democracy 8: 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, Mark and Wille, Anchrit. 2017. Diploma Democracy: The Rise of Political Meritocracy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braendle, Thomas. 2016. “Do Institutions Affect Citizens’ Selection into Politics?” Journal of Economic Surveys 30: 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey. 1998. “Selection and the Currency of Reward.” In The Theory of Institutional Design, edited by Goodin, Robert E. : 256–276. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Hamlin, Alan. 2000. Democratic Devices and Desires. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Lomasky, Loren. 1997. Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Pettit, Philip. 2005. The Economy of Esteem: An Essay on Civil and Political Society. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jason. 2011. “The Right to a Competent Electorate.” Philosophical Quarterly 61: 700–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jason. 2018. “Does the Demographic Objection to Epistocracy Succeed?” Res Publica 24: 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jason. 2021. “In Defense of Epistocracy: Enlightened Preference Voting.” In The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology, edited by Hannon, Michael and de Ridder, Jeroen : 374–383. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jason and Freiman, Christopher. 2022. “Why Paternalists Must Endorse Epistocracy.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 21: 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jason and Landemore, Hélène. 2022. Debating Democracy: Do We Need More or Less? Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Matthias. 2018. “The Concept of Political Competence.” Critical Review 30: 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caesar, James W. 1979. Presidential Selection: Theory and Development. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, Bryan. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph. 2007. “Democracy and Meritocracy: Toward a Confucian Perspective.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34: 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Joseph. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2015. “Voter Ignorance Is Not Necessarily a Problem.” Critical Review 27: 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Andreas T. 2023. “Voter Incompetence and the Legitimacy of Representative Democracy.” In Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (Online First).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maaike, Cima, Tonnaer, Franca, and Hauser, Marc D.. 2010. “Psychopaths Know Right from Wrong but Don’t Care.” Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience 5: 59–67.Google Scholar
Carpini, Delli, Michael, X. and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Doris, John M. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 2022. America’s Frozen Neighborhoods: The Abuse of Zoning. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Englert, Gianna. 2024. Democracy Tamed: French Liberalism and the Politics of Suffrage. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, David. 2015. “Against Public Reason.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Volume 1, edited by Sobel, David, Vallentyne, Peter, and Wall, Steven : 112–142. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Estlund, David. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Estlund, David. 2021. “Epistocratic Paternalism.” In Political Epistemology, edited by Edenberg, Elizabeth and Hannon, Michael : 97–113. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers-Hillstrom, Karl. 2019. “State of Money in Politics: The Price of Victory is Steep.” Open Secrets. www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/02/state-of-money-in-politics-the-price-of-victory-is-steep/.Google Scholar
Fan, Ruiping. 2013. “Confucian Meritocracy for Contemporary China.” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by Daniel, A. Bell and Li, Chenyang : 88–115. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, Mercier, Hugo, and Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2023. “Analytical Democratic Theory: A Microfoundational Approach.” American Political Science Review 117: 767–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, edited by Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard : 55–97. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feddersen, Timothy, Gailmard, Sean, and Sandroni, Alvaro. 2009. “Moral Bias in Large Elections: Theory and Experimental Evidence.” American Political Science Review 103: 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fumagalli, Corrado. 2023. “Stability in Liberal Epistocracies.” Social Epistemology 37: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funder, David C. 1999. Personality Judgment: A Realistic Approach to Person Perception. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Galasso, Vincenzo and Nannicini, Tommaso. 2011. “Competing on Good Politicians.” American Political Science Review 105: 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John and Veenendaal, Wouter. 2020. Population and Politics: The Impact of Scale. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giavazzi, Michele. 2024. “Political Equality and Epistemic Constraints on Voting.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 52: 147–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Adam. 2021. “Political Disagreement and Minimal Epistocracy.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 19: 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Adam. 2022a. “Is Epistocracy Irrational?” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 21: 251–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Adam. 2022b. “On Epistocracy’s Epistemic Problem: Reply to Méndez.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11: 1–7.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Adam. 2023. “Political Ignorance Is Both Rational and Radical.” Synthese 202: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Adam. 2025. “Epistocracy and the Problem of Political Capture.” Public Affairs Quarterly 39: 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., Gyourko, Joseph, and Saks, Raven E.. 2005. “Why Is Manhattan So Expensive? Regulation and the Rise of Housing Prices.” Journal of Law and Economics 48: 331–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. Nolan. 2022. Arbitrary Lines: How Zoning Broke the American City and How to Fix It. Island Press.Google Scholar
Gunia, Brian C., Barnes, Christoper M., and Sah, Sunita. 2014. “The Morality of Lark and Owls: Unethical Behavior Depends on Chronotype as Well as Time of Day.” Psychological Science 25: 2272–2274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Andrew B. and Yoder, Jesse. 2022. “Does Homeownership Influence Political Behavior? Evidence from Administrative Data.” Journal of Politics 84: 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. 2001. The Federalist, edited by Carey, George W. and McClellan, James. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hankins, James. 2023. Political Meritocracy in Renaissance Italy: The Virtuous Republic of Francesco Patrizi of Siena. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hannon, Michael. 2022. “Are Knowledgeable Voters Better Voters?” Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 21: 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, James. 2008. The Commonwealth of Oceana and a System of Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Eirik Lang. 2020. “A Han Feizian Worry with Confucian Meritocracy – and a Non-Moral Alternative.” Culture and Dialogue 8: 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Ann H., Kirk, Ulrich, Denfield, George H., and Montague, P. Read. 2010. “Monetary Favor and Their Influence on Neural Responses and Revealed Preferences.” Journal of Neuroscience 30: 9597–9602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, Robin. 1998. “More Votes for Ph.D.’s.” Journal of Social Philosophy 29: 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y. and Rahat, Gideon. 2010. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baogang, He and Warren, Mark E.. 2020. “Can Meritocracy Replace Democracy? A Conceptual Framework.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 46: 1093–1112.Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph. 2020. Morality, Competition, and the Firm: The Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hédoin, Cyril. 2021. “The ‘Epistemic Critique’ of Epistocracy and Its Inadequacy.” Social Epistemology 35: 502–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hédoin, Cyril. 2023. “Liberal Perfectionism and Epistocracy.” Public Affairs Quarterly 37: 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herreros, Francisco. 2006. “Screening before Sanctioning: Elections and the Republican Tradition.” European Journal of Political Theory 5: 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1969. The Idea of a Party System: The Rise of Legitimate Opposition in the United States, 1780–1840. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Sean and Wiens, David. 2021. “Demographic Objections to Epistocracy: A Generalization.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 49: 323–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1813. “Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, October 28, 1813.” Retrieved from the Library of Congress. www.loc.gov/resource/mtj1.046_1276_1282/?sp=2&st=text.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Anne. 2018. “Limited Epistocracy and Political Inclusion.” Episteme 15: 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokela, Markus, Meriläinen, Jaakko, Tukiainen, Janne, and von Schoultz, Ǻsa. 2023. “Personality Traits and Cognitive Ability in Political Selection.” Aboa Center for Economics Discussion Paper no. 152. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4166034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Garrett. 2020. 10% Less Democracy: Why You Should Trust Elites a Little More and the Masses a Little Less. Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. 2020. Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. 2018. Democracy after Virtue: Toward Pragmatic Confucian Democracy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. 2020. “The Challenge of Confucian Political Meritocracy: A Critical Introduction.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 46: 1005–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. 2023. Confucian Constitutionalism: Dignity, Rights, and Democracy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. 2024. “Service, Reciprocity, and Remedy: From Confucian Meritocracy to Confucian Democracy.” European Journal of Political Theory 23: 246–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klocksiem, Justin. 2019. “Epistocracy Is a Wolf in Wolf’s Clothing.” Journal of Ethics 23: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogelmann, . 2015. “Modeling the Individual for Constitutional Choice.” Constitutional Political Economy 26: 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogelmann, Brian. 2021. Secret Government: The Pathologies of Publicity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogelmann, Brian. 2023b. “In Defense of Knavish Constitutions.” Public Choice 196: 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogelmann, Brian. 2023c. “In Defense of (Limited) Oligarchy.” Public Affairs Quarterly 37: 352–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogelmann, Brian and Carroll, Jeffrey. 2024. “There Is No Right to a Competent Electorate.” Inquiry (Online First).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouchaki, Maryam and Smith, Isaac H.. 2014. “The Morning Morality Effect: The Influence of Time of Day on Unethical Behavior.” Psychological Science 25: 95–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landa, Dimitri and Pevnick, Ryan. 2020. “Representative Democracy as Defensible Epistocracy.” American Political Science Review 114: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenyang, Li. 2009. “Where Does Confucian Virtuous Leadership Stand?” Philosophy East and West 59: 531–536.Google Scholar
Zhuoyao, Li. 2018. “The Discontents of Moderate Political Confucianism and the Future of Democracy in East Asia.” Philosophy East and West 68: 1193–1218.Google Scholar
López-Guerra, Claudio. 2014. Democracy and Disenfranchisement: The Morality of Electoral Exclusions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucky, Matthew C. 2024. “Knowledge-Making in Politics: Expertise in Democracy and Epistocracy.” Political Theory 52: 431–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mang, Franz. 2018. “Confucianism, Perfectionism, and Liberal Society.” Dao 17: 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mang, Franz. 2020. “Political Meritocracy and its Betrayal.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 46: 1113–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Jennifer E. 2021. Members of the 117th Congress: A Profile (CRS Report R46705). Retrieved from Congressional Research Services website: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46705.Google Scholar
Manor, Aylon. 2022. “Polycentric Limited Epistocracy: Political Expertise and the Wiki-Model.” Episteme 19: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97: 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2009. “A ‘Selection Model’ of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2016. “A Contingency Theory of Accountability.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E., and Schillemans, Thomas : 55–68. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marble, William and Nall, Clayton. 2021. “Where Self-interest Trumps Ideology: Liberal Homeowners and Local Opposition to Housing Development.” Journal of Politics 83: 1747–1763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez, María Pía. 2022. “An Epistemic Problem for Epistocracy.” Social Epistemology 36: 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 2015. On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Other Essays, edited by Philp, Mark and Rosen, Frederick. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, Ichisada. 1981. China’s Examination Hell: The Civil Service Examinations of Imperial China. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moraro, Piero. 2018. “Against Epistocracy.” Social Theory and Practice 44: 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyo, Dambisa. 2018. Edge of Chaos: Why Democracy Is Failing to Deliver Economic Growth – and How to Fix It. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Thomas. 2015. “On the Compatibility of Epistocracy and Public Reason.” Social Theory and Practice 41: 458–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, Thomas. 2018. “Plural Voting for the Twenty-First Century.” Philosophical Quarterly 68: 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Lynette H. 2016. “What Exactly Is ‘The Chinese Ideal?’” Perspectives on Politics 14: 147–161.Google Scholar
Oprea, Alexandra and Stephens, Daniel J.. 2024. “A Minimal Standard of Democratic Competence.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics (Online First).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pei, Wang. 2017. “Debates on Political Meritocracy in China: A Historical Perspective.” Philosophy and Public Issues 7: 53–71.Google Scholar
Plato. 1997. Complete Works, edited by Cooper, John M. and Douglas, S. Hutchinson. Hackett.Google Scholar
Qing, Jiang. 2013. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Julian. 2019. “Expertise, Agreement, and the Nature of Social Scientific Facts, or: against Epistocracy.” Social Epistemology 33: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can’t Coexist. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 2008. On the Side of Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph Joseph 1995a. “Democracies are Less Warlike Than Other Regimes.” European Journal of International Relations 1: 457–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph Joseph 1995b. “Democracy, Power, Genocide, and Mass Murder.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 39: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, Steven Sprick. 2020. “Does Campaign Spending Affect Election Outcomes? New Evidence from Transaction-Level Disbursement Data.” Journal of Politics 82: 1502–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2014. “The Moral Behavior of Ethicists and the Role of the Philosopher.” In Experimental Ethics: Toward an Empirical Moral Philosophy, edited by Luetge, Christoph, Rusch, Hannes, and Uhl, Matthias : 59–64. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. “Democracy as a Universal Value.” Journal of Democracy 10: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaker, Lee. 2012. “Local Political Knowledge and Assessments of Citizen Competence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76: 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull. 2013. “How East Asians View Meritocracy: A Confucian Perspective.” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by Daniel, A. Bell and Li, Chenyang : 259–287. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Volume I. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Somin, Ilya. 2013. Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, Geroge J. and Becker, Gary S.. 1977. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.” American Economic Review 67: 76–90.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1997. “‘Improving Ratings’: Audit in the British University System.” European Review 5: 305–321.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Sor-Hoon. 2009. “Beyond Elitism: A Community Ideal for a Modern East Asia.” Philosophy East and West 59: 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Richard H. and Sunstein, Cass R.. 2021. Nudge: The Final Edition. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, Daniel M., Feigenbaum, James J., Hall, Andrew B., and Yoder, Jesse. 2019. “Who Becomes a Member of Congress? Evidence from De-Anonymized Census Data.” NBER Worker Paper 26156. www.nber.org/papers/w26156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, Zhichao. 2024. “The Epistemic Value of Democratic Meritocracy.” Social Epistemology 38: 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trantidis, Aris and Cowen, Nick. 2024. “Is Public Ignorance a Problem? An Epistemic Defense of Really Existing Democracies.” Political Research Quarterly 77: 759–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbers, Lachlan Montgomery. 2019. “Democratic Legitimacy and the Competence Objection.” Res Publica 25: 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallier, Kevin. 2022. “Public Justification.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/justification-public/.Google Scholar
Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2023. “Strengthening the Epistemic Case against Epistocracy and for Democracy.” Social Epistemology 37: 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian. 2007. Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2016. Political Political Theory: Essays on Institutions. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Andrew. 1995. “Human Capital vs Signaling Explanations of Wages.” Journal of Economics Perspectives 9: 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Baldwin. 2019. “A Non-Sectarian Comprehensive Confucianism? – On Kim’s Public Reason Confucianism.” Journal of Social Philosophy 50: 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Baldwin. 2025. “Trapped between Apathy and Anger: On the Problem of Instability in Confucian Meritocracy.” Journal of Politics 87: 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Hong and Chenyang, Li. 2013. “China’s Meritocratic Examinations and the Ideal of Virtuous Talents.” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by Daniel, A. Bell and Li, Chenyang : 340–362. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziliotti, Elena. 2017. “The Moral Basis of Political Meritocracy.” Philosophy and Public Issues 7: 246–270.Google Scholar
Ziliotti, Elena. 2020. “Political Meritocracy and the Troubles of Western Democracies.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 46: 1127–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziliotti, Elena. 2023. “An Epistemic Case for Confucian Democracy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26: 1005–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziliotti, Elena. 2024. Meritocratic Democracy: A Cross-Cultural Political Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this Element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 5
- Cited by