Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Continuous and Discrete Adjoint Approach Based on Lattice Boltzmann Method in Aerodynamic Optimization Part I: Mathematical Derivation of Adjoint Lattice Boltzmann Equations

  • Mohamad Hamed Hekmat (a1) and Masoud Mirzaei (a1)

The significance of flow optimization utilizing the lattice Boltzmann (LB) method becomes obvious regarding its advantages as a novel flow field solution method compared to the other conventional computational fluid dynamics techniques. These unique characteristics of the LB method form the main idea of its application to optimization problems. In this research, for the first time, both continuous and discrete adjoint equations were extracted based on the LB method using a general procedure with low implementation cost. The proposed approach could be performed similarly for any optimization problem with the corresponding cost function and design variables vector. Moreover, this approach was not limited to flow fields and could be employed for steady as well as unsteady flows. Initially, the continuous and discrete adjoint LB equations and the cost function gradient vector were derived mathematically in detail using the continuous and discrete LB equations in space and time, respectively. Meanwhile, new adjoint concepts in lattice space were introduced. Finally, the analytical evaluation of the adjoint distribution functions and the cost function gradients was carried out.

Corresponding author
Corresponding author. Email:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

[3] R. Mittal and G. Iaccarino , Immersed boundary methods, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 37 (2005), pp. 239261.

[5] A. Jameson , Computational aerodynamics for aircraft design, Science, 245 (1989), pp. 361371.

[9] M. H. Hekmat , M. Mirzaei and E. Izadpanah , Constrained and non-constrained aerodynamic optimization using the adjoint equations approach, J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 23 (2009), pp. 19111923.

[14] J. B. Freund , Adjointt-based optimization for understanding and suppressing jet noise, Procedia IUTAM J., 1 (2010), pp. 5463.

[15] M. M. Tekitek , M. Bouzidi , F. Dubois and P. Lallemand , Adjoint lattice Boltzmann equation for parameter identification, Comput. Fluids, 35 (2006), pp. 805813.

[16] G. Pingen , A. Evgrafov and K. Maute , Topology optimization of flow domains using the lattice Boltzmann method, Struct Multidisc Optim J., 34 (2007), pp. 507524.

[17] G. Pingen , A. Evgrafov and K. Maute , Parameter Sensitivity analysis for the hydrodynamic lattice Boltzmann method with application, J. Comput. Fluids, 38 (2009), pp. 910923.

[18] M. J. Krause , G. Thater and V. Heuveline , Adjoint-based fluid flow control and optimization with lattice Boltzmann methods, Comput. Math. Appl., 65 (2013), pp. 945960.

[19] W. Gladrow AND A. Dieter , Lattice-Gas Cellular Automata and Lattice Boltzmann Models: an Introduction, Heidelberg, Springer, 2000.

[20] P. L. Bhatnagar , E. P. Gross and M. Krook , A model for collision processes in gases I. small amplitude processes in charged and neutral one-component systems, J. Phys. Rev., 94(3) (1954), pp. 511525.

[22] Z. Guo , C. Zheng and B. Shi , Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice Boltzmann method, Phys. Rev. E, 65(4) (2002), pp. 16.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
  • ISSN: 2070-0733
  • EISSN: 2075-1354
  • URL: /core/journals/advances-in-applied-mathematics-and-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 8th April 2017 - 21st July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.