Skip to main content
×
×
Home

An experimental and numerical investigation of under-expanded turbulent jets

  • A. J. Saddington (a1), N. J. Lawson (a1) and K. Knowles (a1)
Abstract

The work described here concentrates on under-expanded, axisym-metric turbulent jets issuing into quiescent conditions. Under-expanded turbulent jets are applicable to most aircraft propulsion applications that use convergent nozzles. Experimental studies used laser doppler velocimetry (LDV) and pitot probe measurements along the jet centreline. These measurements were made for two nozzle pressure ratios (2·5 and 4·0) and at various streamwise positions up to 10 nozzle diameters downstream of the nozzle exit plane. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed using the Fluent code and utilised the RNG K-ε two-equation turbulence model. A mesh resolution of approximately one hundredth of nozzle exit diameter was found to be sufficient to establish a mesh independent solution.

Comparison of the jet centreline axial velocity (LDV data) and pressure ratio (pitot probe data) showed good agreement with the CFD model. The correct number of shock cells had been predicted and the shock strength agreed well between the experiments and numerical model. The CFD model was, however, found to over-predict the shock cell length resulting in a longer supersonic core. There was some evidence, based on analysis of the LDV measurements that indicates the presence of swirl and jet unsteadiness, which could contribute to a shortening of the shock cell length. These effects were not modelled in the CFD. Correlation between the LDV and pitot probe measurements was generally good, however, there was some evidence that probe interference may have caused the premature decay of the jet. Overall, this work has indicated the good agreement between a CFD simulation using the RNG k-ε turbulence model and experimental data when applied to the prediction of the flowfield generated by under-expanded turbulent jets. The suitability of the LDV technique to jet flows with velocities up to 500ms-1 has also been demonstrated.

Copyright
References
Hide All
1. Pinker, R.A. and Strange, P.J.R. The noise benefits of forced mixing, proceedings of the 4th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Toulouse, France, 2-4 June 1998, Paper No. AIAA-98-2256.
2. Bevilaqua, P.M. Advances in ejector thrust augmentation, Proceedings of the International Powered Lift Conference, Santa Clara, California, USA, 7–10 December 1987, pp 201215.
3 Rao, G.A. and Mahulikar, S.P. Integrated review of stealth technology and its role in airpower, Aeronaut J, December 2002, 106, (1066), pp. 629641.
4. Donaldson, C.D. and Snedeker, R.S. A study of free jet impingement. Part 1. mean properties of free and impinging jets, J Fluid Mechanics, 1971, 45, (2), pp 281319.
5. Stickland, M.T. RA98 (CHAM Nozzle) Flow survey of underexpanded supersonic jets in the 5·5m low speed wind tunnel static test facility – Volume 2, Technical Report BAe-WWT-RPRES-AXR-139, BAe plc., April 1988.
6. Kalghatgi, G.T., Cousins, J.M., and Bray, K.N.C. Crossed beam measurements and model predictions in a rocket exhaust plume, combustion and flame, 1981, 43, pp 5167.
7. Chuech, S.G., Lai, M.C., and Faeth, G. M. Structure of turbulent sonic underexpanded free jets, AIAA J, May 1989, 27, (5), pp 549559.
8. Love, E.S., Grigsby, C.E., Lee, L.P. and Woodling, M.J. Experimental and theoretical studies of axisymmetric free jets, Technical Report R-6, NASA, 1958.
9. Knowles, K. and Wong, R.Y.T. Passive control of entrainment in supersonic jets, RAeS Aerodynamics Research Conference, London, 17-18 April 2000, pp 9.19.14.
10. Wong, R.Y.T. Enhancement of supersonic jet mixing, PhD thesis, Department of Aerospace, Power and Sensors, Cranfield University, July 2000.
11. Rodi, W. Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics – A state of the art review, International Association for Hydraulic Research, Rotterdamseweg 185 – PO Box 177, 2600 MH Delft, The Netherlands, 2nd ed., 1984.
12. Yakhot, A. and Orszag, S.A. Renormalisation group analysis of turbulence: I. Basic theory, J of Scientific Computing, 1986, 1, (1), pp 151.
13. Knowles, K. and Saddington, A.J. Modelling and experiments on underexpanded turbulent jet mixing, 5th International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurement, Mallorca, Spain, 16–18 September 2002.
14. Ashkenas, H. and Sherman, F.S. Structure and utilization of supersonic free jets in low density wind tunnels, Contractor Report CR-60423, NASA, 1964.
15. Dring, R. P. Sizing criteria for laser anemometry particles, J Fluids Engineering, 1982, 104, pp.1517.
16. Rockwell, D. Oscillations of impinging Shear Layers, AIAA J, 1983, 21, (5), pp. 645664.
17. Smith, R. An Investigation of supersonic swirling jets, Aeronaut Q, August 1973, 24, pp 167178.
18. Birkby, P. and Page, G.J. Numerical predictions of turbulent underex-panded sonic jets using a pressure-based methodology, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2001, 215, (G), pp 165173.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Aeronautical Journal
  • ISSN: 0001-9240
  • EISSN: 2059-6464
  • URL: /core/journals/aeronautical-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 101 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th October 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.