Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Lay theories of quality of life in older age

  • ANN BOWLING (a1) and ZAHAVA GABRIEL (a1)
Abstract

This paper presents findings from a national survey of quality of life (QoL) in older age. The main aim of the analyses was to examine the definitions of quality of life given by people aged 65 or more years and the underlying reasons. Open-ended questions were used to elicit their perceptions of QoL. These were followed by structured measures of self-rated QoL overall, and of domains of QoL commonly reported in the literature. The main things said by the respondents to give their lives quality were categorised into ‘themes’. These were: social relationships; social roles and activities; leisure activities enjoyed alone; health; psychological outlook and wellbeing; home and neighbourhood; financial circumstances; and independence. The reasons people gave to explain why these things were important to their QoL focused on: the freedom to do the things they wanted to do without restriction (whether in the home or socially); pleasure, enjoyment and satisfaction with life; mental harmony; social attachment and having access to companionship, intimacy, love, social contact and involvement, help; social roles; and feeling secure. This paper also presents data that demonstrates the ability of theoretically informed, structured survey indicators of QoL to predict respondents' self-rated overall QoL. Logistic regression analyses showed that most of these indicators were strong, independent predictors of self-ratings of QoL, although those that were not significant in the model did not fully incorporate lay reasons of QoL in their measurement scales. In conclusion, the indicators which were not significant in the model did not fully incorporate lay values in their measurement properties. It is also likely that those indicators that were significant could have been improved.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence:Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Hampstead Campus, London NW3 2PF. email: a.bowling@ucl.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Andrews, F. M. (ed.) 1986. Research on the Quality of Life. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Andrews, F. M. and Withey, S. B. 1976. Social Indicators of Well-being: American's Perceptions of Life Quality. Plenum, New York.
Atchley, R. C. 1989. The continuity theory of normal aging. The Gerontologist, 29, 183–90.
Baltes, P. B. and Baltes, M. M. (eds) 1990. Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Bengston, V. L. and Schaie, K. W. (eds) 1999. Handbook of Theories of Ageing. Springer Publishing Company, New York.
Berkman, L. F. and Glass, T. 2000. Social integration, social networks, social support and health. In Berkman, L. F. and Kawachi, I. (eds), Social Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 137–73.
Bowling, A. 1994. Social networks and social support among older people and implications for emotional well-being and psychiatric morbidity. International Review of Psychiatry, 9, 447–59.
Bowling, A. 2001. Measuring Disease: A Review of Disease Specific Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Second edition, Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire.
Bowling, A. 2002. Research Methods in Health. Investigating Health and Health Services. Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire.
Bowling, A. 2005 a. Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Third edition, Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire.
Bowling, A. 2005 b. Ageing Well. Quality of Life in Old Age. Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire.
Bowling, A. and Gabriel, Z. 2004. An integrational model of quality of life in older age: a comparison of analytic and lay models of quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 69, 136.
Bowling, A., Banister, D., Sutton, S., Evans, O. and Windsor, J. 2002. A multidimensional model of QoL in older age. Ageing and Mental Health, 6, 355–71.
Bowling, A., Gabriel, Z., Dykes, J., Marriott-Dowding, L., Evans, L., Fleissig, A., Banister, D. and Sutton, S. 2003. Let's ask them: a national survey of definitions of quality of life and its enhancement among people aged 65 and over. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 56, 269306.
Carver, D. J., Chapman, C. A., Thomas, V. S., Stadnyk, K. J. and Rockwood, K. 1999. Validity and reliability of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-20 questionnaire as a measure of quality of life in elderly people living at home. Age and Ageing, 28, 169–74.
Cohen, S. 1988. Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7, 269–97.
Cohen, S. and Syme, S. L. 1985. Issues in the study and application of social support. In Cohen, S. and Syme, S. L. (eds), Social Support and Health. Academic, Orlando, Florida, 122.
Cooper, K., Arber, S., Fee, L. and Ginn, J. 1999. The Influence of Social Support and Social Capital on Health: A Review and Analysis of British Data. Health Education Authority, London.
Cumming, E. and Henry, W. 1961. Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement. Basic, New York.
Donovan, D. and Saunders, C. 2005. Key issues in the analysis of qualitative data in health services research. In Bowling, A. and Ebrahim, S. (eds), Handbook of Health Research Methods: Investigation, Measurement and Analysis. Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire, 515–32.
Doyal, L. and Gough, I. 1991. A Theory of Human Need. Macmillan, London.
Fayers, P. M. and Hand, D. J. 2002. Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Association, 165, 2, 121.
Fisher, B. J. 1995. Successful aging, life satisfaction, and generativity in later life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41, 239–50.
Gabriel, Z. and Bowling, A. 2004. Perspectives on quality of life in older age: older people talking. Ageing and Society, 24, 675–91.
Goldberg, D. P. and Williams, P. 1988. A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, Windsor, Berks.
Grundy, E. and Bowling, A. 1999. Enhancing the quality of extended life years. Identification of the oldest old with a very good and very poor quality of life. Ageing and Mental Health, 3, 199212.
Grundy, E.Bowling, A. and Farquhar, M. 1996. Social support, life satisfaction and survival at older ages. In Casselli, G. and Lopez, A. (eds), Health and mortality among elderly populations. pp. 135–56. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., Mackintosh, A. E. and Fitzpatrick, R. 2004. Health Status and Quality of Life in Older People. A Structured Review of Patient-assessed Health Instruments. Patient-assessed Health Instruments Group, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Higgs, P., Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. and Blane, D. 2003. Researching quality of life in early old age: the importance of the sociological dimension. Social Policy and Administration, 37, 239–52.
Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P. and Blane, D. 2003. A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Ageing and Mental Health, 7, 186–94.
Lau, R. R., Hartman, K. A. and Ware, J. E. 1986. Health as a value: methodological and theoretical considerations. Health Psychology, 5, 2543.
Lawton, M. P. 1982. Competence, environmental press and adaptation of older people. In Lawton, M. P., Windley, P. G. and Byerts, T. O. (eds), Aging and environment. Theoretical approaches. Springer, New York.
Lawton, M. P. 1983 a. Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people. Gerontologist, 23, 349–57.
Lawton, M. P. 1983 b. The varieties of wellbeing. Experimental Aging Research, 9, 6572.
Lawton, M. P. 1991. A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders, In Birren, J. E., Lubben, J., Rowe, J. and Deutchman, D. (eds), The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly. pp. 427. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Lawton, M. P. 1996. Quality of life and affect in later life. In Magai, C. and McFadden, S. H. (eds), Handbook of emotion, human development, and aging. pp. 327–48. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Maslow, A. 1954. Motivation and Personality. Harper, New York.
Maslow, A. H. 1968. Toward a Psychology of Being. 2nd ed.Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey.
Miller, B. and McFall, S. 1991. Stability and change in the informal task social support network of frail older persons. The Gerontologist, 31, 735–45.
O'Boyle, C. A. 1997. Quality of life assessment: a paradigm shift in healthcare? Irish Journal of Psychology, 18, 510–66.
Office for National Statistics 2000. Standard Occupational Classification. ‘Volume 1: Structure and Descriptions of Unit Groups’ and ‘Volume 2: The Coding Index’. Office for National Statistics, London.
Popay, J. 2006. Whose theory is it anyway? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 571–72.
Procidano, M. E. and Heller, K. 1983. Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 124.
Rogerson, R. J., Findlay, A. M., Coombe, M. G. and Morris, A. 1989. Indicators of quality of life. Environment and Planning, 21, 1655–66.
Sarvimäki, A. and Stenbock-Hult, H. B. 2000. Quality of life in old age described as a sense of well-being, meaning and value. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1025–33.
Schwarzer, R. 1993. Measurement of Perceived Self-efficacy: Psychometric Scales for Cross-cultural Research. Institute for Psychology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin.
Scheier, M. F. and Carver, C. S. 1985. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalised outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–47.
Seeman, T. A. and Crimmins, E. 2001. Social environment effects on health and ageing: integrating epidemiological and demographic approaches and perspectives. In Weinstein, M., Hermalin, A. I. and Stoto, M. A. (eds), Population Health and Aging: Strengthening the Dialogue Between Epidemiology and Demography. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 88117.
Seeman, T. E., Lusignolo, T. M., Albert, M. and Berkman, L. 2001. Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high functioning older adults: MacArthur studies of successful ageing. Health Psychology, 20, 243–55.
Sherbourne, C. D. and Stewart, A. L. 1991. The MOS social support survey. Social Science and Medicine, 32, 705–14.
Skevington, S. M. 1999. Measuring quality of life in Britain: introducing the WHOQOL-100. Psychomatic Research, 47, 449–59.
Skevington, S. M., O'Connell, K. A. and the WHOQOL Group. 2004. Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100. Quality of Life Research, 13, 2334.
Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M. and O'Connell, K. A. 2004. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results from international field trials. A report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research, 13, 299310.
Stenner, P. H. D., Cooper, D. and Skevington, S. M. 2003. Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 2161–72.
Townsend, P. 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom. Pelican, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.
Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M. and Gandek, B. 1993. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M. and Gandek, B. 1997. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Revised edition, The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
World Health Organisation. 1993. Measuring Quality of Life: the Development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). WHO, Geneva.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed