Skip to main content
×
Home

Meeting the income needs of older people in East Asia: using housing equity

  • JOHN DOLING (a1) and RICHARD RONALD (a2)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

In the welfare systems of East Asian countries, the income, care and other needs of older people have traditionally been met less by state social protection measures and more by the family, supported by what might be termed the first homeownership strategy: widening access to home ownership as a physical, emotional and financial basis of family wellbeing. Recent political, economic and demographic developments, however, have undermined this model. Examining policy responses in the three most advanced East Asian economies, Japan, Singapore and South Korea, but also with reference to Taiwan, the paper identifies common tendencies in the ways in which the ability to use home ownership has been strengthened. As a second strategy, home ownership has been used to reduce geographical constraints on family support, while, as a third strategy, governments have introduced mechanisms through which older people are able to realise some or all of the equity they have built up through the housing market. These mechanisms include, moving down market or even converting to a rental solution, as well as forms of reverse-mortgage products, some available through private financial institutions and some involving state-organised and state-operated devices.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: John Doling, Institute of Applied Social Studies, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. E-mail: J.F.Doling@bham.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Atsumi N. 2001. Shakai hosho zaigen toshiteno sozoku shisan no katsuyo [Utilization of Inheritance Assets as Social Security Resources]. Fuji Research Institute Corporation Study Report, Tokyo.
Bonoli G. and Shinkawa T. (eds) 2005. Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World: Evidence from Eleven Countries. Edwin Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Building Centre of Japan. 2008. A Quick Look at Housing in Japan. Sixth edition, Building Centre of Japan, Tokyo.
Cabinet Office. 2005. Kokumin Seikatsu Hakusho [Government White Paper on the National Lifestyle]. National Printing Bureau, Tokyo.
Choi Y. J. 2007. Coming to a Standstill: A New Theoretical Idea of East Asian Welfare Regimes. Barnet Papers in Social Research, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Chou K. L., Chow N. W. S. and Chi I. 2006. Willingness to consider applying for reverse mortgage in Hong Kong Chinese middle-aged homeowners. Habitat International, 30, 716–27.
Chua B. H. 2003. Maintaining housing values under the condition of universal homeownership. Housing Studies, 18, 3, 765–80.
Department of Budget Accounting and Statistics. 2003. Taipei City Government Statistical Summary. Department of Budget Accounting and Statistics, Taipei.
Doling J. 1999. Housing policies and the Little Tigers: how do they compare with the other industrialised countries. Housing Studies, 14, 2, 229–50.
Doling J. 2002. The south and east Asian housing policy model. In Agus M. R., Doling J. and Lee D. S. (eds), Housing Policy Systems in South and East Asia. Palgrave, Basingstoke, UK, 178–88.
Esping-Andersen G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Forrest R. S. and Izuhara M. 2009. Exploring the demographic location of housing wealth in East Asia. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2, 2, 209–21.
Gill I. and Kharas H. 2009. Gravity and friction in growing East Asia. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25, 2, 190204.
Groves R., Murie A. and Watson C. 2007. Housing and the New Welfare State: Examples from East Asia and Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
Hirayama Y. 2010. The role of home ownership in Japan's aged society. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 10, 2, 175–91.
Holliday I. 2000. Productivist welfare capitalism: social policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48, 706–23.
Housing and Development Board (HDB) 2010. Lease Buyback Scheme to benefit more elderly HDB households. Press release, Housing and Development Board, Singapore, 5 March.
Huang J. 2010. Reverse mortgage scheme has merit. Taiwan Today, 9 April. Available online at http://www.taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=98146&cctNode=426 [Accessed 22 April 2010].
Izuhara M. 2007. Turning stock into cash flow: strategies using housing assets in an ageing society. In Hirayama Y. and Ronald R. (eds), Housing and Social Transition in Japan. Routledge, London, 94113.
Jacobs D. 1998. Social Welfare Systems in East Asia: A Comparative Analysis Including Private Welfare. CASE/10, Centre for Analysis of Social Welfare, LSE, London.
Johnson C. A. 1982. Miti and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Charles E. Tuttle, Tokyo.
Jones C. 1993. The Pacific challenge: Confucian welfare states. In Jones C. (ed.), New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe. Routledge, London, 198217.
Kasza G. J. 2006. One World of Welfare: Japan in Comparative Perspective. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Korea Housing Finance Corporation (KHFC) 2008. 2008 Annual Report. Korea Housing Finance Corporation, Seoul.
Kwon H.-J. 2005. The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. Routledge, London.
Land and Housing Corporation 2009. Act on the Construction of Bogeumjari Housing. Land and Housing Corporation, Seongnam, South Korea.
Lee J. 2008. Productivism, developmentalism and the shaping of urban order: integrating public housing and social security in Singapore. Urban and Policy Research, 26, 3, 271–82.
Lim K. L. 2001. Implications of Singapore's CPT scheme on consumption choices and retirement. Pacific Economic Review, 6, 361–82.
McCarthy D., Mitchell O. and Piggott J. 2002. Asset rich and cash poor: retirement provision and housing policy in Singapore. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 1, 3, 197232.
Ministry of Government and Home Affairs 2005. Domestic Report. Ministry of Government and Home Affairs, Seoul.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 2005. Shakai Fukushi: Seikatsu [Social Welfare and Public Assistance]. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport 2007. Fudosan no Shoken-ka Jitta Chousa [Survey of Real Estate Securitisation]. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Tokyo.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2009. Economic Survey of Japan 2009: Financial Stability: Overcoming the Crisis and Improving the Efficiency of the Banking Sector. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/document/3/0,3343,en_33873108_33873539_43783491_1_1_1_1,00.html.
Park B.-H. and Lee H.-O. 2007. A comparative study on housing welfare policies for the elderly between Korea and Japan – focused on the elderly who can live independently. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1, 1, 90103.
Peng I. 2004. Post industrial pressures, political regime shifts and social policy reform in Japan and South Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4, 4778.
Ronald R. 2007. Comparing homeowner societies: can we construct an East–West model? Housing Studies, 22, 4, 473–93.
Ronald R. 2008. Between investment, asset and use consumption: the meaning of home ownership in Japan. Housing Studies, 23, 2, 233–51.
Ronald R. and Jin M. Y. 2010. Home ownership in South Korea: examining sector underdevelopment. Urban Studies, 47, 11, 2367–88.
Shinkawa T. 2005. The politics of pension reform in Japan: institutional legacies, credit claiming and blame avoidance. In Bonoli G. and Shinkawa T. (eds), Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World: Evidence from Eleven Countries. Edwin Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
UN. 2001. UN World Population Ageing 1950–2050. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York.
Uzuhashi T. K. 2001. Japan: bidding farewell to the welfare society. In Alcock P. and Craig G. (eds), International Social Policy. Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 104–23.
Walker A. and Wong C. K. 2005. East Asian Welfare Regimes in Transition. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.
White G. and Goodman R. 1998. Welfare orientalism and the search for an East Asian welfare model. In Goodman R., Kwon H. and White G. (eds), The East Asian Welfare Model. Routledge, London, 324.
Yoo I. and Koo I. 2008. Do Children Support Their Parents’ Application for the Reverse Mortgage? A Korean Case. KDI School of Public Policy and Management Working Paper Series 08-03. Available online at http://www.kdtschool.ac.kr/faculty/paper-asp.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 66 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 600 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.